All Episodes
Previous Next
March 30, 2009 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:25
March 30, 2009, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Fox News is running a crawl right now, a Chiron graphic at the bottom of the screen.
Obama sends GM and Chrysler back to the drawing board.
That just offends me to no end.
Obama sends them back to the drawing board.
Obama's unhappy with their plan.
Turns out they've got 60 days to come up with a new plan, so why get rid of Wagner?
Greetings.
Welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
Today, the non-profit, this is for March 25th.
The nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom published documents online showing that PETA, people for the ethical treatment of animals, killed 95% of the adoptable pets in its care during 2008.
95% of the adoptable pets in its care wiped out, murdered by PETA.
How about making Michael Vick the spokesman for PETA?
Sounds like a good mix.
I can't help but mention this, folks.
I'm sorry, but there are other things out there, so we're moving on now from the General Motors fiasco here, the Obama fiasco.
Fox did a story just before the previous hour concluded about all of these women worked on Wall Street and other places who are now pole dancing or stripping, working in strip clubs, pole dancing and so forth.
And apparently there's a lot of them.
And I'm sitting here thinking, well, that happened fast.
It didn't require a whole lot of training, did it?
From Wall Street to the poll in one weekend?
Leave your job on Wall Street and show up Saturday night at some strip club?
Why go to Wall Street in the first place if it's that easy to go to a pole dancing place or a strip club?
And what about this?
You lose your job on Wall Street and the first thing you think of is stripping and going to a pole dance place, lap dance place?
And now we're running stories and how wonderful it is?
How exciting it is.
They had one of these babes on being interviewed about it.
I didn't able to listen to it, obviously.
Didn't spend the time to read the closed captioning.
Why even mess around with going to college?
Why go to college?
Why get a job?
Just go to the strip club.
Apparently you can replace your Wall Street job with tips in the strip club.
Oh, is that right?
Oh, is that?
Oh, it's in college where some of them start the training for that?
So there is some training.
Apparently there's some training necessary for this.
I just got a note.
I just got a note.
Actually, at some local gyms here in our area, they're teaching strip dancing.
Really?
You want to name the gym or do you just want to give the neighborhood?
Can anybody walk in off the street and watch the lessons being given?
Oh, can't.
Strip dancing lessons at the local strip club.
I need to do a shout out here to Los Angeles Times columnist, Andrew Clavin.
I hope I'm pronouncing that name right.
K-L-A-V-A-N.
Might be Clavin.
He had a piece on their website and in the print edition of the LA Times yesterday on the op-ed page, Take the Limbaugh Challenge.
If you're reading this newspaper, the likelihood is that you agree with the Obama administration's recent attacks on Rush Limbaugh.
That's the likelihood.
Here's the certainty.
You've never listened to Rush Limbaugh.
Oh, no, you haven't.
Whenever I interrupt a liberal's anti-Limbaugh rant to point out that the ranter has never actually listened to the man, the ranter always says the same thing.
I've heard him.
On further questioning, it always turns out that by heard Limbaugh, the ranter means he's heard the selected excerpts spoon-fed him by the distortion mongers of the mainstream media.
These excerpts are specifically designed to accomplish one thing, and that's to make sure that you never actually listen to Limbaugh's show.
Neck for actually give him a fair chance to speak his piece to you directly.
By lifting some typically Russian piece of outrageous hilarity completely out of context, the distortion gang knows full well that can get you to widen your eyes and open your mouth in the universal sign of liberal outrage.
Your scrawny chest swelling with a warm sense of completely unearned righteousness, you'll turn to your second spouse and say, I'm not a liberal, I'm a moderate, and I'm tolerant of a wide range of differing views, but this Limbaugh goes too far.
There is more untruthfulness in that statement than in a speech by President Obama.
Even the commas are self-deceiving.
You're not a moderate or you wouldn't be reading this newspaper.
You're not tolerant of a wide range of views.
You're tolerant of a narrow spectrum of variations on your own views.
And whenever you claim, you still haven't listened to Rush Limbaugh, which leads to a question.
Why not?
I mean, come on, the guy's one of the figures of the age.
Aren't you even curious?
I listen to all your guys, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, The Times, The New York Times, The New Yorker.
I check out the whole left-wing hallelujah chorus.
Why are you afraid to spend a couple hours listening to Limbaugh's show and seriously considering it?
And why do you disagree with him?
