All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 31, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:20
January 31, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host on this program make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
And there is a reason because I'm right.
And we look for the bars.
Sorry, I thought I'd turn them on.
I really thought.
Just turned back the picture for the Ditto cameras out there.
Don't panic.
You ought to see the email I get.
What are you doing in there when you turn the bars on?
I've got all kinds of suggestions and accusations being tossed at me by people who watch the program at rushlimbaugh.com on the DittoCam.
I turn the bars on at the top of the hour break because there are things going on in here.
You know, some of these three hours have to be private, folks.
It's a radio show.
So I turn the bars on.
People panicking.
It's just not the same when you turn the bars.
Get real, folks.
There's nothing happening here.
The top of the hour breaks in it.
Well, there is, but it's not for you to see.
Here's the number 800-282-2882.
All right, we've posted the picture of John Edwards' new estate, the 28,000 square foot main house.
By the way, and the barn that's where the basketball court is and the gym and everything.
I have no quarrel.
I don't want anybody to misunderstand.
People can spend their money however they want.
With Edwards, this is a guy running around talking about the poverty-stricken circumstances that so many Americans endure in this country and how this country doesn't have opportunity for people, and he needs to be elected president to fix it.
It's all two Americas gunk.
What I want you to notice in this picture is the clear-cutting.
Take a look at the environmental destruction that took place to build this house.
Second thing I want to point out to you is on top of the barn, just go to www.rushlimbaugh.com.
We've posted the picture up there now.
If you look at the top of the barn, you will see what looks like a tower on top of the barn or the red building, whatever it is, in its barn.
Now, my theory, ladies and gentlemen, is that what Biden has done, he has clear-cut this area.
And I don't know how far the clear-cutting goes, and he may not be through with the clear-cutting.
He may be planning on building a runway that would handle a Boeing 747, such as Air Force One.
Or maybe a smaller version of Air Force One he could fly into, like a G5 or a 757, a 737, whatever he's in would be Air Force One.
And that may be what the tower is for.
Sort of like a miniature air traffic control thing.
If not, he's obviously going to have a helipad there so that Marine One can land as he's president and he can get back to his North Carolina White House.
If I'm wrong about this, this tower is just a security tower where marksmen will be standing by prepared to shoot anybody from the second America that dares try to get close to his estate.
Welcome back, folks.
Aren't you glad you're here?
By the way, one more global warming story.
Deep mountain snow usually drives mooses to seek lower ground.
And I know it's moose, but I want to be understood by people in Riolinda.
Anyway, the mooses seek lower ground in Anchorage.
Deep mountain snow forces mooses to come closer to the city.
But the snow in Anchorage, Alaska, which is near where the earth is heating up to the point we're going to lose the earth, near the Arctic Circle, the snow is piling up in Anchorage this winter in record amounts, and it's a bit much even for the mooses.
So the mooses are going where they'd rather not go.
They are choosing major roads, plowed sidewalks, and groomed trails to sidestep the snow in the neighborhoods and the green belts that left during a remarkably temperamental month in Alaska's largest city.
The mooses weigh a half ton, and that's a thousand pounds.
They're even showing up downtown, placidly gnawing on bear trees at busy intersections.
They don't want to walk through the deep snow either, said state wildlife biologist Rick Sinnett.
Most mooses don't really want to interact with people in cars and dogs, but here they're not able to totally avoid them because the snow in Anchorage.
Now, I thought that we had global warming and all this hot weather was causing the ice caps to melt up there.
No, We got snow.
I mean, how can it be that the polar bears are dying because it's so hot where they are?
And the mooses in Anchorage, Alaska are having to abandon their normal winter habitat for the city of Anchorage where there's even more snow.
Now, you say, this is an isolated example.
Folks, I'm just doing the same thing they do.
If you have in the month of January a temperature of 65 degrees in New York or Chicago, global warming, global warming, global warming.
Okay, I'll pick an American city where there's more snow than they've ever had.
So much snow that the mooses are being forced out of their natural habitat.
Global warming, global warming isn't happening.
Global warming, global warming isn't happening.
Use the same logic they do.
If an unusually warm day in the middle of winter in a northern city takes place is evidence of global warming, why could I turn around and say record snow in the city of Anchorage causing mooses to relocate isn't evidence of global warming.
Why could I cherry-pick individual weather incidents to prove my case?
