All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 4, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:19
October 4, 2006, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yes, and we're back.
Broadcast Excellence.
Rush Limbaugh, the Excellence in Broadcasting Network, the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
I am your host, Rush Limbaugh, highly trained broadcast specialist with countless hours and years broadcast experience, showing the rest how it's done from the EIB Southern Command.
Our phone number, if you want to be on the program, 800-282-2882, it's the email address, rush at EIBnet.com.
Well, I just got the special edition October issue of the Limbaugh Letter Hot Off the Press as the editor and publisher.
I get the first copy.
If you're a subscriber, yours is in the mail.
And it's 28 pages.
We do this now and then, expand the issue.
We have some advertising support in it, but that is a great issue.
Issue has an interview with Lynn Swan, a candidate for governor in Pennsylvania.
By the way, you may have seen this.
There's a Kansas church group that plans on protesting at the funeral for the five slain Amish girls in Pennsylvania.
And I saw that and I said, what is a Kansas church group going to protest the funeral for?
So I went and dug deep out there, trying to find out.
I learned that Fast Eddie Rendell, the governor of Pennsylvania, at some point insulted the church group in Kansas.
I don't know.
Do you know what he said or when?
Do you know when it was?
I have no clue what he said or when, but the Kansas church group is going to go there and protest at the funeral.
I don't think they're going to protest the funeral.
Are they going to protest at the funeral?
Are they protesting the funeral?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
They're going to protest at the funeral to protest Fast Eddie Rendell.
Fast Eddie, by the way, was asked about beefing up screw security.
Fast Eddie said, well, these random acts of violence like this, somebody wants to take their own life or get killed in the process of committing something like this.
You can't stop them.
And you could put 50 Secret Service agents around the president.
If somebody really wanted to take the president out, willing to die to do it, and nothing you could do to stop it.
Did you notice that Fast Eddie did not say, hey, if you wanted to take out the governor of Pennsylvania, you could put 50 Pennsylvania state troopers around me.
And if somebody wanted to take me out and was willing to die in the process, they could probably get away with it.
Did not use himself in the example.
Anyway, the October issue of the Limbaugh Letter features me as Uncle Sam on the cover, the Fear America issue.
And in addition to the Lynn Swan piece, a couple of great commentaries, essays in here.
And this is so, folks, this is going to come in so handy for you.
You won't be able to see this on the DittoCam.
I'm holding it up.
But what this is, is a graphic of the Congress from Hell.
All of the committees being chaired by the Democrats who will ascend to the chairmanship.
Nancy Pelosi as the speaker.
John Murtha as the majority.
Although that opponent of his, Diana Erie in Pennsylvania, has pulled within 10 points of Murtha.
That's still a formidable lead that Mirtha has, but the momentum is with her.
Then you've got Charlie Wrangell on two committees, the Ways and Means Committee and the Joint Committee on Taxation.
You've got Henry Nostralitis Waxman, Waxman on government reform, Barney Frank on financial services.
It's there.
Some great funny quotes who said it.
The top 10 Bush scares, the top 10 global warning scares, the top 10 medical scares, the top 10 scarce studies, the top 10 scarcity scares.
Remember, it's the fear issue.
This is how Democrats are trying to make everybody scared to death of being alive in the United States today because of Republicans.
Even the top 10 rush scares, the top 10 efforts by Drive-By Media to scare people about me.
Like Time magazine, is Rush Limbaugh good for America?
And then the little comedy piece at the end, Witches Brew, all of these Democrats stirring up this green pot of goo that equals impeachment.
So it's out.
It will be in your mailbox very soon, the October issue of the Limbaugh letter.
Now, I mentioned earlier in the program that we're nearing the magical 300 million mark in the American population.
Now, it was just 39 years ago, ladies and gentlemen, that the population of America totaled 200 million.
But we're getting close to 300 million.
It'll happen sometime this month, according to the Census Bureau.
