Well, this is just too rich, and it just all makes sense.
Frankly, I don't blame the Norcs.
I don't blame the Norc.
How can you not blame the Norcs?
Nobody's doing anything to make them stop, so what the hell?
Folks, the latest news out of North Korea is that Kim Jong-il Well, I'm sorry, communist dictator, he may not know about this.
Kim Jong-il may be totally unaware of this, but other elements of the North Korean government have ordered the UN's International Atomic Agency, the thing that that idiot, Muhammad AlBaradai, heads up.
They just ordered him out of country.
We don't know yet whether Kim Jong-il is aware that this is happening under his name.
Most dictators, obviously, things happen in their countries they don't know about.
But the North Koreans have told the International Atomic Agency, whatever, Atomic Energy Agency, get the hell out of country, just like Saddam Hussein did.
Just get out of here.
Screw you, buds of the UA.
Get out of here.
It's because the UN issued one of the most limp-writted reactions to the NORCs missile launch last week.
And we strongly disapprove it.
That made the NORCs mad.
So the Norx said, screw you, get out of here.
The White House, and in the meantime, the White House is out there urging the Norcs to not do any of this.
Can you blame the Norcs with that kind of response?
Look at the Norcs.
Two times, the Clinton administration, at least once, maybe twice, secured nuclear weapons material through a deal made with America to send them nuclear energy ingredients and converted it.
And now the Norx are announcing that they're going to start converting all this to nuclear weapons, just like Iran.
So the UN's got their IAEA over there, and the Norx just scrambled, get out of here.
We don't want anything to do with you.
You can't blame them.
They've been allowed to get away with everything else.
Who's stopping them?
And they know that their buds in arms are the CHICOMs.
And we cannot anger the ChICOMs because the ChICOMs hold our debt.
Greetings and welcome back.
It's Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Great to have you with us today, folks.
Telephone number 800-282-2882, the email address, lrushbo at EIBnet.com.
Mr. Snerdley, the official program observer and screener of calls, is asking me if this constitutes a test of our young, courageous, brave president coming off a brilliant high seas maneuver of wiping out three teenagers on board a life raft.
The Vice President Joe Biden said before they were immaculately inaugurated that they're going to be tested in the first six months and that the people aren't going to disagree with their response to it.
Obviously, the three black teenagers, the Muslims gunned down on Sunday at the orders of President Obama.
That wasn't a test.
What were the stakes there?
Plus, four more ships are hijacked today anyway, except a Chikom ship.
A Chikom ship was not hijacked because somehow a giant school of dolphins surfaced right there in the pathway between a pirate ship on their way to hijack the Chikom ship.
I don't think this, I don't know that this is the test.
You know, getting the Norcs launching their missile and kicking the IAEA out.
But it could be.
We'll just have to wait and see.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program again, 800-282-2882.
The email address is lrushbo at eibnet.com.
Reuters has a, as a story today, as a deep recession strips Americans of their jobs, their homes, and investments.
The 2009 U.S. tax season promises to see a large uptick in first-time delinquent income taxpayers.
Richard Boggs, founder and chief executive of the LA-based Nationwide Tax Relief, which is a firm that helps delinquent taxpayers resolve their issues, said that the calls they're receiving are up 280%.
Yeah, we've seen a huge rise in what we call a rookie delinquent taxpayer.
They are scared.
They have no idea what's going to happen to them because, God bless them, they've never owed before.
Now, you people need, you people, if you are a rookie delinquent taxpayer, don't sweat it because I saw on the Drudge report earlier today that the IRS Maybe I can see it up here.
IRS was IRS, well, it's gone.
Maybe the IRS changed their mind.
Hang on here.
Let's see if I can scroll down and find this.
Stick with me on this, folks.
I don't want to report misinformation here to you.
Ah, this is not good.
And I had heard earlier that the IRS was going to be very understanding about this and very lenient and sympathetic to tax collections this year.
But a story has vanished.
Let's see.
Let me give it one more.
Surgeon National.
Ah, Washington vows sympathy.
It's still up there.
The reason I missed it, it's because it's under a smiling picture of President Obama.
But it's, yep, Washington, Washington vows sympathy.
So if you are a rookie delinquent taxpayer, I will not be delinquent, sadly.
Well, not sadly, but I can't tell you how ticked I am.
