Rush Limbaugh Program - September 23, 2008, Tuesday, Hour #3

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 23, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program

35:42

September 23, 2008, Tuesday, Hour #3

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, folks, great to have you here.
	Welcome back.
	As we are genuinely having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have here today on the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, I am L. Rushbow.
	Most listened to radio talk show in the country.
	Telephone number is 800-282-2882 and the email address L Rushbow at EIBNet.com.
	I'm going through one of the stacks here.
	I'm going to make sure I don't leave stuff on the table here today.
	They're just too much juicy stuff.
	Now remember, uh, ladies and gentlemen, uh, we shared with you in the last hour, Senator Biden.
	We do not have audio of this.
	He was in Virginia on Saturday.
	And he went off script.
	Now he told Katie Coreick last night that he's being very careful about what he says.
	Because he knows Republicans are going to be paying attention every word.
	They're ready to jump on every word he says, such as when he says Franklin Delano Roosevelt went on television in 1929 and told people about the Great Depression.
	There was no television in 29, Franklin Roosevelt wasn't the president Herbert Hoover was.
	Anyway, in this little rural place in Virginia, he decided off the cuff that he'd better get into gun control because he's talking to people out there that chew.
	And he said, Carrie went into someplace in Ohio or Indiana, Illinois, somewhere somewhere.
	Oh huh, is this where I'll get me a hunting license?
	They have this in person, this impression of people in rural areas that basically haze his deliverance.
	So Biden thought he would score some points by talking about gun control.
	And he said Barack Obama ain't taking my shotguns.
	So don't bite Ed Mullarkey.
	If if Obama tries to fool with my Beretta, he's got a problem.
	Well, this jogged Mr. Snerdley's memory.
	We went back to the audio archives, July 23rd, 2007, Charleston, South Carolina, during what we all remember, the CNN YouTube debate, where viewers sent in their questions, and the on the spot editors at CNN chose the ones that would be used.
	And I'm sure that CNN chose this one because they wanted to make Republican rural voters look like Hayseed Hicks.
	The viewer in this case, Jared Townsend, and his question to all the candidates.
	Tell me your position on gun control, as myself and other Americans really want to know if our babies are safe.
	And he held up his baby.
	This is my baby.
	This is a purchase under the 1994 gun ban.
	He held up his um his his his rifle.
	Please tell me your views.
	Thank you.
	Anderson Cooper said, Senator Biden, are you gonna be able to keep his baby safe, meaning his guns?
	If that's his baby, he needs help.
	I don't know that he's mentally qualified to own that gun.
	I'm the guy that originally wrote the assault weapons ban.
	Look, we should be working with law enforcement right now to make sure that we protect people against people who don't are not capable of knowing what to do with a gun because they're either mentally imbalanced and or because they have a criminal record.
	Okay, so Biden, guy holds up his gun, loves his gun.
	You're gonna protect my baby.
	This guy's insane.
	He's not mentally qualified to own the gun.
	If that's his baby needs help.
	Barack Obama ain't taking my shotgun, so don't buy that malarkey.
	If he tries to fool with my beretta, he's got a problem.
	Again, folks, a new operation chaos.
	It's called SOB, Save Our Biden, Operation Sling Blade.
	We need to keep this guy on the campaign.
	Now he's not the only guy that's lost it.
	Naomi Wolf, do you remember Naomi Wolf?
	She is this extreme wacko feminazi who got hold of Al Gore's wardrobe in 2000 and said Earth Colors.
	Earth colors.
	She has posted a statement about Sarah Palin on the Huffington Post.
	Let me give you just some highlights of this.
	Because Naomi Wolfe is one of those that Democrats turn to for policy advice on women's issues.
	Please understand what you're looking at when you look at Sarah Evita Palin.
	You are looking at the designated muse of the coming American police state.
	I realized early on with horror what I was seeing in Governor Palin, the continuation of the Rove Cheney cabal, but this time without restraints.
