All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 5, 2005 - Rush Limbaugh Program
36:44
December 5, 2005, Monday, Hour #1
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's edition of the Rush 24-7 podcast.
Have you seen the circus that the Saddam trial is turning into?
Have you happened to notice?
You probably haven't, which is why I'm going to point it out to you myself.
Have you happened to notice that Saddam's starting to use my idea, my suggested defense?
Strategy with his mouthpiece, Ramsey Clark.
You missed that?
See, I knew you'd miss it.
That's why I'm going to tell you.
Greetings, my good buddies, good friends, all across the fruited plane.
It's time for broadcast excellence.
Three straight hours of it.
We're ditto camming from the top.
Here at Rush Limbaugh.com.
Telephone number if you want to be on the program 800 282-2882.
Now, the uh couple, a couple housekeeping things.
Remember, military personnel around the world, not too late, not nearly too late to sign up for our Adopt a Soldier program.
Family members of military personnel can do the same.
Just go to Rush Limbaugh.com, fill out a quick little form that verifies your uh your military status that will match you with a donor and make you a complimentary subscriber to Rush 24-7 and the Limbaugh Letter newsletter, which will arm you with whatever kind of propaganda you're facing around the world.
Uh faced with the uh uh media, U.S. media, worldwide lib media, uh, when it comes to this country and our war on terror.
Another note, it's one week from today that we begin uh video podcasts of each day's morning update.
That's another value-added service to existing subscribers at Rushlimbaud.com.
In addition to the three-hour podcast of the radio program each day, we're going to video podcast, the morning update.
I record that it's about 90 seconds, not sixty, uh, as has been reported out there in the media.
We will um download those as a as a free value-added service uh to existing subscribers uh starting one week from today.
And this is just informational because if you're already a subscriber, there's nothing you have to do.
You you just you just well, you gotta get a video player if you don't have one if you want to use it, but I mean there's nothing additional you have to do as a subscriber to uh get well uh maybe I mean you may have to go online and and register to download it, but I'm in talking about additional price Zilch Zero Nada.
Looking forward to all of that, and we have further, we have additional video plans coming here at Rushlinbaugh.com as we head on down the uh highway of technological advancement.
All right, the Saddam Hussein trial.
By the way, also have amazing audio of John Kerry yesterday on Slay the Nation on CBS.
Since nobody watches that show, I'm gonna play this for you.
It's stunning.
I haven't seen anything about this in the uh in the media today, what Carrie said yesterday on television.
And Hillary was met with all kinds of wild protesters over the weekend.
We have audio of one such protest, uh, in which she uh she finally she she got to full screech level, uh trying to get them to shut up.
Oh, it's gonna be great.
But first the Saddam trial and its it's a circus, and it's thanks to former Lyndon Johnson attorney general, Ramsey Clark.
I mean, the bottom line here is folks that Saddam Hussein's already lived longer than he deserved.
Uh and I I've not heard a single leading Democrat denounce Ramsey Clark.
Have you?
And you won't.
I mean, we can barely find a Democrat that'll out there say that Saddam is good.
It's good that he's in captivity.
I mean, it's some it's in fact some Democrats are saying, and they're saying it quite openly, that the world would be better off if Saddam were back in power.
And I'm just I'm just telling you, that's gonna be part of his trial.
That's gonna be part of his defense.
This they're already starting to gin this up.
Um and the reason, you know, a lot of their base, a lot of the wacko lib base of the Democratic Party agrees with the notion that Saddam's a good guy.
Bush is the real terrorist, Bush is the real Hitler.
Saddam is just an innocent guy minding his own business, his own country, wouldn't hurt anybody, wasn't any weapons of mass destruction.
Everybody knows that now, don't you know?
So the Democrats, not only do they find it tough saying that he it's okay he's in captivity, more and more of them are saying that we should have never been taken out.
You know, I I I think we need to know where Howard Dean and all the rest of the Democrat Party leadership Stand on what Ramsey Clark is doing.
You know, you've heard of this group international answer, this supposed bunch of peace activists that run around trying to make the world safe for everybody.