I'm not going to get into detail.
I cannot tell you.
Nobody would have any sympathy anyway, and I wouldn't be looking for any from anywhere, but this is just out of hand.
All right.
We'll see how many people believe the story that Washington's going to be sympathetic.
Let's see.
Oh, yeah.
Typical story.
A.P. Obama, they're great with gasoline, but micro-car crash test results show that the microcars don't fare too well in collisions with larger vehicles.
The crash tests were conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
The test found that drivers of the 2009 versions of the Smart 4-2, the Honda Fit, and a Toyota Yarris.
Have you seen any of these things tooling around?
I have a friend that's got one of these smart cars.
The test found that drivers could face significant leg and head injuries in severe front-end crashes with mid-sized vehicles.
Not even SUV.
SUV could probably wipe you out.
In the two collisions, the Institute said the smart car, which weighs about 1,800 pounds, went airborne and turned around 450 degrees after striking the C-Class, which weighs nearly twice as much.
And the C-Class is not that big a car.
Automakers who manufacture the small car say the test simulated a high-speed crash that rarely happens on the road.
Rarely.
They also said the test rehashed past insurance industry arguments against tougher fuel efficiency standards.
In a related story, gasoline is expected to remain cheap this summer.
Despite the dismal economy, motorists may want to take to the road this summer.
The federal government says gasoline prices are expected to stay relatively low, but they're never right.
However, gasoline prices, even when they do spike in the springtime, they always do come down a little bit from where they were for the summertime.
Let's see.
I have a quick commercial timeout here, folks.
We'll do that.
We'll come back lots more straight ahead.
Plus, let me see if I printed it out.
Didn't print it out.
We haven't seen one of these stories in a long time.
Our favorite local rag here, the Palm Beach Post, has got one of these stories we used to see all over the place two years ago: runaway SUV wiping out innocent people with no mention of the driver.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
I'm just sitting here reading an AP story out of Nairobi, which is in Kenya.
I swear, reading this story, you would think that the Somali merchant marine organizers actually have a spokesman.
I don't know where AP gets this information about them.
Let me give you an example.
U.S. and French naval attacks on Somali pirates raised fears Monday for the safety of scores of foreign sailors, still held hostage, has sparked a debate on safeguarding shipping.
The most likely outcome, though, is business as usual for the merchant marine organizers.
Pirate leaders in Somalia have vowed to retaliate for the killing of three young teenage pirates by the Obama administration sharpshooters in the daring rescue of American Captain Richard.
No, it doesn't really say that.
I'm just, I put it in there myself.
The International Maritime Bureau said that it supported the U.S. and French action, but also cautioned it may spark retaliation by pirates, which it has.
I mean, if four more ships were hijacked today, Vilma de Guzman, the wife of Filipino seafarer Ruel de Guzman, who's been held since November 10th, said those released are lucky, but what about those who remain captive?
Now, without any quote, without any attribution to anybody in the pirate community, comes this next sentence.
The pirates' primary concerns, however, are economic, and they have no interest in escalating violence.
Who wrote this piece?
Tom Malidi of the Associated Press.
The Associated Press is the spokesman for the pirate community because this is a PR job for the pirates.
But there's no, how does this guy know the pirates' primary concerns are economic?
They have no interest in escalating violence.
No, they just hijacked four more ships today.
Pirates armed with assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades typically speed toward a ship in skiffs.
They use ropes and hooks to get aboard without shooting.
Within days, a ransom of a million to two million dollars is delivered by sea or air, and the ship and crew are released.
No big deal.
No shot is fired.
No one's harmed.
Hostages have even told to being fed sumptuously with pirates billing the shipping companies for the food.
The pirates are billing the shipping company.
There's got to be a return address if you're billing the if you are the pirates and you're billing the shipping companies for the food, the shipping companies have to have some address to send the money back if they're stupid enough to do it.
It's absurd!
It is an AP story that's a puff piece PR piece press release for the pirates.
Gets even better.
That and the ransom are paid by insurance companies.
The food's paid for by the shipping fleet.
The ransom's paid by insurance companies.
Big deal.
Nobody's hurt here.
There's no harm.
Last year, premiums for passage all along the East African coast shot up.
Premiums?
Premiums for passage?