Let me guess at your answer.
You don't need to listen to him.
You've heard enough to know he's A, racist, B, hateful, C, stupid, D, merely an outrageous entertainer, not to be taken seriously, or E, all of the above.
Now, let me tell you the real answer.
Your answer, you're a low-down, yellow-bellied, lily-livered intellectual coward.
You're terrified of finding out he makes more sense than you do.
I listen to Limbaugh every chance I get.
I've never heard the man utter a single racist, hateful, or stupid word.
Do I always agree with him?
Of course not.
I'm a conservative, I think, for myself.
But Limbaugh, by turns insightful, satiric, raucously funny, and wise, is one of the best voices talking about first principles and policy in the country today.
Therefore, I am throwing down my gauntlet to you, you quivering liberal and your feet.
I hereby issue my challenge, the Limbaugh Challenge.
Listen to the show, not for five minutes, but for several hours, an hour a day, for several days.
Consider what he has to say, the real policy material under the jokes and the teasing bluster.
Do what your intellectual keepers do not want you to do.
Keep an open mind.
Ask yourself, what's Limbaugh getting at?
Why does he say the things he says?
Why do so many people of goodwill like that nice Mr. Claven agree with him?
The mainstream media, aka The Matrix, love that.
I love that characterization.
The Matrix.
They don't want you to listen to Limbaugh because they're afraid he'll wake you up and set you free of their worldview.
You don't want to listen to him because you're afraid of the same thing.
You don't believe me?
Well, then gird your loins, gather your courage, accept the limbaugh challenge, see what happens.
I dare you.
Andrew Clavin, contributing editor to City Journal, and he's written a novel for young adults, The Last Thing I Remember, published next month by Thomas Nelson.
And next week, he promises his column will be Hear from Liberals Who Took the Bait.
So apparently he thinks some liberals are going to take his bait and listen to the program and then react to it to him.
So Andrew Clavin, the Limbaugh Challenge, urging all of you liberals who think you know everything about what happens here to actually listen to it.
I have a friend.
I have a friend in this town who's a big, it goes out every night, just socializes all the time, and runs into people, meets them for the first time, and tells them every time he goes out, he calls you, I just ran into another person and he hates your guts.
They never listen to you, but they think they know everything about you.
And I try to explain and they don't know what they get so mad when they hear your name.
He says they even get mad at him for being my friend.
So I know this is a phenomenon that happens.
But these are supposedly the most open-minded among us.
These are the people the most tolerant.
And they are in truth narrow-minded and closed-minded.
By the way, you know those compact fluorescent light bulbs.
Remember the compact fluorescent light bulbs that all you people ran out there, just had to put in your home, save the planet just like you had to turn off your lights on Saturday night for an hour?
Guess what?
Let me just read to you the headline, the New York Times.
Do new bulbs save energy if they don't work?
They don't work.
It sounds like such a simple thing to do, buy some new light bulbs, screw them in, save the planet, but a lot of people these days are finding the new compact fluorescent bulbs anything but simple.
Consumers, we warned you, we warned you at the outset of the mercury in these things, of the haves-mat disposal risks when you have to change one or when one breaks.
How you dispose of them.
You don't just throw them away.
We warned you.
A lot of people are finding the new compact fluorescent bulbs anything but simple.
Consumers who are trying them say they sometimes fail to work or they wear out early.
At best, people discover that using the bulbs requires learning a long list of do's and don'ts.
Take the case of Karen Zurcher and her husband in San Francisco.
Inspired by watching Al Gore's hoax movie.
And by the way, Al Gore left his lights on Saturday night.
There were spies outside his estate in Tennessee.
Al Gore did not turn his lights off Saturday night between 8.30 and 9.30.
So these people, the Zurchers, were inspired by watching his movie.
They decided to swap out nearly every incandescent bulb in their home for the compact fluorescence.
Instead of having a satisfying green moment, however, they wound up coping with a mess.
Here's my sad collection of bulbs that didn't work, Ms. Zurcher said the other day as she pulled a cardboard box containing defunct bulbs from her laundry shelf.
One of these 16 feet electric bulbs or fight electric bulbs, the Zurchers bought it Costco.
It didn't work at all.
Three others died within hours.
The bulbs were supposed to burn for 10,000 hours, meaning it should have lasted years.
It's irritating, Ms. Zurcher said.
Yeah, no, it is, Ms. Zurcher.
