All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 18, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:59
October 18, 2007, Thursday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, greetings and welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, Rush Limbaugh and the Excellence in Broadcasting Network.
We come to you from the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
There are no graduates.
There are no degrees.
The learning never stops.
Just a bunch of ever-increasingly intelligent and informed scholars here at the Institute.
And you are among them.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882.
Email address, rush at EIBnet.com.
A couple things.
We're up to $131,100 now on the eBay auction for the Harry Reid smear letter to Mark Mays, the CEO of Clear Channel Communications, the syndication partner for this program.
And we're now into the final day.
We've got less than 24 hours at 1 o'clock tomorrow.
The auction will end.
And at that point, we will have a high bidder.
And we will vet the high bidder.
And the high bidder will be, I'm sure, qualified because everybody has to pre-qualify.
And so the letter will go out.
We're still working on how we're going to make the presentation to the high bidder.
Remember, I'm matching this.
The proceeds go to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, which provides college scholarships for the children of Marines and federal law enforcement officers who are killed in the line of duty, killed in action.
$29 million raised so far.
Really do great work.
And it's a tremendous group of people who are behind the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
99.9% of every dollar donated goes to the charity.
There aren't any administrative costs.
The zilch.
It's practically a straight pass-through.
And that's another one of the things that makes it very attractive.
Now, again, folks, there's a PDF file at rushlimbaugh.com, which is a copy, full-color copy, four pages of the Dingy Harry letter.
People throughout this week have been saying, look, why don't you put copies up there we can bid on?
Because I would like to donate to the foundation, but I can't afford where the current bid is.
We're giving that away.
If you want to make a donation to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation, there's a link at rushlimbaugh.com right at the top of the page, right along with the eBay link and the widget that shows the current bid.
But if you, whatever, buck, five bucks, whatever you want to donate, you can, but you don't have to.
You just download and have a copy of the Dingy Harry letter and the signatures.
And I did the scan myself, so it's flawless.
It is a flawless scan.
Even the two flaws in the original, which are on page two, will show up, especially you can see them on a computer if you just enlarge the file, enlarge the page, two little flaws, and they add to the authenticity of this.
It's just been a tremendous hoot all week.
A great amount of fun.
And I can't tell you we've done all this without the drive-by media.
There hasn't been one mention of this outside of Fox News that I know of.
And I was in the first hour of the program today, I was laughing because I was reading one of the New York newspapers today and some model, somebody had auctioned off some article of clothing or whatever for some typical cause.
Forget what it was, doesn't matter.
$48,000.
They were just going, oh, what a wonderful thing to do.
What a disappointment.
Here we're up to $131,100.
We've done this without the drive-bys.
We have turned this around on these 41 senators.
Don't you know they are livid?
We don't know, but we know.
They have to be livid.
The drive-bys have to be livid that this is working and is doing so well without their involvement.
The second item is, I mentioned in the last hour, the video of the entire Rush to Excellence tour appearance in Philadelphia last Thursday night.
We just got the video today.
I thought we were going to get it on Monday.
We just got it today.
We're encoding it now.
It will be on the website for members tonight at Rush 24-7 when we update the site to reflect the contents of today's program.
That's usually between 5:30 and 6 o'clock.
So the video will be there and up and running.
It's a trumpet fanfare, folks, and it means it's time for a feminist update.
So we go back to our groove yard of forgotten favorite archives for the theme.
Actual audio is real here.
Actual audio from a pro-choice rally amongst the nags and the feminazis back in the early 90s mixed with the Forrester sisters and men, and it's our official feminist update theme song.
All right, here is the feminist update.
It is from livescience.com.
Feminists have more fun is the headline.
It's a perfect example, this story, of using stupid, never-ending studies to change what we know to what they want us to know.
Feminism boosts sexual satisfaction for both men and women, a new study suggests.
BS.
BS, folks, 56.
Well, well, I'm not going to tell you how many years of experience, but I'm telling you, I've been through the feminist jungle out there.
It ain't true.
I don't care what studies they want to cite.
Here's the next line: busting stereotypes that peg feminists as ugly lesbians.
What stereotypes?
A new study shows that having a feminist partner is linked with healthier, more romantic, heterosexual relationships.
The study published online this week in the journal Sex Rolls relied.
