All Episodes
Previous Next
June 26, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:34
June 26, 2009, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And we're back, Rush Limboy and the Excellence and Broadcasting Network serving humanity simply by being here.
It's Friday.
And we are back, as I say.
And we'll have a lot of your phone calls in this hour.
Telephone number is 800 28282, the email address, El Rushbow at EIB net.com.
By the way, we have posted uh I I've I don't even remember Rachel what I specifically said, but I've been checking the email, and apparently when I called this Madoff Waxman Markey or whatever, and gave a list of what they intend to do, apparently.
You gotta put that on YouTube.
It's great, everybody.
I don't even remember what I said, so I call Coco.
I said, Coco, give me the transcript of what I said.
It was just an hour ago or so.
Give me the transcript.
And he sent me the rough transcript.
I haven't even a chance to read that, but he just posted the transcript of what I said.
It was in the first hour that many of you are raving about.
And um it's it's I guess it's valuable since a whole lot of members of Congress don't know how they're gonna vote.
We're gonna put it on YouTube because it's been suggested.
It's a risk.
I don't know what I said.
I literally don't there's been so much content in today's program.
I don't remember specifically what I said.
And I know I don't have to because it's been taken down for posterity.
I'm always looking forward, not backward.
Anyway, uh I got a note from our official climatologist, Dr. Roy Spencer.
He says, you know what?
This phrase uh we're gonna run out of oil, it's never gonna happen.
So we're never gonna run out of oil.
Phrase makes it sound like someday we're gonna wake up and not have any.
Instead, what's gonna happen is down the road is the cost of fossil fuels will start to slowly rise over a long period of time when that happens.
Competing energy technologies will emerge as they become economically competitive.
We'll never run out of oil or coal because we'll just decide it costs too much to go after what's left of it in the ground.
And when that happens, the market takes care of all this.
We don't need nostrilitus waxman or Ed Markey or Bernie Madoff or Nancy Pelosi or Barack Obama saving us from this.
The market will take care of once again.
Uh we got a call from the office of uh Congressman Goodlat in It was Virginia.
I uh a caller said that he called Goodlat's office, and somebody at Good Lat's office said, Well, I don't know how he's gonna vote.
Uh but uh but but Goodlat uh has always been against it.
He's voted against it, he's written in his weekly column against the legislation.
Uh he has these uh columns where he has been consistently a no vote on his uh website, and their office uh didn't understand how information that he had no position was disseminated, but that's not the case.
So we're happy to be able to make that correction.
Now I want to go back to the amendment that they hurried through at three o'clock this morning.
Part of the purpose of this amendment on HR 2454, the cap and tax bill is to buy off the agriculture senators who are having some trouble with it.
They put in part of this amendment, the creation of a new Manhattan Project for Energy Independence.
Project calls on the president to reach 50% energy independence in ten years.
We could do it in ten years if we just drill for the oil that we've got.
I'm sorry to yell, folks, but it's out there.
Tons of it in Alaska, offshore.
So uh calls on the president to reach 50% energy independence in ten years and 100% in 20 years.
And they're gonna award competitive prizes to the first individual or group who can reach any of seven established energy goals.
Double cafe standards to 70 miles per gallon while keeping vehicles affordable.
Cut home and business energy usage in half.
Make solar power work at the same cost as coal.
Make the production of this stuff enrages me because there's nothing wrong with coal.
There's nothing wrong with oil.
There's nothing wrong with We do not need to switch off of these energy sources.
Anyway, these are soap pie in the sky.
The very idea that they have to offer an award for this means that it's not feasible.
Nobody in the market is working on it.
And the reason is energy is already highly profitable because everybody needs it.
If you're in the energy business, you make a profit.
Everybody needs it.
You know what happens when your power goes out?
You know how mad you get.
Imagine if you ran out of gasoline as often as you lose power of your house.
You need it, and there and people provide it are going to get a profit for doing so.
So if there is this new magical technology out there with all this profit potential everybody's going to need, they'd be on it already.
So if we're going to start, I'll tell you, I'm gonna I I'll I'll offer a prize.
I don't know what it's gonna be.
The first liberal who can call here and convince anybody in this audience that George Bush is responsible for the death of Michael Jackson.
I'll give you an award.