It's always so irritating when you fall for a scam because you're too dumb to know.
You should never listen to anything Al Gore says on the environment.
Irritation seems to be rising as more consumers try compact fluorescent bulbs, which now occupy 11% of the nation's eligible sockets.
I wonder how that sounds to people in Rio Linda.
11% of the nation's eligible sockets.
With 330 million bulbs are sold every year, consumers are posting vociferous complaints on the internet after trying these bulbs and finding them lacking.
Some experts who study the issue blame the government for the quality problems, saying an intensive federal push to lower the price essentially backfired by encouraging manufacturers to use cheap components.
You got to love that paragraph.
They don't work because of the government.
Pretty soon your car is not going to work because of the government.
Pretty soon your health care is not going to work because of the government.
Pretty soon your bridge isn't going to work because the government supposedly fixed it.
You know what you ought to do?
This is a New York Times story.
It's from yesterday.
Actually, Saturday.
They buried it on Saturday.
Do new bulbs save energy if they don't work.
We're going to link to this story at rushlimbaugh.com and I want you to do something.
I want you to link to this.
I want you to read it.
And I want every time they mention light bulbs, I want you to substitute health care.
For example, sounds like such a simple thing to do.
Enroll in government health care, screw them in, save the planet.
But a lot of these people are finding that the new health care anything but simple.
Consumers who are trying government health care says it fails to work or wears out early.
At best, people discover that using health care requires a long list of do's and don'ts.
Just substitute health care or then put General Motors in there.
Consumers are supposed to be able to protect themselves by buying bulbs certified under the government's Energy STAR program, but experts and some environmental groups complain that ENERGY STAR standards are weak, permitting low-quality bulbs with too high a level of mercury, toxic metal, contained in all of these bulbs.
It doesn't matter how much or how little there is.
If one of them breaks, you got to call somebody.
You got to go to great pains to clean up the mess, otherwise, keep your cat or dog out of the mess.
You know how little animals run to things that fall on the floor.
Ms. Zurcher, last line of the story.
Talking about her and her husband.
We're both college educated and we pay attention to labels we read.
Feels like somebody forgot to put a place to find the information about these.
Well, two of the problems.
We're both college educated and we pay attention to labels.
We have also found out, ladies and gentlemen, that AIG executives were pressured to donate to Christopher Dodd in the 2006 election cycle.
This is the New York, The Washington Times, rather.
Democrats prepared to take control of Congress after the 06 elections.
A top boss at AIG told colleagues that Dodd was seeking re-election donations and he implored company executives and their spouses to give.
It's a November 17, 2006 email from Joseph Cassano, the AIG Financial Products Chief Executive.
Mr. Dodd was next in line to be chairman of the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee, which oversees our industry, insurance.
He would have the opportunity to set the committee's agenda on issues critical to our industry, so donate to him.
And they did.
They did.
And look what the hell happened to them.
My God, sometimes, you know, I just, I want to go stand on top of the Empire State Building and just shout as loud as I can.
Wake the hell up.
I know how you people, it's so frustrating.
I know how you feel to be surrounded by such ignorance, by sheep who cannot resist the tug of popular sentiment.
I understand how frustrating it is.
All right.
All right.
I have to admit my ignorance.
I find it very difficult doing this because as you know, I am the world's foremost authority, but there are things I have to admit that are going on out there in full view of millions of Americans that I do not know and have never heard of.
And now I'm being inundated with emails from women in the audience.
What are you talking about?
Pole dancing.
Somebody sent me four pages of the books on pole dancing and stripping that you can buy on Amazon.
Pole dancing and stripping are now taught as workouts, as you told me.
How to strip, how to pole dance as a fun way to work out.
I'm entirely ignorant of this.
If I know a woman, and I know women who go to health clubs and work out, I have never had one of them tell me they're pole dancing or stripping in the form as a workout.
I have this view.
I'm going to go to my grave with this view that women are just clean, pure as the wind-driven snow, and then the ones that are not been corrupted are just a very, very small minority.
I know it's old school.
I know it's, don't give me that.
Now it's just for cardio.
Pole dancing and strip dance for cardio.
When I would think that it's not for cardio, I would think it's probably a way to get more women to pay to come to do the workout because there's some component to it that goes beyond just doing your average ordinary Jane Fonda workout.
That's probably the allure, but it just depresses me to find out what's happening to our culture.
