The Rudy Giuliani Show dissects U.S. military readiness for a potential Iran strike, led by Admiral Cooper’s briefing and fleet deployments in the Mediterranean, Persian Gulf, and Indian Ocean, targeting IRGC nuclear sites like Parchin. Guest Jay Furman warns of Muslim Brotherhood-linked infiltration in Texas, citing CARE and madrasas, while Giuliani ties Trump’s leadership to defending cultural values against perceived threats. The episode also scrutinizes Epstein’s case, Colleen Maxwell’s credibility, and FBI misconduct under Biden, framing it as a pattern of legal overreach. [Automatically generated summary]
This is Rudy Giuliani, and this is the Rudy Giuliani show on Lindel TV.
And here we are in the middle of the well, where is that ship, that warship, great-looking warship?
That is the USS Gerald Ford.
That's Gerald Ford?
It looks small, doesn't it?
I'm going to tell you the strangest thing.
You know, the port of New York is a great port because it's deep.
So, what that means is you can bring a ship right up to the street, which is the reason why New York was such a great port for so long.
And the reason why most of the submarines built in the Second World War, not submarine, sorry, most of the aircraft carriers built in the Second World War, including the very famous Intrepid, which is now resting in New York, were built in the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
Because on the Brooklyn side of the shore, even on the East River, it's very deep.
And on the Hudson River, it's very deep until they made the John F. Kennedy.
And the John F. Kennedy, when we used to have Fleet Week every year in New York when I was the mayor, and the Navy would bring in six or seven ships for New Yorkers to inspect and to look at.
And maybe because maybe because we were the place that took the Intrepid, I don't know.
I don't know how long we had Fleet Week.
It was predated me, and it continues.
I loved it.
And then an allied Navy would bring their ships in.
But when the Kennedy came, it had to be anchored outside of the Verrazzano Bridge because it was the first ship that was too big to come into New York port in ever.
And the new Queen Mary, the two of them.
But every other ship can come into New York port.
So that is the Most lethal, most powerful warship in the world.
It can almost virtually on its own, I shouldn't say on its own, it brings with it a carrier group, which is probably 50 times greater than most of the armadas that have sailed the ocean.
So just so that we can see, can we connect?
I do want to show you what's going on.
So yesterday when we were discussing this, I think I mentioned to you that one of the critical things that hadn't taken place yet that, or that I should actually say, we're not sure had taken place, it could have taken place without our knowing, not that the press knows everything, right?
Is that he needed to be briefed in great detail by Admiral Cooper.
And Admiral Cooper is the commander who reports directly to the Secretary of War.
For some reason, this isn't going through the Joint Chiefs, or maybe that's the way it works.
I don't know.
But it's Cooper to Hagset to Trump.
That's the final word on are we going to strike, or are we going to strike?
Also, the final word on the strategy we are going to follow.
The president today had that briefing, and that's been announced publicly.
So no one's telling any secrets out of school.
Admiral Cooper gave him a briefing.
Best I can tell, it lasted about an hour and a half, possibly two.
Hagsett was there.
I imagine the people relevant to the decision-making.
Is the Secretary of State in town or is he over in the Middle East?
I would imagine we'd want him in town.
It seems to me we're very close.
And it also seems to me a decision has been made.
Here's the real question, which we're going to explore during this show, both now and then later.
In the second half of the show, we're going to have Walid Ferris as a guest and we'll explore with him as well, which is what I'd say with 95% certain there'll be an attack.
The question is, what kind of an attack?
Singular, multiple, multiple in one night over a number of nights.
Speculators, people speculating on this who have experience and knowledge, say the fleet is large enough to sustain a multi days and months attack on them.
But I don't, I don't, this is not going to be, I doubt it's going to be long.
Attacking IRGC Installations00:15:26
I do hope it's more than symbolic.
I do hope it knocks them out and we're finished with them.
Because this regime has done more harm to the world than any group but maybe Red China, maybe the Soviet Union, maybe and Hitler's Germany.
I'd say those three probably exceed them.
But aside from that, and in recent times, modern times, they're pretty much pretty close to the worst.
And they stand in the way of peace in the Middle East.
And they stand in the way of the Muslim religion maturing to a religion that gets beyond Muhammad.
The fleet that's there is massive.
I would say what we're going to look at is, number one, possibly not in this order, but taking out the IRGC and the IRGC installations as much as possible to make it possible for the dissidents who have actually shown now that they can do battle,
having attacked Monday, the compound, the gigantic compound of the Ayatollah, having taken casualties themselves and caused casualties.
