MSNBC doing this GOP gas conspiracy story, and I got a Wall Street Journal reporter on the talk.
My golly.
I I just I I I'm dumbfounded.
I just I don't know where they go to get these stupid people to participate in these polls.
I guess they it's not hard to find Democrats.
Americans look for political manipulation and gasoline prices plunge.
And not even a majority of Americans do, but the headline makes it sound like the whole country's suspicious and unhappy that gas prices are going down.
It's absurd.
This is a Democrat campaign effort.
And it is a silly greetings, welcome back.
Rush Limbaugh, the EIB network, excellence in broadcasting, Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
This is the largest free education institution in the free or oppressed world.
Ladies and gentlemen, I am sitting in the prestigious and distinguished Attila the Hun chair here at the Institute.
The institute happens to be wherever I am.
There are no graduates, there are no degrees, the learning never stops.
Want to be on the program 800-282-288-2.
Victor Davis Hansen at Pajamas Media.com, Wars Then and Now.
The Hate America Industry.
When bin Laden praised William Blum's book, Rogue State, it soared to the top of Amazon's sales charts.
So too has the Noam Chomsky hegemony or survival, as soon as the semi-literate Hugo Chavez held it up at the United Nations.
The left sees it as McCarthy like to even suggest that our own are the ideological godheads of the enemy, but it is true.
Hansen writes, I'm going through the rough draft of a new Al-Qaeda reader this morning, translated and edited by Raymond Ibrahim, soon to be released by Doubleday.
What do Dr. Eamon al-Zawahiri and bin Laden complain about from their caves in Pakistan in their new pamphlet, little book, whatever?
Get this.
The latest Al-Qaeda reader features this.
The American failure to sign Kyoto.
Our desecration of the environment.
George Bush reading a goat story on the morning of 9-11.
Halliburton.
And that critically important concern of radical Islam, the lack of campaign finance reform in the United States.
This is actually in what in their latest literary release to the world.
Much of their rants are simply jottings and notes taken from watching Fahrenheit 9-11 and killing time in hideouts by listening to the talking heads on CNN.
That's all fine and good in a free society, but there are two concerns other than the abject hypocrisy of these comfortable prenatal Americans kicking at their own embryo.
A tenured Chomsky who thrives in pleasant, secure surrounds, makes a living through secure air travel, is paid by a university rich in Pentagon contracts, can rant only on the surety that what he sees in the abstract is evil and so must end, won't quite fall apart in the concrete.
Anyway, he goes on to uh talk about the writings of people like Chomsky and others, but for a terrorist to read from these American intellectuals that the U.S. is the greatest source of terror in the world is not to begin a conversation, but to embolden them even further to try ending America altogether.
Now that that was the point of a previous caller.
Uh the leak from the national intelligence estimate, which says that we have made terrorism worse after 9-11, we have made the country less safe.
Victor Davis Hansen's point is just the opposite.
That when Doomkoffs like Noam Chomsky write their anti-American screeds and they're held up by people like Hugo Chavez, these idiotic terrorists get hold of it, and they use that to defame America all over the world and help their recruiting.
It is exactly what the caller said.
Liberal Democrats, the American left, have done far more to build up terrorists.
Hell, even some Republicans.
John McCain, Lindsay Graham, the Al-Qaeda Bill of Rights.
Oh, speaking of that, speaking of the Al-Qaeda Bill of Rights.
What did I do?
What did I oh?
Folks, I have to apologize.
You know, back when we saw the first pictures of Abu Graeb, I said, it looks to me like your average university hazing.
And I have to apologize for that.
Um a story here from Tallahassee, Florida.
Marcus Jones said he had a ruptured eardrum and injuries to his buttocks.
That would be but for those of you in Rio Linda, required twenty-five stitches after his initiation into the Kappa Alpha Psi fraternity at Florida AM University.
He told his parents that for four days he was blindfolded, paddled with wooden canes, punched with boxing gloves.
