All Episodes
Previous Next
April 11, 2006 - Rush Limbaugh Program
35:49
April 11, 2006, Tuesday, Hour #3
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
America's anchorman, America's Truth Detector, America's Doctor of Democracy, general, all-around good guy, harmless, lovable little fuzzball, well-known radio racon tour, Rushland Boy, emitting vocal vibrations.
As your highly trained broadcast specialist resonating coast to coast on the one and only EIB network, a thrill and delight to have you with us.
Telephone number is 800-282-2882.
Without any further delay, she's been patiently waiting to go to Sandoval, Florida.
And Val, and she, if you're just joining us, has a business.
Tell the story again.
Just bring everybody up to speed, Val.
Well, what I was saying to that lady was that the business I currently run, 25% of my labor force, is Hispanic.
They are legal, and I pay them as good or better as any white or black employees.
They make $35,000 to $45,000 on average.
And my problem with all this is, once again, the liberals are painting people that are anti-illegal immigration as racist.
They're making this about Mexico and Mexicans.
I want to know where these people were 10 years ago when Eastern Bloc Russians and Czechs poured into this country.
The same ones that today now have a heavy influx of prostitution and the Russian mafia in our country because they went unchecked back then.
Ted Kennedy didn't have time for them because they were white.
But I wanted to tell my story as a white business owner in Florida.
I think that classifies me as one of these people they keep liking to talk about that were a bunch of racists.
When in 1997, I hired two exceptional young Russian people to work in one of the restaurants I owned.
They work 18 hours a day and asked for more.
I paid them extremely well.
They were growing with the company, leaps and bounds.
They were legal to my knowledge.
I got a call that their Social Security didn't match up somehow.
I pulled these two, my two best employees on that resort into my office.
They went ahead and admitted to me that they paid a lawyer in New York $5,000 for fake papers.
I looked at them and two of my best employees in the middle of high tourist season, I fired them on the spot and informed that I'd be calling the INS, which I did.
Now, I want that lady who called you before to remember, these are white people.
I called the INS and reported their names, their fake Social Security numbers.
They never called me back.
A week later, they went down the road to another restaurant, started working there.
I again called the INS and reported this because back then, I was under the impression that as a business owner, you had a $10,000 fine per employee, per illegal employee.
They still did nothing.
And as far as I know to this day, those kids are still working here under the radar.
And that is my whole point about this.
It is not about race.
It is about you are supposed to fear and respect laws.
Now, back then as a business owner, I feared the laws.
I don't fear them anymore because nobody enforces them.
But I still respect them.
I don't want cheap labor because you get what you pay for.
I want good labor.
And I don't care what color your skin is.
If you do a good job for me, you'll be a manager.
You'll get benefits.
You'll get medical insurance.
You'll get vacations.
But if you're illegal, you're going to get nothing but the boot.
And I'm very disappointed in my country's government for not enforcing this.
But this started long ago.
And we have trained these illegals, beginning with the white Eastern Bloc Russians and Czechs, that we don't enforce it.
So this rioting in our street, we basically deserve it because we've set it up.
We've showed them you don't have to be afraid.
And I've gone so far as to actually call and report people, and nothing happens.
But I think the Conservative Party, or even if you're not conservative, if you're a business owner and you're against illegal immigration and you believe it is what it is, breaking a law, fire your illegals, pay better, get better people.
And the Conservative Party better do everything they can to make sure that everybody understands this has nothing to do with race.
And once again, Kennedy and his bunch are making it racist.
Shut us up.
And that's all I have to say on the matter.
Don't go away.
Because I wanted to talk to you about this race.
Basically, you answered my question.
Let me ask you why you think that they're using race as a means of shutting up the critics.
Putting the critics on the defensive.
Absolutely.
Now, why does that work?
You're absolutely right, but why does that work?
Well, because you know what?
Once upon a time, racism was horrible.
We had KKK.
We had blacks being hung.
Not just we, but every country, every civilization had racism, rampant, legalized racism.
And so it's a black eye.
