All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 9, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
33:49
August 9, 2006, Wednesday, Hour #2
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And greetings to you, thrill seekers, music lovers, uh, conversationalists all across the fruited play in Rush Limbo, America's real anchor man, a living legend behind the golden EIB microphone here at the Limbaugh Institute for Advanced Conservative Studies.
That's the largest free education institution in the free and oppressed world, or free or oppressed world, because the uh learning never stops.
There are no degrees, no graduates, learning never stops.
It's an ongoing education, and it's free.
Uh 800 282-2882.
The email address is rush at eIBNet.com.
Can we go back?
Uh we need Chris Matthews again.
Grab number 10, uh audio soundbite number 10.
This from Chris Matthews last night on his uh, well, it wasn't hardball.
It was his election coverage on PMS NBC.
The body language of the two is so different.
You have this very waspy fella, Lamont, very calm, very casual, very St. Paul's almost, in the prep school sense.
Laban, of course, is the Schmaltzy ethnic guy, the Uncle Tenuse, you know, the guy that's very once he kind of lacrimose in his almost almost post-nasal drip voices, but he doesn't look happy.
All right.
Now, uh let's let the smaltsey ethnic guy, the uncle Tanuse.
And as I said in the last hour, Uncle Tenuse was a character on the old Danny Thomas show.
And I think uh pretty safe in saying an Uncle Tenuse is played by Hans Connried.
Uh huge hooked nose and so forth.
The and here's here's Matthews describing, let's let's be honest about this, folks.
Let's just put it out there.
When you say somebody is a smalty ethnic guy, you're not talking about an Arab.
You are talking about a Jew.
You describe somebody as a schmaltzy ethnic guy who is uh uh pulse nasal drip with his voice, lacrimose and so forth.
Uncle Tenuse in character was a Lebanese Arab.
Danny Thomas was a Christian Lebanese, uh, and and Uncle Tenuse, therefore.
But so isn't it interesting that you have uh uh Chris Matthews describing an Arab as uh as a Jew on the on the basis of appearance?
Uh schmaltzy ethnic guy, which I I uh you know there are some people saying this, but they're dancing around it.
But one of the little uh not often discussed aspects of the kook fringe base of the Democratic Party.
I'm just gonna put it out there, is it's anti-Semitism.
There is so much anti-Semitism today in the Democratic Party.
Uh it is it is I I don't think it's an accident that uh Sharpton and the uh Reverend Dax are up there standing behind Lamont during Lamont's and but what's calm about Lamont, when I listen to these Lamont uh remarks from his acceptance speech last night, I hear somebody assist a couple octaves and a couple decibel levels before below Howard Dean.
Uh yeah, the only thing is missing is the scream in this calm, uh uh waspy fellow, very calm, casual, very St. Paul in a prep school sense.
That's a way to relate to most of America, Chris.
St. Paul, what the hell St. Paul?
It was a person.
St. Paul, what's it's a prep school.
Well, how many Americans actually go to prep school, particularly the Northeast?
That's this little little bit of a uh of a sidebar.
Now, as long as we're talking about this, we've we've we've got to move on to Cynthia McKinney, uh, ladies and gentlemen, and we have some audio sound bites from her, as you uh may have heard by now in in her in her uh I guess you call it concession speech last night.
She sang a a rap tune.
Tell you about hard work.
Minimal legs with a baby on the way.
Let me tell you about hard work.
As it was recently said, nobody else in that crowd knew the lyrics, so there was no sing-along going on.
It was uh it was just Cynthia McKinney.
And you want to say this is a this is a an anti-incumbent uh vote in a primary in August.
I think uh mainstream Georgians in her district just get fed up with it.
I mean who wants their representative beating up the Capitol Police with cell phones and saying some of this if you go look at the things that she has been saying for crying out loud.
This notion that voters do not examine candidates in a in a in an in in-depth manner.
They don't vote issues.
Nah, they're just tired or they're happy with what's going on that they vote that way.
It's this continuing assumption by drive-by media personnel and the American left that voters are basically unsophisticated uh boobs.
Here is uh portion of uh her remarks after she stopped singing.
Electronic voting machines are a threat to our democracy.
So let the word go out.
We aren't going to tolerate any more stolen elections.
Well, I'll bet you old Hank Johnson's quaking in her boots.
Uh there's a Democrat accusing another Democrat of fudging the election via voting machines uh in a uh in a primary.
And here now is Cynthia McKinney speaking truth to kooks everywhere.
