All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 31, 2007 - Rush Limbaugh Program
34:17
January 31, 2007, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
We women of the United States have a very clear message for every single presidential candidate, including or especially Hillary Clinton.
And we women say, pull out now!
We've got to add that to the feminist update theme.
We're fierce, we're feminists, and we're in your face.
That's Code Pink, a code pink babe from Saturday's anti-war protest in Washington.
And again, still not sure she's talking about the troops with the pull-out now comment.
Greetings, my friends.
Welcome back, Rush Limbaugh, serving humanity, meeting and surpassing all audience expectations on a daily basis.
Telephone number if you'd like to be on the program is 800-282-2882.
And the email address is Rush at EIBNet.com.
Soundbites 18 and 19, Mike.
Nancy Pelosi, Fresh Sound here this afternoon on PMS NBC.
Chip Reed, the reporter, interviewed the Speaker of the House, and said, Explain to me why a non-binding resolution is strong medicine.
Any resolution that passes the Congress of the United States, disapproving of the actions of the President of the United States, binding or not, has great power.
So I wouldn't underestimate the power of a bipartisan resolution in disagreement with the president's actions in Iraq.
And then she had this to also say.
I hope that we can have a prayerful meeting with the president.
We're talking about the lives of now nearly 3,100 of our young men and women who have made the supreme sacrifice for our country.
How we go forward is very important.
We have a responsibility to support the troops.
Kaka, madam speaker, utter caca.
You do not support the troops by advocating their defeat.
You do not support the troops by putting them in a position where they cannot complete the mission, where they cannot win, and then claim you're doing it to honor them.
And you cannot at the same time honor these 3100 battle deaths or troop deaths, not all of them in combat.
By pulling the mission out now and making their loss meaningless.
Yet that is what they seek to do.
But do they really?
Where is the teeth of this resolution?
Let's defund it, Madam Speaker.
Let's defund the war.
Why don't you agree with Senator Feingold, who's trying to do that?
And he claims that he has precedent to do it.
He goes back to Vietnam, he goes back to Somalia.
And in fact, I did look into this.
And Congress does have, according to precedent, uh, it's it's somewhat murky, but they do have the ability to go back and amend a use of force amendment uh previously signed with the most recent one, 2002.
Uh and if if if fine gold can get the votes for it, they can go back and they can amend it.
They can say, no, we made a mistake.
Uh Republicans did this in um Somalia.
Uh Republicans in the Senate led by Strom Thurmond.
So it's not unprecedented.
It can happen.
But this business that the non-binding resolution will have power.
Look at if the American people are so on your side, madam speaker, defund it.
If the American people are so desperate for defeat, the American people want to get out of there and lose in such great numbers that you believe, then simply deny the president and the military the money to conduct further operations.
This is nothing more than a political hack making a political statement, attempting to gin up all of this anti-war fervor that does not exist in the numbers that she says or claims, trying to create that.
They cannot.
It's not only they can't afford a victory now, they can't permit it.
They are so invested in defeat if we defeat this insurgency.
And if there are great stories and articles and books written about the great comeback victory of the United States military and the hang tough president who stood in with them, they are dead For any position of national power in 2008.
They are dead and they know it, and that's why they want troops out.
They cannot, my friends, survive.
Think of this.
They cannot survive an American victory in this war.
Simply can't.
As to the 3100 deaths, once again, Madam Speaker, I only call your attention to Philadelphia.
406 homicides last year alone.
One American city.
Cities run by liberal Democrats and have been for years.
States run by liberal Democrats.
If you're concerned about death, if you're concerned about the loss of life, if that's all that this problem in Iraq means to you, that troops are being killed.
And don't tell me you care about the Iraqi people because you didn't care when they were being slaughtered under Saddam Hussein.
You didn't care to stop that.
So don't throw the Iraqi deaths in with this.
Let's just stick with U.S. troops.
You know damn well that this is you're just you're just against death.
You think it's meaningless here.
Well, add up all the homicides in this country.
Philadelphia, 406 last year in a city of one and a half million people, in a city where Donovan McNabb lives.
The articulate and clean Donovan McNabb actually lives in New Jersey, but he's the soul of Philadelphia, according to Dick uh Bill Roden of the New York Times.
And yet look at so Madam Pelosi, maybe you should call Senator Specter and say, Senator Spector, 406 citizens of Philadelphia were murdered last year.