Well, because Mithril Limbaugh, you can only cite one case where winter is unuthly.
Oh, yeah, take a look at the map today.
19 degrees in Kansas City in snow, 13 degrees in Denver, 34 degrees and falling in Dallas with freezing rain.
Dallas, Texas.
Guess what?
We went below freezing down here in central Florida a couple nights ago.
We are still five or six degrees below normal, and it's Super Bowl week.
Now, it's going to be 80 and 84 and 85 on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, but on Sunday, it'll be 76 down in Miami with some rain.
That's the forecast now.
So how can there be global warming?
We have freezing temperatures in California where the citrus crop was destroyed.
What, $1 billion worth of citrus?
How come I can't point to that and say, well, it can't be global warming.
How could that, if the world is warming up to the point of utter destruction, if the world is warming up such a way that we're literally going to destroy the planet as we know it, how in the world can it get so cold in Los Angeles?
How can it snow in Malibu?
Why can't I say global warming?
There can't possibly be any warming.
It's colder in Malibu than it's been 30 years.
The citrus crop in California ruined?
How come I can't say that?
Because it's just one or two examples of Mithril Limbaugh.
So just take their technique, turn it right around on them, my good buddies.
Same thing.
That's all they're doing.
I guarantee you, you know, back in 1979 or 74, whatever it was, Newsweek did this big cover story on global cooling and the coming ice age.
If since the mid-80s, the environmentalist wackos had been touting global cooling instead of global warming.
And if there had been this consistent drumbeat, I'll guarantee what will happen, what would have happened, every example of freezing cold weather would have been cited as evidence of it.
In the summertime where a coal front went through some town clearing all the humidity out, say the temperature was 10 degrees below normal, which happens sometimes in certain warm climates in August, September, they would have said, see, global cooling, global cooling.
Citrus crop being destroyed in California, cold temperatures in Florida this week, the snow and ice in Anchorage, Alaska, global cooling, global cooling.
And everybody would believe that global cooling is taking place.
So it's all a sham.
It's all a scam.
And all it is, is an effort to expand the role of the United Nations and for poor countries to get their hands in the pockets of rich countries, expand the role of government in people's lives, and to make you feel as guilty as you can about the way you're living your life because that's what's causing all these catastrophes so that in your guilt, you will be more readily agreeable to paying higher taxes,
to replacing light bulbs in your house, doing all kinds of stupid, irrelevant things.
Guess what?
The latest thing they've learned about ethanol is it creates more smog than gasoline.
So not only are we driving up the world price of corn, it's going to lead to riots in Mexico over the price of tortillas.
Not only are we raising the price of corn and the price of food thus around the world in third world countries, because we're taking so much of the corn selfishly and using it ourselves under the misguided premise that we are making the world cleaner produces more smog.
It's one of those little, oh, by the way, gang, there's a news story today.
By the way, you know, one we didn't tell you about.
Ethanol creates more smog.
You're just citing individual examples, Mr. Limbaugh.
You refuse to see the truth.
That's the voice, by the way, of the new Castrati.
The spineless, gutless, testicle-free wonders that rule the world these days.
Back in just a second.
Flash, flash, bulletin, bulletin, bulletin, peep, beep, beep, beep, beep, whatever.
Just cleared, ladies and gentlemen.
This is from the Ottawa Globe and Mail.
Humans have already left such a deep footprint on the environment that the effects of global warming will last for the next 1,000 years, according to the draft copy of a new report.
The Globe and Mail obtained an early version of the climate change study being prepared by the world's leading scientists and reported that little doubt remains that the planet is getting hotter.
It says that human influence on the atmosphere during the 21st century alone will propel global warming for another 1,000 years based on estimates of how long it'll take nature to clean the air of gases that contribute to climate change.
When the hell is that going to happen?
What they mean is the next ice age.
Now, here we go again.
The weathermen of the world cannot predict weather for tomorrow.
I have been tracking this.
As you know, ladies and gentlemen, the Super Bowl is Sunday, Dolphin Stadium, kickoff around 6.30.
The Chicago Bears and the Indianapolis Colts.
Well, I got some people.
I've got some guests going to the game.
I secured a suite at Dolphins Stadium, putting some clients and friends in there.
I am not going.
I got it for them.
So I've been very concerned about the weather for these people.
The AccuWeather.
I can read these.
Snerdley.
Well, I never heard about this.
He didn't invite me.