He knew the initiation would be an ordeal, but he had no idea it would amount to torture.
Jones, a sophomore, wanted to keep the February incident quiet, but his father called a cops.
They charged five fraternity brothers under a new Florida law that makes hazing a felony if it results in serious bodily injury or death.
Possible penalties range from probation to five years in prison.
Hazing is a legal oddity.
The victim has essentially agreed to the ordeal in advance, with no knowledge of what the specific initiation rights are, it can amount to consensual assault, humiliation is often part of the process.
Some fraternities and sororities are notorious for violence and copious drinking of alcohol and adult beverages during initiations.
These young men are found guilty if they're sent to jail, then it'll have national implications, said Pennsylvania Judge Mitch Crane, anti-hazing advocate who's been following this case.
Lawyer Chuck Hobbs, who represents all the defendants except one, said he would present evidence that Jones failed to identify who hit him during the hazing.
At any rate, the bottom line is hazing, uh, at least at Florida AM University, is far worse than uh most of what we saw at Abu Grabe.
I mean, my gosh, 25 stitches in your butt, a ruptured eardrum.
Legal charges.
I mean, that I've I have to, folks, I, you know, I I I mischaracterized uh what was going on at Abu Ghrab, apparently, because real hazing is far worse.
And so I I know that my comments offended a lot of people when I said, hey, it looks like your average university hazing to me.
Um, but in fact, the university hazing far worse than what went on at uh at Abu Ghrab.
Uh you know, I don't like to put a lot of stock and credence in polls, as you know, this one's interesting.
This is CNN poll.
If it's true, uh, and I happen to think that it is, it will have powerful ramifications.
Terrorism and the Iraq war will play very important roles in the votes of a large majority of Americans when they go to vote in November.
On terrorism, 49% of the 1,009 respondents to the survey conducted by opinion research corporation said it would be extremely important in deciding their congressional choices in November.
Thirty-three percent said terrorism was very important.
14% said it was moderately important.
Asked which party in Congress would better handle specific issues.
Respondents backed Republicans on terrorism, 4741, while Democrats were again seen as better able to handle the economy, 5139, health care and immigration and moral issues like same-sex marriage and uh stem cell research, which right off of the gameplay, like they gave you the game plan a moment ago.
Gay marriage, health care, integrate, all of these things, but the the interesting thing about this poll, ladies and gentlemen, is that the people in the poll are are more are more um likely to think that terrorism and Iraq are the same thing now, which has not been the case in the past.
The Democrats have done their best to split and divide those and make terrorism one issue, the war on terror, and the war in Iraq separate issues.
And according to this poll, the American people don't quite see it that way.
Now, as I say, I'm I'm dubious of polls.
My suspicion is that the polling data that we have seen up to now that says that the American people split the two has been what's bogus.
Uh I I it's like the myth that there was total unity on 9-11 and for a week afterwards.
Well, there wasn't.
There wasn't unity in this country about that, and uh, and even on that day, and this there's so many premises that I think are advanced by drive-by media in their polls and editorials and so forth over the course of a year, um, that people just accept.
I don't think that most people have ever really separated the war on terror and the war in Iraq as being totally unrelated and unconnected.
And this poll indicates that that is something new now.
Uh that there they are connected.
I don't think it's new.
Quick time out.
We'll have some audio sound bites of uh Clinton associates, Carville, and the forehead defending what uh Clinton did on Fox News Sunday.
You know, I I don't know if they if they're if they like what they're getting, what they bargained for, but this video is everywhere, and it's continually being played, and I don't care how you look at this, is snerdily said to me during the break.
You know what?
It could well be that one man in 20 minutes has done what the Democrats took a whole auditorium full of people in four hours to do in 2002.
Bill Clinton may have provided a Democrats Well Stone Memorial in one interview on Fox News Sunday this past weekend.
Back in a second.
I want to tell you what we've been doing here during the break, uh, ladies and gentlemen.