It's like the fee you pay to go through the Panama Canal.
Yes.
Premiums for passage paid by insurance companies.
And the passage along the East Africa coast shot up in August, September when there was an increase in hijackings and then fell in January when bad weather saw little pirate activity.
President Obama vowed on Monday to resolve to halt the rise of piracy.
That could herald a new chapter in the piracy saga, said Crispian Cuss of London's risk mitigation olive group.
The pirates had a really good year last year.
They took a lot of ships.
They made a lot of money.
Almost all hijackings are resolved peacefully.
They had a great year.
That's right.
They have a great business model.
This is being written about as though it's a tourist attraction.
For those of you with giant yachts, go out there and watch all this.
Watch the hijackings.
Watch the brilliant business model in action.
Watch the captain and the crew be taken hostage.
Watch the ransom airdropped.
Watch the crew released.
Imagine, because you won't see it, the crew eating sumptuous meals paid for by the shipping companies who are billed for this by the pirate community.
I think the cruise lines ought to start selling crews over to here, this area, the Gulf of Aiden, just to watch this.
Join us on a five-day hostage cruise.
Get fed sumptuous food.
Enjoy high seas adventure.
We too might be hijacked, but don't worry.
The cruise line will feed us well because the pirates will bill them for it.
And the pirates will get a ransom and they will watch this brilliant business model unfold.
Noel Chung of the Piracy Watchdog International Maritime.
Oh, did you know there was a piracy watchdog?
I didn't until just now.
The Piracy Watchdog International Maritime, another bureaucracy that does nothing but watch.
And here's the quote from Noel Chung of the Piracy Watchdog International Maritime Bureau.
It says, we do not approve or support the crews of vessels be armed.
Once you start arming the crew, then the pirates will start shooting the crew, even an unarmed crew.
No, no, if the crew is armed and they can't be unarmed at the same time.
Oh, well, let me start again.
Once you start arming the crew, said Noel Chung, then the pirates will start shooting the crew, even an unarmed crew.
Once that is done, you will have more problems because the crew will start shooting at other non-pirate ships.
So the International Maritime Bureau theorizes that if you arm the crew of the peaceful cargo ships trying to deliver their mercy mission food to starving Africans and others, if you arm the crew, they will start shooting other ships.
Meanwhile, the pirates, all they want to do is hijack you, take you there, feed you well, build a shipping company for it, get their ransom, and let you go.
For you animal rights activists and lovers out there, I want you to try this on for size.
This is a story from Seattle.
Spokane, sorry.
Spokane, Washington, having a problem with too many ground squirrels at the Finch, I don't know, Arbore Eatum.
I've never seen this word.
A-R-B-O-R-E-T-U-M.
Aboretum?
Aboretum?
What the hell is an Aboretum?
Is this the name for a park?
Is that what it is?
The Finch Arboretum.
Okay.
So the Parks and Recreation Department's going to use a special machine to blow up some of the 100 to 150 rodents that are tearing up the grounds of the French Arboretum.
The machine is called the Rodinator Pro.
It pumps propane and oxygen into the tunnels of the squirrels and then sends an electric spark that causes an explosion.
The shockwaves kill the squirrels and collapse their tunnels.
The Parks Department says that the Rodenator 150, the Rodinator Pro, the Rodinator Pro is a humane way to kill the squirrels, but it warns area residents the explosions do sound like shotguns.
Do not be alarmed by them, as they're going to be happening all week.
San Jose, California.
Susan, welcome to the Rush Limbaugh program.
Nice to have you with us.
Oh, thank you.
I called because you were reading the report from the Homeland Security, and I wanted to say I think I completely agree with it.
Okay, I'll bite.
Tell me why.
Well, because, you know, we're the people that want to go back to the Constitution, that, you know, really love our freedom and understand that it's being taken away, and therefore we pose an enormous threat to the government.
We're the people buying guns and storing ammunition and preparing for the time when we have to fight the government off.
Wait a minute, though.
I understand the point you're trying to make, but that's not extremism.
Well, to them it is.
But it's not.
They don't get to define the terms.
We are not extremists.
Those of us who want to protect the founding of this nation and preserve it as it was when we were born and grew up, we are not extremists.
They are the extremists.
They're not right about this.
This is an effort to criminalize political dissent, standard, ordinary, everyday political dissent.