There are only two countries with higher headcounts, the Chikoms, and, you know, they're over a billion.
I mean, they could stand a lose 800 or so, and a war wouldn't matter to them.
And India.
India has a huge population as well.
All this got me to thinking, 300 million, where would we be if the liberals weren't aborting themselves and their future generations?
I don't know what, well, a million and a half since 1973.
Figure most of those are Democrats, liberals.
73, well, it's a size of 28, 30 million people, maybe more.
So that many fewer liberals.
So it's, you know, it's sort of a, gee, I'm not sure I'm opposed to this kind of thing.
I have to stop thinking.
I mean, if there's going to be abortion, why not liberals?
But anyway, with our population growing, the Center for Environment and Population.
And these clowns, I think all they've done is gone out and just rehashed Paul Ehrlich's population bomb.
The Center for Environment, which has been totally discredited.
They released a new report echoing all these unhappy factoids we've been hearing from the left for years.
For example, we Americans use three times more water than the world average.
So we're probably cleaner.
And if you travel internationally, you'll find out exactly what I'm talking about.
Over half of the wetlands in America have been lost due to development and agriculture.
Oh, we're back to this, the wetlands issue.
You property rights owners, property owners and property rights advocates in the West, I'm sure, could give us evidence of what BS this is.
How much property have you had taken away from you in terms of your freedom to use it because it's been claimed to be a wetland simply because after it rained, there was some standing water a couple of places on your property.
They also say that half of the continental United States cannot support its original vegetation.
That is, there is more forested land in America today, including all these forest fires, than there was at the time of the founding.
Can't support, but for crying out loud, original vegetation.
So what?
Even if it were true, so what?
We're all still breathing.
What's the purpose of vegetation?
Photosynthesis so that carbon monoxide is exchanged into oxygen so we can all breathe.
And, you know, you can get by with a five-square-foot plot of grass in your front yard to accomplish all the photosynthesis you need without even a tree being in the neighborhood.
About 85% of the animals and plants on the endangered or threatened list are there because we wrecked their natural habitat.
No, 85% of the animals and plants on the endangered or threatened list are there because the environmentalist wackos working with liberals in government bureaucracies have simply claimed that they are endangered or threatened to deprive private property owners of developing their own land, i.e. farmers and a kangaroo rat in Bakersfield, California, the snail darter, ants, you name it.
Some of the absolute dregs of the animal world are on this list purely and simply to deny capitalism from taking place.
And here's this one's this one is the this has been around ever since I've been paying attention to things.
We consume nearly a quarter of the world's energy, though we're only 5% of the world's population.
What do we do with that energy?
Even if you accept this, and I'm not sure that I do, but even let's just accept it for the heck of it.
What do we do with that energy?
Do we not use it to produce?
Do we not use it to create and invent so that when there is a natural disaster from Iran to the tsunami or earthquake somewhere, the first nation on the scene to help clean up and to provide food is the United States because we have the energy and the ability, the technical know-how, and the advanced civilization to get there and do it.
Oh, also this report says that you people are polluters.
You produce a lot of garbage, five pounds a day.
Americans produce five pounds a day of garbage, which is five times more than unselfish people in developing countries produce.
This is just absolute garbage.
Life in many of these third world countries is garbage.
The homes and the villages they live in are absolute garbage because they don't have the technical know-how to clean up their messes.
This is the, anyway, I mean, you get the drift here.
Once again, America and capitalism are the evil of the modern existence of humanity.
And now, with 300 million of us, well, there's going to be even more garbage.
And we're going to be sucking even more of the world's resources, selfishly gobbling them up while causing the real people of the world to live lives of squalor.
Let me remind all of you, my fellow water-abusing, species-killing, gas-guzzling.
By the way, have you seen this?
Sales of SUVs and pickup trucks are picking up again with the falling gas price.
Yes!
Yes, mom.
Way to go, America.
I'm proud of you.
