America's Mayor Live (816): Trump Administration Halts Afghan Immigration Requests After DC Attack
|
Time
Text
remember this normal anytime Good evening.
This is Rudy Giuliani and this is America's mayor live, live from Washington Dc.
Yep, Washington Dc, and uh, we even went out and walked around because of president Trump.
It's safe now, not like it used to be right.
And Janine Bureau and the National Guard that they all make fun of and shoot and shoot, huh right.
So it is a kind of the news is coming out of here to uh tonight, to some extent because of the argument of the Supreme Court, which was enormously uh uh, enormously interesting and and probably you know a lot of.
A lot of lawyers love to say you can't tell how the court's going to decide by the questions they ask.
Most of the time you can do they fool you sometimes yes, but judges most judges are too damn busy to play a law professor and they believe they have a position this way when they really have a position that way.
Now, when they are truly confused right, they will do that, and you can usually tell the difference between when they are um right, when they're truly confused, particularly when you're talking about the Supreme Court, which you get to see, you know, three times a week.
Um, from what I could see here I didn't see it.
I just looked at some of the, the work, the transcripts and the questions, and also this is a little different.
This has a lot of history to it.
Humphrey's Executor is like five, six decades old and the court has been uh, struggling with it for forever because you know like uh like um uh, like some of the other the decisions.
You know where Brown Board OF Education had to reverse a precedent that was almost 100 years old or this case was always wrong.
The case was an incorrect case.
You knew that from law school and it was done really because of the overreach of Rose Roosevelt.
Roosevelt was packing all of the these independent agencies.
He was throwing people out, putting his own people on.
He was even talking about packing the court.
Remember, and um originally originally, the Republican Supreme Court which Roosevelt had for a good deal of his first three or four years, uh had originally before Roosevelt uh, uh basically upheld the power of the president to be able to fire people for any reason he wanted to hiring he would need advice and consent,
but firing the constitution and the Constitutional Congress and the president for certain important positions needed the advice and consent of Senate.
But the president should have complete freedom to fire because he shouldn't be forced to have someone on board that he doesn't trust or who will not carry out his policies.
Otherwise, he's doomed to fail.
You can't hold an executive accountable and not allow him to have the people that he wants in order to carry out his mandate.
And then, if he doesn't, he's the guy that got to suffer at the polls, not the judges.
So, and that's what the democracy part of our republic is about.
We're not a complete democracy, but we are not a complete non-democracy either.
We have aspects of both with checks and balances.
But the Supreme Court and Humphrey's executor decided that Roosevelt had gone too far and said he couldn't do the firing because there wasn't cause.
And they were really doing that more as a Republican and even Democrat conservative response to Roosevelt's overreaching.
And from the time it was decided, almost, well, 10, 20 years left alone, almost from the time it was decided, by the time I was even in law school, it was considered to be a decision that eventually is going to get thrown out because it's inconsistent with the separation of powers.
The president can't reach in and remove the speaker or tell them what to do with the speaker.
Well, they can't reach in and tell him what to do with his appointees.
So it sounds like the court's going to reverse it and allow the president.
It's an FTC commissioner, if I recall, to remove the commissioner, hence all of them really.
The big question is, what are they going to do about the Fed?
And the Fed, it looks like they're trying to create a special category for.
Now, I don't know how intellectually honest that really is, that special category for the Fed.
It's more a function of the Fed has over time developed this myth of apolitical behavior.
Everything I've seen of the Fed, they're totally political, including under the last Biden administration.
Powell was in, well, Powell, I was going to say he was in Biden's pocket, but he was actually in the Autopen's pocket.
We didn't have a president.
He was in the Politburo's pocket, whoever they were, the unknown, the unknown three or four or five who ran the government rather than the president, because we know the president couldn't run it.
I think it is absolutely pathetic, by the way, that they're trying to play.
I mean, this thing that Democrats do, where everything they do, they blame on you, or they make believe you did it, is getting to be absurd.
They're now arguing that Trump is senile.
Jeez, if he's senile, you want to be senile like he is.
Three-hour press conferences, two-hour press conferences, travels all night, gets up and has a has has a has a press conference and a meeting.
There's nothing senile about him.
In fact, he's sometimes you just hold your breath and say, oh my God, he is quite remarkable.
Remember the federal government got a, didn't they have a big settlement with Harvard?
Right.