This is an effort to criminalize it and to categorize it as something people need to be afraid of and perhaps defend themselves against, which is a crock.
We'll be back.
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limbaugh and the EIB Network.
Great to have you here, folks.
Let's see.
This is Rob in North Dakota.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
How are you doing, man?
It's an honor to talk to you.
Thank you very much.
I'm talking, I'm giving you a call on this thing, this right-wing extremism thing that we've apparently come up with.
And we got a document a while back.
I worked for the government as well, and something of that nature that came out.
And apparently, it's public knowledge now.
But I couldn't believe what I was reading.
I've been in the agency for almost 20 years.
Wait now.
Ho ho.
Which agency?
Customs and Border Protection.
Customs and Border Protection.
Are you referring to this Department of Home Security thing about right-wing extremism?
Yes, sir.
So how long ago did you get it?
A couple days ago.
Yeah, okay.
Yeah.
A couple days ago.
And it's okay.
Now that I know what you're talking about, your reaction to it.
You couldn't believe what you were reading.
I couldn't believe what I was reading because the things that we stand for as God-fearing Americans and the things that are in our Constitution.
And I'm reading this document, and I about fell out of my chair because apparently if you believe in some of these things, you're this right-wing extremist crazy person.
And there was mention to white supremacy and things like that in there, and I thought it was.
There's all kinds of things like the shooter.
There's one insight cited.
The shooter in Pittsburgh that shot three cops.
This report cites him as being a loony tune that believed that the Jews were trying to control the world with a one-world government and that he was opposing the cops because he was one of these wacko beliefs.
And to that, to Janet Napolitano and Obama, a shooter like that, that's what they think a mainstream conservative is.
Right, and that's what just throws me for a loop because it's like if you are a conservative person, you know, we're back to this right-wing conspiracy thing from the Clinton era, and they're using that terminology.
And when I read that, that was the first thing that caught my eye was that title up on the page.
I said, what is this?
And then it had an official seal and all these things on it.
I couldn't believe what I was reading.
So I don't know what to think of it.
You don't know what to think of it?
Well, I do, but it's just very shocking because I can't believe we've gone this far over the bubble that, I mean, it's like, how do we regain our ability to bring it back a little bit?
To me, it's not so far how we've gone.
I know you mean America, but I think it's a very instructive and teachable moment.
I mean, this are all these poor people that think Obama's about unity and solving all of our problems and bringing us all together.
This guy's like every other politician.
He's about wiping out his political enemies.
And unfortunately, he considers conservatives in the United States to be a bigger threat to his country and him than people that want to blow up our country.
I think it's helpful in the sense that people can get an idea of just who this man is because it's not Janet Napolitano.
Janet Napolitano wouldn't put something like this out unless it, because this is so extreme itself that this wouldn't go out unless it had Obama's imprimatur.
And it's what we're up against.
It is finally words on paper what the extreme left in this country actually thinks of us.
And for that reason, it's somewhat helpful.
But the danger in it is, is that it creates a circumstance where law enforcement officials can now treat people who are engaged in a time-honored art of just standard political dissent, of being right-wing extremists, prone to military acts, militia acts, violence, so forth, spied on, monitored, and this sort of thing.
No accident.
This comes out a week before the tea parties that are slated to kick off tomorrow.
Speaking of that, here's Judy in, I guess it's somewhere in Delaware.
Hi, how are you, Judy?
I'm at Rehobus Beach, Delaware, and I'm going to a tea party tomorrow in Georgetown, Delaware.
Rush, I'll get to my point.
I'm very concerned with somebody trying to attach himself to these tea parties.
If we're not careful, we're going to end up with our own green candidate for president the next time.
As you know, Newt very early on bought into man-made global warming, and he bounced on the couch with Nancy.
And I'm concerned that if we're not careful, he's going to become a spokesman for the Republican Party.
He's coming to the city.
Wait a minute.
Are you talking about Newt Gingrich?
I am talking about none other than Newt Gingrich.
And he is positioning himself to run for president the next time.
But he's not the only one.
I mean, there's only one.
I know he's not, but he is an elitist, big spending, global warming, and he is doing a lot of things right now.
Well, I think it is a little irrational to buy into the left's totally concocted hoax of global warming.
I do think that's a little irrational.
