All Episodes
Previous Next
June 5, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:28
June 5, 2009, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program are now documented to be almost always right, 99.1% of the time.
It's Rush Limbaugh, the EIB Network, and Friday.
Live from the Southern Command in Sunny South Florida.
It's open line Friday.
Open line Friday, Little Phones.
The program is all yours.
I don't care what you talk about.
You can talk about anything in the world, even if I don't care about it.
On Friday, I will fake it.
That's the point of Open Line Friday.
To let you take this show where you think it ought to go.
Monday through Thursday, phone callers are required to talk about things I care about.
Here's the number if you want to get in on it.
800.
Lrushbo at EIB net.com.
From the New York Daily News today, uh Dawn Cardi, D-A-W-N-C-A-R-D-I, Dawn Cardi, looms very large in the life of Sonia Sotomayor.
She constantly refers to her in speeches as her watchdog to make sure she is doing the right thing.
And then there's a web link here about uh Sotomayor sharing joy with her best friend.
Uh and it's uh daily news headline.
This is from Friday, May 29th.
Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor open will follow the law on abortion, says friend.
Sotomayor has never made a major ruling on the issue of abortion.
This we know, she remains mum about what she thinks, what she believes.
She understands how difficult it is for a woman to decide whether to have an abortion.
She knows women who have struggled with the choice.
Years ago we spoke about abortion, about how difficult a choice it is, says Dawn Cardi, a lawyer and one of her closest friends.
Very, very, very, very difficult choice.
We discussed how difficult it must be.
Ask directly if Sotomayor believes a woman has a right to choose an abortion, Cardi said she will follow what she thinks is the law on that, and her personal beliefs will not interfere with that analysis.
Because my view of her is that she does not allow her personal beliefs to interfere with her analysis of legal issues.
Now now she clearly does.
She has said that her personal beliefs impact her decisions because she said that judges, appellate judges make policy.
Now, the reason why I think something's going on here, Soda Myor is a liberal.
She faces no problem being confirmed.
She's got a majority of Democrats on the uh Senate Judiciary Committee, a majority of Democrats in the Senate.
Most Libs are eager to tell you about their Roe vs.
Wade beliefs, their their abortion beliefs.
She would not.
Her confirmation would not suffer had it been known over the years what her opinion on this was, and yet she's gone to great lengths to keep it quiet.
She has gone to great lengths, ladies and gentlemen, to have it an open question.
We know what she thinks of affirmative action.
We know what she thinks of a lot of other public issues by virtue of her rulings and what she's written.
But on this one issue we don't know, and I would think that if, for example, she is pro-life.
She's probably calculating that could do more harm to her than by admitting she's pro-choice.
Am I correct?
And this is a he dealing with liberals here that are going to vote on her.
So it'd be no no pain, no harm.
She might get some grief about telegraphing the way she's going to rule on an issue.
And I know that that no nominee comes out and says what they think about this.
She hadn't said what she thinks about it ever.
And I'm just in my instincts tell me that it's because people who are her friends on other issues might not appreciate what she really thinks about abortion.
So as I have continued to delve into this, as I have continued to um investigate and research this and try to get to the quick, try to get to the soul of this where she comes down on it.
I have to say that there's a better than 50-50 shot.
She's pro-life.
She Catholic.
I know that some Catholics are pro-choice, don't misunderstand.
Puerto Rican Catholic, but my gut instinct tells me that all the factors are there.
It certainly could not hurt her with her own people for it to be known.
It could only harm her with her own people if she's pro-life and she's staying mum on it.
Zipped lips.
So I can't, I can't say for sure, but it sure seems to me that uh it's not.
Well, you know, I've said that I've uh I that life is such an important issue.
I mean, it if yeah, you can if if I learned could be relatively certain and assured that she thinks Roe is bad constitutional law and is a pro-life individual, you'd have to stop and consider maybe supporting that.
You get you get you can get past the racism and bigotry in other things, but life is that's fundamental issue.
Once once the nation, and some would say we're there, once the nation has thrown out the whole concept of the sanctity of life, then every other value and tenet of morality is weakened dramatically.
So, yeah, uh I know it would be controversial, but I I could see I could see being in favor of this nomination.
Were she pro-life?
Certainly could.