It's a black eye, especially on whites.
And so it's a power against us because any enlightened, intelligent, decent human being does not want to oppress people of any color.
And we, as American whites, do not want to oppress any nation, any color, any person.
The second, though, we step on the liberals' toes and get around their voting base, which is in this particular case, illegal immigrants.
They immediately call us racist because what are you going to do?
You're going to shut up.
We have been taught.
We have been trained over the last 20 years to be PC, to never say anything controversial.
And so we're basically being trained more.
We're gagged.
And you know one, for one, I had a discussion two days ago with all my Mexican employees out back discussing this issue.
And I was as adamant as I am right now.
And they weren't going, you're racist.
They're going, yeah, it's wrong.
We know people that do it.
It's wrong.
Look at us.
We're making great money.
So if the conservatives don't start putting down this racist issue, it's going to be the end of this.
We're going to lose this battle as with everything else.
And we already lost the Russian battle 10 years ago.
Look at Brighton.
What is it?
Brighton Beach?
All Russian mafia.
Right.
So the proof is in the pudding because where was Kennedy in 1997 when the Russians were coming in in droves?
Because they were white, Kennedy had nothing to say.
Let me change the subject on you here.
Not the subject, but change the event.
Give you a couple of examples.
Look at Tawana Brawley.
The Al Sharpton Tawana Brawley case.
The police officer in that case, Stephen Pagonis, was automatically assumed to be guilty simply because he's white.
And the reason that this has happened, and you look at the case down at Duke, Duke University with the lacrosse team and this hooker, who's 27 years old, in both cases, rather than,
and it works this way in the illegal immigration debate, when the race card is played, works any time the race card is played, the media and their allies on the left immediately see a great story based on the continuing clash of cultures and races rather than exotic dancer.
Did I call her up?
That was slip of the tongue.
Exotic dancer.
Folks, honestly, this was a slip of the tongue.
I got a better example.
The hurricanes.
My house was devastated by hurricanes.
Oh, yeah.
Yes, there are countless examples.
Yeah, but because I was a white, self-supportive person, nobody paid any attention to my losses.
And everybody focused on Katrina because it was blacks.
And that's wrong because I have a mother and a son.
I have two households that depend on my income, and I've worked myself up from scratch.
I have clean toilets and served tables to get where I am today.
But somehow my losses, my pain, my suffering did not matter the least.
And I tell you, when FEMA did show up on our island with little blue plastic roofs, we were grateful.
We were not standing on our roofs going, you owe us, you owe us.
We were going, thank you.
That's really nice.
But once again, we had no attention other than that little quiet show of military and FEMA support.
But where was CNN then?
You know, when our island was destroyed, we couldn't even get off the island for six days.
Where were they?
So it's just a repeat performance of the same old line.
Well, racism is the last vestige of the Democrats.
Yep.
They supported segregation 40, 50 years ago because they thought that would solidify their southern base.
Today, they use it to try to make inroads with illegal immigrants.
They use it at every opportunity, and they can't.
And you're right, it's because it does intimidate and it immediately places people on the defensive.
The charge that you're a racist, the nature of the evidence is irrelevant.
It's the seriousness of the charge.
If the charge is made, it must be true.
What I was going to say is that the media, and it's true in this case in Durham with Duke University, with the exotic dancer and the lacrosse team.
David Brooks actually said it best.
If you wander through the thicket of commentary that already surrounds the Duke La Crosse scandal, the first thing you notice is how sociological it is.
In almost every article and piece of commentary, the event is portrayed not as a crime between individuals, but as a clash between classes, races, and sexes.
Several decades ago, American commentators would have used an entirely different vocabulary to grapple with what happened at Duke.
Instead of the vocabulary of sociology, they would have used the language of morality and character.
So the language has been changed now, but this charge gets bandied about in order to quiet the opponents.
And it's easy for, like, the woman who called that you're reacting to to pick up on this and call here and make a totally baseless charge that this program is anti-Hispanic when no such implication nor statement has ever been made.
