All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 5, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:34
November 5, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Look at that MSNBC now with a countdown on the number of days till Obama takes the oath of office.
76 for those of you who are counting.
No, no, no, I'm in a fine mood.
I got my holiday-scented candles out, the pine and eucalyptus candles, and the amber and sweet orange candles out.
Yeah, the house smells great.
Getting ready to put the tree up.
Got some golf buddies coming in for a long golf weekend.
Later this month, family coming in for Thanksgiving.
A lot to look forward to.
Greetings.
Welcome back, Rush Limb, here on the Excellence, Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Somebody interrupted me there, folks, and I stopped myself to hear what they said.
And it sounded like that.
It was not something related to my brain.
Neurons did not.
Stop firing.
How must that have sounded?
Here I was on a roll, a brilliant show open.
And Rush Limb.
Well, we persevere.
In case you missed the close of the previous hour, Washington voters, this is the one thing that was a ballot initiative out there that conservatives did not triumph on because now we found a new way to die.
Voters approved Initiative 1000 in Washington on Tuesday, making Washington the second state to give terminally ill people the option of medically assisted suicide.
So Washington voters approve assisted suicide initiative, but it's not that big a loss because half the country voted for assisted suicide yesterday anyway.
Time magazine headlines, Joe Klein, Obama's victory ushers in a new America.
All these headlines, by the way, from Time magazine.
Barack Obama elected president with mandate for change.
What change?
We still, most people don't know.
And then there's this in the Democrat Senate could moderate its rule.
Everybody is so interested now in saying that we've elected a centrist guy.
Let's go to the audio soundbites.
If you thought that racism was over, think again.
Joe Scarborough's show today, Tavis Smiley of PBS.
I would take exception to that post-racial argument.
One of the things that's concerned to me is the media, the mainstream media, quite frankly, their embrace of this terminology, race transcendence and race neutral and post-racial.
And those of us who talk about racial disparities are somehow practicing the politics of grievance.
I don't get that.
Just because one African American ascends to the White House, let's celebrate it.
I revel in the moment.
But we do not yet live in a post-racial America.
Of course not.
I mean, whoever thought that was going to be the case anyway, it was I and I alone, ladies and gentlemen, who told you the race business is only going to be bigger after Obama wins.
The race business is only going to intensify.
I think racism is over.
Just because Obama wins, think again.
The race business is not about race.
Here's Tom Brokaw, and this is this morning on...
And by the way, we're working on the audio sound bites of this.
We got a caller coming up.
In fact, let's take the caller before we go to audio soundbite number two because we're working on the audio, what the caller heard.
This is Lonnie in Winston, Save of North Carolina.
Hi, Lonnie.
Great to have you here.
Mega Anti-Assisted Suicide Dittos, Rush.
Thank you very much, sir.
I was watching MSNBC earlier at Brokaw was talking to Andrea Mitchell, and he said that he had received every break in his life, even though he didn't deserve it.
And she said, oh, that's not true.
And he said, if he'd been one shade darker, he wouldn't have gotten those breaks.
I've never seen self-loathing so nakedly in the media.
You were right.
Wait a minute.
Wait, just a minute now to the elites in Washington.
You're in North Carolina and you're not supposed to know what the term self-loathing means.
I heard you say it.
Even thumbies can pick up you and care at other things, Rush.
You're exactly right, though.
Phil Donahue had self-loathing.
Let me give you an example of it, folks.
And liberals are the only ones that hate themselves.
Snurdley told me the funniest thing in the break.
He said last night he got a phone call from Diana Schneider, the editrix of the Limball Letter.
He said, James, James, look outside your window.
Republicans are rioting.
Republicans out at my house, at my house, when the guests left, guests left in waves.
The guests left about, I don't know, first wave left around midnight, and they came running back in.
You got to come out here.
You can hear the shouts and the cheers and whatever else is going on over in Riviera Beach.
