All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 6, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:16
November 6, 2008, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings, my friends, and welcome Rush Limbaugh, America's real anchorman, the doctor of democracy with a full waving room again today, and America's truth detector.
Great to have you with us.
The fastest three hours in media roll on.
Here it is already Thursday, and it's already the second hour on Thursday.
Telephone number 800-282-2882 if you'd like to be on the program.
Email address lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
Let me expand on my Rahm Emmanuel theory.
And it's fascinating the way Obama did this.
Obama publicly says, I'm going to offer the gig of chief of staff to Rahm Emmanuel.
Now, a lot of people don't understand why it's a big deal, whoever the chief of staff is.
The chief of staff sets the ideological tone in the White House.
You don't get to see the president without the approval of the chief of staff.
The chief of staff is who really deals with all the staff.
Some of the staff will occasionally be invited into the Oval Office to share their ideas or whatever, Obama, but the chief of staff will always be in there along with the, if there is one.
Bush had a chief of staff all the time, but he also had Rove in there.
The chief of staff with Obama is probably going to see to it that there isn't a Rove in the Obama White House.
I mean, there'll be a Rove, but he'll be in his office, and he'll communicate with Obama via memo to the chief of staff.
Now, the chief of staff, this is one of the most partisan Democrats around.
He is a thug Democrat, takes no prisoners.
He has no desire to get along with anybody on the other side or traitorous leftists.
If he thinks liberals are traitoring him out, go after them too.
But that's what it is.
And this, by the way, argues against this whole notion that so many doofuses on our side are now saying that there's going to be a centrist Obama.
There's no way that the appointment of Emmanuel alone dispels the notion that there's anything centrist about this.
But two things.
Now, some are going to disagree with me about this because Rah Emmanuel also worked in the Clinton White House and Clinton tried to sell out Israel a number of times.
You know, Arafat was the number one guest in Clinton's White House, other than the women.
And so people think, well, Emmanuel was there and it didn't matter.
It didn't matter to Emmanuel that Clinton was trying to sell out Israel.
I think this is a little bit different because with Obama, let's be honest.
There are a lot of people in the Muslim world who think, and this is not me saying, don't associate me with this, but we know this to be true.
There are a lot of Muslims around the world who believe that they finally got one of theirs in the White House.
Barack Hussein Obama.
They think that they've got somebody there.
They know he's a radical leftist.
And they think he's at least sympathetic because they too are downtrodden.
They think like African Americans in this country are downtrodden.
So they think they've got a sympathetic figure at least in the White House.
Somebody who is not going to have it in for terrorism as much as George W. Bush did.
Somebody who's not going to be as prone to use force.
They think all of this.
Now, all of a sudden, he names as his concigliary, as his enforcer, as his capo de tuti, Rah Emmanuel.
Rah Emmanuel is all the other things I said, plus he's Jewish.
Now, this sends a signal to the Arab world that conflicts with what they believe.
They're probably going to give it some time here.
But my guess is, my theory, my theory, and I could be wrong about this, but my theory is that we also know in the Muslim world that they have, I forget the word for it.
They have a word for Muslims who flee the faith and join some other religion.
And, of course, they put out fatwas on them like Solomon Rushdie and this sort of thing.
I think it's entirely possible that when all is said and done, these people in the Islamic Muslim world who think they've got a Sympatico in the White House are going to hate his guts.
They're going to end up hating his guts.
They're going to think that he's a sellout.
They're going to think that he abandoned it.
They're going to think that he somehow has sold them out.
Not personally, but they're strict code of conduct with their religion and so forth.
And if that is the case, and this is just, it's a big if, and it's just my theorem.
But if it's a big case, if it's true, then the Arab world might get even angrier at us than they already are.
So we shall see, ladies and gentlemen, we shall see.
Also, coming up later in the program, Snerdley was telling me during the top of the hour break, I can't believe what I just learned.
1.3 million volunteers.
Obama had 1.3 million volatility.
I said, Snerdley, you're behind the times.
It's not 1.3, just 1.3 volunteers.
It's all of the internet network that he put together.
