All Episodes
June 30, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:52
June 30, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
This is Tuesday, right?
Yeah, I was up.
I was like 4 30.
I was working on a big project last night.
4 30, maybe 5 o'clock when I went to bed.
I don't remember which.
I don't even remember sleeping.
So it still seems like Monday to me.
But I'm just checking.
This is Tuesday.
Okay.
Greetings, my friends, and welcome, Rushlin Ball.
This is the EIB network, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, the network named appropriately after the talents of the host.
Our telephone number is 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on the program today, the uh email address, El Rushbo at EIB net.com.
U.S. consumer confidence took an unexpectedly steep slide in June.
That's from Reuters.
Unexpectedly.
Every bit of what were they expecting?
A big rebound?
Let's go to the audio sound bites.
I want to take you back to me on this program, January 9th of this year.
We're going to start seeing stories that will not be true that feature man on the street interviews with people whose lives are starting to get a little bit better.
They see the light at the end of the tunnel now.
They get on more job interviews and they're doing a little bit better.
Drive-by's will start setting the stage to create the impression in the minds of people that we're coming back when we're not.
Just as they try to set up this mood that we're going to hell in a handbasket when we're not, notice how that works.
That convinces people the old saw about, well, I'm doing fine, but I'm hearing on the news.
My neighbor's about to lose his job.
We're in trouble here.
So how does it play when you're out of work, but you hear that other people are getting jobs?
If you are an Obama voter, you think your time is just around the corner.
You got to be patient because he's already working.
He's already his plan is already working.
If you think a demagogic, flowery spoken candidate or president, with an accomplice media can't convince people things are great when they're bad.
You've got another thing coming.
If they can convince them things are horrible when they're good, the opposite's also possible.
To this day, people who are alive have voted for Roosevelt thinking he's the greatest president we ever had.
And not because of World War II, because of social security.
Because of Medicare.
So don't doubt me.
That was all the way back on January 9th of this year, before the BAST even rode into office.
Now let's go to uh this morning, CNN's newsroom.
The anchor Betty Wynne spoke with your money host Christine Romans about the economy.
And Betty Wynn said, hey, Christine, explain this.
How do we do in the first half of the year?
We've seen a spring stock market rally that has been quite incredible.
Job losses are slowing.
Consumer confidence is improving.
People are feeling a little better.
They're feeling better because they're spending less, they're saving more money, they're getting back to basics.
There's a new frugality, it's making them feel better.
There was a huge rally in the stock market in the second quarter.
The stock market telling us that it thinks things are gonna get better eventually, and you're gonna see that rally.
If you are still invested in stocks, if you had faith and you were buying stocks along the way this spring, you were buying them at cheap prices.
You're gonna see that rally when you open up your 401k statement.
Stock markets down 120 today.
Consumer confidence, according to Reuters, took an unexpectedly steep slide in June.
And do I know these people or do I know these people?
I predicted on January 9th and here on June 30th.
CNN.
It's morning in America.
Your 401k is ballooning.
We feel better spending less money.
We feel better spending less.
Well, because we're being disciplined.
We're saving.
I guess we're f every do you realize how happy all of you are?
CNN just said so, and this reporterette, Christine Romans from uh Your Money, CNN Show.
What did I tell you?
They're gonna do everything they can to make stimulus is in trouble.
The Obama uh approval index in Rasmussen is at minus two.
Now remember now the Rasmussen approval index takes the uh strongly approve and the strongly disapprove and matches them up.
And he is minus two.
First time in negative territory for the BAMster out there.
And uh so they're they're trying to ramp up all kinds of uh uh fictional imagery to convince you things are great when they are not.
I by the way, yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, if you were here at the almost this exact time, you recall we had a couple of examples of the chicken of the news.
Women writing news stories about the Mark Sanford uh Argentina Girl from Epanema affair.
And I I missed one yesterday because it wasn't yesterday, it was June 27th.
It is by Erica Lovely at the Politico.com.
Inside Sanford's Love Letters.
It's a love story worthy of a Nicholas Sparks novel.
A high-ranking politician sneaks away from the pressures of political life to meet his secret lover, a beautiful, intelligent brunette from Argentina.
He's willing to risk anything, even a potential shot at the presidency to be with her.
In the meantime, he plies her with hopelessly romantic love letters.
