All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 16, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:05
January 16, 2008, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis, Rush Limbaugh the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
It's a real pleasure to be with you, and it's great to have you with us.
Telephone number, if you want to be on the program today, is 800-282-2882.
Our new email address is lrushbow at EIBnet.com.
One thing I've noticed out there, I'm watching all the pundits, and they all seem distressed now that we're not going to have a nominee anytime.
We're not going to have a frontrunner.
We don't have a really, well, national polls, I guess the national polls still give it to McCain.
Well, I guess Hillary on the Democrat side.
But they've got, no, they want, well, usually, you know, in the old days, it wasn't that long ago, presidential campaigns were just about now beginning.
The primary season was just about now beginning, rather than having states, four or five states down already.
But like the New York Times today, no GOP anchor in sight.
The convincing victory by Mitt Romney in the Michigan primary on Tuesday means three very different states have embraced three separate candidates in search of somebody who can lead the party into a tough election and beyond President Bush.
No GOP anchor in sight.
This is by Adam Nagurney.
Adam, there's a reason for that.
The GOP anchor is on the radio.
The GOP anchor is not in the campaign.
There is an anchor.
So anyway, we're all upset here.
We don't have a nominee.
We might not have a nominee for a while.
Super Tuesday might not give us a nominee.
Oh, woe is us.
They seem disappointed here.
And I would think they'd be excited by this.
And in terms of making the job, they do a little bit more exciting.
But of course, they've got their choices.
See, that isn't working out the way they've been predicting things.
McCain was supposed to win yesterday.
Romney was supposed to have announced that he's getting out of the race after New Hampshire.
And none of this is happening.
Huckabee was supposed to be the new Darling.
He was supposed to be racing through here, finishing first or second, a bunch of places.
Now they got Huckabee winning South Carolina, by the way.
That's the conventional wisdom.
But McCain says, no, it's going to be, it's going to be me.
I'm going to win South Carolina.
Even what happened in 2000, see?
Meanwhile, the Democrats, folks, this debate last night, I know, I can imagine that very few of you watched this, but I did.
Question from the official program observer.
Yes.
Well, illegal immigration is an issue in South Carolina.
In fact, I was laughing earlier.
In fact, good point, Mr. Program Observer, because now all of a sudden the issue is the economy.
That's the issue for the Republicans because we're on the verge of a recession.
Oh, no.
And that's the issue.
Of course, the economy has not been an issue.
They've been doing everything they can to say for the last eight years the economy's bad.
But it hasn't been.
They just wanted to make people believe it.
But now all of a sudden, when it's a presidential election year, guess what's front and center?
The economy.
And of course, I think a lot of Republicans are probably biting their nails.
Oh, no, the economy.
It's a horrible recession.
We're going to lose.
Oh, no.
We've got to get an economy off the table.
No, folks.
The fact that the economy is an issue, fine and dandy with me.
There is no better issue on which and in which to explain conservatism than the economy.
Taxes, immigration, health care, it's all related to the economy.
Immigration is a huge issue in South Carolina.
And I saw something funny.
I was going to comment on it earlier and I forgot.
It happened right after the program started, and I was well into other things in the monologue.
But there's a town hall.
I don't know if it's still going on.
It's probably not.
No, it was two hours ago.
But Lindsey Gramnesty was introducing McCain.
McCain was standing next to and behind Lindsey Gramnesty as Lindsey Gramnesty was warming up the crowd.
And I'm thinking this is South Carolina where they were really mad at Lindsey Gramnesty over immigration.
They really were mad at McCain.
And all these pre-election polls that say McCain's going to do well in South Carolina with this immigration issue as prominent as it is, particularly on the Republican side.
We'll just have to wait and see.
The South Carolina primary happens on two different days.
The Democrat election is one day and the Republican, I guess, five days later or vice versa.
But you cannot vote in both legally.
You can vote only in one of them, but they do separate it by a number of days.
So bring on the economy as an issue as far as I'm concerned.
Bring it on.
There's no issue that bothers me.
There's no issue that makes me afraid.
Bring on immigration.
Bring on health care.
Bring on the war in Iraq.
Bring on the war on terror.
Bring on the economy.
Bring it all on.
It's a perfect opportunity.
It's what presidential campaigns are all about.
It's a perfect opportunity to explain conservatism.
It's a perfect opportunity to properly identify the Clintons and the Obamas and the Edwardses.