	I saw that she was even styled by the same skillful stylist, neutral lipstick, matte makeup, dark colors, who turned Catherine Harris from a small maul rat into a stateswoman and who styles all the women in the Bush orbit, but who does not bother to style Cindy McCain.
	She uses mafia tactics against critics.
	This is Naomi Wolf talking about Sarah Palin.
	The riot police wore the black SM gear of the Rovian fantasy life and carried the four foot batons cops carry in North Korea.
	All this is not John McCain's imagery or strategy.
	It's Carl Roves.
	In McCain Palin's America, citizens who are protesting are being charged as terrorists.
	This means that a violent war has been declared on American citizens.
	A well-known reporter leaked to me on background that St. Paul police had dressed as protesters and dressed in black, shades of the black shirts of 1920.
	She continued.
	You don't understand how Sarah Palin has driven these people whack.
	Here's the here's the thing.
	They don't know anybody like Sarah Palin.
	Nobody in the media, nobody is the liberal elite, knows anybody with five kids.
	They don't know anybody that shot a moose.
	They don't know anybody who owns a gun.
	They don't know anybody that loves God, celebrates God.
	They don't know anybody with a husband who can run snow machine races and race race dogs and so forth and work in a pipeline and wear a hard hat.
	They don't know anybody like her.
	They don't know anybody that has five kids.
	They don't know anybody that has a kid with Down syndrome.
	They don't know anybody like her.
	They think that people like her are so far away beneath them, and that there are so few people like Sarah Palin, they are totally, totally blown off their equilibrium here.
	But this gets even better, snurdly.
	I've barely scratched the surface of this post from Naomi Wolf.
	Under the coming Palin Rove police state, you will witness the plans now underway to bring Iraqi troops to patrol the streets of our nation.
	Under the Palin Rove police state, there will be no further true elections.
	Mark Crispin Miller has done sensational and underreported investigating to establish that, as I warned and named the GOP staffers on the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee have been.
	Under the Palin Rove police state, citizens will be targeted with state cyber terrorism.
	Bruce Fine of the American Freedom Agenda, former Reagan official, warned me three years ago that the Bush team went after a Republican who had crossed them through cyber stalking.
	They messed with his email.
	Really?
	They messed with his email?
	Hey, Naomi, you mean like the Obama campaign hacked into Sarah Palin's email?
	Is that the kind of thing that you're talking about, Naomi?
	She says, Am I trying to scare you?
	Yes, I am.
	I am trying to scare you to death and ask you to scare your Republican and independent friends most of all.
	How do you know when it is war on citizens?
	When there are mass arrests, journalists are jailed, the opposition is infiltrated, rights are stripped, and leaders start to ignore the rule of law.
	People's bank accounts are being tampered with.
	Wire transfers to banks vanish in midair.
	I personally keep opening bank accounts that are quickly corrupted by fraud.
	Money vanishes.
	Co-workers of mine have to keep opening new email accounts as old ones become infected.
	And most disturbingly to me personally is the mail tampering I've both heard of and experienced firsthand.
	My tax returns vanished from my mailbox.
	All my larger envelopes arrive ripped straight open, apparently by hand.
	When I show the postman, he says that's impossible.
	Horrifyingly to me is the impact on my family.
	My children's report cards are returned again and again, though perfectly addressed.
	Their invitations are turned back, and my daughter's many letters from camp vanished, all of them.
	I'm not telling you this because it's about my life.
	I'm telling you this because it's about your life, whoever you are, conservative or liberal, independent or evangelical.
	Your politics will not protect you in a police state.
	History shows that nothing protects you in a police state.
	This is not about my fear and anxiety.
	It's about what awaits you and everybody You love unless you see this for what it is.
	This is Naomi Wolf, literally rendered insane and ready for the man in a little white coat to come drag her away in a little yellow bus to the Meninger Clinic.