Did you want to go to the game?
No.
Oh, you can't understand why I don't.
I've been.
This is for people who've not been.
I'm just, I'm just.
I just can't.
Besides, I've got my little theater room with my big screen and so forth.
I want to watch the game.
I don't want to be.
Yeah.
This is an example of my generosity, Snerdley.
This is.
Anyway, well, don't let me sidetracked here.
So I'm hoping that the weather is okay.
We've had a great winter in South Florida.
Would you not agree?
Our average temperature since, well, I guess October has been in the 80s.
So AccuWeather, the AccuWeather site, forecasts weather for 15 days.
So two weeks ago, I began checking the AccuWeather site for weather on Super Bowl Sunday in Miami.
And 15 days ago, or whatever it was, when it was two weeks from the game, the first day I checked, the forecast for February 4th was for a massive cold front to sweep in Saturday night.
The high temperature was going to be 64 degrees, a low the night before the Super Bowl of some, we're in the 40s, and there was going to be wind and rain.
So I have a friend, a couple friends that work in the Super Bowl host committee, and I said, uh-oh, all the work you've been doing the past two years, look at what's going to happen Super Bowl Sunday.
And I sent them a forecast.
And I said, don't worry, I will guarantee you this is not right.
I will guarantee you this is going to change.
That forecast was the same the next day.
13 days away from the Super Bowl, totally different.
Super Bowl Sunday was going to be a high of 80, a low of 65, no chance of rain.
In just two days, the weather forecast for my weather, and I'm nothing against AccuWeather.
I mean, don't misunderstand this.
I'm talking about the science of predicting things.
Two-day range, we had a high-temperature forecast of 66 in rain, go up to 80 and no rain and 65 at night with sunshine.
And it has changed every day that I have looked at it.
It has gone from a high of 82.
It is now currently rain in the daytime and 76 for an afternoon high.
The low temperature, 60, the rain ends.
That's the forecast for Sunday in Miami.
It's different than any day previous to today.
Just two days ago, they were forecasting glorious sunshine.
And who knows what the weather's going to, when we get closer to it, they'll be more accurate about the prediction.
My point is that here we, in just a, like a seven-day span or eight or nine-day span, the forecast for Miami at the Super Bowl on Super Bowl Sunday has been all over the place.
Now we've got these jerks, these scientists, telling us that global warming will last for 1,000 years.
That's probably 950 years longer than the war on terror is forecast to last.
Now, if you want to take this headline, global warming to last for 1,000 years, there's a positive way of looking at this.
The way I choose to look at life, great news.
Global warming only a temporary phenomenon because it's going to end in a thousand years.
My friends, the effort here to just make you feel so damn guilty so that you will acquiesce to the demands of the world's elitists and socialists to hire taxes to fix the problems you've caused and created knows no bounds now.
Global warming to last for 1,000 years.
I mean, you project this out long enough, and there's no one to know who's stupid, how stupid people are, once you start changing the predictions.
It is mind-boggling.
You just keep in mind.
And you can go to the AttackUWeather site yourself.
And again, I don't want anybody calling Joe Bistardi up there and saying Limbaugh would dump it on you.
I'm not.
Simply trying to illustrate, I mean, they have a great reputation and they take a great risk in putting a two-week weather forecast on a website.
They can do it for any city in the country.
A 15-day forecast is a huge risk.
People make travel plans based on this, a whole bunch of things.
And it's just been all over the place.
It's been erratic as it can be.
Let's see.
We got a quick phone call in here.
Michael in Pequa, Ohio.
Welcome to the EIB Network, sir.
Great to have you with us.
Hey, what's going on, Rush?
I'm calling.
Good.
Thank you.
Great to hear from you.
Man, Hugo Chavez.
Hear anything about this in the papers?
Taking over.
He sees total control of the private sector, electricity, telecommunications, energy.
And he was greeted with open arms, I believe it was today or yesterday, by his people and mostly the supporters of his party.
I think all we're missing here is basically a little Heil Hitler.
If they don't greet him with open arms and die, or they get put into a prison designed by Fidel Castro, Cesar Chavez, a dictator.
He's what?
Hugo.
I keep getting these two guys confused.
Caesar, Hugo.
Chavez is Chavez.
But you know, the guy's pretty clean.
I saw him at the United Nations make that speech, and he's very, very articulate, like Barack Obama is a clean black guy and an articulate black guy.
