All Episodes
Previous Next
April 28, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:28
April 28, 2009, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
What do you mean laughing too much about it?
I don't believe this.
This is insolence.
This is insubordination.
I have just I have just been ripped to shreds.
I've just been told what for, complete with pointing finger, that none of this is funny.
That the Air Force One flyby of the Statue of Liberty, the auto workers unions owning the automobile.
I have been warning that this was going to happen.
There's nothing we can do to stop it out there.
It is, it's I'm sorry, Robert Gibbs is hilarious.
Obama, this didn't, you know, not knowing that anybody else uh until we all saw on TV that the plane was flying under the Statue of Liberty.
I mean, it's it's it's the way the drive buyers are going, this is it's it is a joke.
It's a badge of sitcom.
It is a sitcom.
But Dawn, what are we supposed to do about it?
I mean, General Motors is caving.
General Motors has been over and grabbed the ankles.
Chrysler's been over, grabbed the ankles.
What are we supposed to do here?
Everybody's scared of Obama.
Everybody's scared of the government.
Everybody's asking, Rush, what if you, okay, you can't understand what they didn't have to take the plane up there, could have photoshopped it.
What do you think is going on?
I don't know what they're doing.
I have no idea, but I'll I wouldn't be surprised if what they were doing was collecting footage, B-roll for the next Obama for president campaign.
He may be paying for it out of the campaign.
If they do, legally, he would have to pay for it under the campaign funds for crying out loud.
That's just a phone call to George Soros.
That's no big deal.
I guarantee you that something like that is what they were doing.
They're up there.
It's for Obama.
And I, you know, maybe they're surveying the Statue of Liberty from Air Force One, replacing that statue with one of Obama in 2013.
Who knows?
I don't know, folks.
I'm just telling you, none of it computes.
None of the official explanations compute.
So we've got the bondholders at General Motors who put up 27 billion, are going to get 10% of the country company.
Don Obama and his uh soldiers, the United Auto workers, uh put up 10 million dollars of bonds.
We're going to get 39% of the company.
Okay.
Okay.
Good.
And well, it's I'm sure it was an offer they can't refuse.
I mean it was an offer nobody could refuse.
But I predicted this.
Here, grab sound by number two.
Grab it again.
I predicted this back on December 22nd.
Let me know when you got sound by number two ready to go.
Sound by number two.
Here it is.
Don't worry.
The automobile industry is not gonna go kaput because the United Auto Workers will not be allowed to go kaput.
Well, God knows that's.
What's gonna happen is the UAW is gonna end up owning it.
What after the government invests and nationalizes the auto industry, the Obama administration, out of a sense of compassion, will transfer ownership free of charges, transfer the deed to the United Auto Workers.
Yeah.
The caller was laughing when I said it.
Everybody was laughing when I said it.
Now here it is reality.
Admit it, you laughed when I said it.
Oh, come on, Rush, there you go.
You're going off the deep end again.
I predicted December 22nd.
Didn't happen exactly like that, but the bottom line is when I heard Obama say, well, I didn't hear him say it, but I know I mean you can read what he says between the lines, translate what he says.
He's gonna return the nation's wealth to its quote unquote rightful owners.
And Obama's worldview, union workers have been screwed left and right uh by CEO, by management, by everybody else, and it's about time you know the auto companies would not have been auto companies without the auto workers to put them on the boards of directors.
Look at this.
Washington Post, GM to uh to forge ahead without key brands, automaker to shed, pottiac, Hummer, Saturn, and the Saab lines.
SAAB.
For those of you in uh Rio Linda might think they were crying, it's this is the name of a car.
Uh yesterday, General Motors traded imagination for reality, saying it'll dump Pontiac along with Hummer, Saturn, and Saab, and placed its future in the hands of Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick, and GMC.
It's a pretty sad day, said Jack Neerad, executive editorial director at the Kelly Blue Book, a leading provider of information on new and used vehicles.
His first Pontiac was a 1968 Firebird, one of the most beloved.
My first car was a Pontiac.
I wanted to get a GTO, 1969, but I couldn't afford it.
I had to get a Lamont's Lamar, same body, a little bit different grill, not as snazzy in interior, and certainly not as big an engine.
GTO was awesome.
Beach Boy sang about it.
Little GTU.
They have a Beach Boy sing about all kinds of cars, car crashes, death, flames, crashes of it.
