All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 31, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:41
October 31, 2008, Friday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Barack Obama's aunt, Aunt Zaitouni, living in a slum in Boston for five years.
Hey Boston Housing Authority Director says that the aunt, the Kenyan aunt, Aunt Zaitouni, is an exemplary resident.
Well, big whoop.
She lives in a slum for five years and nobody knew that she was related to Barrett.
Live from the Southern Command in sunny South Florida, it's Open Line Friday.
Telephone number 800-282-2882.
If you want to be on Open Line Friday, we go to the phones.
The program's all yours.
Monday through Thursday.
And it's a huge career risk, I take.
Most of the media would never do what I do on Friday, and that's turn over the content of the program to you.
You're lovable people, but you are rank amateurs.
You are not highly trained broadcast specialists, as of course am I. Nevertheless, on Friday, we go to the phones.
Content of the program is all yours.
I mentioned this earlier.
It just sickens me.
This poor old woman is living in her slum suite slum.
She'd been there for five years.
And the Boston Housing Authority director says, oh, she's just an exemplary resident.
And they didn't know that she was related to Obama.
Maybe now she'll get hot water since he is a special person, a VIP.
They got a VIP living in the slum in Boston.
I keep talking about this because I think it matters.
This guy's talking about how he's going to lift everybody out of poverty and he's going to do this and he's going to make everybody equal and so forth.
His brother lives in a hut in Kenya.
And his aunt about whom he's written, here, what's the sound bites?
Was it number two in which he talks about his aunt Zaituni?
Yeah, number one here, here, the aunt that lives for five years still living there in a slum in Boston.
Here's Obama reading from his book.
If Jane or Zaituni ever fell ill, if their companies ever closed or laid them off, there was no government safety net.
There was only family, next of kin, people burdened by similar hardship.
Now I was family, I reminded myself.
Now I had responsibilities.
Didn't do anything.
Didn't do diddly squat.
Apparently there was a safety net.
It's a housing, there's a housing project there in Boston.
I don't know.
We're wondering now if Aunt Zaitoumi is on LIHEAP, that's the heating assistance program, that Joe Kennedy in Massachusetts, along with, what's his name?
Delahunt, Bill Delahunt, have worked a deal with Hugo Chavez to get home heating oil in Boston.
I wonder if Aunt Zaitouni is on the LIHEAP program, getting heat from Venezuela.
I think it matters.
He's going to raise all you people up out of your wretched poverty.
His brother lives in a hut.
His aunt lives in a slum in Boston.
Back to the audio soundbites.
NBC Nightly News last night, Brian Williams asked Obama, you know, it's said on both sides of the issue.
If it's true, you're not going to call a future justice into the Oval Office, bring up the subject of a board.
How do you also avoid surprises?
How are you going to determine who to put on a court?
Number five.
Well, look, I think that what you can ask a judge is about their judicial philosophy.
And so my criteria, for example, would be if a justice tells me that they only believe in the strict letter of the Constitution, that means that they probably don't believe in a right to privacy that may not be perfectly enumerated in the Constitution, but, you know, that I think is there.
Okay, so basically, he said that his favorite justices are Souter and Breyer.
Those are the people he wants.
But look at this guy wants to overthrow the Constitution.
This guy wants the courts to redistribute wealth.
He wants to do everything he can to break down the capitalist system.
He's just said, look, if they believe in the strict letter of the Constitution, they're not my guys.
He's just admitted it, folks.
The Constitution is not for Barack Obama.
He's got to throw it out, got to find somebody to put in a court that will also throw out the Constitution.
Can't look at the original intent.
Moving on to Audio Soundbite 7, CNN John King.
This is on Anderson Cooper last night.
It's only five seconds.
Listen up.
We have Obama now already clinching the presidency if he keeps what he has right now.
Obama has clinched the presidency.
This is with their polling signed in states and the electoral map.
It's over.
He has clinched the presidency.
David Rodham Gergen was asked on the same show by Anderson Cooper, how confident are you, David Rodham Gergen, that Obama will win?
I think there's about a 90% chance, maybe higher.
There has been a little tightening, but the last 24 hours, it seemed to stabilize again.
John King has now moved a couple of states over in the last couple days, up to 291 on the electoral count.
Sorry, John King moved a couple states over.
It's over.
Oh, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Did the election happen last night?
I mean, I was listening to some music last night.
Did the election happen?
I didn't know about it.
Well, John King moved a couple states over.
It's nerdly.
David Rodham Gergen moved a couple states over.