There's not a dime's worth of difference policy-wise between either of them.
Let's go to the audio sound bites and let's listen to some of this syrup.
As you know, the uncivil war truce held in Las Vegas last night.
They're all singing kumbaya.
We have a montage of Senator Clinton, Senator Obama, and John Edwards all just getting a long lesson.
We're all family.
Hillary said it well.
John and Hillary have always been committed to racial equality.
Senator Clinton ran a good campaign.
I'm proud of the fact that we have a woman and an African-American.
I respect what Brock said.
The things that Senator Clinton just spoke about are correct.
Hillary's exactly right.
We got unity in the Democratic Party.
I think that what Brock said is what John and I also meant.
Senator Obama and I agree completely.
I agree with John.
I agree with her.
And Senator Obama.
We're all on the same page.
We're all going to make progress together.
I think that's fair.
I am glad I use equal.
I checked my blood sugar when this thing was over last night to make sure I hadn't had a diabetic attack.
Let's move on.
Brian Williams said to Senator Clinton, we needn't go back over all that's happened, except to say that this discussion before it was over involved Dr. King, President Johnson, even Sidney Poitier, several members of Congress, and a prominent African-American businessman supporting Senator Clinton, who made what seemed to be a reference to a party of Senator Obama's teenage past that the senator himself was written about in his autobiography.
The question to begin with here tonight, Senator Clinton, is, how did we get now?
How about that question?
You know, I love Brian Williams.
But he starts out by saying we needn't go back over all that's happened, and then he goes back over all that's happened without describing any of it.
So there was an effort for people who were watching who may not know what have gone on or what has gone on to not know the details of it.
But the question basically was, how did this race stuff come up?
You know, this is what Republicans are supposed to do.
We're Democrats.
This is what race stuff is not supposed to be.
It's tearing our party apart.
How did we get here?
Senator Obama and I agree completely that neither race nor gender should be a part of this campaign.
So I very much appreciate what Senator Obama and I did yesterday, which is that we both have exuberant and sometimes uncontrollable supporters, that we need to get this campaign where it should be.
You know, we're all family in the Democratic Party.
We are so different from the Republicans on all of these issues in every way that affects the future of the people that we care so much about.
So I think that it's appropriate on Dr. King's birthday, his actual birthday, to recognize that all of us are here as a result of what he did, all of the sacrifice, including giving his life, along with so many of the other icons that we honor.
So the question was, how do we get here?
The answer is we're not there.
Obama and I have gotten together.
We have conspired to blame our staffs.
Our staffs got too exuberant and they ran away with this.
But me and Obama, we understand fully what this is all about, and we're not going to go back there.
I don't know how Hillary can say she's where she is because of Dr. King.
I really don't know.
She's trying to get back on the good graces of people, though, because she's out there basically trash Dr. King by saying he was nothing but LBJ.
But as I pointed out, ladies and gentlemen, in a previous hour of this very program, if LBJ was the key to all this, how come there aren't any LBJ streets all over America?
How come there's no LBJ holiday?
You got a lot of Martin Luther King Boulevards, a lot of Martin Luther King Avenues, a lot of Martin Luther King schools.
You got a Martin Luther King national holiday.
Hillary Clinton did not get anywhere because of Dr. King.
She got everywhere because of Mr. Bill.
Uncle Bill, as he was appropriately named on this program yesterday, blaming the staff.
Too exuberant.
Very, very open.
Ladies and gentlemen, you know, when the staff here screws up, and it happens more than you'd know, I never blame the staff.
And you've heard me, because if, for example, in their exuberance, if they believe some hoax email that comes in and they give it to me as fact and I use it, it's ultimately my responsibility for not checking it first.
I'm not going to sit there and dump on the staff.
I take all the heat and I get all the money.
And so, but here they are blaming their staffs.
Nobody's going to convince me that there wasn't some meeting here to set this all up.
Okay, so next up, Brian Williams says, Senator Obama, next question.
Same question.
Hillary said it well.
We are right now, I think, at a defining moment in our history.
Yeah.
We've got a nation at war.
We're winning.
Our planet is in peril.
Nope.
And the economy is putting an enormous strain on working families all across the country.
Democrats are.
Race has always been an issue in our politics and in this country.
Well, the Democrats are.