Those of you watching on the Ditto Cam have been able to see this.
I was looking again at this story from uh Tallahassee about Marcus Jones, uh, who was haze and abused and even tortured during his initiation into the Kappa Alpha Psi fraternity at Florida AM University, ruptured eardrum and uh injuries to his buttocks that required 25 stitches.
I have sent this story and a question to Senators McCain, Graham, and Warner, wanting to know if Marcus Jones at Florida AM University is covered by the Geneva Conventions under uh common Article III uh uh uh about dignity and then whatever whatever else it says.
I want to get a uh clear uh uh answer on this, because clearly what happened to Marcus Jones at worst is what's going on at Club Gitmo or Abu Ghraib, and based on that, I'm thinking we might want to just close down Abu Ghraib.
Well, we have, we've turned it over to the Iraq.
Close down Club Gitmo, even though I have a a thriving merchandise business associated with a resort.
Uh sounds to me like sending uh these 14 al-Qaeda bigwigs to the Kappa Alpha Sci fraternity at Florida AM might actually be a wise and productive thing to do, uh, given the type of torture they meet out up there.
So we're looking into both of these.
An AP News Flash, ladies and gentlemen, House Democrats have asked for a rare closed session to discuss intelligence on terrorism.
No, could this be that the House Democrats have asked for a rare closed session to discuss the declassified national intelligence estimate?
Could it be that if that is the case that what is prompting this request for a rare closed session might be panic?
Yes, love it.
All right, to the phones, Bob in Baytown, Texas.
Thanks for waiting, sir.
You are on the EIB network.
Super giga dittoes from the subatomic molecular structure of my being.
You sound like Harry Reed.
No, not hardly.
Uh I'm uh to paraphrase Jonathan Winners, I'm my it.
Uh I I want these I want whoever is leaking this material, this classified sensitive material that's vital to the security of my nation.
I want them prosecuted and punished to the full extent of the law.
Somewhere in the chain of custody is the division head, a department head, somebody who knows who had access to this material and who to go see and say.
Tell me what happened, bud.
I I I know this.
I spent 12 years in the Coast Guard.
I I'll come from a career military family, and that is normal operating procedure in the military and in the the government structures of this country.
It's there for our protection.
And I I don't care about the politics of it.
Let me tell you something.
Joy join the uh join the club out there, Bob.
A lot of people are irritated and angry about this.
I think based on what I saw at the press conference today, the president Bush is.
And, you know, look, administrations deal with leaks all the time and finding the leakers is a very difficult thing to do.
It's a shame they have to release this whole document, to tell you the truth.
They have to, they've got no choice.
They can't let this lie stand.
They can't let the troops' morale be uh negatively impacted here.
They've got to release this.
In addition, releasing it will show just how the traitors who leaked this are embraced by the Democrat Party.
Make no mistake.
The House Democrats who are asking for a closed session to review this are scared to death.
I'm hoping this is what this is.
They are scared to death that they have willingly embraced without questioning trade.
And it may well be that your rights may well be that if once they see it, they may think they've been snookered again by Carl Rove.
We'll just have to see.
Negroponte is going to declassify this this afternoon.
He'll release it on a website, and we'll know the details then.
But as I say, we've got this website with a former spook, intelligence figure for 20 years, who has seen portions of it, and they give a completely different and opposite picture than the one lone element leaked to the New York Times.
David St. Ignatius...
What is this?
Wyoming?
Months.
Yes.
Hi, welcome to the program.
Nice to have you with us.
Hi, Rush.
What a treat.
Been listening to you for 20 years.
Thank you, sir.
Hey, last night during the football game, there was a JF opened up the new Superdome, and we're showing off how good New Orleans was doing.
And uh trying to really boost up the morale of the city.
And then oh I lost my notes.
Um, this happens to callers now and then.
This is why I often uh uh suggest that turning the program over to amateurs is a risky thing.
