All Episodes
Previous Next
June 25, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:42
June 25, 2009, Thursday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back.
Great to have you.
It's Rush Limbaugh, and this is the one and only Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
As usual, a thrill and a delight to be with you.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program 800 282-2882 and the email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com.
All right.
As we discussed at the top of the program, guess what?
Just it's happening now.
Well, it just finished.
Obama, uh uh stupid Rose Garden pushing the energy bill.
They're panicked, they gotta get this done tomorrow.
There's a bunch of wavering Democrat votes on this thing.
It's by no means a lock.
And the president went out there and said something that's just not true.
He said that whoever leads the world in new green technology will lead the global economy.
Talk to Spain about it.
Spain has tried to go all green.
It has been a debacle.
I tire.
I tire of having to deal with the lies, the misrepresentations.
He also said that his his energy program, he bashed oil, we're too dependent on it, jeopardize, jeopardize our national security.
We're not jeopardizing our national security by having an oil-based economy.
If we do not have an oil-based economy, we are not going to be secure.
It's just that simple.
He also said this is a jobs bill.
We already did a jobs bill.
It's called a stimulus package.
And how is that working out for you?
Sigh.
Oh.
Oh, yeah.
Thank you.
I'll tell you, uh this whole procedure here that is underway is just about ramming as much down our throats as possible before we have any idea what it is.
Folks, I implore you, and I don't do this often.
I seldom do this, but I I want you to ask your senators and your member of Congress, point blank, are you going to opt out of the health care plan you have to join the public option health plan you are going to write for the rest of us?
Don't accept anything other than a yes or no answer.
They'll try to obfuscate.
Well, you know, our plan's only for five or six other people and much easier to manage.
We're talking about 47 million uninsured the rest of America, blah, blah, blah.
No, that's not, no, if it's a good plan, it's a good plan.
If they're going to come up with the best plan for us, it's the best plan for them.
They work for us.
It's very simple.
You gonna opt out of your great health care plan and join the public option you're gonna write?
That's the only question that needs to be asked about any of this.
Now, one of the things in the energy bill, if I may jump to that, one of the things that's under assault in the uh in Obama's energy proposal here is the coal industry, and he has made no secret about this.
Uh I've got all kinds of stories here in my stack from yesterday and from today on wind energy.
Do you know that producing energy from wind is far more expensive than energy from coal?
And one of the reasons is we can't guarantee wind every day.
The second thing is we have no way to store wind harnessed energy.
We use it as it happens.
Coal, of course, is stored energy.
Wind energy.
I mean, and by the way, there is it doesn't work.
It's been tried.
There's no great new technology out there that is gonna produce this this nirvana with uh with wind energy.
You know, there's a reason.
Can we talk a little common sense here?
There is a reason our electrical needs are satisfied primarily by coal.
We have some gas and some nuclear thrown in, but there's a reason.
That most of our power plants use coal.
Do you know what it is?
Take a stab, Snerdley.
Mm-hmm.
It's because of all the mechanisms out there to create energy.
It's the cheapest.
It's the most dependable.
Now, the Obama people would have you believe that the only reason we use coal is because of big coal.
Now we have this massive coal industry made up of a bunch of uh people that want to screw you left and right, and they want to kill you left and right.
Remember, in Obama's view, this country is immoral and unjust.
And the uh the big success stories in in uh the American private sector are nothing more than cheats, liars, frauds.
But there's a reason we use coal.
It's cheap.
It's dependable.
There's no deep dark secret about this.
Not because of big coal or big oil or big nuclear have cooked up some nefarious scheme to enslave us to their product.
It's because long before the current crop of crazy environmentalist wackos were even a gleam in their ponytailed father's eyes.
Or a dream of their air-in-the-arm pit mothers.
The market answered the question about the best way to provide for the electrical needs of the nations.
And these were the choices that won.
Coal, oil, nuclear.
They won because the market decided it was they were the best.
It was not because some nefarious scheme forcing these horrible products on us.
You know, when Mr. Ponytail guy or Mr. Hare in the Armpits woman and had their little kids and they're thinking about changing the world for the better.
The people that were making the world work did not decide on wind or solar.
They decided on coal because it was cheap, it was dependable, and it worked.
No, the robber barons did not foist anything on us, as Obama says.
