All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 28, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
37:32
October 28, 2008, Tuesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
If Sir Rebob were back, Rush Limbaugh, this the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis, more to do than there is time to do it.
And we plug away telephone number 800-282-2882.
Email address Lrushbow at EIBNet.com.
Ladies and gentlemen, every Thanksgiving, there's a tradition on this program.
Every Thanksgiving I went, I go and grab my book.
The first book that I wrote, see I told you so.
Grand total of uh, well, counting hard back two and a half million sold, counting in the paperback, probably close to five million.
On page 70, there's a chapter on the real story of Thanksgiving.
Now, how many of you grew up, and how many of your children are growing up today being taught this?
The pilgrims arrived, and it was cold, and it was inhospitable in the new world, and they were ill-equipped to fend for themselves.
And they were bedraggled and they were tired and they were hungry and they were thirsty, and they were incapable of getting along.
And finally the Indians, who they would later massacre.
The Indians befriended the pilgrims and showed them about corn and maize, and created a big feast of turkey and dressing and cranberry sauce, and maybe even some cheese broccoli.
And they all sat down and they had Thanksgiving together, and it was the pilgrims thanking the Indians for saving their wretched lives.
And then, of course, after all of this mercy showed by the Indians, these pilgrims and their descendants went out and wiped them out and put them on reservations where they became alcoholics, and now they run casinos.
That, ladies and gentlemen, is a traditional story of Thanksgiving, is it not?
In fact, the pilgrims and their descendants not only brought all of these plagues, they brought syphilis.
They brought environmental destruction, racism, sexism, bigotry, and even brought homophobia.
Stole Manhattan from 24 bucks.
They cheated the Indians.
They cheated the Indians who had saved their lives by buying Manhattan for 24 bucks and some trinkets.
It was the first ever subprime loan, ladies and gentlemen.
The first ever subprime mortgage, 24 bucks.
The Indians got screwed royally.
This is what your kid is likely taught these days in the multicultural curricula in school.
Do you know the real story of Thanksgiving?
The pilgrims arrived, and they had to immediately find a way to make a living.
They had to find a way to support themselves.
And this is, by the way, all contained in William Bradford.
He was the first governor, if you will, of the of the colony.
Uh William Bradford, in his own writings, which I quote in my book, See I Told You So, William Bradford describes their first experiment.
They gave everybody a plot of land.
And everybody produced what they produced, and it went into a single store.
It went to a went into a communal store where everybody was then able to partake what they needed and what they wanted from what everybody else had produced.
Bradford found that this led to a bunch of slackers.
A bunch of slackers not producing anything.
They just sat around and waited for what the others in the colony produced.
It didn't work.
The first ever experiment with socialism on this country was undertaken by the pilgrims in the 1600s.
Bradford said this isn't going to work and got a different idea.
He gave everybody their own plot of land.
He assigned them, their own plot of land, and said, Whatever you produce here is yours.
You keep it.
And he writes of the miracle that happened after that.
The industriousness and the ambition that was utilized by the pilgrims.
That is when they became prosperous.
That is when they had bounty.
That is when they had more than they knew what to do with.
So they invited the Indians over.
And the whole notion of Thanksgiving was William Bradford and the original pilgrims thanking God for their blessings.
It was not thanking the Indians for saving their lives and showing them how to make broccoli with cheese for Thanksgiving.
They might have been grateful for the popcorn.
I'm sure they didn't have that over there in England, but nevertheless, that that's the story.
The first ever experiment with socialism failed, and liberals have been trying to reinstitute it ever since.
Read it.
On page 70, see I told you so, authored by me, the one and only L. Rush vote.
About Obama and this notion of referring, and by the way, it's not just Obama, there's an entire legal movement that is referring to the Constitution as a charter of negative rights.
A charter of negative rights.
To them the negative rights are that the government can't do enough.
It's negative because the government is limited.
Why change the name?
Why not just why doesn't Obama say the Bill of Rights is too limiting?
We have to, we have to open up the Bill of Rights because people don't want the Bill of Rights messed with.
But if you call the Constitution a charter of negative rights, and you have your buddy Bill Ayers working up a curricula for high schools and colleges, where kids are being taught that the Constitution is a charter of negative rights, they're going to make the assumption the Constitution is oppressive.
That the Constitution limits them.