They're prepared to do that in various parts of Iran.
Obviously, the more the IRGC is degraded, both in terms of weapons and personnel, the easier it'll be for them to accomplish their purpose.
The NCRI, which is the main group, not the baby Shah, who isn't there, isn't in contact with it, and is working through the regime, it seems, and has already just about started a civil war with the Kurds by saying that they will not be part of any government that he runs, which his father accomplished by killing him.
So I don't know if he's going to do the same thing, but it seems to me he blew any chance he had of being taken seriously when he decided that he had the same dictator's understanding of the role of ethnic minorities in Iran that his dictator father and grandfather had.
And you can have this happen and then have the first thing that happen, a civil war, which is what would happen under the son of a dictator, a murderer, a thief, and a person who left behind a trail of blood that is still remembered in Iran.
And when you say, well, we're not going to visit the sins of the father on the son, the only reason the son is at all considered is because of the father.
The son has done nothing in his life to suggest that he could do anything difficult.
He's never had a job.
He did get trained to fly for one year.
The only time he ever volunteered to fly, it was to defend the regime of terror.
And he's been in constant contact with the IRGC over the last two years, numbering 50 to 100,000, according to him.
Which would be hard to do without committing a crime since they're a terrorist group.
But in any event, this is what the carrier group looks like.
If I can just put it on here.
Someone is up.
of course the background what we have that that's a uh the uss gerald ford uh along with there we go You gon?
You got one?
Yeah.
These are the nuclear facilities that exist.
Now, the question is, and yesterday there was a real yesterday there was a real attempt to try to To try to say, well, there's no reason for this attack because as best the UN could tell, there has been no enhancement of any significance since the attack.
But then the UN analyst did sort of say the following, which is the best reason for an attack.
He believes that they retained a great deal of their enriched uranium.
So if that's so, well, then that's the reason that's another reason for the attack.
Get rid of that uranium.
And whether we're going to go back and hit all of those again, I imagine our intelligence will guide us as to the ones where there either is enrichment that we didn't get the first time,
which I think is definitely a possibility, if not a reality, or where they've done some enrichment, or where they are going to pretty soon do it.
So let's take it out.
Also, notice on this list are not just nuclear sites and uranium mines, but reactors and military sites.
And toward the middle where you see parching there.
Do they see parching?
Not yet, Mayor, but we got to bring this up on our end.
Well, in the desert right outside of Tehran, to the east of Tehran, is a gigantic desert where recently it was discovered, and recently means over the last year, recently it was discovered that like they were doing a lot of very, very advanced enrichment, they were doing a lot of advanced extensions of their capacity to deliver nuclear warheads.
They're extending the range and the length of their missiles.
And they were doing it on a crash basis and doing it quite effectively in an isolated part of the desert area.
I have a picture of Parchin right now to put up.
Okay.
Put that up if we can.
And this is an area that's going to need to be hit harder because here they have done a lot of work.
The parchment's right there next to Tehran.
Gee, it's hard to see for me.
I don't know if they can see it.
They can see it.
They can see it.
If they can see it.
The map I have here is much better, but somehow we can't get it on there.
That's not connected.
Tom.
Yeah.
I'm trying.
I'm working on it.
Okay.
All right.
Okay.
Oh, there is Parchin.
I see it up there at the top.
Notice it's very close to Tehran.
And it's quite big.
So it takes up a great deal of that area.
But in that area, they have below ground sites where they're not doing enrichment.
They're working on rockets and making the rockets a much longer range.
I've seen contrary reports on this.
Some reports say they have rockets that are capable of reaching the United States.
Others say they do not.
And the majority or the probably the stronger opinion is that they don't.
We're going to talk about Korea later.
And I was surprised to see when I checked on this yesterday and today that, again, there's a dispute as to whether the Korean rockets could reach continental United States.
But the majority of opinions would say that they could.
We're talking about North Korea now, not Iran.
So that will be their target.
I'm sorry you're not able to see it.
And what we have to hit that is just an incredible number of ships.
We've got a fleet in the Mediterranean.
We have a fleet in the combination of the Persian Gulf, the Arabian Sea, and the Indian Ocean.
Now, the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea, there you go.
You can see all those ships, the ones that would be, when you're looking at the screen to your right, that whole group going down there, that's a combination of first the Strait of Hormuz, then depending on the side you're on, the Arabian Sea or the Persian Sea.
Are you on the Saudi side or the Iranian side, and then the Indian Ocean?
And looks like it's a traffic jam there, Ted.
So what that would indicate is, sure, they're there for defensive purposes to defend the 14 or 15 or so bases that we have in the region.