Anybody would say that's not a problem.
He was very early, though.
He jumped in.
He jumped on board very early and bought into global warming.
And he said, you know, the era of Reaganism is over.
Then he runs out and he makes a film on Reagan.
And I just see that he is doing a lot of things.
And it really troubled me when he saw that the Tea Parties were catching on.
And then he very quickly attached himself to the Tea Parties.
Well, again, I think it's a dangerous thing.
Wait a second.
Wait, wait, wait a minute.
He's not the only one trying to co-opt the Tea Parties.
Yeah, there's a whole bunch of people trying to go out there and say that they are the impetus behind the Tea Party.
Look at this, you have to expect this happens.
I mean, I'm not approving it, and I'm not condoning it, but I'm just, you have to understand it.
Here you have a genuine grassroots bubble-up movement.
So you've got all kinds of people who want to claim they had a role in it, or they, even if they don't want to claim they had a role in it, they want to be seen as they just want to be part of the crowd because there'll be a lot of attention focused on these things tomorrow.
So that's standard operating procedure for people who see events like this as an opportunity to further a political career or some other kind of career.
It's natural that that would happen.
Well, I'm just also concerned.
I've been concerned for a while that we're going to end up with a candidate just like last time.
And I think Newt has been positioning himself for a while.
I used to have tremendous respect for Newt Gingrich.
And I don't know at what point he kind of lost his way and got to be one of the inside the beltway elitists.
But I just don't want to be in the same position as last time.
I'd like to have a candidate next time that I could truly get behind.
Well, you know, Newt is a fabulous idea guy.
He's got ideas that grow out of his head like weeds grow in your garden.
They're just constant.
And some of them are good and some of them are brilliant.
And he never stops trying to put them into action.
Newt's, you know, you say that he's, what would you say he used to have tremendous respect, but he's lost his way?
Well, yeah.
And I just think he thinks there's a new way.
Well, I think he thinks that as well.
And I couldn't understand why he said the era of Reaganism was over.
And then he turns around and he makes this film.
Now, I have a suggestion.
You know, I hate seeing you so upset.
You need to take an afternoon off and go spend an afternoon at the Reagan Library.
What do you mean?
What do you mean you hate seeing me so upset?
Well, you've just been in a tremendously bad mood today, and I would like to see you.
How do you know?
I'm listening to your show.
Yeah, I've said I'm in one, but it hasn't sounded that way.
No, but you're clearly, clearly concerned about what's happening.
And I just spent an afternoon at the Reagan Library a couple of weeks ago, and it does wonders for your spirit, Rush.
Go take a day off and go renew yourself.
Oh, renew myself.
I say that, and I lose.
Renewable plugging myself into something.
To renew myself.
No, he, Reagan was up against tremendous opposition and obstacles.
Look, I understand all that.
I have admitted I'm fed up, but I haven't told you why.
You're just assuming so.
Well, when are you going to let us know why?
Well, I'm not going to bleed on you.
I'm not going to tell you why.
It's enough to say I'm fed up, but I'm not going to sit here and whine and moan about it.
Well, other people would do that.
I'm just fed up.
I'm just a foul, rotten humor.
That's all.
Well, these things happen.
You know, even I am human.
I know you are.
And we appreciate all that you do for all of us out there every day.
Well, I appreciate that.
You're most kind.
You really are.
And I renew myself a lot.
Well, every time I go out to renew myself, I'm greeted by a bunch of emails.
Screw you.
Cancel my subscription.
You're never there.
Well, cancel your own subscription, like William Buckley said one day.
Well, I just don't want to have someone get out front too quickly and become the spokesman for the party.
And I don't know.
I think Newt's trying to be all things to all people.
And I'm not sure that that's good for the conservative movement right now.
I don't think you have anything to worry about.
There are so many on our side who already think they're the spokesman for either the Republican Party or the conservative movement or the conservative intelligentsia movement.
Don't sweat it because Newt's got a lot of competition out there from people who think they're going to be or should be or are already the spokesman for the party.
But leadership has a way of surfacing and it surfaces in its own time.
It's just a little soon right now for it to manifest itself.
But it'll happen.
And it's, I don't know who, and I don't know that you're going to dig it, but there will be somebody surface.
If it doesn't, if we end up like last year's primaries.