So if you if you go out and you name something or call something a charter of negative rights, then you have permission to introduce positive rights.
Isn't positive better than negative?
Everybody always positive is better than negative.
So if you portray the Constitution as a charter of negative rights, then you give yourself permission to change out.
We want positive rights.
And and and the poor, uninformed, ill-educated, maleducated students go, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Positive rights, positive rights.
Well, what Obama wants to do, what he wants is an anti-bill of rights.
That's what he wants.
When he says there's nothing in there, the state or federal government what they can do to you.
And nothing, there's nothing in the Constitution what they can do to you.
Well, he says, What's in there is what they can't do to you.
But there's nothing in there but what they can do on your behalf.
So to him, the Constitution is very limiting.
He wants an anti-bill of rights, the things Obama wants to induce or introduce.
Um he wants to take from individual rights.
Killing babies would be an anti-bill of rights idea.
The fairness doctrine doctrine takes away free speech.
It is an anti-bill of rights item.
And why name something fair that's anti-free speech?
You take away an individual's right to bear arms is anti-bill of rights, but to Obama, that's a positive right.
A positive right granted to the government.
He wants the government to have soul power via the courts or however he can bring about, to limit your freedom.
Whereas the Constitution's purpose is to limit government's freedom.
A government entity looking at an individual's private information that is anti-bill of rights.
A charter of negative rights is demeaning and a deliberate attempt to destroy the Bill of Rights.
That's what Obama wants.
That's how he plans to get around uh his his uh his redistribution scheme, or plans to implement it.
I uh I should say, I'm gonna take a brief time out.
We'll get to your phone calls very quickly.
I want to do one thing first.
I was on Greta last night on Fox, and I want to play uh excerpts of the interview that I had on her program last night and follow it up with uh an interview by Kirby Wilbur out in Seattle of uh professor of economics, Theresa Gilarducci, who has introduced this 401k plan that would basically strip you of yours and uh and give it to the government.
She says I misinterpreted and misreported her idea.
I didn't.
All that coming up right after this.
By the way, sweetness and light.com, the blog has a whole bunch of quotes from the founding fathers on the whole concept of um anti-socialism that they all believed.
And by the way, well, we'll link to it at Rush Limbaugh.com later this afternoon.
Also, don't forget this.
You ought to go back and uh and find we should we should link to this too.
George Washington's first inaugural.
In the late 1700s.
The number of times God was mentioned by George Washington, our first president will stun you.
And it was a thank you to God for the U.S. Constitution.
George Washington's first inaugural was just powerful.
You compare, you compare any of the founding fathers to what you hear from Barack Obama or the Democrat Party platform.
Let me let me give you page nine of the Democrat Party platform.
The essence of what it means to be a patriot, not only to declare our love of this nation, but to show it by our deeds, our priorities, and the commitments we keep.
If we choose to change, just imagine what we can do.
What makes America grave has never been its perfection, but the belief it can be made better.
And that people who love this country can change it.
This is the country of Lincoln, Susan B. Anthony, Martin Luther King Jr., Caesar Chavez, and Rosa Parks.
People who had the audacity to believe that their country could be a better place and the courage to work to make it so.
That's page nine of the Democrat Party platform.
That's what Barack Obama means by our better history.
We're not fulfilling the promise of our better days.
This is what he's talking about.
You won't find the single name of a single founder in the Democrat Party platform.
Last night I appeared with uh with the Greta van Sustran on the Fox news channel.
First question.
Senator McCain is down a bit in almost every single poll.
What does he have to do to change that?
I'm not comfortable with these questions.
What does McCain have to do?
Because everybody's telling Senator McCain what to do, and he's got a campaign staff doing this.
But it seems to me that if people think the economy's bad and change equals a better economy.
And if the people are associating the Republican Party with the rotten economy because Bush is the president, he's a Republican, and it's incumbent upon this campaign to convince as many people as possible that the economic crisis we're all experiencing now is directly the fault of the Democrat Party and their cronies.
And the case can be made for that simply by saying if the Democrats could find a Republican on whom to blame this, they would have had that person up on Capitol Hill testifying for the past two months.
They would have done their best to destroy that person.
This was bought and paid for by the Democrat Party from Jimmy Carter forward to Bill Clinton, and it's Democrat cronies who covered up any investigation of what was going on in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
He's got to say that.
