All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 31, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:20
January 31, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
The views expressed by the host uh on this program make more sense than anything anybody else out there happens to be saying.
And there is a reason.
Because I'm right.
And we uh we look for the Oh bars.
I thought I'd turn sorry, I thought I'd turn them on.
I really thought just turned back the picture for the ditto cameras out there.
Don't panic.
You ought to see the email I get it.
What are you doing in there when you turn the bars on?
I've got all kinds of suggestions and accusations being tossed at me by people who watch the program at Rushlimbaugh.com on the on the Ditto Cam.
I turn the bars on at the top of the hour break because there are things going on in here.
I you know, the th some of these three hours have to be private, folks.
It's a radio show.
Uh so I turn the bars on, people panicking over it's just not the same when you turn them by get real, folks.
There's nothing happening here.
The top of the hour breaks in, well, there is, but it's not for you to see.
Here's the number 800-282-2882.
All right, we've posted the picture of John Edwards' new estate, the 28,000 square foot main house.
By the way, and the and the and the and the barn that's where the basketball court is and the gym and everything.
Uh I have no quarrel.
I don't want anybody misunderstand.
I'm people can spend their money however they want.
With Edwards, this is a guy running around talking about the poverty-stricken circumstances that so many Americans endure in this country.
And how this country doesn't have opportunity for people, and he needs to be elected president to fix this old two America's gunk.
What I want you to notice in this picture is the clear cutting.
Take a look at the environmental destruction that took place to build this house.
Second thing I want to point out to you is on top of the barn, just just go to WW Rush Limbaugh.com.
We've we've posted the picture up there now.
If you look at the top of the barn, you will see what looks like a tower on top of the barn, or the red building, whatever it is in its barn.
Now, my theory, ladies and gentlemen, is that what Biden has done, he has clear cut this area, and I don't know how far the clear cutting goes, and he may not be through with the clear cutting.
He may be planning on building a runway that would handle a Boeing 747, such as Air Force One.
Or maybe a smaller version of Air Force One he could fly into, like a G-5 or a 757, a seven uh 737, whatever he's in would be Air Force One.
And that may be what the tower is for.
Sort of like a miniature air traffic control thing.
Uh if if if uh if not, he's gonna is obviously gonna have a helipad there so that Marine One can land as he's president and he can get back to his North Carolina White House.
If I'm wrong about this, this tower is just a security tower where marksman will be standing by, prepared to shoot anybody from the second America that dares try to get close to his estate.
Welcome back, folks.
Aren't you glad you're here?
By the way, one more global warming story.
Deep mountain snow usually drives mooses to seek lower ground in I know it's moose, but I want to be understood by people in Rio Linda.
Anyway, these the mooses uh seek lower ground in uh in Anchorage.
Deep mountain snow forces mooses to come closer to the city.
But the snow in Anchorage, Alaska, which is near where the earth is heating up to the point we're gonna lose the earth.
Near the Arctic Circle.
The snow is piling up in Anchorage this winter in record amounts, and it's a bit much even for the mooses.
So the mooses are going where they'd rather not go.
They are choosing major roads, plowed sidewalks, and groomed trails to sidestep the uh the snow in the neighborhoods in the green belts that uh left during a remarkably temperamental month in Alaska's largest city.
Uh the mooses weigh a half ton, and that's a thousand pounds.
They're even showing up downtown, uh placidly gnawing on bear trees at busy intersections.
They don't want to walk through the deep snow either, said state wildlife biologist Rick Sinnett.
Most mooses don't really want to interact with people in cars and dogs, but here they're not able to totally avoid them because the snow in Anchorage.
Now I thought that we had global warming and all this hot weather was causing the ice caps to melt up there and so no, no, no, no, no, but we got snow.
I mean, how can it be that the polar bears are dying because it's so hot where they are, and the mooses in Anchorage, Alaska are having to abandon their normal winter habitat for the city of Anchorage where there's even more snow?
