LindellTV is now publicly traded! OTC market … Stock symbol: $MLMCShow more Join Rudy Giuliani, famously known as "America's Mayor," for a hard-hitting daily show that rips the veil off Washington, D.C. corruption. With his unparalleled experience and insider knowledge, Giuliani delivers razor-sharp insights into the political dynamics driving the nation’s capital, exposing hidden agendas and breaking down the day’s top news. Fearless commentary, explosive revelations, and a no-holds-barred look at the forces shaping America’s future, straight from one of the country’s most trusted voices.
Stop blindly investing, and start collecting oil royalty checks instead, visit https://LindellOilBoom.com
DITCH Covidian Doctors ! From Ivermectin, HCQ, to weight loss & Blood Pressure Medicine..https://AllFamilyPharmacy.com/Lindell has you covered. Their Licensed Doctors are on call and can even write you up to a YEAR’s Worth of Prescriptions! Use code LINDELL10 for 10% OFF your entire order.
These air purifiers are the best invention since the Pillow! Sanitize the air you breathe: Https://airwaterhealing.com and USE Promo code LINDELL to receive a FREE air purifier with Cardio Miracle subscription.
Protect and grow your wealth with the America First Retirement plan! Visit https://AmericaFirstRetirementPlan.com or CALL Carlos Cortez directly at 833-813-3446
Go to https://PureHealthResearch.com now, and explore their 45 amazing supplements, and save 35% before this deal ends with coupon code LINDELL
Go to https://Mypillow.com and use the promo code L77 to save up to 66% off My Pillow products and support the Lindell TV Network.
Neil Armstrong’s SHOCKING Apollo 11 confession: He reported a strange encounter he had in space during a post-mission debrief. NASA did their best to keep it secret. But now, unearthed NASA audio is blowing the lid off of everything. Watch Now:https://pro.greatcures.com/m/2473354 Show less
This is Rudy Giuliani, and this is the Rudy Giuliani show, and we're on Mike Lindell TV.
I saw Mike this weekend, went to a fundraiser for him at the Trump Mar-lago.
It was a terrific fundraiser.
The place was packed.
Overwhelming support.
I mean, I have to say, it's very early in his campaign to have this level of support and enthusiasm.
So good luck.
Boy.
The only thing I said of any note there was: many people think Mike is crazy because he wants to be governor of Minnesota.
Who the hell would want to be governor of Minnesota?
Then I thought, I ran for mayor of New York.
You know, when I did, every one of my friends but one told me I was crazy.
They say, you're going to ruin, you're going to ruin your, you're going to ruin your career, your life.
Nobody's ever been successful since LaGuardia.
They all get ruined.
Nobody can solve.
They promise to solve things.
They don't solve anything.
It just gets worse.
And then it turned out to work.
The reform worked.
And now we have a disaster.
Worse than I thought.
Worse than I thought.
We'll get to that shortly about the people dying on the streets.
I mean, this is absurd.
This is America.
People are dying on the streets of cold.
The policy of taking people off the streets when it gets to be freezing or near freezing went back to way before me as mayor.
As I said, some of the dumbest Democrat mayors get it.
But this is not a Democrat.
This is a communist and a big supporter of Islamic extremism who took his oath of office on the Koran.
To be fair to your friends, you are the exception, not the rule.
I mean, if you think about some of the people who sense you, did Bloomberg was he loved or disliked more by the time he ended being mayor?
First eight years was very, very popular.
And Bloomberg overall did a very good job.
His last four years were tarnished by the fact that people felt that he double-crossed him by running for third term and changing by a little bit of trickery with the city council the resolution for two for two terms.
I could go and explain to you what the what the trick was, but it hurt him a lot.
He only won that election by four or five points, having spent $100 million.
But that leads to my point.
Was Michael Bloomberg more popular in 2002 or in 2014?
He was more popular when he came into than when he left, but he was very popular in office.
He won re-election the first time that he ran by approximately the same percentage I did.
He won by a landslide.
And he did it.
And he did a very good job the first term and the second term.
The third term, he had a lot of problems.
Yeah.
But a lot of it was caused by this.
I think if a better candidate had run against him, they'd have beat him for the third term because people were really angry that he reversed their twice voted for resolution that you should only have two terms.
Was de Blasio more popular going into office or coming out?
He was unpopular throughout.
I think he was down to 1% when he left.
He was in, well, so was Adam.
Poor Adams wasn't left in April.
Most of them left.