So I didn't walk out there, but some people walked out there, and I said, Was it really?
Oh, no, it doesn't mireworks.
And I wish I'd have thought, no, that's Republicans rioting.
Phil Donahue, self-loathing.
I remember him saying one time that if he had been born, I guess I think he was born in San Diego.
And he said if he'd just been born 10 miles south, that he would have had an entirely different life, a horrible life, and so forth.
And he was feeling guilty about where he was born.
Self-loathing is basically guilt.
And he was feeling horrible about where he was born.
And I remember saying, Phil, you're looking at this the wrong way.
You need to be able to take the opportunities that were part of your life because of where you were born and start sharing them to people in Mexico and showing them how they're there.
Here, we've got soundbites 28 and 29 that Lonnie here is talking about.
Lonnie, hang on.
Let me grab the Q sheet back here for you.
Tritter, here is number 28.
Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, said to Tom Rocha, someone who got your start in Atlanta and in the South covering the civil rights movement, just on a personal note, the author of Boom, now out on paperback, who's seen many generations, some great, some not so great.
What does this election of Obama mean, Tom?
Well, it's very emotional for me in a lot of ways because race has been a big part of my journalistic career.
I grew up in South Dakota in working-class communities, a white kid who had all kinds of breaks along the way, even when I didn't deserve them, by the way.
Even when I stumbled.
I don't believe that.
No, even when I stumbled, as I did in college, people were willing to give me a second shot.
And I often said, if my skin had been one pigment darker, none of that would have happened for me.
And that has always made me very conscious of where race fits in in America.
So this is a very big deal.
My God.
White.
I knew I was going to love this day.
This whole administration's going to be a big, I told you so, Rush.
It is.
It is.
It's like I said, I hope you people in Ohio, I hope you Democrats, I hope you lose your coal business.
I hope he does bankrupt the coal business for you.
I hope you learn what you've done here.
Well, everybody's going to get to see socialism if he's unfiltered.
They'll get to see what socialism really is.
And I hope we can come back from it.
Oh, we'll come back from it.
Don't worry about that.
I got a prescription, a recipe for how we're going to come back from it.
But we got one more broker bite here, but this Andrew says, I don't believe you didn't deserve the breaks.
No, even when I stumbled, as I did in college, people were willing to give me a second shot.
If my skin had been one pigment darker, none of that would have happened.
He would not have gotten a second chance if his pigments, it was one, one darker skin was one pigment darker.
I mean, this is this self, self-loathing.
Self-loathing is just, you're right.
It's breathtaking to behold.
If Tom Brokaw had been one pigment darker, he'd have just been Ed Bradley.
He could have been president for crying out loud.
If he just would have one pigment darker, Ed Bradley could have been Tom Bradley.
Could have been Doug Wilder, could have been any number of people.
One pigment dart.
He's making it out here.
If he had been one pigment darker, he would have been total miserable failure.
Okay, here's the second one.
This is Brokaw adding to the previous bite of self-loathing.
The interesting part of it is he didn't run as somebody who said, I deserve to be elected because I'm a black man.
He didn't lead with his race.
Oh, man.
He was chosen in the final analysis because he seemed to be the best answer for solving these problems that are before us of the choices that we had.
Hold it a second.
You just said Friday night you don't know anything about him.
You just this is better than I had hoped for.
Golly, play this again.
Cue it up to the top.
Number two, go.
He didn't run as somebody who said, I deserve to be elected because I'm a black man.
He didn't lead with his race.
And he was chosen in the final analysis because he seemed to be the best answer for solving these problems that are before us of the choices that we had.
So I think it's a real statement about a maturing America when it comes to race.
His campaign was all about race.
You know, this is the dirty little secret.
His campaign was all about race.
That speech last night was all about race.
I wasn't going to say that.
I wasn't going to say that today.
But now I have an entree, and I can go through that speech for you, and I can show you fundamental change.
