Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24 7 Podcast.
Have you here?
Snerdley, we're gonna do open line Friday today on Thursday because uh we're out tomorrow and Monday and Tuesday of next week, Friday, Monday, and Tuesday.
We got Mark Davis tomorrow, Mark Stein on Monday, and I forget who's in her on Tuesday, but I'll figure it out.
So open line Friday today, when you call, you can talk about whatever you want.
That's not the case normally.
And if I don't care about it, I'll fake it.
Now, staff wants me to announce when I've faked it, so you'll know how well I have faked it, but uh and I did that last Friday, but I it's somewhat embarrassing to the callers uh that that you fake it with.
Uh and so I'm I'm undecided about that.
Here's the phone.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882, and the uh email address L Rushbow at EIB net.com uh is the uh email address if you want to uh uh reach us that way.
Lots to do on the program today, folks.
The uh Barney Frank, the gay community you're gonna need Klaus Nomi again today, uh uh Mike, a broadcast engineer.
You're also probably gonna need uh banking queen uh available today.
A lot's popping out there, and let's let's just get started here.
This is from uh click orlando.com.
City workers must wear underwear, deodorant also included in Florida City's revised dress code.
This is the Brooksville, Florida City Council.
And I got out this, it's in the Orlando area, but I wanted to get a map out and see how close this was to Port St. Lucy.
And it's I mean, you'd you'd have to be going to this place to get there.
You wouldn't accidentally run into Port St. Lucy.
It's it's so Brooksville here is not within the uh area of dominant influence, shall we say Port St. Lucy.
The Brooksville, Florida City Council recently approved a revised dress code as part of its effort to update existing policies.
The revision instructs employees to observe a strict personal hygiene, including the use of deodorant.
It lists the observable lack of undergarments and exposed undergarments as unacceptable attire.
Now, my only question about the deodorant fine, I I can't believe people have to be told, particularly in Florida, but how are they going to check on underwear?
It would seem to me that to prove you're wearing underwear, you'd have to wear it outside your normal attire, which is also against the regulation.
And how are they going to police this?
I'm thinking if I instituted such a requirement here at the EIB network, requiring every employee to wear underwear, I wouldn't know how the hell to check it.
Well, you can't, you can't.
You you you cannot, you cannot make people drop trowel.
You can't do that, then you'd get sued.
And now, Dawn says that you can see panty lines.
Yes, just sometimes I know you can't, you can't, you can't even, you can't go, you can't, you can't go by the panty lines.
I don't know what they're gonna do in Brooksville, Florida.
I don't know if such rules exist in Port St. Lucie.
They might want to consult and uh see, and I'll I'll check with Rio Linda, see how they do it uh in real Linda too.
In Los Angeles, this is an unbelievable story.
This this is an illustration of just how steeply standard everyday ordinary American culture has declined.
This is from the Los Angeles Times.
I'm holding this story here, my formerly nicotine-stained finger.
The headline, Los Angeles County officials offer a novel idea to save millions of dollars.
Los Angeles County supervisors have suggested putting unemployed parents to work caring for their own children.
As part of a proposed change to CalWorks and other government programs.
Do you believe this?
I am not making this up.
This is some yesterday's Los Angeles Times with steep state budget cuts under debate in Sacramento.
Los Angeles County Supervisors voted on Tuesday of this week to push for changes to CalWorks and other government aid programs that they said would save nearly 270 million dollars.
Included in their suggestion is a novel proposal, put unemployed parents to work caring for their own children.
What we're saying, what we're saying, who has said this is Miguel Santana, deputy to the county's chief executive.
What we're saying is do not cut welfare to work outright.
Target the cuts to the people who are the most expensive.
Parents now receiving assistance have to attend job training and search for work.
While they fulfill those requirements, they're eligible for subsidized child care, which typically costs the state about $500 a month per child.
Oh my God.
No wonder the state is bankrupt.
If there are any parents in this audience who would require, who would have to be paid to care for your own children when you're out of work, I want you to leave.
I want you to change stations.
I want you to go so.
Why?
What are you saying?
Well, Snerdley says before you leave this program for good, you should call and explain to me why you think you should be paid to care for your own children when you are unemployed.
But I I can't believe anybody in this audience would fit that.
I just cannot believe it.
And I would not want anybody who would require payment to take care of their children who live at home with them.
To admit being listeners of this program.
It would mean this program is an utter failure in its attempt to inspire and motivate excellence and greatness.
I'm stunned.
This would no more.