But so that's the go to the point where that shows how I left at 90%, but that was September 11th.
But the point being, you bucked the trend.
And I just, that's to point out to your friends who said, who told you if you run, you're only going to ruin your career.
You didn't.
No, no, no.
However, almost every other person in that position.
It was just the opposite.
But you are the exception, not the rule.
That's the point.
It breaks my heart to see what's going on in my city now.
This is indescribable, undescribed, indescribable that you'd stand by and 19 people have now died on the street, and he's still sticking to, you know, I'm not going to force them off the street.
Why does he think they're on the street in the first place?
Because there's something wrong, right?
And what is it, 40%, 50% of paranoid schizophrenics?
I mean, my heart used to go out to the people homeless.
I wrote an op-ed piece that's been quoted a lot.
I wrote it during de Blasio's term.
And I said, if you see a lot of homeless people on the street of a city, you know there's a mayor who doesn't like people, doesn't care about people.
The picking up of the homeless off the street, to me, wasn't part of the law enforcement.
Or enforcement, my law enforcement strategies were different.
This was about just plain humanity.
I couldn't stand seeing people in my city living on the street for them, for their own good.
It's just going to come to bad doing that.
And I used to always analogize whenever I analyzed a social program.
What would you do if it was your brother?
I used to use this with my staff when we would analyze it.
I'd say, just play pretend with me for a minute, maybe because I was a lawyer and loved hypotheticals, but I'd say, to illustrate logic, I would say, suppose your mother called you, you had a younger brother, and your mother said to you, your brother Jack is on the streets.
Things have really gone bad in his life.
I know he separated from us and now he's on the streets.
I want you to help him.
And it was about 30 degrees out, right?
What would you do?
Would you go and say, Jack, here's some food, here's some money, stay on the streets.
You have a right to be there.
Would you say, Jack, it's your decision, I'd like to take you home with me or take you to a place for evaluation or find out, is it alcohol, is there a paranoid schizophrenia?
It surely isn't just not having a place to live.
There are plenty of places to live in New York.
You don't have a place to live.
And if he said no, what would you do?
I know what I would do.
I'd pick him up, put him in my car, and I'd take him where he had to go because I love him.
Not because I want to be a dictator, because I love him.
I wouldn't say, oh, he should make his own decision.
Stay there, freeze to death.
Need Help In Kidnapping?00:14:42
Well, I don't know.
Every mayor I can think of made the decision that I made, which is you take them off the streets if it's freezing.
Liberal mayors, Democratic mayors, I was the only Republican mayor, good mayors, bad mayors.
Nobody was as mean as this man.
But it comes out of his ideology.
Don't you realize that?
I mean, he's a communist.
Communists don't regard human life as important.
Marx tells them that.
And he comes out of being an Islamic extremist.
They don't regard human life as very important either.
We'll get into some of that later.
The video from Savannah Guthrie just a short while ago was somewhat jarring, right?
And I guess the deadline is now passed, Ted.
We're at five o'clock.
We're at a few minutes past.
We're at about a few minutes past five in Arizona.
And if I recall, not that we've seen the letter, but it's been described.
I tried to get a KGUN9 was one of the three who received the letter.
Remember, the Guthries did not get the letter or the whatever it is, the note.
I think the note is actually some kind of an email, right?
Ted, it's not like a written note.
Like we, I mean, I remember doing kidnapping cases where we used to, and they would take the F out of FBI and they'd take another letter and they pieced it together so there'd be no handwriting.
But here's a quote from KGUN9, which was one of the three media outlets to receive the note over the weekend, right?
Multiple ransom notes have been sent out to the media, including one that was sent to us, said J.J. McKinney, who's KGUN9 was one of the three to get it.
In the letter, the potential kidnappers demanded that the Guthries pay them $6 million before 5 p.m. on Monday.
First time, that was the first time on Saturday that a number was revealed.
And they put two deadlines in.
This is a little confusing because one deadline had passed already.
One deadline was they could pay $4 million if they did it by local time on Thursday.
So they're telling us this on Saturday.
Then if they waited until Monday at 5, they'd have to pay $6 million in Bitcoin.
And they gave him the instructions on how to do it in Bitcoin.
No one has verified that this is real.
No one has given proof that Nancy Guthrie is still alive, God willing she is, but no one's given proof of that.
And so let's look at how Savannah responded to this immediately.
This was on Saturday, right, Ted?
That she put this out.
And this seemed pretty definitive.