So I had a Laman's.
I did have the money to order a walnut shift knob.
It was a four-speed.
That was the um the one liberty I took with it.
No, that the the car that I was told needed a new disgruntrificator was a Pontiac Bonneville.
My first car was a Pontiac.
My second car was the Buick third car was a Pontiac.
Now there aren't any Pontiacs anymore.
How does this read?
Yesterday, GM traded imagination for reality and paired itself back.
You know, wouldn't it be great if our government demanded the same of itself trading imagination for reality.
Pair back what isn't working.
This is I mean, we're laughing at it because I just I'm just seeing a bunch of Tony Sopranos as car salesmen now.
And I'm I'm seeing I'm seeing every car come off the assembly line with a with a a welded in Obampa bumper sticker, maybe even an Obama hood ornament.
Um just I'm I'm laughing here at union leaders deciding what union workers are going to make, what the wages are gonna.
I can't wait to see that contract negotiation.
I can't wait to see the United Auto Workers negotiate with the United Auto Workers.
And I can't wait for the UAW to threaten to go on strike, telling the UAW if it doesn't meet his demands, that the UAW is gonna go on strike.
I just I can't wait to see this.
Yeah, Hood Ornament Obama Interiors by Michelle, Power Train designed by Steve Ratner.
These cars are going to be designed by the Sierra Club folks.
Uh and Greenpeace.
You know, if you want a General Motors car, while it's still General Motors, right now's the time to do it.
Honest to goodness.
So what they're holding on to Cadillac, they're holding on to Chevrolet, Buick, and GMC.
And they're they gotta they gotta, I happen to know this.
General Motors has got a new sales plan for uh Cadillac and for Chevron.
I mean still the Hummer, too.
They've they've got a they've got to get rid of the uh inventory.
So they're they're backing for five years the uh Power Train at five years, hundred thousand miles, whichever comes first.
Uh a full year of OnStar is uh standard on every Cadillac model.
And onStar is amazing.
In fact, it's got a nav system that beats most other navigation systems if where you want to go, like if you're headed to Port St. Lucy, and where you want to go in Port St. Lucie is not in the navigation system.
All you have to do is call the Onstar operator, and they'll give you a turn-by-turn directions.
Because they know.
And the number if you're in an emergency, if you need a car unlocked, if you go into McDonald's, and you get all upset in there because they're out of McNuggets, and you didn't shut the car off.
The keys are in it, you go back out, you're still mad because you got no McNuggets.
Oh my god, how do I get in a car?
Just call OnStar, and they'll unlock the car for you.
Well, they may not get direct you to where they do have McNuggets, uh, if the McDonald's you're at doesn't have them, but you know, OnStar can do a lot.
And also, this if you lose your job, they'll make the car payment up to 500 bucks a month up to nine months.
And it's such a shame because they're making Cadillac is a um we've driven a lot of them.
What's the crossover?
What's the the XRX or something?
Just a just a great car.
So uh General Motors still moving automobiles out there, doing what they can, and they are making deals, and if you want a General Motors car now might be the time to uh look into it.
I have a press release from the Centers for Disease Control.
Now the press release is January 7, 2003.
Now, admittedly, this is six years ago.
But it's the most recent I could find.
Using new and improved statistical models, the Center for Disease Control's estimate, or estimate that an average of 36,000 people die from flu-related uh complications every year in the U.S. In addition,
about 11,000 people die per year from respiratory virus, RSV a virus that causes upper and lower respiratory tract infections, primarily in uh young children, uh crumb crunchers and older adults.
So in a normal year, I the reason I looked this up because I was asking about this yesterday.
In a normal year, 36,000 people die in this country of the flu.
Now this pig flu apparently doesn't just hit the elderly.
It's uh in Mexico's targeting people between 20 and 40.
Uh those are the ones who've been hit.
But we're not we're not looking anywhere near numbers of 36,000 a year yet, and yet we're dead.
It's over.
And it's so bad.
Closing the borders wouldn't make any sense.
There's nothing we can do.
Now, something's going on in Mexico because they've closed the schools and they've closed all the restaurants.
Now something's going on down there with this.
And people have been asking me, well, hey, Rush, how come how come it's so bad in Mexico and not not as bad here?
Um thing, folks, Mexico has socialized medicine.