That's a Ramsey Clark-related group.
And they stage a lot of these protests, not just here, but around the world as well.
And the left never denounces these people.
There risk so many, so many opportunities to expose these people for what they are.
But as I say, the Democrats can barely say that it's good that Hussein's out of office.
And uh, you know, you've got you've got LBJ's former attorney general representing a Hitler-like figure.
And they're secretly hoping he gets Saddam off.
I mean, that'd be the biggest embarrassment that Bush could have.
If Saddam is found not guilty by the Iraqis, and make no mistake, there are there are countless liberal Democrats in this country who are uh hoping for that.
And we got John Kerry out there undermining us just as he did in Vietnam.
But the little inkling here that you haven't heard.
This is a uh this is a story from the Times Online in the U.K. Former American attorney general advising Saddam Hussein's legal team has helped to map out a defense strategy that includes prolonging the ousta dictator's trial.
Ramsey Clark, who has pursued a career as a human rights lawyer since serving under LBJ from 67 to 69, met Saddam last week.
Later on in the story is this quote, Saddam asked Clark to pass on his greetings to the American people, telling Clark we must distinguish between the people and the leadership.
The majority of the American people know the truth about their leadership and how it lied to them.
So supposedly Saddam sells sells Ramsay Clark any idea, and who cares whose idea it really was.
This is just the first inkling.
If you remember, I said that Saddam has a slam dunk defense strategy.
All he's got to do is bring any number of Senate Democrats over as witnesses.
Bush lied.
There was no uh where there were no weapons of mass destruction.
The pre-war intelligence was all faked.
It was all made up.
Saddam should have his country back, but he can't get a fair trial because Bush has poisoned his reputation.
He's a child killer.
He used nerve gas.
Bush lied about everything Saddam did.
And now Saddam's in jail, but Saddam needs to get his country back because it was taken away from him illegitimately in an ignoble, unjust war.
And the Democrats in this country are saying I think what would be Saddam's best defense, and we're seeing little inklings of it here.
When Saddam asks Ramsey Clark to make sure the American people know the truth about their or that do know the truth about their leadership and how they were lied to.
So it's it's it's beginning now.
And and of course, John Kerry beginning to undermine the war in a big effort now, in a big way.
Let's go to the soundbite.
This is uh face the nation yesterday.
Bob Schiefer says uh Democrat Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, he takes a very different view, Senator Kerry.
He uh he says basically that we should stay the course because he says real progress is being made.
He says this is a war between 27 million Iraqis who want freedom and 10,000 terrorists.
He says we're in a watershed transformation.
What about that?
I don't agree with that.
But I think what we need to do is recognize what we all agree on, which is you've got to begin to set benchmarks for accomplishment.
You've got to begin to transfer authority to the Iraqis.
And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, uh uh uh you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the uh uh of of uh historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not.
Iraqis should be doing that.
And after all of these two and a half years, with all Iraqis ought to be terrorizing Iraqi women and children.
He did yes, he did.
Yes, he did just say, yes, cue it back up.
Mike, yes, he did.
He said, and there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women breaking sort of the customs of the historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not, Iraqis ought to be doing that.
Here, listen to it again.
If you didn't believe it the first time you heard it, listen to it again.
I don't agree with that.
But I think what we need to do is recognize what we all agree on, which is you've got to begin to set benchmarks for accomplishment.
You've got to begin to transfer authority to the Iraqis.
And there is no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, uh you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the uh uh of uh historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not, Iraqis should be doing that.
And after all of these two and a half years, with all of the talk of 210,000 people trained, there just is no excuse for not transferring what they're doing.
You know, they there's so much I I if I I'm sorry I even have to play this this this buffoon for you, but he's assumed the position of official Democrat Party spokesman on this.
He's putting himself out there, so we have to deal with it.
There's so much wrong with this.
You got to begin to transfer authority to the Iraqis.
What's been going on the last year and a half that he hasn't noticed?
Number one.
Number two, after all these two and a half years with all the talk of two hundred and thousand two hundred and ten thousand people trained, no excuse for not transferring more of that authority.
What are we in the process of doing?
