All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 7, 2008 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:25
January 7, 2008, Monday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey, hey, hey, hey, welcome back, folks.
Rush Limbaugh here once again under fire from the EIB Southern Command, the well-fortified, defended, and secured EIB Southern Command.
Great to have you with us.
Telephone numbers 800-282-2882, the email address rush at EIBnet.com.
All right, I've got a lot of audio soundbites I want to get to in this hour, but I want to go back to something that we uncovered earlier in the program, and that is Mrs. Clinton crying in New Hampshire today.
Finally, I have seen the video on ABC.
There were no tears.
Here is part of the bite.
It's not easy.
It's not easy.
And I couldn't do it if I just didn't, you know, passionately believe it was the right thing to do.
You know, I have so many opportunities from this country.
They just don't want to see us fall backwards.
Oh.
No.
So.
All right, that's enough of it.
That's enough.
That's the crocodile tears.
There were no tears.
This sets feminism back 50 years.
You're not supposed to cry when you start losing.
This is Pat Schroeder-esque.
Pat Schroeder ran for president from Colorado back in the 80s.
Well, she didn't run.
She was thinking about running, and she called a press conference in the shadows of the Rocky Mountains and said that she wasn't going to run.
And she actually did start bawling, started crying.
And I can't, I'm not running because I've decided I can't win.
And her husband was right there.
She buried her head in her husband's shoulder, said feminism back for who knows how many years.
These are crocodile tears.
There were no tears.
This was purely calculated.
This is Bill Clinton coaching her.
Look, don't bite your lower lip like I do.
They'll accuse you of copying me.
Do some fake tears out there.
Show them how much you really care.
December 22nd, PBS all-girl chat show called To the Contrary, hosted by the lovely and gracious Bonnie Urbay.
They had, let's see, Carrie Dominguez, Kim Gandy of the Nags, Dr. Bernadine Healy of U.S. News and World Report, and Eleanor Holmes Norton.
And they were talking about Mrs. Clinton in that picture.
And I commented on, do we really want to sit here and watch a female president age every day before our eyes?
This week, an unflattering picture of Senator Clinton appeared on the Drudge Report website, prompting conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh to ask whether America wanted to actually watch a woman get older before their eyes on a daily basis.
So what kind of response should he get to that kind of question?
Well, you know, Hillary may need to soften her image, but she doesn't need to cry in order to avoid a picture like that.
In fact, she better not cry because stereotypes are already setting in.
That's why you have that picture.
And yet, this is a stereotype.
Men are crying already.
Ask Romney on the stump, but she's got to be well.
So there is a double standard.
Don't give me that.
There's no double standard.
Ed Muskie cried, and that was it.
Tried to claim it was snowflakes, but it was tears, and he was out of there.
No double standard on this.
That was Eleanor Holmes Norton saying she better not cry.
She cried today.
She cares.
Carl Golden, writing at NewJersey.com.
Is this part of the Bergen record?
I am not sure that it is.
Okay, it's a collaboration.
Newjersey.com is a collaboration of sites from newspapers in New Jersey.
Carl Golden, Bill and Rush.
Perfect together?
News stories coming out of New Hampshire suggest that former President Bill Clinton, angry and frustrated over the defeat of his wife in the Iowa caucuses by Barack Obama, feels the media is complicit in Obama's victory, that it has a vested interest in his continued success.
Say, what?
Wasn't this the essence of what conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh said a few years ago about Donovan McNabb, that the media has a vested interest in seeing a black quarterback succeed in the NFL and therefore overlooked his flaws and shortcomings?
Limbaugh was bounced from his analyst role at ESPN within 48 hours, while politicians, candidates, civil rights leaders, sports figures, and anyone else with access to a microphone or printed pages fell all over one another to weigh in on his comments.
Clinton's complaint that the media is handing Obama a free pass is eerily similar and just as fallacious as Limbaugh's assertions about media coverage of McNabb.
The difference in reaction, however, is striking.
Limbaugh was accused of veiled racism, of using what he saw as a gentler treatment of McNabb as another instance of the liberal media promoting an unfair agenda of affirmative action, minority set-asides, and quotas in everything from college admissions to employment.
That's a little bit exaggerated.
That wasn't my point.
How many times have we discussed this?
At any rate, Limbaugh, of course, is as much an entertainer as analyst who makes his living by such commentary as a massed a legion of believers.