It just lets me down.
I mean, it seems like once a month I learn of something going on out there that I don't know about that tells me, yeah, we've lost it.
We're losing the culture.
When snirdly, snirdly, nasty, to a smut king like you, this is good news.
Women leaving Wall Street going to strip clubs and pole dance.
I, frankly, I've never been to one of these places.
I wouldn't go to one of these places.
I've only seen it on The Sopranos.
But I...
Why even go to Wall Street at all then?
Where are the screams of joy at the very mention of my name here?
It used to be a name bump.
Now the name jumps no in there.
Not in there.
Okay, I have a couple little stories here.
I want to detail a couple of soundbites.
We'll get back to your phone calls.
This is from the UK Telegraph.
In the Sunday edition, Barack Obama hands more senior jobs than ever before to sisterhood of black women.
President Obama has engineered a quiet racial revolution in Washington, giving more power to black women than at any point in American political history.
Well, that's all well and good, but why do it undercover?
Why not do this out in the open?
Why not do it with great pride?
Why not have a ceremony?
Why not have a ceremony with all of the sisterhood of black women up there and have them noted and recognized as joining the quiet racial revolution in Washington?
Why do this on the quiet?
Why do this on the down low?
Obama has engineered a quiet racial revolution, giving more power to black women than at any point in American political history.
Why have to do this quietly?
From what is this, the UK Telegraph as well.
He doesn't need a whole lot of black men.
He'll handle that himself.
You got Holder over there.
He doesn't need a quiet revolution of black men.
He's got that handled, snerdly.
A quiet revolution of black women.
Why be quiet about it?
Why not just sing it from the mountaintops?
Big ceremony.
Also from the UK Telegraph.
You know, the UK is so outdoing our own journalists.
Their journalists are so much because they have nothing invested in Obama personally.
Get this, Christopher Booker.
The headline is really all you need to know.
The rise of sea levels is the greatest lie ever told.
Subhead is that the uncompromising verdict of Dr. Mourner is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story.
The rise of sea levels, the greatest lie ever told.
This from Saturday in the UK Telegraph.
Here's Barack Obama.
I talked about how the left thinks that we just have to sacrifice.
We all have to, we must sacrifice.
We have to suffer.
The only way this country will be just and fair is if everybody is equally miserable in their suffering and sacrifice.
And he said it essentially on Face the Nation yesterday.
Bob Schieffer talked about announcing his plans today on the takeover of General Motors and Canning, the CEO.
What are these companies going to have to do, President Obama, in order to get additional bailout money?
We think we can have a successful U.S. auto industry, but it's got to be one that's realistically designed to weather this storm and to emerge at the other end much more lean, mean, and competitive than it currently is.
And that's going to mean a set of sacrifices from all parties involved.
Management, labor, shareholders, creditors, suppliers, dealers.
Everybody's going to have to come to the table and say it's important for us to take serious restructuring steps now in order to preserve a brighter future down the road.
He keeps talking about this brighter future down the road, but then always throws cold water on it.
Threw cold water on it today.
I can't save your job.
I can't guarantee your job's going to be saved.
I can't guarantee that your plant's going to stay open.
I can't guarantee that there's going to be an auto industry.
But I'm not taking it over either, even though I just fired the CEO.
But I can guarantee you that every damn one of you is going to sacrifice.
Every damn one of you is going to suffer because somehow sacrifice has become the new patriotism.
Now, sacrifice is all well and good when you talk about the sacrifices military men and women make.
But in the context of American exceptionalism, sacrifice, sacrifice doesn't build things.
Not the way he's talking about it.
He doesn't mean the virtue of sacrifice.
And I don't want to upset any of you, Ayn Rand supporters.
I know what I'm talking about here when it comes to sacrifice, but he looks at it as some sort of virtuous thing to be miserable, to be in sacrifice.
Somehow that's fair.
That's going to make America what America should be.
It's just scary because he's going to ensure it.
He's going to make sure that there's sacrifice.
And that's what his administration is all about.
Sunday morning, the syndicator program Our World with Black Enterprise, the host Ed Gordon and Vibe magazine editor-in-chief Danielle Smith have this exchange about some Democrats and the way they're feeling toward President Obama.
Let's talk about Democrats.
There is, whether we like to believe it or not, a sense of sometimes in-house jealousy.
It's not just Rush Limbaugh who maybe quietly says, I don't want this man to succeed.