Now you say, but this is an isolated example.
Folks, I'm just doing the same thing they do if if you have in the month of January, a temperature of 65 degrees in New York or Chicago, global warming, global warming, global warming.
Okay, I'll pick an American city where there's more snow than they've ever had, so much snow that the mooses are being forced out of their natural habitat.
Global warming, global warming isn't happening.
Global warming, global warming isn't happening.
Use the same logic they do.
If uh if an unusually warm day in the middle of winter in a northern city takes place is evidence of global warming, why can't I turn around and say record snow in a city of Anchorage causing mooses to relocate isn't evidence of global warming?
Why can I cherry pick individual weather incidents to prove my case?
Well, because Mr. Limbaugh, you can only cite one case where winter is unusedly, oh, yeah, take a look at the map today.
Nineteen degrees in Kansas City in snow, thirteen degrees in Denver, uh 34 degrees and falling in Dallas with freezing rain.
Dallas, Texas.
Guess what?
We went below freezing down here in the in central Florida a couple nights ago.
We are still five or six degrees below normal, and it's Super Bowl week.
Now it's going to be eighty and eighty-four and eighty-five on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, but on Sunday gonna be seventy-six down in Miami with some rain.
That's the forecast now.
So how can there be global warming?
We have freezing temperatures in California where the citrus crop was destroyed.
What, one billion dollars worth of citrus?
How come I can't point to that and say, well, it can't be global warming?
How could that if the world is warming up to the point of utter destruction?
If the world is warming up such a way that we're literally going to destroy the planet as we know it, how in the world?
Can it get so cold in Los Angeles?
How can it snow in Malibu?
Why can't I say global warming?
There can't possibly be any warming.
It's colder in Malibu than it's been 30 years.
The citrus crop in California ruined.
How come I can't say that?
Because it's just one or two examples of Mr. Limbaugh.
Uh so just take their technique, turn it right around on them, uh, my good buddies.
It's the same thing.
That's all they're doing.
I guarantee you, you know, back in 1979 or 74, whatever it was, Newsweek did this big cover story on global cooling in the coming ice age.
If since the mid-80s, the uh uh environmentalist wackos had been touting global cooling instead of global warming.
And if there had been this consistent drum beat, I'll guarantee what'll happen, what would have happened.
Every example of freezing cold weather would have been cited as evidence of it.
In the summertime where a coal front went through some town, uh clearing all the humidity out and say the temperature was 10 degrees below normal, which happens sometimes in certain warm climates in August, September.
They would have said, see, global cooling, global cooling.
Citrus crop being destroyed in California, cold temperatures in Florida this week, the snow and ice in Anchorage, Alaska, global cooling, global cooling, and everybody would believe that global cooling is taking place.
So it's all sham.
It's all a scam, and all it is is an effort to expand the role of the United Nations, and for poor countries to Get their hands in the pockets of rich countries, expand the role of government in people's lives, and to make you feel as guilty as you can about the way you're living your life because that's what's causing all these catastrophes,
so that in your guilt, you will be more readily agreeable to paying higher taxes, to replacing light bulbs in your house, doing all kinds of stupid, irrelevant thing.
Guess what the latest thing they've learned about ethanol is?
It creates more smog than gasoline.
So not only are we driving up the world price of corn, it's going to lead to riots in Mexico over the price of tortillas.
Not only are we raising the price of corn and the price of food thus around the world in third world countries, because we're taking so much of the corn selfishly and using it ourselves under the misguided premise that we are making the world cleaner produces more smog.
It's one of those little Oh, by the way, gang, there's a news story today.
By the way, um, you know, one we didn't tell you about.
Ethanol creates um more smog.
You keep you're just citing individual examples, Mr. Limboy, you refuse to see the truth.
They that's the voice, by the way, of the new Castrati.
The spineless, gutless, testicle-free wonders that rule the world these days.
Back in just a second.
