All Episodes
Previous Next
June 15, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:39
June 15, 2009, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program documented to be almost always right in 99.1% of the time.
However, the views expressed by the host on this program may not represent the staff nor management of this station.
Even after 20 years, there are holdouts.
But soon we'll have them all in the fold.
Our telephone number, if you want to join us, 800-282-2882-8222.
Email address, L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
I'm going to go out on a limb here.
I don't think Obama's going to get his national health care.
We got too many forces aligned up against it.
He's got some defections within his own party on this public option business.
I do not believe.
I just and plus the doctors are tired of being the villains here.
I don't think that he's going to get away with getting the AFA.
He may get the AMA as a group, you know, too, like getting a union leader group to endorse what he's doing, but the rank and file on the AMA, the doctors of this country are tired of being considered the villains in health care.
And it's only going to get worse for them.
If we get this this uh this public option, this uh government-run healthcore health care.
So I I if if I were you, uh, ladies and gentlemen, I'd uh you know, don't give up on this one.
Uh and and I Tao, another reason I think this is gonna uh gonna go down to flames.
You know, Mrs. Clinton's health care plan was gonna take years and years and years to roll out.
Obama's trying to get this done in two months.
He's trying to get it all taken care of in one piece of legislation.
And they're just and the closer this gets to 2010, which is an election year for a lot of Democrats in the House, uh more problematic.
That's why he wants to do it now.
By the way, uh this guy Dan Kildy in Flint, Michigan, who came up with the idea of bulldozing 40% of Flint, Michigan, and turning the land over to nature.
We did some quick research on Dan Kildy.
And by the way, Obama likes his plan.
The government, they want it they want Kildy now to look at doing this in 50 American cities.
Dan Kildy, lifelong liberal Democrat politician.
He's now on the Flint, Michigan Town Council, and the UK telegraph article says that.
His uncle Dale Kildee is the same Liberal Democrat politician, as now the congressman from the Fifth District of Michigan.
The Kildy family is a family of lifetime government and political workers, not that we can find anyway a second in the private sector.
And that's who wants to bulldoze 40% of Flint, Michigan.
Not rebuild it, not reinvigorate it, bulldoze it.
And Obama loves the plan so much, hey, Dan, figure out how we can do this in 50 other American cities.
It was just last week that Evan Thomas of Newsweek called President Obama a sort of god.
This week in Newsweek, Robert Samuelson, also a columnist for the Washington Times, has a piece called Obama's Unhealthy Reform.
And here's the lead.
It's hard to know whether President Obama's health care reform is naive, hypocritical, or simply dishonest.
Probably it's all three.
The president keeps saying it's imperative to control runaway health spending.
He's right about that, but the trouble is that what's being promoted as health care reform almost certainly won't suppress spending and quite probably will do the exact opposite.
How much healthier today's uninsured would be with government coverage is unclear.
They already receive health care.
116 billion dollars worth in 2008, estimates families USA and advocacy group.
Some is paid by the uninsured themselves, 37%, some by government, some paid by uh by charities.
The remaining uncompensated care is either absorbed by doctors and hospitals or shifted to higher private insurance premiums.
Some uninsured would benefit from coverage, others would not.
Either they're healthy or they would get ineffective care.
Robert Samuelson, same magazine that referred to Obama as a sort of God.
Last week, now says he's lying or naive, or hypocritical.
Probably all three.
Back to the audio sound bites.
Let's see.
This is uh where are we gonna pick this uh audio soundbite number 10?
Make sure.
Hang on, let me get to the next page.
Yep.
Number 10 and 11 coming up here.
This is me, a short time, just a month ago, May 13th, behind the golden EIB microphone.
There's no way that these health benefits are not going to be taxed.
One way or a couple of ways.
There's no way.
There are going to be taxes income to you, imputed income to you, or they're going to eliminate the uh tax deductibility, and maybe a combination of both.
It's too great a source of money, and they don't have any.