Get us a subscription of that, Dawn.
We have all these magazines that are out there.
We never heard of them, Sex Rolls, relied on surveys of both college students and older adults, finding that women with egalitarian attitudes do find mates and men to find them attractive.
In fact, results reveal they're having a good time, maybe a better time than the non-feminists.
Both men and women are prone to holding negative views of feminists, the authors say, along with the sexually unattractive stereotypes.
Some women also view feminism as a movement for victims or for women who aren't competent enough to achieve success on their own.
This, according to Rutgers University researchers, that's not how I see them.
I just see them as miserable and unhappy.
Feminists are feminists because they're unhappy with how it's only human nature because human nature was so unkind to them.
Especially, go look at the undeniable truth of life number 24, folks.
Authored by me back in the late 80s, feminism was established so as to allow unattractive women easier access to the mainstream of society.
College-age women who reported having feminist male partners also reported higher quality relationships that were more stable than couples involving non-feminist male partners.
Oh, so traditional guys are just a bunch of lugheads and rogues, and you can't count on them in predators.
But these chickified guys, the feminist guys, why, those are the ones you can really have a great time.
Those are the ones you can control.
Those are the ones you can manipulate.
Those are the walk all over.
Those are the ones that are so henpecked the only thing they do behind their feminist wives' back is zip her up.
If she ever wears anything that needs to be zipped up, folks, let's be honest about something here.
Let's just cut to the chase.
Feminist male partners, which is funny because we know that feminist male partners come with batteries.
Yes, my friends, having more fun than a human being should be allowed to have.
Rush Limbaugh behind the golden EIB microphone, and let's grab some phone calls because people have been patiently waiting here.
Steve in Vermont on a cell phone.
Great to have you with us, sir.
Thank you.
How are you doing, Rush?
After that last feminist segment that you had, I'm not sure if this is the right lead-in call, but I actually happen to know your dirty little secret.
You are truly a normal person from a regular, plain old town that you're just a nice guy that has made it good.
You've got the job of your dreams.
And, you know, if we, the citizens, could have a citizen gold medal, boy, you would take it.
I really appreciate it.
I'm a guy of modest means.
I haven't got a lot of dough, but after this letter that you've got up for auction, there's no way I'm going to bid $170,000, but I can definitely scrape up $10, and I'm going to give it to the Marine Corps League.
And that's the best I can do.
Well, I can't outbid everybody and get that letter, but I can sure scrape up the $10 to do it.
I just want to let you know that your dirty little secret is a true normal person.
God bless you.
Thank you very much.
You say it's a dirty little secret.
How can it be a secret that I am a normal guy?
Well, you put on this air of like a larger-than-life figure, which I suppose you have to do because that's what you get paid to do.
But, you know, really, truly, underneath, I mean, you are no different than me or the next guy walking down the street.
You're just kind of a normal guy.
And I just, it comes through to a lot of people that can really understand the way that you talk and the way you're doing.
Well, that's pretty much it.
Pretty astute of you, but I just, I have to say I am larger than life in a lot of ways, while being normal at the same time.
You can do both.
I have demonstrated.
It's very nice of you to say this stuff, Steve.
I appreciate it.
Thank you so much for calling.
Bill in Lauris.
Is that right?
Laura, South Carolina.
Nice to have you with us, sir.
Thanks for holding on.
Thank you, Rush.
And I hope you've had your shots because I'm sending you up some dirty South Dittos from the redneck capital of the world.
You're talking about the NASCAR stuff of the Democrats needing inoculations in order to go to a race in Charlotte, right?
That's right.
That's right.
And I wanted to make a comment on the Turkish atrocities.
Us condemning the current government of Turkey for something that happened so long ago, it would be like another country condemning Nancy Pelosi for slavery in our country so many years ago.
This is true, but this is liberalism.
Liberalism is constantly feeling guilty, and they want to make excuses, and everybody's a victim, and they want to apologize because they want people to know that they are good people.
Actually, they want other people to apologize.
Liberals never have to apologize because they never do anything that requires an apology.
Now, since you brought this up, Bill, listen to this.
This is from Bill Salmon today in the Washington Examiner.
It's a story out of Columbia, South Carolina.