But the bases are pretty capable of defending themselves also.
Remember, they all have defensive capacity.
So I have to imagine we're looking at a fairly massive attack intended to completely eliminate any possibility of there being nuclear and frankly to eliminate the regime for good and forever.
So let's see.
We'll be waiting all weekend.
It may not happen over the weekend.
I wouldn't be surprised, though, if it did.
The talks, as far as we can tell, the talks are not going well.
The Iranians put out very, very, I shouldn't say very positive.
The Iranians were quite willing to say there was a lot of progress made.
I didn't see any Americans say that, that progress was made.
I didn't see a statement from Jared.
I did see one from the, I think it was an official statement that basically said that things still had to be, there were a lot of things that still had to be worked out, but it didn't say it went very, very, didn't say it went very, very, it went very, very well.
We did report to you, and we are going to go into more detail on that later, that on Monday, the MEK carried out a very bold and brave strike on the, it's called the Moto Hari complex.
And it's inside Khomeini's, or it is, or it surrounds Khomeini's compound.
And the Iranian newspapers, although they've softened the news lately, originally were quite shocked and reported, quote, heavy casualties to the Iranians.
On the MEK side, the casualties we know because the MEK, the MEK, you know, tells the truth, lost 100 fighters and the rest returned.
The rest meaning about 200 more.
So they lost about a third of their forces and believe that they at least inflicted equal equal damage to them.
Now, the 100 were not all.
The 100 that they are counting are either dead or arrested.
They haven't returned.
They're not certain. that they were all killed.
They know from the reports that some were killed and some were captured.
And they're missing 100 people.
And they believe that they had killed an equal or larger number of IRGC.
And they were exceedingly close to the residents of the Ayatollah.
If that area were to be cleaned out by air, then getting to the Ayatollah would be much, much easier.
The main target was the residence of Mochtaba Khomeini, who I believe is his son and his designated heir, if there is a designated heir.
It's also the location of the Guardian Council, the Assembly of Experts, the Judiciary, the Intelligence Ministry, and the Supreme National Security Council.
And the group there that's of great importance is the Assembly of Experts.
They pick the successor to the Ayatollah.
And if the Ayatollah is taken out and they're all taken out, there'll probably be anybody to pick an Ayatollah.
Oh, my.
They won't have somebody that can go around the wall killing people because they don't want to be Muslims.
Hmm.
So the reports at the time, the reports at the time reported simultaneous attacks on Khamenei's residents and specifically focused on the Supreme National Security building.
So it's giving us a pretty good indication of a target that could be very, very helpful to the target that could be extremely helpful to the U.S. forces.
The two main carriers are USS Gerald Ford and the USS Lincoln.
The Ford brings with it a number of destroyers.
The Lincoln brings with it a number of destroyers.
High Stakes, Hopeful Response00:02:48
So everything is ready.
And the stakes are extremely high.
Of course they are.
And the warnings from General Kaine, if they're correct, some people say they're not, but if they are, of course, are self-evident.
Of course, this is very, very dangerous.
And we are hopeful that we can contain their response, but we can't be unrealistic about it.
This is a regime that's been there for 47 years and it starves its people in order to support terrorism and build up its military.
Now, it is true The defense they put up against Israel, which was minimal, and the defense they put up against us, which was non-existent, may have been not to waste precious assets.
So we can't be absolutely certain that that is not going to be the case today.
Now, we are very hopeful everybody will be safe.
So be safe.
Be safe.
So the UN agency, this would be from Rafael Grasso Grossi, who is the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Although he did say there's no significant evidence of enrichment over the last number of months after they were pounded, does say that he has the firm impression that Iran's stockpiles of highly enriched uranium still lie buried at the site's bomb last June.
So Mr. Grossi, who was saying that in order to suggest that we didn't have to bomb because they have it enriched, certainly doesn't seem he may be an expert on the amount of enrichment.
He sure isn't a military expert.
The fact that we weren't successful, according to him, in taking out in taking out highly enriched uranium is a good reason to bomb him again, because that was the whole purpose of the first one.
Well, the president today was in Texas on his way to here, where he probably is arriving probably in about an hour.
Texas Vote Drama00:15:11
Let's so before his speech, Mayor, he stopped by a Whataburger, which is a restaurant chain in Texas.
And we have some video of President Trump at Whataburger.
Welcome, Mr. President.
We got you some shakes.
Now that trucker looks good.
Look at that.
That sucker never hears your point.
Mr. Griffin.
I probably shouldn't eat this one.
I should get a different one at random.