All these people are trying to do is get get a how to get ahead of something that is already happening so they can take credit for it.
But this business that U.S. soldiers are terrorizing Iraqi women and children.
You now, if you doubted John Kerry during the 2004 presidential campaign, or if you doubted anybody, uh, the Swift boat vets, if you doubted anybody about him, you shouldn't now.
It is clear what he thinks of the U.S. military.
His view is common throughout the Democratic Party.
The only Senate Democrat who sounds like FDR or Truman right now is Joe Lieberman.
You've got the likes of John Kerry and Dick Durbin now, echoed by Harry Reid and Ted Kennedy as the voice of the modern Democratic Party, which despises the U.S. military and feels no compunction whatsoever to characterize them as terrorists.
Let's go back to October 9th of I'm sorry, let's April 22, 1971.
And this is Kerry testifying before the Senate for foreign relations committee about his tour in Vietnam.
They told the stories of times that they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals, and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies,
randomly shot at civilians, raised villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, not isolated incidents, but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with a full awareness of officers at all levels of command.
So he came back and he lied about atrocities that he never saw.
He accused men of committing these atrocities.
He never saw them.
He lumped himself in at some point with having participated in them, but he never saw these things committed.
That truth has come out.
He has not seen U.S. soldiers terrorize kids and children in the dead of night in Iraq, and yet he can't help it because this is who he is.
And who he is is a carbon copy of today's modern Democratic Party.
This is how they view the American military man and woman.
This is how they view their own country.
We are the terrorists.
We brutalize, we're the barbarians, we are cowards, we do things like this under cover of darkness.
It is shocking to have to play this stuff for you, but I feel compelled to do it because so many people still want to have their head in the sands about all this.
How much longer do we have to pretend these people are patriots?
How much longer do we have to do that, folks?
We've got Ramsey Clark, John Kerry, Dick Durbin, Ted Kennedy, who and and of course he said that our running of Abu Grab prison was no different than a change of management.
In fact, we're doing it just as badly and doing just as rotten things as Saddam did.
They don't speak like patriots, folks, and they don't act like patriots.
In this comment, John Kerry is anti-American.
He's trying to get away with making you think he is pro-American and pro-military because we're in a situation that the president put us all in that's untenable and it's not these people's fault, it's all Bush's fault, but make no mistake, that's not how this is heard around the world.
This is cheered by our enemies.
This is not patriotism, this is not patriot speech, not patriot actions.
Uh this is pure anti-American, anti-U.S.
military.
And these are the mouthpieces of the Democratic Party today who are assigned the effort of saying these things.
Constantly slam our own country, pretending that they're slamming Bush.
And it's, I mean, they hate Bush, there's no question.
But they have to know that they're pounding our institutions and the people who support them know it.
International Answer, Code Pink, all these other loon left-wing peace groups, all part of the same organization.
They are invested in our defeat.
They are now agitating for our defeat.
They are seeking our defeat.
And I, for one, find nothing patriotic about it.
Back after this.
Stay with us.
Prominent now in the uh bumper music rotation, Manheim's steamroller, El Rushbow, America's anchor man.
Pay no attention to what you've heard in the press release from ABC that Elizabeth Vargas, and what's this other guy's name, Bob Woodruff are the new uh anchors for the ABC uh World News Tonight or what I am America's anchor man, firmly ensconced in the prestigious at Till of the Hun chair here at the Limbaugh Institute.
So you got Durban comparing interrogators and military personnel and uniform to pole pots thugs, Nazi gulag operators, Soviet gulag operators, and Nazi uh Nazi uh soldiers and so forth, and of course, all hell descended on Durban after that.
I'm just wondering if this comment by Kerry will cause a similar crescendo.
I mean, when he actually has gone out now and repeated what he said in April of 1971, those were total lies in 1971.
He couldn't substantiate these allegations he was making.
And now he comes back and basically accuses young soldiers, American soldiers, of terrorizing Iraqi kids and children, and breaking their historical and religious customs, and that there's no reason for this and it and that it must stop.
This is clearly agitating for defeat.
It's a disguised attempt here, folks, at ripping Bush.