All of these things were oriented toward righting wrongs for a specific group of people of which he is a member.
It was all about race.
When I made that observation last night, everybody in my house agreed with me.
And not because they have to in order to stay.
They agreed with me because they agreed with me.
Didn't leave.
Chosen in the final analysis because he seemed to be the best answer for solving these problems.
Cookie, you got to get me the Charlie Rose bite.
You got it for after the break.
We're going to play these two back to back.
Lonnie, thanks for the heads up on this because frankly, we aren't watching TV here today.
God bless you, Russia.
God bless you.
Back right after this.
If Tom Brokaw were one pigment darker, he would be Charlie Gibson.
If Tom Brokaw were a couple pigments darker, he would be John Lewis.
And I can't understand what he says either.
Welcome back.
Rushland Boss celebrating the unity today here on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, by the way.
You noticed how they love McCain again today?
The drive-bys love McCain.
I got a couple notes from drive-by people this morning.
That concession speech of McCain, why that was the best speech if he'd have made his campaign, that speech, why, who knows?
It was his campaign.
His whole campaign was a concession speech.
But see, this is this, ladies and gentlemen, for you intellectual loyds on our side and for you smart people on our side, you know who you are.
All of you who urged that we go moderates and all of you who urged that we go out there and start looking at people as Walmart voters and Joe the Plumber voters and so forth, you got what you wanted.
Candidates are going to go to the middle, get Democrats, independents.
They love him again.
They love McCain today.
Have you ever noticed and thought why?
Little pop quiz.
Five, I'll give you five seconds to answer the question.
Why did I love McCain again today?
Five, four, three, two, one.
Because he lost.
They love McCain.
The Democrats and the drive-bys love McCain because he lost.
That's how you do it.
If you want the love of the Democrats and the liberals and the drive-bys, guarantee that your side loses.
And they'll think you're brilliant too.
All right, here's Tom Broco again this afternoon with Andrea Mitchell in between English, Washington.
The interesting part of it is he didn't run as somebody who said, I deserve to be elected because I'm a black man.
He didn't lead with his race.
And he was chosen in the final analysis because he seemed to be the best answer for solving these problems that are before us of the choices that we have.
Exactly right.
I think it's a real statement about a maturing America when it comes to race.
Okay.
So you heard that for our purposes here, the money quote there is, he was chosen in the final house because he aimed the best answer for solving these problems that are before us.
Seemed to be chosen because he seemed to be the best answer.
Here's Broke Off Friday Night with Charlie Rose.
I don't know what Barack Obama's worldview is.
No, I don't know how he really sees where China is.
We don't know a lot about Barack Obama and the universe of his thinking about foreign policy.
I don't really know.
And do we know anything about the people who are advising them?
You know, it's an interesting question.
He is principally known through his autobiography and through very aspirational speeches.
I don't know what books he's read.
What do we know about the heroes of Barack Obama?
There's a lot about him we don't know.
Yeah, but the final analysis he is chosen because he seemed to be the best answer for solving these problems.
These people are neurotic.
I refuse.
I refuse to allow these people to make me think I'm the oddball.
I refuse, my friends, to allow these people to make me think that I'm the one controversial, uneducated, and stupid.
This is nonsensical.
This is self-loathing.
This is gobbledygook blather designed to sound like it's the most deeply expressed compassion and thought, depth of thought that's ever been uttered on television.
All right, Nancy in St. Paul, Minnesota, welcome to the Rush Limbaugh Program.
Great to have you here.
Hi.
Hi.
Yes.
I was just going to say I was listening to the BBC this morning, and they were talking to the president man of Kenya, and he had said, oh, Obama, he's going to, we expect him to help us.
We expect him to do right by us and help us.
Well, you know what, Daniel?
They need to contact the old brother there in the hut and ask him how it's gone for him.
Well, and he also said all of Africa.