It's over.
This is partly Obama illusion.
This is what they're doing.
Anybody watching, they're trying to...
Actually, I hope this backfires.
I hope this makes Obama's people more confident.
So, man, we don't even have to vote.
My God, CNN just moved a couple states over.
I can just see the Huffing Post blogs.
Hey, did you see it?
John King just moved a couple states over.
It's over.
We don't even have to go vote.
Screw early voting, screw voting, period.
I'm going to tell you something, folks.
If after all of this, all of this illusion, all of these polls that show massive landslides or pretty large margins of victory, if he loses, forget the riots.
The Democrat Party in general is just going to be going totally.
They're not going to know what happened to him.
Remember, after Kerry was leading in the exit polls and the exit polls proved to be false and faulty, at the end of the election, a bunch of Democrats were actually saying what happened.
The exit polls had him.
They wanted to count the exit polls.
They thought the exit polls were accurate.
The real votes were not.
And they wanted to find out where the fraud had been.
Now, the drive-bys, ladies and gentlemen, are using a New York Times poll to attack Sarah Palin in the final weekend.
Diane Sawyer talking with George Stanophilus on Good Morning America today.
There is a new poll out showing one more time that people are starting to think a little bit less of Governor Palin.
New York Times poll showing about 59% of voters say she's not qualified.
And it's clear across a range of polls now that the Palin choice has hurt John McCain with some of the voters he was targeting.
Some of those undecided women voters, maybe moderates up in places like the Philadelphia suburbs who they were hoping to attract was Sarah Palin.
The bottom line now is that while Joe Biden seems to have helped make people feel better about Barack Obama, the pick of Sarah Palin seems to have made them feel worse about John McCain.
It is breathtaking to see how 180 degrees wrong these people are and to witness their worldview being an alternative one that nobody else can recognize.
McCain would be nowhere were it not for Sarah Palin.
I have this New York Times story.
They're all talking about growing number of voters have concluded that Sarah Palin is not qualified, weighing down the Republican ticket.
McCain has been chipping away at Obama's lead with Palin.
It is Biden who is the drag, if there is a drag.
Palin is carrying this ticket.
And I'll tell you something else that Stenophilus was dead wrong about there, and that is women.
Women are outraged over how Palin has been treated by people like Stanophilus and the rest of the drive-by media.
Last night on Nightline, Cynthia McFadden also talked with Stanophilus.
Admit Stanophilus was up late last night.
He had to get up very early today to go on Good Morning America.
This could be part of the problem.
Cynthia McFadden said, was Sarah Palin a mistake?
Well, if John McCain wins on Tuesday, the short answer is no.
If he loses, that's the question I'd most like an honest answer to.
What an answer that is.
If he wins, she was no, not a problem at all.
She wasn't a mistake.
If he loses, that's the, well, you had the answer this morning.
You must have slept on it.
That was last night.
Never before in my histois, I mean, I've seen a biased media.
I've never seen a media so detached from the reality of the country that they are covering.
Now, let's go back to last night on World News tonight.
Charlie Gibson spoke with Stanophilos.
Stenophilos was everywhere.
He was on Good Morning America.
He was on Charlie Gibson.
He was on Nightline.
Charlie Gibson said, look, I want to talk about the early voting that we're seeing.
I have a question.
Certainly there's an advantage.
People get to register their choice early.
They avoid the crowds, but they don't see the whole campaign play out.
Now, by the way, avoiding the crowds.
Have you seen the lines of people standing in line in Florida to vote early?
They're longer than an election day.
I look to see if there's a place to early vote here, and there's not.
I'd have to go over to someplace on military trail.
I wouldn't go there if I had Larry with me.
Anyway, here's what Stanophilus said.
And that is the philosophical argument against it, that voters are voting with varying degrees of information and they may miss some last-minute news.
And Charlie, the last few competitive elections, we have seen some surprises going into the weekend before the election.
This year, because there are so many early voters and those battleground states are so saturated with ads and people seem to be so dug in that those last-minute surprises this year are likely to have less impact than ever.
Let me translate for you.
Even an October surprise cannot help McCain.
Even a Stenophilus, the October surprise has been this so-called manufactured economic plunge.
Remember how we needed this bailout?
Or we were finished?
We had to have it tomorrow.
Now cities are asking for money.
States are asking for money.
California, New York, the auto companies are asking for money.
And by the way, I'm going to take up for the auto companies on this.
And I've got some backup.