Flash, flash bulletin, bulletin, bulletin, beep, beep, beep, beep, beep, whatever.
Just cleared, ladies and gentlemen.
This is from the Ottawa Globe and Mail.
Humans have already left such a deep footprint on the environment that the effects of global warming will last for the next one thousand years, according to the draft copy of a new report.
The Globe and Mail obtained an early version of the climate change study being prepared by the world's leading scientists, and reported that little doubt remains that the planet is getting hotter.
It says that human influence on the atmosphere during the 21st century alone will propel global warming for another one thousand years based on estimates of how long it'll take nature to clean the air of gases that contribute to climate change.
When the hell's that gonna happen?
What they mean is the next ice age.
Now, here we go again.
The weathermen of the world cannot predict weather for tomorrow.
I have been tracking this.
As you know, ladies and gentlemen, the Super Bowl is Sunday, Dolphin Stadium, kick off around 6:30.
The Chicago Bears and the Indianapolis Colts.
Well, I got some people, I've got some guests going to the game.
I uh I secured a suite at Dolphin Stadium, putting some clients and friends in there.
I am not going.
I got it for them.
So I've been very concerned about the weather for these people.
The Acuweather.
I can read the ex I can read these snerdling.
Well, I never heard about this.
He didn't invite me.
Did you want to go to the game?
No.
Oh, you won't you can't understand why I don't.
I've been.
This is for people who've not been.
Uh uh.
Uh I'm just, I'm just uh you know I can't I just can't.
I I besides I've got my little theater room with my big screen and so forth.
It's I want to watch the game.
I I don't want to be Yeah.
Uh this is an example of my generosity, snurtly.
This is uh anyway, well, don't get me sidetracked here.
So I'm hoping that the weather is okay.
We've had a great winter in South Florida.
Would you not agree?
We've our average temperature since well, I guess October has been in the eighties.
So Acuweather, the Acuweather site, forecasts weather for 15 days.
So, two weeks ago, I began checking the ACU weather site for weather on Super Bowl Sunday in Miami.
And 15 days ago, or whatever it was when it was uh two weeks from the game, first day I checked, the forecast for February 4th was for a massive cold front to sweep in Saturday night.
The high temperature was going to be 64 degrees, a low the night before the Super Bowl of something we're in the forties, and there was going to be wind and rain.
So I have a friend, a couple friends at work in the Super Bowl host committee.
And I said, Uh-oh, all the work you've been doing the past two years, look at what's going to happen Super Bowl Sunday.
And I sent him a forecast.
And I said, Don't worry.
I will guarantee you this is not right.
I will guarantee you this is going to change.
That forecast was the same the next day.
13 days away from the Super Bowl, totally different.
Super Bowl Sunday was going to be a high of 80, a low of 65, no chance of rain.
In just two days, the weather forecast for my, and I'm nothing against accueather.
I mean, I don't misunderstand this.
I'm talking about the science of predicting things.
Two-day range.
We had a high temperature forecast of 66 in rain, go up to 80 and no rain in 80 and uh and 65 at night with uh with sunshine.
And it has changed every day that I have looked at it.
It has gone from the high of eighty-two.
It is now currently rain in the daytime and 76 for an afternoon high, the low temperature, 60, the rain ends.
That's the forecast for Sunday in Miami.
It's different than any day previous to today.
Just two days ago, they were forecasting glorious sunshine, and who knows what the weather's gonna do.
We get closer to it, they'll be more accurate about the prediction.
My point is that here we in just in just a like a uh seven-day span, or eight or nine-day span, the forecast for Miami at the Super Bowl on Super Bowl Sunday has been all over the place.
Now we've got these jerks, these scientists telling us that global warming will last for 1,000 years.
That's probably 950 years longer than the war on terror is forecast to last.
Now, if you want to take this headline, global warming to last for 1,000 years, there's a positive way of looking at this.
The way I choose to look at life.