This piece goes on to analyze the love letters.
He's a great writer.
He's colorful, he's descriptive, he's on a bastardly romantic at times to the point of being schmaltzy and embarrassing.
I have a question, ladies.
Actually, for everybody, I've if you've read some of these Sanford emails, they they I mean, he pours his heart out to her.
Now, why is that Schmaltzy?
I mean, do you think she thinks it's Schmaltzi?
Do you think the girl from Epanema thinks it's Schmalzi when she gets it?
Or is it just these prying eyes of outsiders?
Oh, that's Schmaltz.
Uh Miss Lovely, would you love to get a love letter from whoever is in your life like Mark Sanford writes them?
And would you consider it Schmaltzy?
I mean, I'm not making too big a deal about this, but uh Schmaltzy and embarrassing only to the people outside the relationship looking at it.
But still, the bottom line is, and she writes it, what emerges is that regardless of the moral ambiguities of Sanford's character, the man was a real romantic with a knack for writing.
The most cherished gift a lover can give and receive is a love letter from the heart, says romance coach Leslie Karsner.
You got me.
I don't know what a romance coach is.
We ought to look one up and get romance coach and note that the romance coaches are women.
I'd bet you don't find a guy romance.
Well, by now you probably do.
Anyway, Leslie Karshner, she uh sells pre-written love letters through a website called Love Letters Now.
It's sort of like the Hallmark cards of love letters.
If you take the politics out of it, it's the story of a man whose heart was captured.
He was willing to run the risk of being caught.
They love this guy.
They women are going nuts over this guy's love letters.
And I just wanted to mention this because I left it out of yesterday's stack because I didn't.
It was from January or June 27th, three or four days ago.
Uh male romance coaches, I think I think they're called players.
They're players.
Romance coach.
Pre-written love letters.
What would you think, ladies, if you got a love letter that some clown procured off the website?
By the way, one an update, uh, ladies and gentlemen, we also had a story yesterday of Time magazine that uh marriage makes women bloat up.
Uh in fact, not even marriage, it's getting into a relationship causes women to become obese.
It doesn't happen to men, but it causes women to have it.
This came from the magazine Obesity Today.
That was the survey.
Oh, Love Unlimited Orchestra, Barry White, Music Maestro, the The title of the tune, my sweet Summer Sweet.
Hey, look at keep the music up, because I like this.
Look at this.
From Iran's press television, state-run media in Iran.
Ahmadinizad gains votes in recount.
just like in our country.
It happened just like in our country.
Norm Coleman wins in Minnesota, they have a recount, and they keep having recounts, and Al Franken wins.
So they had the recount in Iran and shazam, Ahmadinejad gained votes.
So.
By the way, folks, they um used to call a romance coach a spinster.
Romance coach.
If you need a romance coach, forget it.
The hopeless.
Just go to a bowling alley and you'll find somebody.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
A pop quiz, ladies and gentlemen.
What do God and Barack Obama have in common?
God does not have a birth certificate either.
Welcome back.
Rushlin bought the EIB network, 800-282-2882.
I want to go back to this CNN soundbite again.
This this uh uh Christine Romance you realize how outrageous this is.
I mean, this is journalistic irresponsibility and malpractice, unless you understand that this is CNN, state-run media.
This is an analysis of the U.S. economy in the first six months of the year this morning on CNN.
We've seen a spring stock market rally that has been quite incredible.
Job losses are slowing.
Consumer confidence is improving.
People are feeling a little better.
They're feeling better because they're spending less, they're saving more money, they're getting back to basics, there's a new frugality, it's making them feel better.
There was a huge rally in the stock market in the second quarter.
The stock market telling us that it thinks things are gonna get better eventually, and you're gonna see that rally.
If you are still invested in stocks, if you have faith that you were buying stocks along the way this spring, you were buying them at cheap prices.
You're gonna see that rally when you open up your 401k statement.
That's an absolutely absurd.
Obama himself said stock market, we don't pay attention to it here in the White House.
Stock markets is a tracking poll.
It's up one day, down the next.
I'm looking at the long term.
The truth is that families, American families have lost 20% of their wealth since January of this year.
Some families more than that.
This is the average 20%.
I mean, there are trillions of dollars of wealth that have been lost in 401ks, pension plans, stock portfolios, people being fired.