But you know, the real thing you're right about here, Val, aside from all the details and historical documentation you shared with us, is where are the Republicans?
They're quiet.
They're silent.
They're scared to death because they see a bunch of voters down the road, too.
This is amazing.
We've got, I think, an opportunity here for this to backfire big time on the Democrats and the American left.
Well, and the ironic thing is, what these people don't seem to realize of when you come in this country illegally, you're going to keep yourself down because you've got to hide under the radar.
We've talked about that quite a bit.
I guarantee you, you come in here on a work visa and you work the system and you do it legally, you can make some serious money.
And then you have the right to vote for Kennedy or not vote for Kennedy.
But short of amnesty, these people can't vote for Kennedy anyways.
And while I'm on it, I don't know why people do keep voting for him.
But the bottom line is you are never going to get anywhere except $5, $6, $7, $8 an hour if you can't be legal and you can't get promoted and you can't do any of the steps necessary to get it.
Well, of course.
But there are one thing, these marches, these protests are proving the illegals are willing to come out of the shadows.
Exactly.
They have no fear anymore because, like I said, with the Eastern Bloc, we haven't bothered enforcing our laws in I don't know how many years, possibly decades.
They know it.
It's like Tavlov's dog.
Enough conditioning, and you respond.
Well, they've been basically shown not to fear the laws.
But you have to understand what amnesty is.
Amnesty is the objective of the Democratic Party.
It's the objective of some misguided Republicans.
Making these people legal with a wave of a magic wand is the objective.
And the unions have gotten in on this.
They want to repopulate their membership now.
They see this as an opportunity to get wages up.
The Republican agribusiness types who are looking at illegals as a low wage base had better realize what's happening here because the process of making them legal is going to do exactly what you say.
It's going to raise their price.
Their demands for higher wages are going to be following very soon after they are granted this amnesty and become legal.
They're not going to sit around and put up with illegal type wages.
And so that's just going to lead to more importation of illegals.
There's no disincentive to turn this around.
Nobody's talking about deporting anybody.
But we are saying, where is the security on the border?
And where is the attempt to provide some disincentives to stem the tide?
And there's none of that in this.
It's just the exact opposite.
And it is a heinous attempt to corrupt the American electoral system.
And that's what really bugs me about this as much as anything else.
Val, you're great.
You ought to, do you do public speaking anywhere on things that you care about?
Just seminars and training I used to do with all my management.
I think that's about it.
All right.
Well, we're very fortunate you're in the audience.
I'm glad you called.
Thank you, Rush.
All right.
That's Val from Sanibel Island, Florida.
And we have to take an EIB obscene profit break.
We'll do that.
Be back right after this.
And we have a Rasmussen poll out on the immigration debate.
And the Republicans have gained ground in this poll.
Now, since everybody in Washington is so poll-oriented, maybe this poll will inspire some Republicans there.
In a political season, when most of the news has been bad for Republicans, the congressional debate over immigration has produced a bit of movement in favor of the GOP.
The latest Rasmussen reports, a national opinion survey found that 37% of Americans now trust Republicans more than Democrats on the issue of immigration.
Just 31% trust the Democrats more.
In late March, the two parties were perceived equally on the topic, 38% favoring the GOP, 37% favoring the Democrats.
Americans remain divided on the issue itself.
Just 41% favor letting immigrants move towards citizenship by paying a fine or paying back taxes and learning to speak Espanol or Anglais.
42% are opposed to this.
42% believe a barrier along the Mexican border would significantly reduce immigration.
39% disagree.
Still, 57% believe a barrier should be built.
Now, if this poll is accurate, you have a circumstance here where the Washington elites are 180 degrees out of phase with the citizens of the country.
And isn't it amazing to see the elected officials, primarily the Democratic Party, but there's some misguided Republicans too in the Senate, signing with non-citizens over the citizens in this debate.
That's how frightened they all are.
In other news, old Mahmoud, the president of Iran today, says that his country has successfully enriched uranium for the first time, I think to 3.5%, 3.5%, which is not military grade.