Republican presidential candidate John McCain said yesterday the Senate should apologize for slavery and segregation, calling them dark days or dark chapters in our history.
McCain said he would support a planned resolution by Sam Brownbeck, who is also seeking the presidency.
He's dropped out, I've heard, to apologize for racist laws, some of which ended more than a century ago.
This makes your point.
The current Senate did not author those bills.
The current Senate had nothing to do with it.
The current Senate cannot apologize for what the old Senate did.
If McCain wants to apologize personally for it, for whatever reason, I mean, here we are in a presidential primary and he's trying to resurrect himself.
And by the way, I should point out that there are a lot of people, well, I don't know a lot, but there are some in the drive-by media who claim that he has revitalized himself.
Joe Klein is one of them.
I'm looking for the piece.
Now I've got too many stacks here.
Anyway, he's starting to revive him.
John McCain is back.
Well, not with this.
This, this, this, this.
You know what he's trying to do with these?
He's trying to get his base back.
And who's his base?
The drive-by media.
This is nonsensical.
It goes straight to the point that you were making.
Here's Penny in San Diego.
Hi, Penny.
Nice to have you with us.
I got to tell you, I am here to say that you are not an ordinary man.
I heard that gal hitting on you last week, and it was sizzling radio.
I'll tell you, the reactions to that that I got ran the gamut, Penny.
It was incredible.
I had people saying, gosh, get a room.
Go take a shower.
Don't do this in public.
I was just minding my own business here.
Well, I am not a feminist, and I don't think she was either.
No way a feminist would behave that way.
Well, but not the way she did it.
She was smart.
Right.
Well, I would like to give a shout out to my two favorite men in Indiana, my father, Larry Preston, and happy birthday to my father-in-law, Henry Hendricks.
No, that's not why I called you.
I wanted to call you about the Morgan Stanley situation with them dumping the New York Times stock.
Yeah, go ahead.
What were you going to say?
Well, I know you talked about it yesterday, but I have to tell you what I did.
About three weeks ago, I called them and told them how upset I was about what they did to General Petraeus.
And I called their advertising department.
I called their circulation department.
And I called their subscription department and told these people that I hoped that I would continue to hear of falling advertising revenue, falling subscription rates, and falling share prices.
You got what you wanted.
Yeah, and so this is another example of the fact that we are winning because people are listening.
And it's really because of you and those like you that are giving us a voice.
Well, you know, it's interesting about the New York Times.
You talked about it yesterday, as you said.
There are two classes of stock.
The family owns one class, and it's the only class that can vote.
And then there's the other guys.
And then Morgan Stanley, they've had a guy there that I forget his name, but he runs a unit, and he's been expressing his dissatisfaction with the performance of the New York Times company.
They own a lot of things.
They own a lot of little newspapers.
They own the Boston Globe.
I think they still have some TV stations, although they might have sold them.
They had some classical radio stations at one time.
But stock price is plumbing.
Circulation is down.
Advertising revenues are down.
The Schulzberger family is not going to let this paper get out of their hands.
Now, it may not look good for Pinch, Arthur Schulzberger Jr. right now, but there are a lot of people on the conservative side that are fantasizing about the New York Times going out of business or leaving the Schulzbergers' hands.
I just, I don't see that happening.
But there's bound to be huge trouble.
One of the financial problems that they're having, by the way, and people don't talk about this, there's a blog out there that spends a lot of time.
If you really want to find out what's going on with the business side of the New York Times, go to the American thinker Thomas Lifson writes about this at suitable intervals.
But Pinch went out and spent all kinds of money on a brand new building in Times Square for the New York Times.
And this is a, it's just been a huge drag.
And of course, it has nothing to do with generating revenue.
And they're having trouble doing that.
Their audience, they're making no attempt to make this a paper for virtually everybody.
Their audience is as restricted and niche as anything is, although it's large because most of their subscribers are in New York City and they're liberals.
And so they've decided that's who their audience is going to be rather than try to branch out and make it a paper that anybody would like to read from front to back.
It's just, it's become the official rag of the arts and croissant crowd.
And people who live in dream worlds think they're important when they're not, think they're relative when they're not, relevant when they're not.
I'm not talking about the right.
I'm talking about who reads this paper.
The staff has got some good journalists there and good reporters, but on the op-ed page, you can't tell the difference in that on the front page.