Consequently, he was an easy target for his opponents who used his remarks about McNabb and the media to belabor him and his views.
But no one stepped forward to challenge Clinton's assertion that his wife's campaign is being shortchanged by a media which is covertly giving aid and comfort to Obama's campaign.
Blaming the media for a candidate's loss is, of course, nothing new.
It's what candidates and their staffs do when their performance doesn't match expectations or hopes.
For the former president, however, to suggest the media is actually helping his wife's chief opponent takes blame shifting a step further.
Discontent is now bubbling to the surface over the heightened role he's taken in his wife's campaign, that he's upstaging her and drawing the spotlight to him.
But the irony involved in Clinton using a tactic similar to Limbaugh, the charter member of the vast right-wing conspiracy met on bringing down the Clintons, is just too delicious to let pass quietly.
That's Carl Golden, who gets it 75% right, maybe 80% right here at NewJersey.com.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, I have been thinking since this recent spate of callers from Huckabee supporters, which started about 50 minutes ago, 45 to 50 minutes ago.
Thought about it long and hard during the break.
Even been thinking about it here while doing other things, opening this hour's monologue segment.
And I want to say to you, Huckabee supporters, that you've convinced me.
I have been convinced.
I've been convinced through the power and the brilliance of your arguments made to me here on the phone on this program today that Governor Huckabee is a true conservative.
He is the only guy who is a true conservative.
And I have concluded that I am debasing myself and the conservative cause by questioning him.
As a matter of fact, Governor Huckabee was right to increase taxes by $500 million in Arkansas.
Governor Huckabee was right to offer in-state tuition to illegal aliens.
He was right to offer the Mexican government a consulate in Arkansas for $1 a year.
More states should show this kind of compassion.
Right there.
He offered, and when I learned this, so there's a conservative, the Mexican consulate, $1 a year in Arkansas.
He was right to release over 1,000 criminals.
This is conservative.
He is right to oppose school choice.
This is conservative.
And he was right to accuse President Bush of a bunker mentality and stubbornness in dealing with our enemies.
He was right in suggesting that the way to deal with bin Laden and Zawahiri and other enemies of the United States is to implement the golden rule.
He was right.
This is, ladies and gentlemen, the new conservatism.
It is both Reaganism and post-Reaganism, postmodern Reaganism and aftermodern post-Reaganism.
And I'm sitting here chastising my.
How could I have missed this?
After 20 years, how could I have missed this?
After 20 years, it has become clear after only eight weeks of Governor Huckabee on the scene, I now see the new conservatism.
No to school's choice, $500 million in tax increases, Mexican consulates in states for $1 a year, in-state tuition to illegal aliens, the new conservatism.
And how could all the rest of us, the tens of millions of conservatives who have yet to even vote in these primaries, and the over 60% in Iowa who did not vote for Governor Huckabee?
How could we have made such an error?
I have seen the light.
And we're back.
El Rushball with talent on lawn from a god.
I know, it's a great question.
Why would Mrs. Clinton all of a sudden cry now?
She didn't even cry coming out of the womb.
Coming out of the womb, she was screaming, get me out of here.
But she didn't cry.
We have it on great medical authority.
It's just that Clinton soap opera continuing.
I wonder if Harry Thomason, Elinda Bloodworth Thomason Kocher, you know, like they coached Bill on how to not say that or how to say that he never had sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky.
Not a single time, never.
Now, Bill Clinton thinks that the media propping up Obama, let's see if he has a point.
This morning on Morning Joe, Scarborough Show on PMSNBC, Andrea Mitchell says this about Hillary Clinton's rally yesterday.
One thing I did notice also, by the way, at one point she said, now who's here from New York?
And a whole group of people in the stands, high school gym, said, yes, we are.
And then afterwards, I started going around.
There were a lot of people from New York, East Hampton, from the Hudson Valley, people from Connecticut.
Well, that's not going to help you.
So they're shipping.
They're shipping in New York too.
They're packing the crowd.
They're packing the crowd.
Andrea Mitchell, one of Hillary's friends, or used to be, packing the crowd because she can't draw anybody in New Hampshire.
And this was what Andrea Mitchell also pointed out, Hillary's acceptance speech last Thursday night in Iowa, well, her concession speech last Thursday night that the room was a funereal dirge minutes before her speech began.