Another one more story here about uh Barack Obama at Vukenball today.
Actually, it was in Weimar, Germany.
President uh this is from uh government run AP Barack Obama witnessed the Nazi ovens of the Buchenwald concentration camp on Friday, its clock tower frozen at the time of liberation.
Buchenwald uh teaches us, Obama said, that we must be ever vigilant about the spread of evil in our own time.
That we must reject the false comfort that others suffering is not our problem, and commit ourselves to resisting those who would subjugate others to serve their own interests.
Evil must be confronted, Obama said.
Somebody help me out.
Did he say that in Cairo yesterday?
Are you sure, Mr. Snerdley?
Are you sure he didn't say evil must be confronted in his speech in Cairo?
My memory is like yours.
My memory is that he he wasn't that that was not a theme, it was not a focal point.
This is why I think Angela Merkel was fuming standing there next to the guy.
He's sitting there ripping Germany for 65 years ago.
One day after going to the county seat of military terrorism around the world, the Middle East, and doesn't talk about evil.
I if I if I were Merkel, I'd be mad too.
I'm mad as it is.
Sarah Palin.
Sarah Palin was, let's see, in Alaska.
Michael Reagan went up there for a speech, and she introduced Michael Reagan.
Sarah Palin in Alaska yesterday.
Friends, we need to be aware of the creation of a fearful population and a fearful lawmakers being led to believe that big government is the answer.
To bail out the private sector, because then government gets to get in there and control it.
And mark my words, this is going to happen next, I fear.
Bail out next, debt-ridden states, then government gets to get in there and Control the people.
Sonia.
I'm sorry, that was Wednesday, and that's that's Sarah Palin bailing out the states.
That's the next thing to happen.
And then you bail out the broadcast companies, then you own them.
And then you bail out the newspapers that need it and you own them.
And she's warned this is it's about controlling people.
And of course, it's interesting to note the Republican Party despises this woman.
The powers that be in the Republican Party, she also said this.
Since when can you get out of huge national debt by creating trillions of dollars of new debt?
It all really is so backwards and skewed as to sound like absolute nonsense.
Everybody's asking this question.
We're all asking, well, where are the American people?
We all know this is not how you do it.
Snerdley just told me a funny story.
Went back to his orifice during the uh break here at the top of the hour.
You've got a friend working at a bank, did you say?
You've got a friend working in a loan department at a bank and said, People are still coming in and said, Did you are you are you uh issuing mortgages?
Are you making home loans?
The bank says, Yes, we are.
And Snurdley's friends said, people coming in asking, can we still get a mortgage with no money down?
Can we still get a mortgage even though we can't pay it back?
See, it's amazing what people learn and what they hear and what they think is available.
Oh, we can still maybe get a mortgage without a down payment.
I gotta go brief time out.
Your phone calls next, Open Line Friday continues.
Open line Friday, as always, we try to squeeze in more phone calls on Open Line Friday than a normal regular busy broadcast day.
And we have a cell call from Joplin, Missouri.
It's Matt.
Nice to have you with us.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
Uh, Mucho Meganditos.
Thank you, sir.
That's uh first time caller, longtime listener.
It's a real pleasure to speak with you.
Thank you, sir.
Uh, wanted to just uh make a comment considering uh the uh probably one of the biggest lies of the last fifty years, this doctrine of land for peace in Israel.
Having made several trips to Israel, uh I I can tell you this uh that there's not enough land for Israel to cede to the Palestinians uh to ever pacify uh their objective.
Look at it, you know, we can dance, we can dance around this all we want.
The Israelis have already given up land, they've given they've been land for peace, they've been doing this for 60 years.
They've even given back land they conquered after having been attacked.
It's never enough because land is not what the Palestinians want.
Land is not what Hamas wants, land is not what Hezbollah wants, land is not what Iran wants for them.
What they want is no Jews.
That's it exactly.
They will not be happy until every Jew is gone from uh Israel.
That is their objective.
I know.
It's it's plain and simple.
You're not gonna have you never have peace.
There's not uh somebody find for me a genuine negotiated peace.
Find for me, you don't have peace.
This is the limbaugh doctrine.
You don't have peace until one side is defeated and thus surrenders.
And until that happens here, there's not going to be peace.