By the way, the guy named Steven Perlstein was on CNBC last night, and he said General Motors cars are much better made.
They're doing great.
They've made some changes.
But what this really is, this proposed bailout of the GM Chrysler merger is a union bailout.
It is a bailout that would enable General Motors to meet all the union requirements.
And this is an economist, by the way.
Steven Perlstein is kind of, he wrote a column in the Washington Post on Wednesday, but he's an economist extraordinaire, and he was on with Kudlow on the CNBC last night.
And he said, this is UAW bailout, a United Auto Workers bailout.
It's a reverse of free market capitalism.
And we had Jack Welch yesterday saying, you look at the three most troubled industries in America today, and you'll find that they're all unionized.
And he was talking about the dangers posed by Obama's Employee Free Choice Act, which is just the exact opposite.
One little poll before we go to the break.
Californians, I just do not, I can't believe this.
I will believe in divine intervention if this happens.
Californians appear poised to support the right to same-sex marriage when they go to the polls on Tuesday, but support for a ballot measure to ban the practice has increased.
In other words, the poll shows that Californians, if you read the whole story, are opposed to a gay marriage ban.
Wait a minute, I am misreading this.
Support the right to same-sex marriage.
However, support for a ballot measure to ban the practice.
Oh, it hasn't gone.
So it's two conflicting things here.
So a poll shows that the ballot measure is leading to oppose same-sex marriage.
That's a ballot measure in California opposing same-sex marriage passed, would that not be a shocker?
Especially in the era of the Messiah.
I know.
I'm waiting on a printer.
Hang on just a second.
All right.
Welcome back to Open Line Friday, Rush Limbos serving humanity simply by showing up.
One thing about Proposition 8.
You know, Obama is still spending money running television ads in California.
Now, California, you would think all this like New York, California's got to be in the bag for Obama, wouldn't you?
Well, it probably would be, except for one thing.
This Proposition 8 has people more fired up in California than the presidential race does.
And Obama's running ads out there in order to deal with the turnout, the Republican turnout coming out on Proposition 8.
Proposition 8 next Tuesday would change the California Constitution to eliminate the right for same-sex couples to get married.
It would limit marriage to male-female couples.
And the polling on Prop 8 is leading.
And this has got the Democrats in a tizzy.
They can't quite figure this out.
So Obama's running all kinds of ads out there to gin up turnout because all these Republicans showing up apparently to vote on Proposition 8.
Now, on October 29th, there was a story from the Santa Cruz Sentinel.
And the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsence, he went up to UC Santa Cruz to urge hundreds of students to vote against Prop 8.
And here's what Governor or Mayor Newsence said.
He said, if voters approve Proposition 8, which would divine marriage in California as the exclusive right of one man and one woman, Mayor Nuisance said that it could open the doors for those who oppose interracial marriage to place a proposition on the ballot further limiting who can legally wed.
It wasn't that long ago, he said, that women and minorities had few rights and it took hard-fought social movements to reverse them.
So he's trying to scare people in California.
Look, if you if you if Prop 8 passes, it ain't going to be long before these racist hicks ban interracial marriage as well, which of course is BS.
But this is how tight this thing is in the state of California.
And that's why Obama is still spending some money out there.
Now, as to John King, CNN, he just did a couple states for Obama last night.
He said, it's over.
Moved a couple states over.
Then Sinophilus says it's over.
Not even an October surprise could save John McCain.
And they're out there saying that Sarah Palin is a drag.
Do you remember how wrong all these people were in the primaries?
They said that Obama was going to win New Hampshire.
And Hillary did.
They were wrong.
They didn't think McCain had a chance in New Hampshire.
If you go back and remember, they thought McCain was toast in New Hampshire.
They were wrong there.
In 2004, Chuck Todd, the NBC political director today, said that John Kerry would win in a landslide.
And he's still the NBC political director today.
And he says the race is over now.
Now, these so-called reporters are wrong more often than they are right.
They were made to look like fools in 2002, in 2004, and this year they stand a good chance of looking like fools as well.
But all they do is report on themselves.
That's what media has become.
Media reports on itself.
John King will do a story on the CBS New York Times poll.
And then NBC will do a story on the CNN, whoever they poll with.
And then CBS will report the NBC Washington or Wall Street Journal poll.
And they'll all talk about the ABC Washington Post poll.
They do their work for each other.
They write their stories.
They do their on-air commentary for each other.
It's just that simple.
Ladies and gentlemen, we come back from the break in the New York Times.
This is so great.
The headline, wait till you hear the story.