But I kind of had a strange hunch this summer when he went back there and he says, oh, it feels so good to be home.
And I thought, that was an odd remark considering that some Americans should kind of really be home in America.
Now, that's especially in the age of Aquarius.
That's very small thinking on your part.
Why can't an American be home in Kenya?
I'm sorry, what?
Why can't an American feel at home in Kenya?
That's very racist on your part, I'm not sure.
Because his family's there.
He says, here's my grandma and stuff.
And he fell home.
Well, I know, but I still think an American.
It was just a remark.
But all I'm just saying is this morning the man said, we expect.
He didn't say we hope.
He said we expect.
If Obama fell in a squirrel nest, he'd say it felt good to be home.
That's just the kind of politician he is.
No, I'm dismissing that.
I'm just saying what the president said this morning.
Oh, I'm sorry.
He said this morning on BBC, we expect Obama to help us, to do good by us, to give us, to be.
Not only he said, Kenya, Africa expects.
He didn't say we hope.
Well, look at this guy.
You're talking about the president of Kenya.
I believe so.
I thought you might have met President Bush.
That's why I've been talking about the president.
No, We're talking at the same time.
No, it was the president of Kenya.
And it was kind of hard to see what I thought.
The president of Kenya is not going to get any help from Obama.
But he says we expect it.
Well, but he may get help.
I mean, what Obama wants to raise.
Let me get serious for a moment here.
Obama wants to raise everybody's taxes.
He's got this global anti-poverty initiative he wants to run to the U.N.
And he wants to raise taxes on American citizens to help fund it.
And so the president of Kenya might end up getting help, not from Obama, but from the American people.
Like Obama hadn't helped his aunt Zatuti.
Obama hadn't helped the brother George Onyongo Hussein Obama living in the hut in Kenya.
Right, I know that.
Well.
But I just thought it was an odd remark when he said, we expect it.
He didn't say that, we hope.
He said, we expect it.
He used that phrase several times.
So it just kind of.
Well, what do you think those hordes in Grant Park last night expect?
I mean, we've got, we got, we haven't played the audio of this because, frankly, I don't know if it's a hoax or not, but there's all kinds of YouTube video out there with Obama supporters saying, vote Obama, he's going to pay my gas.
No, no, I heard that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
No.
Those aren't requests.
They expect, because, of course, you want to make everybody equal.
So the poor says, well, we're going to have all this paid because he's going to do it.
Yeah, no, yes.
We have 47 million Americans who don't pay taxes.
They have expectations.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, it's going to be an interesting time.
But I just, I just.
Look, and he got contributions from around the world.
I'm sure he got some contributions from Kenya.
When you donate to a political candidate, you do expect to get something back.
It's called payback.
And I'm sure he expects it.
The big question here, folks, is this.
Obama's the answer.
What we still don't know is what the hell's the question.
And we continue here to celebrate the unity, ladies and gentlemen, the Russian Block Program and the excellence in broadcasting network.
Interesting information here.
We've got some voter breakdowns on the same-sex marriage bans that passed in both California and in Florida.
Now, it is fascinating.
This is by Radley Bolco at Reason.com.
My policy disagreements with Obama aside.
Last night was, of course, an historic chapter in America's long and sordid history of race relations.
Unfortunately, another civil rights issue, gay marriage, went down to sweeping defeat.
In California, Proposition 8, the ban on gay marriage, actually failed among white voters, 51 to 49.
However, it was the 70% support from black voters that put the measure over the top.
70% of black voters in California voted against gay marriage in Florida.
They discriminated is exactly right.
That's why he calls it a civil rights issue.
Florida's ban on gay marriage would have passed among white voters 60 to 40, but in Florida, black voters approved a ban on gay marriage by a vote of 71 to 29.
So black voters in Florida discriminated against gays and lesbians, and black voters in California discriminated against gays and lesbians.