Great news.
Global warming only a temporary phenomenon because it's gonna end in a thousand years.
My friends, the the effort here to just make you feel so damn guilty so that you will acquiesce to the demands of the world's elitists and socialists to hire taxes to fix the problems you've caused and created knows no bounds now.
Global warming to last for 1,000 years.
I mean, you project this out long enough, and there's no one to know who's stupid, how stupid people are, once you start changing the predictions.
It is mindboggling.
You just keep in mind, and you can go to this ACU weather site yourself, and again, I don't want anybody calling Joe Bastardi up there and saying Limbaugh would dump it on you.
I'm not simply trying to illustrate.
I mean, they are they have a great reputation, and they take a great risk in putting a two-week weather forecast on a website.
It can do it for any city in the country.
A 15-day forecast is a huge risk.
People make travel plans based on this, whole bunch of things.
And it's just been all over the place.
It's been it's it's been erratic as it uh as it can be.
Uh let's see.
We got a quick phone call in here.
Michael in uh Piqua, Ohio.
Welcome to the EIB network, sir.
Great to have you with us.
Hey, what's going on, Rush?
It's a first-time caller.
Good.
Thank you.
Great to hear from you.
Man, Hugo Chavez.
Hear anything about this in the papers?
Take it over.
Uh, electricity, telecommunications, energy.
And he was greeted with open arms, I believe it was today or yesterday, by his people and mostly the supporters of his party.
I think all we're missing here is basically a little Heil Hitler.
Yeah.
If uh if they don't greet him with open arms and die, or they get put into a prison designed by Fidel Castro.
Uh Cesar Chavez a dictator.
He's what?
Hugo.
I keep getting these two guys confused.
Caesar Hugo.
Chavez is a chave is.
you know the guy's pretty clean.
I saw him at the United Nations make that speech, and he's very, very articulate.
Like Barack Obama is a clean black guy and an articulate black guy.
Hugo Chavez has the same characteristics.
But he's a dictator.
Nationalizing everything.
Big oil, phones, television shows, stations, networks, broadcast facilities.
There won't be very many more elections in that country.
And it's in the news, but it's it's the drug by media's not concerned about it.
They they love dictators like that.
They envy the power that these dictators.
I'm not kidding you.
They envy the Democrats, liberals envy the power these people have.
Chubb is not the enemy.
He's just trying to do the best he can for his people.
We'll be back.
Plus, Democrats love him.
Uh yes, a little tank Johnson music here, folks.
L. Rushball and the EIB.
Network.
800-282-288-2.
All right, here it is.
Uh this is from an interview that Senator Biden gave with the New York Observer.
I mean, you got the first sort of mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and nice looking guy.
That is uh Joe Biden in an interview uh uh with the New York Observer discussing uh the appearance of uh of Illinois Senator Barack Hussein Obama.
Uh articulate, bright, clean, nice looking guy.
First first mainstream African American who is no, not the first mainstream African American.
He is the first mainstream African American who is articulate.
He is the first mainstream African American who is bright.
He is the first mainstream African American who is clean.
He is the first mainstream African American who is a nice-looking guy.
I still don't see what all the hubbub's about.
And there really isn't any.
I mean, I remember MFNBC did the whole story on this, and he was on uh Good Morning America.
The drive-by's are not bringing this up.
They know it's no big deal.
Would have been a big deal if I said it.
Uh Senator Kennedy.
Upset, ladies and gentlemen, the Senate voted overwhelmingly yesterday to move ahead on a bill to increase the minimum wage, signaling the measure is likely to pass this week.
However, the vote sets up a conflict with the House that's likely to stall the bill.
The Senate bill includes $8.3 billion in tax breaks for small business.
The Democrats who sponsored the bill said were necessary to obtain Republican support.
See, they only have 51 votes over there, the Democrats.
They've got 50 because uh Jim uh Tim Johnson's still in the hospital.