If this had been proposed, and I look at, I've always said when I when I grew older, I wasn't going to pick up an old fuddy duddy, and I wasn't going to keep going back and talking about when I grew up and what I'll just tell you, when I was growing up, this that nobody would have ever even considered this.
Some of the quotes in this story are just uh uh priceless.
Uh who is this?
Uh and Mike Antanovich or Antonovich uh voted against exempting parents of children under age two from welfare to work.
They should be seeking employment in the long term, it benefits everybody in the county if they're trying to find a job.
Uh Supervisor Gloria Molina grudgingly voted yes, it doesn't fit with the spirit of welfare to work, but we're in a different situation.
What we're what we're doing is trying to say to them, don't eliminate welfare to work.
Here are some savings.
Maybe maybe I have something to learn on this.
You're unemployed, uh, you've got kids.
Your responsibility, the state says your responsibility is to get a job.
Standard American culture would say your responsibility is get a job and take care of your kids at the same time.
It's part and parcel losing your job.
The idea that you can be paid by the state to look for work and then be paid by the state to care for your kids.
When that's what I mean, isn't that the responsibility you assumed when uh when you had the uh young children?
ABC employees.
You know, this, I'm gonna tell you something, folks.
This this ABC special coming up Wednesday night.
I don't know if Fox News.
Oh, speaking of that, I have figured out a way.
Folks, I have figured out a way.
I got a brilliant idea here.
Uh finally get a way for Obama to speak out against the regime in Iran.
A way for Obama to denounce what's going on there.
Simply call Iran, the Fox News Channel.
If you call Iran, if we call Iran the Fox News Channel, Obama be denouncing it every day.
Multiple times a day.
We're going to have to do something uh like that in order to get him to denounce what's going on over there.
This thing Wednesday night in the White House, ABC, this is just getting out.
It is.
I'm gonna tell you what, ABC is going to sink.
ABC and NBC are sacrificing some of the greatest reputations and legacies news networks have built up to do this business Wednesday night to plug a political program for the President of the United States.
Opposing groups tried to buy advertising within the program, 60 second ads to oppose this, just presenting the other side.
ABC refused to sell it, which is their right.
So now these groups are trying to buy advertising time before and after to oppose this.
Also, there's another thing that happened when NBC Tom Brokaw has been chosen to sit on some White House council that picks interns, White House fellowships or something.
I mean, it it's I just I to me this this is this is a crossing of the line.
I don't know how Tom Brokaw can ever appear anywhere on NBC or Charlie Rose, which is one of his favorite places to go, and and and comment or analyze this administration with any credibility whatsoever.
I don't know how it can happen.
I don't know what they're thinking.
I don't know what NBC is thinking, period.
Well, I do know what NBC I'll tell you exactly what NBC is doing.
NBC, when you think NBC, think General Electric.
And when you think General Electric, think green technology and energy.
And when you think of that, think of all of the government grants, all of the Obama money that's going to end up going to sympathetic companies supporting his stupid cap and trade everything else plans, environmental wacko plans.
So ML, Jer Jeffrey Immelt, the uh CEO of uh GE can go out and collect a bunch of money without selling anything.
And in exchange for that, you got their cable channel, which is totally in the tank in the sink in the sewer, wherever Obama happens to be, they're there too, as state-run media.
And get Brokow sitting on some White House advisory board, and he's still gonna be out there commenting on this white house.
How in the world is any gonna be able to accept what he says as being anywhere near objective fair or whatever adjective that these journalists today wish to describe themselves as being.
I uh I got a note from the official climatologist of the EIB network, Dr. Roy Spencer, University of Alabama at Huntsville.
Listen to this note.
Dear Rush, do you think you could pull off an entire three-hour show without mentioning Obama or his policies or his plans?
I'll bet it would be really difficult.
Well, I've already shown I can't do it today.
But I got to think to thinking about that would be.
That that that's a great question because that would be difficult to do.
I could do it, I could do it, but what kind of show would it be?
We could do it, but I mean, do you ready to never mention Obama?
Tentacles are everywhere out there.
Well, I know I know, find a bunch of news.
Then there's a there by the way, speaking of news I care about.
George W. Bush in Erie, Pennsylvania fired back at Obama yesterday, and people are cheering this and asking, where has this been?
Do you realize not one member of the Washington press corps went to Erie, Pennsylvania, just a six-hour drive, to hear President Bush speak.
It was covered by local media.
Joseph Curl, the Washington Times got wind of it.
I guess he was there.
Uh, but it's pretty it's uh it's pretty hot, and it's about time.