And they want national health care.
And they're going to tell everybody only the rich are going to be paying this tax anyway, not you.
As they lie to you again.
Yesterday on Meet the Press, David Gregory to Joe Biden.
Will the president sign a bill that taxes health care benefits for employees?
We've made it clear we do not think that is the way to go.
We think that is the wrong way to finance this legislation.
So if the bill comes with that, no, the president wouldn't sign.
I didn't say that.
Now that happened pretty quickly.
Let me let me read that to you.
Because this is, you know, Biden's learning here from O'Biden or vice versa.
Obama, I'm sorry.
We made it clear we do not think taxing health care benefits is a way to go.
We think that's the wrong way to finance the legislation.
Gregory.
So if the bill comes with that, Biden, but no, no, no, no.
The president wouldn't sign it, Biden.
I didn't say that.
We don't think it's the way to go, but if we have to sign it, with that in it, if it's the only way we can get it, we'll do it.
In other words, they just want to pass it off to Congress.
They want Congress to take the heat on raising taxes on your health care benefits, that's all it is.
The downsizing of the U.S. consumer, money magazine, old, colon.
There's been one stallmart, a stalwart, the economy could count on for the past quarter century.
That's you, the American consumer.
Name any calamity in recent memory.
Savings and loan crisis, the bursting of a tech bubble, even 9-11.
Every time you, the consumer came to the rescue by opening your wallet and going shopping.
Which is what the U.S. economy is.
The American people engaging in commerce.
Rising stock prices, falling tax rates.
By the way, rising stock prices, not today.
On Friday, I believe it was Friday, the Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at uh it closed up to a point where it had wiped out all the losses in calendar 2009.
But that's gone.
It's down 195 at this moment.
And Obama's Medicare speech, his health care speech did not bring it back.
Rising stock prices, falling tax rates, seemingly endless supply of cheap credit helped.
So did a housing boom that allowed homeowners to raid their equity.
No wonder spending grew to more than 70% of GDP.
The new is this.
The plunges in housing and stocks, rising unemployment, and tighter lending standards have made the consumer the problem, not the solution.
That's the wrong way to put this.
I know what they're trying to say.
The problem is not the consumer.
The problem is that assets and wealth in the private sector are being depleted by Obama.
The economy has plunged.
The consumers are holding on to what they have for fear there are going to be more losses.
So they were trying to say that the consumer's reluctance to spend.
The consumer's reluctance to engage in commerce is now the problem where it used to be the solution.
Well, if you want to reverse that, what do you do?
What do you do?
You need to put more money in the hands of more consumers, do you not?
And how do you do that?
Well, you do not do it by raising their taxes.
You do not do it by depleting money in the private sector and transferring it to government control.
Economists don't think this behavior will change after the recession as families work to repair their finances.
As a result, the U.S. economy is likely to grow at a slower pace than its usual annual rate of three percent.
Economies in emerging markets like China will likely be the new drivers of global wealth.
All because Of the philosophy of Barack Obama and the Liberal Democrats.
You simply cannot take control of the private sector to the degree they have and want to, in even more ways, transfer that wealth to government control, and expect the private sector to grow.
The private sector by definition shrinks.
If Obama is successful in getting health care transferred to government control, all of it, that's two and a half trillion dollars.
That's one fifth of the U.S. economy.
You take two and a half trillion dollars out of the private economy, move it over to the government, guess it's gone.
And that's what he's proposing to do.
Brief time out, much more straight ahead as we continue.
Hey, folks, I don't want you to get overconfident now when uh when I postulate the health care system Obama wants is going to go down the tubes, and that he's not gonna I don't mean you should just say to yourself, all right, it's over.
It's only gonna fail if everybody keeps speaking out against it, if everybody maintains their energy level against it.
I'm just telling you, I'm getting the sense that the energy level to this point is starting to get some traction.
But don't take my my opinion here that it can be beaten back and stopped as a sign that it has been and that you don't need to get engaged or involved in it.