Mortgage plan may aid many, but it might irk some others.
Wait till you hear this.
The New York Times.
Mortgage plan may aid many and irk others.
Get this bailout.
What a joke.
And you know what I'm enjoying?
I don't like we got the bailout.
I like so many people, including some on our side, were so insistent we needed to bail out.
We had to do it.
And now that they see what it's being used for, which we warned them, now they're acting shocked.
Conservatives acting shocked that government would lie about what they're going to do with money that they appropriate or print.
I don't know when it started, but this intellectual movement on the conservative side to believe in a big, interactive, compassionate government.
Somebody's got to get these people's heads together and knock sense into them.
I don't know when this happened.
I don't know how it happened.
It's not good.
So many conservatives thinking this, what do they phrase it as?
Activist, active executive with an active big government that we're in charge of that reaches out to certain people that we need to help, show that we have compassion to.
And then when we do that, and then the government starts making all these stupid moves and by the banks don't lend the money and they start rewarding the shareholders and themselves.
Whoa, this is not what we intended.
What did you think was going to happen?
So here we go.
As the Treasury Department prepares a $40 billion program to help delinquent homeowners avoid foreclosure, the Treasury Department confronts a difficult challenge, not making the plan too tempting to people like Todd Lawrence.
Todd Lawrence is an airline pilot, lives outside Norwich, Connecticut.
He has a traditional 30-year mortgage that he has no trouble paying every month.
But thanks to the plunging real estate market, he owes more on his house than it's worth, like millions of other people.
If the banks, which frequently lent irresponsibly and many homeowners who offered borrowed irresponsibly, are getting government assistance, Mr. Lawrence says that he believes that sober souls like himself are also do a break.
Why am I being punished for having bought a house I could afford?
I'm beginning to think I would have rocks in my head if I keep paying my mortgage.
This is a guy who is legal, legit, got a mortgage he can afford.
He sees everybody else being bailed.
I said, why the hell should I not get bailed out?
We could have all seen this coming.
Washington and Wall Street are frantically seeking to stabilize markets by curtailing the onslaught of foreclosures.
There are now at least four major plans to aid homeowners, but experts say it is difficult to design these programs in ways that reduce the indebtedness of the distressed without giving everybody else a reason to mail the keys back to their lenders, too.
No, you know, I want to use the NSS phrase.
No kidding, Sherlock.
No kidding.
When you start, ask a beat cop, when you start giving things away, all of a sudden people who don't even live where you're giving it away hear about it and show up.
I'll tell you what, tell you what I'm going to do.
I'm going to go out and I'm going to buy another mansion on the ocean.
There's one for sale.
I'm going to get a mortgage and not pay it.
But what's to stop people doing this?
Well, not that, but I mean, this guy's got a point.
Michael Criminger, special advisor for policy at the FDIC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, working with Treasury on the latest plan.
This is not about trying to create fairness.
The goal is to keep people in their houses.
Still, he acknowledged, that will surprise a lot of even our conservative intellectuals to think this is all about fairness.
A lot of people are angry because they feel some people are getting something they don't deserve.
They are.
And a whole hell of a lot more are going to start getting a lot they don't deserve.
But on the other end of the scale, if Obama's elected, we're all going to get the hoes.
We're going to get a lot of stuff we don't deserve, like tax increases.
This just infuriates me.
Everybody with a brain on our side used to know that this is exactly what's going to happen.
When you start bailing people out, Sarah Palin was on WMAL today, our affiliate in the nation's capital.
She was on Chris Plant this morning.
And he said to her, is the news media doing their job?
Are you getting a fair shake?
If they convince enough voters that that is negative campaigning for me to call Barack Obama out on his associations, then I don't know what the future of our country would be in terms of First Amendment rights and our ability to ask questions without fear of attacks by the mainstream media.
Right on the money, right on the money.
What she's basically saying here, you know, she went after Obama and his associations with Bill Ayers and Jeremiah Wright and immediately descends on her.
That's a distraction.
That's racism.
How dare you bring that up?
And they say, if the media is going to intimidate people from asking honest, open questions about people, then I don't know what the future of the First Amendment is going to be.
She's dead for people.
New York Times, you wishful thinking drive-buyers.
You think that she's a drag on the McCain ticket.
If there's a drag in the McCain, well, never mind.
The world faces a growing risk of conflict over the next 20 to 30 years amid an unprecedented transfer of wealth and power from West to East.