Um, but are you?
Well, let me let me help out there.
Were you upset at the commentary during the game about uh how much hasn't been done in New Orleans?
Is that where you were going?
That is exactly right.
Harry Conick Jr. got on, and they've been building houses and and doing this and doing that, and saying we need we need uh people to come back to New Orleans.
We need we need uh the people to come watch the games and uh to come to conferences and and remember what a great place New Orleans was.
And then and then um Spike Lee comes on and says how pitiful it is that not enough's been done, and they show pictures of Hey, look, let me let me take her on.
I don't have a whole lot of time here, but I was prepared for this.
I thought we'd get a call on this today, and I must tell you I I watched the game last night a little bit.
I had a very important secret meeting.
Um I didn't get to see the entire game.
I missed some of the beginning.
But I as soon as I tuned in, who do I see but Spike Lee in the booth, being asked questions as though he's an expert on social policy and everything else.
And I listened to a little bit of it, and I kept saying, It's a football game.
Couldn't you have done this in the pregame show?
And I find out they did.
They devoted a lot of time in the pregame show.
It was pure politics in the booth at ESPN last night, and it was pure liberal politics, disguised as social compassion and can give us the game, guys.
I'm getting sick of all these shots of the fans and the crowds and and and the shots that take us away from the field.
It would it's it's no different than if you're at the game and a bunch of drunks in a row in front of you stand up and you can't see what's going on the field.
That's what these networks are like.
I don't want to hear Spike Lee when I'm watching the Atlanta Falcons and the Saints.
I don't care.
He got his HBO document.
Doesn't matter to me.
This ain't a social welfare concern show.
I know that there might have been some pressure brought by the NFL.
We gotta make New Orleans look good, and we've got to make sure that people understand still a lot of work to do here and so forth.
But it got so syrupy and milk toast that I was about to puke.
It's a football game.
And football announcers I thought were not supposed to delve into politics.
Where did I hear that once?
But did politics we get all over the place?
And we got liberal and how rotten and horrible.
You may think Bourbon Street looks good, but we had to go on a tour of all these areas of New Orleans that are still dilapidated and unrepaired.
All well and good, except if you're gonna do that, ESPN, tell us the truth about why, instead of leading everybody to the false impression that there's one entity and one entity alone responsible for it, i.e.
the Bush administration, even though it wasn't specifically stated.
When you get Spike Lee in there after that documentary did on HBO, you kind of get the flavor of we the guys are headed and what they're thinking.
The idea the federal government doesn't care, that theme reverberated well, but you stand by because I have the truth about what's wrong down there.
And note to drive by media and Democrats on the Clinton video from Fox News Sunday.
Keep showing it.
Keep showing it under your belief that it's giving spines to Democrats, and it's providing a roadmap of how to respond against the soft on terror charges, soft on war charges.
Republicans just keep showing that video.
Just keep showing.
Yes, keep showing it.
By the way, I have a question, ladies and gentlemen, very quickly.
We have here at leak, do we not?
We have a leak of a single element of the National Intelligence Estimate, which is pretty powerful stuff.
Says that we and that Bush created more terrorists.
Like we haven't heard that before.
And that going after these people is simply making them more enraged and and and it's making us less safe.
Going after them, it is really bad.
Now, this leak is devastating.
This leak, if too, of course it isn't, but if if true, I mean there's somebody seriously attempting to undermine policy.
Now, I I thought that uh Democrats and the drive-by media really didn't like these leakers.
Remember the whole Valerie Plane thing.
We needed a special prosecutor to find out who leaked her name.
I could be wrong, uh ladies and gentlemen.
Have have has any of you heard anybody in the media demanding that we get to the bottom of this to find out who this leaker is and who could be so despicable to try to destroy U.S. policy this way?
Um I haven't heard this.
Is it being said?
I think we need to get to the bottom of this, and I think we need to demand that the drive-by media expose the leaker and get interested in who this leaker is.