It is the city you're from as you are the senator of the whole state of Pennsylvania.
Using Democrat logic, using the same battle plan to fight death.
We should cut off all federal funding for Philadelphia now.
We should establish benchmarks for the Philadelphia cops and the Philadelphia mayor to meet.
And if they don't meet those benchmarks by reducing the numbers of deaths, we need to pull all federal funding and all federal agencies, the FBI, customs, I don't care what it is, pull out of there.
It's untenable.
It's not worth the risk to federal agents to live in this city, nor any other American city with a homicide rate this high, and there are many of them.
I mean, 406 homicides in Philadelphia one year sounds to me like a civil war.
Sounds like you got insurgents and gangs that are running roughshod all over Philadelphia neighborhoods.
And we ought not be in the middle of it.
Get a resolution going.
Get Senator Specter on this.
This is uh this is obscene.
This is absurd.
Folks, you're gonna have to understand some of his whole Democrat position on Iraq is nothing but politics, and it's now become business, the business of politics, and that is the future of the Democrat Party.
They cannot allow, they cannot survive an American military victory in Iraq.
We'll be back.
Stay with us.
Cookie found little Mary Baby Fat Landrew from Louisiana on CNN.
Uh it was yesterday.
We would have been better off had the terrorists blown up our levies.
Maybe we'd have gotten more attention.
But we blew them up ourselves.
I mean, not literally.
And there you have it.
The uh the esteemed senator from Louisiana, Mary Baby Fat Land.
Now, the reason I would call her baby fat, I don't want it to be misunderstanding, I'm not pulling a Joe Biden here.
Uh, because she looks she's clean and she's uh, as you heard, very articulate.
Uh but I once said, and Cookie has never let me forget this.
I you know, Snerdley was making snide comments about Landry's hair one day.
I said, she looks kind of cute to me, and nobody could believe my taste.
This just has this you know uh like cute little baby fat.
And so everybody I get the soundbite, and I get the transcript.
The roster here says baby fat Landrew said this on here.
Listen to this again, though.
But uh this is how in the world does she think New Orleans didn't get any Attention.
There's a hundred and ten million or billion, whatever it is, dollars in Washington waiting to be distributed.
But but but uh Kathleen Blanco, the governor, and school bus Nagan uh cannot come to grips on how to use it or any of this.
But the idea that New Orleans didn't get any attention for crying out loud, the drive by media gave themselves Pulitzers for all of the networks set up bureaus in New Orleans.
We would have been better off had the terrorists blown up our levies.
Maybe we'd have gotten more attention.
But we blew them up ourselves.
I mean, not literally.
Blew them up ourselves.
Hurricane.
It was it was an American hurricane.
We blew them.
Actually, no, she may not know how right she is.
Because we all know of the fraud and the waste, and what was it?
The um what do you call it when you extort money from a project and put it in the back pocket of the people that run the levy boards?
Craft, fraud, extortion, theft, what have you?
Uh, and then you had the Corps of Engineers saying, yeah, we knew that uh those things didn't have a prayer in the category three hurricane.
Everybody was just rolling the dice that the big one wouldn't hit out of the email requests in droves by popular demand, ladies and gentlemen.
John Kerry sings.
Paul Shanklin has John Carey.
And I called America pariah.
From the old uh Broadway musical, Paint Your Wagon.
Back to the audio sound bites, drive by media panic over global warming.
This is NBC's Matt Wower and Andrea Mitchell and ABC's Sam Champion, all talking about global warming.
Now to a controversy in Washington over what literally could be the end of the world as we know it.
Did the Bush administration freeze out scientists trying to sound the alarm on global warming?
If nothing is done, temperatures will climb by the end of the century.
Sea levels will rise.
The snow cover will shrink.
Between 1.1 and 3.2 billion people will suffer from water shortage problems by 2080.
Now that's not your grandchildren.
That's your children.
And between 200 million and 600 million more people will be going hungry.
I'll tell you, they're getting desperate now because people are not buying into this.
Matt Lauer, in one of the most irresponsible statements on network news that could be the literally be the end of the world as we know it.
Be the end of the world as we know it.
All right, so we have our global warming stack today.
First up, Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada.