How in the world does anybody in their right mind preach to the Israelis about what to do after what they've already done when Mahmood Ahmadinezad at least once a week threatens to annihilate them.
He's nuking up, and Obama has granted permission for Iran to go ahead and build up nuclear power.
Under the premise, of course, that they don't weaponize.
Well, we told the North Koreans the same thing.
Nobody's gonna stop Iran from doing whatever they're gonna do.
It's painfully obvious now, is it not?
Nobody's gonna stop the Iranians.
So even if they sign a piece of paper, okay, fine, all we'll do is uh we'll rev up for nuclear.
They've got more oil in Iran.
They don't need to go nuclear power.
Now it's true, they don't have any refineries.
Do you know well, they may have one that operates.
They've got to import their gasoline.
They have to export their oil to get it refined to gasoline and bring it back.
But they don't need for for the for for for I mean, in in in the strict sense of need, they don't need nuclear.
They've got oil reserves out of the wazoo.
You know, this this is the kind of thing I uh it it common sense is common sense, and this is so obvious.
This whole Middle East peace conflict is so obvious common sense-wise, that there has to be far more going on here than the average person like us can know.
Because common sense says none of what has been tried in the Middle East peace process ever worked.
So why is a continuation of the same effort, which is just a definition of insanity, then all of a sudden work.
Mystifying.
Ellen in Essex, Connecticut.
We had Ellen on the phone yesterday, we ran out of time and she let us call her back.
Ellen, thanks for letting us do that.
Great to have you back with us today.
Great to talk to you again, Rush.
It's a rainy day here, and uh I'm glad to uh talk to you about it again.
Uh let's get started from the very beginning of what you were talking about yesterday.
Yeah, well, you you were talking on and off over the course of several days about the anger.
And uh I had a theory, and I'm not surpr I don't know why you're surprised about the anger.
Um I wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, who's anger?
Uh Michelle Obama's Michelle and Barack, right.
Okay.
Um I grew up in New York.
I grew up in part I spent part of my life in the projects as well.
And by the way, I wouldn't call a co-op city the dread of the projects where Judge Sotemeyer lived.
But that's a separate issue.
I Michelle's younger than I am, um Sodemeyer's sort of my age group.
We're brought up to uh basically, you know, you have bright people, they're gonna go on to college, they're gonna get great jobs.
The difference was my peers were coached to be angry.
You know, when all things were equal, you know, you're a minority, you know, get angry about it.
Don't don't let the opportunity slip away, you know, build on the anger.
So they got the scholarships, they got the internships, they got, you know, their first jobs, and so anger became a part of their tool set, and it's so much a part of their success, and you know, like we all do, if you behave in a certain way and it's successful and you get rewarded for it, you know, continue to use it.
So when we have a whole generation of folks who are sort of coming up that have been coached this way, you know, post the civil rights era to to leverage their anger on their mistreated historical status.
I don't know why anybody's surprised they're continue to behave angry.
They've been rewarded for being angry.
Well, let me clarify.
I'm not surprised that they're angry, and I'm not surprised to hear you say that they're coached.
I would say they're taught.
Taught, okay.
They're raised, and when they get to school, it's affirmed.
Yes.
They're they're taught to be angry, they're taught that they've been cheated, they've they're taught they've been discriminated against, they're taught this country is unfair, they're c they're taught this country is unethical.
They are taught that this country is discriminatory.
They're taught that this country is immoral and unjust.
They're taught this.
But they're raised.
Don't stop it taught.
It's been reinforced with success.
That's that's that's the key here.
I mean, you can be taught a lot of things, but if you try it, I remember Wait a minute.
I remember because I did probably say Michelle Obama's first lady, what in the world is she angry?
That's that's okay.
So you're thinking why the the success then promotes or confirms the anger, did you say?
In other words, the anger became a viable tool.
It worked.
It got me to that next step.
It got my it got someone's attention.
It you know, nudged me into the right spot.
And so, like I said, you know, if you use a tool, like we all do coming up in our professions, like you know, I learned not to get too pissed off at people.
Excuse my language.
That's all right.
But uh, you know, because in business you can't go around doing that.
But you know, using that as an edge, they became successful.
And like I said, if you if you if you learn to be successful using certain techniques, you're not gonna throw them away at all of a sudden.
Okay, this is pretty good.