We Americans have brought more freedom and prosperity and cleanliness to the world than any other nation in history.
So if we're producing five pounds of garbage, let's make it 10.
Take this stupid report from the Center for Environment and Population, call it garbage, and throw it on the land heap and turn it into something nice like a golf course.
That's what you do with landfill.
You dredge something, you turn it into a golf course.
Talk about the photosynthesis on a golf course.
Talk about the native vegetation on a golf course.
Talk about all these things that happen.
Meanwhile, as to this number 300 million, what we ought to do is have a lottery.
Need to have, well, not a lottery, not really a lottery.
We just, you know, when McDonald's gives some prize to the person that buys the one billionth quarter pounder, we ought to have something, put a counter down there on the border.
And whoever the 300th million American is, by virtue of crossing the border illegally, gets automatic free citizenship for life for himself or herself and every kid he produces or has produced for the rest of his life.
Free Social Security, free Medicare, free health care, free car, free house, free beach house, you know, a thousand hours a year at net jets.
Let's just really celebrate what it is to be an American.
Oh, and also give the guy five million or five pounds of garbage as he crosses the border so that he can join America and polluting the country.
From the where have we heard this before department?
Unless Social Security and Medicare are revamped, the massive burden from retiring baby boomers will place major strains on the nation's budget and the economy, said the Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke today.
Reform of our unsustainable entitlement program should be a priority, he said in prepared remarks to the Economics Club of Washington.
The imperative to undertake reform earlier rather than later is great.
Well, we did.
We tried this.
The president tried this shortly after he began his second term, but there were some obstructionists out there who once again played the fear card on Medicare and Social Security recipients, i.e., America's seasoned citizens, and told them that Bush wanted to steal their money and give it to Wall Street investors.
Every effort that has been made to reform these programs is met with strict obstruction by the Democrats.
This is going to happen if nothing is done.
There is no question that a rising tax rate of unbearable heights will descend upon workers, employees, who are just now starting out in the workforce.
And you know who these people are?
They have grown up and they have seen all this prosperity on Beverly Hills 90210.
And they think that when they get out of college, they should have the $400,000, hell, $500,000 house, three cars in the garage, bank account 401k.
That's how you start.
And they get mad when they learn that that's not the case.
When they find out that they are never, ever going to assume that kind of prosperity because their tax rate's going to be 70%.
They will just stop working and say, you know what?
I want my Social Security now.
That's how I'll live.
And pretty soon, nobody's going to be around to pay it.
If something isn't done, efforts have been made.
Democrats stand in the way.
They stand in the way of victory in the war in Iraq.
They stand in the way of victory in the war on terror.
They stand in the way of economic prosperity.
They stand in the way of peace.
They stand in the way of a responsible judiciary.
They stand in the way of virtually everything that would improve the country while at the same time trying to make as many Americans as possible believe that the greatest days of America are behind us.
It's doom and gloom in the apocalypse ahead.
Here's Chris in Dallas as we go to the phones.
Welcome.
Nice to have you with us, sir.
Yes, sir.
It's an absolute honor to speak with you today, Russ.
Thank you very much.
I appreciate that.
Yes, sir.
I just wanted to bring an observation to you and see what you thought about it.
It seems like there's a little strategy swapping going on.
It seemed like all the enemies of America are basically quoting the Democrats side of our Ramadinijah to Zawahiri to Zarcawi.
Of course, he's dead now.
But it seems that though.
Don't leave out, don't, don't, don't leave out Hugo Chavez.
Absolutely.
I mean, we still smell sulfur today.
But anyway, it seems that with their inability to win in the battle of the arena of ideas, it seems that they're kind of switching their strategy in the form of IEDs in the form of IMs in order to, like you said, suppress the conservative vote like they did in Iraq right before the election.
So basically, you're saying Democrats are domestic terrorists.
To an extent, almost their own form of political terrorism.