But I trust him.
I tell you, see?
That's funny.
I got Pepsi tonight, though, Mayor.
I tell you, when you're with him, when you're with him, you drink so much Diet Coke.
With you, I drink so much Diet Coke.
Well, yeah, I do too.
I mean, I'm not saying that he's the cause of it, but when I was representing him and spending a lot of time at the White House, as soon as I showed up, as soon as I showed up, you know, people who bring him a Diet Coke immediately, usually sometimes two, would bring out two, would bring out two for me right away.
They picked it up right away.
There he is dancing.
So where, so he was.
Corpus Christi.
He was in Corpus Christi.
Well, that's really south and not terribly far from Florida.
And this is a rally for the Republican primary.
Right.
The primary is Tuesday in Texas, yes.
But he didn't.
Who was with him?
Any other candidates?
Was it Cornyn?
And there's Paxton?
Right.
We did not see.
And who's the other?
Who's the third?
Wesley Hunt.
Wesley Hunt.
Wesley.
Wesley.
Wesley Hunt.
Tell me who Wesley Hunt is.
I mean, I'm not.
He was a congressman.
He's trying to run in kind of a conservative lane.
And we'll see if we can't.
We'll bring up some polling and some pictures.
So the thought is that Paxton comes out first of the three.
But then when it becomes Paxton against Cornyn, what?
Cornyn picks up more of Wesley Hunt's vote than Paxton does?
That's the idea.
Well, no, the idea being that wishful thinking that it's Cornyn versus Rhino side.
Yeah.
I would say it's Cornyn versus Field.
We're going to put up this.
This will be 2.3.
We got a pit.
We have a we'll have a little some polling here.
And then, of course, we have an interesting Democratic primary.
You have Crockett and what's that guy's name, Tellarico, who created quite a stir, right?
That's right.
On the Democrat side, Tellerico versus.
Now, the last poll I saw, Crockett is winning by about four or five points.
Yes, Tellerico's made some big waves, though, with that by lying to his own voters.
So the idea being that some in the Democrat Party powers that be think so they like him.
He's a good liar.
I said that's a Republican primary poll right there.
That's one poll.
Again, this is one of many.
So take it with a grain of salt, but it does show payments.
I know, I think that's pretty much the consensus, isn't it, Ted?
That Paxton is ahead.
Cornyn is second.
The other guy is third.
The Cornyn people feel good that most of that Hunt vote that contracts will go to Cornyn and not to Paxton.
I don't know why.
Is Hunt not a conservative?
I mean, Paxton is the more conservative of the two candidates.
And the president is not making an endorsement.
And I people say that if he made an endorsement, he would endorse Cornyn.
I'm not sure of that.
Certainly Paxton has been more loyal to him.
I don't know enough about Hunt.
But yes, I think the folks are saying you want my choice.
If I were in Texas, I would vote for Paxton.
Right.
He's got a five-point lead.
But yeah, you wonder if that vote for Hunt Cornyn's well known.
Paxton's pretty good.
I like John Cornyn, but if I'm having a pick between him and a guy that gave blood for us, I'd go with Paxton.
Yeah.
And I think he'd give blood for us in the Senate.
I'm not sure John would give blood for us.
He had a chance to, and he didn't.
Right.
Good guy, nice guy.
I like him a lot.
Well, Mayor.
But if I'm making, I also like Paxton a lot as well.
And he helped me a lot in trying to ward off one of the worst frauds in American history.
So he should be the candidate.
Well, we've got a great guest.
We've had him on before to fill us in.
He's running himself.
Of course, we're going to ask him about the big Senate primaries.
Commander Jay Furman, candidate for Congress.
And you can look at look at the guy.
I mean, this talk about, I mean, you think Texas, right?
I think Commander Jay Furman, we've had him on before.
Of course, he was involved with the terrible flooding.
We had him on.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
He was helping.
And he sure does.
He sure doesn't look like he comes from New York or Minneapolis.
Thank God.
Commander, welcome back to the show.
Good to see everybody.
And I'm glad to see you all out there following Texas happening to the president here.
And we're on the map everywhere.
We've got big races going.
Thanks for checking in, Mayor.
That's going to be a, however, it comes out, Paxton or Cornyn.
Is it you think it's going to be Crockett on the other side?
Oh, God.
We all hope so.
I hope.
I mean, actually, first of all, make it more fun.
The other guy's no fun.
Who knows what you could do?
He's trying to reinvent the Bible, you know, and I don't know.
He's bullish, too.
You really can't make this stuff up, Mayor.