We don't yet.
But here's some interesting numbers.
Two weeks after the first known swine flu death.
Mexico still hasn't given any medication to the families of the dead.
Mexico has not determined where the outbreak began or how it spread.
And in fact, some uh Mexican government official is saying it started here in the United States.
Just out.
And Judge Jampin, let's see.
Uh what's his name?
Mexican Health Secretary Jose Angel Cordoba says it's risky to blame Mexico for this outbreak because it probably started in the United States.
Right.
Started here, but Mexico's experiencing a majority of the uh of the illnesses and deaths.
Despite an annual budget of more than five billion dollars, Mexico's health secretary said yesterday his agency hasn't had the resources to visit the families of the dead.
Now the families of the dead are the ones going to be most most prone to being infected and spread it.
And Mexico hadn't even given them any medication whatsoever.
Uh alias Camacho, 31-year-old truck driver with fever, cough, and body aches, was ordered out of a government ambulance Sunday because paramedics complained they might get the disease.
You wonder why it's worse in Mexico.
They're treating people who have it like lepers.
Uh Jose Isaac Cepeda said that two hospitals refused to treat his fever, his diarrhea, and his joint pains.
The first turned him away because he wasn't registered in the public health system.
The second, he said didn't let him in because they said they're too busy.
So I mean, one of the explanations for why it's bad in Mexico and not as bad here or elsewhere is a difference in the health care systems of the two countries.
We'll be right back.
Don't go away.
Hi, great to have you back, Rush Limbaugh with talent on lawn from God.
Behind the Golden EIB.
Microphone.
Here is uh John in Marshalltown, Iowa.
Nice to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
What a thrill to talk to you.
Thanks for taking my call.
You bet, sir, any time.
I uh Snerdley tells me that I missed your thoughts about uh Arlen Specter in the first hour, and I beg your forgiveness for that, but uh that's what I was calling about to find out uh what you thought about that.
Uh very very briefly I'll go through uh the reasons for the switch.
Number one, there's polling data shows him losing to his primary challenger, Pat Toomey.
Number one job of a politician is to get re-elected.
He doesn't think he can get re-elected.
He's not going to say that.
What he's saying is the Republican Party's gone too far right uh since the Reagan Big Ten 80s.
It's not true.
The the party has has veered away from the right.
Uh just six weeks ago, Arlen Spector said to the Hill newspaper in Washington that he would never leave the Republican Party, that we need a two balance two party system, need checks and balances.
We're too close to a one-party system, uh, and we need Republicans in the Northeast.
Six weeks later, he leaves the party.
This is all about the fact he did is not going to have an easy time winning re-election or even the primary uh in 2010, and he wants to win, uh wants to win re-election.
It's it's it's uh no great loss for the conservative movement, really not for the Republican Party.
Uh he was he was pretty much liberal.
He wasn't a moderate Republican, he was a liberal Republican most of the time, and and uh I think probably the the last straw with him is something that that he was really hoping for, and it didn't happen.
You know, he was the Senator that killed Card Check in the Senate because he came out against it, this ability to be able to organize union shops with uh with open ballots anywhere the union wants to try it.
And I thought he really wanted accolades for that and big uh cheers and celebration.
He didn't get that because you don't get a medal for doing the right thing.
So he put it all together and he figured out he wasn't gonna win, gonna have a tough time winning the Republican primary.
His speech today is making his comments right now, but his statement uh laid it all out.
The Republicans are just too freaky right wingish.
Uh he hasn't been on the same page with them in a long, long time, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Very good.
Don't you think that it'd be good if he just take the rest of the rhinos with him as well?
Well, didn't McCain with him, Dick McCain's daughter with him, uh, Megan uh and some others.
This is ultimately good.
I mean, this is this is this is winnowing out the people that uh that that end up misdefining or or in uh preventing the uh party from having a you know singular identity.
I never hear about the Democrat Party big tent.
It's only the Republicans that need to welcome people in who are not Republicans.
It's only the Republicans who have to go out and win elections by being moderate or by attracting Democrat voters by offering Democrat philosophy.
It's only the Republicans have to do that.
We never hear about the Democrat Party and its need to be a big tent.
You know, and let some religious people in there and uh let some pro-life people in there.
Never hear about that.
This is smokescreen.
Also, you need to know.