Hi there, everybody.
I wanted to come on and just share a few thoughts as we enter into another week of this nightmare.
I just want to say, first of all, thank you so much for all of the prayers and the love that we have felt, my sister and brother and I.
And that our mom has felt.
Because we believe that somehow, some way, she is feeling these prayers and that God is lifting her even in this moment and in this darkest place.
We believe our mom is still out there.
We need your help.
Law enforcement is working tirelessly around the clock trying to bring her home, trying to find her.
She was taken and we don't know where.
And we need your help.
So I'm coming on just to ask you, not just for your prayers, but no matter where you are, even if you're far from Tucson, if you see anything, if you hear anything, if there's anything at all that seems strange to you, that you report to law enforcement.
We are in an hour of desperation.
and we need your help.
That of course is sort of a little bit of a reverse order, but that was the one she put out a couple hours ago.
Strangely, so let's comment on that.
Strangely, she doesn't say anything about what she had said on Saturday, which is that they are, they want to give, they want to pay the ransom because they want their mother back under all circumstances.
So she doesn't reiterate that.
She doesn't say she's not.
She doesn't say she will.
As far as I know, the ransom wasn't paid.
And this surprised me, but I'm not an expert on Bitcoin, that you can publicly find out if a Bitcoin transaction took place and no transaction took place in that account.
Now, could they have done a switch on us?
Of course.
Would it be smart to do that?
Yeah, it would be.
But in any event, as far as we know, they did not pay.
The last statement sounded like they're not going to pay.
And under normal circumstances, they wouldn't.
Saturday was a bit strange, as several FBI retired experts said.
I don't think the current FBI commented on this, although I'm sure they gave her their advice privately, which was never pay unless there's proof that the person is alive.
I mean, the FBI, in kidnappings, there are no, it's not like a law, it's a fixed rule, but there are protocols that have worked out over a period of time with percentages and all kinds of things.
And if they're not, if for $6 million, they're not willing to give you proof that the person is alive, which is pretty simple, it would be pretty simple to do, then you have to assume that they're not or that you'll push them back and they will start negotiating with you.
It is very difficult, though.
I mean, think of it yourself, right?
So now let's listen to what she said on Saturday.
And I don't know.
Let's see if we can make some kind of sense out of what the switch in position was.
The part in the last statement that I don't quite get is the whole thing about we need your help and all over America.
I don't know if that's to throw the kidnappers off or there are no kidnappers or they're not sure.
But it sounds like you're desperate, which they are.
But it also sounds like you're starting from square one.
I mean, that theoretically, mom could be any place in America.
And you need people to look for something suspicious.
I do.
I mean, I remember a very famous kidnapping in New York where someone did see something suspicious and reported it.
In fact, one of the kidnappers, actually, now that I think about it, one of the kidnappers got nervous and one reported it to police so he could save himself.
But in any event, there are no rules to this.
And from that last statement, it sounds like they're in a pretty desperate position in the sense of not really having a very good fix on where mom is, whether she's alive.
Now, just to confuse you more, that could all be done as a way to throw the kidnappers or the potential murderers off.
So again, we're not going to know until it's solved.
Now, we shouldn't.
I have no problem with that.
I'm not sure really how you define the public's right to know in a situation like this.
The public's right to know or right to be involved is only as important as their ability to help solve the crime.
The most important thing is to keep her alive.
And if that means keeping all the information confidential, then keep it confidential.
If it means putting some of it out, but not all, then put some of it out, but not all.
If it means engaging in a subterfuge, then do it.
So let's listen to the plea on Saturday, which seemed to be heading toward a payment of money before 5 p.m. or Eastern time, 7 p.m., which we're in.
We received your message and we understand.
We beg you now to return our mother to us so that we can celebrate with her.
This is the only way we will have peace.
This is very valuable to us, and we will pay.
As you can get, it was beautifully done.
And I don't mean in any disrespectful sense, but the way they all held hands and they showed the potential kidnappers, they're all together on this.
They're all in agreement on this.
Or they were attempting to do that.
And they were attempting to convey sincerity that they were going to pay the money.
Now, it could be over the weekend, a couple of things, some of the facts may have emerged that changed the situation.
It may be that the FBI prevailed on them that it would be a mistake and you'd really lose control of it if you paid the money with the lack of proof that exists right now.
That you would just lose any control over this.
Now we'll have to see what happens.