I mean, you know, it's really, it's really the theater of the macabre with the Democrats.
You know, they've dog whistled their electorate so well that they just know how to say the most ridiculous things.
It doesn't make sense because they don't have a philosophy or a principled platform.
So that's what they do.
And, you know, they might as well be dressed up like the Kiss Band, you know, saying things in front of folks because that makes about as much sense.
So now tell me about your race.
Well, we're Texas CD35 mayor.
As you know, we're one of the new redistricted districts, one of the Trump districts, I like to say, one of the big, beautiful maps.
We're going to send them up reinforcements.
And I'm just here to make sure he gets the right Trump Republican in there.
I'm running against a couple of rhinos that are trying to hold poll position and fake the electorate a little bit.
So I've been around, ran against Henry Quayer, almost beat that 22-year Democrat crook.
And then I got redistricted.
So here it's this new district.
It's basically Southeast San Antonio and then three counties to the east and south.
And we're so it turned into from a Democrat 20-point advantage to a Republican seven-point advantage.
And boy, we're excited.
We're definitely going to send up strong reinforcements.
I'm in the lead, leading right now, but I'm trying to defend against some people that really are more want to pull us back to where we were in the Biden years.
I've got a brother of, yeah, go ahead.
Does this end up being one where you have to get 50% or does the leading voter win the?
Oh, yeah.
So there's, you know, there's three leading cans right now, but there's a football team on the ballot, literally 11 people.
So it's 11 folks that are trying to get that 50%.
It's not going to happen.
So it's going to be a runoff.
And yes, sir, 50% plus one vote avoids the runoff.
So we're nowhere close to that, but we're happy to be leading in the pack here and trying to defend this ground for the president for South Texans.
We can finally get some representation that matches.
So now, how do you see the Senate race, or do you try to stay out of it?
Oh, no.
I mean, I'm a big fan of Kim Paxton.
I think you said it earlier.
He's got blood on him all over him for defending the president, defending Texans and our way of life.
And he doesn't hold back.
So we need those kind of fighters right now, just the kind of fighter you are.
We need some real folks that are going to take care of business in D.C. like the president takes care of business.
So all in for Kim Paxton.
He needs to go get it done.
And Texans know, you know, all of these fake polls really aren't telling the story of how Texans feel.
They know who's got their back.
So Ken's going to do it there.
And then we've got other hot races.
So, you know, it's really busy around here.
Tough to raise money with all these big, you know, heavyweight boxers in the ring, but we're doing it here.
We may be one vote majority in the House.
Fox News just said the other day, we may have a one House member majority.
And so Texas 35 is consequential for the entire nation that we get the right one in there, not somebody that's going to put us back in the dark ages again, letting in the stormtroopers.
So I keep hearing this, and I hope you can straighten it out.
But people tell me that Texas may go Islamic.
Like London Stand, right?
Well, I tell you, They have targeted Texas because they, as citizens feel increasingly, are the we're the they have targeted us because they know that we're the big domino to the United States.
If you knock down Texas politically, if you weaken it, then you weaken the entire United States.
So, and that's true politically across the board, you know, as we've had a lot of resettlement from Californians and others.
Um, you know, we're trying to hold ground here by our metropolitan areas.
You know, you just mentioned one of the candidates that is you know, Crockett, who's popular only because of these uh Democrat uh hell holes as far as politically, they're wonderful places, but politically they're they're just that.
Um, yeah, so that's that's a problem.
We have Epic City north of Dallas, um, who you know is building an Islamic exclusive community.
He's actually been there a long time, they're building it out now.
There's one near Houston.
Um, yeah, so it's um, it's interesting.
We um, we are definitely on the on the blotter for really what's called total warfare, and the Islamic nation is no right.
Yeah, how about that?
You know, it looks like the border looks like attacking our dog, looks like attacking our culture.
Well, the Muslims that want to change us, um, you know, want to infiltrate and multiply and then dominate.
And that's really what they've been doing for 1400 years.
The folks now, there are plenty of Muslims who are good Americans who assimilate and really adopt our culture as far as laws and the way they govern outside of their home.
Uh, and then so long as they don't violate our laws inside their home, we're okay with that in America.
We're not okay with them uh trying to make elect one of the 54 nations that are Muslim, which we don't go try to change.
Uh, and really we should keep it that way, you know, everywhere everywhere that that it's it's it's crazy, yeah, yes, sir.
They want us to change, uh, we want them just to be like the other Americans that came here.
We have a great, great history of immigration, but the reason it worked is assimilation, right?