But this is an all-out assault on their own country.
These people are not courageous.
Doesn't take any guts for Carey to go to the Senate floor or to go on face the nation in front of a friendly audience and say what he says.
They like to think of themselves as courageous, but that term is misused usually by them to define their opposition to the war.
What these people are doing is not gutsy.
It doesn't take courage or guts to do what they're doing at all.
It's the easiest thing in the world.
Liberalism is the easiest, most gutless choice anybody can make.
Courage is speaking for freedom while faced with tyranny, not speaking for tyranny while living in freedom.
And these people are advocating tyranny by suggesting Saddam shouldn't have been deposed.
Maybe we shouldn't even proceed with this trial, that Saddam was uh the Iraqis are better off.
I mean, these are the people that claim folks to have all these interests in human rights and civil rights and freedom and love and tolerance.
And they're willing to consign the Iraqi population back to this thug dictator and all of his evil and all of his horrors, and at the same time they want to be called courageous for doing so.
Well, this is the exact opposite of courage.
Courage is when you are tyrannized, when you're living in tyranny and you dare speak up for your own freedom.
These people are living in freedom, they're protected by it, and they are speaking up for tyranny.
And you gotta add Jimmy Carter to this list.
Carter and Bill Clinton as well.
Carter in many ways is difficult to distinguish from Ramsey Clark, because Carter's out there currently constantly embracing dictators, come Castro to that potbellied little little fool in North Korea, Kim Jong il, or Kim Jong il, Kim Il Jung, whatever they go by.
Always it's out there traveling the world denouncing us.
Clinton himself often comes close, but he pulls back.
He pulled, he'll go over to Dubai and rip the soldiers.
He will not call them terrorists, but he'll demoralize them and attempt to make illegitimate their effort.
Then he'll come back and change his mind when he's speaking to an American audience.
I guess he thinks this is courage, too, telling an audience what it wants to hear.
Even trying to triangulate the war.
And in the meantime, you've got Joe Lieberman, who is the black sheep of this party because he speaks the truth and defends his country.
But he's totally ignored.
He's an outcast in his own party.
Instead, you've got people like Cindy Sheehan and John Mertha lauded, praised, because they undermine the war and in the process undermine their country.
And then you've got the media.
Nothing more than the Democrat National Committee House organ, the Democrat National Committee Times, the Democrat National Committee NBC, the DNC ABC.
And it's sickening.
It is just sick.
And they must pay a price.
The Godfather of Talk Radio, Il Rushbox executing a signed host duties flawlessly, benevolent dictator.
I'm a benevolent, not a godfather.
That has that has uh bully type uh connotations to it.
Anyway, we're back.
800-282-2882.
Listen to this again.
John Kerry faced the nation yesterday.
Again, nobody watches this show, and that's why you may have missed this.
There's no reason, Bob, that young American soldiers need to be going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, uh uh uh you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the uh uh of of uh historical customs, religious customs, whether you like it or not.
Iraqis should be doing that.
Now, is it me or does this man sound like he has dementia?
He just blabs away.
If you saw the whole appearance, he just blabs away, says whatever enters his mind, regardless of it's uh regardless its possible effect on our troops, regardless whether it makes any sense.
He just says as long as as long as he's being paid attention to, he will pursue any hapless effort again at winning the presidency.
But it's totally hapless.
Don't forget uh this is the guy, and he the reason he does this is because he knows that he's never going to be scrutinized by the press.
That that pitiful performance of his outside the White House last week, where he contradicted himself inside of six sentences about his policies, uh, troop withdrawal, whether it would work or not work.
It was one of the most incoherent, convoluted things he said since I voted before it for it before I voted against it.
But he he's confident that he can he can get away with this because he knows he's not going to be scrutinized.
Remember, this is the guy.
When CBS and a bunch of the press were running around asking him some questions, he gave this long winding answer that nobody could make sense of, and CBS said, Senator, would you you want to do another take on that?
We don't we don't have a sound bite in there.
Now, rather than air it as rambling incoherence in vain search of a cogent thought, the media gives him take two.