One year to the day before Dr. King was murdered, he declared that the greatest purveyor of violence in the world was his own country.
With Israel's invasion of Lebanon, there might even be a call for more U.S. UN troops to be stationed in the Middle East.
We here tonight say to our commander in chief, sir, no, sir.
No, sir, no.
Except uh Cynthia, nobody has to listen to you anymore.
You lost.
It's L O S T. Is there any reason why?
Not even mainstream blacks in Georgia hate their country like this.
Like Cynthia McKinney's out there are too and has been, and this is nothing new, so you might say that things are happening as they should.
In tribute, ladies and gentlemen, Paul Shanklin sings.
The Reverend L. Sharpton through the megaphone.
Cynthia's mother.
And parody of the old Doctor Hook tune, Sylvia's mother, and again, that by Paul Shanklin.
A quick timeout.
We'll be back and continue here in uh mere moments.
Sort of fascinating, isn't it?
That in the 2000 presidential campaign, nobody at MSNBC, Chris Matthews, nobody else described uh Senator Lieberman as Uncle Tenuse as a Schmaltzy ethnic guy.
Isn't it amazing?
So you go from Uncle Tanus to Uncle Tom in six years in the Democratic Party.
Welcome back, folks.
800 282-2882 L. Rushball on a roll.
Mark and Bethesda, Maryland, you're next, sir.
Nice to have you with us.
Good afternoon, Rush.
I am a speck of red and a sea of blue.
Um Jewish Republican here, and I want to thank you for your for your continuing support of Israel.
Thank you, sir.
Uh, you're welcome.
I think it's it's scary for all of my democratic friends here that just don't get it.
Especially with this Lieberman um result yesterday.
The party has been taken over.
Their party has been taken over by people that are anti-Israel, as in Cindy Sheehan and Soros, who is happens to be a self-hating Jew.
Right.
They they hate Israel, they hate Jews, they're terrorism deniers.
And I just I just hope it's a wake-up cult to the Jewish people that are out there.
Is that still the best party for them?
Yeah, I doubt that that's going to happen.
It's going to take a little bit more than this.
The uh the seat of this anti-Semitism right now is focused in kooks.
Uh, like Sheehan and uh and and the blogs and the move on.org people in Soros.
And I'll tell you, I if if you uh if you read letters to the editor from newspapers, which I do, and this is part of show, I love reading letters to the editor.
Have you ever written letters to the editor of the New York Times?
You may as well be reading one of these kook blogs.
And and many of these people that write these letters are apparently Jewish, and they echo the same sentiments that uh that the Sheehan's echo.
And you say, okay, what is it that's the unifying force here?
And it's hatred for Bush.
It's not hatred for Arabs, it's not hatred for uh Ahmadinezad or the Hezbows, it's hatred for Bush.
It's uh I I don't know what's gonna, You know, it's like I I could say the same thing about the uh the black population in this country.
When are they gonna wake up and understand the party they've been supporting does nothing but take them for granted and doesn't offer them any real solution and just uses them?
Uh uh it it I just don't see it happening.
I I think it's one of the most uh covered up aspects of what's happening to the Democratic Party is how anti-Semitic uh and anti-Israel uh the the apparent movers and shakers in that party are.
And Lieberman's a living testament to it.
I mean, let's be honest.
Let me ask you, Mark.
I mean, you you you said you're Republican Jew.
How much do you think Lieberman owes his defeat to the fact that he's just Jewish at this point in time?
I I don't know.
With what the with the way that party's being being taken over, probably some, because remember last summer what Cindy Sheehan said about Israel.
So probably some of it.
Uh what did she say?
I've refreshed my memoir.
It says uh here is the quote.
You get America out of Iraq and Israel out of Palestine, and you'll stop the terrorists.
So again, blame America, blame Israel.
Yeah, exactly.
Okay, that's that's um that's true.
Well, in fact, uh speaking of blame America, blame Israel.
Let me give you a little uh thanks, thanks, Mark, for the uh for the phone call.
I appreciate it.
There's a guy named Lawrence Wright, um, who is a staff writer for New Yorker.
The New Yorker magazine, he's got a new book out, and the book is called The Looming Tower, which he calls, quote, a bid to understand and explain the rise of Islamic extremism.
And in an interview with Al Reuters, the fake war photo guys, uh Lawrence Wright explains that American authors and filmmakers haven't done enough to blame America for 9-11.
Here's a quote.
I feel like it's been a great failure of our artists and our writers that we haven't done a better job at looking at ourselves and how we uh are, and how our own behavior to some extent contributed to this tragedy, 9-11.