I mean, obviously, they can't send out car bombs, but, you know, why not suppress both their way?
Well, maybe not car bombs, but drive-by media bombs.
I mean, that's exactly what they're doing.
Well, that's why we call it the drive-by media.
They drop in, they fire a bunch of cameras and microphones into the American population, get everybody all scared, create an absolute total mess based on bilge and drivel, and head back into convertible head on down the highway, waiting for the next group of Americans to drop the bomb on.
That's not a bad analogy.
It is sort of funny whenever you hear...
I mean, this latest tape from Al-Zawahiri talking about Bush lied.
Bush better come clean with the American people about the lie he told to get people into Iraq.
Right out of the Democratic talking points.
Hey, you can't blame these guys, essentially, because they watch CNN in their cave or whatever.
And they think that's an accurate picture of America and what the American people think.
And they know full well how to use the media.
Any friend of the Democrats, any enemy of Bush, rather, be the friend of the Democrats.
And that's why Democrats in the media herald, whatever it is, Al-Zawahiri or Zakawi or Hugo Chavez or Ahmadinejad happen to say.
Aaron, Chico, California, welcome, sir.
Thanks for waiting.
Rush, Mega Sierra Nevada, did those.
Thank you.
I'm kind of worried here because as we're getting close to this election and, you know, pretty much everything that the president has done with tax cuts has done nothing but help the economy.
I mean, between 9-1-1, Katrina, the war on terror and everything, I mean, even look at the economy today.
I mean, we just surpassed a record of all time through everything, through everything we've done through the gas pipeline up in Alaska.
And I guarantee, once, I mean, if the Democrats get in office, watch companies just pull back because they know their taxes are going to go up and you're going to see everything start to go down.
And I live in California, obviously.
And it's just, it's bad enough as it is.
And if they start raising taxes, it's just going to be ridiculous.
And no one's going to want to invest in anything.
No one's going to want to buy property.
Make no mistake, they're going to try.
They're going to have to get President Bush to sign their tax bills if they win the House and get the Senate to go along with them.
But they are going to try.
There's no question that your fears are justified.
That's a pretty good explanation of how robust things are, too.
Cutting edge of societal evolution.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network.
All right, as I said moments ago, I finally figured out what everybody, these two guys are in a race to say they were the or are the father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby.
When I first saw this, and it's up there is breaking news that the next, some new guy said, I'm the father.
I'm the, well, what the hell?
Who cares anyway?
Why is it news?
What's the big deal?
And then I did a little research at the top of the hour break, and I found out that I actually knew this, just forgot it, that Anna Nicole Smith could end up, if the court case goes their way, with something like 400 some-odd million bucks.
So then it all became clear.
We've got a bunch of free-loading men out there trying to get in on a big pile of cash without having worked for it.
This embarrasses me as a man that that would be the reason.
And of course, these guys are saying, no, I love her.
Fine, fine.
We expect you to say that.
But we all know it's the money.
Follow the money.
You'll always find the answer to most everything.
But it just offends me as a man that guys would get in a race to claim something.
One of them's obviously lying, and they both may be.
Who the hell knows?
$400 and some odd million dollars.
And if they think they're going to see any of it, been there, done that.
All right.
Democrats lead in races for 11 of 15 crucial Republican-held House seats a month before the November elections, putting them within reach of seizing control of the chamber, according to Reuters Zogby.
Poll data released today.
Hold it a minute.
Democrats lead in races for 11 of 15 crucial, putting them within reach of seizing.
I thought the polls already had them seizing control.
I thought the election was over.
You notice what's happening here.
For the past six months, we've been told no contest.
The Democrats win.
The Democrats take over.
Speaker to be Pelosi, Pelosi, whatever.
They're going to win big.
Now, all of a sudden, the news is, hey, Democrats are getting close.
Democrats.
I thought last week when something happened, that they were getting close.
The week before that, when whatever the dribble-drabble scandal of the week was, they were getting close.