In Arizona, the exit polling data not yet complete, but they banned gay marriage in Arizona, 56% of the vote, 55% from white and Latino voters.
So it seems likely that blacks were more enthusiastic about banning gay marriage than other ethnicities in that state, too.
Well, you know, he said he's against gay marriage.
Obama said he's against gay marriage, but there was a caveat.
He then added he doesn't think tampering with the Constitution for things like civil rights is a good idea or some such thing.
He just hedged his bets.
He said one thing and said another.
But here's the irony.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is why I am your host.
The irony in helping achieve one civil rights milestone leads to the defeat of another.
Not laughing about it, but still.
Last night's historic black turnout helped perpetuate state-sanctioned discrimination against gay couples who want to marry.
What?
Against gay couples who wish to marry?
I didn't say state-sanctioned discrimination.
No, it's not.
It states what happened.
No, there's not wrong terminology.
What the hell happened out there?
Don't you find it ironic that on the night one great civil rights achievement took place, that very achievement led to the defeat of another?
Yes.
The well, they do.
I mean, the gay rights people think it's a civil rights issue.
They've been trading on the civil rights issue for the longest time, and they do.
So we've been told if they think it's a civil rights issue, we have to think it's a civil rights issue.
And so we'll talk about it in terms of civil rights issue for the express point of making a brilliant point, Senator Lee.
Stop nitpicking in there.
You just realize I have made a brilliant point.
Put your personal bias aside for a moment and recognize here the brilliance of the point made by the host.
I'm just saying we're celebrating unity here today on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
This is Paul in Augusta, Georgia.
Nice to have you on the EIB network.
Hello.
Thank you for paying for my call.
How long do you think it'll take Obama to say the situation that we were handed is much worse than we thought?
I'm just not going to be able to give you the tax cut.
I haven't even thought about it because it's a foregone conclusion.
You're asking me how long it will be.
Obama defines a tax cut a very strange way.
He says he's going to give 95% of Americans tax cuts, but they're like 35% of Americans who don't pay income taxes.
He's going to give them tax cuts.
How's that done?
He's going to essentially give people a welfare payment.
So I don't know that he's going to say that he can't do the tax.
He may say he can't cut taxes for as many people as he wants.
But the bottom line is, you're right.
Whatever he says, we are all going to get a tax increase.
Whether he does anything or not, 2010, gang, we're going back to Clinton tax rates.
That's it.
It's happening.
If he raises taxes before or after that, and he's going, the way you've got to understand the way liberals look at things.
Folks, do you understand a $700 billion bailout?
We have a $300 billion additional stimulus package that Reed and Pelosi want for infrastructure to build roads and to build bridges and to go out and hire workers to build the woods and to build the bridges.
Okay, $700, and the $700 billion stimulus package costs $850 because there's $150 billion of pork in it in order to get votes from people in an emergency.
So $850 plus three is, we're over now a trillion dollars in stimulus, and there's some things that happened before that.
Now, I guarantee the way liberals look at things, once this is all calculated, once they come to you, and you're right out there, Paul, there'll be this giant sob story press conference, all the steps that we had to take to protect the economy from the Bush years, from the Bush disaster.
We're going to have to do some major things that we didn't know because Bush kept all these secrets from us.
And we're going to hear about massive tax increases.
You understand?
See, this, I hope some of you people get your taxes raised.
We warned you.
We warned you.
I love, but Rush, the damage to the country.
I'm to a point here, I'm being facetious in a way.
But the whole, people tried to warn you what you're going to get.
You're going to get massive tax increases.
And it's not going to happen because of any Bush emergency.
It's not going to happen because of any budget short.
It's going to happen because they don't want you amassing wealth.
They want control.
The liberal Democrats want control over your life.
There are going to be tax increases.
I don't care what Obama said during the campaign.
Now, we tried to warn people here.
And I said earlier in the program in Snerdley and Dawn, they got mad at me because I said, I do get a lot of pleasure out of seeing smart people learn something.