	Make no mistake, Sarah Ivita Palin is Rove and Cheney's cosmetic rebranding of their fascist push.
	She will help to establish a true and irreversible fear society in this once free, once proud nation.
	For God's sake, don't let her, don't let them.
	And this is not some kook fringe leftist at a kook fringe leftist blog.
	This is Naomi Wolf at the Huffington Post.
	Well, actually, that's a good point.
	There is very little is a bad example.
	Very little difference between a Cook Fringe blog and the Huffington Post, and there's obviously now no difference at all between an average insane lunatic poster at a fringe Democrat website and Naomi Wolf.
	By the way, folks, it's not just Obama with the gaff uh Biden with the gaffes.
	Obama is making a few of his own yesterday.
	He claimed to be a fiscal conservative.
	And the way the way he says he's a fiscal conservative is that he's going to eliminate 10% of government contractor payments, which is about 40 billion dollars.
	So he's trying now, but why is he out there trying to say he's a fiscal conservative?
	I thought hope and change and all this unbridled liberalism was what people wanted.
	People wanted bigger government.
	In fact, Obama's all upset.
	Where's where's the sound by?
	Where is I'm all over the place today.
	Uh let's see.
	Yeah, grab 18.
	Here's Obama.
	He's out there and he's trying to make himself out to be a fiscal conservative.
	Now he's on the Today Show with Matt O'Hauer.
	And uh and Matt O'Hauer said, Look, if I'm a voter and I'm trying to decide whether I want to vote for you or McCain, don't I have a right to know right now from you which of these things are going to get hit by the budget acts before I vote for you?
	Although we are potentially providing $700 billion in available money to the treasury.
	We don't anticipate that all that money gets spent right away, and we don't anticipate that all that money is lost.
	How we're going to structure that in budget terms is still has to be decided.
	Does that mean that I can do everything that I've called for in this campaign?
	Probably right away.
	Probably not.
	I think we're gonna have to phase it in.
	We're and a lot of it's gonna depend on what our tax revenues look like.
	Whoa, that's uh you're gonna be you're gonna be shocked if you start raising people's taxes, you're gonna have less revenue, sir.
	So uh the bailout could delay Obama's spending, and all of a sudden, uh, he's got to start talking about being a fiscal conservative.
	But the PS de resistance for Obama yesterday was he promised to put every piece of legislation that crosses his desk up on the internet so everybody can read it five days before he signs it.
	The only problem is Clinton started that back in the 90s.
	Obama promised to do what's already being done.
	Now do we ask ourselves, does he really not know this?
	I guess he hasn't been in the Senate long enough to know that they do this.
	That the Clinton administration started this whole process of legislation going up on the internet so everybody can look at it, whoever wants to, and he doesn't even know that.
	Or if he does and he's just pandering, who knows?
	But regardless, the uh the bloom has certainly come off of the Obama Rose.
	Let's go to the polling data.
	Over at the uh at WhizBang Pole.com, they've uh looked at some raw numbers from the latest Gallup poll.
	And it is skip the opening paragraphs about trolls.
	You dive into the numbers.
	If you look at the raw numbers, McCain is significantly ahead of Obama, and his support is steady or growing in all categories.
	Meanwhile, Obama is steady or falling in all categories.
	Yet, the most recent Gallup reported Obama up over McCain by two points.
	Why?
	The waiting of voters.
	Now listen to how this is done.
	Basically, a guesstimate about voter turnout has changed over at Gallup, now favoring Republicans during their convention, favoring Republicans during their convention, but now favoring the Democrats.
	All polling organizations wait the numbers.
	The question is how.
	Here's how waiting works, by the way.
	Back in the old days, it's not done this way anymore.
	But back in the old days, minority and and uh and foreign language radio stations, let's take Kansas City, for example.
	Uh I I worked there for ten years, and uh there were two or three black music radios.