So you need 60 votes to pass anything.
They don't have it.
The Republicans run the Senate.
I don't care what anybody says.
If they've got the guts to, they can run the Republicans can stop anything in the Senate.
They have no power in the House.
Well, Senator Kennedy is beside him self over this still.
This is yesterday morning on the Florida Senate.
We see the great tragedy that we had down in uh Katrina.
And we saw the attempts to uh rebuild Katrina.
What was the first thing the administration said?
Well, eliminate uh any coverage or protection for workers uh in terms of their wages down there, drive wages down even further in New Orleans.
What is it about?
People that uh in the uh construction industry, they average I think it's 29,000 a year construction.
Twenty-nine thousand dollars a year.
Too much for our Republican friends.
10,000 dollars.
Don't want to for uh a working person, man, woman who's at the minimum wage, and they refuse to give some increase in that to 725.
Here you have the average construction at $28,000 a year, and you're saying that's too high.
That's too high.
Who's saying it's too high?
Nobody's saying it's too high.
You need to go talk to John Edwards.
You guys need to reallocate your own resources here.
Rather than trying to spend everybody else's money, Senator.
He went on with this.
President Bush was first eliminated the first uh hearings uh that we had, I think, in our committee was to eliminate uh the protections that have been recommended by President Clinton in the area of ergonomics, particularly affecting women that spend a great deal of times on computers that affects safe.
What he is saying, I need to translate this for you.
He is saying that Bush wants to give workers, especially women, carpal tunnel syndrome, too.
He wants them to get it.
Uh others in the meatpacking industry and the poultry industry.
Uh people that have repetitive kinds of uh procedures uh in terms of uh workers.
But protecting workers, hard working, doing some of the most difficult work in America.
We did something.
But oh no, the Republican leadership said, oh no, we're not gonna do that.
We're not gonna provide for those protection for those workers.
So that's that's probably some of the most articulate debate uh that we had uh uh from the Senate Democrats.
Senator Kennedy, I wouldn't wouldn't say he looks clean, looks thirsty to me.
Senator Kennedy looks more and more thirsty uh each time I get a gaze at him.
But they're just beside themselves over this because the uh Republicans have gotten in the way of the minimum wage increase by wanting tax breaks for the big business people, small business people are gonna have to pay for it.
Um this can happen on every piece of legislation if the Republicans hold together.
Patty in uh Sault St. Marie, Michigan.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hi.
Following that blowhole Kennedy, I'd like to wish you um World War II Company L, sleep number 45 and clean and articulate ditto to you, Russia.
Well, thank you very much.
That's f Hang on just a second.
Sure.
Esther stop talking in there.
She's doing a project and she won't listen.
All right, uh Patty, I'm sorry, go ahead.
That's okay.
Uh before I ask my questions, old Rush, I'd like to tell you that yesterday I had the opportunity to talk to the infamous Mr. Snerdley, whom at one time I thought was an imaginary friend of yours.
Anyways, I must say that not only was he extremely nice, but he has a very sexy voice.
And I hope that one of these days he would consider sitting behind a golden EIB mic when you're on vacation.
I have to tear him away from it.
He's been begging to do that for I've never never thought that he was articulate enough uh to host the program.
Oh, so he doesn't pass pass the clean and articulate test.
Yeah, right.
I'm sorry.
Well, cleanliness is okay in his part, but uh the articulation that's a problem.
Which you know, you've spoken to him if you just admit it.
Well, he is he's very articulate.
It's a matter of judgment.
Well, I have good.
I need to get Biden's opinion on it, and then I'll I'll I'll decide.
Russia, um if you don't mind, I have uh two-part question for you, and I'll ask them one after the other and then get out of the way to for you to respond.
And my first question is this if the all-caring, morally superior Democrats are so concerned about the underprivileged and the downtrodden and illegal immigrants, why are they not concerned about the poor, the innocent, and oppressed civilians in Iraq who also need help and want a better way of life for themselves and their families?