It's not weapons grade, but it is power, nuclear power grade.
This is a landmark, if true, in Iran's quest to develop nuclear fuel.
He insisted, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, that his country does not aim to develop nuclear weapons.
Now, yesterday, old Mahmoud was out there telling his country, tomorrow is going to be a great day.
We have some of the greatest news to announce tomorrow.
Be sure to pray and be thankful.
And this is the news, that they have enriched uranium in Iran.
Also, a story out there that some guy from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace claims he was at a meeting somewhere for the Council on Foreign Relations, and that American officials announced that there are indeed plans drawn up for a strike on Iran's nuclear sites for later this year.
So once again, the American left, the worldwide left, is far more concerned, far more fearful of what George W. Bush might do regarding Iran's nuclear capability than they are afraid or fearful of Iran gaining it.
Here's Jose in Coral Gables, Florida.
Hi, Jose.
Nice to have you with us.
I'm calling you to bring the attention of everybody in support from a different perspective to what Val said about the way that different groups are treated as far as immigration enforcement.
Have here in Florida people trying to come over from Cuba, and now they're interested seeing you're repatriated, which is, as we all know, not necessarily something that happen on the Rio Grant.
My theory on that is that you're dealing with a group of people that tends to be more self-sufficient, that tends to be a lot more capitalistic, entrepreneurial, and basically tend to vote more Republican than any other Hispanic group.
Well, now that is the key.
That's the key.
Now, correct me if I'm wrong on this, Jose, but the laws with Cuba right now is if Cubans make it to U.S. soil, they're automatically, they don't get sent back.
They're here and they're good to go.
If they're caught at sea by the Coast Guard, they're turned around and shipped back.
Correct.
Correct.
The reason for this is quite, you just nailed it.
The Cuban exile community in this country is so oriented toward Republicans.
The Democrats want nothing to do with it.
They don't want more Cubans in the country.
They don't want more people going to vote Republican.
They want to take their shot with the disadvantaged poor coming in from Mexico, who they think they can turn into wards of the state and create and expand entitlement programs, social welfare, and all the rest.
And that's the game plan here.
Well, also, the Cuban mentality doesn't fit that sort of guest voter program that seems to be the template for the Democratic Party right now.
You're breaking up a little bit.
What did you say?
The Cubans don't do the guest voter program?
Well, it seems to me that the real incentive for the Democrats to pursue this tack with immigration reform is not so much guest workers as guest voters.
Oh, exactly.
Guest voters, exactly.
They don't even care if they're illegal.
That's exactly right.
The guest voter program.
In fact, Jose, in honor of your call, I will occasionally refer to this Senate bill as the Guest Voter Act of 2006.
You have just nailed it.
Guest Voter Act.
He said in three words what I have been attempting to say eloquently and with many, many hundreds of words in the first hour of this program.
That's exactly what this is.
The Guest Voter Act or the Voter Amnesty Act or something along the line.
Voter amnesty, amnesty for voters, voters of amnesty.
Either of these things work and they are perfectly descriptive.
Thank you, Jose.
We got to go.
Quick time out.
We'll be back.
More after this.
Welcome back, folks.
Great to have you.
I was listening to a tune there, and I was my fault.
The clock, the clock's not at the right angle.
No, I'm going to stop making excuses.
I blew it.
I wasn't paying attention.
That was not a highly trained broadcast specialist act.
How much dead air was there?
Two seconds.
Well, a little dead air never hurt anybody.
In fact, dead air, other than some of our smaller stations on automation equipment, probably triggered some commercials to start running.
But dead air grabs your attention.
Back to the phones, Bruce and Union, New Jersey.
Welcome to the program.
Rush.
Yes.
Good afternoon, sir.
Thank you, sir.
This business that the Democrats are doing with these native Spanish speakers goes back to the 96 and 2000 elections when they fraudulently and specifically created citizens.
That has created voters by telling the INS to, A, call in everybody they could find that had a piece of paper in.