But we got to take a brief time out.
We'll do that and continue after this.
Don't go away.
All right, I'm gonna do it.
I can't do it today, obviously, but I'm gonna do it one day next week or the week after.
I'm going to do an entire show without mentioning Obama or his policies.
There is a way.
One way to do it is just to call him Hugo.
That way I'm not mentioning Obama.
But I'm I mean, just do it for real.
We could call him Hugo, and that way I'm not calling him or mentioning Obama, but uh but not mention Obama's policies, be a show prep challenge out there.
Well, not necessarily show without politics.
And we can talk about like this this this crazy pay the parents for watching the kids story.
And we didn't have to talk about Obama doing that.
There's all kinds of local things out there going on, and Some national things as well.
So by the way, this ABC thing on Wednesday night, uh, the uh Conservatives for Patients' Rights, which is an activist group here that's trying to do what they can to forestall nationalized health care, has done some donor research, and the donor research reveals that ABC employees donated more than 160,000 to Obama's campaign, less than $5,000 to McCain.
ABC McCain contributions came from five people, one of whom was Elizabeth Hasselbeck of the View.
160 grand from ABC employees.
Now they say they're gonna be fair, they're gonna be in their minds.
I'm sure they are gonna be fair.
I'm sure that they're gonna this is an up and up thing.
They just so excited about this.
But believe me, my friends, it's not the case.
George W. Bush fired a salvo at Obama on Wednesday, asserting that the Bush administration's interrogation policies were within the law.
He declared the private sector, not government will fix the economy and rejected the nationalization of health care.
Said the president, I know it's going to be the private sector that leads this country out of the current economic times we're in.
You can spend your money better than the government can spend your money.
I, Mr. President, I theoretically I agree with you, but if President Obama succeeds in depleting a lot of capital from the private sector, that's going to be even harder for the private sector to lead the country back.
The private sector's in competition with the public sector with government, and it's losing.
Obama's snapping up as much as he can.
Now let's let's not forget something here, folks.
Wait a minute.
What did I just do here?
They just sent a second copy of the Oh.
And there's a fixed mirrors on there.
Well, let me put this aside over here.
Obama's taking over everything, and I I think something need to be pointed out endlessly here.
Is there one thing the government runs that makes a penny of profit?
Is there one thing?
They can't deliver mail with a profit.
FedEx can and does.
They cannot run a railroad with a profit.
Amtrak is a horrible money pit.
I know even some of our favorite people love to ride the Acello train, the speed merchant from Washington to New York, but losing money.
And it continues to be subsidized.
They can't run most states with a profit.
California, with its population and its natural resources, ought to be drowning in money.
They are bankrupt.
The whole government should be profitable.
It should be earning money on our money.
You know, Obama's announced all these sweeping regulations of the banking sector and the financial sector, and more regulators here would sell.
Somebody tell me who's regulating Obama.
Who's regulating Congress?
There's a poll out today, which I'm going to get to in greater detail as the program unfolds.
It's an NBC poll.
I think they've asked who's responsible for the deficit.
Twenty-six percent say Congress, 46% say Bush, 6% say Obama.
Now, that's its own lesson, and it dovetails with the call we got from Jeremy yesterday.
You remember that call?
Jeremy and Obama voter unhappy with him.
But why?
Because he sees Obama giving money to the big guys.
He sees Obama bailing out big business.
He thought he and others uh in the in the little guy's strata that voted for Obama were gonna get the money.
A fascinating perspective.
They don't see Obama destroying the private sector.
They see him building it up.
They're still mad at him.
That's why six percent don't blame him for the deficit.
But let me tell you where 100% of the deficit belongs, the blame Obama and Congress.
And if you wanted to get really constitutionally technical, it would be Congress.
Not one penny in this country can be spent without the House of Representatives first authorizing it and the Senate agreeing, and then the President signing.
So the blame for the deficit is literally Congress, and of course, right now it's Democrat, and Obama's running that.
So it's a Democrats in Congress and Obama, because the Republicans can't stop anything.
They don't have the votes in either house to do it.
They are responsible for it.
Who's regulating them?
These clowns that can't turn a profit with any government enterprise they run.
In fact, that's not even the question.
How many things they run do they not destroy?
They've destroyed the black family with uh the Great Society and the war on poverty.
They've destroyed countless lives.
With all these so-called good intentions, but who the hell is regulating them?
Well, we are supposed to every two years at the ballot box.