Let me tell you what else is going to happen.
All you people that think Obama is going to govern from the center.
And let me, to set this up, let me ask you if you remember Dingy Harry and Pelosi bending over and grabbing the ankles at every moveon.org meeting or at every daily cause convention or whatever.
They bent over and grabbed the ankles for these left-wing extremist websites, these kook websites, because they send a lot of money in.
You're going to have this Obama volunteer network and this Obama internet network, Acorn and all these people, if they're not already, they're going to be in Washington or outside.
They're going to be harassing every elected official they can who stands in Obama's way.
If Obama wants to raise the top marginal tax rate to 90%, any Democrat in the Congress who opposes this is going to hear about it from Obama's network, and they're going to threaten.
They're going to threaten a loss of funds.
They're going to threaten being targeted at the next election.
This is not...
Why do we want to sit here and deny who this guy is?
Why do people on our side want to deny his roots?
Why do we want to deny what we know?
There's a great article here by Quinn Hillier in the American Spectator.
And you know what it's entitled?
Saul Olinski Takes the White House.
And that's exactly what has happened.
The original community organizer, Saul Olinski, has taken the White House.
Now, not literally, because he has assumed room temperature, but his disciples have taken over.
I'm going to give you the details of this after the break.
But first, here is what I promised: four soundbites of the drive-bys trying to figure out who this guy is.
I think it's amazing the CYA that's just starting to effervesce here in the drive-by media.
Let me start out by sharing with you what Jennifer Lovin, who part of the White House press corps, who just hated Bush, I mean, was just relentless in her pursuit of Bush and the press secretaries.
Great expectations.
Obama will have to deliver is the headline.
Over and over, Barack Obama told voters if they stuck with him, we will change this country and change the world.
They did.
Now their expectations for him deliver are firmly planted on his shoulders.
Many supporters greeted his victory with euphoria.
And then read down and read down and read down, you get to this from Jennifer Lovin.
Even after nearly two years in the spotlight, little is understood about the 47-year-old senator's approach to leadership.
His resume, community organizer.
Eight years as a state legislator, less than four as a U.S. senator.
As a lawmaker, he displayed a knack for working with Republicans on a handful of favorite issues.
That's a lie, but he has devoted most of his time in the Senate to running for president.
Personally, he's a bit of an enigma, too.
One of the many revelers who spontaneously flocked to the White House after Obama's win was waving signs like, why wait, evict Bush now.
So here's Jennifer Lovin.
He really's an enigma.
We don't know who he is.
We don't know much about him.
Didn't do much.
Resume is kind of thin.
Where was this beforehand?
Friday night, let's go back.
Do you want to laugh?
Friday night, Charlie Rose showed Tom Brokaw and Charlie Rose.
I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
No, I don't know.
I don't know how he really sees where China is.
We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
I don't really know.
And do we know anything about the people who are advising them?
You know, it's an interesting question.
He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational speeches.
I don't know what books he's read.
What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
There's a lot about him we don't know.
That's Tom Brokaw.
Grab number three real quick, Mike.
Grab Zoundbite number three.
Tom Brokaw and Charlie Rose admitting a dono diddly squat.
All they had to do was assign a reporter.
You had 18 months or two years to find out about the guy.
Just assign a reporter.
Tom, you work at NBC News.
Here's Brokaw, by the way.
This is this morning on Scarborough's show.
Mika Bzezinski says, potentially, this is a great opportunity for Republicans because that perception of fear versus hope, I think in some ways is unfair.
And there may be some time for now, I don't know, true Republicanism and new stars to be born.
Everybody's going to have to examine the instruments, if you will, of polarization.
Talk radio is a piece of that.
It's in the interest of some people out there to try to keep this going.
And it's in their narrow self- You talk about talk radio, which really was an instrument in the 90s.
I must say, in this century, the internet is so hateful.
Fine and dandy, but did you hear what Brokaw said?
We've got to do something.
We've got to examine the instruments of polarization.
Talk radio is a piece of that.
You know who the greatest polarizers in this country are?
The drive-by media.