Which is what he got.
And in this case, he says this.
There's no outrage from Bob Schiefer.
There's not even a raised eyebrow from Bob Schiefer.
There's a, you know, stroke the lore, stroke the chin with the hand, and give it considerable thought.
Why, Senator, you may be on something.
Hmm.
It's just, it's just absurd.
But at this, at the same time, all these people think they're being courageous.
Kerry, I'm sure thinks this is a great act of courage, just like he thought when he said April 22, 1971 was a great act of courage.
Now back to this business of uh of Ramsey Clark, because it is clear to me now, and I'm I I was half joking, but I was half warning you when I said, get ready because Saddam's best defense is to simply repeat in this court in Baghdad exactly what people like John Kerry and Ted Kennedy and Dick Durbin have been saying about Bush lying, about the war being unnecessary, unjust, there were no weapons of mass destruction, and Bush knew it.
The intelligence was cooked, all these things.
That's Saddam's best defense.
All he's got to do Is just quote these guys, maybe ask them, subpoena them, come over as character witnesses.
And we got the first inkling that this is the way Ramsey Clark is thinking.
From this story from the Times Online, Saddam asked Clark to pass on his greetings to the American people, telling the former attorney general, we must distinguish between the American people and their leadership.
The majority of the American people know the truth about their leadership and how it lied to them.
The Times says this was taken as a reference to pre-war claims, which later proved unfounded that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.
Oh, it's only the starting point.
Well, let me tell you something, folks.
Deliberately lying, deliberately lying by saying that President Bush lied about pre-war intelligence has created an intolerable situation.
Saddam Hussein was listening, and so's his lead attorney Ramsey Clark.
They are going to use the Democratic Party's words to bolster Saddam's case, that his country was illegally invaded, and that Saddam's regime was the victim of American imperialism and cowboys.
You know it's coming.
This is just the first little indication of it.
Now, what we have here is a Democrat Party political stunt that's gone wild.
It's out of control.
It was a clever little ploy.
They wanted to drive down Bush's poll numbers to weaken his credibility, which is his strongest asset.
It would have been a Hall of Fame political stunt had Saddam not been waiting for his trial.
Democrats could have laughed themselves silly about pulling a fast one on the American people as to what really happened as we prepared to remove a truly grave threat to Iraq, the Middle East, our own country and the world.
And yet here they have the Democratic Party, wittingly or unwittingly, I'm not sure which yet, provided a very powerful yet false theory of defense to the um incarnation of Adolf Hitler Jr.
Let's go back and listen to some quotes.
John Kerry, February 23rd, 1998.
Saddam Hussein's already used these weapons and has made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy to continue to do so.
That is a threat to the stability of the Middle East.
It is a threat with respect to the potential terrorist activities on a global basis.
It is a threat even to regions near, but not exactly in the Middle East.
John Kerry, February 23rd, 1998.
Bush was still in Texas, holding barbecues, roasting Ma Richards, and drinking Lone Star Longnecks.
He wasn't even in Washington.
Here's John Kerry, October 9th, 2002.
I'll be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our country.
Three months later, January 23rd, 2003, John Kerry, without question, we need to disarm Saddam.
He is a brutal murderous dictator leading an impressive regime.
He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation.
Now he's miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.
His consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction must not be allowed to continue.
January 31st, 2003, just eight days later.
If you don't believe Saddam is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn't vote for me.
Here's John Kerry yesterday on Face the Nation.
When asked about all of this, Bob Schiefer says at one point you did vote for the resolution authorizing the president to take military action.
If you knew then what you know today, would you have cast that vote?
No.
And what changed your mind?
Why did you do that and what has changed since you did that?
Well, so much has changed since I did it, but I did it.
You know, I did it for the simplest of reasons.
I uh believed the evidence that we were given, number one.
I believe the word of the President of the United States when he said he would do what he promised us with respect to how he'd take us to war if he did.
The exhaustion of the remedies of the United Nations, the inspections, the planning, the caution, all of those things.
He did not You know, this is uh this is why I think the man's demented.
I really wonder if he's got dementia.