Immigration without assimilation means you give your country away that people should be coming here because it's the greatest country on earth, and they want to help us make it greater, and we're happy to take the help and they can make little changes and improvements, but we don't need fundamental changes.
And the reason they came here is because we don't need fundamental changes, that's why they're all coming here.
So it makes this a very, very important battle, very important cultural battle for the whole country and for the world.
I mean, Europe, Western Europe, seems to be losing.
It has.
I was stationed there between 2013 and 2016, and really that's when Angela Merkel, the chancellor of Germany, invited one million northern Iraqis and Syrians into that country.
I couldn't send my family in the train towards the last year that we were there.
It was so bad.
They could not assimilate.
And it was really a harbinger of what's here to come if we don't get a handle on this.
Really, you know, you can't take large, large numbers.
You have to vet them extremely.
And really, you have to make sure that they don't use their meeting places and try to carve out whole communities that can be used to plot against us.
That's what happens in madrasas and mosques and many other places in the world.
Those are always central meeting places.
And really, in big, big cities, we learned in the military that those were the raccoonization areas because that's where people are without family very often.
And they're looking for a buoy.
And that imam is placed there strategically by people like CARE and the Muslim Brotherhood and what have you, which are fully infiltrating our country politically.
So we have to really be wary of this.
And they've been here for some decades.
We can't just assume that they just want to get along To be one of us, because that's really not the mandate of any Muslim Brotherhood connected or any care connected organization.
It's like the Sinn Feng and the IRA.
And there's one soft or illegal arm, and then there's one, no kidding, hardcore jihadi arm.
It's very similar.
We need to pay attention to that.
And that was a Christian culture crossover.
This is a complete divide.
So if we're looking at Iran as an example, they have the exact same mentality.
They're really kind of a metastasized version of this.
And they export terrorism everywhere because they, for their version of Islam, have to cause chaos to execute their end times prophecy.
So, you know, we don't want to be a part of that.
Hey, we're a Christian nation.
It works really well.
Like you said, that's why they come.
So in Texas, we defend our freedoms, we defend our people, and we defend those values.
And again, that's why we're doing so well.
Eighth-largest economy in the world, and we can't let that go, defend our families who are in that workforce.
And we're going to do that from 35.
We are the Alamo mayor.
We are going to hold the line for here, South Texas.
We are going to hold the line for the nation.
And if we're that working with you, I will absolutely be the one that backs President Trump 100,000% and leadership backing him.
Defending Texas Values00:02:47
And we just want to make sure we don't have the wrong guys in there.
We've got some nepotism going on here.
We've got some liberal representative in the state of Texas and the state legislature that's running here.
People just don't know that story.
And it's not on brand for President Trump either cases.
When you're working on the Dignity Act in the first case to give asylum to any illegal that has a job, we don't need any more of that.
That was really part of the problem.
Like you said, we need to restart our beautiful story of immigration, but the folks that came in under the Biden era, we don't know who they are.
Very, very, very self-identified.
Yeah, they're hard to tell us which one the bad ones are.
I've been involved in immigration since the 70s, Ford administration, Reagan administration, Justice Department.
This group is a very, very different group.
You know, when they say most of the immigrants don't commit as much crime as Americans, used to be true.
Not true at all with this group.
And second, if you need any help, I was infiltrating Moss back in the 1990s.
From the time they bombed the World Trade Center the first time, planned in a mosque in New Jersey.
We placed undercover agents there.
It took them 12 years to catch us.
Oh, and then we were all, it was just awful that we did it.
But Chris Christian was the governor of New Jersey and he complained because he thought Mike Bloomberg did it.
And I called him up and I said, Chris, shut up.
I did it.
He said, couldn't you trust the New Jersey?
He said, couldn't you trust the New Jersey police?
I said, I don't trust anything from my own police.
Sorry.
But thank you very much.
It's great that we have you.
You know, you're in the right place at the right time, Jay, given the experience you have.
Just your knowledge, your knowledge of it is quite impressive.
And Texas is going to need that, and we need it.
God bless.
Thank you, sir.
He really, that really, it really is true.
I mean, you think about it, there's a man who served seeing what can happen with extremist Muslim ideology.
And it's very much affecting Texas.
I was going to hope he would say to me it was exaggerated.
I know it's not, but people kind of come to me with all these stories, I guess, because of 9-11 and because of my own experience with fatwas and stuff like that.
But people tend to come to me and bring me these things.
Like I can, I can, I had to see these two English people.
I was traveling on a plane about last two weeks ago or whatever.
Dr. Marie and I were waiting and the English guy came over to me.