NBC, CBS, ABC, New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times, on down the line.
They are the great polarizers, if you will.
I just wanted to throw that in.
All right, so we've played, we've played, as he got out of order here.
Yeah, but I can't find the number eight because I've used number.
Here are the other bites.
Go ahead and play this one.
Saul Olinski really was a model from this famous community organizer in Chicago.
And this whole idea that Olinski had that it's not going to work if you offend large groups of people.
You know, we think of community organizers having their fist out and, you know.
No, You have to win over the majority by being peaceful and non-threatening.
Saul Olinski used the word non-threatening.
This is key to Obama.
There's no militancy involved.
This is very important.
And his chief strategist, Axelrod, really understood this.
Especially if you're running a black guy for president, you cannot threaten the whites.
Now, this, that was Evan Thomas of Newsweek magazine as Charlie Rose show.
And Rose said, Evan, give me the early beginnings for Obama and his team.
What kind of campaign did he want to run?
Because I'm fascinated by the idea of what he set the standards, suggested going to be from the bottom up.
A community organizer might suggest as a way to achieve a result.
So here's Evan Thomas at Newsweek telling us all about the Saul Alinsky way after the election.
They knew who this guy was.
They know who this guy is.
Saul Alinsky was a model for this community organizer in Chicago.
This whole idea that Alinsky had, it's not going to work if you offend large groups of people.
Be non-threatening.
Here's Charlie Rose again, who spoke to both Evan Thomas and John Meekum of Newsweek magazine.
Meekum added this to what you just heard.
He is very elusive, Obama, which is fascinating for a man who's written two memoirs.
In Grant Park, he walks out with the family, and then they go away.
Biden's back, you know, locked in the bar or something.
You know, they'll let him out.
And have you ever seen a victory speech where there was no one else on stage?
No adoring wife, no cute kid?
He is the message.
There is a slightly creepy cult of personality about all this.
I mean, he's such an absolute.
Slightly creepy cult of personality.
Yes.
What's slightly creepy about it?
It just makes me a little uneasy that he's so singular.
He's clearly managing his own spectacle.
He's a deeply manipulative guy.
Good grief.
I can't.
I mean, I believe it, but I don't believe it.
They know all this.
They knew all this before.
I even made this point yesterday.
I've never seen an acceptance speech where the family's not there.
Bring the wife and kids out in a weird-looking dress, send her backstage, get rid of the kids, and go out and make the speech.
There's big crowds manipulative.
These are the people swooning all over this guy during the campaign.
Now they're setting this up because they don't know what he's going to do or they're worried that they do know what he's going to do.
And they're just concerned.
And there's one more here.
This is the final exchange.
Charlie Rose, Evan Thomas, John Meekum.
Watching him last night in that speech.
He finishes, and he's sort of, it's almost like he then ascends to look at this circumstance.
He watches us watching him.
Exactly.
He does.
It's too amazing.
It is amazing.
He writes about this metaphor being a screen upon which Americans will project.
He said they want Barack Obama.
I'm not sure I am Barack Obama.
He has the self-awareness to know that this creature he's designed isn't necessarily a real person.
And he's self-aware enough.
To listen to these drive-bys and these elitists now, after the election, describe their total lack of understanding who Obama is, yet they do understand things about him that are not good.
He's manipulative.
He ascends after his speech to watch everybody watching him.
He watches us watch him.
He's slightly creepy, and he has the self-awareness to know that this creature he's designed isn't necessarily a real person.
All right, now that you have heard these sound bites of John Meekum and Evan Thomas at Newsweek discussing with Charlie Rose just who is Obama, I want to play them again, two of them.
And I want you to look at them in a little bit of a different light.
You remember shortly after Bill Clinton was in office, maybe he'd been in office a year, he went out to Catalina Island off San Diego, and some Washington Post reporter wrote this piece about the power crackling in his jeans.
Well, this is better than that.
But the difference is that power crackling in the jeans was envy, it was praise, it was idolatry, awe.
This is fear.
This, what they're saying about Obama, these drive-bys, this is fear.