The North Koreans, ladies and gentlemen, are now talking about nuclear war.
After the UN sanctions, the North Koreans are saying, well, screw you, we're in a nuclear war, and the Chicoms, our buds, are saying you better not use any many, many militaristic uh uh approaches here to dealing with our friends the North Koreans.
How while everybody's looking at Iran, and everybody's looking at Obama's domestic agenda.
North Korea, front and center in terms of making news.
People at the Heritage Foundation have been reading research, insightful information at Askheritage.org for some time, and long before the people in the drive-by media, the state-run media picked up the story on North Korea.
The Heritage Foundation was producing and releasing a film called 33 Minutes.
33 minutes is the length of time it would take for a nuclear ballistic missile launched from North Korea to reach a UI a U.S. city.
33 minutes.
And Obama's talking about cutting missile defense at the same time.
This is a chilling documentary.
Makes the case for just how America can and should protect itself.
So members of the Heritage Foundation are already up to speed on the effect of Obama's budget cut request, 1.4 billion in missile defense, as being wrong at this time.
You can see highlights of this documentary at WW.askheritage.org.
Become a member.
I am a member.
And you'll be one of many other people.
And you'll be able to see many, many things that you suddenly have access to.
And you can set up a screening of this film with friends and neighbors.
AskHeritage.org.
They're doing great work there.
And this uh documentary 33 minutes is a is a great illustration.
From the San Francisco Chronicle last Thursday.
Jobs from the stimulus hard to find.
Now remember, we've already played the soundbite of uh of Biden.
So, yeah, we guessed wrong on that stimulus.
It's not going to create whatever number of jobs, not only gonna create 600,000 jobs.
Not even going to create 600,000 jobs.
There's nothing in that bill that creates a single job counts.
President Obama announced that the 787 billion dollar porculus bill had created or saved 150,000 jobs in his first 100 days, and will create or save 600,000 more in the next 100 days.
Good luck finding them.
And the story goes on to describe people who are out of work and are looking for all these jobs that are supposedly being promised by all this stimulus spill spending, and they aren't there.
And of course they're not there.
Have you seen unemployment?
It's up to 9.4% after Obama's stimulus bill.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Rush.
Yeah.
PB Ditto's.
Thank you, sir.
You're welcome.
Um, I know something about health insurance because most of my or much of my adult life I've carried my own policy.
And Obama is setting up this straw man.
President Obama, I should say, is setting up this straw man about pre existing conditions.
Pre existing conditions is something it's not so much something you have as something you know you have.
It's something that has to be diagnosed previously, or it's something that a reasonable person would have to seek medical attention for.
And President Obama is making it out that a person can be denied coverage.
A person cannot be denied coverage because of pre existing conditions.
Treatment can be denied for a period of time.
But my son is disabled.
He's blind and he's deaf.
I'm nervous, Rush.
He's blind, he's deaf, he has a heart condition, he needs support in all areas of living.
And last year New Jersey canceled his Medicaid.
So I called my insurance company and I said I being a reasonable or uh a responsible person, and I said I needed a a policy for my son.
So I explained to them that he's disabled and that he takes a lot of medicine, but I was still able to buy coverage for him.
And not only was I able to buy coverage for him, but because he had Medicaid going, I uh uh w there was no uh nothing against his pre existing conditions.
All right.
Now that's an excellent point.
And is an ex and I'll tell you something else.
If you didn't have that private option, you'd be SOL.
You wouldn't be able to get insurance for your kid from the government.
And then and not only rush, not only could they not deny him coverage, they can't even charge him more.
The the charge is based on the now you're gonna have a lot of people out there.
We're gonna get a lot of calls from people who have pre existing condition limitations put on them and are gonna disagree with what you're saying.
I just want to prepare you for that.
If we get some, we'll put 'em on because a lot of people this this is this is very strange what you're saying to a lot of people who have been bitten by this pre existing condition rig of role.