And secondly, though it appears that many of the Democrats are uh personally and politically afraid of a U.S. victory in Iraq and would rather destroy our president at the expense of our country and our troops.
Do you think that if the Democrats were able to view the monies used to fund the war as more of a welfare-based program to help these destitute Iraqis, that they might be more inclined to support the war?
No.
No.
They want the money to build votes in this country.
They don't care about the Iraqis.
The answer to your first question, they couldn't care less about the Iraqis.
They didn't care about the Iraqis when Saddam was slaughtering them.
Until the Iraqis get to vote in U.S. elections, the Democrats aren't going to care one way or the other about their lives.
I find that it's hard to believe it.
I mean, he said the all-caring, all loving, um, all concerned, you know.
Uh Democrats were talking about.
Well, believe it.
It's it's not hard to believe at all once you understand them as I do.
And I know you understand what I'm saying.
Yeah.
You're just being facetious.
Yes, of course.
I'm sad to hear that, though.
That's the one.
No, you're not.
You don't you're not sad to hear it.
You can't you Because the expectation you have is not real.
You can't be allow yourself to become sad over something that's not going to happen.
I I guess I'm just the eternal optimist and am hoping and praying that you know that it would it would hit them one of these days, what they're really doing.
Oh, they know what they're doing, and they know what they've been doing for years and years and years.
The solution to this is not changing the Democrats.
The solution to this is not changing the left.
The solution is defeating them.
Not getting along with them.
It's defeating them.
Which, of course, not enough of us cared about last November.
Priscilla in uh in Medford, New Jersey.
You're next on the EIB network.
Hello.
Uh, yeah, kind of like the caller before me took the wind out of my sails.
My uh you haven't discussed uh the fact that the mantra of the Democrats, including uh the Speakerette of the House, has been that we need to pull out because as long as we're there, the uh Iraqis won't step up and take responsibility for themselves.
And yet in this country, uh they seem to want to take the government wants to take responsibility for everybody.
That is an interesting point.
You know, it uh I was reading something just this morning, I forget the late it might have been Spectre, I think it was Spectre, who may as well be a Democrat on this, who said, Look, we wait with the longer we stay there, the less the Iraqis are gonna step up and take care of themselves.
The longer we're in there, uh that's a conservative argument.
You can say the same thing too.
Well, what about Katrina?
What about New Orleans?
Let's pull out of there so the citizens of New Orleans stop waiting and start taking care of themselves.
Why don't we do that?
Why don't you Democrats pull out of everything where people have become dependent on you so that they can take care of themselves?
They're tripping up here.
Um that's that's uh it's an excellent point, and I'm glad you called.
Speaking of pulling out.
We women of the United States have a very clear message for every single presidential candidate, including or especially Hillary Clinton.
And we women say pull.
Ouch.
No.
Okay, time to hear from the um first mainstream African American who is articulate, the first mainstream African American who is bright, and the uh first mainstream African American who is clean.
Uh that would add a nice looking guy to boot.
That would be Barack Obama yesterday on the Senate floor.
Remarks on Iraq.
The need to bring this war to an end is here.
That's why today I'm introducing the Iraq War De-escalation act of 2007.
This plan would not only place a cap on the number of troops in Iraq and stop the escalation, more importantly, it would begin a phased redeployment of U.S. forces with the goal of removing all U.S. combat forces from Iraq by March 31st, 2008.
Consistent with the expectations of the bipartisan Iraq study group that the president has so assiduously ignored.
By the way, I forgot to tell you people, I've I I don't go to Washington much, but when I do go, sometimes I run down to the bar, the hotel where I stay, because you used to be able to smoke cigars in there.
But now they've you can't do that anyway.
Now there's no reason to go there.
A bartender at this place tells me that he has gotten Chevious Elbow from serving Senator Kennedy.
You know, I mean, Senator Kennedy probably has Chevus Elbow and drinking it.