Greta then said, What about the media treatment of Governor Palin?
Fair or not?
This is what the Democrat Party has become.
The Democrat Party is not interested in debate.
The Democrat Party wants to destroy.
They want to destroy the credibility of opponents.
They want to shut them up.
They want to make sure they have no way to speak, no opportunity to speak, and when they do speak, they want to make sure they have no credibility.
I mean, this is as one-sided as I've ever seen a campaign, but it is what it is.
What amazes me is that the Republican Party thinks that in order to get people to elect a Republican president, we need moderates.
We need independence.
We're then told that Senator McCain cannot go partisan.
He cannot attack Democrats because that will offend independence.
That will offend moderates because they don't like partisanship.
Yet the moderates and independence, if McCain goes partisan, are going to be so mad they are going to run over to the most partisan, mean-spirited extremist political party in our lifetimes.
It doesn't make any sense.
What they're doing to Sarah Palin is outrageous.
The Democrat Party tried to destroy an average citizen, this Joe the Plumber guy.
They used official government computers in Ohio to track this guy down, find out who he is.
I had a caller to my show last week said they didn't find anything substantive on Joe the Plumber.
That caught me up short.
They didn't find anything sub who the hell are they to be looking for anything on Joe the Plumber?
Joe the Plumber can't raise anybody's taxes.
He was minding his own business.
Obama shows up, asking people to ask him questions.
Joe the plumber asked the question.
Obama revealed who he really is, and so Joe the Plumber has to be destroyed.
And the American people sit around and don't notice this, I just refuse to believe it.
What are you most admire or like about Senator McCain?
Senator McCain.
Well, you have to admire his heroism and you have to admire his uh his stictuativeness in in times of uh trouble, and he's actually, you know, he's uh he's taken his hits too from people he thought loved him.
He thought the media was his base at one point, and they've turned on him, and he still remains the the smiling warrior uh out there.
You know, as a human being, I have all kinds of admiration for Senator McCain, and I truly hope that his campaign pulls this out.
It's crucial.
He represents as the nominee of the Republican Party the stop sign to this advance toward a far left socialism.
That word's being bandied about too, and I was thinking, I heard Dick Morris talking about it tonight, and I got to thinking how many people even know what it is now who are under fifty, and how many people even think it's a bad thing?
Socialism is taught in the schools of and colleges is a good thing, and it's fair, it's from each according to his means and so forth.
It's but it's transfer of wealth it takes from the achievers, it punishes them, it gives to people who you know are not achieving things.
The Obama camp wants to fundamentally alter the way this country exists.
They want to change the founding of this country, destroy the capitalist system.
It is very mind extremely serious stuff.
She also asked me what I admired about Obama, and I said, Well, uh he says nothing better than anybody I have ever heard say nothing.
And he has mastered the art of charismatic demagoguery.
I also uh uh went back and in the next segment, I said I want to go back and I want to inform your audience, Greta, of something that I meant to say in the first question, what does McCain have to do?
And I went on to explain the Democrat Party plan to change your 401k.
Now there are two aspects of this.
George Miller, who runs a congressional committee, Democrat from California, came out with the first notion of just getting rid of your being able to deduct from your income your contribution to your 401k, that the the government's looting losing eighty billion dollars, and we can't afford to lose that.
So they want to take that away.
Then they had a hearing last week where a uh uh professor from the new school for social research, a professor of economics, Teresa Gillarducci.
She appeared and she said, I got a better plan.
What we want to do, we want to take your 401k at its August level before the crash, give you that equivalent and put it in your social security account, essentially.
And we're going to invest that money that we take from your retirement account at your 401k at its August level, and we're gonna buy government bonds with it, which will guarantee you three percent.
And then we will require that you put five percent of your pay into your 401k, although it's not yours anymore.
The government owns it, they will manage it, they will they will take care of it, and then when your retirement day comes, you'll get your social security check, and part of your check will be whatever your 401k monthly payout is after three percent of growth every year uh under the stewardship of the government.
So I mentioned this on Greta's show yesterday in Seattle, Kirby Wilbur had this exchange with her.
She said, Your plan as I understand it, uh would end the tax deferral status of 401ks.
Would I have one?