I I I live in New Jersey.
I've done this in New York and I've done it in New Jersey.
I can't speak to all 50 states.
His premium was exactly the same.
They have a rate chart, it goes by the county you live in, and it goes by your age.
Now, uh here's something else.
Another point I want to make about this.
Did you hear the description that Walter gave of his son?
He's disabled in practically every way you can be.
He's blind.
He's deaf.
He's got a heart problem and some...
Now that is the kind of condition for which we need reasonable insurance.
We don't need health insurance or people to go to the doctor for a sore throat.
We don't need 50 tests when you have a sore throat, or however any tests they give you.
But it's this kind of unusual, out-of-the-ordinary condition that ought to be the first that's insured, and take a lot of other people off the insurance rolls who can pay for this by themselves, and then you will lower premiums for everybody, and you'll cover the people who actually need because this man with his with his son's condition, there's no family that could afford the kind of cover the kind of uh uh medical bills that this this this young man's gonna require.
That's what you need catastrophic insurance for.
And it's conditions like his, his kids that are the hardest to insure because everybody else is being insured for things, and they have to draw the line, okay, you've got a pre existing condition here, or you've got well, I mean, uh why should we insure this life expectancy here all that sort of stuff.
But if you if you lower the cost pressure, the price pressure of some of these other insurance policies that are not even necessary.
Now the insurance company may not like hearing me say this.
I mean, they love the premiums.
But it still, I mean, this is the you know, when you when you talk about a a responsible health care system, This is it.
We don't we don't need insurance for nine people.
Six people to make twenty six hundred visits, nine people to make twenty six hundred visits to a a single emergency room in six years.
This is uh oh it's so out of whack.
But this pre existing condition.
Look, I have pre existing conditions.
We all do.
I'm fifty-eight years old.
I've got I'm able to get I have to have uh every year key man insurance uh in order to do this program since I'm it.
If I go, so goes the show.
So I have to get insurance for that.
You would not believe the physical I have to take for this.
And it shows up pre existing conditions.
Uh the premium is what it is.
You go to get the best price you can, but the point is I can get it.
It's out there.
I wonder what would happen to key man insurance when the government's running it, especially mine.
Back to the phones we go.
And Shauna in Spring, Texas.
Great to have you here on the EIB network.
Hi.
Hi, Rush.
I'm so excited to talk to you.
Thank you.
I am a doctor in Texas, and I was listening to Barry's speech, and he he says that doctors will be better off because if we don't, prices are gonna skyrocket, premiums will go up, and our practices will suffer.
But if you listen to what he said, he said that a large part of this will be paid by um reimbursements being based on outcomes and best practices, which means that if a patient doesn't get a perfect outcome, they're gonna just deny the claim.
And this already happens.
Yeah, but what that's bad enough.
But who's in charge of deciding the best outcome?
Exactly.
Two people the trial lawyers and Barack Obama.
Mm-hmm.
Well, and I'll give you an example that's already happens.
With Medicare, if you have a patient in the hospital and she needs a catheter in her bladder for days at a time, and she gets an infection from that catheter, even though having it in with the standard of care, Medicare will deny the whole admission and not pay for anything if she gets an infection.
How common are bladder infections with a catheter?
All the time.
When you give antibiotics and you do everything right and everything perfect, it's going to happen sometimes.
Okay.
And so the whole example is the whole admittance, everything to do with it can be denied.
Yes, and that happens every day.
So doctor basically works in the hospital's office when it works for nothing.
Uh-huh.
Yep.
And Obama says this is gonna get worse if we don't do his plan.
Yeah.
So it it just worse for us.
Cut to the chase.
You're a doctor.
You heard Obama's speech.
Are you uh inspired?
Absolutely not.
Quite the contrary.
I don't believe anything he said about cost.
Are you a member of the AMA?
No.
All right.
Uh well, you know about them, I'm sure.