And virtually anybody who showed up, a felon, non-English speaker, et cetera, all became citizens, walked outside, and there, of course, was, you know, Ram Emmanuel or some clone saying, hey, why don't you vote Democrat?
Yeah.
And they're going to do that again.
I think they're saying, well, if we win the presidency and/or one of the wings of Congress, we can maybe pull this stunt again.
And so it's not so much the Voter Act of 2006.
They're looking for the Voter Act of 2010 or 2012 or something like that.
Oh, I know.
That's why I say there's time to head this off because we're not talking about these 10 to 12 million becoming voters this year.
That's not going to happen.
But I guarantee you, if the Democrats could find a way to get them to vote in this year's election, they'd do it.
Do not think that they wouldn't.
Here's what Bruce is talking about.
We have a story here by Jim Boulet Jr., who is executive director of English First, and this is from November 10th of 2000, after the election.
This is during the aftermath of Florida recount and so forth.
Americans who believe that Al Gore will graciously accept defeat should remember one thing.
Al Gore helped Bill Clinton trade permanent U.S. citizenship for Democrat votes in 1996 and beyond.
A Gore reinvention of a government program called Citizenship USA has been getting a closer look of late, thanks to David Shipper's book, Sellout.
Among other things, Shipper's reports are sources inside the INS revealed that in preparation for the 2000 elections, INS agents in the district offices were directed to relax the testing for English, complete every interview within 20 minutes, and ensure that all applicants passed the civics test by continuing to ask questions until an applicant got a sufficient number of them right.
Sometimes it was necessary to ask 20 or 25 questions before four or five were answered correctly.
Sellout also includes an appendix of documents which demonstrate Al Gore's direct involvement in turning Citizenship USA into a pro-Democrat voter mill in which English tests were waived and criminal records of prospective citizens swept under the rug in places like New York City, Chicago, Miami, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Houston, and Newark.
Each of these cities was located a key battleground state during the 96 presidential election.
Unfortunately, and ultimately, over a million new citizens were naturalized in time to vote for Clinton Gore in 1996.
And now that Bruce has reminded me of this, I remember this.
And, of course, this was 1996.
We didn't, I mean, Clinton's re-election was guaranteed, and we talked about this as more of the continuing corruption in the White House.
Yes, that's right, in the land of no controlling legal authority.
That was the Clinton Gore White House.
The end justified any means.
Accordingly, on February 15th, 1996, Henry Cisneros, then the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, forwarded a memo from the California Active Citizenship Campaign to President Clinton.
The memo noted, quote, INS in action will deny 300,000 Latinos the right to vote in the 1996 presidential elections in California.
On March 21st, 1996, a staff member of Gore's National Performance Review emailed a member of the vice president's staff.
I favored drastic measures to reduce the backlog.
If we don't get what we need, I will call for heavy artillery.
One day later, he reported success in an email addressed to Albert Gore at EOP/slash OVP On March 28th, Gore was sent another email which complained that we're going to have to, we have way too many people waiting for citizenship in November.
I can't make the INS head delegate broad authority to her field managers.
Can you?
Gore replied the same day.
We'll explore it.
Thanks.
The exploration soon ended.
The government citizenship procedures were indeed reinvented.
One obsolete regulation that bit the dust in 96 was the long-standing, and this is since 1907, requirement that a prospective citizen demonstrate a knowledge of English.
So as we refresh our memories on this, ladies and gentlemen, it is apparent that this has been a long-standing plan of the Democrats.
And once again, the clueless Republicans going right along with us because they haven't got the guts or the fear.
They have fear and haven't got the guts to stand up to this for the obvious reasons.
Here's Luke in Oceanside, California.
Great to have you with us, Luke.
Thanks for having me on the show.
You bet.
Basically, I'm just listening to the variety of speakers that you're having in regard to the whole immigration subject.
Myself, I'm from Australia.
I came here 11 months ago.
I entered the country legally on a visitor's visa.
Wait, wait, wait.
Did you say you came here illegally or legally?
No, I came legally to the country on a visa that has since expired.