But that's a long time when you've got a you got dominant one party rule this way that doesn't even care about following the Constitution when enacting many of its uh proposals and uh and laws.
You gotta take a break.
We'll continue right after this.
Having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have Rush Limboy and the excellence in broadcasting network.
President Bush in Erie, Pennsylvania last night said government does not create wealth.
The major role of government is to create an environment where people take risks to expand the job rate in the United States.
He got huge cheers on that.
He weighed in on some of the uh most pressing issues of the day, the election in Iran, the uh the erection uh the election at Fox News Channel, the uh closing of the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba.
By the way, I need to confess since so much of the media is now state controlled and state run.
I need to just say for the record that I am not on a government payroll.
Uh the administration's interrogation policies of terrorists held at Gitmo and elsewhere.
The uh former president has not commented on Obama's decision to ban enhanced interrogation techniques like waterboarding, which the current president has called off base and based on fear.
Uh Mr. Bush said the way I decided to address the problem was twofold.
One, use every technique and tool within the law to bring terrorists to justice before they strike again.
Uh and uh uh also said that I'm not I'm not gonna criticize my successor, and then he did.
I'll just tell you that there are people at Guantanamo that'll kill American people at a drop of a hat, and I don't believe that persuasion, that persuasion is not gonna work.
Therapy isn't gonna cause terrorists to change their mind.
So um is is fine fighting back here, and I I I've really liked this.
I wish this administration, we can wish and wish and wish it won't change anything.
It would have just been fine if they had done a little bit more of this while President Bush was in office.
Let's see.
Oh.
I was just talking about the call we got yesterday.
We're gonna get to the phones very quickly if you're on hold.
Hang on.
I was talking yesterday about the call we got from Jeremy.
Angry he was from uh uh Ohio, 33 years old.
Family tricked him into voting for Obama.
Well, they pressured him into voting for Obama.
Now he's upset and like Obama, but not for the reasons we all would think.
He sees Obama helping the private sector.
He sees Obama spending and sending all kinds of money to these places.
He didn't see until I told him that Obama was destroying it.
What he wanted, what he expected was Obama sending him money.
The little guys.
And here's another story.
Same thing the caller said yesterday.
I mean, it's as if every time Obama takes over a company.
His voters see him as some kind of a supercapitalist instead of a super socialist.
No wonder his approval numbers, by the way, they're coming down.
58% in uh one poll, 56% at NBC, 58% in another.
Coming down, dude.
Leveling off Chuck Todd, F. Chuck Todd at NBC says the honeymoon's over.
I wonder if it was good for Chuck as it Was for Obama.
Seriously, every time he takes over a section of the private sector, these people think he's some supercapitalist.
Is there there has to be a fundamental ignorance or lack of understanding of what Obama is doing.
And I g I guess the uh the state run media doing a far better job than I assumed, because Obama's taking over.
He's depleting funds from the private sector, just the opposite is perceived.
This is from the Wall Street Journal today.
Laura Zamora, 40 of Orange, California, voted for Mr. Obama, but says she is frustrated by the economy and finds her support for the president waning.
She says she's facing a possible layoff as a local government worker in California.
He's bailing out the private sector.
He's putting all kinds of money into the private sector, says Mrs. Zamora.
The money should be going to social programs, not to bailing out banks and General Motors.
It should be going to people who are unemployed.
It should be going to people like me.
This story is filled with other people who look at Obama's moving s movements exactly the same way.
We're gonna have to recalibrate the way we we we comment on this.
If if if uh guy from yesterday was uh representative of a large number of people, and if uh Mrs. Mora here is also voted for him and starting to get unhappy with him, but not for the reasons that they ought to be.
We'll take it.
Don't misunderstand.
We'll take the anger.
But it's disappointing in in many ways.
It does show these people expected Obama to send them money.
They expected him to fund that that was the hope and change.
Money on social programs to help them.
Oh well, we'll comment further.
I gotta go to the phones because people have been waiting.
We're doing open line Friday on Thursday today.
Oh, looky here, Port St. Lucy.
We have some Port St. Lucie, Florida.
Heidi, I can't tell you how excited I am to have you on the program.
Hello.
I'm so excited to talk to you too, Russ.
Thank you.
I wanted to paint Rush for president and Sarah Palin for vice president on the back of my van, but my boyfriend won't let me.
Anyways, um, what's Obama gonna threaten to chop our heads off if we don't wear underwear?
Uh well, that's not an Obama proposal.
This this is this is in uh Brooksville, Florida.
Do you know where that is?
Yes, my ex-mother-in-law lives there.