I I do, but they're a little too liberal for me.
Well, it's like the American Bar Association.
It is a bunch of commie bastards.
Uh in a way.
They are.
They are just a bunch of commie bastards anymore.
The ABA leadership, American Bar Association, tort lawyers run the whole thing.
And I just wonder if the if the AMA is is uh, you know, the similar special interest group.
Uh all Obama has to do is promise the AMA some money.
You know, there's there's all kinds of leverage he has over with with that group.
And then of course the drive-by's, the state-run media can go to the AMA, report whatever one person there says, and make the country think that's the opinion of every doctor.
So we'll see how this shakes out.
Thanks, Shauna.
Dick sa in Northampton, Massachusetts.
Your turn.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
I was thinking a good headline for that Flint story would be destroy it and increase its value.
Uh what's the headline?
Well, that's the head that would be a good headline for the story.
Destroy something and increase its value.
Oh, I see what you mean.
Yeah, well they want to bulldoze if you've missed this, they want to bulldoze forty percent of uh Flint because apparently forty percent of the town uh has homes that are boarded up, foreclosed on and so forth, so they want to bulldoze it and turn that land over to nature uh and and downsize the uh the city.
I mean, that's just something I've I'm not ever thought I would see in America.
Well, we had urban renewal and back in the sixties, and there's cities that are still suffering from that.
Yeah.
Okay, it's a good way.
Another form of urban renewal.
And we knew we know who got renewed, by the way.
Yeah.
And they weren't renewed.
Well, the the reason I called Rush was I've been thinking about the first chance that the electorate will have to put the brakes on the government is of course the congressional elections in in 2010.
That's right.
And uh I was thinking, where could we get some candidates that would have name recognition and uh not to too heavily identified with a party would have the skills and everything that I would how would it go to encourage disenfranchised car dealers, of which there are five, an average of five in every congressional district, to take up the run for Congress.
They have the uh mailing lists, local contacts, are known locally, people evidently trust them if they've been customers of them.
Yeah, but see, look, if if if a disenfranchised car dealer runs for office, how many voters are gonna trust the sticker price of the vote?
Well, they have a b as good a chance as they have trusting that the the uh uh sticker price on the vote that they're gonna get and otherwise.
Well, look, uh I I I like your thinking.
I like the fact that you are thinking, because there are a lot of disgruntled dis disenfranchised their businesses.
It's been taken away from them by Barack Obama who doesn't want to run the car business.
Doesn't want to run the banks, he doesn't want to run health care.
He's got enough on his plate, he's got a run, he's got a rock, he's got uh North Korea, he's got Afghanistan, he doesn't want to run all this stuff, but he doesn't make any speeches about any of that other stuff.
He runs around and makes sales pitch speeches on all this domestic stuff that he wants to control.
Well, it will depend on who the candidates are, but look, let me remind you again Gallup poll out today, 40 percent, and this is the largest percentile.
Forty percent of American voters identify themselves as conservatives, 21 percent identify themselves as liberals.
About twenty-two percent of that forty percent is Democrat conservatives.
So all conservatives after all the Republican Party has to do is run a full bore conservative campaign.
And they'll pick up that 40 percent.
That's why I said if i i if the Republicans had nominated a conservative in 2008, Obama could have been beaten.
And this is why this is why the left, you know, don't listen to people on our side who rip Sarah Palin.
Don't listen to Republicans who rip Sarah Palin.
Listen to Democrats.
Listen to liberals.
They'll tell you who they're afraid of.
They tell you who they're afraid of by trying to destroy them.
If they thought Sarah Palin was the easiest slam dunk defeat they could ever engineer, they would be talking her up.
They'd be they're scared to death.
She can draw 20,000 people, as it was said earlier today by somebody reading a cookbook.
There's no other Republican candidate that that enthused and energized crowd that way.
So just listen to the left.
Just listen to the Democrats.
Forty percent of the people identify themselves as conservative.