Once called the Kyoto Accord a socialist scheme designed to suck money out of rich countries, according to a letter leaked yesterday by Canada's liberals.
The letter posted on the Federal Liberal Party website was apparently written by Harper in 2002 when he was leader of the now defunct Canadian Alliance Party.
He was writing to party supporters asking for money as he preferred to uh fight the then Prime Minister Jean Chrtien on the proposed Kyoto Accord.
We're gearing up now for the biggest struggle our party has faced since you entrusted me with the leadership.
I'm talking about the Battle of Kyoto, our campaign to block the job-killing economy destroying Kyoto Accord.
He's right, and he is now the Prime Minister of Canada.
In Los Angeles, Los Angeles County cannot ban the use of trans fat in restaurants because it lacks the authority to do so according to legal advisors.
What a bummer.
And what a shock, ladies and gentlemen.
A government body constrained in some way in California.
Legal beagles telling a government body it doesn't have the authority to do something.
Don't believe it.
The County Council told public health officials that neither a trans fat ban nor a requirement restaurants display nutritional information on the menus would be possible under current state law.
The state has jurisdiction in such matters.
Fearing that young models strutting down the runways in New York City are too skinny, a lawmaker says there should be weight standards.
Bronx State Assemblyman Jose Rivera wants to create a state advisory board to recommend standards and guidelines for the employment of child performers and models under the age of 18 to prevent eating disorders.
Yep.
A law will stop that.
AIDS to Rivera knew of no other similar bill nationwide aimed at the fashion and entertainment industries.
Isn't this what we want of our elected leaders?
There are homicides in New York, in the Bronx, all over the city.
There's murder taking place left and right, just like there is in Philadelphia.
And here is this clown wanting a law to ensure healthy fashion models.
As you know, the Super Bowl is Sunday, right down the road here.
It's in Davy, Florida, which is where Dolphin Stadium is.
The National Football League is hoping to tackle some of the heat-trapping gas emissions that will emerge from the game itself.
And from all the traffic arriving, the limos, the buses, the cars, all of the cooking that will be going on.
The National Football League is worried about gas emissions that will lead to global warming or contribute to it.
And they have got a problem and they have got a solution.
They are going to plant 3,000 mangroves and other trees native to Florida.
However, the plan could be more of an incomplete pass and a touchdown when it comes to global warming, according to experts.
Probably a nice thing to do, but planting trees is not a quantitative solution to the real problem, said a climate scientist at the Carnegie Institution at Stanford University.
The NFL began planting the trees in August.
They will finish in May.
This year's Super Bowl, of course, features the Chicago Bears, the Indianapolis Colts.
I support the Bears, but I wish they weren't there.
I wish it was the Saints.
I'm just kidding.
Just support the Bears, but wish they weren't there.
Um sport the troops, but pull them out.
So the NFL, if if nothing else, what does this story tell you?
3,000 trees to combat global warming, the global warming effects of a Super Bowl football game.
I mean, shouldn't the NFL be planting 3,000 trees at every NFL stadium every year?
All of the heat trapping emissions from a football game?
If this doesn't tell you that this whole thing is ridiculously political.
And here's the NFL just trying to score some good old boy points.
3,000.
We've got enough trees in Florida for crying out.
We're got trees all over the place, and they're gorgeous.
I don't, it's that's not that we don't need any more.
It is absurd.
It's an insult to the average person's intelligence.
And if you have above average intelligence as I do, it's really insulting.
By the way, I don't have time.
You know that road closure they were going to have to rebuild a seawall down here?
They had to get it done by April 30th so as to get it done before the turtles showed up.
They canceled the project.
Well, they've delayed it until further notice.
Nobody seems to know why.
Nobody seems to know why.
Do you see what President Bush did today?
He delivered a speech on the economy at Wall Street and then walked the trading floor in the middle of the day.
I don't think that's ever been done.
I don't think a sitting president has ever walked the trading floor in the middle of a trading day, and all these guys are stopping, and he got a great, great reception.
There's one his autographed to shaking his hands, or his hand, it's uh like a mob scene down there.
And I know what's going on.
President just wants to meet somebody at Citigroup so we can get on the corporate jet the next time Maria Barcheromo is on it.
The money honey.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network.
More global warming idiocy here before we get back to the phone calls.
This it really is getting absurd now.
As uh somebody somebody recently said Dr. John Christie was making speech recently.