If you just take this statement, the last one, at face value, it sounds like they are, there's not a particularly strong or good theory as to what happened.
If you also realize that tactically they could be trying to create that impression because they're zeroing in on somebody and don't want to alert them.
That's also possible.
So I don't know if there's much further that we can do about it.
If it is true and they do need your help, please try to be alert.
Do that.
I mean, I have no idea if that, again, if that's a if that's a ruse or a legitimate request, but you might as well treat it as legitimate, right?
I would think so.
God bless them.
I mean, this is a terrible situation.
Let me also emphasize there is no right answer.
The right answer is the one that works and you only find out after.
Now, that's not to suggest that the sheriff handle, I mean, the sheriff will have to go to his grave knowing that he screwed up the first couple hours of this investigation.
And those are the most crucial.
You can never get those back.
In a kidnapping, in many crimes, it's the first couple hours that are the most critical.
It's whoever arrives there first is going to get the best sense of what happened and how it happened.
And then if you screw up the crime scene, if you screw up the crime scene, you don't know what you deprived yourself of, right?
If you wiped out a fingerprint or stepped over a shoe impression that could be garnered.
I mean, crimes are sometimes solved on the smallest little mistake.
And calling in the FBI late, what a terrible, terrible mistake.
Here you have a local police department, no aspersion on them, but they're not experts in handling kidnapping.
I don't know when the last kidnapping there was.
And you have the biggest experts in America on kidnapping standing by.
You bring them in right away.
Look, the New York City Police Department is bigger than the FBI.
It has at least equal forensic resources, if not more.
It's two or three times the size.
And its experience level is, unfortunately, phenomenal because of all the different varied crimes in New York.
However, the FBI be called it on second one of a kidnapping.
As the mayor, as the head of the police department, I would never have thought of ever handling a kidnapping just with the NYPD.
And if the NYPD needs the FBI to do it, believe me, everybody does.
Ethnic Plurality and Protest00:15:32
Well, in any event, and let's pray.
I believe completely in the power of prayer.
And I don't think that's an idle statement.
Let's pray.
I think Savannah asked us to do it.
And God, Savannah, we're all with you tonight, all of us.
Whole world.
We're behind you.
Let's hope you get mom back.
You look like you had a wonderful relationship with your mom.
And she was a big, big help to you.
I might just cry.
I don't know.
Well, Over the weekend, Ted and I had the, really had the honor of covering the rally in Berlin that was done by the Iranian, the true, real Iranian dissidents, not the make-believe Shah.
And they were at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin, the place where the wall was, right?
And they had a series of speeches by Madam Maryam Rajavi, who is the president of the NCRI and MEK and the coalition that exists to temporarily run the government of Iran and move it within six months to an election with a 10-point plan to formulate a constitution.
Thank you.
And during the course of the rally, which was about two hours, right?
Ted?
It was about two-hour rally and then a march.
And the temperatures were like in New York.
They were at below freezing.
And it didn't seem to affect the enthusiasm of the crowd.
Also, I think you would realize, if you saw this, that it is not unrealistic to think that the protesters in Iran could overthrow the regime, just by the sheer volume of them and the geographic dispersion and the ethnic plurality.
Unlike the phony Shah, who is despised by the ethnic minorities in Iran, who make up about 42 to 48% of the population, the NCRI consists of them as well as the Persian-oriented or Persian-derived Iranians.
And Mrs. Rajavi during her talk made reference to the Kurds and the Aziris and the Balushis and the Turkmen and the Arabs.
There are about 18 of them.
The three biggest, I guess, are the biggest are the Azeri, which kind of derive from Azerbaijan and Turkey, obviously, as well as the Turkmen.
The second biggest would be the Kurds, who have large representations in Iraq.
You can remember that from the Iraq war.
They were very, very loyal and helpful to us.
And they have a big group in Turkey, at least those three places that kind of abut each other geographically.
And they also happen to be sitting on land that has a vast amount of natural resources.
So it's a substantial group.
That group, even more than the ethnic Persians, the original Iranians, were tortured by the Shah.
They were a particular focus of his persecutions.
And the prison that he built, which is the prison that is being used now by the Ayatollah and the SAVAC, his secret police.
There is an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal today by some professor talking about his mother was imprisoned by the Shah, but that doesn't stop him from supporting the son of the Shah.
Here's what should stop him.
The son of the Shah has never had a job.
This is a big job.
The son of the Shah has never really earned a living.