And here the uh let's see, this is uh uh state-run media associated press unemployment rates rose in all the largest U.S. metropolitan areas for the fifth straight month in May.
How the hell does how do these people get jobs?
These economic people on these networks, what in how did they?
Well, it's a rhetorical question.
They're hired because of the way they think, not what they know.
At any rate, the labor department said today that the jobless rates in May rose from a year earlier in all 372 metropolitan areas that it tracks.
The unemployment rate in Kokomo, Indiana, jumped to 18.8%.
Christine Roman, somebody needs to get you the news here.
We just CNN's telling everybody what a great rebound we're in here.
You're doing great, you're feeling great because you're frugal, you're not spending as much.
You're 401k, you love to open the envelope, it's getting bigger out there.
Stock market came back big time, second quarter.
Consumer confidence is down, not up, as she said.
Consumer confidence took an unexpectedly steep slide in June.
The uh other metro areas posting large unemployment gains, bend, Oregon, where the jobless rate rose to 15.2%.
That's an increase of 8.8 percentage points.
North Carolina's Hickory Lenore Morgantown area, and if it's Linwa, forgive me, uh, saw its unemployment rate rise to 15.4%.
That's a gain of eight and a half percentage points.
372 metro areas, the labor Department tracks and all of those areas.
Unemployment's up.
And yet state-run media is starting to tell us how great the economy is.
I dare say, ladies and gentlemen, the vast majority of these cities, metro areas where unemployment's up, skyrocketing.
I'll bet you that they're run by Democrats.
And I'll bet you they've been run by Democrats for a long time.
Now, yesterday, in discussing cap and trade, this abomination that was voted for and passed the House of Representatives voted on and passed on on Friday.
I was explaining, you know, what I'd missed, and I apologize to you for missing something so blatant cap and trade.
Trade.
Who's going to trade?
Who's going to monitor the trades?
Who's going to do the trades?
Who's going to get the profit?
Who's going to get the fees?
Who's going to get the commissions on the caps that are traded?
The pollution credits and so forth.
Wall Street, Goldman Sachs.
And I speculated that these Republicans, particularly the Northeast Republicans, voted for this abomination because campaign cash from Wall Street firms weighed more than their constituents' desire for the bill to not pass.
Well, according to the Washington examiner, Kevin Mooney, House Republicans who received campaign donations from environmental groups helped make up the narrow margin of votes needed to send Waxman Markey Cap and Trade Bill over to the Senate.
Legislation passed by a vote of 219 to 212 with critical assistance from eight Republicans, and we identify them again for you.
Mary Bono, Mack, California, Mike Castle, Delaware, Mark Kirk, Illinois, Leonard Lance, New Jersey, Frank Lobiando, New Jersey, John McHugh, New York, Dave Reichert, Washington, Chris Smith, New Jersey.
Political action committees connected with the League of Conservation Voters, the Sierra Club, Ocean Champions, and Republicans for environmental protection have made donations to most of these same eight Republican lawmakers in recent election cycles, according to OpenSecrets.org.
Representative Kirk of Illinois, for instance, among the top 20 recipients of PAC donations from environmentalist wacko groups in the 2008 election cycle.
This story details all of the contributions to all of these Republicans.
So it wasn't Wall Street money, it's an it's even more environmentalist wacko.
Republicans.
Republicans taking environmentalist wacko money.
And uh those of you who who um live in the districts represented by these people, you have to know that the money donated to them mattered more to them.
You know, paying back that donation than voting your desires, and probably what they instinctively think about this bill anyway.
Here are some more details about the cap and trade program.
You know, home sales, by the way, and uh as Obama would say, most economists from across the spectrum agree.
That's how he does it.
Economists from a wide spectrum of thought.
All agree home sales are critical for the recovery of the American economy.
And the administration is saying this.
And it's true, home sales are critical.
So why put these provisions in the cap and trade bill?
Listen to this, home buyers beware.
If you're trying to save up for a new home, you may have to save up a little longer for your purchase.
The Democrat bill would dramatically increase new home costs by mandating California's expensive new building codes for the entire nation.
Immediately upon enactment, the Democrat bill would demand a 30% increase in energy efficiency for new construction.
A couple years later, the Democrat bill will require an additional 50% improvement.
These numbers were chosen with no concern for cost of consumers or feasibility in implementation, and most people voting on it didn't even know these provisions were in the bill because there was not a bill.