I don't know who Dr. John Christie is.
But I know that he's got a brain.
Because Dr. John Christie said, we care so much about the environment we would do anything except take a science course.
Get this.
On Thursday evening, tomorrow night, as scientists and officials put finishing touches on a long-awaited report about global warming.
The Eiffel Tower Will switch off its 20,000 flashing light bulbs that run up and down the tower and illuminate the French Capitol skyline.
The Eiffel Tower's lights account for about 9% of the monument's total energy consumption of 7,000 megawatt hours per year.
The five-minute blackout comes at the urging of environmentalist wackos, seeking to call attention to energy waste.
And just hours before the world scientists on Friday unveil a major report warning the planet will keep getting warmer and presenting new evidence of humans' role in climate change.
It will be a consensus, which of course means there can be no science.
You can't have both.
Consensus cannot create science.
It cannot proclaim it.
It's just a bunch of people with the same political point of view agreeing with each other and using their propagandist buddies in the drive-by media to drive home the point that you and I and all the developed nations in the world are destroying the planet.
So they're going to turn off the lights of the Eiffel Tower for five minutes.
The NFL is going to plant 3,000 mango trees, all to stop global warming.
3,000 mango trees to deal with the carbon footprint that will be created as a result of the Super Bowl on Sunday.
California Senator Henry Nostralitis Waxman, Democrat chairman of the House panel examining the government's response to climate change, said yesterday there is evidence that senior Bush administration officials sought repeatedly to mislead the public by injecting doubt into the science of global warming.
They've inject doubt.
They've got scientists who doubt it.
The whole premise of this makes Bush and the administration sound like a bunch of criminals.
Mislead the public?
You think maybe the global warming alarmists are misleading the public?
Couple new books out by global warming scientists.
Yeah, the world's warming up.
It happens.
It's cyclical.
It's related to sunspot activity and so forth.
No case can be made for human activity.
You've got a bunch of scientists who are always ignored.
Who say there's no man-made factor here.
This is bigger than us.
It's bigger than we are.
It's happening maybe, but it's nothing we can do about it.
We didn't cause it.
It's gotten so out of whack room.
We had this story about the uh the grade school up in the state of Washington that uh wanted to show Al Gore's propaganda movie, an inconvenient truth.
And one of the parents, you gotta show both sides of this.
So the school said, okay, and they stopped showing a movie while they took the issue under advisement.
Uh and it ended up with the parent who was portrayed as a wacko nutcase Christian when this was all over being the problem.
So the Al Gore side of the world simply cannot allow opposition.
Same thing with liberals everywhere, folks.
They simply cannot permit people who disagree with them to be heard.
That's what the fairness doctrine is all about.
That's what political correctness is all about.
They don't care to debate because they can't win.
They just want to silence their opponents.
Finally, in this list of silliness, a California lawmaker wants to make his state the first state to ban incandescent light bulbs.
Conventional light bulbs, as part of California's groundbreaking initiatives to reduce energy use and greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.
The how many legislators does it take to change a light bulb act?
It's actually the name of the legislation, would ban incandescent light bulbs by 2012 in favor of energy-saving compact fluorescent light bulbs, which French want to communicate.
Incandescent bulbs first developed almost 125 years ago, and for it Thomas Edison should be stripped of any honor that he has been bestowed.
I'm going to go ahead.
Thomas Edison, major contributor to global warming and pollution.
You know who's behind this?
This is Lori David.
Remember, she was on the View, she was on Oprah, and she's running around with these light bulbs, and she's telling Everybody.
She's the activist wife of a comedian.
And she's got a book out.
And of course it'll be heralded with the drive-by.
Change the light bulbs.
Unplug your toaster when you're not using it.
Unplug the microwave.
I mean, don't use bury the card.
Don't use toilet paper, just go out and get some leaves.
These are actual suggestions from twelve years ago from environmentalist wackos to save the environment.
All right, people have been patiently waiting.
Let's now head back to the phones.
St. Louis and Joe.
You're next, sir.
Hello.
You know, Rush, I don't know if you saw pictures of uh John Edwards' estate out there.
Yeah, I saw it.
But it looks to me like he clear cut, and I mean absolutely flattened about a hundred acres of woods around his estate.
I know, it does.
It it it it looks like there was a nuclear blast there, and then he built a house.