Tim Russert, same program, talking about Andrea Mitchell's comments.
At the Nashua High School.
And I talked to one of the guys, security guys, maintenance guys.
They tell you everything.
He said, they're all from Massachusetts.
Check the plates.
So I went out to the school parking lot, and I must say, the vast majority of the parish were from Massachusetts.
That's unbelievable.
That's Amika Bzezinski, the daughter of Zbigniew Zezhinsky, national security advisor for Jimmy Carter, who just now happens to be a drive-by media infobabe.
Funny coincidence, that, isn't it?
So here's NBC at least dumping on Mrs. Clinton, and they are acting fearless in face of the old testicle lockbox, essentially saying Mrs. Clinton packing the crowd.
Andrea Mitchell, appalled at what she's hearing from Clinton.
I can't make her young.
I can't make her male.
I can't make her.
What's he talking about?
I just have to tell you.
You know what, though, brother?
You can make her single.
And after this race, if he doesn't shut up, she is going to be single.
Because he also yesterday was blaming her staff for the Iowa.
They didn't do a good enough job getting the young vote out.
I can't make her young.
Well, that was specious anyway.
Here comes the story that Obama cleaned up amongst the young.
And so the next day, Hillary's out there making appeal for young people.
Her campaign's total reactive.
Here's what they're talking about.
Grab sound bites 28 and 29.
This, you could put this in the category here.
This is from Sunday.
Put this in the category of helpful husband.
We can't be a new story.
I'm sorry.
There's nothing we can do.
I can't make her younger, taller, male.
There's lots of things I can't do, but if you want a president and you need one, she would be by far the best.
Now, how helpful is that?
I can't make her younger.
I can't make her taller.
I can't make her male.
And they laughed.
They laughed at that one.
You can ask yourself why.
There's lots of things I can't do, but if you want a president, you need one.
She would be by far the best.
Scarborough had the great line.
You can make her single.
And here's Mrs. Clinton's spade work line.
Now, this, I guarantee, if I had said this, if Romney had said, if anybody had said this about Obama, the fur would be flying.
When they say to themselves, okay, I have a choice between a truly inspirational speaker who has not done the kind of spade work with the sort of experience that another candidate has.
Oh, folks, this is not coincidental.
I guarantee to you.
Look at, this is the bunch that depresses, suppresses black people in the Democrat Party, from Maynard Jackson to Carl McCall to the Reverend Jackson to Al Sharpton.
These are the people that when the blacks get too uppity, they get stomped down.
Hasn't done this.
That's right.
Spade work.
That's right.
Hasn't done the spade work.
Let's move on to some Republican sound bites.
This was fascinating.
This was last night after the Republican forum on Fox.
Frank Luntz, Republican hottie, by the way.
You would be amazed at the number of Republican women that think Frank Luntz, I mean, they're dying for Frank Luntz.
Frank, you should know this if you don't.
I've heard from three or four of them.
He talked with New Hampshire voters in a focus group in a restaurant after the forum last night.
He said, first off, show of hands.
How many of you walked in here without a committed candidate?
Raise your hands.
Virtually everybody walked in without a committed candidate.
How many of you walked in here supporting Romney?
Raise your hands.
How many of you are going to leave here supporting Romney?
Nobody, maybe a couple hands went up.
The first question, practically everybody's hand went up supporting Romney.
And the second question, what is it that's so overwhelming, Luntz asked the group.
What is it with Mitt Romney that he did today?
I think that he showed his qualities as an individual being a very strong leader with very strong moral background.
His statement on pro-life is he came through with conviction, where a lot of the other candidates did not.
Who didn't come through with conviction?
Huckabee.
Why not?
He waffled on the first question at least three, if not four times, couldn't come forth with a truthful answer.
How many thought Huckabee waffled the first response?
Did that have an impact on how you felt about him afterward?
Absolutely.
This is important because people formulate their point of view, their opinions, even within the first five minutes of the debate.
And if you make a blunder at the beginning, then they got a problem with you at the end.
That's Frank Lunt.
He also went on in this and asked about all the candidates.
And it was clear that in these people's minds, Romney won the night.
Didn't like Thompson at all, which kind of surprised me because I thought it was Romney and Thompson last night that did the best.
One person said, look, we're not Iowans, and I'm not voting for a pastor here.
I'm voting for a president when asked about Huckabee.