So anger.
It's been reinforced.
Is a tool.
Got them where they want, it got them where they want, and order to stay there, they have to stay mad.
Exactly.
Now, okay, here's the big question.
Is the anger an act or is it still genuine?
Um I don't think it would uh half my friends, it was never genuine, it was a tool.
Um, you know, most of them were like, hey, you know, I got it, I'm gonna move on, and grew out of it, but some of them some of my friends didn't grow out of it.
Actually became part of who they were.
Fine.
Then that that that's that's that's all I need to know.
Whether the anger is genuine or whether it's a tool, the fact of the matter is it is still being used.
That's why I'm right about Obama being mad.
I know I'm right about him being an angry guy, a cold angry guy.
The danger is that even those who are acting angry who really aren't there, inspiring and encouraging rage and anger in those that support them.
And that's why half this country is so bent out of shape all the time about this supposed unjustness and immorality of the country.
And that makes everybody else mad.
We have some news items here that I want to get to before the uh program unfolds.
This is from the Los Angeles Times today.
The brains of gay men resemble those of straight women, according to research being published uh next Tuesday.
That wait a second.
This story is a year old, but I'm just now coming across it.
This is June 17, 2008.
Uh the brains of gay men resemble those of straight women, according to research being published or has been published now, that provides more evidence of the role of biology in sexual orientation.
Using brain scanning equipment, researchers said they discovered similarities in the brain circuits that deal with language, perhaps explaining why gay men tend to outperform straight men on verbal skill tests, as do heterosexual women.
I didn't know that.
The area of the brain that processes emotions also look very much the same in gay men and straight women, and both groups have higher rates of depressive disorders than heterosexual men, according to researchers.
The study in proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, however, found the brain similarities were not as close in the case of gay women and straight men.
Previous studies have found evidence sexual orientations hardwired.
More than a decade ago, a neurobiologist Simon LeVay reported that a key area of the hypothalamus, a brain structure linked to sexual behavior, was smaller in gay men compared to heterosexual men.
I learned something every day.
I thought the hypothalamus had to deal with appetite, but I did also have something to do with sexual behavior.
Which maybe the two are related.
Well, according to this size matters, but we're talking about uh yeah, the small hypothalamus versus a large hypothalamus relating to sex behavior, sexual drive.
The results show that gay men had symmetrical brains like those of straight women.
And the homosexual women had slightly asymmetrical brains like those of heterosexual men.
Language circuits are thought to be more symmetrical in straight women than in hetero.
You believe people study this stuff.
No, I'm not gonna.
I don't know.
I I know symmetrical and asymmetrical, but I may not know how they're applying it here in the study of the brain.
I'm not gonna mess with that.
I'm not a neurologist, I'm not a scientist, but I'm just reading to you what it says, okay?
It's in the LA Times before the LA Times is government-run media.
So Steve Ballmer, the Microsoft chief executive, says they would move some employees offshore if Congress enacts Obama's plans to impose higher taxes on U.S. companies' foreign profits.
It makes U.S. jobs more expensive, Ballmer said in an interview.
We're better off taking lots of people and moving them out of the U.S. as opposed to keeping them inside the U.S. Typically he said a company like Microsoft develops a product like Windows in the U.S. and deducts those costs against U.S. income.
It then transfers the technology to a subsidiary in Ireland, where corporate tax rates are lower without charging licensing fees.
The company then assigns its foreign sales to the Irish subsidiary so it doesn't have to claim the income in the U.S. Obama wants to stop all of that, as he has announced, which is gonna we're gonna lose U.S. jobs.
I mean, here's Microsoft as much as uh as saying so.
This next story this this is uh I mean this is just amazing.
From senior journal.com.
Thirty states, thirty states currently have laws making adult children responsible for their parents if their parents cannot afford to take care of themselves.
These laws are rarely enforced, but there has now been speculation states might to begin dusting them off as ways to save on Medicaid expenses, says Senior Journal.com.
According to the National Center for Policy Analysis, 21 states allow a civil court action to obtain financial support or cost recovery.
Twelve states impose criminal penalties on children who do not support their parents, and three states allow both civil and criminal actions.
Now can I tell you what I find this is just amazing to me.
In the old days, and I don't mean to sound like a fuddy duddy.