	They were always given more weight in terms of of percentage of population in the market than actually was.
	They waited it for a host of political and and business reasons.
	But waiting, W E I G H T I N G basically means guessing.
	And you are assuming, for example, after the Republican convention, they assume that more Republicans are energized to turn out, so they put that in their polling data.
	That has now subsided, and for some reason, Gallup has decided to wait Democrats with more turnout.
	The question is how this is all done.
	Now, if that's fascinating to you, it gets even more fascinating at this point.
	Wizbang decided to re-weigh the numbers to match ratios established by exit polls, that is polls of voters exiting the voting booth in the past few presidential contests.
	So they went backwards.
	They actually looked at exit polls, and then they applied what they learned to the exit polls to their other mechanisms here, and that's how they waited Gallup's own poll.
	What they came up with was not Obama with a two-point lead.
	They came up with Obama 39, McCain 45.
	In the current poll, weighted with past presidential election turnout figures.
	Could they be right?
	If voter turnout doesn't change substantially, yeah, could be right.
	One hypothesis that uh uh they would add here, Richard Meneter writing this, Republican and Republican-leaning independents are now favoring McCain because they took his pick of Palin as a signal that he's gonna govern as a conservative, not a rhino.
	And that's why liberals hate Palin.
	Now, in addition to that, we add to this, as it's all dovetails here with the weighting of these polls, and how the um Republican and Republican-leaning independents are now favoring McCain.
	Barack Obama's support from backers of Hillary Rodham Clinton is stuck, smack where it was in June, according to a poll out yesterday.
	Sorry, poll out today.
	A stunning, who is it?
	Alan Fram and uh Trevor Thompson of AP writing this, a stunning lack of progress that is weakening Obama with members of the Democrat Party in a close presidential race.
	An AP Yahoo news poll shows that among adults who backed Hillary during their bitter primary campaign, 58% now support the Messiah.
	That's the same percentage who said so in June, when Clinton ended her bid and urged her backers to line up behind the Messiah.
	The poll shows that while Obama has gained ground among Clinton supporters, 69% view him favorably.
	That's up nine points in June.
	It has yet to translate into more of their support.
	In part, this is because their positive views of uh McCain have also improved during this period.
	That would be because of Sarah Palin.
	So not only Barry is not picking up the Hillary voters, which women, he's he's losing he's losing support in in other areas too, like in Wisconsin and in uh Ohio, he's down for.
	Uh now, this is the AP again, and this is their this is another interpretation of their AP Yahoo poll.
	Just 31% of Clinton supporters uh are still not backing Obama, say that they find him likable, which compares with 76% of Democrats overall and 65% of Clinton backers.
	Clinton's supporters think less of him in several other ways, too.
	Only 30% of Hillary backers are still not behind Obama.
	Find him inspiring.
	74% of Democrats, 62% of all Clinton supporters do.
	So he's in trouble here, backers.
	big time, ladies and this is the same poll, by the way, that found one third of Democrat rural blue-collar voters are racists and will not vote for the Messiah because he is black.
	Be right back.
	Stay with us.
	All right, we're going to get to more of your phone calls here in just a second, but you gotta hear this.
	The Philadelphia Daily News today, the uh the writer of this story, Dave Davies, when Democrat vice presidential candidate Joe Biden was greeting voters at a Northeast Philadelphia diner recently, he could not have expected what he heard when he slid into a corner booth next to Carolyn Bauer.
	Carolyn Bauer told a reporter that she told Biden that she would never ever vote for him or Obama.
	Quote, it'd be disgusting to get a man named Barack Obama as president of the United States.
	way.
	Her view is not unique.
	During the April 22nd primary, a woman emerging from a Newton Bucks County polling place said to a volunteer in an Obama t-shirt, you actually voted for buckwheat?
	Thank you.
	While both comments were atypical of the interactions at the diner in the polling place, Democrat leaders acknowledge there is discomfort among some white voters.