But as I said, the people in New Hampshire may not know who a real conservative is, based on the new definition that I have now recently admitted to having seen the light.
Now, what was this first exchange of the debate that these focus groupers said that gave them problems with Huckabee?
Basically, we have to play the answer after the break, but Chris Wallace's question: according to our study, during your time, 10 years as governor, you raised taxes, net increase of half a billion dollars.
So does Mitt Romney have a point when he talks about your record as a tax cutter?
The bite runs about 59 seconds, and it features an interchange between Romney and Huckabee.
And we will get to that soon as the break's over.
We'll be right back after this.
Don't go away.
Now think about it.
It just is, folks, redefining hip on the radio.
Rush Limbaugh from behind the Golden EIB microphone.
The Lunch Focus Group said that Huckabee blew the first question.
Didn't like it.
They said that he is questioned, he didn't answer with conviction, that he waffled on the first question at least three or four times, couldn't come forth with a true answer.
Here's the question from Chris Wallace.
According to your study, Governor Huckabee, or our study, during your time 10 years as governor, you raised taxes, net increase of a half a billion dollars.
So does Mitt Romney have a point when he talks about your record as a tax cutter?
Government's supposed to work.
It's not about the politics of saying I never raised a tax.
It's about saying I made government work.
And the fact is, there were specific issues that I've been attacked for, sometimes pretty brutally on some of these television spots.
But I'm proud of the fact that I governed and lowered taxes and did something that had never been done in my state and did it against the headwinds of a Democrat legislature that had never done it in 160 years before.
Facts just different things.
I think Mike agreed that net net, you raised taxes by half a billion dollars.
Is that right?
You know, Mitt, let's talk about how some facts are.
The fees I think you raised were more like a half a billion dollars, not $240.
You came into office.
I asked you a question with one.
Facts are different things.
Let's get the facts right.
Okay, I came in with the tax cuts in 2002.
You know, Mike, you make up facts faster than you talk, and that says something.
So let's slow it down and let's get the facts corrected.
I asked you a question to begin with.
And that was, NetNet, did you raise taxes in your state by half a billion dollars?
We raised jobs.
We built our roads.
You know, that's political speak.
Populist political speak.
We raise jobs.
We build our roads.
The exchange continued this way.
Now, let me go back to the question I've asked you that you've refused to answer three times.
Did you raise taxes, net, in Arkansas by $500 million?
A court order that said we had to improve education.
Maybe you don't have to obey the court in Massachusetts.
I did in Arkansas.
And you know something?
Education is a good thing for kids because kids like me.
Education is good in Devanture.
There is no court order that makes anybody raise taxes $500 million.
For the children.
For the children.
Dan in Burbank, California.
Great to have you with us, sir, on the EIB network.
Hello.
Hello, Rush.
Excuse me.
I have to just say wow to some of the earlier callers' comments.
I'll comment very quickly.
I don't want to analyze them too much, but it seems to me that they're confusing what would be associated with evangelical values, conservatism, but unfortunately, maybe they're having an identity politics crisis going on, unbeknownst to them.
And it may be a veiled attempt to just vote for an evangelical.
You know, obviously, maybe people think that, but I just wanted to throw it out there.
My real comment is this morning I resound absolutely with everything you said about the debate last night.
And I just think it was pretty obvious who came out more conservative, who came out more clear and strong.
And I appreciate your comments on the Clinton campaign as well.
I just think, contrary to those earlier callers, you have a bias that's more for the truth instead of a bias for identity politics or any of the above.
Which callers you talk to, the Huckabee callers?
Yeah, I think they kind of got together, like you said, and decided to blow up your phone this morning.
Well, I can't blame them.
I mean, they have the sense that they're candidates under attack, and I can't blame them for calling here and trying to set the record straight.
And we give them the chance when they get through.
And nobody can accuse us of denying the Huckabee supporters an opportunity to appear on the program.
Dan, thanks for the call.
One thing about what Governor Huckabee said here in a recent soundbite that we just aired is, I want to make government work.
Now, that, on one hand, it can seem pretty innocuous, but that to me was a red flag.
I'm not interested in government working.
I'm interested in government getting out of the way.
That's how it works as far as I'm concerned.
I'm not really into people who want to get involved in the process of government.
One of the greatest process government guys ever walked down the street was Michael Dukakis.