It's somebody in the Bush administration that did this.
We know how this is going to play out.
What'll happen is if we do find out who the leaker is, the drive-by media want to punish Rush, Bush Rovin Cheney for it, and maybe Scooter Libby all over again.
All right, back to New Orleans here.
ESPN last night are three uh social liberals in the broadcast booth ringing their hands over what lousy condition most of New Orleans is still in.
Yeah, that was great the domes open, great the game is back, great that the Saints won.
Great night, great that Bono showed up, yep, yep, yahoo.
Great that Green Day showed up, yep, yep, yep, yep, yahoo.
All that's great that the popcorn popped and the toilets flushed and all that great, great, great.
But then our cameras are gonna show you just how despicably unrebuilt portions of this city are tugging at our heartstrings and so forth.
And of course the implication is nobody cares.
Nobody except the guys in the ESPN booth care.
And nobody except Spike Lee cares.
Certainly Bush doesn't care.
I have a piece here from a Ludwig von Misis Institute written by Vidran Vuk, a student of economics at Loyola University of New Orleans.
It's entitled Socialist Man and the Big Easy.
Marxists long theorized that communism would bring about the new socialist man through communist programs, man would turn his sole purpose to laboring and struggling for the greater good of the collective.
Through socialist policies and redistribution, New Orleans has raised itself from its ruin, a new socialist man.
However, instead of working for the collective, this risen New Orleans man doesn't work at all.
He doesn't live for the collective, but lives at the expense of the collective.
This reality is drastically different from what Marxists had in mind when referring to the man created From socialism.
To a person with common sense, this seems like an obvious outcome.
If you give money to those who stay unemployed, you're not teaching them to work.
Rather, you're teaching them how to survive without working.
Let's begin with the supposed housing shortage in New Orleans.
The government's giving more and more trailers to the citizens of the city, even the officials of the city constantly talk about the housing shortage.
Every new Orlinian knows differently.
A simple look at Craigslist.org reveals the plentitude of homes available in New Orleans.
These are houses available for rent on just one website, which hardly represents all rentable properties in New Orleans.
If there are houses available, why do people still request trailers?
Well, it's simple.
Free is always better.
Sure, there are homes available.
Who wants to pay when you don't have to?
The government interprets this demand as a housing shortage.
At price zero, demand is as much as people want.
The realities of availability are thrown to the side so that these bureaucrats can get even more money to bribe disgruntled voters with free trailers, calling this problem a housing shortage.
Personally, I know people who were renting an apartment and then received a trailer from the government.
Their next step was to move out of the apartment.
Their problem was not finding a place or even paying a rent, but as I said, free is always better, especially when somebody else pays for it.
Now the next issue is jobs.
We all know that jobs are plentiful in New Orleans.
Remember this guy who lives there and are paying outstanding wages.
Recently I saw Taco Bell in Slidell hiring at eleven dollars an hour.
Here's another list of jobs available, low-skilled workers in New Orleans from Craig's List.
Now, here's another thing.
Why is the murder rate for July in New Orleans higher than last year with half the population around?
These jobs are available with great wages.
Living wage advocates always talk about how everything would be solved when wages for low-skilled labor were around ten to fifteen dollars an hour.
Well, here we have it, leftists.
Take a big look.
The wages are at the living wage rate, yet employers are desperate to find employees.
Anyone who applies for a job is often hired on the spot before the entire application is even filled out.
In the face of these opportunities, the crime rate grows.
Conservatives and libertarians are often accused of having a vicious and maligned view of the poor on welfare as lazy.
I don't think that welfare recipients of New Orleans are naturally lazy, but I believe that our socialist policies have made them so.
People simply don't want to work anymore.
They would rather do nothing and live on barely anything than consider work.
The accelerated rate in transfer payments to Katrina victims has resulted in an accelerated rate of crime not just in New Orleans, but in Houston and Jackson, Mississippi as well.