He's a he's a king of the elbow benders club.
When a bartender tells you that he gets Chefus or Cutty Elbow serving.
And I meant to mention this to you people.
Now, who are we talking about here?
Oh, yeah, Barack Obama got an Iraq plan.
We're gonna get out when March 31st, 2008.
Why, isn't that convenient?
Uh Just just in just in time here for the presidential election of Democrats, he and Hillary to argue about who made it happen.
So that when they assume office uh in the January of 2009, nobody uh will have any controversy on the plate.
Now, here is a man, and I've got his statement from Obama.senate.gov.
Press dot clean dot articulate dot 070130.
And you would not believe a number of times the word responsible is used in this.
Uh in the first paragraph, a new course for U.S. policy can bring a responsible end to the war.
The Obama plan offers a responsible yet effective alternative.
Bringing this war to a responsible end.
Obama said it's time for a policy that can bring a responsible end to this war and bring our troops home.
Uh dip.
Ill-conceived escalation, but also sets a new course for U.S. policy in Iraq that can bring a responsible end to the war and bring our troops home.
The Obama plan offers a responsible yet effective alternative in bringing this war to a responsible end.
The word responsible is throughout this.
It's obviously been focused grouped and tested.
So here's a guy with absolutely no record, decides to go on record with his first action being to insert his foot in his mouth.
He wants a responsible plan.
However, it's a nice word and it's a cute trick.
But there is no one responsible except George W. Bush.
If we want to surrender to the car bombers and the beheaders, then Barack Obama is your man, along with Hillary Rodham Clinton and any or most any other Democrat.
And by the way, along with surrender abroad, Obama would lower our defenses against terror here.
If you read the whole statement, what he wants to do, he wants to close Club Gitmo, and I've got a thriving merchandise business down there, and I will not stand for closing Club Gitmo.
He wants to end the NSA eavesdropping of foreign terrorists.
He wants to gut the Patriot Act.
He wants to extend due process rights to foreign terrorists.
Incredibly, he would also end the close vetting of Muslims seeking student visas here.
He has said in November 2005 that such careful vetting by American consuls abroad amounts to profiling and violates the civil liberties of the foreign visa applicants.
His pleasant demeanor masks a very dangerous man from the hate America far left.
Look at his votes, folks.
This guy is being cast about as a bright and articulate and clean mainstream African American guy.
And uh and he speaks these moderate words and phrases.
He is a liberal.
He is as far left as anybody, maybe including Kucinich.
He's as far left as anybody on the Democrat side is and can be.
He is a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Articulate wolf.
Clean wolf.
Mainstream, good-looking wolf in sheep's clothing.
Anyway, that's what he is.
So he's he's out there.
Now, but you might say Mr. Limbaugh, Mr. Limbo, you uh he leaf had a plan, and you've been deriding a Democrat for not having a plan, Mr. Limbaugh.
Yeah.
But I my problem with this plan is it's destined to um lose.
Uh we will be defeated.
That's a recipe for it, this plan is.
But the use of the word responsible so many times in this thing.
I mean, anybody remember the phrase uh peace with honor?
Richard Nixon Vietnam, peace with all these phrases we conjured up to make ourselves actually not confront the fact that we had lost and had given up.
That's all this is.
Anyway, quick timeout, we'll be back and wrap it up right after this.
Ah, darn it, I wish she had hung up.
We had a uh woman from Oklahoma City named Joy who wanted to say to me, I hope you got a lot of email about the show you did yesterday about the horse.
It was disgusting.
We offered to put her up next, and she uh she uh bailed out.
Uh Joy, if you're still out there, I don't uh yours is the first complaint that uh I've gotten on the phones.
I got a couple of emails that thought it was disgusting, but the funniest thing that ever heard.
There really weren't any complaints, uh Joy.
And we all loved it.
It was one of the most fun shows we've had all year.
▲
Export Selection