First place, he said in 1998 Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons.
So how in the world can anybody have lied to him if he already knew five years ago that Saddam Hussein already used these weapons?
He further said Saddam's made it clear that he has the intent to continue to try by virtue of his duplicity and secrecy to continue to do so, meaning weapons of mass destruction.
Now, Kerry yesterday says that Bush lied to him.
Well, Clinton had to lie to him because Clinton was the one putting this information out.
Madeline Albright was putting it out.
Sandy Burglar was putting it out.
Tom Dashell bought into it.
Ted Kennedy bought into it.
They all bought into it back in 1998.
And all of a sudden George Bush lied.
And that takes me back to this little stunt that they've pulled off, this little political stunt that's gone wild.
All it was was a clever little ploy to drive down Bush's poll numbers.
And now this stunt, which is not based in any truth whatsoever, the real lie, the real lie is the Democrats lying about what President Bush said to them about weapons of mass destruction and all this pre-war intelligence.
That's the real lie.
The real lie is the Democratic Party's number one talking point today.
And they end up with this little stunt providing a defense to Hitler Jr.
Saddam Hussein.
What are they going to do now?
What are you going to do now?
Pretend this isn't a story.
They're going to minimize the fact that Saddam's Democrat attorney general, Ramsey Clark, or attorney, has adopted the words of American Democrats to use against Saddam's prosecutors.
I mean, they've really put themselves in a hell of a position here.
They're going to lie again about what they said.
Will they defend Saddam?
Are they going to they some of them already are.
Some of them already are saying that Iraq could be better off with Saddam still in power.
The next thing for them to say is give Saddam his country back when we get out.
If they want to be consistent, if these Democrats want to stop their lies, what they need to do now is instead of demanding Iraqi control like Kerry and his demented state is doing, just go all the way, Democrats, go all the way, libs, and say that when we pull out of there, we let Saddam out of jail and let him have his country back.
Maybe we even go in and redecorate his palaces for him as a show of apology for all of the horrors that we have committed, all the terrorist acts that the U.S. has committed.
Because U.S. soldiers are brutalizing and terrorizing Iraqi women and kids, according to John Kerry yesterday.
The least we can do is call it the Durban Plan, the Durban Kerry Plan.
We rebuild Saddam's palaces.
We give him some new limousines.
Hybrids.
Hybrid limousines for John Kerry and Dick Durbin to personally present to Saddam Hussein.
So he can protect the environment over there at the same time he goes back and assumes his rightful place as president and leader of Iraq.
Oh, yeah, and let him start the oil for food program back up.
Let him do that.
Let him bring the United Nations in.
We were evil to stop that.
We were evil to investigate that.
This has all been a Bush campaign to try to smear the great reputation of Saddam Hussein, one of the great magnanimous leaders in world history.
A man who did more for his people than Bush wants to do for the people of the United States.
Bush only cares about the rich.
Saddam cared about everybody.
So we redecorate his palaces.
I'm sure the Democrats have plenty of left coast interior designers that can go over there and do a bang-up job.
And let's get those people that we put in the mass graves because everybody knows Bush faked that.
Saddam didn't rape anybody, Saddam didn't have these mass torture rooms.
We did that.
We produced all that just like Abu Ghrab.
That's who we really are.
Let's go have proper burials for these people in mass graves put there by George W. Bush, all because he lied about weapons of mass destruction.
And then we can even televise on the Today Show before Katie Currick leaves to go anchor to CBS Evening News.
We can put on a today show, send her over there to have a Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade type coverage of Saddam being reinstalled as president.
And we could have Durban over there, we can have Kerry over there, we'd have the whole Democratic Party.
Ramsey Clark will become the official attorney general of Iraq while maintaining his American citizenship.
Folks, this is the only thing we can do.
This is where the Democrats' little stunt now requires them to go.
Saddam's the hero, Saddam's the victim, Saddam's the good guy.
The prosecutors are just agents of Bush and probably that cholaby guy.
Who needs to be on trial?
Cheney.
Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Bush, and that's what we need to do to continue the process after we reinstall Saddam in power and we redecorate his palaces, and we give him a fleet of hybrid limousines.