That visa allows me just to visit the country for three months.
I then looked into becoming legal, but in order to become legal, I've needed money.
To get money, I need to work.
But I can't work legally.
So I'm put in a position where, in order to stay here, I would have to do things illegally.
So it's a catch-22.
For me, I mean, I love this country.
That's why I want to stay here.
But I'm put in a situation where, unless I go out and get someone pregnant and then live off welfare and the rest of it, there's very difficult for me to become legal.
And that's why.
Let's go back to the beginning, Luke, because I feel your pain and I understand your plight.
But I've got to ask you why you chose the method you chose.
If you chose a visa that was going to allow you to visit for three months and you knew that that was not a pathway to legal citizenship, why did you choose it?
Why didn't you go the legal pathway if you wanted to come here and become a citizen?
No, because I was actually informed that once I was here, I could actually put everything in process.
But I was misinformed.
Yes, you were.
I mean, that's what I mean.
It's a catch-22.
I don't want to do things illegally.
You know what I mean?
So now I'm stuck in a situation where I more than likely have to leave America, but I need to raise the finances to do that.
But why?
Why?
I mean, if you just hang around here long enough, the Congress are going to pass this bill and you're going to have amnesty.
You see, that's what I mean.
It seems as though the people that want to do it the correct way, I mean, I speak English.
I'm white.
I'm a skilled worker right there.
Well, the Democrats are not interested in you.
That's a problem.
I mean, it's just, it's ridiculous.
See, like I said, my whole point here is that it seems as though those who wish to do it illegally are automatically granted amnesty.
They're given, you know, they're given all this, you know, and because they're a majority.
You're exactly right.
It's got to be frustrating as hell.
Pardon?
Hello?
I said it's got to be, it's got to just puzzle you, make you mad, and so forth.
Exactly as you say.
I mean, the message is being sent loud and clear.
Come here illegally, come from a certain place, and we are going to grant you amnesty.
Exactly.
I'm still not sure that you wouldn't qualify for amnesty in this program since you're here.
I think you would.
It's just you sound like that's right.
Take it back.
You know, you're right.
You're not here five years.
You got to go back home and you got to pay a fine and you got to go English class.
Well, you understand they still may make you do it.
But it's only going to happen if you turn yourself in.
I'd roll a dice and hang in there and be tough.
Well, I mean, because there aren't any enforcement mechanisms in this bill to catch you.
Yeah.
Oh, and but that's the other thing.
I called up INS yesterday and told them that I was here over my visa.
I am illegal, and they didn't even want to do anything about it.
Of course not.
They're under orders not to.
What am I meant to do?
If anyone can answer that question, it's a catch-22.
Do I do it legally and then risk not being able to come back to the country, or do I sit here and wait and just be illegal?
Well, no, look, you've already made it plain.
You don't like the illegal route.
No, I don't.
And you can't make enough money being illegal anyway.
And the honest answer here is you need to pursue this in the legal fashion.
I mean, there's just, it's cleaner.
It's the best thing.
You're not going to be stigmatized.
You're making it plain here that you don't want to be stigmatized as an illegal.
That's right.
I love this country.
We love Australia, too.
I've found that.
But, yeah, it's just, I just wanted to make that quite clear to other listeners out there that those who do wish to go about becoming a citizen legally do find it quite difficult.
Well, you know, we do have quotas.
It's all based on assimilation.
This is nothing new.
It's been this way forever.
And it's so that we don't flood ourselves with more people that can assimilate at one time.
It takes time.
You know, immigration is one thing.
What we're talking about with his illegals, this is not immigration.
This is a job search.
And it's the Illegal Voting Rights Act of 2006.
But the only thing you can do is go back.
Australia is not a bad place to be and go through the process legally.
It's not designed to be easy.
And it's going to be tough because you've been here and you've loved the country and so forth.
But I mean, I and Mr. Snurdley, the official program observer here, is breaking out a cold sweat when I told you just to hang in and sit around and break the law.
That's just it.
He's not going to be breaking the law.