You blame everything else on George Bush.
Why not this?
and How about how about getting an award if you can figure out how to get our spaceships to go warp speed?
How about offering an award for coming up with an actual way to make somebody invisible?
How about an award for finding the technique that we can fly like Superman without having to have an engine strapped on our back and no wings?
I mean, Superman could do it.
Somebody can come up with a technology so we can fly around.
Look at the energy reduction that would create.
If we could just fly like birds.
Now, granted, we'd probably have to eat a lot more to flap our arms.
Well, but Superman doesn't flap his arms, just lays out there.
So somebody comes up to invent flight the way Superman does, we'll give an award for that too.
How about an award for world peace?
I'm so we already have that.
Nobel.
Nobel Peace Prize.
There's never world peace, but people get awards for it, nevertheless.
Well, see, this is what I'm worried about.
What I'm worried about is that somewhere down the road, some yokel who understands the game here, is gonna come up with some little vehicle that has a 70 mile per gallon or 70 mile per gallon cafe standard meets it, and these lunkheads in Congress are gonna say, oh, look at it, it works.
When it doesn't, just to say that they've created this miracle or have managed uh one to happen.
Uh this stuff I'll tell you, just every day.
Every day it just keeps adding up.
They just keep going for more and more of this stuff, and every day it's just stand up and say, Stop.
No, you won't.
Let's see.
What is this?
Yeah, here's another get this.
What is this from?
It's a Cleveland Plane dealer.
It's their website, Cleveland.com.
Here's the headline.
Tree owners could reap climate bill windfall.
For years, landowners have gotten paid for not farming.
Now they may get paid for not cutting down trees.
While U.S. families could see their annual energy bills rise thousands of dollars under a massive climate bill that Obama and a Democrats are trying to push through the house.
Owners of large swaths of forest land, timber companies, large farms, even foreign countries, could reap billions of dollars.
The bill is aimed at curbing the gases, largely carbon dioxide from power plants and vehicles blamed for global warming.
You know, I I'm getting to the bursting point on this.
There isn't any global warming.
Since 2001, temperatures are flat line.
There isn't any global warming.
Anyway, the new bill would allow polluters to buy credits from owners of forest land as an alternative to switching to fuels other than coal and gas or installing expensive equipment to capture the greenhouse gases.
The landowners would get the credits because trees suck Up greenhouse gases, preventing them from reaching the atmosphere and acting like at a blanket to warm.
This is already a hoax going on out there.
Arnold Schwarzenegger flies back and forth from LA to Sacramento in his own jet every day to work.
And they say, what about your carbon footprint?
No, no carbon footprint.
I'm planting trees.
Or he's giving money to companies that say they're planting trees.
This is so absurd.
I don't know about you.
I I'm I'm just losing patience every day with an insults to my intelligence.
In Salt Sweden spend time on this rod gut, so people that own forests are not.
If they don't cut down a trees, they're gonna reap a windfall because their trees are gonna soak up all the carbon dioxide is not causing global warming.
Frank O'Donnell of the advocacy group Clean Air Watch says in effect the public in this bill is gonna pay polluters to plant trees.
Does that really lead to a major improvement in global warming?
I don't know, and I'm not sure anybody knows.
It's called water vapor, for do you know the vast, the number one source of carbon dioxide?
Greenhouse gases of water vapor.
It's like something 94, 95%.
Water vapor.
Now, I don't think anybody in this bill has figured a way to drain the oceans.
If there is a way to drain the oceans, I don't know where to drain is.
Where do you pull the plug to drain the oceans?
Some days.
Some days, some days, this is back, 800-282-288-2, Rushlin Ball, open line Friday.
All right, from two sources on Capitol Hill.
I'm hearing, and I fairly trust these people.
They've been they've been fairly accurate in the past that the Democrats right now are 12 votes short, with 17 undecided.
So there's 17 Democrats undecided.
They need 12 of that 17.
Those are not good odds.
But it's not over.
Trouble is brewing for them on this.
Uh, this is no time to relax the pressure on this.
I have a friend, folks.
The funny little note here.
I have a friend who owns one of those Maybox.
These are giant, these are the Mercedes version of the Rolls-Royce line.
He's 6'6.
He weighs 270 pounds.
So he likes his big car.