And so content is also a factor in what's happening.
But really, some pretty poor business decisions have been made by Little Pinch, and they're coming home to roost.
And naturally, investors are not dropping out because of the moveon.org ad or any of that.
It's a business decision.
Back in a sec.
Well, I just checked the bid at eBay, $131,325.
I have never seen an increment other than $100.
So $131, $325 on the eBay auction for the Dingy Harry Letter.
The auction expires in 23 and a half hours.
It is Hassan El Masri is the Morgan Stanley guy tried to force the New York Times and a little pinch to reform their two-class system of shareholding.
And since the Times family is not going to give anybody other than family members a vote, Morgan Stanley took their cash out, sold their stock.
Now, somebody bought the stock.
You know, when you dump, if you sell it, somebody has to buy it.
Wouldn't it be funny if some do-buy bunch ended up buying the Morgan Stanley shares in the New York Times?
All right, the House has, as expected, failed to override the president's veto of the S-CHIP bill, the state children's health insurance program.
You got to listen to, here's Nancy Pelosi.
You got to listen to her with two, we have two soundbites, an impassioned speech imploring the members to do this for the children.
We had a decision today to override the president's veto, which would be, in my view, the right thing to do for our children and for our country.
It's not about compassion.
It's about fairness.
It's about fairness.
And this is a bill, again, that has been bipartisan in its development and required enormous sacrifice from the Democrats and the House of Representatives.
My God.
He had a much higher goal.
This is what is achievable for the children.
It should have been signed by the president.
There is no reason that he has given that is consistent with the facts.
That is embarrassing.
That, folks, is literally pathetic.
It is embarrassing.
It's about fairness.
It's not about compassion.
What are they giving up on compassion?
Fairness?
Fair to who?
And then this is something that has been required enormous sacrifice from Democrats.
Here's the second of our two bites that we have.
Come forward on behalf of the children and let's truly send a signal that we are about the future.
I tried to do that when I was sworn in by being surrounded by children.
It was a spontaneous moment, but it was one that was clear in its message.
We are gaveling this house to order on behalf of the children.
There is nothing more important than we have to do in our work than make sure that our children are healthy and safe.
Today we have an opportunity to do that.
Let's not miss that opportunity.
Let's give a vote for the children and against the president's veto.
Yeah, well, it all went down in flames.
They needed 290 votes.
They did not get it.
The override failed.
The veto has been sustained.
Mrs. Pelosi now has been documented yet another leadership failure.
This is pathetic.
This is embarrassing.
Let's do it for the children.
It's worked for them in the past.
Everything's for the children, but this bombed out big time.
Let's go to presidential politics here for just a second.
In the Hill newspaper today, there's a story by Bob Kusak in which Mrs. Clinton is saying she has 35 years of experience.
You know, she's being hit pretty hard by Barack Obama, who's fading away, by the way, big time, and the Brick girl.
And the Brick girl is not any experience.
What experience does she have?
It's getting a little rough out there.
So Mrs. Clinton feels a need to come forth and suggest that she has a lot of experience.
In a concerted effort to deflect these attacks on her credentials, Senator Hillary Clinton and her allies repeatedly say she has 35 years of relevant experience.
Now, she's only been an elected official seven years, but the drumbeat of soundbites and statements touting the 35-year figure appears to have paid off.
Even her Democrat rivals prefer to assail her electability rather than her experience.
Well, what experience does she have?
You know, folks, she's got 35 years' experience in bimbo eruptions, and I'm not trying to be funny.
Well, Dawn, you can sit in there and laugh, and I know it is funny, but she does.
35 years' experience of bimbo eruptions.
But what else does she have experience doing that you can point to and say it was done well?
She took over education in Arkansas.
I think Arkansas ranked like in the low 40s when she took over.
When she left, when they left, she was through.
It was 49th.
She bollocks that.
She, you know, the only thing you could say she did well and did right was the Cattle Futures thing.
$10,000 became $100,000 or $1,000 became whatever it was.
But she goofed up the administrative duties of the healthcare plan in 1994.
93.
She messed up handling the Paula Jones case.
You can go down a list of things here.
I ask people every time Hillary comes up, they start talking about her, and I just stop.
Stop.
Would you tell me why in the world we're even talking about her?