In the old days, this was just a matter of course.
When your parents fell on hard times when they got sick or whatever, this is how families behaved.
It was it was beyond question.
You don't need to circle the wagons and you take care of mom and dad.
Now we need laws to do this.
And it ha it has to be mentioned here that we that we got lax LAX on the whole thing, due to being told for decades that Social Security and Medicare would take care of our patients.
See, that's the root of this.
Ever since FDR, people have been convinced that social security would handle your retirement or their retirement, and that Medicare would handle their medical benefits.
And so now nobody has planning for their retirement fully and extensively.
So now laws have to be enacted to force the the children of parents to take care of them.
Well, I mean, some of you might think it's funny.
I think it's uh you know representative here of one more degradation of the culture.
Here's my question.
One thing not in this story.
I want to know how states are gonna sue the kids to take care of their parents when the kids are still living with and off of their parents.
That's the one thing not specified in this in this story.
Jeff in Fort Lauderdale, hi, and welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Wow, I can't believe I'm on with Rush Lindball, megadiddos.
Thank you, sir.
From Fort Lauderdale.
And uh by the way, Rosh, I agree with Sean Hannity.
You look great and keep up the good work.
Thank you.
Very much.
I appreciate that.
By the I have to tell you, though, I look better than I looked on Fox.
I didn't look bad.
But T T V does add 10 or 15 pounds to you.
I look far better.
I mean it look better on my own ditto camp than on the Fox High Def cams.
No complaint.
I'm just pointing it out.
Well, you know, I think it's I think it's kind of interesting now.
You're seeing Obama not only criticizing the United States over abroad, but now even uh criticizing his own host nation that's hosting him for that particular day.
But the point I wanted to make uh uh Rush is you know, once again we see Obama setting a dangerous precedent by howtowing and placating to the Islam community, and and it's almost like the United States has its own never Neville Chamberlain, but in instead of you know giving away half the country, you know, he's giving away his own sediment, but he passes them off as the majority feel, and that's just not right.
I mean, how many times did President Bush and Vice President Cheney and the Bush administration clearly make a point that we were not at war with Islam, you know, even went out in praise and its credentials and contributions, but for some reason, you know, that wasn't good enough for for the left.
And and I guess my other point I want also to make too is that here after we have a major superpower uh addressing the Islam community.
You know, where's the next superpower that's Going to also address the Islam community.
If my memory serves me correctly, you know, we're approaching the 30th anniversary, I believe, of Russia's invasion of Afghanistan, another Muslim country.
And I don't think you'll ever hear another superpower going to the points of what we have done, and by doing so, it only weakened us even further.
Yeah, I this uh those are all good points, and and uh today, if you go to I've got a stack here, I'm not gonna have time to get through it.
And I really don't want to beat a dead horse, but more and more people are uh have now examined Obama's speech yesterday, and they're finding it reprehensible.
And you can find seven or eight Islamist groups who are dumping all over it.
Uh the Iranians are saying, their words aren't gonna stop what do you I mean the UI states is still hated in this region.
Nothing he says is going to change the fact that the U.S. is hated.
And I think that's probably true.
Obama's words are for him.
Everything this was he everything over that he was doing over there was trying to make them love him.
He needs it.
He needs the love and adulation, and the way he goes about getting the love and adulation he wants, is to rip his own country because he thinks that's what his audience wants to hear, and that's what they think.
So he's one of them.
It burns me.
It just it just it just burns me.
Let me in fact, let me give you a couple of examples.
George Joyce, American thinker today.
In his much anticipated speech in Cairo on Thursday, Barack Obama signals his willingness to consider scrapping the entire divisive edifice of affirmative action in America.
Snaredly shaking his head, that means you bought this, while discussing the record of human history as one in which groups of people have subjugated one another in pursuit of their own interests.
Obama sought to rectify this legacy or legacy of conflict and hostility by underscoring our interdependence.
Given our interdependence, any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail.
So George Joyce is saying, bye-bye, affirmative action, because what is affirmative action?
It's a point.
Sergly, he's not saying that's what Obama said.
He's saying if it's not careful that's Obama, you could have made the case here that affirmative action ought to be disbanded.
Everybody thinks he's so careful with his words and so precise, but the point is that you could you can take what he says here.