And it probably gets two miles to the gallon in the city and eight on the highway.
And he said, I'm exaggerating there.
It's like 10 and 18 or some such thing.
I don't know what it is.
Anyway, he said that if he's forced out of his my buck and he has to go buy one of these bubble cars, it's going to take two, one for each foot.
Because he simply will not be able to fit in one of these new Obama mobiles.
Either that, either that, who's losing money?
The Teslas, you mean?
Tata?
The Tata?
The Tata, the Indian car?
From the country of India, the Tata.
I have not heard of the Tata Motor Car.
I did see where the Obama people are going to fund this Tesla.
I had that yesterday.
Some 400 million dollars, bail them out or do something to Tesla.
I don't even know what the Tesla is.
Alright, look, uh, folks, a couple couple things here.
Reference this earlier, and I want to share the data with you here from the exact sources, the Cybercast news service.
The stimulus law enacted in February promoted the purchase of plug-in electric cars by the federal government and the broader market.
But a GAO report, that's your government, my friends.
A GAO report released this month says the use of plug-in electric vehicles will not by itself decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
To do that, the report argues the U.S. would have to switch from coal burning plants to lower emission sources to generate electricity such as new nuclear power.
The electric cars will do nothing to help emissions.
And I don't want to hurt the feelings of any of you people driving hybrids out there, but if you're driving a hybrid to save the planet, you have been snookered.
If you drive it because you like it and you want it, and you get thinking better gas money, it's fine and dandy, no complaints.
Now, to show you how the government doesn't know what it's talking about.
During the ABC Obama merchal for nationalized health care.
The president said that the Congressional Budget Office, when they're out there counting all these costs for health care, they're not counting all the savings that may come from prevention.
That's how he says, no, their costs are way too high.
CBO says 1.6 trillion, but the president tried to say on ABC Wednesday night, but they're not counting the savings that might come from prevention.
Now wait just a second on that.
I thought all these smoking bans from around the country would eliminate most of our country's health problems.
Do you remember these promises?
We were told that secondhand smoke was a killer.
We were told that secondhand smoke caused cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, cancer, and birth defects.
You name it.
I've got the story here from uh PR Newswire.
It's uh August 17, 2005.
Secondhand smoke imposes significant costs on non-smokers and society, according to recent Society of Actuaries study that concluded the annual costs of excess medical care, mortality and morbidity from secondhand smoke exposure in the U.S. is approximately $10 billion.
This includes approximately $5 billion in direct medical costs and $5 billion in indirect costs, like lost wages, reduced services, and costs associated with disabilities per year.
Now, Coco, I want you to put this up too, because we have the suppressed World Health Organization report that says secondhand smoke is not a problem to anybody unless make them uncomfortable.
It's not a health risk.
They suppressed it, they took it down, we have it.
It's in our essential stack of stuff.
But we'll put it up there on the free side so you can see it.
My point here is Obama said a Wednesday night.
Well, they're not factored in all the costs we're going to save with prevention.
Well, we have banned smoking in practically every public place, right?
Because smoking and secondhand smoke was going to kill people.
It was going to cause cardiovascular disease, respiratory disease, cancer, birth defects, you name it.
It was imperative for the nation's health and welfare that we eliminate secondhand smoke.
If we did, we would be practicing preventive health care and saving billions of dollars in the process.
$50 billion over 10 years in direct medical cost savings.
That's what we were told.
in order to take away our liberty, we were told that we could save $50 billion in health care costs and untold numbers of lives if we just eliminate secondhand smoke, meaning ban it.
Now that required taking away somebody's liberty.
Remember, tobacco's not been banned, folks.
It's not an illegal product.
They ginned up all this panic and they've not saved a dime.
It was a pack of lies.
We don't hear about it anymore.
Where are these savings?
Where are the savings from the banning of secondhand smoke?
It's always promised cost savings with these control freaks.
Why haven't health care costs been reduced by tens of billion billions of dollars since the non-smoking laws have gone into effect?
Would somebody explain this to me?
Because they didn't exist in the first place.
Because you were lied to in the first place about secondhand smoke killing you or making you sick.
I realize some of you in your head think it will be, but it won't.
Living under a volcano won't make you sick for crying out loud.
You'll recover from it.