Our behavior, yep.
According to Wright, Americans lost sight of our core values, especially the rule of law and a code of decency.
In other words, we, not the terrorists, we lack values, and we lack decency and respect for the rule of law.
And oh, yeah, the Islamic world perceives a pro-Israel bias in our Middle East policies.
So it's not just kooks uh like Cindy Sheehan and the others.
Here's a New Yorker magazine.
It could very well be a kook.
Uh uh blaming us for our and our association uh with uh with Israel.
He said when bin Laden attacked America, he was posing two questions to us.
One is, what's America and what does it stand for?
The other is what is Islam and what does it stand for?
I'm not making this up.
This guy's got a book out, and it's all about how we're to blame.
And there aren't enough artists and writers blaming America, doing articles, stories, movies, what have you, blaming America.
The only question, I mean, you uh rational person would ask or associate with uh bin Laden was whether we had the resolve to wipe his evil off the face of the earth.
Because he didn't think that we have that resolve anymore after Mogadishu is why he did this, because he thought he could get away with it.
And uh so he was under the impression that we were cowardly, we wouldn't take casualties and he could get away with this.
Now these blue state Lamont liberals don't have the will to do that.
They don't have the will to wipe evil off the face of the earth because they think we're it.
They think we are the evil.
They blame us and Israel, while doing everything they can to understand terrorists.
They don't even have the sense to know that we're at war.
And if they admit that we're at war, they don't have the sense to admit who the enemy is because they consider us, their own country to be the enemy.
So when you when you say what's it gonna take for certain groups to wake up and uh and smell the coffee, I frankly uh uh you know they're they're they're just certain people are liberals or liberals first, others are what they are first.
Uh and the the common enemy that they've always had is gonna remain the common enemy.
Uh but I just I I don't think there's any question about the fact that that uh one of Lieberman's one of the one of the um should I say One of the factors in his uh defeat was the fact that he's just Jewish.
Right now, and you uh if you if you if you go to these blogs, if you spend any time reading them and uh the move on.orgs and so forth, you'll find some some of the most anti-Semitic stuff on the face of the earth that you've ever read and anti-Israel stuff uh that you have uh ever read.
Marvin in Detroit, I'm glad you called.
Welcome to the EIB network.
Hello.
Yeah, hi, Rush.
Uh mega Detroit Tiger Ditto's from uh the beautiful blue state of Michigan.
Thank you, sir.
Hey, Rush, I was just wondering, what do you think?
You know, if Lieberman does run as an independent, uh what's the chances of maybe a Republican sneaking in there?
And if if they do, what is the is it a simple majority in the election?
Yeah, but it won't happen.
Uh the I think if Lieberman runs as an independent, the the uh Republicans might try to get a Republican in there to run just to uh you know cause problems.
I don't think a Republicans could sneak in that state.
That's too blue a state.
That that state is um uh I mean I don't even I'm not sure it would be competitive.
And if if it were a Republican to be a Lowell Wiker type, you may as well have a Democrat be it'd be a Link Chafey type uh that would uh that would win in uh in Connecticut.
Run who will run for the Republicans.
Uh who will r in in Connecticut?
Yes.
I have no clue.
I only know ten.
Uh now they have had elected they they they've elected Republican governors.
I mean, it it's it's uh I mean it's not impossible.
Nothing uh nothing is.
And you know, it's it's still early.
I mean, th as we know, things happen um at a breakneck pace in politics, and they're always uh as most things in the future are unpredictable.
Uh and as anything, anything could happen here.
I I don't want to lock myself in to saying that no Republican could win, the Republicans aren't gonna nominate anybody.
I in fact I I think um the the the thing you look at as far as Republicans are concerned in Connecticut is how does this end up helping Republican congressional incumbents holding like Chris Shays and uh and Rob Simmons.
Uh this result, no question boosts their chance uh of holding on to their districts, and they're vulnerable right now, according to polling data.
Um the the Democrats have to win these two seats in Connecticut if they have any chance of uh taking back the House.
This result I think helps these two Republicans hold on to their seats.
Quick time out, we'll be back right after this.
A living legend performing daily on the EIB network, executing assigned host duties flawlessly.
Zero mistakes.
Okay, you want you want the dream outcome here, ladies and gentlemen.
Here's the dream outcome.
In Connecticut, Lieberman does run as an independent, defies all of these efforts by Democrats and the drive-by media to get him not to do so.
He runs as an independent and he wins.
That changes that wipes out what happened yesterday.