If you want to help the poor, don't start by talking about high wages.
Start by talking about the welfare system and its effects.
New Orleans has shown that high wages and job opportunities are not enough in the face of a subsidized mentality of redistributionist policies.
The welfare state must be destroyed to begin the process of change in New Orleans.
Amen.
And that's what apparently hasn't happened.
And so, you know, we get the usual hand.
You know what reminded me of last night?
I remembered back in the old days watching Thanksgiving football.
Back in in Sacramento, 1984, 85.
And remember football on a left coast.
The early game starts at 9.30.
The late game starts at one.
And so between the two games, uh, local news would come on and do um news reports.
And you could make book on it.
One or more of the stations was send out some reporter to some homeless shelter.
And they'd find the most destitute, unkempt, filthy looking person they could.
This person would be sitting in a homeless shelter cramming whatever the homeless shelter was feeding that day, some semblance of a Thanksgiving meal.
Both hands.
Half the food not ending up in the mouth, half of it on the whiskers.
Any info, babe, the reporter would look in the camera and try to make everybody at home feel absolutely guilty that this was happening.
It wasn't said, but the implication was clear.
How dare you be at home with your family and a fireplace on a cozy, warm Thanksgiving day, stuffing yourselves with all the food And more than you ever needed.
Look at these poor people.
How dare you?
What was the purpose?
And I sort of got the same feeling last night.
Watching a football game.
I don't want to watch a homeless shelter video when I'm watching a football game, and I don't want to listen to three Nimrods tell me what they think is wrong and then get some politicized guests on ESPN like Spike Lee to start blabbering their own political agendas in a football game.
Let them do it somewhere, but not in a football game.
But if you're going to do it, which they did, then try to be innovative.
And if you're going to take cameras out and show us the parts of New Orleans that are still devastated, and people that are still in pain at least endeavor to be honest and explain all sides of why.
Instead of just going with the easy lazy mantra that the government doesn't care, and that we need more compassion in this country, and that we need more concern, and yeah, the football game's on, but don't get the idea just because we can show you pictures of a of a really uh humping bourbon street and French quarter that this whole city is back.
Don't believe the ocean, it is just the ninth ward.
As lots of parts of this city do well.
We all know this, but as Vadran Vuk from uh Loyola University of New Orleans rights, and as I pre stated previously, none of these problems should exist down there, even after Katrina.
Even before.
What a socialist utopia.
The liberals have been running that place for who knows how long.
There shouldn't have been any unemployment, shouldn't have been any unhappiness, shouldn't have been any racism, shouldn't have been any of this.
Find out it was a cesspool of all that stuff.
And as such, now uh when this disaster happened, the people most profoundly affected by it by it were those who had been gently nurtured in this welfare state and were simply ill-equipped, unequipped to be able to handle them, including getting out of town.
So please spare me the preaching about how America doesn't care and all this usual political rot that we got in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina and just show us the game.
As I told you, ladies and gentlemen, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, known affectionately here as uh Miss America, asked her colleagues in the House Tuesday today to close the House's doors for a highly unusual secret session to discuss a classified intelligence analysis on global terrorism.
Such a session hasn't happened in the House since July of 1983, when the chamber went into a closed session to discuss U.S. support for a paramilitary operation in Niganawa.
In an interview with the AP, Pelosi said the secret session is necessary to allow members to better understand the intelligence community's most recent assessment on uh global terrorism House Republicans said nope.
Uh we reject the move.
Why do you think they want to go into closed session?
Because they smell a rat.
They I'm telling you, they they're worried now this whole thing is gonna be declassified.
Bush will never declassify it, they said it'll never do.
No, no, we can we own the issue.
Uh now the whole thing is gonna come out.
You've heard parts of it, because I have seen a website and shared this in the first hour of a man who has seen parts of it himself.
I wonder, you know, there's all this good economic news out there uh uh such as consumer confidence rises, gas prices are down, a factory index production manufacturing is up.