Stupid people.
Stupid people learn.
When I see a stupid person's light go on, they learn something.
I love that.
And there were a lot of dumb things that people voted for, dumb reasons.
And there's a part of me that says, okay, you voted for it.
By golly, my gosh, I hope you get it.
You think you're going to get a tax cut?
And I know you're going to get a tax increase.
I can't wait to see your face when you get the tax increase.
But Rush, the damage it'll do to the country.
We lost that battle last night, folks.
Too late now.
Don't blame me.
Now, speaking of this whole tax cut business and the similarities to William Jefferson Blythe Clinton, Clinton was interviewed on DNC TV and he said, I'm going to quote him.
Well, you know, there's a lot of fundamental similarities here between circumstances that I had to inherit and Obama.
There's a lot of parallels with 1992 and the economy to 2008 and the economy.
So Obama, he's got to have similar challenges that I had.
Now, what this is, you have to understand Clinton.
This is Bill Clinton saying, hey, I had the same garbage.
Look what I did.
I had a roaring economy.
I went out there, raised taxes.
We had great, great numbers, low unemployment, everybody having prosperity.
He set that up because he knows full well that ain't happening with Obama.
So when it's all over, remember, Clinton's about Clinton.
And at the end of whatever period of time Obama serves, Clinton wants to be able to say, ah, you know, we had the same basic similarities.
I took office, he took office 08, I took office 92.
And you can check.
I mean, I handled it right away.
And look what happened to Obama.
He just blew it, blew it big time.
I tried to help, but of course, he didn't want to help from me.
And he certainly didn't want to hear anything from Hillary.
But there clearly was the right way to do this.
And mine was the right way.
That's what he's setting up here.
He's setting it up.
You think he's on Obama's team?
And by the way, since Rah Emmanuel has accepted, by the way, Rah Emanuel has accepted Chief of Stab Job.
I'm telling you, Rahm Emmanuel and Hillary are not friends.
And I don't know that Obama's doing this as a slap at Hillary.
I think he's primarily doing this because he wants a thug running his office and running his operation.
But the fact that Rahm Emmanuel and Hillary are not close, I mean, this is further distance.
This is why Rahm did not support Hillary, you know, in the primaries.
He was not on her carpet.
Well, quick timeout.
Be right back after this.
Well, I tell you, what a day this is for Marvin Kalb, the dean of CBS News Anchors Broadcasters now up there at the Kennedy School in Harvard, sitting atop the elitist news media mountain.
What a career achievement today.
He's on Fox right now.
Martha McCallum asking him what life is going to be like in the White House for Obama's kids.
What a career move.
What a question.
What a topic to get after all these years at the top of the news business.
For Marvin Kalb, here's Darcy in Dallas.
Darcy, nice to have you on the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hello.
Hello, and Dittos from Dallas.
Thank you.
I need a little bit of education.
I thought you might be the perfect person.
Fine.
I thought there would be enough people with common sense, so I wouldn't have to ask this.
But can we address this whole thing about my 401k and everybody else's going away?
Can you tell me, answer a question for me first?
Sure.
Do you know what's going to happen?
We don't know if it's going to happen, but do you know what the Democrat plan for your 401k is?
I believe it has something to do with circling the bowl.
Circling the bowl.
You mean like flush it?
Yes.
Okay, but serious, how much do you know about it?
You've just heard about it, or do you want me to repeat what you know to other people?
Please repeat, because like I said, since I knew I wasn't going to vote for Obama, I said I don't know what to do.
Let me give it to you very briefly.
So far, this is not Obama yet.
But this goes straight to my point about all of the idiots on our side and in the media expecting Pelosi and Reed and Obama and everybody to govern from the center.
The 401k was a central plan, a central tenet to get people to save for their own retirement in addition to Social Security.