Now, these two bites confirm for all of us that they are irresponsible in doing their jobs.
They know all this.
They have these fears beforehand.
They viewed it as their job to get Obama elected, burying what they feared, burying what they know.
They really have lost their credibility.
I don't see how they get it back.
But I want you to listen to this.
These two guys, again, these next two bites, within the context that they are scared.
Here's the first of the two, John Meekum talking with Evan Thomas and Charlie Rose about Obama.
He is very elusive, Obama, which is fascinating for a man who's written two memoirs.
In Grant Park, he walks out with the family, and then they go away.
Biden's back, you know, locked in the bar or something.
You know, they don't let him out.
And have you ever seen a victory speech where there was no one else on stage?
No adoring wife, no cute kid?
He is the message.
There is a slightly creepy cult of personality about all this.
I mean, he's such an absolute.
Slightly creepy cult of personality.
Yes.
What's slightly creepy about it?
It just makes me a little uneasy that he's so singular.
He's clearly managing his own spectacle.
He's a deeply manipulative guy.
Now, let me tell you what they're saying that they're not saying.
We've seen this before.
We have seen this before.
We have seen this creepy cult of personality.
We have seen this singular managing his own spectacle.
We've seen this deeply manipulative guy.
We have seen this before.
They are scared.
They are not saying that, but I hear fear.
Here's the next bite.
Charlie Rose continues here with a question.
Watching him last night in that speech, he finishes, and he's sort of, it's almost like he then ascends to look at this circumstance.
He watches us watching him.
Exactly.
He does amazing.
It is amazing.
He writes about this metaphor being a screen upon which Americans will project.
He said they want Barack Obama.
I'm not sure I am Barack Obama.
He has the self-awareness to know that this creature he's designed isn't necessarily a real person.
And he's self-aware enough.
Ah, Charlie Rose's alike goes off.
Ah!
Self-aware enough to know that this creature he's designed isn't necessarily a real person.
That is fear.
These guys are looking at Obama just as, and they've seen him the exact way we have all of this time.
They only now, after they think they got him into office, are now starting to talk about their fears about how nobody knows anything about him.
His resume is thin.
He's only written two books and they're autobiographies.
We don't know what other books he's read.
Yes, we do.
We don't know anything about him.
This creepy.
Never seen a victory speech with nobody on stand.
What is this making fun of Biden, by the way?
Locking Biden in the bar so he doesn't come out.
Look at all they hid.
Look at all that they refuse to report.
They have plenty of chances to write editorials at Newsweek magazine.
And they didn't write one reflective of what they really saw and know and fear about Obama.
And we're back.
El Rushbo, the cutting-edge societal evolution.
As usual, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Back to the fawns to Huntington, Indiana.
This Duane, and you're up, sir.
Nice to have you with us.
Thank you, Rush.
You and Bo and the staff are doing God's work.
Thank you.
My remark is addressed to Senator McCain or any of his staff that might be listening.
I have one final suggestion for you, Senator, from a 59-year conservative activist in the party.
Reach out, take a step, reach out across the aisle one more time, grope for a comfortable seat, sit down and remain there.
We have no more room for Democrat light.
Dwayne, I just want to make sure that I understand your command to Senator McCain.
Yes.
You're saying that when he walks across the aisle again to stay there, you want him to officially become a Democrat.
Yes, and perhaps the people of Arizona next time can find a Republican.
Well, let's see.
Who else?
I have one more footnote if you have time.
Well, yeah, I'm still pondering this.
He could at least become an independent since his party rejected him.
I think it's high time that we told these moderate who are nothing more than Democrat-light that they go over where they're more comfortable.
They can perhaps help the Messiah with his program of Marxizing the Americans.
Look at it.
I could not agree with you more.
And I myself said as much on previous occasions of this program.
What are you guys messing around trying to screw up our party for?
Just go join the people that you have all this love for.
You like literary people.
You like writers.
You like people who you think communicate very well.
It doesn't matter what they say.
It doesn't matter that it could be socialists.
It doesn't matter.
It could be extreme leftists.
You like them?
Go join them.