I put in a certain amount every month, and that's deducted from my growth, so I don't pay taxes on it until I pull it out when I retire, and so it would end that, and it would bring about a new government retirement plan.
Is that correct?
Not quite.
Um though Rush Limbaugh said that's what it was.
Whatever you have in your 401k now will keep its tax break.
So everybody who has their 401k plan will be grandfathered in.
But what I propose, instead of getting a tax deduction, like a decreasing your taxes by whatever your tax rate is.
So if you're at the very high income, your tax rate 39%, and if you're at the very low, you're at 15%, and 40 million people make so little they don't pay any taxes at all.
Instead of the deduction coming from your tax rate, so if you're hot whatever you put in your 401k, like a dollar, let's say a hundred dollars, um, you get back um thirty-nine cents or thirty-nine dollars if you get the high rate, fifteen dollars or fifteen cents if you're at the low rate or nothing if you're at the low rate.
I propose that we just transfer the deduction to a credit so that everybody gets six hundred dollars.
So I'm not taking away the tax break.
I'm actually um giving everybody a flat amount so that it's more equal.
Where am where am I wrong about this?
So what you're t sh everybody's gonna get talking about socialism, everybody's equal now.
Whether you've got a 39% tax rate and you can deduct that amount, you get that equivalent deduction.
This is all gobbledygook.
Basically, I'm just gonna get money six hundred bucks and you give me your IRA.
And I'm gonna buy government bonds with it at three percent a year.
I'll just give you six hundred bucks, and that's how we'll take care of this.
So Kirby says, well, no wait a there'd be a new plan where we all of us who bring in a paycheck, we'll put five percent of our income into the retirement plan administered by Social Security, uh, but guided by the pension folks who do Congress in the Federal Reserve.
Uh and all you're gonna guarantee at least a three percent return.
The government would supplement that with six hundred dollars annual payment to the plan.
The government would guarantee three percent plus inflation.
Okay, three percent okay, plus inflation.
So the bonds would be adjusted.
As I understand the six hundred dollars would be adjusted as well, right?
It would, it would.
Um what's amazing about this is that it's actually um doesn't cost the government anybody.
I'm just rearranging the tax breaks um that are available now for 401ks and spreading spreading the wealth.
Spreading the wealth.
She she her proposal now.
This is not Obama's yet.
This is a this is George Miller's idea.
This is the Democrats in Congress why I say McCain's got to tie Obama to these people.
But the Obama will go for this.
She's taking your 401k and giving you $600 a year and 3% interest, and the Social Security Administration administers it, and you can put 5% a year into it.
Now I want to go back.
We're gonna go phones here in mere moments, mere moments.
So those of you on hold, sit tight, hang in there, and be tough.
But I want to go back and play the last sound bite here with Teresa Gilladucci, who is a professor of economics at the new school for social research, and she testified before a House Committee, Democrat committee last week, on how she thinks the government should basically take your 401k uh and administer it, take it away from you.
But it's worse than that.
That's bad enough, but it is worse than that because she wants to she says spread the wealth around.
What that means is spread your wealth.
Your wealth.
So let's say you have a 401k, and I'm just gonna use an arbitrary number.
Your 401k right now has assets in it of let's say $50,000.
Somebody else has assets of $30,000.
She doesn't think that's fair to the person that has $30,000.
So rather than you get a tax, you know, subsidy based on your 39% tax bracket, she's gonna give you and the person with an IRA of $30,600 and call it even.
A year.
Plus invest the value of your IRA at 3%, adjusted for inflation, and then pay you back when you retire.
You'll get one check, it'll say Social Security Administration.
Your $401K is gone.
The max you can contribute to it under her plan every year would be five percent.
It's gone.
Caput.
Now, this is not Obama's plan.
I want to stress.
This is the Democrats in Congress.
This is what they want to do.
This I don't care if they're Obama or if they're George Miller, Barney Frank, liberals or liberals, socialists or socialists.
Now you listen to Teresa Gillarducci here again as Kirby Wilbur in Seattle tries to understand this.
So he says, you're gonna supplement this with this six hundred dollar annual payment that everybody with a 401k is gonna get.
The government would guarantee three percent plus inflation.
Okay, three percent okay, plus inflation.
So the bonds would be adjusted.
As I understand the six hundred dollars would be adjusted as well, right?
It would, it would.