So now the press template is that the Foley scandal is what's putting them close.
The polls taken September 25th to October 2nd in 15 of the most competitive House districts across the country overlapped by three days.
The sex scandal involving Mark Foley's explicit internet messages to teenage male congressional pages.
Zogby said, hey, it's not just Mark Foley, but also what did this speaker know and when did he know it?
This could turn into a free fall for Republicans.
I just refuse to believe this.
I'm not doubting the results of the poll.
I just refuse to believe that Denny Hastert figures into this.
Anyway, oil has dropped below $59 a barrel.
Waiting for them to say that this has something to do with the Foley story.
I can figure a couple ways where it might be.
Anyway, this has prompted OPEC to call for supply cuts.
This has been when OPEC, when the price was going way, way up, over $70 a barrel, they'd call OPEC.
OPEC's our hands are tied.
We can't do anything about it.
You can't flood the market with oil and get this price down a more reasonable.
No, no, we're a max output.
We can't do anything about it.
Now that the price is plummeting, OPEC somehow has the ability to tighten supplies.
Here is Bob in Madison, Georgia.
Bob, nice to have you on the program and welcome.
Sleep number dittos, Rush.
Thank you.
Reflecting on the behavior of the drive-Wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
Wait a minute.
Wait, wait, what is your sleep number?
50.
50?
Yes.
Wow, mine's 75.
Well, it depends.
If I work out and I strain my back a little bit, it goes down to 40, but usually around 50.
Wow.
Okay, we're talking about the select comfort sleep number bed.
How long have you had yours?
About five years now.
Wow.
You're getting close to me.
I've had one for 10.
And, well, I learned about it from you, and it is absolutely awesome.
I'm glad to hear that.
Now, I didn't mean to interrupt you, but I had to ask you what your number was.
That's okay.
First things first.
Reflecting on the behavior of the drive-by media in the coverage of the Mark Foley situation and the George Allen situation, it brought home a stark realization for me.
Voters need to stop and think for a second that this election is also a referendum on whether voters approve of the sophistry, the double standards, and the hypocrisy being flaunted by the drive-by media.
This election is not just an opportunity to vote for candidates, but it's also a chance for voters to indicate whether they accept or reject the tawdry tactics the drive-by media continues to employ to alter the psychology of the moderate and conservative voters.
You know, I appreciate what you're saying, and I would hope that the anger at the media is a factor.
I know that there's rage and there's anger at the media, but unfortunately, they're not on the ballot in a specific way.
I mean, now, obviously, candidates are on the ballot if you're angry at the way the media is overreacting to everything.
George Allen, for example, and you're Republican, you vote for George Allen.
We can only assume that some of the Allen vote, he wins, is directed at the media.
Exit polling data might show us some of that, but don't misunderstand.
I'm just, I don't know how productive it would be to get people to go out there and vote against the media.
Well, it's a sense.
I mean, look what the media is doing in the sense that they are getting conservative voters to question whether they're even going to vote at all, or they're getting conservative voters to say that they are going to cast a protest vote.
Well, if you really stop and think about it, you know, those types of votes, whether it's you don't participate at all or a protest vote is cast, it has a lingering effect long after this election.
If you go back to 2002, for example, and think of the tactics that, I mean, excuse me, 2004, and think of the tactics that they employed there, what it really did, you know, when certain of their favorite candidates won, it emboldened the press to continue to use their tactics.
Because they thought that, well...
But wait, but wait, but the press, even when they lose, the press doesn't change their tactics.
When they lose, they don't.
I think it works to our benefit.
I'm not disagreeing with you that it'll work to our benefit.
I'm just saying it might be difficult.
And I'm saying this strictly with my political scientist cap on.
It's going to be difficult after the election to say media contributed to the Democrats loss or the media contributed to the Republican win, however you want to phrase it.
I have no doubt that there are millions of Americans outraged.