The real dirty secret of wind power is that you only have power when the wind blows.
And we don't have the ability to store wind power for later use.
You know what it would take to do that?
A giant energizer bunny battery.
Which, of course, they're bad news, too.
They're horrible.
Your little hybrid you're driving around in battery.
What do you think powers your battery?
Where do you when you plug it in, charge it up when you're gonna have to do that someday?
They're going to plug it into some windmill turbine?
We cannot yet bring different power sources on and off the electrical grid just based on the whimsy of the weather.
We don't have the ability to just throw a switch.
Okay, we got wind, turn off the coal-fired plant, turn on the windmills.
We don't have that ability.
There's much more involved in getting electricity to your house than most people realize, and the people who've made it possible did it in the market, and the market always decides if you leave it alone.
And you know what?
We can't build power lines from one end of the country to the other to solve intermittency, wind, because electrical power is limited by range of transmission.
Maybe one day we're gonna overcome all these technological challenges, but those breakthroughs are not in our lifetime.
I mean, we haven't even reached a corner or turn the corner, and we see the possibility.
We're not even at the corner yet.
We're looking at a mirage, we're looking at an oasis in the desert.
We're walk, we're wandering around the desert thinking that we're killing ourselves with oil and coal and nuclear power, and we and we're and we're just we're wandering, we hadn't had any drink for a couple days in the desert, and we see a mirage out there, see a windmill.
And that's all Obama's green energy program is a mirage.
Now, all these technological challenges to making windmills work and all this other rot gut that they're thinking about, it's gonna be hugely expensive.
That's the allure to Obama.
That's why General Electric is big on this stuff.
They know they're gonna be in a bunch of government money to develop and work on these projects without having to sell a single dishwasher, microwave oven, or jet engine.
Think of Think of this.
Think of starting today to build an electrical grid designed specifically for wind, because that's what we're going to have to do to make wind effective.
That'll end up being a true cost of wind energy.
Basically, scrap coal and we're going to do a do-over.
We're going to start from scratch.
And now to compare that cost against the real case scenarios for the effects of global warming, you realize that no rational person would believe wind power is any kind of a logical choice.
Besides which, wind farms are ugly, and everywhere they end up being, people start complaining about the noise they make.
Even one guy, I said it was the story a couple weeks ago.
One guy put up a little windmill somewhere in his backyard, and the noise from it drove his neighbors crazy.
So all of this is just a panacea pie-in-the-sky project.
Promise that's based follow the money.
It's simply based on money and Obama's sick desire to autocratically rule a country.
Now, one more thing about Mark Sanford before we go to the break here and get back to your phone calls.
I would posit something here.
There's a lot of people.
I've gotten a lot of email since the Sanford story broke.
See, Rush, this is why Republicans have to get rid of social issues.
We just have to get rid of them.
Because this hypocrisy is going to kill us.
People are people, human beings are human beings, they're going to have affairs, they're going to have abortions, they're going to have to do this, and we just we in politics we can't, we're always we're going to lose people because people are going to have affairs.
Democrats don't lose people when they're hypocrites because they don't kick a kids rush because they don't have standards.
And we do.
I'm hearing this from a lot of people.
I would there's something for you to think about.
Just a little think piece here.
How about the fact that society needs hypocrisy?
I'll be happy to explain it, snertly.
It's simple as pie.
I shouldn't have to explain it, but I'll be glad to.
I'm not saying hypocrisy is a virtue, but it is a necessary evil.
Society needs it.
It's a virtue.
But Rush, but Rush, how can you say that?
Is it hypocrisy preaching moral values and not living up to them?
Yeah, that's exactly right.
It's exactly what in this case hypocrisy is.
But hypocrisy does not deny moral values.
If somebody can be a hypocrite but not be a hypocrite, if somebody can be immoral and not be a hypocrite, then what's happened to standards.
You want a party run by a bunch of people who have no standards?
You've got it.
You've got it.
The Democrat Party, and you've had it for years, and look where it has taken us.
Hypocrisy does two things, both at the same time.
Hypocrisy show, and you're not going to want to hear this.
I know you're not, but hypocrisy shows that there are moral values in a culture.
Without moral values in a culture, it would not be possible for anybody to be a hypocrite.