Um what's amazing about this is that it's actually um doesn't cost the government anybody.
I'm just rearranging the tax breaks um that are available now for 401ks and spreading spreading the wealth.
Spreading your wealth.
But did you also notice the beautiful thing about the amazing thing is it doesn't cost the government any money.
It doesn't cost the precious government any money.
It's gonna cost you money.
And you here's here's the lure.
And this is folks, you gotta understand this.
Gosh, this so infuriates me.
This is because this imagine you're just a little guppy swimming around in your aquarium, and this woman throws in a little lure to try to feed you and get you hooked.
Your 401k is tanked.
She can wipe that out.
Her plan is for the government to restore the value of your 401k before the crash hit.
That's what's the sweetener.
That's what's supposed to suck you in.
That's what's supposed to get you to support this.
Wow.
Wow, we you mean my benevolent government that loves me is going to restore my 401k value?
Fine, fine.
And then they're going to inv invest it with bonds at 3% a year plus inflow.
Oh, that's one that's how they want you to give it up.
That's how they want.
They are the ones that came up with this plan.
You know, this is a 401k, SEPKIO's and so forth during the Reagan years.
They don't like it.
They do not like you having control over the creation of your own wealth, folks.
That's if you want to understand what redistribution is or socialism, whatever you want to call it.
It's very simple.
The Obamas, the world do not want you in control of your ability to amass wealth.
They don't want you to have control over that.
They want you to cede your wealth to them for restoring your 401k to its August levels, its values, and then 600 bucks a year.
Yeah, 3%.
Adjusted for inflation.
No growth.
Zippo growth, do you want us 3% adjusted for inflation, zero growth?
They're promising you that your 401k will stay even with inflation, but that's it.
This arrogance, it doesn't begin to describe it snerdily.
Of course they're arrogant.
I just want to do this, and I want to do and I want to take this tax, but I want to do that, and I want to, and here's what I want to do.
And I it it's amazing.
It doesn't cost the government any money.
Well, holy hell.
It doesn't cost the government any money.
What are we supposed to do?
Get down and pray to Washington every day, four times a day.
It doesn't cost Washington.
It's not Washington's money in the first place, Ms. Garducci.
Okay, to the phones, as I promised, we're gonna start in Stratford, Vermont.
Suzanne, nice to have you on the EIB network.
It's my pleasure, Rush.
Thanks for taking my call.
You bet.
Um what you're talking about today, I live every single day in Vermont.
We have a property tax system here that is socialist.
And basically how Vermont does it is they they separate us into gold towns, which are the rich towns, and non-gold towns.
And if you live in a gold town, which I do, your tax rate basically is double of everybody else, because they feel bad because the towns that aren't gold towns, their schools maybe are not as good.
So my property taxes have tripled in the last three years because of this gold town.
And it's the same socialist principles is that all right.
Well, let's take from the rich towns to give to the poor towns because their schools maybe are not doing as well.
Now I gotta tell you, there is a negative growth in Vermont.
People are leaving the state in droves.
We are right behind them.
We're we can't wait to get out of the state.
There are no jobs here because the jobs are saying we're not doing this, we're not paying these kind of taxes, we're not gonna be a party to this.
So there is no job creation, and they don't want jobs here.
I've I've actually had it out with some of my local legislatures, and I've asked them, what are you guys doing to get jobs in the state?
And they're like, nothing.
We don't want industry here.
So that's socialism.
There you go.
Wait, they don't want they don't want who there?
They don't want industry in Vermont?
They don't want industry, they don't want businesses.
So I said, so how are we supposed to pay these property taxes?
And he's like, Well, you know, I mean figure it out.
Maybe I can't believe they would admit this.
I mean, it they gotta have somebody producing the wealth before they can take it.
Well, ski areas, it's tourists, it's a lot of the uh recreation, that type of stuff.
But we just had a big fire in one of the plants here in Vermont, and the and the employer said, we're not rebuilding, it's not worth it to us.
But like I said, my property taxes have tripled.
I have friends of mine whose property taxes have tripled and quadrupled Because they live in Stowe Vermont, which is a ski area, and they're a gold town.
Are you saying gold G O L D?
Yes, G O L D. So they're a gold town, so they're a rich town.
Well, you know, we have that in Florida too.
They just don't tell us that we live in them.
No, they tell us to go to the gold.