And that is an election for a seat.
This was just a primary.
But if Lieberman runs as an independent in Connecticut and would beat, end up beating uh Lamont, then all of this chest pumping and all this flexing and all this talk.
In the meantime, between now and then, the whole Democrat Party is gonna lurch and lurch and lurch to the left.
And as they continue to lurch left and act in fear of their kook base, Lieberman comes in, wins as an independent, and it just you talk about an earthquake inside the upper levels of the Democratic Party in Washington, D.C. I mean, it that's that's the dream uh outcome of this.
The question for me is can Lieberman withstand the pressure that they're going to bring on him?
And it's intense.
They're going to send Clinton in there to do an Andrew Cuomo and a Bob Torricelli on him.
Dodd and these guys, the best friends, are already throwing him under the bus.
Uh elected Democrats and so forth, uh his colleagues in the uh in the Senate, which I guess they they may think they have no choice in doing.
Uh but there'll be a lot of pressure on him not to run s for the express reason.
Exact reason what I just said.
The worst possible outcome for this guy to run as an independent and win and beat Lamont because in the next three to four months, well, August, September, three months, these clowns are gonna be lurching so far to the left that uh Earth may tilt on its axis.
And and then to have all that just shown to be the wrong thing to do, which I think is why I wouldn't want to be Lieberman right now.
They're gonna pff.
Democrats, folks, you don't understand.
It's these guys, they're gonna they're gonna unload everything on him not to run.
If there are any skeletons in his closet, they are going to leak.
Where's he gonna use money?
Well, Lamont's gonna get get the money, but uh I that's a where's I know we're Lieberman, I know Lamont's gonna get the money as the as the party nominee, but uh there are more registered independents in Connecticut than there are Democrats.
Most of the registered voters in Connecticut are independent, quote unquote, so I've heard in the last two days anyway.
Um we'll see.
I I I you know money is of course a crucial factor, and Lieberman would be at a disadvantage in um in getting the money, but he does have um he's got a track record, presidential uh vice presidential nominee, uh six years ago, eighteen years in the Senate.
Name ID.
Well, I think that's you know, H.R. just said I could help him.
No qu no no question, I helped Carl McCall when the Democrats abandoned him in his quest for the uh gubernatorial uh nomination in New York.
Um I think a I you know I'm gonna tell you a lot of Republicans will be raising money for Lieberman.
That will it will happen.
Uh so it's this is not done with yet.
It just remains to be seen what pressures the Democrats bring to bear on Lieberman, even if he has no skeletons in his closet, that may come up.
Uh it'll it'll it he knows it is gonna get vicious.
Let's get let me give you another example here of the Democratic Party and the mess that it's in.
A little story here from the Associated Press out of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
The Pennsylvania Democratic Party objected Tuesday to signatures collected by three Green Party candidates, including a challenger in uh in one of the nation's most hotly contested U.S. Senate races.
The Democrats asked a court to remove the candidates from the November ballot.
The candidates have said that they jointly collected at least ninety thousand valid signatures, uh, which is far more than the sixty-seven thousand seventy needed to qualify for the ballot.
The Democrats alleged in a Commonwealth court filing that more than sixty-nine thousand included fake names, names of unregistered voters, and ileligible uh signatures.
Now, this has all been brought about by the campaign of Bob Casey, uh, who is running against uh Santorum, who's closing the gap polling-wise in the Senate race in um in Pennsylvania.
The reason Democrats are upset about this is because the Greens are libs, just like Casey is a lib, just like Democrats are libs.
And so they don't want the Greens coming in and splitting the Democrat vote.
Now, the interesting thing about this to me is that in the normal run of things, the Democrats, one of their core constituency groups is the wacko environmental left.
And normally they court them and they're on the same side of the aisle, and they raise money from them and so forth.
But even the the environmentalists are wackos too, folks.
The environmentalists are full-fledged, 100% kooks, the Green Party types, and they are gonna try to destroy this outfit just as they tried to destroy Ralph Nader.
So while they welcome these constituency groups when the Democrats have the table or the seat at the table of power, when these guys come in and try to undermine it, they're worthless and they'll throw them overboard like Lieberman.
I understand it's electoral politics.
My point here is not the Democrats are mean and disingenuous or hypocrites.
My point is they ain't unified.
They are not unified.
They may think they're unified in their hatred for Bush, but um there are a bunch of Democrats on the left not satisfied with the quote unquote mainstream Democrats.
They're running against them out there in these primaries, and it's uh uh not it's not being commented on uh and analyzed in the proper way.