Uh, as you watch Media Today, John, that the media template is.
Well, how can a Republican Party claim it's a national party?
I mean, they can't even have a moderate Republican like Arlen Specter want to stay in the party.
How can the party be a national party?
But he's not a moderate Republican.
He's uh he's a liberal.
Period.
Republican sometimes, but he was uh liberal.
Bruce in Fort Wayne, Indiana, you're next on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
A pleasure.
Um what is Spector's legacy?
Uh what is the postmortem of Spectre as a Republican?
Because I I'm I'm not sure if you're not aware of the.
Why what do we need uh legacy for a senator?
Okay, what's Ted Kennedy's legacy?
Exactly.
Um bigger government, uh boozing over a bridge, uh being an incompetent and and all the all the fat and pork that went with it.
Well, that's your legacy, but it's like it's like these uh first hundred days.
Depending on who you ask, best president ever.
Or an utter disaster.
All depends on your perspective.
I don't caught up in Spectre's legacy as a as a Republican.
I mean, the things I remember uh good about Spectre, he really, really uh tore into the people who were trying to destroy Clarence Thomas.
He really tore into the Anita Hill crowd.
He was made to feel uncomfortable about it after it happened, but he was he was huge helping get Clarence Thomas voted onto the U.S. Supreme Court, getting the uh approval out of the out of the Senate, and this and other things like that, but uh I don't I don't this whole legacy business is something I don't think about because I always look forward, not back.
We'll be back in a minute.
I mentioned earlier in the program that the Gallup poll has a far different take on President Obama's popularity than the other polls, particularly the one out today, CBS New York Times.
According to Gallup's April survey, Americans have a lower approval of Mr. Obama at this point than all but one president since Gallup began tracking this in 1969.
The only new president less popular was Bill Clinton, who got off to a bad start, uh, tried to force uh the don't ask, don't tell uh policy on the military.
Plus, there was the Janet Waco raid in Reno that killed 86 people at the branch dividian complex.
Obama's current approval rating of 56% is only one point higher than the 55% approval that Clinton had during those crises.
And they have a chart here, and as it shows, five presidents rated higher than Obama after 100 days in office.
Ronaldo's Magnus topped the charts in April of 81 with 67% approval.
After Reagan, in order of popularity were Jimmy Carter at 63% in 77, George W. Bush, 62%, 2001, Nixon, 61% in 69, and George H. W. Bush with 58% in 1989.
Uh, as they say here in the Washington Times, it's no surprise that the drive-by's are not anxious to point out that their darling is less popular than George W. Bush.
But given the Gallup numbers, their hurrahs could be more subdued.
USA Today's front page touted the April poll results as positive, with a headline Public Thinks Highly of Obama.
The current cover of Newsweek ponders the secret of Obama's success.
A comparison with previous presidents is useful because they're usually popular during their first few months in office, and most presidents have been more popular than Obama.
Now, this is Gallup, and Gallup is a respected polling outfit, but they're being totally ignored because all these other outfits have their own polling units, too, so poll units do not quote other poll units.
And when I, you know, I read this uh story and and it just illustrates the gap in what is news, what's fact, what you can believe in, what's real.
There's a huge gap.
I mean, we we have total perception and PR.
We have total propaganda from the White House through the drive-by media, presenting a picture of Obama.
These first hundred days have been a disaster.
The political solutions that have been offered to fix the banks, the financial system, and the automobile industry.
I defy anybody to tell me they've worked for America.
They're working great for Obama, who wants to nationalize everything and put his buddies in charge of all these institutions.
But you tell me how it makes any sense for the public sector to take over private sector companies, populate them with people who have no idea how to run or make or market or sell a car that people want to drive.
How does this make any sense?
Well, if you if you look at a car company as having that purpose, then it won't make any sense.
But if you look at a car company as an opportunity to cement political control and power, if you look at an industry as that, then this is a great move for Obama.
You know, the the uh we talk about Askheritage.org on this program, Askheritage.org.
I can't believe the unique things that are there that are factual that I don't find anywhere else.
I mean, Askheritage.org.
It's just 25 bucks to be a member.
I'm a member, you can pay more than that, it's they're they're a think tank.
But um dig into the details that they provide to all members of their organization.
You are just amazed.
The only website that rivals theirs is mine.
In terms of archival data, our essential stack of stuff and all the things, the archival data past programs on this program.