Well, no, but I mean if I told you what happened to the property taxes I pay for where it went, you know, I l I live in Palm Beach.
I have to look, I mean, to be certain about this, but the vast majority of the property taxes I pay leave my community.
Right.
They don't even they don't even stay here.
They they go to all kinds of different places.
It's a it's it's a it's it's a mess.
It's as ooh but it is what it is, and it's it's uh they've we're Florida's trying to do something about this in uh number go ahead, Brian, go ahead and say it go ahead and say it.
These guys, any time I start talking about myself, Suzanne.
What see now Suzanne?
Here I am trying to relate to you and say that I can understand what you're talking about, and my insolent staff, whose contributions program are way overrated, now asking me, well, who cares how much money leaves your community?
Your community is so small, what all do you need it for?
Well, because why why should it leave your community and go to somebody else's community?
That's my whole point.
Why should it leave where I live?
Why why should we have exact why exactly right?
Why should it go to somebody else's community, Brian?
Why why should it do that?
You know, we need cops, we need fire departments, we need firemen, we need landscapers.
I mean, if you wanted to live in Gainesville, then you would live in Gainesville, right?
I know, I know.
Somebody has to come polish the gold that they paint on the curbs here.
But you know, we have a socialist, um, we have a socialist senator, Bernie Sanders, and you know, he has had a big impact in this state, and the state is socialist, and that's that's what we're seeing.
And if you look at the demographics in Vermont, there is a negative growth here.
People are leaving.
And like I said, I can't wait to get out of the state.
Where do you want to go?
Where do you want to move?
I want to go to the Carolinas, or I want to go to Kentucky or Tennessee, because the cost of living is half.
Is that waiting for a job transfer?
Carolina's Kentucky or Tennessee because the cost of living is half.
Correct.
You've already looked at that.
Compared to Vermont, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Compared to New England in general.
Um, I know, I know.
It's the same has been happening in Long Island, Massachusetts people are moving to New Hampshire.
Uh, we are mainly Democratic uh uh country up here, too.
I there's about five of us in my hometown of the Republicans, and my husband and I are two of the five, so hang in there.
Uh you know, don't no seriously.
If they if you want to get out of there, if you're getting to this point, do it.
Do it.
There's uh there there are places in the country you can go, but remember now if Obama wins wherever you go, they are going to find you.
They're gonna if they can use government computers to go after Joe the plumber, they can find you.
Do you know this this anchor babe in Orlando who embarrassed Biden?
They're going after her husband now on websites.
They're going after this woman's husband.
Oh, yeah.
I'll give you details coming up right after this.
Barbara West, the anchor in Orlando that asked Biden about socialism and Marxist policies and so forth, and he mocked her.
Now keep in mind the drive-by's never question each other.
Do they grill Andrea Mitchell about Alan Greenspan?
They do not.
Do they ask Campbell Brown about Dan Senor?
Do they ask Dan Senor about Campbell Brown?
They're all married to each other.
They asked Jay Carney about Claire Shipman.
They're married to each other.
This woman's husband is now being attacked.
Barbara West's husband being attacked because the Obama campaign went after the guy.
We have a media montage here to illustrate.
The anchor's husband, Wade West, has been a political strategist and has done work with Republicans.
Surely it's just a coincidence that her husband is a GOP media consultant.
You uh registered as a Republican.
Your husband is a Republican strategist.
Is that true?
Your husband did strategy work for the GOP.
Do you know that there are CNN reporters whose wives and husbands are on the staff of members of the Senate and House?
And they never question each other about this.
They never use it to discredit one another.
But here Is an anchorette in Orlando and they go after her.
This folks, do you understand how scary this is?
This is the Obama campaign.
You do something that embarrasses Obama or Biden, they're gonna go after you.
They'll go after your family.
They'll go after somebody to embarrass you to intimidate you to shut you up.
You know, I told a caller, I told a from from uh from uh Stratford, Vermont, I said, okay, you may go ahead and move.
Go ahead and move down there to North Carolina, Kentucky, Tennessee.
They're gonna find you.
They're gonna follow you.
I'm gonna talk to my buddies at LifeLock.
I'm gonna say you need to come up with even greater identity protection.
You people at LifeLock need to find out a way to hide us from the Obama government and from the Obama campaign.