He lived off the stolen money that his mother, father, and associates took from the billions of millions, hundreds of millions or billions, I don't know, that they took from the Iranian people.
He's never made any attempt to seek any kind of return of that.
Until recently, he hasn't made any attempt to help the Iranian people.
He even offered to come and fight for them against Iraq so he could keep the Ayatollah in power.
He has voluntarily said that he's spoken to first 50,000 and then 100,000 members of the IRGC who would help him.
Now, the IRGC is the SAVAC of the Ayatollah.
They're the secret police.
They're the Gestapo.
They got the blood of so many Americans on their hands.
It's unseemly to be having conversations with them.
But there's another reason you shouldn't be having conversations with them.
They're an American-designated terrorist group, now an EU-designated terrorist group.
50,000 to 100,000 conversations with a terrorist group to try to work with them would constitute a crime in the United States if he did it from the United States.
It also would make you wonder what the hell kind of regime he's thinking of putting together.
Are they going to be his SAVAC?
And finally, he's got no plan.
There's no plan.
I mean, he said the plan changes.
At one time, he has been named the heir apparent.
He has been named the prince.
He's been crowned.
He says now he's sort of backing away from a monarchy now, but there's no plan.
If you were to do it, here's just one publication.
This is a small one.
This is a publication from 2022 concerning what should be done with Iran, what the plans are, the 10-point program, which is spelled out in hundreds and hundreds of pages of text.
And I'm just turning to this right here.
It says, the alternative should be capable of immediately implementing the plan after the overthrow of the regime and the establishment of the new government.
In other words, specific programs and plans to be implemented while the new government organizes the holding of elections for the establishment of the Constituent Assembly and drafting the Constitution of the New Republic must be pre-announced and begin immediately.
Postponing the announcement of such a platform to alter the transfer of power would set the stage for betraying the pronounced ideas of the revolution, something that happened when Khomeini seized power.
Prior to the 1979 revolution, which threw the Shah out because he was a crooked, homicidal dictator, whenever Khomeini was asked about his plans regarding various issues, he would slyly say that he will announce such plans after the revolution's victory.
Well, he did have a plan.
It was called maniacal dictatorship.
Then they talk about pluralism.
It should also represent Iran's ethnic minorities, including Balushis, Kurds, and Arabs, and have specified a ratified plans for asserting and guaranteeing their rights.
There should be a commitment to the full inclusion of women in all parts of the government, which is, of course, even symbolized strongly by the fact that a woman runs this group, which would be a revolution in and of itself for the Middle East and for the Muslim world.
During the 57-year reign of the Pahlavi monarchy and the subsequent 43 years as the Mullahs have been in power, only the dominant political point of one party has been allowed.
And this should be a multi-party system, rejection of any kind of dictatorship, the dismantlement of the IRGC, the right of freedom of religion, no state religion, a non-nuclear Iran, end of the death penalty.
Do you know that more people are executed in Iran than any country on earth?
Wow.
That was true during the Shah, too.
The Shah used the death penalty when he wasn't just killing people, you know, having the Savak kill them.
So this was published at the time that Masa Amini, remember, now she was a Kurd, you should know.
And she was visiting Tehran.
So she was what we call in, what we call describing Iran an ethnic minority, but the Kurds, a very large number of them.
And she was accosted by the morality police, you might remember, and of wearing her mandatory head covering, not wearing it, but wearing it too loosely.
After being severely beaten at a re-education center, she fell into a coma and eventually died at a hospital.
That, of course, sparked protests all over the country that came pretty close to overthrowing this regime.
But you had Biden in the White House who was financing them.
We provided more money to the country that supports terrorism than any other country on earth.
Obama did, he did it in cash, and Biden did.
And we gave no support to this revolution, whereas Trump has gave a great deal of support to the protests in 2018 and 2019 and has, of course, given a lot of support to these protests.
And we're still in a situation where America has a massive military force within striking distance of Iran.
And there's a great deal of speculation that that's going to happen.
It's actually a leak that it was planned and put off.
Whether that's true or not, again, I say that was a leak, but I'd say all the experts watching this, including this one, feel that that's going to happen.
That's going to happen.
And my recommendation is that that be used, that attack be used for the purpose of wiping out as much of the IRGC as possible, as well as their arms and munitions and to make the task of the protesters who are capable of armed revolution.
They were a very material part of the armed revolution against the Shah and have been preparing for this every day since every day since the Shah was in power, but certainly every day since what was it, 88 or 89, when 20 or 30,000 of them were killed by the regime, similar to what happened on January 6, 7, and 8.