Hugo Chavez has the same characteristics.
But he's a dictator, nationalizing everything, big oil, phones, television shows, stations, networks, broadcast facilities.
There won't be very many more elections in that country.
And it's in the news, but the Joint Buy Media is not concerned about it.
They love dictators.
They envy the power that these dictators.
I'm not kidding you.
They envy the Democrats.
Liberals envy the power these people have.
Chavez is not the enemy.
He's just trying to do the best he can for his people.
We'll be back.
Plus, Democrats love him.
Yes, a little Tank Johnson music here, folks.
El Rushbo and the EIB network 800-282-2882.
All right, here it is.
This is from an interview that Senator Biden gave with the New York Observer.
I mean, you got the first sort of mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and nice looking guy.
That is Joe Biden in an interview with the New York Observer discussing the appearance of Illinois Senator Barack Hussein Obama.
Articulate, bright, clean, nice-looking guy.
First mainstream African-American who is, no, he's not the first mainstream African-American.
He is the first mainstream African-American who is articulate.
He is the first mainstream African American who is bright.
He is the first mainstream African American who is clean.
He is the first mainstream African American who is a nice-looking guy.
I still don't see what all the hubbub's about.
And there really isn't any.
I mean, I remember MSNBC did a whole story on this, and he was on Good Morning America.
The drive-bys are not bringing this up.
They know it's no big deal.
It would have been a big deal if I said it.
Senator Kennedy, upset, ladies and gentlemen, the Senate voted overwhelmingly yesterday to move ahead on a bill to increase the minimum wage, signaling the measure is likely to pass this week.
However, the vote sets up a conflict with the House that's likely to stall the bill.
The Senate bill includes $8.3 billion in tax breaks for small business.
The Democrats who sponsored the bill said were necessary to obtain Republican support.
See, they only have 51 votes over there, the Democrats.
They've got 50 because Tim Johnson's still in the hospital.
So you need 60 votes to pass anything, and they don't have it.
The Republicans run the Senate.
I don't care what anybody says.
If they've got the guts to, they can run the, the Republicans can stop anything in the Senate.
They have no power in the House.
Well, Senator Kennedy is beside himself over this still.
This is yesterday morning on the Florida Senate.
We see the great tragedy that we had down in Katrina, and we saw the attempts to rebuild Katrina.
What was the first thing the administration said?
Well, eliminate any coverage or protection for workers in terms of their wages down there.
Drive wages down even further in New Orleans.
What is it about people that in the construction industry, they average, I think it's $29,000 a year, construction.
$29,000 a year.
Too much for our Republican friends?
$10,000.
They don't want for a working person, man, woman, who's at the minimum wage, and they refuse to give some increase in that to $725.
Here you have the average construction at $28,000 a year, and you're saying that's too high.
That's too high.
Who's saying it's too high?
Nobody's saying it's too high.
You need to go talk to John Edwards.
You guys need to reallocate your own resources here rather than trying to spend everybody else's money, Senator.
He went on with this.
President Bush was first eliminated the first hearings that we had, I think, in our committee, was to eliminate the protections that have been recommended by President Clinton in the area of ergonomics, particularly affecting women that spend a great deal of time on computers.
Stop the Tafer.
What he is saying, I need to translate this for you.
He is saying that Bush wants to give workers, especially women, carpal tunnel syndrome, too.
He wants them to get it.
Others in the meatpacking industry, in the poultry industry, people that have repetitive kinds of procedures in terms of workers.
Protecting workers, hardworking, doing some of the most difficult work in America.
We did something, but oh no, the Republican leadership said, oh, no, we're not going to do that.
We're not going to provide for those protection for those workers.
So that's probably some of the most articulate debate that we had from the Senate Democrats.
Senator Kennedy, I wouldn't say he looks clean, looks thirsty to me.
Senator Kennedy looks more and more thirsty each time I get a gaze at him.
But they're just beside themselves over this because the Republicans have gotten in the way of the minimum wage increase by wanting tax breaks for the big business people.
Small business people are going to have to pay for it.
And this can happen on every piece of legislation if the Republicans hold together.
Patty in Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan.
Welcome to the EIB Network.
Hi.
Following that blowhole, Kennedy, I'd like to wish you World War II Company L, sleep number 45, and clean and articulate dittos to you, Russia.
Well.
Thank you very much.
Hang on, just Esther.