Uh they've got they've got their own observation, for example, on the first hundred days.
And I guarantee you, it's is not it's it's a treatment you won't find anywhere else.
Um they are holding Obama accountable, campaign promises.
So he's gonna roll back earmarks.
Uh he said he was going to uh cut spending, is gonna go through the budget line by line and eliminate all these wasteful things.
And yesterday we had a story that 20 billion dollars for food stamps is out there, and they know that 400 million of it is gonna be stolen, but they're leaving it in.
They're just gonna budget 400 million dollars of it is fraud, while Obama's out saying he's gonna eliminate this kind of thing.
He's doing no such thing.
Ask Heritage.org is really good.
Ask him a question.
If you have something you need to know, just go there and ask him a question.
Put it in.
It's an amazing thing.
Back to the phones.
Edwin Atlanta, your next.
Great to have you on the EIB network, sir.
Hi.
Hey, hey, Russia, good afternoon.
Hey, I just what hit me, uh watching the news reels for the flight over New York yesterday with the uh backup.
I want to call it backup Air Force One.
I realize the the the true definition of Air Force One.
But it just the current administration, it seems like they'll do anything that they want because of they are the administration versus the previous inter administration, which to me over eight years, they they always came across as public servants.
And so it's almost like we are from the higher, so we're gonna do whatever we want to do.
And the idea that uh the executive branch has no clue of what's going on with their backup jet, from my limited experience, is very far from the truth.
I mean, they knew exactly what was going on.
It's just outrageous they would put those people in uh in a situation like that in New York.
So that's all I wanted to say.
Well, there's any number of ways to explain that.
Uh arrogance.
They don't care.
Uh they didn't think it'd be a problem.
They had uh security concerns that were greater that outweighed uh letting the people of New York know what was uh what was gonna happen.
But you're right.
I've been saying this the whole program.
They're dumping on the guy Caldera that runs the White House military office.
White House military office.
The White House Military Office is very high member of the White House staff.
And Obama's out there saying, Well, we found out about it, same name unit.
We didn't know what our staff was doing.
We didn't know.
It's just unbelievable.
But this, folks get used to it, because this is a minor incident.
You wait till all these stimulus plans wreck things, start falling apart.
Obama didn't know this would happen.
Obama didn't know that people would do that.
Obama didn't know.
That's what we're gonna be up against for quite a while.
Patrick and Joplin, Missouri, great to have you here on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Afternoon, Professor.
How are you?
Fine, third.
Uh sir, thank you.
Just wanted to share with you that I spent some time in the Air Force and then shot some of those uh different type of unit type photos where the planes will fly over some monumental area that the unit wants to show respect, the crew signs the poster, Thunderbirds do it, little angels do it, all the VC aircraft do it, which is what the Air Force wants called the VC aircraft.
Uh they could be shooting a new skyline of New York for a giveaway type thing, uh, you know, without the twin towers back there.
I mean, they hadn't done that yet.
Well, time frame.
What what to whom would they give away pictures of Air Force One flying over uh uh you mean the the kind of pictures that'd be aboard the airplane the president would sign for guests on the airplane?
Not not so much the president as it would be the the detachment coming in, like when the Blue Angels come in, the Thunderbirds come in, or even Air Force One, you basically just hand the keys of the base over to them because they have their staff, their security, the whole you know, nine yards that take care of things, and they will usually leave that with the tower or the base commander, or you know, the people who helped them the most, saying, yes they caught the top, it'll say many thanks for the visit of detachment one, unit 42, whatever it is, uh all the crew signs uh the bottom part of it.
So it's more for the Air Force crew than it is for the president to use in most cases.
Okay, well, I'm still having trouble understanding.
So keep uh these guys on Air Force One all sign the pictures of the airplane near the Statue of Liberty, who do they give it to?
The the visiting the hosting base.
In other words, did they come into uh one of the Air Force bases in Texas?
Okay, so if they if they if they if they tech take the president to the U to the U.S. Air Force Base uh, you know, someplace in in Nebraska, they get off the plane and handle people at that base the picture of Air Force One at the Statue of Liberty autographed and signed by the members of the Air Force One crew.
Yeah, Statue of Liberty, Mount Rushmore, the Golden Gate Bridge, you get a lot of them that they use their monumental, and even overseas, too, people who aren't used to handling back up aircraft, uh just a thank you from the air crew saying thank you for putting up for us and putting up for us.