It's okay, so he's against affirmative action when he didn't intend to be.
Now the Heritage Foundation, good review, shortened to the point.
This is what you can get, by the way, if you become a member of Askheritage.org.
If you're not, if you if you don't know what the Heritage Foundation is, it's a conservative organization committed to the principles of freedom, opportunity, and prosperity.
And they make true on a promise to nearly half a million members to always keep them updated on events in the U.S. with an accurate record and the research to back it up.
You want an accurate account of Obama's visit to the Middle East in Europe, it's there.
If you want a thorough account of that trip, go to Askheritage.org, or you'll find an ongoing analysis of Obama's diplomacy.
I happen to have that analysis.
Right here in my formerly nicotine-stained fingers.
The speech was also highly problematic in many ways that will end up backfiring on the president and the United States.
Obama attacked the decision to go to war in Iraq as a war of choice.
He did, and that burned me up.
Every uh almost everything he said in that speech burned me up.
Even the good things he said, he didn't have, but on the other hand, that burned me up.
Obama attacked the decision to go to war in Iraq as a war of choice without even mentioning it.
Saddam Hussein had failed to comply with several Security Council resolutions.
This was completely gratuitous.
It was wrong and unnecessary.
Additionally, he just called the Iraq war an immoral war of choice.
We shouldn't have gone there.
There are still over a hundred thousand American troops fighting there.
What do you think?
His words will do to their morale.
They won't build it up.
Israel and Palestine.
Obama tried to connect the civil rights movement in the U.S. with Palestinian struggle on independent State.
This was a mistake because the American civil rights movement did not have the goal of destroying the United States.
While the Palestinians, including Hamas and other Islamist extremist movements, are devoted to destroying Israel.
Guantanamo, once again.
The president brought up the Guantanamo torture issue in front of an international audience, part of a ritual exercise in self-loathing that's become a hallmark of the Obama administration.
He's ended torture.
He has ended it.
Torture has always been illegal in the United States.
He didn't do one thing to make it illegal.
It already is.org.
25 bucks to join or more if you want to donate, but 25 bucks the minimum, and it is more than worth it.
To Bridgewater, New Jersey, as we continue on Open Line Friday, Leo, thank you for waiting, sir.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hey, Rush, you got a great show.
Hello?
Yeah, I appreciate that.
I'm just waiting for you.
Since it's getting towards three o'clock.
Obama goes to the Mideast to improve relations between the Moslems and us.
It's impossible.
It'sn't just a quarrel between us and the Muslims.
The Muslims are in trouble with everybody.
Look what goes on in Europe.
Bangok, a relative of the painter van Gogh, is stabbed to death on the street in Amsterdam.
This is a cartoonist pokes a little who pokes fun at all well figures.
Pokes a little fun at Mohammed.
The Danish embassies are tossed in Islamic countries.
Look what goes on India.
Mumbiar late last year.
Three years ago, Parliament in India is bombed by Muslims.
What goes on in the Philippines?
What goes on in Thailand?
Thailand has a small Muslim minority.
This is an interesting point, because, you know, you have...
You have made me look at something in a different perspective, and that is this whole speech yesterday.
Leo here is right.
The Islamists, the violent, militant Islamists, base everything they're doing on their religion.
They say everything they're doing is in their only Quran.
*clap*
And people I know who've read it say that it is.
So essentially, Obama was over there negotiating with a religion.
And how do you do that?
How do you negotiate with a religion?
Especially when you claim that you are coming from a different religion.
Made it a point to say he's a Christian, even though he has family members who were Muslims.
So he's right.
Leo said they don't the Muslims just don't have a problem with militant Islamists, not just a problem with us, but they're all over the world raising havoc.
And they claim it's their religion.
We're all infidels.
So how do you negotiate with a religion?
Think about it.
Somebody give me an answer.
I don't know how you do it.
This is too rich.
Howard Dean has been appointed as chairman of the Progressive Book Club.
And he says that his next battle will be to beat the conservative book industry.
There is no conservative book industry.
We just outsell liberals because we're better writers and it's more interesting stuff.
This is going to be every bit as successful as Air America was.
Howard Dean, moving from one irrelevance to another.
Have a great weekend, folks, and we will see you on Monday.
▲
Export Selection