Stop talking in there.
She's doing a project and she won't listen.
All right.
Patty, I'm sorry.
Go ahead.
That's okay.
Before I ask my questions, old Rush, I'd like to tell you that yesterday I had the opportunity to talk to the infamous Mr. Snerdley, whom at one time I thought was an imaginary friend of yours.
Anyways, I must say that not only was he extremely nice, but he has a very sexy voice.
And I hope that one of these days he would consider sitting behind a golden EIB mic when you're on vacation.
I have to tear him away from it.
He's been begging to do that forever.
But I've never thought that he was articulate enough to host the program.
Oh, so he doesn't pass the clean and articulate test.
Yeah, right.
I'm sorry.
Well, cleanliness is okay on his part, but the articulation, that's a problem.
Which you know, you've spoken to him if you just admit it.
Well, he is.
He's very articulate.
It's a matter of judgment.
Well, I have good.
Let me get Biden's opinion on it, and then I'll decide.
Rush, if you don't mind, I have a two-part question for you, and I'll ask them one after the other and then get out of the way for you to respond.
And my first question is this: If the all-caring, morally superior Democrats are so concerned about the underprivileged and the downtrodden and illegal immigrants, why are they not concerned about the poor, the innocent, and oppressed civilians in Iraq who also need help and want a better way of life for themselves and their families?
And secondly, though it appears that many of the Democrats are personally and politically afraid of a U.S. victory in Iraq and would rather destroy our president at the expense of our country and our troops, do you think that if the Democrats were able to view the monies used to fund the war as more of a welfare-based program to help these destitute Iraqis, that they might be more inclined to support the war?
No.
No, they want the money to build votes in this country.
They don't care about the Iraqis.
The answer to your first question, they couldn't care less about the Iraqis.
They didn't care about the Iraqis when Saddam was slaughtering them.
Until the Iraqis get to vote in U.S. elections, the Democrats aren't going to care one way or the other about their lives.
I find that it's hard to believe it.
I mean, these are the all-caring, all-loving, all-concerned Democrats we're talking about.
Well, believe it.
It's not hard to believe at all once you understand them as I do.
And I know you understand what I'm saying.
You're just being facetious.
Yes, of course.
I'm sad to hear that, though.
No, you're not.
You're not sad to hear it.
You can't, because the expectation you have is not real.
You can't allow yourself to become sad over something that's not going to happen.
I guess I'm just the eternal optimist and am hoping and praying that it would hit them one of these days, what they're really doing.
Oh, they know what they're doing.
They know what they've been doing for years and years and years.
The solution to this is not changing the Democrats.
The solution to this is not changing the left.
The solution is defeating them.
The solution is not changing them, not getting along with them.
It's defeating them.
Which, of course, not enough of us cared about last November.
Priscilla in Medford, New Jersey, you're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Yeah, kind of like the caller before me took the wind out of my sails.
You haven't discussed the fact that the mantra of the Democrats, including the Speaker ed of the House, has been that we need to pull out because as long as we're there, the Iraqis won't step up and take responsibility for themselves.
And yet in this country, they seem to want to take, the government wants to take responsibility for everybody.
That is an interesting point.
You know, I was reading something just this morning.
I forget the late, it might have been Specter.
I think it was Specter, who may as well be a Democrat on this, who said, look, the longer we stay there, the less the Iraqis are going to step up and take care of themselves.
The longer we're in there, that's a conservative argument.
You can say the same thing too.
Well, what about Katrina?
What about New Orleans?
Let's pull out of there so the citizens of New Orleans stop waiting and start taking care of themselves.
Why don't we do that?
Why don't you Democrats pull out of everything where people have become dependent on you so that they can take care of themselves?
They're tripping up here.
That's, Priscilla, it's an excellent point, and I'm glad you called.
Speaking of pulling out.
We women of the United States have a very clear message for every single presidential candidate, including or especially Hillary Clinton.
And we women say pull out now.
Okay, time to hear from the first mainstream African American who is articulate, the first mainstream African American who is bright, and the first mainstream African American who is clean.
That would add a nice looking guy to boot.
That would be Barack Obama yesterday on the Senate floor, remarks on Iraq.
The need to bring this war to an end is here.
That's why today I'm introducing the Iraq War De-escalation Act of 2007.