Just make it official.
Leave us alone.
Don't try to reform our party to make them just like you already got a party that you like or that you admire.
Go join them.
This is going to be an epic battle, I fear.
I think that because it's going to come down to what it always comes down to.
It's going to come down to people who think they're the smart people, the elites, versus the people they think are not smart people and Hicks, and that would be all of us, including you and me, and try to say, we're the reason that all these elections are being lost.
They are the reason.
It's going to be a big, big, big, big battle.
Now, back, ladies and gentlemen, to this notion.
So many of these people we're talking about, by the way, so many of our wizards are smart.
Oh, yeah.
We got to give Obama the benefit of the doubt.
Oh, yeah.
You're going to govern from the center out there.
Quinn Hrier today in The American Spectator.
Conservatives may not realize just how difficult it might be to recover from this week's elections.
Too many conservatives think that we've seen all this before, 1964, 1974, 1992, and we know how to handle it.
Well, we're not dealing with the same sorts of opponents today.
These new Alinskyites who are taking over the White House combined with the most leftist congressional leadership in memory will not let us play by the same rules under which conservatives recovered from those earlier debates.
They will end debacles.
They will try to drastically tilt the playing field, seed our side of the field with landmines, and in short, rig the process to make it next to impossible for the political right or Republicans to recover.
And they're likely to succeed in at least some of these designs.
It will begin with their efforts to secure a filibuster-proof majority of 60 senators, including the two independents.
And by the way, Lieberman wants a confab with Reed.
Reed wants a confab with Lieberman.
Reed is going to threaten Lieberman with his committee chairmanship, Homeland Security.
Lieberman's probably going to say, I don't want to lose that.
I'm with you, Harry.
I'll make sure you have your 60 votes.
And yes, all the Democrat senators, with the possible exception of Ben Nelson of Nebraska, are liberals.
Lieberman is a fine man.
He's a liberal.
He's an independent Barney Sanders, Bernie Sanders, whatever, independent socialist.
The Libs have 56, three Republican moderates and one conservative leading their races but awaiting recounts or runoffs.
Watch for the Alenskyites to try stealing all four of these Senate races in question.
They are Norm Coleman, Saxby Chambliss, Gordon Smith in Oregon, and what's the other one?
Who?
Oh, Gordon Smith lost today.
Oh, he's in.
Okay.
Oh, you didn't hear that.
Okay, so Smith's gone.
So it puts him up to 57, right?
They put him up 57.
We have seen this game before.
They did it in Indiana's bloody 8th congressional district in 1984.
They almost succeeded in 2000 in Florida.
They did succeed in Washington State, the governor's race in 2004, where a recount produced more votes for the governor than there were people who lived there.
Those are just the most obvious of many similar examples.
And now they are even more ruthless.
They're more lawyered up and in a more powerful position to pull it off than they were in any of the previous instances, 64, 74, and 92.
Next, watch what happens if they regularly can't peel off enough Republicans or hold their own semi-fair-minded people like Nelson and Lieberman to overcome whatever filibuster attempts Republicans do mount.
Watch for an assault on the filibuster itself.
Watch how they use as precedent the GOP nuclear constitutional option on judges in 2005.
Except instead of just using it for judges, watch them use it against all filibusters.
It's really easy.
You make the ruling from the chair that the filibuster is out of order for some reason.
Instruct the parliamentarian to rule in their favor.
Win the appeal of the parliamentarians' ruling by simple majority vote.
Then watch the courts pronounce it an internal matter of a legislative bench, a branch and thus outside of courtroom purview, and bam, they've got the filibuster.
Watch a cheerleading establishment media actually back these lefty maneuvers.
It's all in the name of one-man, one-vote democracy, don't you know?
The filibuster once served its purpose, they'll say, but as a vestige of Southern massive resistance to integration, it's now being used for massive resistance to the first black president, which invalidates it as a legitimate tool.
Watch the left use these tactics in others to pass even more liberalized voting laws, an open invitation to even more fraud that is more creative, easier to hide, and less challengeable in court.
Other ways, the Obama axis will tilt the playing field.