Live in a place where they don't let you use DDT, you're in trouble.
I'm serious about this, folks.
This is a classic example of how we are lied to In order to give up our liberty and freedom, we're going to reduce health care costs.
We're going to ban secondhand smoke.
The only way to do that is ban smoking in public places.
Well, I still hear all the complaints about rising health care costs, and I hear all the complaints about increasing uh cardiovascular disease and so forth.
Why haven't these health care costs been reduced by tens of billions of dollars since all these non-smoking laws have gone into effect?
Hmm.
It was a pack of lies to jam these laws down our throats.
We're watching it all over again.
Obama is recycling the same lies used by the anti-smoking Nazis.
There is no cost savings.
This whole method of reducing overall health care costs because of prevention is just a trick.
So you will give up your behavioral freedom and allow it to be regulated by autocrats like Barack Obama and the Democrat Party.
These are phony promises, so we will give the central planners a little more power over us.
We will trade away our liberty for what we think is safety, security, and our health, and it's all a crock of excrement.
And the same thing is happening with his energy bill.
A bunch of mind-numb robot promises made up out of thin air that have no relationship to reality in any way, shape, matter, or form.
Now you're not saving your life, you're saving your planet's life.
And to do it, you're being asked to give up way too much of your liberty.
From the National Review Online, the corner, which is the name of their blog, a post by Steve Hayward.
Word flying around D.C. as of 1 30 this afternoon is that Waxman Markey is being pulled.
Now, I haven't heard that it has been.
This is just word flying around.
This might suggest Pelosi doesn't have the votes, or it might be that they need a little more time to buy off one or two more people, or possibly they simply can't get enough committed yes votes because all these people are running around saying they'll vote yes as necessary, but they've got a deal for cover with a no vote because they know what their constituents want.
So the uh that that would complicate the ability of the whip to get an accurate count of how many Democrat votes there actually are.
So, and uh my two sources say that uh they're 12 votes short with 17 undecided, that means they would need 12 of 17 votes today, which pretty high percentage.
You know, folks, time for little philosophy here.
Government's role.
You look at the Constitution, and you read the Constitution.
Government's role is to secure liberty, not seize it.
As is stated in the Declaration of Independence, in fact, Americans are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, life, liberty, pursuit of happiness.
We all know that phrase.
But what follows is just as important.
Here's the whole thing.
Americans are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
To secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, to secure the right to life, to secure the right to liberty, to secure the pursuit of happiness.
To secure these rights, governments are instituted.
The United States government's purpose is to secure our unalienable rights, not seize them, as socialized medicine certainly does.
That's self-evident to a majority of Americans, and because of that, we're being forced-fed a diet of lies from the alleged guardians of our freedom.
The object of nationalizing the relationship between a doctor and patient and putting the government in the middle of it does not bring the object of government securing our rights any nearer.
Obama's attempt to seize control of the health care industry will put our rights at a greater distance.
Barack Obama feels that the power of the office of the president.
He feels it.
He forgets the rights of the people.
Our liberties are sacred, yet we find them being treated with all the concern of the swatting of a fly by our own president and his political party.
The cost of health care is a concern to people, but it's a red herring as it relates to the relationship of the U.S. government to those who have granted them the privilege as guardians of present and future liberties, i.e., our elected officials.
The president and this Congress are behaving as captors and oppressors.
Not only in health care, but this whole cap and trade B.S. And this must not stand.
Thomas Jefferson said in his first inaugural address that the president was to lead, quote, a wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned.
This is the sum of good government, and this is necessary to close the circle of our happiness.
Now most atheists of felicities, but happiness.
Now most Americans are not happy with the state of affairs in Washington.
In fact, most are outraged and are frightened.
Under this administration, our pursuit of happiness has ground to a complete halt, and it's been replaced with a pursuit of survival.
James Madison, in a speech delivered in 1788 in favor of the Federal Constitution, said, Since the general civilization of mankind, I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.
You know, it's amazing every time you go back and consult founding fathers, you find that their wisdom was timeless.
Their ability foresee the future was incomparable.
Liberty is the birthright of every American.
The usurpation of liberty, whether it be by nationalizing health care or taxing the energy we need to live.
That's a seizure of liberty.