It looks like it looks like a Walmart parking lot surrounding his estate, and then you see these giant woods and trees, and you can see right where they just clear cut, they just destroyed it.
Now you think anybody will notice that besides you and I?
Yeah, I've had some people email me about it.
Uh, and I've only seen one picture of it, and I can't well website people can find it.
We've need to put a picture up there because we can't describe it effectively.
But you have come as close as anybody I have heard.
But the thing is, Walmart parking lots are paved.
This literally looks like it's it's worse than clear cutting.
I mean, it's it it it it they've just leveled the environment all around this house, and it looks like it's out in the middle of nowhere, which it is.
He's got a long winding road.
You can't get to this if John Edwards doesn't want you getting to it.
And you know what's gonna happen with the fluorescent light bulbs?
Same thing that happened with the toilets.
Instead of using one flush, you use three flushes now.
Instead of using one fluorescent light bulb, people will be using three and four fluorescent light bulbs to do what one incandescent type.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's exactly right.
You're exactly you know what people are doing.
You go on eBay, go simply you can buy these old toilets that have the uh three and four gallons in them instead of the one and a half.
You can't old toilets are grandfathered, you can you can uh legally put them in.
Yeah, these are uh compact fluorescent light bulbs, they're not just fluorescence, these are compact fluorescent light bulbs, uh authored here and promoted by Laurie David.
But that's a good point.
You're gonna need a whole lot more of them and uh and your toilet.
Plus, you know what people have done also with the uh with the toilet problem, in addition to certain prisons now having to point them to Mecca.
Uh so Islamic prisoners don't have to insult religion by using the toilet while pointing in the wrong direction.
Uh wonder what kind of Islamic law they violated to get in prison in the first place.
Anyway, I'm sorry, side point.
Uh now you can go out and you have these vacuum things, these uh toilets that uh hit the button vacuum because you know he's right.
A gallon and a half or whatever, they don't handle it.
You do have to something f flush the toilet three or four times and they get stuffed up, plugged up and all this sort of thing.
So now you have these vacuum things or motorized or whatever.
You let one of those things blow up on you, you've got water all over the bathroom or a busted pipe.
Doesn't happen much.
Uh but yeah, this is the this is uh a great example.
Glad you called.
Here's Frank, Tampa, Florida, your next sir on the EIB network.
Let's uh back up to Russ Feingart for a second.
He seems to be confused about something, and and uh so do you, by the way.
He seems to think that just because a lot of Americans and a lot of Republicans have lost uh faith in the judgment of this president and think that the troop search in Iraq is a misguided policy, even though we want it to succeed.
He he seems to think that that's an indication that we want to pull out immediately.
Well, we still we just don't agree with all the mistakes that this president has made up to this point, kind of lost confidence in his ability and his judgment.
Wait a minute.
How why are you lumping me in with Feingold here?
No, because you have been saying that everybody who who doesn't support the president's policy is a cut and letter, a coward that that would defeat us, that we want to lose, but that's not it at all.
We want to win.
We just don't think the Bush has got the stuff to win.
Uh sorry, not good enough.
Not good enough.
You don't believe me.
No, I don't know.
It's not that I totally believe you.
I just don't think your logic, your reasoning makes any sense.
Well, he's been wrong about everything up to this point.
Why should we believe that this is the best course forward?
I think that there's other strategies out there that would work better.
Anything about war.
Do you know how many times mistakes are made in World War II or any war that have to be overcome?
It's not something that goes perfectly from day one till the end.
There are constant mistakes.
Lincoln had to get rid of a bunch of generals until he found U.S. Grant.
The point is you stick with the program and you stick it out.
If Bush can't win the war, and there's no Democrat willing to fight it, then what the hell are you talking about?
Nothing.
Half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
Rush Limbaugh, America's real anchor man.
Fearless, tough, unyielding, effective, kind, patient, tolerant, and compassionate.
A harmless, lovable little fuzzball.
Serving humanity here, 800-282-2882.
If you're just joining us, ladies and gentlemen, and if you uh especially if you're a welfare recipient of just getting up, Senator Barack Obama was described this way by Senator Joe Biden in the New York Observer.
Quote Joe Biden.
I mean, you got the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice looking guy.
I mean, that's a storybook, man.