According to Michael McConnell, director of national intelligence, he predicted rising demand for scarce supplies of food and fuel, strategic competition over new technology, and the spread of weapons of mass destruction.
How can this be?
We are four days away from electing the Messiah.
Awaked.
I forgot Biden told us all this was going to happen.
Biden told us that the little squirrel was going to get tested and make the wrong move, but then beg for loyal support.
Growing risk of conflict over the next 20 to 30 years.
Unprecedented transfer of wealth of power from West to East.
We're the West.
We are the West.
Who are we transferring our power to?
Transfer of wealth and power from West to East?
Anyway, it's going to be bad out there, folks.
It's all you Obama supporters expecting utopia.
Get ready for the draft.
Wouldn't that be ironic?
Obama and heirs and his anti-Vietnam buddies reinstituting the draft.
Wouldn't that be ironic?
It'd be delicious.
It'd be ironic and delicious it can be, and they're probably going to have to, because who's going to want to volunteer and serve this guy in the military?
All right.
Mark Rancho, Santa Margarita in California.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hello.
Hi, Rush.
You know, during the debates, there was a question asked about free trade, and Columbia came up.
And I was really shocked by the answer that Obama gave why he was against the free trade treaty to Colombia.
He stated that Colombia was targeting labor leaders for assassination.
And my wife's Colombian, and I go to Columbia twice a year.
And the people, first of all, the people down there are very, very friendly to Americans.
They love Americans.
Look, we know this.
This is a great, great, great ally.
This free trade agreement, not being ratified by the Democrats, is nothing more than a SOP to United States unions.
Obama lied.
The government's not targeting union people down there, not assassinating them or any of that.
That's just another SOP to the American left and the unions because the unions, you know, they want some payback for all this money.
That's what the Freedom of Free Choice Act's all about.
But, you know, the stating about the targeting for the only people being targeted for assassination in Colombia are the FARC guerrillas who are supported by drug dealing and by Hugo Chavez.
And for that, for him to say that, he's either ignorant, which I doubt it, because I don't think Obama's ignorant, but that means he's supporting Hugo Chavez's look on the future of South America.
And that's a dangerous thing.
And the United States, the people of America have got to wake up and notice these little gaps that Obama throws out there.
Because it's a dangerous future for us.
We're doing our best out there trying to wake people up.
I think more people are awake than you know.
I think this is one of the reasons my gut's starting to give me some indications here.
There is so much fear of this guy.
You know, you can throw about labels.
You can call him a leftist.
You can call him a socialist.
You can call him a liberal.
You can call him an extremist.
What he is is an authoritarian.
And I'll tell you, folks, Fawada Jami, that great piece in the Wall Street Journal yesterday, Obama and the Crowds.
And he said, look at this, this has happened throughout the Arab land.
You'll have a Nasser, a Gamal Abdul Nasser, that'll come along, and the crowds go nuts thinking that he's the giant redeemer who has shown up.
Castro was the same thing.
And Castro and his revolution and get rid of Batista.
And the people fell for it, and they thought it was wonderful.
And because they just wanted J-hated Batista.
And look what they got.
They got abject poverty, political prisons.
They got an authoritarian.
This is the nature.
This is the history of people like Bill Ayers and others that Obama has associated with, his mentors.
I think that authoritarian, look at, he just dispatched three newspapers from the campaign plane because they endorsed McCain.
He's had Ohio political thugs use government computers to investigate a private citizen who didn't do anything.
Who are they to use government computers to investigate people?
Destroy, try to destroy a TV anchor in Orlando and her husband.
And of course, his brother lives in a hut in Kenya, a hut, sweet hut.
His aunt lives for five years in a slum in Boston.
Five years?
Five years?
He does nothing for either one of these two family members.
Sternly, I don't think that Charlie Rose or Tom Broca have the slightest idea what Obama's Columbia policy is.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
We're back on Open Line Friday.
Matt Drudge just posted recently here a story we had for yesterday about Erica Jong telling Italians that if Obama loses, it'll spark the second American Civil War.
Blood will run in the streets.
We had this story yesterday, but I wanted to remind you here what Erica Jong said.
She said, the record shows that voting machines in America are rigged.
See, yesterday, Jane Fonda sent me an email to tell me that she cried all night.
She cannot cure her ailing back for all the stress that has reduced her to a bundle of nerves.
Jane, stay off your back.
Try that.
Erica Jong also says that her back is suffering from spasms.
Both of you try staying off your backs.
So that works sometimes.
Not every time it's tried, but it does work sometimes.
What else do we have here?