So this is going to stifle the American economic recovery because it's going to stifle home sales.
That's just one of two or three items I want to tell you about.
The difference between God and Barack Obama.
God does not think he's Obama.
Welcome back, Rushlin Boy, 800 282-2882.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
By the way, the Associated Press just breathlessly reported that Mark Sanford has admitted to more than one liaison with the girl from Eponema.
I know Ipanema Beach is in Brazil.
It just fits.
The Argentinian babe, and I'll guarantee you that news chicks across this country are now swooning.
This is just fascinating.
We've got a call from Honduras, and I want to take it.
It's Jim.
Jim, I'm glad you got through to us today.
Welcome to the EIV Network.
Thank you, Rush.
I I appreciate you putting me on the line.
I'm calling you right now from Honduras.
What city?
I can't tell you, Rush, because that could possibly put my family in danger.
You're kidding.
No, I'm not kidding.
Um, if this situation gets any worse, Rush, uh Americans are going to be kicked out if um what Obama has done to support a known dictator in Melzalaya, who has been taken out by the government peacefully.
Rush, I need to tell you it's not a coup, which is what what is being reported by CNN.
A coup was not it did not happen, did not take place.
Uh was peacefully done.
There was nobody nobody killed, uh, there was nobody put in danger, and uh the uh military put the uh control right back to the Congress, and they peacefully uh took care of business.
Yeah, I think I think a recap of what happened here is called for.
Uh there's a constitution.
Uh the current president wanted to violate it and continue to serve in office.
The uh Supreme Court and the legislature there both agreed he couldn't do so.
He ignored them.
Then the military came in and replaced him.
There was no violence, as you say, and as it is now, you have dictators, Chavez and Castro, along with the U.S. President Barack Obama agreeing with uh the dictatorship president, the dictator leader of the hopeful dictator of Honduras.
It is an amazing uh and breathtaking thing to watch.
I have some comments about this after you you tell us what else you wanted to say about it.
Yeah, Rush, I just wanted to let you know if if they are if if they are allowed back in, they are currently in Nicaragua.
Um they uh Daniel Daniel Ortega is also involved in this.
If they are allowed back in the country, Chavez is threatening to attack this country.
I don't know if you're aware, Rush.
I you probably are that uh um Ronald Reagan put two mil U.S. military bases here in this country, and I don't know what's gonna happen, Rush, but I'm afraid I've been here 14 years as a missionary.
There's many Americans here, and uh, we are all against there's about 95% of this country rush is against what's going on with the present uh president that was taken out.
There's a very, very small majority.
Basically, your drug lords, your gang members, your thugs that are supporting Mel Zelaya and uh the rest of the regime uh from Venezuela and Nicaragua.
It's amazing to watch uh and Jim, thanks so much for the call.
I it's great to have an on-the-site report from down there.
Ninety-five percent of the Honduran people are opposed to the act of their uh ex-president Mel Zelaya.
Uh during his campaign, President Obama made a big deal of criticizing leaders who are elected democratically but don't govern democratically.
And he had a chance to show that.
He had the chance to to demonstrate that in Honduras, and he hasn't.
He has sided with regional dictators in opposing what's gone on in Honduras.
Now let me I want to put it to you this way.
You have uh the d the country, Honduras, you've got a president, and there's a constitution.
And this president is limited to how many terms he can serve.
He didn't like that.
He wanted to blow that out.
He undemocratically stated, I'm staying in office.
This alarmed the uh uh their version of Congress, the legislature down there, uh, and the Supreme Court, both bodies told him he was acting unconstitutionally and could not do it.
He ignored them and essentially told him to go to hell.
It was at that point that the military went in and took him out peaceably.
There they the guy's got a point here.
Uh uh really wasn't a coup.
It was the Constitution being upheld.
It was not a government being overthrown, it was a government being upheld, a government being sustained and uh getting rid of somebody who wanted to turn into an Ortega, who wanted to turn into a Chavez, who wanted to become a Castro, and these are the people our President of the United States is siding with.
Now, why?
Why?
I I'm gonna tell you something, folks.
The drive-by's and the state-run media are not going to bring this up.
But it's time to lay it out.
The U.S. foreign policy is out of control.
There isn't one.
I can't determine what our foreign policy doctrine is.