The fact that we are calling Sanford a hypocrite is the proof that there are still standards of dignity and morality that apply in our society.
It also shows this hypocrisy.
It also shows that violating those moral values are wrong.
We all think Sanford's an idiot, right?
We all think he's stupid.
We all think he's wrong, especially when you read the statement his wife issued.
His wife said, I'm willing to take him back.
I'm willing.
She said, I've I view my life, I got one legacy in my life, and that's the character and dignity.
I instill in my children.
And that's why what my husband's done is so hurtful and so harmful.
All the work I've done helping him get elected and helping him do his job means nothing to me if my kids don't turn out.
Why does she care?
Well, because morality and dignity matter.
And without hypocrisy, we wouldn't know what morality and dignity are.
But moral equivalency, on the other hand, that rationalizes away any morality.
The Democrat Party exists on moral equivalence.
The Democrat Party exists on the concept of defining deviancy down to where nothing's wrong.
And nobody can be criticized.
And I think any healthy society needs moral values and therefore must preserve them.
Hypocrisy is a lot more helpful in preserving morality than moral equivalence is.
I don't know about you.
I don't want to live in a culture with no morality where anything goes and there is nothing wrong.
Then you wouldn't have to worry about raising your kids.
Just give birth and let them do what they want to do.
It doesn't matter because there's nothing wrong.
But you know there are things, or there are certain things...
And by the way, since we're all human, and we all stray, and we all stay stray off the path.
It doesn't mean that morality's wrong.
And it doesn't disqualify somebody who strays from knowing what morality is.
That's what the Democrats try to do.
Any Republican who is a normal human failing, they try to disqualify from ever commenting on morality and dignity.
And you do not have to live a perfect life in order to be able to comment on morality and dignity, because it is impossible to live a perfect life.
We all have that little voice in our heads.
Our conscience, we all know when we're doing something wrong.
We all know it.
If we just listen to voice in our heads more often than we do, then we'd do fewer things wrong.
Well, we're human.
It doesn't mean that we're disqualified from knowing right from wrong just because we violate the tenets.
So I'm not I'm not looking, I'm not speaking in strict political sense here.
I'm not saying, well, let's let's let's scrub the social issues.
I'm simply saying that give me a society any day where there is hypocrisy, as opposed to a society with moral equivalence.
Because then we've defined deviancy so far down that we've decided we can't do anything about that particular wrong, so we're not even gonna try to anymore.
We will cease to exist as a functioning society.
Quick time out.
We'll be back after this.
Back to the funds here on the EIB network.
They're going to Paul in Nashville, Tennessee.
Great to have you on the program, Paul.
Thank you for waiting.
Hi, Rush.
Glad my name is not Henry Giddo's to you.
Thank you, sir.
Um we're not able to judge the spirit of someone in order to determine the financial outlay that we're committing to them based on this uh health care standard.
But we don't we don't have the ability to quantify our empathy for this health care recipient under my new plan.
But I will appoint a Supreme Court nominee who must, in even more black and white ways, that is applying the law, must have empathy to gray the law out.
So I'm not really sure I understand the message coming from President Obama.
You know what?
You know what?
I uh let me tell you something, Paul.
That is a brilliant catch.
That is a brilliant get.
In case you are just joining us, President Obama in his infomercial last night on ABC that came in last in its time slot, was asked a question by a woman who had a mother who was a hundred years old and needed a pacemaker, and the plan that she had said, no, no, no, no, no, she's too old, no, no, no, no.
But the mothers, the the daughter said, but she's got so much spirit, she's got so much spirit.
So we found the doctor that would put the pacemaker in.
She lived to be 105, she's still living 105, so Obama was asked, what about what about the human spirit?
Well, we can't judge spirit in making these decisions.
We can't we can't take spirit into a that's right.
Obama's trying to kill human spirit throughout the American economy.
Yet you're right, he wants judges who use empathy totally in rendering legal decisions.
Empathy is nothing more than spirit or feelings or what have you.
So based and but but there's one caveat to this.
Empathy is a code word.
When Obama talks about judges having it, all he means by it is I want people who are racists and bigots on my Supreme Court who are always going to find for minorities and the underprivileged simply because they've gotten a shaft all their lives.
I want people on my court who are going to rule against the so-called rich and the so-called powerful because they have carried the day for too long.