And Harvard also, you know, Harvard is the one that really started all this.
They lost a big case in the Supreme Court for discriminating against Asian students.
Right.
Because the Asians were passing all the exams and getting all the high marks and they couldn't get into Harvard.
Harvard was filled with less accomplished blacks and whites even than Asians.
And they lost that case big time.
The president had, you know, 5 million different discrimination things against Harvard, plus their horrible treatment of the Jewish people.
Well, they're doing it again.
There's a federal complaint that was filed over a race-restricted scholarship program.
And the program is limited just to people of color.
That's like waving the red flag in front of the Supreme Court.
It's like, I don't know, it's like almost like contempt.
I mean, the U.S. Supreme Court told Harvard to stop.
Now, the justifying, we have to go in and enforce it.
It was in 2023 when the Supreme Court determined that affirmative action programs for admission are unconstitutional, not do not comply with the Equal Protection Clause.
Race is race, and you can't use it as a basis for preferring one over another in a school that gets government funds.
And Harvard gets plenty of government funds, as we know.
Right.
In this particular program, the applicants must be a college student of a historically marginalized community.
The phrase historically marginalized community is often used as an alternative to say underrepresented minority, by and large, black, even more than Hispanic.
Now, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act restricts institutions of higher learning from deliberately discriminating on the basis of race, and it prohibits them from getting federal funds.
So, once again, they're going to get their funds hit.
But they just don't learn, which is why they're a terrible school.
Imagine we know they can't teach, but we see the students marching in the streets, and they actually think Israel has been occupying Gaza and haven't been occupying Gaza, if at all.
Just a short time.
What brings you out tonight?
I'm here to support the NYU students protesting for Palestine.
Are you an NYU student?
I'm not.
I'm a Fordham student.
Fordham, okay.
And what would you say is the main goal with tonight's protest?
I think the goal is just showing our support for Palestine and demanding that NYU stop.
I honestly don't know all of what NYU is doing.
Is there something that NYU is doing?
I really don't know.
I'm pretty sure they're.
Do you know what NYU is doing about Israel?
Why are we protesting here?
Oh, stop!
We'll be free!
I wish I was more educated.
I'm not either.
I came from Columbia.
What are the other ones say?
I'm not educated on this.
I wish I was more educated.
Yeah, I wish you were more educated.
All of you.
I wish you were more educated because you're a bunch of dummies.
Your knowledge of history is like frightening.
Well, in that connection, they just graded the top schools on anti-Semitism on American college campuses.
Now, how about this?
39% of Jewish college students in the United States felt the necessity to hide their identities as Jews on campus.
And 62% said they have been directly blamed for Israel's military action in Gaza.
In other words, the action trying to save themselves from annihilation.
Anti-Semitism on American campuses is systemic and tolerated.
About 58% of the respondents said they have personally experienced anti-Semitism on campus.
Only 12% said that those incidents were addressed at all.
65% described a feeling of being unwelcome on specific campus spaces.
And 58 agreed that their school have failed to protect them.
Both Columbia and the new school have received F grades for allowing this pervasive anti-Semitism.
Some of the others, Harvard, Yale, Brown, University of Pennsylvania, MIT, the new school, Northwestern, Pomona College, Portland State University, of course, UC Berkeley, of course, UC Davis, University of Oregon, University of Pennsylvania, University of Washington, and good old Yale University.
they are anti, they got an F on being fair to Jewish people.
So the only Ivy League school that didn't fail was Dartmouth.
It received the highest grade for Ivy League schools with a B rating.
And only 15 schools received an A rating.
And we should get you their names.
They don't have it here.
That isn't right.
The schools that got an A rating should get should be, we'll find those out for you and give you those tomorrow.
Because I like Baylor, Clemson, Elon, and Colorado State.
Cornell went from an F to a C, which I guess, which I guess is pretty darn good, huh?
And Vassar College went from a D to a B. NYU, when you were there, got to a C.
They had been an F. Got to a C.
They got to a C.
I did a lot better at NYU than they're doing.
Should get my degree back.
All my money back.
While C's get degrees, the mayor was likely an all-A student or a damn.
Not quite, but I was a good student.
Close, which I think those are the best students, the ones that are maybe just short of like, you know, A plus, but you know, the A, A minus range.
Maybe that's me just being self-interest, right?
So everyone thinks that old Vladimir, the murderer of Moscow, who got, you know, caught up in another poisoning murder last week in London, is doing just great on this war.