It's not enough for Life Locke to protect us via our social security number and credit cards, and they do a great job of that.
People's identities being stolen all over the place.
Hackers getting into computer databases and so forth.
But for crying out loud, I'm gonna talk to them.
I'm gonna talk to LifeLock.
You guys got to come up with a way to keep us invisible to the coming Obama government.
We can move around the country and they can't find us.
Life lock does protect people's identity.
This this all scares me.
What is happening?
Going after Joe the Plumber and now this this anchor's uh husband.
Anyway, life lifelog.com, offer code rush.
Doesn't cost much, and you will rest easily.
You do not want your identity stolen.
Trust me, you do not want it.
By the way, we have an exclusive here.
We're pretty sure that this was buried, but Cookie dug it up.
You know, it's not I told people last night they couldn't believe it.
I didn't know that it happened again.
Biden has banned Obama and Biden have banned another TV station for inappropriate questions to Biden.
And we have some sound bites of it.
This was October 15th in Philadelphia.
Uh KYW TV's eyeball news at four.
The anchors are Angela Russell and Chris May.
They talked to Biden.
Russell says Obama talks about spreading the wealth.
I think this is the is this the 50th.
Yeah.
Talks about spreading the wealth around, and everybody does better that way.
This has been buried since the 15th.
Obama talks about spreading the wealth around her, but he does better that way.
Is that not, you know, being a little socialist?
I mean, this is what your accusers are saying here.
Oh, no, no, no, no.
What it is is about realizing what got us in this god-awful hole and that plumber in a god-awful hole.
It's been this continued response by McCain and by the president saying if you just give gigantic tax cuts to the wealthy, for example, people making average of 1.4 million dollars a year are going to get another $800, excuse me, $85 billion tax cut this year.
That tuck's cat should be going to the plumber.
But under Obama's proposal, though, he would be paying more, as would a lot of small businesses.
Absolutely.
Absolutely not.
Absolutely not.
Well, please explain that.
Absolutely not.
98% of the small businesses in Philadelphia and all of America make less than $250,000 a year.
Not one single penny in taxes will go up for anybody, small business or individual making less than $250,000 a year.
Now the anchor Angela Russell here, KYW TV, eyeball news for Philadelphia, October 15th is not back down.
She said, Well, I'll just note that according to the Small Business Administration and numerous small businesses are classified making under 4 million, so I think a lot of small businesses would be affected.
No, no, you're you're getting this mixed up with all due respect.
Their sales are over four million.
We say if you make under a hundred million, you're a small business.
But the actual profit, what you pay taxes on, ninety-eight percent of what the small businesses make, what they pay taxes on, are less than two hundred and fifty thousand dollars a year.
Yeah, right, Joe.
The Chris May, uh, KYW TV, eyeball news at four, October 15th says the Washington Times is reporting you paid more than two million dollars in campaign cash over the years to family members for campaign services that they've provided for you.
There's nothing illegal about it, Senator, but some people think it doesn't exactly pass a smell test.
Your response to the criticism of this practice of yours.
Well, first of all, two million dollars, they say I Paid family members?
Uh, in excess of two million dollars, in fact.
No, well, that's not true.
1.8 million dollars for media consulting to Joe Slade White and company.
That's not $50,000 in payments to your sister.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa.
Slow up here, nobody.
Joe Slade White is one of the leading Democratic consultants.
For the last eight years, my sister works for that company and pays a salary.
She is not a partner in that firm.
She doesn't own that firm.
That money's not going to her.
That money's going to a major, major Democratic consulting firm.
It's a ridiculous assertion coming right-wing Washington Times.
Another one not true.
Anyway, um, this only aired one time.
This whole interview only aired one time before the Obama campaign got it pulled from the KYW Eyeball News at 4 website.
And uh Cookie dug deep.
I mean, really, really, really dug deep out there, found a copy.
And uh, there's one more soundbite to this, but you basically get the drift.
Uh, this is unacceptable.
This is inappropriate to approach the vice president of the Messiah this way.
And so they intimidated KYW TV to pull this on the website.
That's the second time.
Well, actually, this was the first time.
The Orlando situation is the second time where the Obama campaign.
Hey, you know what you want to you want to get along with us after we're president, and you get rid of it.
4947.
Obama in the Gallup tracking poll today.
▲
Export Selection