Oh, oh, yeah.
Yesterday on NPR, Lawrence Eagleberger, a supporter of McCain, former Secretary of State, was asked about Sarah Palin.
I don't think at the moment she is prepared to take over the reins of the presidency.
Give her some time in the office, and I think the answer would be she will be adequate.
I do not understand these people on supposedly on our side.
The answer about Sarah Palin is, Senator Eagle or Secretary Eagleberger, you're trying to get your friend John McCain elected.
The answer is she's more qualified than Obama.
But of course, he might suffer cocktail party invitation declines.
So you've got to go along with the Beltway flow with the elitist flow, regardless what it is.
Hey, folks, I asked a question mere moments ago.
I asked a question about Zaituni Onyongo, the aunt of Barack Obama, five years in a Boston slum.
Just found out yesterday that a slum lord just found out that she's working and living there.
Calls her an exemplary resident.
Can you believe that?
After five years living in this hole, she's an exemplary resident.
And I ask a question.
Now that she's a VIP, do you think she'll get hot water in the slum?
I don't know, folks, whether she gets a hot water or not, but you can.
One thing I know is even if she gets hot water, it's going to come from a boiling pot on a stove.
It's not going to come from a water heater or a Renaille tankless water heater.
Foreverhotwater.com.
I'm almost tempted to see if I can, I don't know if you could put one in.
It would be fabulous to put in a Renaissance tankless water heater in the building where she lives to provide her hot water from the EIB network.
I send Joe the Plumber there to install it with Tito the Gardener, whoever he is.
We'll send a whole McCain team up there to put a Renaissance tankless water heater.
I don't know if you could do this.
It's a government building.
If you go in there, because you got to tear out the existing hot water heater, which might bring the building down.
You know, once you start tampering with it, really, folks, you'll save a lot of money with a Renaissance tankless water heater.
Brilliant technology.
It started in Japan.
They don't have much space over there for things like water heater.
The great thing is turn it on.
The water is there for as long as you use it and for as many devices in the house that you are using.
Renai.
Don't worry about the name of the spelling of Renai.
Just go to foreverhotwater.com and find out all about it, how much money you can save.
And think about maybe one of these things going in Zaituni Anyango's slum.
The aunt of Barack Obama.
Sarah Palin on fire in La Trobe, Pennsylvania today.
You shouldn't be working for government.
Your government should be working for you.
And if you share that commitment, and if you want to work hard, if you know what hard work feels like, and if you want to get ahead, and if you believe that America is the land of possibilities and you don't want your dreams dashed by the Obama tax plan increases, then Pennsylvania, we're asking for your vote.
Rattle, rattle, rattle.
And she continued as she was on fire.
Pennsylvania, the far-left wing of the Democrat Party, is preparing to take over the entire federal government.
Now, with Democrats in control of the House and the Senate, heaven forbid the White House.
And this isn't the mainstream policy, mainstream thinking in the Democrat Party.
It is far left.
Let's not entrust all the powers of the federal government to the one-party rule of Obama, Pelosi, and Reed.
There have been stories how she's going rogue.
I may believe them.
None of this stuff is stuff McCain would say.
She is on fire.
Joe the Plumber in Elyria, Ohio, at a McCain Road to Victory rally.
This is the guy that the Democrats used Ohio computers to investigate.
Joe the Plumber addressed the crowd, said this.
You know, get out there and vote.
It's very important.
You get out here, get the American people back in charge of our government.
Hold the politicians' feet to the fire when they mess up.
That's what we're out here to do, all right?
Smaller governments.
You know, as far as everyone else here, you know, that's a question to ask.
I'm going to go vote for a real American, John McCain.
Joe the Plumber makes it official as though there were any doubt, but Joe the Plumber, Joe Wurzelbacher, endorses, officially endorses Senator John McCain yesterday in Elyria, Ohio.
Remember, all these newspapers, many newspapers that have endorsed Obama are seeing their earnings plummet.
Layoffs are exceeding the national average by a gazillion percent.
The Washington Post, earnings down 86%.
The New York Times has been rated junk by Standard and Poor's.
The Los Angeles Times headed in the same direction.
It refuses to report the news.
Good riddance to the drive-by propaganda-driven media newspapers endorsing Obama.
Earnings plummet back after a bit.
Have a great weekend, folks.
We'll be in Indianapolis Sunday for the Patriots, Colts, and maybe Washington Monday night for Steelers Redskins.
I'll be back Monday, though.
See you then.
▲
Export Selection