	Obama's name and his Arab African heritage are obstacles to the party's chances of capturing the White House.
	Party activists are finding.
	Philadelphia AFL CIO President Pat Iding.
	I'm hearing a lot of people saying he's too young, he's too inexperienced.
	What they're really saying is he is black.
	Not as a union guy, who's he talking to?
	Union guys.
	Traditional blue-collar white Democrat voters.
	So the Philadelphia Daily News is saying much of its readership is racist.
	Following in the footsteps of A.P. Yahoo, saying that one third of these kinds of people won't vote for Obama because he's black.
	Mayor Nutter, this would be the mayor of Philadelphia.
	Mayor Nutter said that although Philadelphians have been voting for African American mayoral candidates for two decades, no one's ever voted for a black candidate for president in a general election.
	And what people don't understand, they fear, or they're at least nervous about.
	While it's unclear how much Obama's race, name, and background will factor into the election, party leaders say that they know what to do.
	Focus on economic issues that favor Democrats.
	Get Obama into white communities, and make it clear that he has the enthusiastic support of Democrats.
	Trusted, you know what you need to do, you guys?
	You need to follow what Obama's doing in Virginia.
	He's running more and more commercials in Northern Virginia and Southern Virginia, all over the state, featuring the white side of his family.
	He is.
	Those are the people that are in those commercials.
	That apparently what you need to do in Philadelphia and in the suburbs of Philadelphia.
	But one other thing before I leave this.
	We need to uh focus more on economic issues.
	I saw something.
	This is how the conventional wisdom in the media works.
	It was either Saturday or Sunday.
	Days run together.
	I do show prep every day.
	I can't remember what it was, a political story, by my old buddy Jonathan Martin, who was very fair and the first out of the box with my response to Obama's Spanish language and it was full of lies and out-of-context quotes and so forth.
	He ran this piece that this economic collapse, a financial mess was just, I mean, it was gonna give Obama boost.
	It just does because Democrats just naturally benefit from economic decline.
	And of course, then McCain had been out there saying something different every day.
	But guess what?
	It hasn't translated into big support for Obama.
	None of the rules are working here.
	None of the conventional wisdom is working.
	The Democrats ought to be winning this by 20 points.
	The Republicans ought to be having no chance whatsoever in the House and the Senate, According to the conventional wisdom.
	And everything's in play.
	The Senate's in play, the House is in play, the White House clearly in play, Obama in big trouble.
	But they have these axioms, these narratives that a souring economy when a Republican president is in office will naturally lead.
	The problem is that they've been on this tack for seven years.
	They've been trying to run down the U.S. economy for seven years.
	People are tired of hearing it.
	So when the economy does, it's not even the economy yet.
	The economy's actually fine.
	Just when Wall Street has these crises happen, people's emotional reservoirs are filled.
	They're empty, rather.
	I mean, we've already been told we're in a recession for all these months and years when we haven't been in one.
	Michael Baron has a piece.
	The old economic rule doesn't work.
	Financial distress does not push voters to Democrats.
	And it's uh at Creator's syndicate, a lot of reasons here he gives.
	I I don't I don't have time to read the uh entire piece to you, but we'll link to it at rushlimbaug.com.
	Interestingly, post-convention polls show McCain's running at least as well as Bush in 2004 in Michigan and Ohio.
	Ohio was supposed to be impossible this year, folks, because of Republican corruption there.
	The governor Bob Ney with Jack Abramov, member of Congress.
	We're supposed to lose Iowa or Ohio by 20 points, and McCain's up four.
	So uh recent state tax increases have signally failed to bolster ailing economies in Michigan and Ohio.
	Gallup shows Democrats with only a three percentage point edge in the generic House vote, used to be double digits.
	Rasmussen shows Democrats ahead only five percentage points in party affiliation.
	The old rule that economic distress moves voters towards Democrats doesn't seem to be operating.