One of the premises of my campaign, and I think of the Democratic Party, and I know that John and Hillary have always been committed to racial equality, is that we can't solve these challenges unless we can come together as a people.
And we're not resorting to the same or falling into the same traps of division that we have in the past.
Obama, you taken the high road here, and I admire you.
But they're trying to destroy you, my man.
Out there with your drug use and your drug selling and not doing a spade where they're trying to destroy you, Obama.
By the way, you think Hillary's committed to racial equality?
How come she's trying to stomp you into the dirt?
How come Mrs. Clinton's treating you is no different than any other Republican opponent that she might have?
She's trying to ruin you, pal.
And behind closed doors, I guarantee you, there's conversation going, who does this upstart think he is?
Racial equality.
Sister Sledge, we are family, and the bumper rotation happens to fit perfectly.
Back to the Democrat debate.
Just a second, but let's go get Rhonda from Edenton, North Carolina.
Been waiting a long time, and I appreciate that.
Hi, Rhonda.
Hi, Rush.
What an honor to talk to you.
Thank you very much.
Mega traditional Republican ditto.
I was calling about that call yesterday about the TV conservatives.
I was quite upset yesterday, but I must admit that Romney's victory toned me down quite a bit.
Anyway, this tunnel vision guy, right?
Was this a guy?
Because he said he was just so mad at the woman because she said if McCain or Huckabee were the candidate, she was not going to vote.
And he said, oh, and we'll have Clinton, Edwards, or Obama elected, and they might appoint judges.
And are they going to appoint, I think he said, a Scalio or a Ginsburg or a Stevens?
And I hate to tell him that Stevens was a Republican appointee, I believe.
But anyway, as far as I'm concerned, if I went out and voted for Huckabee or McCain, these compassionate conservatives, I would be voting for a Democrat.
And do you think McCain is going to appoint any judge that Kennedy is not going to put the seal of approval on?
I mean, this is crazy.
And Huckabee reminds me of Clinton.
I mean, he's got the instrument.
He's on the talk shows.
He's got the Hollywood entourage.
And he's constantly whining about Mitt Romney's money.
And he's also from Arkansas.
He's from Hope.
He's got the accent.
He's got it all.
He's got the entire kit.
Now, I would not vote for McCain or Huckabee, but I would not sit home.
What would you do?
I would start to energize.
We've got the internet.
We've got everything now.
I would try to energize our writing campaign if I had to.
I mean, I'm not going to stay here, talk to you, and apologize for being a supporter of Mitt Romney.
I love Mitt Romney.
You know why I love Mitt Romney?
Because he's good looking.
Well, his whole family is good looking.
But what I love was last night, he was like a little kid at Christmas.
He was not condescending.
He didn't act as if he was about to be crowned.
He wanted to bring everybody with him.
And he's got it all because he's got the business degree and he understands the law because he has a law degree too.
But you are the second woman who is called today swooning over Mitt Romney.
I adore that man because he is a good, decent man.
Do you see the way his wife looks at him?
Do you see the respect and the enjoyment that his children get out of being around him?
I see all that.
People are so jealous of this man, not to mention that they're scared to death and they have a hatred of Mormons.
I got to tell you that.
I don't understand.
If this man is evil and he's dangerous, would you please show me the evidence?
Right, yeah.
You know, you remind me of something.
I saw somebody sent me a list of things.
It was one of his emails that's going around, and somebody sent me A list of things that are without question true, but that you don't know it.
Like right now, somebody you don't even know is thinking about you.
Or right now, somebody that you don't know loves you, loves you to death.
It was all this kind of thing.
And one of the items on the list was, and I really got to thinking about this.
One of the items on the list was: if somebody really hates you, what it means is they wish they were you.
Amen.
You believe it?
You believe that?
I believe it 100%.
And you know what?
The fact that the media doesn't want to follow Romney is the very reason why I want to follow him.
Who cares if they approve?
Well, you know, this is one thing the drive-bys are not going to learn.
They will not learn.
They're going to do everything they can to try to shape your opinion without realizing they are driving you right the opposite direction they want you to go.
It's a fascinating question, though, these people that say that they aren't going to vote if Huckabee or McCain get the nomination.
Now, we haven't discussed this because the time hasn't really been right, but lurking out there is the mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg.
I can't tell you.
I think I mentioned this once, I play golf at certain places in the Northeast or play golf placed down here where there are a lot of members who summer in the Northeast.
And they love the guy.