This plan would not only place a cap on the number of troops in Iraq and stop the escalation, more importantly, it would begin a phased redeployment of U.S. forces with the goal of removing all U.S. combat forces from Iraq by March 31st, 2008, consistent with the expectations of the bipartisan Iraq study group that the president has so assiduously ignored.
By the way, I forgot to tell you people, I don't go to Washington much, but when I do go, sometimes I run down to the bar, the hotel where I stay, because you used to be able to smoke cigars in there.
But now you can't do that anyway.
It's a shame.
Now there's no reason to go there.
A bartender at this place tells me that he has gotten Chevas elbow from serving Senator Kennedy.
You know, I mean, Senator Kennedy probably has Chevas elbow and drinking, and he's a king of the Elbow Benders Club.
When a bartender tells you that he gets Chevas or cutty elbow serving, and I meant to mention this to you people.
Now, who are we talking about here?
Oh, yeah, Barack Obama got an Iraq plan.
We're going to get out when March 31st, 2008.
Why?
Isn't that convenient?
Just in time here for the presidential election of Democrats, he and Hillary to argue about who made it happen so that when they assume office in January of 2009, nobody will have any controversy on the plate.
Now, here is a man, and I've got a statement from obama.senate.gov.press.clean.articulate.070130.
And you would not believe a number of times the word responsible is used in this.
In the first paragraph, a new course for U.S. policy can bring a responsible end to the war.
The Obama plan offers a responsible yet effective alternative, bringing this war to a responsible end.
Obama said it's time for a policy that can bring a responsible end to this war and bring our troops home.
Ill-conceived escalation, but also sets a new course for U.S. policy in Iraq that can bring a responsible end to the war and bring our troops home.
The Obama plan offers a responsible yet effective alternative in bringing this war to a responsible end.
The word responsible is throughout this.
It's obviously been focus grouped and tested.
So here's a guy with absolutely no record decides to go on record with his first action being to insert his foot in his mouth.
He wants a responsible plan.
However, it's a nice word and it's a cute trick, but there is no one responsible except George W. Bush.
If we want to surrender to the car bombers and the beheaders, then Barack Obama is your man, along with Hillary Rodham Clinton and any, or most any other Democrat.
And by the way, along with surrender abroad, Obama would lower our defenses against terror here.
If you read the whole statement, what he wants to do, he wants to close Club Gitmo, and I've got a thriving merchandise business down there, and I will not stand for closing Club Gitmo.
He wants to end the NSA eavesdropping of foreign terrorists.
He wants to gut the Patriot Act.
He wants to extend due process rights to foreign terrorists.
Incredibly, he would also end the close vetting of Muslims seeking student visas here.
He has said in November 2005 that such careful vetting by American consuls abroad amounts to profiling and violates the civil liberties of the foreign visa applicants.
His pleasant demeanor masks a very dangerous man from the hate America far left.
Look at his votes, folks.
This guy is being cast about as a bright and articulate and clean mainstream African-American guy.
And he speaks these moderate words and phrases.
He is a liberal.
He is as far left as anybody, maybe including Kucinich.
He's as far left as anybody on the Democrat side is and can be.
He is a wolf in sheep's clothing, an articulate wolf, clean wolf, mainstream, good-looking wolf in sheep's clothing.
Anyway, that's what he said.
He's out there.
But you might say, Mr. Limbaugh, Mithril Limbaugh, he at Leaf have a plan, and you've been deriding a Democrat for not having a plan, Mithril Limbaugh.
Yeah.
But my problem with this plan is it's destined to lose.
We will be defeated.
That's a recipe for it, this plan is.
But the use of the word responsible so many times in this thing.
I mean, anybody remember the phrase peace with honor?
Richard Nixon, Vietnam, Peace With all these phrases we conjured up to make ourselves actually not confront the fact that we had lost and had given up.
That's all this is.
Anyway, quick timeout.
We'll be back and wrap it up right after this.
Oh, darn it.
I wish she had hung up.
We had a woman from Oklahoma City named Joy who wanted to say to me, I hope you got a lot of email about the show you did yesterday about the horse.
It was disgusting.
We offered to put her up next, and she bailed out.
Joy, if you're still out there, yours is the first complaint that I've gotten on the phones.
I got a couple of emails that thought it was disgusting, but the funniest thing that I ever heard.
There really weren't any complaints, Joy.
And we all loved it.
It was one of the most fun shows we've had all year.
▲
Export Selection