Use Promo Code Lindel00:04:19
He's almost crying in my lap that the London's going to go.
He said it's much worse than you think.
And it is worse than I thought because he actually educated me.
I thought that a lot of the problem was in the smaller cities of England, particularly going up the coast, the West Coast.
And because I had read about how there had been real problems with Sharia Law and whatever.
He tells me the problem is in London.
Which we're going to do a thing on that.
I think I have the right person for it.
We're going to take a break and we'll be right back.
If you want to drop extra pounds, boost energy levels and reduce swelling in your legs and feet, then this message is for you.
Pure Health Research is on a mission to make America healthy again.
And two of their best-selling health supplements are leading the way.
First is Liver Health Formula.
Over 100 million Americans have a sluggish liver that's riddled with fatty deposits.
This can kill your metabolism, pile on the pounds, and make you feel tired.
Liver Health Formula takes care of that.
It supports thriving liver health with special nutrients like artichoke extract and milk thistle.
This is one of the easiest ways to slim down and revitalize your energy levels.
Next is lymph system support.
If you struggle with fluid buildup or swelling in your legs, ankles, and feet, this is for you.
The natural ingredients in lymph system support help gently flush away extra fluid and toxins out of your body.
And right now, for a limited time, you can get 35% off liver health formula and lymph system support, along with 50 plus other health supplements that Pure Health Research has to offer.
So head over to PureHealthResearch.com and use promo code Lindel at checkout.
That's purehealthresearch.com.
Chromo code Lindel to save 35% on your order today.
For the first time ever, we're bringing you MyPillow Mattresses and Mattress Toppers for as low as $99.98.
Remember, sleep's all about temperature and pressure points.
Whatever sleep needs you have, we have the right technology for you.
Like our MyPillow mattress topper, our queen size has over 10,000 individual comfort supports to help relieve your pressure points.
And how about our three-inch hybrid plus mattress topper?
It's infused with copper and silver to help your body get the restorative sleep it needs.
And our MyPillow and Case Coil mattresses, I personally helped develop these mattresses to make sure they have everything needed to give us great sleep.
Plus, they're made right here in the USA and they ship right to your front door absolutely free.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use this promo code to get my pillow mattresses and toppers for as low as $99.98 and free shipping.
Let's face it, you can't trust Big Pharma.
They've already tried to block ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and raise prices on everything from antibiotics to your daily meds.
Well, there's good news.
All Family Pharmacy is standing up for medical freedom and helping people get the treatments they actually want.
My family and I use them all the time.
They made it easy and affordable without the runaround.
While other pharmacies are jacking up prices, they've actually dropped theirs.
Ivermectin now starts at just $2 a capsule.
Use my promo code Lindale10 to get an extra 10% off of that.
You need ivermectin antibiotics or methylene glue, you name it, they've got it.
They make it simple.
You fill in a short online form, a licensed doctor reviews it, your medship pass right to your front door.
If you want to be prepared and have your medications on hand, this is your new pharmacy.
Welcome to Vocal, the free speech social app that gives you a platform to amplify your voice, speak freely, connect boldly, and be part of a growing movement for truth, faith, and freedom.
Visit AllFamilyPharmacy.com00:10:35
Want to know what's happening right now?
The now playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed, a non-stop lineup, including Lindell TV News 24-7, shows and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on Vocal, you can join the live chat and be part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's Cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level.
From faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
Welcome back to the Rudy Giuliani Show on Lindell TV.
And that behind me is the largest naval and most measles naval vessel in the world.
And it is pointed at Iran.
I would not like to be in Iran.
And I wouldn't like to have been in Iran for any of the last 47 years.
And this, to me, whatever happens if they take him out is 47 years late.
It should have been done when he, well, maybe 46 years, it should have been done when he took the hostages.
And we got the hostages back within a short period of time.
There should have been no more Ayatollah.
You don't get to take American hostages and get away with it.
Maybe it would have saved a lot of lives if we did that.
The Epstein case, which it's very hard to analyze this because as a lawyer, prosecutor, defense lawyer, whatever, the underlying crimes that we know took place, we don't know how many or how extensive, but we know they took place.
And particularly the ones involving children are horrific.
These are some of the worst crimes.
I mean, it's almost non-human when you're talking about, you know, defiling children.
However, there's a tremendous number of these people that did business with this man for other reasons.
So there's an article today about how the Chase Bank threw him out after he got convicted, I guess the first time, you know, when he got convicted and he got the light sentence or sentence that was 13 months, but he was half his time coming home.
However, all the bankers stayed involved with him in various investments and investment advice.
And now, there's no suggestion in the article.