All right, fine and then I want to know.
When was the last time this was done?
We know this hasn't been done since September 11th, 2001.
Not in New York, it hasn't.
It'd be interesting to find out when the last time Air Force One was taken up for publicity photo ops and where it happened.
But we know that this has not happened in New York.
And we we also we have to assume out there, Patrick, that they already have a bunch of stock photos of this 747, these two, one of them, flying by the Statue of Liberty.
So why new ones?
There's something about this that that uh it's probably a simple explanation, but these denials and these acts of shock and surprise, you know, raise red flags.
Well, we're just doing a photo up.
Well, no, we couldn't tell anybody.
We want to give terrorists on the ground an opportunity to target Air Force One.
So, yeah, necessary collateral.
We had to have people running for their lives in buildings and streets in New York.
Yeah, but we're sorry, it won't happen again.
The one thing, if they were taking this thing up, if if this was nothing more than the Obama admin, well, the Democrat National Committee, which is Obama now, if they were up there collecting footage for a future campaign, television commercials in a future campaign, we will never see it now.
Because they will not.
Well, maybe in four years, even the people that care won't be able to do anything about it.
But I just I don't if that's if that was the reason, we'll never see it now.
They that they will not compound the problem because that then would let us know that that was for Obama.
Even the Obama's out there saying he had no idea, which is also not possible.
I think this one thing, this Obama guy's a stand-up guy, isn't he?
He really stands behind people who's in the threw the threw this guy, Caldera, on the sword.
They're throwing whoever at the FAA overboard.
I mean, really stands up for his people, doesn't he?
Really a stand-up guy.
Back in uh just a second.
Stay with us.
This is hilarious.
Americans United for Change, which is a union thug group, has just put on a press release.
And here's the headline of the press release from Americans, the United for Change.
Spectre decision, the ultimate rejection of the limbaugh-led party of no.
Specter decision, the ultimate rejection of limbaugh-led party of no.
I love it.
We have a couple Spectre sound bites.
Here he admits he wasn't gonna let a Republican primary electorate determine his political future.
In the course of the last several months since the stimulus vote, I have traveled the state, surveyed the sentiments of the Republican Party in Pennsylvania, done public opinion polls, observed other public opinion polls, and have found that the prospects for winning a Republican primary are bleak.
I am not prepared to have my 29-year record in the United States Senate decided by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate.
Not prepared to have that record decided by that jury.
Oh, folks, I mean this this.
He has just firebombed the Republican primary elected in electorate in Pennsylvania.
He's not gonna have his magnificent 29-year record judged and decided by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate.
He said this in another portion of his remarks.
I know that some of the news stories since my statement was released this morning are taking a look at the 60th vote.
And uh I will not be an automatic 60th vote.
And I would illustrate that by uh my position on employees' choice, also known as Card Check.
Uh I think it is a bad deal, and I'm opposed to it, and would not vote to uh uh invoke cloture.
All right, now let's remember this because today we have the statement uh from Americans United for Change, a bunch of union people, Spectre decision, the ultimate rejection of Limbaugh-led party of no.
Yet Spectre's just told Americans United for Change on your card check.
Card checks their big deal.
However, however, President Obama has announced, isn't it amazing how quickly these things happen?
President Obama has announced he's gonna campaign for Spectre.
And it was only six weeks ago that Senator Specter said he would never leave the Republican Party.
So April 28, 2009, Senator Spectre says, I'm not an automatic 60th vote.
No way.
Uh against card check.
Don't like it.
Doesn't mean uh we'll have to wait and see after the campaigning that President Obama does for Senator Spectre and so forth, but we do know that six weeks ago he said never ever changing parties.
Today he says, I'm not gonna vote, not change my mind on card check.
Change your mind once, it's easier to do it again and again and again.
You know what?
Keep an eye on something, folks.
All of the moderate Republicans in the Senate now, they're starting to cry about this.
About Spectre.
They're starting to um uh actually screaming.
This means they are worried about their own fate.
Republican Party apparently made no effort to keep Spectre.
And we keep hearing moderates are on the rise.
Ha!
Ha!
Doesn't work that way, folks.
All right.
See you tomorrow.
Look forward to it.
▲
Export Selection