That's a usurpation of liberty under the false pretense of providing security.
Or saving the planet.
Economic security is the role of the private sector.
Economic security is the role of the individual.
Economic security is the role of a person born with liberty, exercising that liberty to secure whatever he can for himself and his family in life.
The safety and defense of the country is the role of the federal government.
Economic security is not.
Barack Obama is on a relentless march to weaken the private sector, to deplete it of money and capital, to seize control over our lives.
His words may not convey that.
His actions, however, establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
I am the foreman of this jury.
And the verdict is guilty as charged.
Barack Obama, the Democrat Party, usurping the liberty of American citizens.
See, I think that there are millions of Americans who know in their hearts and minds what Barack Obama and Democrats are doing is wrong.
I know it.
The revulsion that most Americans feel when it comes to socialized medicine comes from the instinctive feeling and understanding of the concept of liberty.
We know the difference between security securing liberty and seizing it.
So the answer is no, we won't.
Our personal liberty is not for sale and it's not up for a vote.
It's our birthright.
We've made the mistake of electing somebody who thinks his job as president is to secure his power by seizing our liberty.
and And members of his party agree with this.
And this is the foundational building block of virtually everything that you hear them talking about.
I don't care if it's immigration reform, uh, cap and trade, nationalized health care, stimulus bill, all of this stuff is designed to.
Look, folks, it's very simple.
Look at the cap and trade bill.
All it's going to do is take away more of your disposable income by raising the cost of energy.
Energy is something everybody needs.
It's like food.
When you raise the cost exorbitantly on a need like energy, you are going to rob people of disposable income.
And when you rob people of their disposable income, you're robbing them of their liberty.
And you're making them more and more dependent on something other than themselves to just get by.
And if we have a nation of people who are just trying to get by, we are going to cease being America and there will be no such thing as American exceptionalism.
I'm not even going to talk about Obama's motives.
They're not important to me.
I know what they are, but I can just tell you that Obama looks out across this country as a giant pot of gold.
He can go get it from here, there, and he thinks that somehow it's going to be magically replaced once he grabs it.
Because his policies are smarter than anybody in the private sectors.
Even though he's never run a damn thing in his life.
All he's done is agitate people.
He has never ever run anything.
So he can see his little bits of the private sector here, a large chunk of it there, transfer the power of that particular entity to the federal government where everybody is a brilliant individual can make it work better than anybody in the private sector.
Of course, it never works.
And to him, the private sector is never going to be depleted.
There's always going to be some more of it to grab and put under his control.
It really doesn't matter why.
All you have to do is come to grips and admit that that is what's happening.
And it's time to say no, he won't.
When he starts to gin up this whole little chant, yes, we can.
We'll come back, and when we come back, I promise we'll close out with your phone calls.
Stay with us.
Okay, back to the phones we go, and we'll go to South Florida, somewhere down here to say, Lou.
Thanks for the call, sir.
Appreciate your patience, and welcome to the program.
Hi, Russ.
They always thought I was a boy in school today, but that was okay because I got sent to the gym's boy.
Well, I'm sorry, it's not your fault.
It uh snerdly did denote that you're a female up there.
I just well, once I got there, they knew.
But anyway, Rush, uh, really appreciate you taking my call and top of the afternoon to you and all your listeners.
And I've been listening to you for a long time, especially today.
I really got tickled at some of the things, and I wrote a few comments down if that's okay.
Um when you were talking about Obama being a fantasy land, here's an idea.
Why don't we just send everybody to Disney World?
They can set up shop in the Pink Castle.
Nancy Pelosi can wear her little dress and really you know move her wand around.
And then the other thing that she mentioned about you know, pulling the plug in the ocean.
Well, when people have Obama fever like they do, they're brainwashed.
So if he was to get up and tell the people that there was a plug in the oceans, you'd have all the brain left-wing people out there on a massive mission to hunt for it.
Well, you're I mean, you're right, he's already done it.
I mean, I mean, in one of his acceptance speeches during the campaign, the guy's out there saying that he's uh we've got to get about a business of lowering the sea levels, and it's gonna happen because he's elected.
And I guarantee you uh when I watched his acceptance speech at Grand Park on the 91 the presidency, acceptance speech, the victory speech.
I mean, I'm looking at these people in Grand Park, they were they were they were pod people.