Uh, I wonder if uh Pelosi will call for a closed session to deal with those statistics and uh revelations as their post-Labor Day scenario continues to be shredded by an awful dose of unkind reality.
To the audio soundbites, Bill Schneider last night on CNN reported this.
Get this.
President Bill Clinton is trying to rally voters behind Democrats on the terrorism issue by defending his record and arguing that Democrats will implement the 9-11 Commission's recommendations.
Is Mr. Clinton a good spokesman for his party?
Apparently, 60% of Americans express a favorable opinion of the former president.
I went out and took a poll at CNN.
Clinton approval still at 60%.
When did they do this poll?
I mean, he shows up on the air on Sunday.
They got the poll results back Monday night.
Now moving on to the today's show, new hostette, Meredith Vieira interviewing James Carville and the forehead.
Vieira says, James, was this an example of genuine outrage on the part of the president?
Had Wallace maybe struck a chord with him, hit a nerve with him, or was it pure calculation, maybe a combination of all three?
It was not in a vacuum.
We had the Disney fiction when they made up facts and you know from some Rush Limbaugh guy and tried to send it out to school choking.
So we weren't very happy about that, as you can imagine.
And the president really wasn't happy about that.
You know what?
And Democrats are just tired of it.
And he asked that we're sick of the double standard.
We're sick of the fact that the media uh always asks one thing, they'll never ask the Bush administration another.
And you know what?
I'm glad he did it.
I think people around the country are saying we don't have to live under this regime anymore.
Well, it has a blatant double standard.
This resume.
James, old buddy.
This is a nice try.
But when you start talking about how the media gives the Bush administration an unfair shake, my friend.
Anybody with half a brain in this country knows that that is not true.
Democrats are tired of it.
You know, you guys need to really ask yourself, where would you be without your mainstream media buddies?
And this show on Sunday showed you.
And it's got uh, yeah, it is uh I'm telling you, he's he's got a good indication here of just what would happen if the drive-by media weren't there to prop up this phony baloney, plastic banana, good time rock and roller legacy of a former president.
Then uh then Vieira says uh to the to the forehead, well, you guys have argued for a long time.
I mean, you've been hard on your own party.
You said you need to get a backbone.
Do you think in a way Clinton was giving this party a backbone thing?
Uh when you're accused of not being tough on terror, you gotta speak up.
Good Dr. Clinton gave us a spinal transplant on Sunday.
Finally, what Democrats have needed for a long time, they should have done this in the 02 elections, they should have done it in the 04 elections.
Stand up and say the Emperor has no clothes.
George W. Bush has not kept you safe, America.
Stop the tape!
What else are they saying?
Forehead, they've been saying this for three years.
It's very easy to stand up and talk tough on terror if you are.
But if you aren't, it's really hard to do.
And the Democrats aren't.
What do you mean?
Stand up.
You got your own leader in there saying we're gonna pull the troops out and redeploy them to Okinawa, Jack Murpha, and he's been celebrated.
I mean, you guys, you you you you may want to try to fool everybody else and think that there's a way to refute this soft on terror business.
You guys come up with the Al-Qaeda Bill of Rights, you guys got Senator Durbin out there comparing American interrogators to the gulags of the Soviet Union and uh the Nazis and poll pot.
Well, come on.
You this stuff is not happening in a vacuum.
You guys are just denying reality.
This is real simple.
If a Democrats had a backbone, it would be on display naturally.
If you need a backbone transplant, it means you don't have one.
If Bill Clinton went out there forehead, good Dr. Clinton gave you a spinal transplant, it means you didn't have one.
If you did have one, it would be obvious to everybody.
Besides Clinton's not into those kinds of transplants, I don't think.
Still have uh audio sound bites, Democrats reacting to Clinton and the truth.
In reaction to his lies.
Richard Ben Vanice changing his story about some things that happened in the 9 11 Commission uh panel.