And these are Republicans.
What do you think about Bloomberg?
I think about Bloomberg.
They see Bloomberg.
These guys are all business types.
DC Bloomberg and the Bloomberg Network and his $13 billion wealth.
They see somebody that, I mean, that's cool.
The guy has that much business savvy.
Anyway, he's lurking out there as a potential third-party candidate.
He's out there doing polls to find out if this person's a Democrat nominee, if this person's a Republican nominee, do I get in?
And I'll guarantee you, if Huckabee is our nominee, he gets in.
He's going to realize that there are a whole lot more Republican votes he might be able to get if Huckabee is the nominee.
McCain, I don't think he'd step on.
And then the question becomes: if a guy like Bloomberg gets in, does he hurt Hillary or the Republican more?
And there's no consensus on that.
Back here in just a second.
Well, I just read something attributed to David Brooks of the New York Times.
It was on a blog, so I don't know if it's actually true.
But he quoted me from yesterday's program in which I said, folks, I was going to tell you something.
It was in response to the guy who called and was upset about people saying they're not going to vote if Huckabee or McCain get the nomination.
And I said to the guy, look, you better understand something.
If Huckabee and McCain get the nomination, there's a good chance his party's finished.
It's going to be over and done with as we know it.
And it's going to get redefined.
It's going to be built back up from practically scratch.
It's going to be devastating.
So this is quoted in this blog.
Say, well, if that's, then that's the end of Romney.
I mean, that's the end of McCain.
They're all upset.
And Rush and his mimics are now out trying to destroy the Republican Party modernizers like McCain and Huckabee and Newt Gingrich.
I am personally trying to destroy the party's modernizers.
I don't know what you want to call these people.
Now, it's attributed to Brooks, but I don't know if it's true.
It's some blog post by a guy named Ezra Klein, who I don't know.
And don't interpret this as a criticism of anybody.
I just think this is fascinating.
It is literally fascinating to hear that people who are not conservatives are or who have abandoned a lot of their conservatism are now the party modernizers.
Baby, if that doesn't tell you what trouble we're in, nothing will.
If that's what these guys who are not conservatives, that's how they're perceived, modernizing the party.
And of course, these are drive-by media types writing this stuff.
And they're all depressed now because, you know, McCain was supposed to win Michigan and he didn't.
And Romney did.
And this guy that posted this block said, I don't see, I just don't see how Romney is denied this now.
If that's what Limbaugh thinks, modernizing.
Modernizers?
I can't tell you how that offends me on so many levels.
This term progressive to describe liberals, which is a big misnomer.
If anything needs modernizing, it's the Democrat Party.
How old is their playbook?
They don't have one new page in their playbook since I've been alive.
And they keep going back to that same old playbook and old pages, and we working the same old dishonest tricks.
Modernizing.
We need to modernize by going more socialist.
We need to modernize by believing that government's the answer.
That's how you modernize the Republican Party?
No thanks, folks.
I am happy.
I am happy to be the source of scorn.
I am happy to be labeled and targeted as the guy who's targeting the modernizers of the Republican Party.
Speaking, do you remember, we came up with a term here.
We've had the gender gap.
What are gaps if we had?
We've had the minority gap, with the gender gap.
We had a NASCAR gap, but we also, we invented a term, the arousal gap.
And that was, you know, all these lib Democrats and a drive-by women reporters just swooning over Bill Clinton.
Why not me, they would ask.
And we get these stories about the power crackling in his genes and so forth.
So we had an arousal gap problem.
Do you realize I don't know, ladies and gentlemen, if I can extrapolate here from two calls, we've had two women today just simply going bonkers over Mitt Romney.
Now, I don't know if they are part of the Romney organization.
I'm not trying to castigate them here.
You just don't know.
And I didn't ask them.
But I'm just going to assume here they're just ardent, just pumped up Romney supporters.
And if Romney gets the nomination and all of these, if there are indeed a lot of these kinds of women out there, because they look at Romney and he's a good-looking guy, they see the family.
And it's a wholesome, really good-looking family, there's a lot of things to recommend it in terms if you look at what women look at versus men and the political candidates and so forth.
Can you imagine the arousal gap being on the Democrat side?
Well, here's the difference.
There's a big difference with the Clinton women and Romney women.
The Romney women know they don't have a chance of sleeping with him, but they don't want to.
The Clinton women all wanted to sleep with a guy.