One of the greatest government process guys ever walked down the street was Bill Clinton.
One of the greatest government process guys to ever walk down the street was John Kerry, the haughty senator from Massachusetts who served in Vietnam.
The objective of making government work, I can see how it might be positive if your objective is to get it to do less and to do it more efficiently.
Michael in Indianapolis, welcome to the EIB Network, sir.
Hi, Rush.
Hi.
This is just incredible.
I've been listening to you ever since you went on to Wham Radio in Ann Arbor, Michigan.
But, Rush, first of all, I wanted to say, for the record, that you have never attacked Mike Huckabee.
I want to say for the record that you are not an entertainer.
Are you there?
I'm here.
Oh, okay.
You have changed my life.
I used to think that when you say, you know, on loan from God, talent on loan from God, that you were egotistical and everything.
After listening to you for four hours a day for four years, I realized that there is real humility in that statement.
Thank you, but it's three.
If you're getting four, I want to know who's impersonating me and the other one.
Well, I started listening to you at 12 o'clock on the computer, and up until just recently, Indianapolis, they delayed the program, so I listened to you until 4 o'clock.
Oh, okay, I get it.
So you got it again.
Yeah, yeah.
So you've been very good for me.
I appreciate that.
I would never, never, never even think of telling you that you are wrong.
But?
No, no, but.
Okay.
Okay.
I do believe that in your analysis that you have made some mistakes.
And I apologize.
I had several screens up on my laptop and my battery died.
So I'm going to have to go off of memory.
I would invite you and all of your listeners to go to mikehuckabee.com, go to two areas: the truth squad and the issues area.
And like I say, I'm going off of memory now, okay?
But Mike Huckabee is governor.
They cut taxes, I think it was 94 times, eliminated the capital gains tax on the sale of a home, cut the capital gains tax rate.
The sales tax was 1% higher when he left office than when he came in.
You may have missed it moments ago when I endorsed Governor Huckabee's new group.
Yeah, that was it.
Tax increases, $500 million and so forth, net net.
Well, but, you know.
This is the new conservatism.
I've seen the light.
I understand it.
Illegal aliens getting amnesty.
No, that's not true.
Tuition.
No, that's not true.
Well, you're destroying me here because this is the new conservatism.
Now, Rush, he never took it and promoted in-state tuition for illegals.
He proposed taking a merit scholarship program and expanding it to students who had been raised in the Arkansas school system that they would be allowed to become part, to receive a merit scholarship.
That program, had it been instituted, would have affected about 30 students.
It was not instituted.
The Club for Growth.
Now, just listen.
Do you realize that I'm getting emails from who is the Club for Growth?
I mean, I happen to know what it is, but you guys have got Club for Growth on the brain here.
Okay.
Well, the Club for Growth has run several ads against Governor Huckabee.
I'm sure you've seen the.
I haven't.
I haven't.
I have not seen the club for growth ads.
I've not read.
I know Stephen Moore, who heads up the club for growth.
Oh, Stephen Moore is not a cliver.
That's okay.
That's how much I know about it.
The guy I thought running, it's been gone for two years.
His name is Stephen Moore.
What is he, a son think tank or something?
Well, he's the political wires.
He started a new thing.
All right.
Well, then, see, a good guy left the club for growth, and some bunch of perverts has taken over and attacking Huckabee and the new conservatism.
Okay.
First of all, would you do me two favors, Rush?
Okay.
Number one, I think it would be very helpful for your listeners if you did a Limbaugh letter and had your set of questions and asked each of the candidates and put their viewpoints right next to each other.
Okay.
Yeah, we're making notes.
Then, second thing I would like you to do is in a real, clear, concise manner, and not the new conservatism, but your conservatism, lay out exactly what the conservatism is.
Hmm.
Now that is interesting because, see, I think I do that every day, but do I do it in list form?
Do I do it, this is conservatism?
I think I define it each and every day, and I have for 19 years, 19 plus years.
But if it needs to be done in a different format, a different way, I would be happy to do it.
That's what I try to do Friday, go back to the basics.
Because I think conservatism is being distorted, bent-shaped, flaked, and formed in ways here that if we're not careful, real conservatism is not going to be recognizable anymore because it's going to be redefined by all these people who are trying to say they are it when they're not.
As we mentioned earlier in the program, ladies and gentlemen, Bill Clinton out there blaming me for all the problems that his wife is having, along with the drive-by media.