Card-check legislation to eliminate secret ballots in unionizing and to force union victories in contract negotiations.
Provision after provision, giving favors to the trial bar so it can sue enemies into submission.
Only when the time is right and the ground or air has been well prepared will come the granddaddy of all fights, the reenactment of the misnamed fairness doctrine.
They'll be clever, too.
They'll pick their spot.
They'll wait until Limbaugh, Levin, Hannity says something innocent they can twist out of context and call hate speech.
And then they'll highlight some schoolyard fight where a member of a victim group gets the worst of it as if the attack were caused by talk radio, making it hate written, a call of hate radio, which will be the new moniker that the fifth column fourth estate media hangs on the talkmeisters.
And even before imposing the fairness doctrine, they'll use the FCC in other ways to put a muffler on their opponents.
By the way, speaking of that, Henry Waxman, who is the most, I don't know, well, aside from partisan, he's a partisan leftist radical.
Apart from that, this guy holds more hearings and investigations than anybody in Congress, and he has entered into a battle now.
He's asked Pelosi to give him oversight over the FCC and take it away from John Dingell, who's already had global warming taken away from him by Pelosi.
The erosion of conservative rights will be incremental.
Each one will have its own justification.
Each one will be supported by the establishment media.
Each one will be timed so as to allow the general public to become accustomed to it, to accept it as unremarkable, or even to come to regard it as a public good for the sake of keeping conservative troublemakers from fomenting disorder.
These are all the things that Alinskyites do.
These are the sorts of tactics used by ACORN, at whose conferences Obama himself regularly taught seminars on power.
These are the sorts of policies favored by the academic left, Obama's old milieu, the policies that favor speech codes and stolen campus newspapers and the firing of faculty for offensive remarks.
Now, conservatives have fought things like this for years already, but they've never fought it while the left controlled so many of the levers of power.
And certainly not when the left was led by such a charismatic and near-cult-inspiring leader who was so smart, so well-steeped in these stratagems, and so fully supported by a media whose legs tingle and run warm every time he waxes eloquent.
It'll take a very focused, very intelligent, very skillful action by conservatives to stop this creeping subversion of a free society.
This is a whole different political battlefield than any on which we fought before, and we haven't yet found our Omar Bradley.
That's Quinn Hillier today in the American Spectator.
Here is Frank Grieve from McClatchy newspapers.
This is the drive-bys.
Quinn Hillier is one of us.
How will President Obama deploy his internet army?
A powerful new lobbying force coming to town, Obama's triumphant army of 3.1 million internet-linked donors and volunteers.
See, Snerdley, it's not just the 1.9 volunteers.
It's the internet donors in a mass email thanking them.
Written moments before his Grant Park speech, Obama put them on notice.
We have a lot to do to get our country back on track.
I'll be in touch soon about what comes next.
This again aimed at all of you dunces out there who think that we're going to get a centrist government out of Obama.
How Obama will use these laptop cadres is unclear.
So is the extent to which they'll rally behind his priorities.
Joe Trippy, the internet politics guru whose computer geeks made Howard Dean what he was, offers a provocative and educated guess.
Joe Trippy predicted that Obama would use his forces first and foremost to intimidate congressional foes of his agenda, then to rally his allies and forge one of the most powerful presidencies in American history.
Because his internet operation was miles ahead of McCain's, Obama's liberal to libertarian electronic activists are in a position to dominate the new political medium, much as conservative Republicans dominate talk radio.
We really know who Obama's community leaders are, issue by issue, said Thomas Genzemer, the managing director of Blue State Digital, a Washington-based mobilizer of online communities.
Trippy said this, Obama will be able to say, these are the 10 members of Congress standing in our way on health care.
Basically, it'll be the president and the people united with some members of Congress in between, which won't be a very comfortable place to be.
Let me translate this for you.
3.1 volunteers and internet donors, all continuing to get blast emails from the Obama campaign.
The Obama presidency will continue in campaign mode, just as Clinton's did.
What they're going to do is find somebody to send the emails out on whatever issue it is.