But I think most of the outrage actually goes to Democrats.
The media are willing accomplices.
It all helps.
But when you have a Republican win, I guarantee you what will happen.
Let's go back to 2004.
This is sort of funny.
In fact, when you look at it within the context of current events, after the loss in 2004, which the Democrats were sure they were going to win, the exit polling indicated that there was a lot of attention on values.
And everybody was stumped because no candidate had really campaigned on values.
Well, the media missed what the values are.
The Bush campaign was talking values every day.
I just didn't use the word.
Talking about the values of American exceptionalism, victory over enemies who are terrorists, maintaining the promise to make tax cuts permanent.
Democrats assume values because they don't understand the concept strictly revolve around morality and the feared Christian right.
So we had, in the first week after the election, the media asking, what do Democrats have to do to connect with values voters?
And then the Democrats came out and gave us the answer.
We need to go out there in those blue states and we need to have religious outreach.
Problem is, we're not religious, but we've got to find a way to do it anyway.
And then shortly after that, the template began.
What do the Democrats have to do to win in 06?
And for two years, all we've had, what do Democrats need to do to win in 06?
Every news story has that as the political prism through which it passes.
The war in Iraq, the war on terror, the Abu Ghrab story, the Korans in the Kamod at Klub Gitmo.
I don't care what the story, for two years, the prism through which it's been presented is how will this affect the Republicans and the president in the midterm elections in 06?
Nothing will change if they lose this time.
Now, I do think this, nothing's going to change the media.
The Democrats and the media just get angrier, and it's going to get even worse.
There might be rioting this time around if the Democrats lose.
Some of these left-wing blogs may not be able to contain themselves.
And they're already setting the stage.
The drive-by media is already running stories about how, yeah, voting machine problems out there.
I saw a story the other day how easy it is to hack a voting machine.
You can screw an election in 60 minutes if you know what you're doing, hacking a series of voting machines in a specific precinct or county.
Well, they're setting the stage for if they lose, once again, they had it stolen from them and cheated, and that's just going to rile their base up, and they're going to get livid, and there's going to be all kinds of hell to pay.
And then they'll start again.
What do Democrats have to win in 08?
How does this affect the Democrats' chance to win the White House in 08?
Here's one of the things that's driving the media and the Democrats right now.
The next two elections are make it or break it for the Clintons and their control over the Democratic Party.
And this is why I have been saying to you that every one of these drib-drab little scandals for the past four weeks is coming to us from the Clinton war room.
They have control over this party.
They have wrested control.
They can tell Andrew Cromo, you're not running this year, pal.
They can say to Bob Torricelli, you're not running this year, pal.
They can go back to Cuomo says, okay, pal, you've done well.
You're back in.
You're going to run for attorney general, whatever the hell it is in New York.
And Torch, if you play your cards right, we'll make you a lobbyist.
They are still running this show, but they got to win in November.
This stuff has to work in November, and they've got to win in 08.
If Hillary does not win the presidency in 08 and don't believe all this rasmataz that she's not going to run and she's going to opt for the Senate and be there as the majority leader, don't believe that.
This is all about power and it's all about control.
They've got whatever dirt they have on any Democrat to keep them loyal and to keep them quiet.
That's why there are no leaks from the Clinton administration.
They've got dirt on all these people.
Those 500 FBI files were not just all Republicans.
Nobody will ever convince me they were.
And so, but they've got two more elections to do it.
If they lose in 06, Democrats lose in 06, with the Clinton war room running the operation, if they lose in 08, if Hillary doesn't win the nomination, doesn't win the White House, at that point, the Democrats can say, okay, you guys are out.
You've had your time.
And they know it.
Now, they won't go easily.
But the untold story is all of the power struggles going on within the Democratic Marty.
Hell, look at Murthy.
He's already running for House Majority Leader before they've even won the election.
He's trying to ace out Stanley Hoyer, who is right now Nancy Pelosi's deputy.