And it's been brought to my attention that Carl Golden, NewJersey.com, a columnist, has said, you know, it's kind of interesting, Clinton blaming the media for supporting a black guy over his wife, and Limbaugh blames the media for propping up Donovan McNabb.
It's one and the same, but nobody's being critical of Clinton for doing this.
Clinton has me on the brain.
You know, he's upset.
He thinks the only reason people don't like Hillary is because I have been attacking her since she came on the national scene.
It could never be their problem.
It could never be, it could never be the fact that her health care was a disaster, that she's not like.
It could never be that.
No, it has to be that the people of this country are mind-numb robots, and I hold sway over all of you.
And whatever I say, you happen to agree with and act on it.
We all know that's not true.
I spent the first half hour of this program trying to warn people about Senator McCain.
He's probably going to win New Hampshire tomorrow.
Hope not, but he probably is.
What kind of sway do I have?
Huckabee won Iowa.
People are independent thinkers out there.
They're not mind-numbed robots in this program.
The Clintons can't get that through their heads.
Yesterday, reliable sources, Howard Kurtz, talked with John Dickerson of slate.com and asks him about Clinton's resentment for me attacking his wife, causing Hillary's negatives to go down.
Yeah, I've picked up the resentment by the ton.
They have two main complaints about the press.
One is the point Bill Clinton was making, which is that everybody talks about her divisiveness as if it's a quality only she possesses and makes no mention, or they would say make no mention of the fact that Republicans have demonized her over the last many years.
And the second complaint that they've been making for quite some time is that Obama is not getting the kind of scrutiny that Hillary Clinton gets.
She cannot do anything without everybody jumping on her and parsing it and talking about her various problems.
Right, see, there is the complaint that's similar to this guy in New Jersey saying that Clinton blaming the media for going soft on Obama and yet getting away with it.
You know, this I'll tell you, these people are starting to whine and moan.
I don't whine and moan.
If you talk about being vilified, mischaracterized, lied about, impugned, it's me and a whole bunch of people on our side by the Clinton machine.
Do we whine and moan about it?
No, we laugh about it and we roll on and we realize that our connection with our audience can overcome all of this.
These people, they actually believe, if this is true, that the only reason Hillary Clinton is disliked is because of me.
She has no part in this, and now they whine about it.
On C-SPAN's Washington Journal this morning, Susan Swain, a host, spoke with Ray Buckley, who's a New Hampshire Democrat Party chairman.
And she says, had a number of people calling, concerned that if a Democrat's elected to office, there'll be growth in entitlements.
What would you say to that?
The Republican sound machine obviously is getting their talking points out to their callers.
Or people need to maybe turn a different channel instead of just being on Fox all the time or listening to Rush Limbaugh.
In fact, the federal government has grown under George W. Bush.
It shrunk under Bill Clinton.
The deficit was erased under Bill Clinton, and we were actually paying off the deficit.
I wish I had more time here.
This guy is about 30% right in one thing he said.
But overall, the idea that Democrats don't expand entitlements.
Dirty little secret, as they all do, and we've got to do something about it.
But nevertheless, this program and I remain front and center in the brains and the minds of all these Democrats when they find themselves in trouble and can't explain it.
They have to lash out.
You know, there's one exception to this that I can, on the national scene, that I can point to, and that is Obama.
You know, we've had our parody fun with Obama, and we've been critical of Obama on issues, and his staff's not out there whining and moaning and blaming and so forth.
They're out there laughing at it or ignoring it.
They're acting like adults.
The Clintons are out there acting, how dare you attack me?
Don't you know who I am?
Don't you know who we are?
How dare you criticize me?
How dare you poison the American people against me and my wife?
I mean, the utter arrogance of that is breathtaking, but it is what it is, and it's something that we've come to expect and long ago recognized.
Folks, I meant to mention this earlier.
It just slipped my mind.
I have to be missing tomorrow.
I have to be off.
My mother's best friend, Mary Frances Hunter Kinder, passed away Friday night.
And the funeral is in Missouri tomorrow.
And I must go.
So, who we got tomorrow, HR?
Who do we find?
Well, we don't even have a guest host yet.
We're working on it, but it'll probably Jason Lewis.
I'll be back on Wednesday.
We'll talk about the results of the New Hampshire primary event.
▲
Export Selection