So I the empathy is just a code word for somebody who has sympathy for the downtrodden.
Exactly.
Hey, uh one last thing.
Yeah.
Uh first of all, thanks.
So two last things.
Thanks for the strawberry letter 23 bump.
What a great uh taking me back.
What a great thing.
And then uh 15 years ago, a friend of mine, Taylor Jernigan in Montgomery, Alabama, turned me on to your show, made me see the errors of my way, and uh Taylor will one day be governor of Alabama.
But uh shout out to him and thanks to you.
Well, thank you very much, Paul for your sense of timing is perfect.
You should get a radio show.
You can hit commercial breaks perfectly.
Audio sound bites, by the way, we're uh up to 17, 18, and 19, Mr. Broadcast Engineer.
Okay, the Obama Informational ABC News, perfect example of why the Heritage Foundation's existence is crucial to America's access to facts and analysis.
Now, I think four point something million people tuned into ABC News complete rollover to the White House.
And that's what it was.
It was a complete rollover, it finished last in its time slot.
It came in last to reruns last night.
However, millions of other people are going to hear the truth on the administration's plan for health care reform from the Heritage Foundation.
You see, folks in Congress and the House, they have access to the same information that you do.
At Askheritage.org.
They use it.
They themselves, their staff, they produce first-rate research used by elected officials, the press, and policy organizations.
So when Obama tells America that they can keep their same health care coverage if they want to, they help the Heritage Foundation reads the proposals all the more closely.
And it's not true.
They observe that 15 million people may be employed by companies that will elect to pay a tax and dump the employees into the national health care system.
The Heritage Foundation has researched it.
Even the White House came out after Obama's comments of the AMA and said Americans should not take Obama so literally.
Now, if you're looking to make sense of this complex issue, use the Heritage Foundation.
I do.
Starts with you becoming a member at AskHeritage.org.
It's not expensive.
And it's a gold mine of conservative scholarly information.
Memberships are easy.
I've been a I've been a member for years.
And believe me, many of you are now joining me.
It's huge.
You can access some of the best information available as uh television network news departments turn the keys over to the White House.
An independent place for you to go on the web, AskHeritage.org.
Bruce in Asheville, North Carolina.
Great that you waited, and then welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Yes.
How are you doing, Rush?
Just fine, sir.
Thank you.
It's a pleasure and an honor.
I'd like to just take your uh your notion or your observation before about if the members of the House and the Senate and the and the government in general had to live under the same rules of Health care.
Um, I would if I could just I would like to ask uh Representative Banyer, the minority leader, look, why don't you propose that amendment and say we have to live under these rules, A and B, and unions are exempt from uh the tax exempt?
And if they if no if that if that no if that turns then take your members and walk out of the house and at least make a public stance you may go down.
That's that's fine.
And uh Boehner may do it.
I mean, the the Republicans in the Senate and the House may come up with some kind of legislation, but don't leave it up to them.
Would you please not leave it up to them?
Oh, I'm right.
I'm writing.
All right.
I am writing.
The question is very simple.
Are you going to drop your current great health care plan and roll and enroll in the public option you're going to pass for the rest of us?
Uh I think you could probably all of you lead Boehner and the others into proposing such legislation.
The question is, will they opt out of it?
I I I think they'll probably exempt themselves out.
Um it's a golden opportunity for 'em.
It's a golden opportunity for them.
Uh but the proof see is in the pudding.
How many of these people are going to write this wonderful brilliant public option?
They're going to want to join it themselves.
Answer zero.
Now, not zero, maybe too extreme.
There might be some that'll that'll do it for the for the show of it and so forth, but it you get the point here.
The point is it's Senator Kennedy's version of the bill, the Senator Kennedy version on page 114 of the Kennedy version of the bill exempts members of Congress and the U.S. Senate from the new public plan that's going to be written.
It exemps them, along with exempting union members from having their health benefits taxed as income, as the rest of us are going to have our health benefits taxed as income.
That's why they're trying to ramrod this thing through so people don't find out about this stuff.
So it's already in the bill.
Page 114 of the Kennedy bill in the Senate.
Members of Congress and Senate exempted from the new public option.
The new public plan.
So you just need to ask them.
Are you going to opt out of your current plan and join us in the public option?