The article is pretty straight.
But a lot of people read that and say, well, maybe those bankers stayed involved with him because of the extracurricular activities that the guy provided.
Well, we don't know that.
I mean, he was a financial advisor.
There were people who rightly or wrongly relied on him for financial advice and solely had a relationship with him on that basis.
There also are a lot of people, Democrats, who went to him for money.
He was one of their biggest fundraisers and donors.
So you tell me how we distinguish between how we distinguish between the two.
Now, Hillary Clinton gave one example, which was if you went to the island, you might be in a more suspicious category.
Can I ask, why was Colleen Maxwell Chelsea Clinton's wedding in 2010?
She'd already been mentioned in a civil lawsuit by Virginia Juprey before that.
Jeffrey actually already been convicted before that.
She came as the plus one, the guest of someone who was invited.
Thank you all.
Tell us who she is.
Maxwell.
Yeah.
No, I know.
Remember, she was very, very definitive that she never met, that she never met Epstein.
And that she knew and that she knew, oh, there you see, you actually see her in the picture.
She's right there.
She got an aisle seat at the wedding.
She got an aisle seat.
Well, I mean, it's just hard to, it's just you're reading too many tea leaves for my taste, you know, from having been a prosecutor and a lawyer.
I just don't like this.
Billy, Billy, Billy Boy, has an awful lot of connections with him, and they are enormously analyzing, suspicious, whatever you want to call them, but still no proof that I can see, unless they're hiding it somewhere.
Unlike President Trump, he doesn't have any exonerating evidence.
Remember, Trump has exonerating evidence from Jaffree and from Maxwell, both.
So Maxwell, you put aside.
Maxwell's a criminal.
She could be lying.
Jeffrey, I don't know how you can put her aside.
She's the main witness, the main that pretty much not be a case without her.
And she says definitively, Trump had nothing to do with this.
So I don't know how you chase Trump when that's going on.
The most you could say is some of his recollection might have been wrong about it.
Yeah.
So what?
Your recollection is going to be wrong about stuff like that all the time.
Right.
So I don't know if they have hard evidence, is what I'm saying.
I don't know.
I haven't seen it.
Haven't heard it.
Something very bad happened.
Who actually did it?
Who was involved in it?
Can they be prosecuted?
And now immediately people are going to jump to, well, if that can't happen, people are covering things up.
Could be.
But I haven't seen that.
And I have seen plenty of situations where there's a lot of smoke.
There's even fire.
But you just can't put it together.
And if they did put it together in many of these cases, it might turn out to be barred by the statute of limitations, or it might turn out to be marginal, meaning girls who were being used for prostitution but were of age.
So I'll tell you one of the things that people should be really concerned about.
And that is the case that's come out about Susie Wiles, which is disgraceful.
Susie Wiles was a telephone conversation with her lawyer with tape record by the FBI.
That is, unless there's probable cause and a heck of an affidavit, that's illegal and unethical and unconstitutional and un-American.
The FBI said that the lawyer consented to it.
Hard to believe.
Hard to believe.
Hard to believe that any lawyer would consent to a recording of his client.
And the lawyer consenting, I don't know what that means.
A lawyer can't consent to a recording for you.
That's absurd.
But at any event, he says he didn't.
She says she believes him.
I believe him.
Unless the guy doesn't care for his law license, what the hell would he ever agree to a tape recording of his client?
Which doesn't make sense.
And why?
And if the FBI wanted to get consent, why don't they ask her?
This has got to be run down.
Now, I'm going to tell you, I have a strong interest in this because they searched my law office, the FBI did, and they won't give me the damn affidavit.
Even the present FBI, the Trump, my good friend Cash, and my good friend Pam Bondi.
And I've been trying to get the affidavit for three years.
Why am I getting, I want the affidavit?
They searched my house.
They searched my law office.
They had an affidavit from a federal judge or magistrate, but I never got to see it.
And they have to have probable cause that I committed a crime.
A year and a half later, after a full and complete investigation, they write a letter to the grand jury saying there's no probable cause that Juliana committed a crime.
And they even use those words.
But what happened with the probable cause?
I want to see the affidavit.
You better have a lot of probable cause to search a lawyer's office.
You ruined my law practice.
You invaded the privacy of a lot of clients that have absolutely nothing to do with this.
It's a disgraceful thing that you did.
And just another example of the unbelievable black period in American law, the worst under Biden and that poor excuse for an attorney general that we had.
Well, thank you very much for joining us tonight and this week.
Stay tuned.
Go over to X. We'll continue and keep alert all weekend.