It is a mess.
It is incoherent.
Our president is sending conflicting signals all over the country, and I think we're being laughed at as we stand up and support this dictatorship or would-be dictatorship and align ourselves with other dictators in the region.
You know they have to be laughing at us in the Middle East, from Saudi Arabia to Iran to everywhere around the world.
They're laughing at us because they're laughing at the naivete or at the good fortune that they have witnessed in having this man, Barack Obama, be president of the United States.
He he certainly uh clearly seems to have inherited Marxist tendencies from his father, Barack Obama Sr.
So I think the question needs to be asked point blank.
Mr. President, if your foreign policy doctrine, so to speak, is to endorse Marxist leftist regimes, no matter how they come to be, either by force or by ballot, then you should say so.
He should be pressed to say so.
Do you support and endorse Marxist left?
Well, the answer is obviously yes.
He's very friendly with Ortega, he's very friendly with Chavez, and he hadn't met Castro yet, but I'm sure that'd be a you know old home meeting as well.
Uh i i it doesn't it appear this way, folks?
This he's endorsing and very friendly with Marxist-leftist regimes, no matter how they come to power.
Now, why?
Let us ask why, and let's get beyond the ideology.
And I know some of you people are going to think that I've gone over the edge because I was up late last night till five o'clock working on a mysterious secret big project, which someday I hope to be able to tell you about.
But I think Obama is easily typecast.
I think he has natural sympathies toward authoritarians.
He has sympathy for dictators.
He relates to them.
He inherited his father's Marxism.
And it's not me saying this.
It's uh somebody from an American thinker, the Nigerian woman writing last week, referring to Obama as uh average African colonel.
Um you have to wonder if Obama is just trying to lay a foundation for not being a hypocrite when he tries to serve beyond 2016.
I wouldn't be at all surprised if in the next number of years there is a move on the 22nd Amendment, which term limits the President of the United States.
He may not do it that way.
He may not, he may not openly try to change the Constitution.
Uh, but there might be this movement in the country from his cult-like followers to support the notion that a democratically elected leader who is loved and adored, has Carte Blanc once elected.
Just serve as long as he wants because the people demand it.
Because the people want it.
Because the people love him.
And I wouldn't put it past Obama to be plotting right now how to serve beyond 2016.
And I think the way he's reacting to what's happening in Honduras, look, they've got a constitution.
They are a democratically elected set of officials down there, and you had a guy running the country, Melzelaya, who was just going to basically rip that country's democracy to shreds, and the country moved in to stop him from doing it.
And Obama sides with the guy who wanted to rip up the Constitution.
He sides with other dictators in the region.
Regardless, I mean, one thing is clear here that uh Obama is nothing if not a hardcore liberal.
Always, always more sympathetic, appearing to side with the bad guys on the world stage.
And I'll tell you, folks, this this business about serving beyond 2016, you know, the the thing that when you look at Obama's followers, and we've discussed it here, they are a cult-like bunch.
And their attachment to him is not political.
It's not ideological, it's not issue-wise.
It is cultish.
It includes a wide percentage of minorities, by the way, who, for different reasons, who will come to think that he simply cannot be replaced.
Let all these let it let him let him succeed with amnesty, for example, and all the illegal aliens who are instantly made citizens.
He'll be too important.
Right now he's too big to fail as far as the drive-by's are concerned.
He's too important to be replaced.
No one else can lead the nation, they will say.
And they won't care a whit about the legalities that might be trampled.
Half of them wouldn't care about the legalities anyway, if they don't even know about them because they haven't been properly educated.
So, you know, it's this is um I think this inst this situation in Honduras is very instructive.
I think anybody who thinks that he intends to just constitutionally go away in 2016 is nuts.
I I think that's what all his acorn stuff is all about.
I think given acorn money, fraudulent voter registration, whatever it's going to take, these these are these are people who seek power for reasons other than to serve.
They uh they seek to rule.
All right, a quick time out.
We'll be back.
I got to take a brief break.
Your phone calls and other exciting elements in the stacks of stuff upcoming.
By the way, the uh the new Honduran president said that he doesn't see any way to negotiate with uh the Obama administration.
And uh take us, to Gusagalpa is awash in rumors that Venezuela is marshaling its forces for a possible invasion, as the caller Jim from Honduras said he's a missionary there.