And people say, well, if that's the case, how did Obama win?
I can give you a number of factors.
Bush fatigue.
There was no conservative on the ballot to vote for.
And the whole notion of change parties.
Let's just change it.
It's been eight years.
Everybody hates a Republicans that change parties.
A lot of conservatives stayed home, but sixty million people did not vote for Obama.
Fifty-eight, sixty million people did not vote.
We got to get rid of Reagan, they say.
Reagan got fifty-eight percent of the vote in two thousand uh uh in nineteen nineteen eighty-four.
Fifty-eight percent.
What was Reagan?
It was a conservative.
I get blue in the face talking about this stuff.
So simple.
It really is so simple.
And the people who think they're the smartest people in the room have to get in there and start monkeying around with something that's not complicated to try to prove how smart they are or whatever else they're trying to establish within the blueprints there.
And the base is ready to go.
The right candidates.
So if you're uh if if you are a Republican, if you're thinking for running, I don't care what part of the country you live in either, by the way, forget this Northeast garbage.
Might have to exempt Massachusetts, but I doubt it.
Certainly maybe Maine.
If you're a Republican and you want to win and you want to run for office in 2010, be conservative.
And don't make any excuses for it.
And don't apologize for it.
Just run as a conservative on the principles.
Apply the principles to today's issues, and that ain't gonna be hard because it's the easiest thing in the world to contrast conservatism with socialism.
And that's what Barack Obama and the Democrat Party is.
Lincoln in New Orleans.
Great to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Rush, great great to talk with you.
I just wanted to uh respond to a very perceptive comment you made regarding Obama according to AMA.
Obama obviously is doing this as a public relations ploy to get them to sign on board to his version of health care reform.
Right.
Now what the public does not understand is that the AMA does not represent America's position.
The AMA has to put it, let's to put it kindly, has always been very, very supportive of uh politicians.
Wait, wait, wait, wait.
Hold it, hold it a second.
I missed a word.
Did you say the AMA does not support patients?
No, the AMA has not been very supportive of or very representative of doctor's interests.
Only about twenty-five, maybe thirty percent at most of the nation's physicians are members of the AMA.
I'm a surgeon.
Um I have not been a ma AMA member for 20 years.
I think uh most of the uh surgeons in this country uh are not AMA members.
Uh so it's it's a very convenient way for Obama to go ahead, make a big uh PR splash uh in front of the convention there in Chicago, try and get the AMA to sign on board, and and ipso facto uh de facto to then extrapolate that to saying the nation's physicians support my health care plan, which is a huge, huge, huge leap of the.
Yeah, it's like the AARP claiming to represent every seasoned citizen, or the ABA claiming to represent every lawyer.
My brother's a lawyer, and I'll guarantee you, whatever the ABA says about judicial nominees, 90% of the time, my brother disagrees with.
And he's I I think my brother's a member of the AB, American Bar Association, I don't know.
Yeah, well, I think that's that's a pretty good analogy.
The AMA is the same thing, huh?
The AMA is it's it's the same thing.
You know, they've been you you doctors snicker, you know, at the AMA, and they're sure they have a core group of supporters, but as far as the rank and file physician in America being a supporter of the AMA or the AMA speaking for position, no way.
Good.
The problem is the American physicians are a very, very diverse group of people with diverse interests, so it makes it very easy uh politically to be divided and conquered.
I knew it.
I knew it.
Obama goes out there, talks to a left-wing group, left like a union leadership.
It's like saying all union members are left-wing Democrats.
They're not.
Anyway, uh there's no question he's gonna say, yeah, the AMA supports my plan, thereby try to make everybody think all the doctors do.
We've heard from you.
We heard from the woman doctor in sp in uh Spring, Texas, said she's not even a member of the AMA.
Lincoln, I appreciate the call.
I really do.
We gotta go.
We'll be back after this.