Yeah, yeah.
All right.
That's true, and it very easily could happen.
Well, I'm going to wear my Operation Chaos hat to the tea party tomorrow until you come up with us at the time.
Congratulations.
I hope you have a great time out there.
Okay.
We'll be thinking about you.
Okay.
That's a right-wing extremist from Delaware.
That's Judy.
We'll be back.
Well, according to the Department of Homeland Security, that woman's going to tea parties as a right-wing extremist.
We'll be back.
Recently, folks, Katie Couric was awarded the Walter Cronkite Journalism Award, I think, from USC, based on her interview with Sarah Palin.
A former talk show host of KFI Los Angeles.
John Ziegler has produced a documentary film entitled Media Malpractice, How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Targeted.
And it's a brilliant contradiction of Katie Couric's previous reports about Sarah Palin.
And there's a website here for you.
You can see it, and we'll put the website link at rushlimbaugh.com so you can click on it rather than have to write this down.
It's howobamagotelected.com.
And it's also going to be screened in theaters nationwide, I think.
Let's see.
Where is this in Louisville and New York this week, St. Louis and Birmingham next week?
How ObamagotElected.com.
And it's a great refutation of this whole notion that Katie Couric, well, not just Katie Couric, but she's the latest link to this.
It's just the whole treatment Pala got, the media malpractice involved in destroying her trying to and elevating Obama.
And Ziegler talked to Sarah Palin about this too, so it's quite instructive.
And we'll put the website link up at rushlimbaugh.com when we update the site later this afternoon.
In Pittsburgh, this is Rob.
Great to have you, sir.
Nice to have you.
How are you?
Thank you, Rush.
It's certainly an honor and a privilege to talk to you.
Thank you.
Getting right to the point, as Bo suggested, you know, I guess I'm a right-wing activist as well.
And I listen to the tea parties.
I listen to all the things that are the grassroots efforts that are going on right now.
And I certainly applaud those efforts.
I think it's great that we are starting to get conservatives that are willing to step forward.
But at the same time, I feel like we're a minor league baseball team taking on the majors.
We don't, we simply, you know, you are a machine.
You have knowledge.
You have insight.
You have the ability to help this woman that you spoke to earlier from Florida to understand a broader sense of what's actually happening.
These tea parties and things, I think, are going to be a success and a failure.
I think that the left has an incredible machine.
I think that they are going to infiltrate these tea parties.
They're going to have racist signs.
They're going to have all sorts of different things out there.
They're going to turn this positive energy that we have against us and use it against us.
And unfortunately, while we're motivated, we don't have the structure.
We don't have the 20 years of training to actually understand how the left machine works.
And we don't want to emulate it because it goes against our core.
And I'm greatly concerned of our ability to actually make a positive change.
I think we're going to actually get slaughtered in this process.
So you think it's just feel-good, basically.
It's not going to accomplish anything.
No, I think it is.
I've tried to involve myself in a couple of things.
I've talked to a number of my friends and others that are involved in this.
And they do feel good about getting together.
They feel good about the concept of throwing some tea bags.
But when it comes to rolling up your sleeves and doing the hard work that has to happen to actually impact change, that goes a little bit too far for them.
Well, throughout the 20 years, it's actually been longer than that, that you're talking about we don't have the training.
Every time the left gins up a protest, large or small, I get calls from people saying, why don't we ever do anything?
How come we never go?
Because we're working.
Well, now we're doing it.
And as your call indicates, even now that we're doing it, some people are still not happy about it.
We still assume that the left is going to co-opt and take over and so forth.
I think the tea parties have a lot of value because they have genuinely bubbled up from real people.
This is not something that some media figure or politician started.
This is something that's bubbling up.
You can say Rick Santelli, CNBC, gave the idea, but he's not allowed to participate in these things from what I know.
But I think it's let the left try to co-opt it.
Let them try.
Everybody knows they're going to try, and we'll see what happens.
The organizers of these events think that they're going to be so big the left is not going to be able to disrupt them.
As to whether or not it's going to make any difference, you've got to start somewhere.
And this is just an indication that there's no leadership out there that these people can rally around, so they're taking it to themselves.
And I don't blame them.
Fastest three hours in media, and they're gone.
Show in the can, but fear not, folks.
We'll be back and start all over again in 21 hours.