I've been thinking, thanks for the call, Luke.
I'm glad that you called.
I've been thinking about this.
What incentive is there for any of these people here illegally to leave?
There is none.
I mean, it may well, in order to make the point and drive it home, it may well be productive to just sit here and say to everybody, hey, if you're here, hang in there because your day is coming.
If you're here illegally, be patient because the Democratic Party and the American left are going to bail you out.
You don't have to feel stigmatized because there won't be a stigma.
Just hang in there.
If you can make ends meet until they get this bill passed, whoever knows when that's going to be, just to drive home the point.
Of course, I'm being facetious with this, but it does illustrate where we all are because that's really all they have to do.
And in fact, for those of you listening in Mexico, come on in.
There's nothing to stop you.
Nobody's going to be stopping you.
And as soon as you get here, you can get, well, yeah, come on in.
Two to five.
In fact, see, I told Luke that he has to go back to Australia because he's been here less than five years.
But there's no enforcement mechanism in the bill.
Unless Luke turns himself in, nobody's going to know.
Whoever hires him is not going to be punished.
They're not going to be tracking these people down.
That's not the point.
In fact, if you're listening in Guyana, if you're listening anywhere in the world, come on in because the Democrats need votes and there's nothing here that's going to stop you.
And the way to get in here is come across the southern border.
Don't come in one of the ports.
Don't put yourself on a container ship.
We'll find you if you put yourself in one of those containers.
We're looking at those.
But if you come to the southern border, man, the world is your oyster.
Fastest three hours in media.
I mean, we just keep speeding along here.
Steve in Kansas City, Missouri.
Nice to have you on the program, sir.
Hi, Rush.
Thanks for all you do.
I just had a comment.
I was driving around and I heard your clip on Ted Kennedy and his Spanish pandering to the Hispanic population.
I just wanted to know if your crew had checked out his interpretation because didn't Kennedy get expelled from Harvard for cheating on a Spanish exam before daddy's money got him back in?
He was suspended from Harvard.
Not expelled.
He was just well, I don't know if he was suspended from Harvard when he cheated.
He's caught getting another student to take a Spanish test for him.
Now, I don't know if that was what I mean, it's funny.
I don't know if that's what caused the, if he be expelled, but I know he was suspended for that.
I think he got expelled for a year or two before daddy's money got him back in.
Yeah.
Well, that's, that story is wild.
Yeah, Ted Kennedy is sorted past.
Which reminds me, we finally put together the repeater version of the Ted Kennedy at the 94 rally for Bill Clinton.
Mike, you have that handy?
Yeah, well, here it is.
Is this Clinton country?
It needs to be done for the next two and a half weeks.
And we elect Mark Roosevelt as our governor.
And you re-elect old Kennedy in the United States Senate.
We're going to start on the 96 campaign to elect Bill Clinton as a re-elect him on the next minute.
We're going to start on the 96 campaign to elect Bill Clinton as our re-elect him on the next minute.
And after we all do what needs to be done for the next two and a half weeks, and we elect Mark Roosevelt as our governor and you re-elect.
And you re-elect old Kennedy in the United States Senate.
We're going to start on the 96 campaign to elect Bill Clinton as a re-elect him on the next minute.
As a re-elect him on the next minute.
Is this Clinton country in the end?
Okay.
That's our boy Teddy Kennedy.
And he did not have a translator that day as he did yesterday at the illegal voter rally in New York.
Actually, he's at Washington.
Website note, we are going to repost the Limbaugh laws.
People asking for that to be posted again so they can see it.
That'll be up on the website, as well as the excerpts read earlier today from Jeff Sessions' speech on the floor of the Senate regarding the current education bill in the Senate.
Got to go, folks.
Back with more to close it out after this.
Hey, and while I'm at it, if you're Al-Qaeda, come on in over the southern border.
Democrats will take your votes as well.
We have the Limbaugh laws and the transcripts of the Jeff session speech already posted at the top of the homepage at rushlimbaugh.com.
Have a great day, folks, and night.
▲
Export Selection