Why in the world does this woman qualify as being the only one person who can be the architect of health care reform in this country?
Where did this notion settle in?
The first time she tried it, it was horrible.
And the details of her plan were frightening.
It went nowhere once people found out about it.
Would somebody, where does this assumption come from?
It's remarkable that somebody who really has done nothing of any consequence, even in the Senate, frankly, can talk about how she's going to change various industries, how she's going to fight wars.
If she's elected, folks, she's going to have less experience than any president who comes to mind.
Her entire record, such as it is, is full of talk about what she supported, what she said 35 years ago, where she traveled to, who she spoke to.
There's nothing there.
There's no there there.
All she can point to is the things she cared about, the things she thought about, the people she fought and beat.
But there's no resume here.
And I think, you know, this is something talking yesterday about don't accept the premise or the various premises of liberalism.
And one of the premises here is she's the smartest woman in the world.
Evidence, please, can we have the evidence?
The only woman that can handle health care.
She cares about it so much.
Evidence, please, can we see the evidence?
She was not a great lawyer based on her own activities in Arkansas.
She's never run anything of consequence.
She never produced anything.
She never employed more than 14 people or so in her Senate office.
She can talk about, but she doesn't have to make that payroll.
You make the payroll.
You pay for her staff.
You pay for her.
She can talk about bills that she introduced and advocacy groups that she supported, but that doesn't mean very much.
She damns every industry and insists they need to be controlled by government.
Their profits need to be taken.
We have been sold a bill of goods, ladies and gentlemen, about how smart and about how experienced Hillary Rodham Clinton is.
And the fact is, she has never shown us anything in anything that she's ever done how smart she is.
She has no experience that relates to serving as president.
The things that we know that she've done, we all question.
And we all wonder why in the world she's receiving accolades for this stuff when they were botched.
Yeah, I mean, she was first lady, but I'm talking about the kind of experience you earn on your own that makes you prepared for the presidency.
First lady is a first lady, but at the end of the day, nothing was on her shoulders.
No full-fledged constitutional responsibility was on her shoulders.
And she didn't get elected.
She probably doesn't realize that.
A blue plate special, buy one, get one free.
She probably thinks she was, but she wasn't.
So she can take on whatever she wanted to take on at her husband gave her.
At the end of the day, it's not her responsibility.
She's never been a diplomat.
She's never been a governor.
She's never been a general.
Never worked in any of the industries that she wants to regulate.
Quick time out.
We'll be right back.
Don't go anywhere.
You got to hear this, folks.
Forteny Pete Stark, member of Congress, California, on the floor of the House today, lost it in comments he made on the war.
Republicans stood up and tried to have his remarks taken down.
That's a formal procedure to punish a member of Congress for breaching the House's standards of decorum.
Fortney Pete Stark.
They sure don't care about finding $200 billion to fight the illegal war in Iraq.
Where are you going to get that money?
You're going to tell us lies like you're telling us today?
Is that how you're going to fund the war?
You don't have money to fund the war or children, but you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement.
They have lost it.
If there is any doubt, they have totally lost it.
This is probably, I don't know for sure, I'm going to speculate since he brought children into this, that this is in some of the debate, the speeches prior to the override vote on the S-CHIP bill.
Because he said here, you don't have money to fund the war or children, but you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough, meaning to hit 18, because they're going to die because we're not going to pass the S-CHIP program is the implication, for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement.
Since he didn't single out any particular Republican by name, the remarks were not taken down.
But he was talking about the Republican.
You've got to play this again.
I know you want to hear this again.
Listen to it again.
They sure don't care about finding $200 billion to fight the illegal war in Iraq.
Where are you going to get that money?
You're going to tell us lies like you're telling us today?
Is that how you're going to fund the war?
You don't have money to fund the war or children.
But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement.
The National Republican Congressional Committee declared that he had trampled on the sacrifice of our troops with this comment.
This guy, look, he's long been a wacko.
He's from the Bay Area, long been a full-fledged, certifiable nutcase.
Probably shows up to the House in a little yellow bus every day and then goes back to the happy home at the end of the House session.
This is who they are, folks.
Now, I know a lot of people, rush, this is not all Democrats.
You can't generalize like that.
He is much closer to them than you might want to admit, much closer to them than you realize.