But I recall hearing a word from Barack about a plan or a tactic.
You know, and and my point here is what's what's the big deal?
What's so wrong about this?
I mean, I just watched uh MSNBC do a story on this, and they didn't even mention uh the fact that uh he's an African American who's articulate and clean.
I mean, this is folks, I don't understand, I don't even see what's wrong with this.
Um MSNBC clearly doesn't see anything wrong with it.
They didn't even mention it.
I mean, it caused a little hubbub earlier in the day, but I I knew it wasn't gonna cause much of a hubbub because you know what what's so bad about it?
What what what is what's the big deal?
Uh back to the phones, uh Bob in suburban Philadelphia.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Good afternoon, Rush.
Hey.
I'm wondering if you stole that line from Neil Kennick uh like he did before, Mr. Biden.
So uh I don't know if Neil Kennick uh is he still around?
Well, maybe he's speaking from the grave.
I don't I don't know, but Biden uh is pretty shifty, and maybe somebody ought to check where he actually got that from.
Uh this is a pretty good line, I have to admit.
I'd like to point out that Arlon Specter uh not only lives in the city of Philadelphia, but was the district attorney there in the late 60s.
So if there's going to be any concern of anybody, it should be from him directly, since he not only lives in the city, but uh knows firsthand the kind of kind of activity that's going on in the North and West sections of everybody knows what's going on in Philadelphia.
Everybody, the families of the 406 people that died last year.
Well, Mr. Spector should concern himself with it uh directly if he's so concerned about other areas.
Well, that's my point.
I mean, but Senator Spector's worried about what's going on in Baghdad, meanwhile, we had 821 uh troop deaths, not all in combat last year in uh in Iraq, whole country, and 406 in Philadelphia.
Uh let's start you don't want to add up how many we had in other major cities like Miami, Detroit, uh uh New York, Chicago.
See the my my my point with this is the Democrats and the and the and these these cowardly Republicans who are joining sides with them here on this uh on this resolution business.
And by the way, Spectre's getting frustrated all the resolutions.
He says there are resolutions are falling like here snowflakes.
Um and this may be a plan, you know, just paper the House and the Senate with resolution after resolution after resolution so that not one of them gets a majority vote.
And make it look like a circus, which it is.
But they're all basing this need to redeploy and get the troops out of there on the fact that they're dying.
They're dying, ladies and gentlemen.
Troops, troops in a war are dying.
Which and at 3,000, whatever it is, 3,030 of them in uh four years.
Less than a thousand a year.
This is pretty pretty I mean, battlefield cat uh fatalities are at an all-time low, particularly in this war.
So they're not concerned about anything other than they're dying, the troops are dying.
We've got to get the troops out.
The troops have to come home.
If they just hate Bush, it's all about hatred for Bush.
Republican side, too.
They a bunch of wimps think that they're going to go down the tubes if they don't distance themselves from Bush.
Typical, gutless, linguini-spined politicians, don't care what party, typical behavior.
It's all about death, Mr. Limbo, they're dying.
Well, soldiers dying in a war zone is one thing.
But citizens in a civilized American city.
Being murdered at the rate of 4060 years, speaking of Philadelphia.
Philadelphians are dying, Senator Specter.
In one city, we lose half as many American citizens, innocent lives, as troops dead, not all on the battlefield either, in Iraq.
Where's the concern for the dying in Philadelphia?
Where's the concern for the dying in Detroit, Chicago, Miami, Houston, Dallas, New York, Boston, take your pick?
Where is the concern for the death and the dying?
Where are the resolutions?
Where are the demands that we train local security forces to deal with this?
Where are the threats from our great fearless leaders in Washington to get out?
I'm sure we got military installations in many of these cities.
Our troops are at risk in our major cities.
We have National Guard members.
We have reservists in all these cities.
They are at risk.
Senator Spector, in your hometown.
Have you no concern for the possibility they might die on the streets of Philadelphia?
You see how bogus this whole argument is on get the troops out now because they're dying for nothing.
What an insult to them.
It just frosts me, folks.
Fuming here, boiling over.
Good time to take a commercial timeout.
Hey, Coco, I want you to post that picture of John Edwards' estate with all the clear cutting.
I want you to post it on a website now, because I have figured out why all that clear cutting was part of his construction.
Wait till you see this, folks.
▲
Export Selection