Murtha's got to win reelection first, but he's thinking this is in the bag.
There are a number of Democrats vying for power in certain areas.
Madeline Albright has her little foreign policy consultancy business out there.
She would really benefit with Democrats in power.
So she's loyal to the Clinton war room and so forth.
But folks, there's so much more going on here than what you know.
And that's why all of this about Foley and Hastert resigning just really bums me out when our side falls for this stuff, knowing full well it's all manufactured to cause exactly what's happening.
Frisier and faction, Fissure and Fraction in the Republican Party.
I got to take a break as I'm a little long.
We'll be back in just a second.
Stay with us.
I get it now.
At Kansas, church group is that bunch of wackos that goes around protesting at soldiers' funerals, too.
All right.
That's just a bunch of kooks.
And they just cancel it because of the heat that's been brought to bear against them.
The Kansas church group has canceled the protest at the funeral for the slain Amish girls.
Ladies and gentlemen, can I just tell you how it's going to be in this election?
I get so sick and tired.
I got people writing me, Rush, it's over.
Why don't you just realize it's over?
We appreciate you trying to be positive and we appreciate you trying to buck us up.
Come on, Rush.
The Republicans don't deserve to be reelected.
Even without the Foley scandal, the Republicans haven't done anything or said anything is going to make people want to go vote for them.
So why don't you just open up?
Why don't you try Rush instead of trying to use phony optimism to keep everybody up?
Why don't you just come clean and tell us what you really think?
You know that the Democrats are going to win this.
All right, you want truth?
You want the truth?
I'll give you the truth.
I think the Republicans not only hold the House, I think are going to pick up 40 or 50 seats.
Now, you ought to see I'm on the other side of the glass here, folks.
Even Brian is going agog in there.
Well, let me tell you how I arrive at this calculation.
Bertley's in there shaking his head.
If you believe the liberals, and 40% of Americans do, I mean, by simple statistical analysis, if you believe the liberals, you have to believe the Republicans will not only hold the House, they'll pick up 40 to 50 seats, maybe 30, but I mean, it's going to be a sizable pickup for the Republicans.
I know you're saying, how?
Have I lost my marbles?
I know what you're thinking.
You're thinking I'm just doing all this because I'm mad that so many of you are writing me and telling me to get real and get honest and tell everybody that we're going to lose it.
I'm just telling you what I really think.
The liberals know, and they've told us since 2000, that Republicans steal elections.
Now, if the Republicans can steal the presidency, as they did in 2000, and as they stole the presidency in 2004 by monkeying around in Florida and in Ohio, and if they're smart enough to get the liberals' hopes up with phony exit polls in 2004 showing that John Kerry is going to win, and Republicans are that crafty, if they're that good at cheating,
if the Republicans can go out there and literally monkey around with voting machines and rightfully steal, I'm sorry, steal what is rightfully a Democrat victory.
If you can steal a presidency, folks, stealing 40 or 50 House seats is a piece of cake.
You just have to go into a certain number of small districts and do your dirty work in there.
Stealing a presidential race is huge.
So if I were a liberal and I were listening to liberal commentators, the drive-by media, Democrats, and the blogs, either since 2000 or 2004, I would stay home.
It's not worth the effort.
The Republicans are going to steal the election anyway.
So while all this talk is going on that the Democrats are close now in 11 of 15 hotly contested districts, and while the Senate is now actually in play, it's balderdash, it's falderall.
According to the liberals themselves, the Republicans will do what it takes to steal the election.
They've done it in 2000.
They did it in 2002.
I mean, they did it in 2004.
Why are they not going to steal this one?
Fastest three hours in media.
We're already through with two of them.
We have one more big hour to go featuring your phone calls and some halfway decent audio soundbites.
But I have to tell you, everything's Foley.
That's all anybody in Washington is talking about is this Foley and Hastard business.
But we will find a way to muddle through, folks.
▲
Export Selection