Baba do blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, doadies and gentlemen, the White House, uh, since this program has an international reach, the White House has asked us to facilitate uh the president's new policy on Miranda rights to uh terrorist attainees uh in Afghanistan or anywhere else we happen to find them.
Well, there you have the official word from the White House now on how the terrorist attaine Miranda rights are gonna work.
People are being gunned down in Iran.
We mentioned this earlier in the program.
The people are being gunned down by officials there.
And yet, this was posted this morning at the Huffington Post by somebody named Ann Wright.
While Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was making a major foreign policy speech at Tel Aviv University someday, Israeli police outside the university attacked international protesters of Israel's invasion of Gaza, illegal settlements, and the apartheid wall.
Heavy-handed police treatment of the unarmed peaceful members of Code Pink began immediately after they unfurled several pink banners that read free Gaza and End the Occupation.
Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin and New York activist Zool Zulkowitz were physically dragged across the street from their original protest site next to the entrance gate to Barrelan University where audience members and press enter the gunning people down in Iran and their peaceful protests in Israel, and that's what Code Pink and the American left media is concerned with.
One of my friends, one of my golf buddies, has a laptop computer.
He has a Mac.
He's got his uh, I think he's got the 15, 15 inch MacBook Pro.
And he has been holding out signing up for Carbonite.
He finally, last week, signed up, sent me a note.
I'm glad I'm finally doing this.
Because he did it came to grips.
The guy travels a lot and his business is on his laptop.
And it finally came to grips when he started the backup, a backup.
What could have happened all of these times?
Travels internationally, all these places.
What could have happened when he gets his computer checked by homeland security and so forth?
So he signed up for Carbonite.
And you should too if you haven't.
If you have a new computer, if you're new to the business of computers, or if you just never backed up, understand that your hard drive is gonna it's gonna fail on you.
Something's gonna happen.
It's either gonna just crash or somebody's gonna spill something on your computer.
Carbonite is an off-site online backup, and it occurs whenever you are connected to the internet.
You don't have to tell it to do it.
Set it up the first time, and it does it.
After the initial backup, it'll only back up what has changed.
Each time you log on to the internet.
And if you have a constant connection, uh, then it's always backing up.
Carbonite.com is where you go.
It's cheap, it's like $54 a year, but the first two weeks are free, first 15 days, with no credit card necessary if you use offer code rush.
So do it.
Offer code rush at Carbonite.com.
The MSNBC News Services is some wire service.
Obama plans sweeping financial regulations.
Overhaul of Wall Street, bank rules could be biggest changes since the 1930s.
He's going to roll out an overhaul of intricate rules and pay schedules and systems that govern America's financial institutions.
But he doesn't want to run anything, he says.
He doesn't want to run it.
He doesn't want to run the business of health, he don't want to run the car companies.
But he does.
He wants to grab as much from the private sector as he can, deplete the private sector of its value of its capital and transfer it to government.
He does and plans the opposite of what he says.
We'll be back.
From uh the state-run media and Reuters.
Children under four years of age fare better in car accidents when they are riding in rear facing rather than forward-facing seats.
This, according to a report published online in the British Medical Journal.
Infants are typically switched from a rear to forward-facing seat when they reach about 20 pounds, which occurs at roughly eight months of age for an average boy, according to the studies.
uh um I mean, there's so many examples of the libs being able to get nothing right.
A four-year-old, an eight-year-old or four-month-old, eight-month-old riding backwards?
Do you know most a lot of people cannot ride backwards?
It makes them sick to their stomach.
Why don't they put backwards-facing seats on airplanes, folks?
Because people get sick.
Wouldn't you think you'd be safer riding backwards that fast in an airplane?
Instead of forwards, the car seat would have to be the size of a refrigerator.
You can't put a kid facing backwards in one of these little lawnmower cars that Obama is going to build.
How in the hell does that fit in with the carbon footprint of the putt putt?
Leave us alone.
We'll take care of our own kids in the car.
It's none of your business.
▲
Export Selection