So Madame Rajavi laid out the six requests because unlike the Shah, she's a leader and she's very, very practical about getting this done.
And they've thought through this for 30, 40 years, how to do this with plans for every agency to keep it going, to make sure that there's an election, to make sure there are outside observers, to try to keep the, as we say, the ethnic minorities as part of Iran so it doesn't splinter, because that could easily lead to a civil war.
In fact, there are some of the ethnic minorities saying if it goes the wrong way and they end up with a dictator or a monarch or the Shah, that that could easily happen.
You'd have a splitting off of the Kurds, a splitting off of the Aziris, which create a war in the entire region because Turkey wouldn't know what to do.
The Aziris, they probably would love to see split off because they're Turks and they could expand their empire given their control over Azerbaijan.
And the Kurds, they would fiercely oppose because if the Kurds were to split off, they would try very, very hard to push a Kurdistan, which would involve taking some of Turkey and taking some of Iraq.
So it is very, very important not only that we overthrow the Ayatollah, but that we make sure that we have a proper transition.
And unlike Iraq, where we did the overthrow, and then we did the empire or nation building, sorry, the nation building, right?
Here, we're not being asked to supply troops.
We're not being asked to supply arms.
We're just being asked to support them.
We're adding, meaning us Americans who agree with this, which include many, many.
Former Secretary of State Pompeo spoke at the rally in Berlin.
Many senators are very outspoken, others, including Democrats.
And I think there would be very, very strong support for the president taking out a good complement of the Revolutionary Guard.
And should that happen, you'd make the task of the revolutionaries easier.
But they're going to stay at it no matter what.
Here's what, on behalf of a coalition of 26 different groups that represent most of these people that are on the street, the MEK alone, over the course of this regime, has lost 120,000 people.
Call for International Action00:02:33
That's just the MEK.
And they are the group that the Ayatollah fears the most.
So the people who tell you that they're not consequential just have to listen to the quotes from the Ayatollah, who has been forced to go public because they threaten his regime so much.
So Madame Rajavi asked that one, that the nations, and then she's focusing this on the United Nations and the West.
Number one, recognize the right of the people to overthrow a dictatorial, theocratic, one-party regime that's been persecuting them.
Just recognize the right to do that, the way we did like in Poland.
Number two, the UN should put a stop to the executions.
Now, Madame Rajavi is discreet.
I would say the UN hasn't done anything to help peace or settle wars since its inception.
I mean, maybe the Korean War, which they ended up in a tie and helped to assure the split. of Korea between communism and freedom.
Since then, they haven't even attempted.
Nor have American presidents from Clinton to Trump ever considered them valuable to do anything like this.
Number three, she asked that they help provide an open internet.
Number four, that they bring charges of crimes against humanity against the top regime people.
Number five, that they close the embassies in their countries, like several countries did, throwing them out when they were engaged in murder plots, including trying to murder me.
And six, cutting off the financial lifeline.
Now, you don't have to ask the United States to do that, but there are some countries that still help provide money to Iran.
And she's asking that they stop.
And that would be a program that would give them the room to overthrow the regime.
Well, we're going to take a break, and we'll be right back.
Liver Health Formula Promo00:03:38
For the first time ever, we're bringing you MyPillow mattresses and mattress toppers for as low as $99.98.
Remember, sleep's all about temperature and pressure points.
Whatever sleep needs you have, we have the right technology for you.
Like our My Pillow Mattress Topper, our Queen Size has over 10,000 individual comfort supports to help relieve your pressure points.
And how about our 3-inch hybrid plus mattress topper?
It's infused with copper and silver to help your body get the restorative sleep it needs.
And our MyPillow and Case Coil mattresses, I personally helped develop these mattresses to make sure they have everything needed to give us great sleep.
Plus, they're made right here in the USA and they ship right to your front door absolutely free.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use this promo code to get my pillow mattresses and toppers for as low as $99.98 and free shipping.
If you want to drop extra pounds, boost energy levels and reduce swelling in your legs and feet, then this message is for you.
Peer Health Research is on a mission to make America healthy again.
And two of their best-selling health supplements are leading the way.
First is Liver Health Formula.
Over 100 million Americans have a sluggish liver that's riddled with fatty deposits.
This can kill your metabolism, pile on the pounds, and make you feel tired.
Liver Health Formula takes care of that.