Washington Post has this today.
I I guarantee you uh Chavez Ortega will not let this stand.
This was a move to take Honduras to a dictatorship.
This is Chavez's dream, and it's a it's it's just outrageous that the president of the United States is siding with dictators on this.
Of course, the rest of the world is siding with the dictators of the world, bank, the uh United Nations.
Well, what would you expect?
The United Nations is an organization of dictators and thugs, primarily, whose primary objective is to fleece the United States of as much capital money as it can.
And get this state-run media Reuters reporting that the U.S. Treasury said today that it has targeted an Iranian-based firm for its ties to North Korea's missile proliferation network.
This is a move that bans U.S. companies from dealing with it.
Hong Kong electronics, located at Kish Island, Iran, has been named for transferring millions of dollars of proliferation-related funds to North Korea from Iran.
And meanwhile, we are in the process of destroying our own economy.
The president of the United States is telling Israeli Jews that they cannot build their own homes in their own country.
He refuses to meddle in Iran, and he's meddling all over the place down in Central America and in Honduras.
Tough to keep up.
We need to know what is the Obama foreign policy doctrine.
If it is the support of Marxist leftist regimes, however they come to power, we need to be told.
That needs to become official, officially stated U.S. doctrine.
Because right now his foreign policy is all across the board, and I it's just a mess.
It's incoherent.
As evidenced by all this garbage going on with North Korea and Iran.
And in case you missed it, the recount in Iran showed that Mahmoud Ahmadinezad got even more votes, just like in our country.
All right, Cameron in Martinsburg, Pennsylvania.
I'm glad you called, sir.
You are on the EIB network.
Oh, Russ, how are you doing?
Just fine, sir.
Thank you.
Yes.
Yesterday, uh at the end of your show, a man called up, and uh he as much as said that he thought uh Michael Jackson was a child molester, and you try to defend Michael Jackson.
Uh it's my belief, sir, and and with all due respect, you are due a lot of respect.
But with all due respect, it's not a conservative position to take to try to defend Michael Jackson.
Uh well, I I wasn't taking a political position or an ideological position, nor was I defending Michael Jackson.
Uh I'm glad you called on this, Cameron.
I appreciate your uh nice comments because I got a lot of email about this last night from uh web subscribers calling me a pervert and a number of other things for defending this child molester.
Uh let me take a little time here because it was at the end of the program, didn't have a lot of time.
We had a caller yesterday who uh what was his original, what was he wanted to uh talk about?
What was his original purpose?
I forget what, but he said to me in the Oh, that's right.
He was he was upset that the media was good doing nothing but covering Michael Jackson and ignoring other serious issues.
And then he said, and uh uh nobody will convince me that uh that Michael Jackson's not a child molester.
And I said, wait a second, you're you're you're no different than the media.
And I commented on the media yesterday.
The media has been in total, almost total speculation mode since Michael Jackson died.
We don't know what the autopsy results are.
We don't know what the drug situation was, we don't know any of this.
This is a media disgrace.
They don't know this is not defending Michael Jackson, but I'm gonna tell you, folks.
This happens to me every day, being lied about, misrepresented, miscast by the media.
It has happened every day for 19 and a half years, ever since they first heard about me.
I have it, I have a different sensitivity to this.
Now, Michael Jackson, and I've I've I can relate to this.
Michael Jackson was charged with child abuse.
He was tried, and he was found not guilty.
I don't know whether he abused kids or not.
I know he paid off a kid once, a family.
And I but I I don't know.
All I'm telling you is the state of California did not make its case in that trial.
It was a lousy case.
The woman, the mother was a lousy witness, and so was her son.
Now the justice somebody sent me an email.
Well, oh, I found OJ not guilty too, and I guess you believe him.
Two entirely different things.
You had jury nullification in the OJ case.
This was this was uh different circumstance altogether.
My only point here is that we have a media out of control, and if they're willing to totally speculate and lie and report things they do not know about anybody, you need to be suspicious about what they say about everybody they report on and every event they report on.
We'll be back.
I am holding in my formerly nicotine stained fingers a great editorial cartoon by the great Ramirez in Investors' Business Daily.
It's a tropical setting for parrots.
Castro, Chavez, Ortega, and Obama all squawking.
Restore the dictator in Honduras.
It's a fabulous cartoon.
Export Selection