But the idea that there's unity in the Democratic Party, especially now after this race in Connecticut yesterday, is a myth.
And don't buy it.
Jimmy in Lubbock, Texas.
Hello, sir.
Oh, Rush, you know, I think you're exactly right about the McGovernization of the Democratic Party, but I think it's it's nothing new.
It's an ongoing process that I think dates back to the Chicago Convention riots in 1968.
You know, remember the the target of that Viet Cong uprising wasn't a conservative, it was Hubert Humphrey, who was Mr. Liberal himself.
Yeah, but the Democratic establishment.
Yeah, but if you go back, we've done this.
We've got we've got an excerpt.
We got the actual audio excerpts of some Hubert Humphrey speeches from back in the 60s.
And if you listen to Hubert Humphrey today, just as if you listen to John F. Kennedy today, you will hear no similarity at all to today's mainstream Democrats.
In his in his day, Humphrey, no question, DFL, Minnesota Liberal Democrat.
No question, but I'm just the Democratic Party, and you're right in a sense, because the party's descent into madness uh dates back 40 years.
Uh and and they they've it's been a gradual thing.
There have been a couple blips with Clinton being elected and and uh Watergate and so forth, but they have been descending into this far-left swirl for uh for quite a while.
And it's it's all because what I said, they have no vision for the future.
Their vision is power.
That's why they love Castro, folks.
They envy his power.
They marvel at it.
And and uh wish they had it.
And the the thing that the they only can glom on to for comfort is their past.
Pure and simple.
Janice in Dundee, Michigan.
Welcome.
You're on uh the Rush Limbaugh program.
Hi.
Hey, Rush, hi.
I know you're uh football fan, so I wanted to get a plug in for our terrific Detroit Tigers.
Yeah, it's about time.
Detroit had a sports team that uh brought uh you know uh uh respect uh to the league in which it plays.
That's good.
Thank you.
We have the best record in baseball, and I believe since uh May 21st.
We're 76 and 37.
Now that's big.
That's that's big.
And that yeah, I know I've been I've been following the Tigers.
I check baseball every month or so.
Well, thank you.
And we had Ron Howard and Tom Hanks and the stands last week.
I said they're probably making a movie, worst to first.
Last year we had the worst record.
So, and listen, uh uh one quickie for you before you go on vacation.
Yeah.
About your problem uh not wanting any kids.
Old Benny Hill used to say Wait a minute.
Who says that's a problem?
Oh, well, okay.
I I should rephrase that then.
But old Benny Hill used to say, marry an older woman.
They don't swell, they don't tell, and they're grateful as hell.
Uh they don't swell, they don't tell, and they're grateful as hell.
Yeah.
Why?
Because they're already swollen.
Their heads are swollen because they're loving it, right?
Um uh are you are you telling me you're an older woman and you're proposing here?
Oh, God no.
Okay.
I'm an older woman, yes.
Uh, well, you know, who was the guy that sang the song, the old RB tune, if you want to be happy for the rest of your life.
Jimmy Sowell.
So your your phrase like Benny Hill, um uh whatever the what other phrase was there.
But he that he said marry an ugly woman, right?
Right.
Uh Benny Hill said very an older woman, but uh Jimmy Sol said, you want to be happy for the rest of your life, make an ugly woman your wife.
Ugly woman, right.
I remember.
I remember.
Well, it's great to talk to you.
Have a great few days off.
Thank you, Janice.
Uh, appreciate it.
For those of you just tuning in wondering, we're doing a little version of open line Friday today.
So you can you can call about whatever you want to call uh about, since I'm not gonna be here tomorrow or Friday, uh quick little uh golf weekend trip to Hawaii and be back uh early next week to resume.
The only thing is, you know, what what what of any major consequence is going to happen while I'm gone?
Something always does.
Speaking of that, there was a piece uh I had it in the stack yesterday.
I didn't get to it, but there was a column in the uh uh Wall Street Journal's opinion journal.com website by uh a Princeton scholar by the name of Bernard Lewis.
And the premise of his piece was to issue a warning that Mahmood Ahmad Dinizad may have cataclysmic events in mind for August 27th.
He wrote this there's a radical difference between the Islamic Republic of Iran and other governments with nuclear weapons.
This difference is expressed in what can only be described as the apocalyptic worldview of Iran's present rulers.
In Islam, as in Judaism and Christianity, there are certain beliefs concerning the cosmic struggle at the end of time.