Remember Nina Burley, Time Magazine reporter read?
She said, I would personally give Bill Clinton oral sex for saving abortion.
Oh, they were all over.
You could see them swoon in the press conferences.
So if the arousal gap ends up, especially if Hillary's their nominee, the arousal gap.
And can you imagine, can you imagine the drive-bys and the Democrats going nuts if there is a huge amount of women in this country who are going to swoon over Romney the way these two who called here today swooned over him?
Whoa, that's going to be fun to watch if that all transpires.
The Arousal Gap 2.
Jean in Harvard, Illinois.
I'm glad you waited.
Welcome to the Rush Limbaugh Program.
Hi, Rush.
Hi.
Thanks for taking my call.
I've been listening to you for just about forever.
I first heard you in the barbershop when I was there with one of my kids.
That was before you said that you endorsed Clinton.
Oh, that's good.
That's a long time.
So that's a little bit before 1992.
Yeah.
Anyway, I'm 54 years old.
I got married in 74, got my Bachelor of Science in Nursing in 75, and I worked in OB until I caught it.
And that was early in the legal abortion era.
Wait, You worked at OB?
I worked in obstetrics.
Oh, and they, and, yeah, not in abortions, but they did some on my floor.
I see.
I got you.
Okay.
Okay.
I'm calling because of those population controllers that are saying that the only reason people have kids is because they don't have access to abortion.
Or contraception.
Or contraception.
Now, I want you to know that I've had, since then, my husband and I have had 10 lovely children.
They're aged 31 to 9.
And we have, and then when I stopped having kids, we started having grandkids.
We have six grandkids ages 18.
Wait, wait, wait, just a second.
I need to get my arms around this.
You have 10 kids.
The oldest is 31.
The youngest is 9.
Yes.
That means, I'm assuming for most of these 31 years, you have had an infant in your house.
Oh, yes.
How in the world have you done that?
I mean...
We enjoyed it.
We wanted these children.
We would have had more if we could.
And we know all about contraception, and we've rejected it.
And these population controllers, they go and they, no matter what the demographics are of a country, they say, you need to reduce your population.
They want contraception and die in Africa.
They're dying of AIDS.
And they say, well, you need more abortion and contraception.
You know, that is an interesting point about this.
When I did these numbers in the first segment today, I forgot to mention that all these environmentalist wackos are out there.
They are trying to suppress population to save the planet and so forth.
And that probably is one of the reasons why they're upset about the U.S. birth rate increasing.
Well, this Burby baby boom is wonderful.
Now, these kids that are having kids now, their parents are like my age.
And they've been, you know, got tricked into sexual revolution.
This is a personal question.
You don't want to have to answer this.
You don't have to.
Okay.
But how old were you when your youngest child, a nine-year-old, was born?
45.
45?
I'm 54 now.
She's nine.
Well, that's right.
You mentioned that so simple math, I could have discovered this without asking.
So 45 years old when you had your youngest child.
I had one at 40, one at 42, and one at 45.
So, you know, I mean, you know, I started, I didn't have my first child until I was 23.
Yeah.
You got started late and you kept going.
Yeah.
But, you know, these kids that are having kids now, they've seen what happened with small families.
You know, they don't have a whole lot of brothers and sisters, a lot of them.
And they want to have children because they finally figured out that contraceptive sex is a lie and that the purpose of sex is having children.
And I support them in that.
You know, that's a good thing.
And my kids are all giggling in the background.
Well, I was going to say, how many of them still live at home?
Right now, four.
I have three of them in the car with me, and the fourth one's in high school.
I homeschool the youngest three.
Oh, man.
This is a heartwarming and wonderful story.
You sound genuinely happy.
I am.
You know, I mean, you know, it's hard work, but what's life if it's not hard work?
And I'm doing what I want to do.
Well, then that's fine.
You know, that is absolutely.
I think you're also doing as I doing what I was born to do.
You are doing what you were born to do.
Ha, how are you?
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, Cutting Edge, Societal Evolution to Dallas.
This is Richard.
Nice to have you, sir.
Great to have you on the EIB network.
Richard.
Everywhere in the show, why they don't name why they've got all these different names, like for Martin Luther King and stuff.
Wait, Richard, I need you to start over here because somebody in the staff screwed up and didn't have your petitiometer turned up.
So could you start again?
Sure.