Obama wants tax rate to 90%.
Obama wants whatever he wants.
If he runs into trouble, he tells these 3.1 million people, we got these 10 congregations, and it could be Democrats.
We got these 10 Congress and these two senators.
They're providing us problems.
We need you to really go after them.
Here comes the internet onslaught.
And we've seen how Harry Reid and Pelosi bent over, grabbed the ankles for moveon.org and Daily Cause.
So I mentioned all this.
This is just, right now it's prediction and speculation.
But I far believe most of this than I believe this silly notion that Obama is going to be a harmless little centrist because he knows he can't go very far.
The economy is so bad.
He's not going to be able to raise taxes.
There's nothing to tax.
There's no capital gains to tax.
This is why we spent two years learning who Obama is.
This is why we spent years learning about his past and who his alliances are with, the things the drive-bys were not interested in, the things McCain were not interested in.
We know why he sought the office.
He sought the office to accomplish all this radical stuff.
He's not doing this singularly because of an ego, like many people who run for office.
This is serious, serious stuff.
Quinn Hildier's right.
You know, we've not faced a playing field like this in these previous instances.
Now, we can get geared up for it, and we can give them a good game and contest this.
But they're going to have, you know, Obama's going to be, he'll do and his team are going to get whatever they want.
And it doesn't matter if it's Democrats standing in the way.
If they have to be intimidated, if they have to be thrown overboard, if they have to be told they're not getting any campaign money, including Pelosi, by the way.
There's going to be one guy running this show in Washington.
It's not going to be Pelosi.
It's not going to be Reed.
They think, maybe, that they can roll this new guy.
They think that they can maybe make sure that he gets some lessons taught.
These barons in Congress, they're the ones that really run the show.
Let's wait and see.
I don't think anybody has any idea what's ahead for them other than us who are watching back after this.
By the way, the Cybercast News service today has a really nice story on Brenda Davis from Kerrville, Texas, who we gave the car to.
She ended up choosing a Chevrolet Tahoe.
She was torn between that and a suburban.
And she chose the Tahoe.
She's the woman that called here last week.
She was just worn out.
Her husbands have a jewelry business, and they're going broke.
And they're worried silly about what Obama, well, they're not going broke, but just getting harder and harder and harder.
She was worried to death what was going to happen to Obama or the business if Obama was elected.
And I thought she had a cold.
I told her to go get some Zycam.
And she said, I don't have a cold.
So I said, well, I ended up offering her a car.
She thought I was teasing.
She went out.
She picked out the car.
The dealership let her drive it off before I had wired the money.
She had the car a day or two before I got the wiring instructions because they trusted my good credit and my good name.
And she also went out.
She followed my advice.
She went out.
She got some Zycam, the stuff that if you use it right, it will prevent your colds from taking hold.
It might stop it dead in its tracks if you use it soon enough.
If it doesn't stop it, it'll shorten the duration and lessen the symptoms.
It really is.
It works.
It's very simple.
Little cotton swabs.
You swab the inside of both nostrils every four hours, pinch it on like this, wait five seconds.
It's not expensive at all.
You got to have some in the office because the first moment you suspect that you're getting a cold is when you've got to use it.
And you can't give me the excuse.
Well, Russia's at home and I'm at work.
Get some at work.
Put some in the car.
I've got some everywhere, right, Brian?
Brian, it's his job to keep, well, not Brian's job, but many, many jobs.
But the medicine cabinet in here is stock.
Briefcase has it.
Office desks everywhere has it.
And the reason is it works.
Zycam works exactly as they promise you.
It will work and exactly as I suggest it'll work.
Will Democrats tinker with mutual funds and 401ks?
This is Reuters.
I heard that someplace.
I heard that they're going to do this, folks.
I heard it.
See, I heard myself said I love listening to myself talk because I love listening to people who are right.
It's inspiring.
That's why I like to listen to myself.
And this story from Reuters details everything we told you before the election about what's going to happen to your 40K, 401k via the Democrats running Congress.
And if you don't trust me, I'll tell you what Reuters says in a moment.
▲
Export Selection