Gog and Magog, Antichrist, Armageddon, and for Shi'ite Muslims, a long-awaited return of the 12th Imam, ending in the final victory of the forces of good over evil, however these may be defined.
President Mahmud Ahmadinizad and his followers clearly believe that this end time is now.
And he has said so.
Bernard Lewis is right about that.
And that the terminal struggle has already begun and is indeed well advanced.
It may even have a date indicated by several references by Ahmadinizad to giving his final answer to the U.S. about nuclear development by August 2nd.
This year, August 22nd, corresponds to the 27th day of the month of Reab, or Rajab, of the year 1427.
This by tradition is the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of the Prophet Muhammad on the winged horse, first to the farthest mosque, usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back.
This might well be deemed an appropriate date for the apocalyptic ending of Israel, and if necessary, of the world.
It's far from certain that Mr. Ahmadinizad plans any such cataclysmic events precisely for August 22nd, but it would be wise to bear the possibility in mind.
This is the kind of thinking that Ahmadinizad has spawned with all of his rhetoric that Israel must be destroyed, the 12th Imam will return.
This will happen on my watch, he says.
And so if you do the calculations, August 22nd is the date that Mahmud told the world he would respond to United Nations and world demands for their enrichment program, uranium enrichment program, and their new program to be stopped.
Ahmadinezad all respond on August 22nd, and so it corresponds with uh this apocalyptic date in the Quran.
And people are keeping a sharp eye.
I will be back on the 22nd.
I just wanted to assure you, back in just a second.
Hi, welcome back, Rush Limboss, serving humanity, executing assigned host duties flawlessly, half my brain tied behind my back just to make it fair.
I want to I want to share with you another point, ladies and gentlemen, something I have been pondering here.
You know, yesterday Lanny Davis published this uh op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, well, the Wall Street Journal published this uh op-ed by Lanny Davis.
And I will confess a number of you people were eager and excited and sent me emails.
Rush, Rush, Rush, Russ, you have to you have to read Lenny Davis.
You have to talk about Lanny Davis is ripping the left.
So I read it.
And I thought, well, our side's been bamboozled again.
Because all this piece did was basically convey a conventional wisdom, a stereotype, a cliche, that all of us are just a bunch of racist, sexist, hateful bigots.
And Lanny, not everybody knows that, Lanny said, but that's it was disturbing to him to see all of the hate that was popping up by some of these fringe people on the left, because everybody knows that there's nothing but tolerance and love and affection and compassion among people on the left.
And while people were thinking, wow, this is progress, Lanny Davis ripping his own people really wasn't that at all.
Lanny Davis worried about what's bubbling up there in his so-called party, which I think is perverted and polluted right now, but it also served and gave him an opportunity, continue to rip and characterize us in ways that are not true.
Along those lines, may I ask you to think about something.
The so-called net roots out there, these these kook blogs, move on.org, the daily cause.
Uh Ariana Huffington's joke of a website.
There are two characteristics that identify these people.
One, they are super rich.
George Soros funds all these people.
Uh Ariana herself didn't do too badly in her divorce, as it's been said she divorced well.
Uh The people are super rich.
And the second thing to notice about them is they are super white.
The Huffington Post, the Daily Cause, Moveon.org.
They are whiter than the KKK, folks.
Nobody ever criticizes or even well, not even nobody recognized.
All we ever hear about there's not any black faces in that crowd when Newt Gingrich spoke.
Well, there aren't any black voices, faces anywhere near these kook blogs in the New Democrat base.
And look at their candidate in Connecticut.
Greenwich Ned Lamont.
Multi, multi-millionaire media tycoon.
And they got their start with Howard Dean, who, by the way, is no slouch when it comes to the financial department.
Now, where are the net roots?
Where are these these blogs, these Democrat uh kooks?
Where are they in major black races?
Cynthia McKinney could not be a more articulate spokesperson for their insane beliefs, and they were not near her side.
Not even the Reverend Dax and Reverend Sharpton dared go near Cynthia McKinney.
They wanted to hang around the rich white people in Ned Lamont's campaign.
You can't get a more certifiable kook that perfectly articulates what the kook base of the Democrat Party believes than Cynthia McKinney, and they weren't within one half of a continent of her.
These liberals, these progressives, they are racist.
Where are the demands for black and minority voices on these blogs?
You don't hear them, ladies and gentlemen.
It's an exclusive club.
Very rich, very white, very liberal, and very kooky.
We have 11 missing Egyptians running around like ghosts.
And Al Zawahiri has announced that an Egyptian group has just joined Al Qaeda.
▲
Export Selection