It supports thriving liver health with special nutrients like artichoke extract and milk thistle.
This is one of the easiest ways to slim down and revitalize your energy levels.
Next is lymph system support.
If you struggle with fluid buildup or swelling in your legs, ankles, and feet, this is for you.
The natural ingredients in lymph system support help gently flush away extra fluid and toxins out of your body.
And right now, for a limited time, you can get 35% off liver health formula and lymph system support, along with 50 plus other health supplements that Peer Health Research has to offer.
So head over to PureHealthResearch.com and use promo code Lindel at checkout.
That's purehealthresearch.com.
Promo code Lindel to save 35% on your order today.
Let's face it, you can't trust Big Pharma.
They've already tried to block ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and raise prices on everything from antibiotics to your daily meds.
Well, there's good news.
All Family Pharmacy is standing up for medical freedom and helping people get the treatments they actually want.
My family and I use them all the time.
They made it easy and affordable without the runaround.
While other pharmacies are jacking up prices, they've actually dropped theirs.
Ivermectin now starts at just $2 a capsule.
Use my promo code Lindel10.
You get an extra 10% off of that.
You need ivermectin antibiotics or methylene blue, you name it, they've got it.
They make it simple.
You fill in a short online form, a licensed doctor reviews it, and your medship pass right to your front door.
If you want to be prepared and have your medications on hand, this is your new pharmacy.
Welcome to Vocal, the free speech social app that gives you a platform to amplify your voice, speak freely, connect boldly, and be part of a growing movement for truth, faith, and freedom.
Ivermectin Passes Easily00:12:46
Want to know what's happening right now?
The now playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed, a non-stop lineup, including Lindel TV News 24-7, shows and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on Vocal, you can join the live chat and be part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's Cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level from faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
Well, the right-wing conservative trend is pretty much taking over the world.
The election in Japan was overwhelming for Sunei Takachi.
And she won an unbelievable victory.
Her party, the Liberal Democrat Party of Japan, is the conservative party in Japan.
It was the party of Shinzo Abe, who was the longest-serving Japanese prime minister, and as you remember, a very close friend of President Trump's.
If anything, Takachi is even more conservative.
She is a very, very strong opponent of Red China and North Korea.
She is a very strong proponent of substantially rearming Japan and having them capable of defending themselves and helping the United States along with South Korea, Philippines, in defending against China and particularly defending against China's taking Taiwan, which she's vocal about.
So she is in a coalition.
She is in a coalition with another party so I can get their name.
the Japan Innovation Party.
Together, the two right-wing parties won 350 for a 465 votes.
I wish we could have that, Ted.
Right.
350 for, that's a, now, her own party, just her own party, won 316 of 465 votes.
But with the Innovation Party, extra 40 so votes, they end up with a veto-proof majority, which although you'd say, well, she's the prime minister, it allows them to override whatever may be done by the smaller so-called upper house, their version of the Senate.
The way their constitution works, if you can get a two-thirds vote of the lower house, which is the House of the People, then that would override any blockage that the upper house would have for her programs.
So this assures, this assures her ability to put through her defense program unhindered and with complete support.
And it was a hell of a gutsy move because she just was elected a few months ago, and she called what was called the snap election, given the parliamentary system they have.
They get elected for a term.
I don't know exactly what the term is there, four or five years probably.
But whenever they feel they need support or whenever they feel the government is failing or whatever, they can call an election.
So she called an election right away.
And many people thought it was a terrible mistake.
But she obviously is a very, very skilled politician.
And as we'll point out on the eight o'clock show, there's also a victory for the Conservative Party in Thailand.
We're surrounding a place called Red Shiner, aren't we?
There was quite a controversy over that video that took place in which near the end of the video, near the end of the video, there was a depiction of the Obamas and like a Lion King outfit or something.
And of course, it was called racist.
The president of the United States said he never saw it, which is quite likely.
I mean, when you're busy and you're running a government, a lot of things are put out by your staff.
You don't review everything.
He saw the very beginning of it, didn't see the end of it.
Had he seen the end of it, he would have been very displeased with it and not put it out.
It was a mistake.
There's every reason to believe that that's correct.
He's not stupid.
And there's nothing about Donald Trump that suggests that he's a racist at all.
I've known him for 40 years, I think.
And his relationship with the black community, black people, is as normal as it can be, a hell of a lot more normal than the Democrats.
Now, these phonies are doing this while they're opposing voter identification in the Senate and calling it Jim Crow II.