It came into play during the Reagan years, and it was designed to supplement your own investment program, dollars that you have earned in a retirement plan that was independent of Social Security.
And of course, the way it works, your company offers you the 401k.
You can take a percentage of the gross, your gross pay every month and put that in your 401k.
It reduces your taxable income.
George Miller, who heads a House committee that deals with 401ks about a month ago, said we have to eliminate this tax subsidy.
The government is losing $80 billion.
We can't afford to lose this kind of money.
There are too many people that don't need this tax break anymore.
So what we're going to do, we're going to take away the whole notion that you get to deduct from your gross, whatever you contribute to your 401k.
The government needs that money.
So one of the big incentives for having a 401k came under assault.
Then that same committee, two weeks later, brought in an economist from the new school in New York called Teresa Gardelli Diller.
I'm having a trouble with her name and not on purpose.
But her idea is even worse, Darcy.
She wants to basically eliminate the 401k.
And the way she wants to do it, she wants to go to people who have a 401k who have seen its asset value plummet because of the market plunge.
So she wants to go back.
to August levels.
Everybody has a 401k.
We'll take you back and we'll give you, we'll restore.
The government will, we're just going to print some money here.
And we're going to restore your 401k to its August amount.
Then we're going to take it.
And we're going to take your 401k and we will put it in your social security account that the government is monitoring for you.
And we will invest every year 3% in government bonds.
We'll buy government bonds so that your 401k will grow at 3% every year adjusted for inflation.
And the most that you will be able to contribute to your 401k every year is 5% of what you earn.
And then when you retire, your 401k, and plus there's a $600 annual addition that she formulates here because she finds it inequitable.
Some people get a 39% tax deduction or 36% and some don't because of the various income tax rates that affect how much of a deduction you get.
But the bottom line is they'll take your 401k.
They put it in Social Security.
They'll give you 3% a year plus 5% of your gross added.
And then at the end, when you retire, you get one check, Social Security check added or whatever your 401k is.
The government takes over your 401k.
Not so much flushes it.
They just take it.
Like they're going to take some pension money.
Now, this is not centrist.
This is not moderate.
This is George Miller.
And this is the kind of thing that Reid and Pelosi will go for.
I don't know where Obama will stand on this, but the odds are that it'll sound attractive to him because these people are all about expanding government coffers.
And that's what they're going to do.
So that's what's ahead for people's 401ks if the Democrats get their way.
They may not, but that's what their planning is.
And it's a great indication of where we're headed.
And this was all known by people who listened to this program.
Drive-by Media didn't talk about this because they knew that it would be devastating.
Folks, we're getting into wintertime out there.
I don't know about where you live, but when it gets colder and you get up in the morning and turn on a hot water, it takes even longer than in the summertime.
You know why?
Because the pipes are frigid.
And depending on your hot water heater, depending on what a hot water heater is, it takes the water a little bit longer to get to the bathtub to the shower to wherever.
You can literally be standing there, especially if you're at some cheap person's house and they haven't upgraded a hot water heater in a long time.
You'd be standing there for a long time for it to get hot.
Need not happen at your house anymore because of the Renaissance tankless water heater.
Don't care what the temperature is outside.
Don't care what the temperature is where the Renaissance water heater is.
You turn it on, bamo, hot water right there.
And for as long as you want it, regardless who else is using a hot water utility in the house.
Save you a lot of money in operation because you're not heating up water you won't use like you are in a tank.
And the Renaissance tankless water heater won't explode on you like your tank heater might someday.
There's a website that explains how all this works.
It's very instructive.
It doesn't take up a lot of space either.
Well worth your time to investigate, especially if you're remodeling or building a house right now.
And I know some of you are.
We're still growing in this country.
Website is foreverhotwater.com.
All right, folks.
Tomorrow's program, more on the battle plan and the strategery involved in reestablishing our movement.
All that, plus much more.
Whatever happens between now and then will be top shelf.
▲
Export Selection