There are those who, in fact, but there are those who, in fact, are saying it quietly.
That's always the case in Washington.
I just want everybody to be realistic.
You know, he is no messiah, so he hasn't changed Washington's thought altogether.
So there's Ed Gordon.
He says that there's Democrats that want him to fail too, based on people are jealous.
There are Democrats that have jealous and envy.
They don't want him to succeed because then he'll freeze them out.
That's what Ed Gordon's point is.
Danielle Smith then said this about Obama and patriotism.
In the last administration where patriotism was always on the table.
You were a patriot if you did this, you weren't a patriot if you did that.
And I just think that it is sort of time right now for a new kind of patriotism.
And I think it's the kind of patriotism that does not allow for people to say, and I hate to use this word allow because of my belief in free speech, but to say that I want the president to fail when we are in this city.
I don't care if the president is me or you.
Whoever is in that office right now as a country, it seems to me that we need to come together with some patience and some sacrifice and help this man succeed.
What happens if he does in fact fail?
Where will we be then?
Well, Danielle, let me just tell you, based on what we've seen with General Motors and the banks, if he fails, America is saved.
Barack Obama's policies and their failure is the only hope we've got to maintain the America of our founding.
We can sit here all day as we have.
We can rail against what he's doing to General Motors.
We can rail against it.
There's nothing to stop any of this.
Nothing stopping it.
I can say all day long, gosh, I hope this fails.
It ain't going to stop anything.
Republicans, anybody heard a Republican say anything today about the firing of Rick Wagner?
If they have, it hadn't been reported.
Republicans, as usual, are a week behind times.
They're still out there rapping about the budget, which is okay.
The budget needs to be rapped about.
We'll rap about it further.
But I mean, the big news of the day, I haven't heard a Republican, I haven't seen any media who find anything the slightest bit squishy about this.
When the history of this is written, people are going to say, where was the media?
Where were the Republicans?
Where were all of the moderate Republicans who told us that this guy's temperament and his steadiness and his intellect, that's why we should support him?
Well, remember, it's not what Obama knows.
It's what you think he knows.
It's what he makes you think he knows.
He ain't annoying about the automobile business.
He doesn't know how to change a tire.
The automobile business needs car guys, people that love Greece, get in there, manufacture these engines and cars, great designs, lines, make people want to go out and buy these cars.
Car companies have to be run by financial people today because they're basically health care and retirement funds.
The side business is making cars, hoping that they pay for some of it.
All right, Doug in Passerobles, California.
I'm glad you waited.
You're next on the EIB network, sir.
Hello.
Mega Dittos Rush from Passerobles out here in the Citric Coast of taxation.
Yes, yes, yes.
So my question to you, and this is from a first-time caller, a long-time listener.
I've been listening to you for about half my life, which would be 20 years since I was in college, is what industry is Obama going to nationalize next?
Is it going to be timber, oil, ag, utility companies?
Which next environmental thing will he go after?
It's a wild guess.
I don't think he'll so much go after timber, and he's not going to go after any of the ingredients necessary to make a teleprompter.
But I wouldn't be surprised.
I'll tell you what's going to happen at some point, just because of inflation, gasoline is going to skyrocket as is oil, and that's going to be the next industry.
Maxine Waters has already told us.
Maxine Waters already says, your profits are too high.
We need to run your companies.
I think the next industry that they're going to target somehow will be big oil.
Back.
Well, big health, big pharmaceutical, big doctor, big whatever evil components there are in the healthcare industry.
They're already targeting them.
But it'll be big oil.
Back after this.
Stay with us.
More details on this tomorrow, but I just want to read you the first line of this story from Health Daily News.
You know, remember now, last week, a giant sunstorm is going to wipe us out by 2012.
Watching your favorite NFL team lose in the Super Bowl could actually end your life, according to a new study.
Every day, there is a new apocalyptic story that tells us that by things we do to enjoy life, we can die.
If this were true, Buffalo should be a ghost town.
They lost the Super Bowl four straight years.
It's not a ghost town, snurdly, and don't say that we're big.
In fact, we own Buffalo.
Rush, people are asking you, well, did I hear you say carbonite's available for the Mac now?
Yes.
Carbonites, you didn't think so, did you?
Carbonite is available for the Mac.
It's a computer backup system.
It's an online, off-site backup system for your hard drive.
And if you're new to computers or if you're not, if you're new, you're going to lose data on your hard drive.