You made a comment earlier in the show why everybody, why all these streets are named after Martin Luther King and why not LBJ?
Dallas-Fort Worth has the LBJ freeway.
I exempted Texas.
LBJ is all over Texas.
Okay, well, I missed that part.
I guess I was doing something else.
Outside of Texas, you don't find LBJ.
Well, you got an LBJ library something in Washington.
They just did the maybe they named the education building after him.
But you go around to not in Harlem.
He's not in Harlem.
He's not in South Central L.A. He's not in Detroit.
You don't find the LBJ boulevards in these places.
That's what I meant.
That's true.
Okay.
All right.
Well, I just wanted to clarify that through me, and I think you're doing a great job and keep up the good work.
Thank you, sir, very much.
I appreciate it.
Well, it looks like recession hopes may have been dealt a blow by industrial production numbers.
Industrial production in the U.S. greater than forecast in December as growth in exports helped make up for weakness in auto and housing-related industries.
Let me check the.
Yes, the Dow's been down as much as 200 points today.
It's up like 97 points right now.
It was down on the inflation news.
I think this news had brought it back up.
That place is so fickle anymore.
Inflation news, where there's going to be a rate cut, and these people go nuts.
The market goes up and down, starts fluctuating like crazy.
But anyway, recession hopes have been dealt a blow now by the industrial production numbers.
People desperately in the drive-bys hoping for a recession.
This is Ruth in Newport's, New York.
Nice to have you on the program.
An honor to speak with you, Rush.
I don't know what is more exciting today, me getting through to you or you getting the third female from across this beautiful country of ours who is just applauding Russia's, I mean, sorry, Romney's win last night in Michigan.
So you're a big rock Romneyite, too.
Well, I have to be honest with you.
I did not know who Romney was quite so until the beginning of the debates, which I have been watching and watching and watching and listening, which I wish everybody else would do.
I have always been, since my younger years as a teenager on through adulthood, I'm a year older than you are, but that's not too far.
A true conservative Republican, and I listened to what this man was saying and the principles that he stood for.
And he won me over.
He won me over.
And I had been hoping that people would start to just pay attention.
Pay attention.
Keep to their values, as you have been saying, and pay attention to what Romney is saying.
And they did.
And the only thing that made me...
I'm wondering, and it's hard to say this with three calls and one busy broadcast, but I wonder if we're uncovering something here that's being missed.
And that is that there's this army of women who apparently are really drawn to Romney.
I've not, in all the analysis and breakouts of exit polls, men and women, I've not seen it on the Republican side.
They haven't broken it down by genders that I've seen, but this is new to me.
You're right, you are the third babe today that's just going on and on and on about Mitt Romney.
It's all based on policy, right?
It's not based on how he looks.
It is based on policy.
Yes, he is a very good-looking man.
Okay.
But it is based on policy because we women who are true conservative Republicans and comfortable in our own skins and would never vote for anybody based on gender or race want to listen to what these candidates are saying.
Yes.
And we're listening.
What do you think of his wife and family?
I think that he has a lovely wife and five beautiful sons and daughters-in-law and grandchildren.
He comes across as a very wholesome American.
I think we need to.
More important than that, though, is for us to begin to see that he believes in Americans' ability to use their own minds and ingenuity to produce the best ideas and products and hope that the government would just step aside and allow the free market system to work and let our government just continue to protect us, so that we remain the strongest country in protecting freedom and homeland security and awareness.
warrant and ours.
Let's get to it, Carrick.
I'm running out of time.
I'm going to get the character side.
Does Romney, to you, exude a powerful morality?
He exudes the most powerful morality I have seen in any candidate.
So you know, you have no doubts he would never cheat on his wife.
That is correct.
This is fascinating.
This is absolutely...
Ruth, I can't thank you enough.
I thank you, Rush, and just keep up the wonderful work.
My husband and I listen to you every day, and we love you, and just keep that faith, because there are Republican conservatives out there who will prove who the true candidate will be.
And I believe it will be Romney.
We'll see.
I'm glad you called, Ruth.
I got to run because of the constraints of the programming format.
We will be right back.
We have decided, we've come up with a name for you babes who are smitten with Mitt Romney.
First of many, but this works.
I think Mittens.
We are going to refer to you as Mittens.
I got to go.
But we'll be back tomorrow.
We'll do it all over again.
Can't wait.
See you then.
▲
Export Selection