Yes, I know that we're sitting uh how far your mother-in-law lives there.
Uh does she work for the government there by any chance?
No, no, no.
Okay, then she's exempt from the mandatory underwear rule.
All right.
Now, where how far is Brooksville from uh Port St. Lucie?
I don't know.
It's across the state, on the other side of the state.
Well, no, Orlando's in the middle of the state.
It can't be across the state.
Okay, north of Orlando.
I didn't bother to Google map it, uh I thought you would know.
All right, well, anyway, the city government in Brooksville is requiring all city employees to A use deodorant.
They didn't specify anti-perspirant or deodorants, they just said deodorant, and that everybody wear underwear and they can't wear it outside.
The underwear has to be worn under the normal days attire.
Well, how are they gonna enforce that?
Well, I mean that's a very good question, Heidi.
I'm I'm I'm really proud of you for coming up with that given that you're in Port St. Lucy.
Okay, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Hold on.
I'm from originally from West Palm, born in Palm Beach Gardens, and there's a lot of very wonderful conservative Republicans in Port St. Lucy.
All right.
Well, okay.
So you're really you you want you want this audience to know you're not a native of Port St. Lucy.
No.
But a Floridian.
All right, fine.
Okay, so bottom line is you asked the same question I asked, which ought to thrill you, and that is how in the hell are they gonna be able to enforce the mandatory underwear rule without having people take their clothes off?
Exactly.
They can't.
I mean, the o the easiest people to see wear an underwear or not are are obese women who wear spandex.
Yeah.
Then you can if you can see panty lines, but other than that, I I don't know how you do it.
I don't know either.
Unless you act like Bill Clinton or whatever.
Well, that's an idea.
That's a bring real Bill Clinton into sniff around.
Uh his nose alone could detect whether or not there's underwear.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, exactly.
Well, I you know what?
You are you're with it.
Yeah, we are.
You're with it.
All right.
Uh look, Heidi, thanks much for the call.
Uh You have a great day.
You do the same thing.
What kind of van do you have, by the way?
A Dodge Caravan.
Dodge caravan.
I would have an F 350 with six tires if I could.
And we'd draw for oil, too, if we could, believe me.
I do believe you.
Uh I'd I uh you sound like our kind of babe.
Yes, thank you.
You bet.
All right, have a fine day out there, and we'll take a brief time out.
Don't go away much more straight ahead here on the EIB network.
I have here yet another story.
My formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
That illustrates perfectly the decline of a once great empire.
This is from the UK Daily Mail.
Police are making unjustified and almost certainly illegal searches of white people to provide racial balance to government figures.
Lord Carlisle, the independent reviewer of terror laws, said he knew of cases where suspects were stopped by officers even though there was no evidence against them.
He warned that the cops were wasting time and money by carrying out these self-evidently unmerited searches, which were an invasion of civil liberties and almost certainly unlawful.
Police in the UK in Great Britain, illegally stopping white people just to balance it out.
Just thinking, eh, we got we're not, we're not discriminating here.
And they're just saying, okay, white guy, stop him.
Log it.
White woman, stop her.
Log it.
How many more we need here?
Ten?
Glenn, log them.
Not really charging it with anything.
That that is the decline of a once great empire.
And so much is happening to that once great empire.
It's just amazing.
Let's go back to February 22nd.
I want you to hear me on this program.
You know, I love going back to these archival sound bites of me.
It's the only way I get to hear myself.
You people get to hear me three hours a day.
I'd have to listen to tape and so forth.
But here, what I said, because people were asking me all over the place.
Hey, Rush, don't you really think it'd be good if the U.S. elects a black president?
That's the end of racism.
People can say that we know no longer racist, and that's what I warned people about here.
If Obama gets elected president, wouldn't it be good to just get this done, Rush, so that we can end the civil rights squabbles that we're having?
It wouldn't do that.
Folks, it wouldn't do that.
It might even exacerbate them.
Let me explain how.
It takes somebody like me who can read the stitches on the fastball.
Let us fast forward to January of 2009.
Obama has been inaugurated president.
And he proposes his first bit of legislation.
And let's say that it's I don't know, some civil rights-oriented thing, and a bunch of people start howling.
You know that the race industry can't wait for this.
Any criticism of Obama, the first black president, is going to be met with charges of racism by the likes of the Reverend Jacks and Sharpton.
It will make their race business all that much more prominent.
It will operate on the premise that half of this country is seething.
Can't believe this is happened, and they're gonna fix this somehow.