	They're not operating.
	And of course, there are reasons why.
	They're not operating.
	Many and varied reasons.
	And one is that uh there are other factors.
	You talk about weight, other factors weighing more on people's minds.
	Here's Boyd in uh Waynesboro, Pennsylvania.
	Boyd, thank you, El Mucho, for waiting.
	Welcome to the program.
	Hi, Rush, and thank you for uh taking my call, and uh it's a pleasure to talk with you, Rush.
	I wanted to make a point about the uh the bailout of 700 billion dollars, you know, that the uh they're having hearings about right now to bail out, you know, the uh Fannie Mae and the Freddie Mac and of course the insurance company AIG and I my point is uh I kind of dovetails into your first hour where you were kind of making a point about the
	common person having the mortgage and then end up you know losing it because they uh can't afford it.
	Well, my point is the uh mortgage bailout is to give the uh Fannie Mae and uh Freddie Mack more money to lend.
	Well, that to me seems like okay, they have more money to lend, but why wouldn't the uh government bail out the person, you know, the uh everyday person who has the mortgage problems, give them the money to pay their mortgages.
	Well, that's what Barney Frank wants to do.
	He wants to protect people that are uh foreclosed on so they can stay in their houses.
	It's called affordable housing, costs you nothing.
	Now look, that's not what Fannie that that's not what what you're you're I think you're slightly um misunderstanding what's on the table here.
	What's going on with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack is not trying to get them more money to lend because they're actually not lenders.
	What's happened is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack have bought and bought and bought worthless mortgages, mortgages from people who can't pay them back.
	Fannie Mae and Freddie Mack are holding assets that are worthless.
	They have been worthless for a long time.
	They started playing accounting games uh in late 1999 and the early 2000s to move these assets forward so that they could show that the asset column of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was going great guns, man, because they're these are companies ostensibly.
	They are not government agencies.
	That's always been a joke.
	But they're structured as companies and they sell stock and they're publicly traded.
	And the the CEO and his executive team wanted to pump up the asset values.
	They bought all these mortgages that end up being worthless.
	And right now, what this so-called bailout is to try to peg a market price for what these mortgages are.
	And by and after by the way, it's not just the mortgages.
	After they bought up the mortgages, they then used the the so-called value to go out and buy other assets.
	There are so many things involved in this.
	The derivatives, the uh the credit swaps.
	Folks, this is deep and it's entangled.
	And what it's happened here is that all of these people involved in Feddy Mac, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae started buying up worthless mortgages, worthless pieces of paper that the Clinton administration demanded people that the banks make loans on, started buying them up, falsifying asset value of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to pay themselves incredible salaries and bonuses.
	And it's just they've just they've they've piled worthless paper upon worthless paper upon worthless paper, trying to put off well into the future the day it all comes due.
	And it has.
	And in the process, you had Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns and all these other places that were buying into this whole scam too.
	They were buying and they were borrowing against what was worthless.
	Everybody was living on leveraged debt that you could not survive on.
	And what this bailout is about, if you want to call it a bailout, what the bailout is about is trying to pump enough liquidity, cash into all of this, so that these assets that are worthless have some kind of value.
	But that's tricky because right now the market value of them is zero.
	So if you try to set some sort of a value, it's going to be artificial.
	And then, let's talk about the $700 billion or $1 trillion.
	Let's say that they come up with the notion that these mortgages and the derivatives and all these things that are worthless right now, let's say that they are allowed to sell them at $0.70 on the dollar.
	Better than zero.
	And then after that happens, the market sets in, what what happens if the market says these things are only worth a dime?
	Well, then you're not just talking $700 billion, you're talking a lot more.
	So to counter that, some of the wizards are smart as saying, well, what if the market says they're worth a buck and a half instead of 70 cents, and taxpayers are going to really make out big?
	Which is one of the one of the most creative ways I've heard yet of people trying to sell it.