If it's so wonderful, so good, so necessary, we're going to cut costs, we're going to save the health care system.
Are you going to join us in this?
You going to give up the plan you got now?
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
My friend Professor Hazlitt would laugh.
Eh, eh, eh, eh.
No way.
They need to be asked the question.
Look at this, folks.
I just I just found this.
What have we been talking about today?
The spirit of America that is being crushed.
And more and more people say, you know, the heck with this.
I'm going to try to enjoy whatever life I can here before it's all taken away from me and it's it's gone.
From the Financial Times, a growing pessimism about the prospects for a global economic recovery sent stock and commodity prices tumbling on Monday, while new data showed that leading U.S. corporate executives were cashing out of their shareholdings at a rapid pace.
U.S. government bond yields followed equity prices lower, confounding analysts who had expected that treasury rates would rise this week as the federal government auctioned off a record 104 billion dollars of debt.
Analysts said that the market mood was captured by a World Bank report that said the global economy would contract 2.9% this year compared with a previous estimate of 1.7%.
contraction for those of you in Rio Linda means it gets smaller.
A White House spokesman said later in the day that the U.S. unemployment rate was likely to rise to 10% in the next couple of months.
The downbeat commentary reinforced the view that investors should be more worried about the impact of economic weakness on corporate profits than the possibility of higher inflation and interest rates.
Executives in charge of the largest U.S. companies sent a signal of their concerns by selling far more shares than they bought this month, according to data based on securities and exchange commission filings.
So pessimistic executives are cashing out their shares.
People are starting to say, screw it.
Uh God Uh want to enjoy, I want to enjoy life.
And they're in the process of destroying it.
Here's Ben in Dayton, Ohio.
Hi, Ben.
Thank you for calling.
You're up next at a Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hey, Russ, College Kid Ditto's from Dayton.
Thank you, sir.
Um, I'm I'm 21.
I'm a student.
I'm an engineering student, but I don't know.
Theology is kind of one of my passions, and I just loved your uh analysis on the need for hypocrisy.
And I just wanted to add, like, I'm uh kind of borrowing from C.S. Lewis, but uh when two people bicker, you know, there's like both people kind of consent to an implied moral standard that uh, you know, that the other person should like adhere to, so um uh anyway, I just wanted to say that was a great analysis.
C.S. Lewis, C.S. Lewis is exactly right.
Did you hear what you understand what he said?
You didn't understand what he said.
When two people argue or bicker over moral standards, it proves they exist.
It's all he was saying.
Umor equivalency, the left to Democrat Party.
All I was saying was that hypocrisy is far more useful to a society.
May not be to a politician now.
I'm talking about the society, folks.
Hypocrisy is far more useless and valuable to a society than moral equivalence is.
Moral equivalence destroys standards.
Hypocrisy upholds them.
Now, I'm not suggesting everybody go out and be a hypocrite.
Don't just illustrate again, it's common sense.
And this is common sense is not liberal or conservative most well, most often not common sense is conservative, it very rarely is liberal.
But common sense is common sense.
Moral standards exist.
And when you have a blatant case of hypocrisy, I don't care who it is.
JFK, Clinton, uh Anson, John Edwards.
What does it show?
Shows that we've still got standards.
We ought to be going.
Speaking of John Edwards, I have to tell you.
I don't care if Chris Matthews understands it.
Chris Matthews, a lost cause anyway.
I don't I don't waste my time with people who are unpersuadable.
John Edwards.
The world knew that he was having an affair and, The world shortly thereafter knew that he'd fathered an illegitimate child.
Nobody except the national inquirer would touch it.
The drive-by state-run media could not get interested in it.
They were told, well, Mithra Limbaugh, Theresa was the myth of Edwards that's the paragon of virtual and thief, suffering from life-threatening campter, and it was just too painful to put her through the circumfant.
No, that's not why they didn't go after they didn't go after Edwards because he's a Democrat.
It's not wrong.
In his case, it wasn't any big deal.
They tried to cover it up.
McClatchy, on the other hand, had a reporter in Buenos Aires, Argentina yesterday.
Tracking down where this babe lives and finding the emails.
And I wasn't, maybe McClatchy has a Buenos Aires bureau.
As much money as McClatchy's losing, I don't know, I'm not sure.