What is it?
Invasion of body snatchers.
Pod people.
Uh-huh.
Oh, oh, it's so wonderful.
Jesse Jackson's out of there crying Oprah Winfrey thing.
How come I'm not in the special section?
It was a it was a mixed bag, but you're right, but people have that view, still too many do.
Rick in Charleston, South Carolina, open line Friday, your next.
Hello.
Hey Rich, how are you doing?
Fine, sir.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Listen, I'd just like to say you're doing a real good job, and to quote one of your parodies on Dan Rather, courage.
Just keep doing it.
Thank you, sir.
I wanted to talk to you about health care.
I'm a uh former Canadian known American.
I worked in Canada under the National Health Care Service from its inception until 1984 and then moved to the States.
That would mean you're a doctor.
You got it.
Okay.
Sorry, I thought I thought I told your screen of that.
Anyways, yes, I am.
And your uh the thing that I want to talk to you about more than anything else, this whole concept of Trojan horse.
When the Canadian healthcare system started, it was private.
It was started by the medical profession in the province of Ontario, and then followed by the health care industry.
The government felt that its people weren't being adequately looked after, so they put in their own parallel plan.
And it went broke.
And so the government decided what we got to do then is get more funds, so they took over all of private health care for.
Wait, wait, wait a second.
You're telling me there was a private sector health plan in Ontario.
There was.
That would start government employees thought it wasn't good enough for them.
Right.
Oh no, I'm sorry.
They did like it.
The government employees themselves, like the firemen and the policemen, they took private health care.
But it was the less well-off individuals that the government wanted to cover.
Oh, I think that's a good thing.
So they did sort of a mixture of Medicare Medicaid and started their own personal subscription medical uh health care service where people could buy insurance from the government.
But their plan went broke, so they took over the he the private plans to get those premiums into their hands.
And that's what's going to happen here with Obama's parallel plan.
Uh well exac however it happens, the private health care plans will evaporate.
You can't compete with an entity that does not have to make a profit.
And that is the United States government.
Folks, I have learned to cast my fear aside.
When I learned to do that, I can't tell you how life opened up.
And I a lot of people still have a problem conquering fear.
Some basic fears.
How many of you fear that your computer's hard drive is going to crash?
You all should fear that if you don't have it backed up.
How many of you fear leaving your laptop in a cab or at the airport or just having it stolen?
Or an accidental spill.
You're out there consuming adult beverages, you have a couple too many, and bam okay the scotch inside the computer.
Uh-oh, uh oh, but there's a way to make sure that if that happens, you haven't lost all the important data on your computer because Carbonite safely securely automatically backs up the hard drive off-site online.
You don't need to do anything.
Carbonite's always working in the background whenever you're connected to the internet.
And restoring them is simple.
Restoring these lost files.
Carbonite unlimited backup for your Mac or your PC is just fifty-five dollars a year.
You can start a fifteen-day free trial today.
Use offer code Rush at Carbonite.com, and you'll get two free months if you decide to buy.
And you don't have to give the credit card the first 15 days.
One thing that always bugs me.
Oh, try it.
Try this exo, whatever it is, website.
Try it free for 30 days.
Oh, you sign up and they want your credit card.
Carbonite doesn't.
You got a genuine 15-day free trial, and then you decide which you will decide to go ahead and sign up.
Carbonite.com, offer code rush.
Before I get out of here today, I want to remind you, I mentioned this uh the last week, a friend of mine, Cyrus Norasta, who wrote the great movie, The Path to 9-11 that Disney buried.
They won't release it on DVD that Clinton was allowed to get in there and change.
Cyrus has a new movie out.
It's called The Stoning of Soraya M. It open it opens tonight, I think in in ten cities, major markets, uh, and they hope it builds from there, but it's it's uh that's an hour and fifty minutes.
It's a it's a one of these you'll you'll you'll grip the side your chairs watching the movie, and there is a stoning in this movie.
It is it's uh it's accurate depiction of the rights of women in Iran and uh some Islamic, uh especially some militant uh fundamentalist Islamic countries.
Uh stoning of Sarah M. And if uh if you're looking for a movie to go watch this weekend, try to find it because I think that you'll enjoy it.
▲
Export Selection