It's going to jam.
It's going to stop.
It's going to break.
You're going to spill something.
And something's going to happen.
It always does.
It's happened a number of times to me over the 25, 30 years I've been using computers.
And knowing that, back it up.
Have the data backed up.
The more you use the computer, the more vitally important data you put on your hard drive.
Carbonite backs up off-site, but online.
You start by your initial backup.
I found when I did, and I did it last week.
In fact, my first backup, my initial, is still ongoing.
It's going to be two to three weeks.
Well, Dawn, it's not carbonite.
It's upload speeds with your internet connection.
The most it can do is two to four gigs a minute, unless you're on a T3 or some other connection.
I mean, but download speeds are nowhere near as slow, or upload speeds, nowhere near as fast as download speeds.
It's not Carbonite's fault.
Now, depending on how big your hard drive is, mine's going to take three weeks because of the size of my hard drive.
But then once it's done, it only backs up things that have changed from the last time.
And it backs up automatically every time you're logged onto the internet.
And you don't see it.
It just happens.
And you'll forget that it's taking place until you need it.
And then you'll be so thankful that you backed it up.
Your files are priceless.
If you lose them and you can't get them back, you don't want to experience that nor the feeling.
Just go to carbonite.com.
Use the offer code Rush to sign up.
It's a free 15-day trial, and you don't have to give them a credit card for the first 15 days.
At least I didn't when I signed up.
Just took it, ran with it.
Decide in 15 days.
If you don't like it after 15 days, cancel it.
Your backup's gone.
You can do something else.
Less than five bucks a month.
Offer code RushCarbonite.com.
Be patient.
It may show no activity for the first five or six hours when you start.
Just hang with it, because it's working.
It just may take a while to display.
Don in Raleigh, North Carolina.
Great to have you here, sir.
Hello.
Yeah, hey, Rush.
Megadittos.
And I just want to quickly say thanks for getting me through the Clinton years.
I couldn't have got through them without you.
Thank you, sir, very much.
Happy to be the leader.
Well, great.
Great to have you there.
But I was just calling to react to something you said earlier today.
And that is that there's a line that politicians have the power to cross, but they shouldn't.
And Obama continues to cross-that they haven't.
Lincoln crossed the line with habeas corpus back in the Civil War, took some measures there, but they were restored.
But even in World War II, FDR did nothing like what Obama's doing.
And once that line is crossed, they don't give it up.
They don't go back.
Yeah.
Well, I could not imagine Ronald Reagan doing some of these things.
And because of his character and the fact that he had such great respect for our liberty and our system of free enterprise, I mean, he just wouldn't do that.
And I think all of this is displaying Obama's character or lack thereof and which, again, you know, that was all covered up during the campaign last year.
And all these people that voted for him, you know, now we're paying attention.
I know what you mean.
I know when you talk about his character, you're talking about who he is, who reared him, who raised him, who mentored him, who his association.
I agree.
They're all important.
They were covered up.
He's a radical guy.
This is a very arrogant, radical guy who is angry.
Nobody will convince me otherwise.
I mean, he doesn't show it.
And sometimes I think I notice it.
I mean, I think it flares at some time.
Not the anger, but he reveals that he has a bunch of chips on his shoulder.
And we know his wife does.
And we know Reverend Wright does.
And we're getting, you know, a lot of this stuff that's happening right out of Reverend Wright's sermons.
Yeah, I mean, it really is.
And a lot of what's going to happen in education right out of Bill Ayers' curriculum, his extremist terrorist buddy.
So I think we've got a guy.
The best way to understand Obama, and I can't say this enough, he really believes that it's his job to return the nation's wealth to its rightful, quote-unquote, rightful owners.
And that means that he believes the people who have wealth have stolen it from those who have no wealth.
It's been unfairly achieved and accrued, and it's his job to take it and redistribute it.
And that's what he means by sacrifice.
When he talks about sacrifice, he's talking about raising your taxes, taking away your assets, and giving them to other people he thinks you stole them from, who are thus more deserving.
And you can see it, if you'll just be open to admit it, you can see it practically every day in his policy pronouncements.
We'll be back.
Hey, when are some Detroit politicians?
I don't have enough time to develop.
Detroit politicians are when are they going to demand fairness and equality?
What's happening?
I'll explain this tomorrow.
It's a good way to tease you.
▲
Export Selection