But whatever, they got a reporter down there, El Quicko.
They had a reporter down there before Sanford's press conference was over.
To this day, I don't know that McClatchy has fully reported on the Edwards situation.
Senator Carey, by the way, from yesterday, this was where in the Boston Herald, Senator Kerry, who served in Vietnam, by the way, was telling a group of uh business and civic leaders in town in Washington at his invitation about the the bizarre tale of how Mark Sanford disappeared for four days, claimed to be hiking along the Appalachian Trail, but no one was really certain of his whereabouts.
This this story appeared before the news hit that Sanford was down seeing the girl from Eponema on the beach.
And this is what Jan Kerry say, too bad if a governor had to go missing, it couldn't have been Sarah Palin.
Yes, he did.
Right here.
And the Democrat centric crowd laughed.
And then the Boston Herald says, of course, Kerry couldn't know that 24 hours later, the Sanford story would get even stranger when the Republican governor confessed he had actually been an Argentina over Father's Day weekend, a long, long way from the Appalachian Trail with his paramour, no less.
So they're laughing about it.
Be back after this.
Don't go away.
According to the Washington Post, there's another missing governor out there.
Tim Kane, a Democrat of Virginia.
Nobody knows where he is.
Jim Garrity at the Campaign Spot National Review Online says that the Washington Post is pretty sure he's not hiking in Appalachia or in Argentina.
He says, But nobody knows where Tim Kane is.
Now, Fox News has uncovered some details about the Paramour in the Mark Sanford case.
She's a 43-year-old employee of an international agriculture company.
She speaks several languages.
She lives in an upscale apartment building in Buenos Aires.
They've named her here.
She works for the international agribusiness firm Bungie Iborn.
She's been described as a beautiful brunette, big eyes, plays tennis on a nearby lawn and runs every morning in her neighborhood.
So she is professional, she's passionate, and a beautiful brunette.
At least she's not a mafia mole.
At least she's not trailer park trash, and at least she's not a videographer.
Try that one out, Chris.
See if you can figure that one out.
Audio soundbite time.
C SPAN's Washington Journal this morning, the host Steve Scully interviewing former Governor Tom Ridge.
I told you yesterday Schaefer was on this show the other day, and he said the biggest moment in his career is when he asked Cheney, okay, who's a better Republican Powell or Limbaugh and Cheney said Limbaugh.
Scheefer said he's still getting coming.
Most comments, most feedback ever.
Scully says, when the former vice president Dick Cheney tells Bob Schaefer that Rush Limbaugh is a Republican and Colin Powell is not.
What's your reaction?
Well, I think Colin Powell, ever since I've known him, I don't know how he was registered, even bothered to register it as a military man, uh, work within the Republican Party, certainly was out there campaigning for Republicans.
I mean, it's that it's uh Colin Powell was a Republican as far as I'm concerned, and uh and again it's that enormous regard for the vice president, but uh it's it's that mindset that I think is uh it creates an environment not conducive to uh the openness and the candid and honest disagreement we can have within the party and still retain unity.
Unity does not mean unanimity.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And uh what is what's the other saying all around unity does not mean purity, nobody's talking purity.
But I still I still remain, and again, this is what in the context of just plain old common sense.
I remain puzzled how Mr. Ridge can say that Powell campaigned for Republicans.
I I must have missed something, because I remember that Colin Powell endorsed the Democrat, Barack Obama, at a strategic point in the campaign in 2008.
And then he went out later and said Americans want more spending, bigger government, higher taxes.
Before California threw that one for in the trash.
So um, look, folks, I know what's going on here.
What I also know is that trying to say Colin Powell's a Republican and he campaigned for Republican candidates after endorsing Obama, he's not going to fly with Republicans.
Okay, I I we're we're up against it here on uh on time.
The constraints of the programming format uh necessitate another brief time out, which we'll take and be back El Quico.
I've been getting some emails from people in Virginia.
Rush, nobody cares where Tim Kane is.
Hopefully he'll stay out of the state.
I guess it's this way, folks.
If Colin Powell is a good Republican because he supported Obama and supports Obama's agenda, I guess Obama's a good Republican too.
And you Steve Scully, get ridge back and ask him that.
Is Obama a good Republican?
See you tomorrow.
▲
Export Selection