Jim Crow were the laws that prevented blacks from participating in elections in the South.
They were all passed by the Democrat Party, opposed by the Republican Party.
So Schumer just probably doesn't know history, what he said.
Yeah, Jim Crow II is how condescendingly you treat the black voter.
In the words of Malcolm X, the biggest enemy of the Black people in America is a white liberal.
And their whole approach to their whole approach to voter identification is exactly that.
Harris, who probably didn't know what she was saying, people have to understand that when we're talking about voter ID laws, in some people's mind, that means you're going to have to Xerox or photocopy your ID to send it in to prove who you are.
Well, there are a whole lot of people, especially people who live in rural communities, who don't.
There's no Kinkos.
There's no office max there.
Don't they have driver's licenses?
And I don't know.
When you're talking about the minority vote, aren't you talking about big cities and not rural communities?
But how would she know?
I mean, Russia is a big country and Ukraine is a small country and that's what the war was about.
Then you've got Jamie Raskin, who could be one of the more despicable human beings.
He says that voter ID, the SAVE Act, which is the Voter ID Act, which requires you to produce an ID in order to vote.
It might violate the 19th Amendment, which gives women the right to vote, because you've got to show that all of your different IDs match.
So if you're a woman that's gotten married and you've changed your name to your husband name, now your current name is different.
Well, don't you have to do that to get on airplanes?
Don't you have to do that to get welfare?
Of course you do.
If you're going to change your name, you've got to change your name.
There are any number of reasons why you have voter ID.
Now, the simple fact is, I want you to look at this.
This came up a couple of years ago, and the same thing.
This guy went to Harlem and asked black people, who, by the way, support voter ID by 80%.
Let's look at how they react to it rather than just hearing from me.
Now I'm here in East Harlem to ask black people their thoughts on what you just heard.
Do you have ID, Norway?
You carry ID wrong?
Yes, that's state ID.
Do you carry ID?
Yes, I do.
Do you know anybody, any black person who doesn't carry ID?
No.
Everyone that I know has an ID.
Why would they think they don't have ID?
That's a lie.
Why would they say that?
Do you have ID?
Yes.
Because I have my ID and my friends have their ID, so we know what we need to carry around.
Everybody that I know have ID.
Like, that's one of the things you need to walk around with in New York with ID.
Do you know any black adult who does not have ID?
No, I don't.
Is it a weird thing to even say that?
Yes, it is.
What is this?
Some type of trick candy cameras.
I know, right?
That's the only thing I brought with me.
Those are legit IDs.
I heard a lot also that black people can't figure out how to get to the DMV.
What's that saying to you?
I know it's that volume 250.
Do you know where the ID?
I could have kept going, but it's funny.
How condescending is that?
That's racism.
But it isn't really.
Every single one of these liars knows that they have ID.
Why would you be in favor 80 to 90% of the American people think there should be voter ID?
Why would you be in favor of no voter ID?
Just take a guess.
Because you want to cheat.
What do you think we're stupid?
And the Democratic Party, despite the protestations of the New York Times, there isn't much cheating in our elections.
Democratic Party has been cheating in elections for 160 years.
I mean, I know it from the history of New York.
In New York, they cheat in elections, even when they don't have to, to keep in practice.
I mean, if there's an overwhelming election, they'll still cheat so that they can be in practice when they have to cheat in a close election.
The same thing is true in all of the crooked Democrat cities.
They cheat like crazy.
And it's been going on forever.
And it's part of the whole corruption of that party, which has become now, I mean, voter cheating was the least of it.
Now they seem to be engaged in anti-American conduct, destruction of law enforcement, defunding the police, hatred of Jewish people.
I don't know what's happened to the Democrat Party that I once, a long time ago, was a member of and with whom I had very, very good relationships when I was the mayor.
I don't know what's happened to it.
But, you know, you look at New York with Mamdani, I know what's happened to it.
It's been taken control of by Marxists and then a lot of weaklings.
Well, come over to X.
We will continue.
We've got plenty more to cover, plenty of things you need to know that you're not going to hear like that response to voter ID.
And you probably don't know, although 80% of you to 90% of you support voter ID, that most of the Democrats are going to do everything they can to block it.
Just like they're going to block school choice, even though 60 to 70% of black people support school choice, Democratic Party makes it impossible in Democrat states so that the teachers union can remain in control and the kids can get a terrible education, which we will cover immediately when we take up on X and the other channels and show you some startling statistics.