He's certainly a dead ringer for the people on their blogs out there that are yanking the chains.
The kind of anti-war activists that Dingy Harry goes to see on a Monday night that nobody knows about until afterwards, that's the way they think.
Those are the people telling Dingy Harry what they're unhappy about, and these are the kind of people Dingy Harry has to try to keep happy.
Same way Pelosi.
You heard her complaining and whining the other day of all these protesters polluting her yard and her garden by hanging out there.
She couldn't get rid of them because they had impeached Bush t-shirts on, which meant it was a free speech issue.
Fortney Pete Stark is one of those guys.
I mean, he's not out there on her lawn, but the way they think, these guys are just, they're brain-attled.
This is, this is, this is battered liberal syndrome.
This is, maybe, maybe what's happening here is this amoeba, whatever this germ is that's ravaging the country has gotten into these people's heads.
By the way, Mrs. Clinton, one more thing on this before we grab a quick phone caller here.
Accessories or successes, successes that she has that she can hang her hat on, cattle futures.
And what else?
Do you know what she's an expert in?
I'm just going to detail it because so many people, I got the email.
What do you can't say then?
Bimbo eruptions.
35 years experience in bimbo eruptions.
Let me tell you what she's an expert in.
Investigating, intimidating, and smearing her husband's other women.
That was her job, ladies and gentlemen.
Tapping phone calls and listening into the phone calls from a book by two New York Times guys who stand by the story that she was monitoring cell phone calls of opponents of claims of bimbo eruptions.
And this, that's her expertise.
Her expertise is smearing, investigating, and getting rid of political enemies.
That's what she's good at.
And that's it.
David in Raleigh, North Carolina, I'm glad you waited, sir.
You've been on hold here for quite a while.
I appreciate it.
Yes, sir.
How are you, Rush?
No, I'm never, never, never better.
Thank you.
All right.
Rush, I've been listening to you since the 02 election.
And if we didn't have you around, it'd be tough to navigate through all this stuff.
But thank you for what you do.
I appreciate that.
Thank you.
Yes, sir.
I was on the couch yesterday evening finishing up my offer and compromise to the IRS so I could get a life back.
And the evening news is on.
And Charlie Gibson comes on after about three stories and says, oh, and by the way, the new SMO act today, he hesitated for a second or two, and then he said, there is none.
I said, have I gone to sleep and work and we have that soundbite, but before I play that soundbite, I got two questions.
Yes, sir.
It's October 18th.
What are you working on now for your taxes?
Well, I had some tax problems.
They went back and used an off-the-wall.
Oh, okay, okay, okay, okay.
Now, remember, you don't have to indulge personal details.
We're nowhere near a quarterly filing date, so I wonder what.
Second thing, what in the world are you doing with the world news tonight on?
Well, that was, I was sitting there, my kids were there, older kids, and they just had it on.
It just happened to come on.
They were watching something else.
See, everybody said, yeah, it was on, but nobody knows.
Nobody knows how it got turned on.
Nobody was listening to it.
It was on.
I was doing something else.
It really didn't caught my attention when he said it.
I couldn't talk.
Well, here, here's, listen to the whole thing.
You didn't report the whole thing.
This is Charlie Gibson wordled news tonight on ABC.
One item from Baghdad today.
The news is that there is no news.
The police told us that to their knowledge, there were no major acts of violence.
Attacks are down in Baghdad, and today no bombings or roadside explosions were reported.
And that's not news.
That is news.
That is huge news, but not to these guys because it doesn't fit the narrative, ladies.
The narrative is burning cars, IEDs, people in the streets, mangled bodies, smoke wafting up from the streets.
And none of that happened yesterday in Iraq.
There's no news.
This is just the greatest illustration.
I keep saying that, but they keep outdoing themselves, illustrating to one and all just how they work and how they operate.
I got to take a quick break.
We'll be right back.
Would you calm down in there?
I know exactly what nobody, nobody thinks I can run this show.
Sit there and panic.
There's a new poll out.
Americans are less pessimistic about the Iraq war.
I'll have details of this as the next hour begins.
Also, we're now $131,325 at eBay on the auction of a dingy Harry letter proceeds to the Marine Corps Law Enforcement Foundation.
▲
Export Selection