	But Fannie Mae, they're not getting more money to lend to you so that you can go out and buy a house.
	And don't worry, uh, there are a whole lot of people here, because it's an election year, trying to make sure that if you have a mortgage that you can't repay and you're still in your house, that you get to keep the house.
	It's an election year that you can count.
	Say, by the way, folks, a mortgage can never be worth more than 100, which is par.
	I was using a figure speech of the mortgage work a buck and a half, what happened.
	The way these things will be pegged to value is at an auction.
	They'll auction these these mortgages off.
	That'll establish what the market value is, but the nobody's going to know what that is until that uh process actually starts.
	Washington Post study finds major shift in abortion demographics.
	After I give you the details of this survey, I'll make a prediction to you.
	Or after you hear them.
	I don't think we will see another study like this for 38 more years or 40.
	Will you hear this?
	The face of women who have abortions has shifted significantly in the past 30 years, with relatively fewer white childless teenagers and more mothers of color in their 20s and 30s opting to terminate their pregnancies, According to a report being released today.
	In the first comprehensive analysis since 1974 of demographic characteristics of women who have abortions, researchers found the overall drop in the abortion rate has been marked by a dramatic shift, declining more among white women and teenagers than among black and Hispanic and older women.
	We've made the most important progress in reducing teen pregnancy and abortion rate rather than reducing unintended pregnancy in older women, said somebody here named Jones.
	Rachel Jones, senior research associate, the Alan Guttmacher Institute, which is Planned Parenthood.
	Uh so this this um they they they attribute the drop in teenage pregnancies to a combination of factors, including increased contraceptive use, more teenagers delaying sex, and state laws requiring parental concept.
	No!
	They said that wasn't possible.
	They said parental, non-notification, and so that was never gonna work.
	That would never work.
	Margaret Sanger would be proud.
	That's right, Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood will be proud.
	Her original idea was to abort the black race out of existence, and it looks like the trend is heading in that direction.
	That's why you'll not see another one of these surveys for another 30 years.
	Gotta hear this yesterday in Scranton, Pennsylvania.
	Senator McCain held a town hall meeting.
	An audience member has this exchange with Senator McCain.
	Wanted to take the opportunity to ask the media, where's your 30 investigators over in Chicago looking at heirs?
	We want the media to start doing their job and stop picking on little children because of their age and their pregnancies.
	Shame on you!
	Shame it all!
	That is a great question.
	She can take it.
	She can take it.
	That's what I want to show you.
	She can take it.
	And she's a reformer, and she will bring change, and she will bring reform, and that's what Americans want very badly today.
	Oh, man, this woman, this audience member, just lobs a softball at Senator McCain.
	Senator McCain decided to swing it and foul it off, I think, probably on purpose.
	But I this is great because I'm telling you folks, this woman, how many of you are saying the same thing, shouting at your TV?
	Where's the investigation of heirs?
	Where's 30 lawyers and reporters dumped into Chicago?
	Leave her children alone.
	Palin ripped Obama to shreds in media Pennsylvania last night.
	Our opponent, he likes to point the finger of blame, but tell me, has he ever lifted a finger to help?
	Has he ever reached out a reformer's hand to the other side of the aisle?
	In order to get others to say yes to change, has he ever told his own party no?
	When it comes to reform, he likes to say I will, but has he ever been able to say we did?
	Okay, that's Sarah Palin carrying.
	Now, this is a pretty good balancing act here.
	She's got to carry the McCain theme of walking across the aisle, and he's done it, and he's reform.
	And you know, it I really wish they would just let her be her and not mirror, make her mirror McCain.
	But she found a clever way to do it there, ripping Obama, exposing him as the hypocrite, the little unqualified men child that he is.
	A new operation chaos SOB, save our Biden Operation Sling Blade, working on a bumper sticker.
	No Joe, no justice.
	See you tomorrow, folks.
	Have a wonderful day.

▲