We then take Bush and Cheney over to the same jail and put them on trial.
That's where this Democrat stunt is going.
Because if they are being truthful now with themselves, this is where it has to go.
Bush is the evil guy.
Saddam's the good guy.
Saddam heard it.
Saddam's going to start using Democratic words more frequently in his defense.
They have really stepped in their own extra.
You put a you put a bag of excrement in front of them, and they will step in it.
And to get out of it, they will have to zigzag out and they'll step in another bag if you put it in the right place.
Take a quick timeout.
We'll be back and continue in just a moment.
Stay with us.
As long as the Democrats are at it, why stop with uh just putting Saddam back in power in Iraq?
Everybody, I mean, if you get them to admit it, everybody wants to get rid of Kofi Ann and he's a real culprit in the oil for food program.
Let Saddam be the Secretary General of the UN and run Iraq.
UN just lost some election, babe.
I've got that story somewhere here in the stack.
And he, after all, in the last elections, before Bush's unjust lied about war started, and before Saddam was illegally deposed and thrown out of power, he got 99% of the vote.
Who is more popular than Saddam Hussein?
The Democrats, I mean, they they they they owe it to us to follow this policy out as they have articulated it.
If they're being honest with us, if they're telling us the truth that Bush lied, that none of this was necessary, that American soldiers are terrorists, that they're that they're brutalizing women and children.
We need to put this man in power now.
Dispense with this whole trial.
The trial is nothing more than a continuation of Bush lied.
It's nothing more than a sham.
Saddam needs to be taken out of jail this afternoon, put back in power in one of his palaces, and we need to get the hell out of there.
That's where this Democrat policy is going.
Fair to be honest about it.
How how can how can how can a Democrat, and we know who these liberals are, how can they in good conscience think that Bush lied?
The war was unjust and illegal.
We had no business kicking Saddam out because he had no weapons of mass destruction, and yet they're allowing elections to determine some new form of leadership, leaving Saddam out.
Why none of this is just.
None of this is legal if everything else they're saying is true.
Saddam needs to be put back in power now.
And this whole democratic process wherever they are in the Constitution, wherever they are and everything else they're voting on.
Scrap it.
It's all a sham.
It's all a Bush show, isn't it?
Bush lied about everything.
Interesting story from the Boston Herald.
It's actually an editorial Sunday, November 27th this year.
President Bush and Vice President Cheney insists that Democratic war critics in Congress saw the same pre-war intelligence that they did.
John Kerry says that's just plain not true.
Well, it turns out that the relatively obscure conservative weekly, as they say in the Boston Globe, human events, relatively obscure to them, yes, has an interesting sideline on this dispute.
It called attention to a Washington Post report 18 months ago that said no more than six senators and a handful of House members read beyond the five-page summary of the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, concluding Iraq had all these WMDs.
The 92-page estimate was provided by the CIA to all members of Congress before they had to vote October 11, 2002.
Senator J. Rockefeller, vice chairman of the uh intelligence committee earlier this month repeated that only six senators had read the document, saying he was one, and the committee chairman Pat Roberts was another.
Diane Feinstein uh uh who prodded Bush to make sure the estimate was finished in time was another.
Lieberman couldn't remember if he read it.
Hillary declined to say, but John Kerry admits that he did not read it.
He said I got a personal briefing at the Pentagon, which is not the equivalent.
That's when he was running for president.
Well, here's what he's actually doing here, folks.
He did it for the simplest of reasons.
Politics.
He thought a vote against the war would make him look weak on national securities.
He wanted to look strong on the war on terrorism.
It did in fact help him get the nomination.
This vote, now he views it as a problem for nomination 2008, so he's lurched left.
But he didn't even look at the pre-war intelligence about which he now says he was lied to.
In fact, only six members of Congress read the whole thing.
And that's from the Washington Post.
Back after this, stay with us.
When we come back, uh some interesting audio tape of Hillary Clinton being protested by her own supporters.
Sit tight.
Second hour of the EIB Network is straight ahead.
It'll happen on a jiffy.
▲
Export Selection