Cannot believe there's a black man in the White House and a black woman in the residence.
That'll be the theme that the race business operates on.
It'll be full of presumptuousness and projection, but it'll propel it.
That's February 22nd, 2008.
I nailed it.
Last night, CNN, the leader of the NAA L C P is on with Campbell Brown, who had the lowest rating CNN's ever had the other night in the 2554 demographic, something like seventy-five thousand viewers.
Do you realize that's not even one-tenth of what we have in New York City on this program.
At any rate, she is talking to the NAALCP's Benjamin Todd Jealous.
And she said the chairman of the Republican Party.
He has said he wants to reach out to more minorities.
Does he have a chance to do things like this when you continue to hear things like this racist emails that she's supposedly getting?
And here's what Benjamin Todd Jealous says.
You have Rush Limbaugh out there very aggressively with this kind of retrograde tone, trying to resurrect a day that will no longer just isn't possible for sort of a white male-dominated society.
They need to push and move beyond that.
The folks who are kind of sitting there in the shadows, very much part of the base of the Republican Party, who do believe in uh Lincoln's dream of one united country, need to come out and support their chairman.
If not, that party will just become less and less relevant over the next few years.
Hey, Benjamin, don't you want that to happen?
Wouldn't you like the Republican Party to become less and less relevant?
Just go away.
But here, he's accusing me of opposing Obama because I don't like a black guy in the White House.
I predicted this about a year and a half ago.
Benjamin Todd Jealous of the NAA LCP.
Yeah, Brooke Limbaugh out there, very aggressively, this kind of retrograde tone, trying to resurrect a day that it'll no longer be.
White male-dominated society.
He could not find one syllable to support that claim if he went through every hour of this program for the last 20 plus years.
But this is what they do.
Sick you with the racist charge, irresponsibly and without fact, because nobody's got the guts to stand up.
So you can't see that because they're minorities, they get away.
They can't be, they can't be racist, you see.
They don't have the power to implement their racism.
But this is a pure racist allegation.
It's bilge, it's dribble.
And it's something that I called the next question from Campbell Brown.
Well, you have a black president, you have a Latino nominated to the Supreme Court.
A lot of people are going to say you need to be focusing on the progress here and not on the setbacks.
What do you say to that?
We celebrate on the Supreme Court and some black and white but black, white Latino, but we also have a real commitment to just people, just regular everyday people.
And the reality is that their lives haven't changed as much as the Obamas have changed.
Their lives haven't changed as much as so do my ores has changed.
So in order to keep that sort of church.
Well then I tell you victories and firsts and breaking down barriers happening.
Unfortunately, you've got to keep pointing out the problems in our society.
The reality right now is that too many fathers can't find jobs, too many moms don't get paid enough at their jobs, too many kids go to schools that are an embarrassment to everything that this country stands for.
What the hell was this guy supposed to do then?
Where's the hope and change?
Mr. Jealous.
Six months in, your guy isn't making a bit of difference?
Same old America?
What did I tell you?
The election of a black president is not going to matter at all to the NAACP, which, by the way, is already irrelevant, except inside the beltway.
How come the NAALCP doesn't help these people find jobs?
How come the NAALCP isn't out there trying to help people find jobs and get better paying jobs and fix the schools and so forth?
Why are you opposing vouchers?
Why are you making Obama shut down great school systems for minorities in Washington?
Why don't you start doing something, Mr. Jealous, instead of continually whining, which is what I was talking about yesterday.
They whine and whine and whine.
They demand ref uh things get fixed.
The Democrats promise to fix it every four years.
They never get fixed.
The same complaints, the same whining for 50 years.
It all gets blamed on Republicans and me.
You know, things have changed for sold in my order, that's great, but not much for other Latinos.
And things have really changed for the Obamas, but not much for other African Americans.
So it doesn't mean anything.
And several civil rights civil civil rights leaders prior to the election, during the campaign, even admitted this.
So this is the NAA LCP, the race industry, as I predicted six eighteen months ago.
This is how they're keeping it alive.
We have another day-old story for you out of Brooksville, Florida.
It takes a day for news to get out of Brooksville.
This is the place, by the way, where city workers are now required to wear underwear and deodorant when going to work.
Brooksville woman showed her displeasure with neighbors by walking around a yard with no clothes on, showing everything until she was finally arrested.
Marilyn Insajari was charged with exposure of sexual organs, a misdemeanor, and booked into the county jail.
She'd uh arguing with her neighbors about something, so to get them back, she was just walking around a neighborhood nude.