You know, he's doing just terrific on this war against Ukraine.
The fact is, the country is becoming punier and punier and punier every day.
And one of the things it's losing out on is it has now been written off completely as having any capacity to be a major AI player.
That Russia has fallen so far behind the United States and China, it will never be able to catch them because they can't, first of all, they don't have the money because they're spending the money killing Ukrainians and hiring soldiers at unbelievable amounts of money to kill Ukrainians.
And number two, and the oil situation is straining their economy mightily, and they don't have the attention span for it.
And also, nobody wants to do business with them.
What they did in Ukraine not only got the United States angry, seems to have gotten Europe even angrier.
So they depended for a good deal of their economy, not just on the U.S., but they depended on Europe.
And European countries want nothing to do with them.
And this AI contest, which is really between the United States and China, we weren't paying enough attention to it.
Trump has gotten us right back into the ball game and keep, I mean, what Biden did was fritter away an almost impregnable lead to the point where the prediction was that China would pass us very, very shortly.
That has changed.
It's not as if there isn't still jeopardy and there isn't still a race, but we are a much, much bigger player in it.
And you can see that behind many, many of these deals is AI.
Trump's knowledge that, as many say, whoever controls AI will be the military power of the world.
Because you can have the weapons, but the AI, AI will probably be constantly figuring out ways to render them useless.
So this is a big blow for Putin.
And you wonder if he realizes the damage that he's done to himself.
I mean, that doesn't bring back all those people in Ukraine that he needlessly killed or his own soldiers who he got needlessly killed.
But it does create some degree of justice and also maybe a warning to more reasonable people that a war is not without tremendous consequences.
I mean, you can't conduct it for nothing.
And unless you have just an economy that's running on all cylinders, like we had in the Second World War, or we could have again.
I mean, if we geared up our economy, and we are, I think we're doing, I mean, some people feel we're doing it too slowly.
I think we may be doing it quite deliberately.
But I mean, you want to not worry about jobs.
You just make sure that we make our military defenses completely modern and we'll have a booming economy.
So, and we're going to need it.
We're going to need it because China is deadly serious about passing us.
And we have to be deadly serious for the world that they don't, because they're a horrible group of people.
The Chinese communists, that is, not the regular Chinese people who are no other than any other people who suffer from that kind of victimization.
Or the ones who have long since gone and are Chinese in name only, you know, the way I'm Italian or you may be whatever it is.
But these are among the most victimized people in the world.
I mean, how about the practice of taking live organs from live people?
Oh, yeah, they're very, really good effective organs, but yeah, get a really healthy 15-year-old athlete, get their heart for heart transplant.
You Falun Gong person, get rid of them.
Falun Gong, of course, are remarkably good condition.
They exercise all the time if you've ever watched them.
They probably have very good cardiovascular health.
And their purpose for the Falun Gong people, because they happen to be very, they happen to be devoted to peace and they're a religion, which of course is illegal in China.
Although they are and have interfered with the Catholic Church to the extent of appointing some bishops.
How about you go to a church under a bishop who's a damn communist?
Yeah, that's um, I've wondered about the Catholic Church in America for quite some time now.
So uh, well, they're just they're just silly, yeah.
I think you're right.
I thought they're gonna go as far as call them communists, but I don't know what they are.
I mean, gosh almighty even the poem.
Look, here, here they are condemning Trump for stopping illegal immigration, which saves lives, by the way.
And right in their parish or diocese, they see women getting raped and beaten up, and they see these animals that are coming in.
They have to realize that the quality and the difference in the type of immigrant that came in 20 or 30 years ago, who they're sort of, that's their fiction, is quite different than the people who come in today.
Right.
But I mean, somehow that doesn't occur to them.
And then I do wonder, and maybe this is unfair, but I don't think it is.
Everybody's just human.
They make a lot of money off this.
I mean, these are millions and millions and millions of dollars that go to Catholic charities.
Just because they're Catholic doesn't mean they're perfect, you know.
Look, look at how the Somalians were affected by that.
I don't know.
Maybe they don't want to lose all that money.
So you end up with a new immigration program like they had.
Look at what Adams people did, the amount of money they were tossing around.
Look at what Tampon Tim's people did.
Well, I think very similar in California.
I bet your state didn't handle every penny appropriately.
Michigan can't imagine.
Can't imagine.
So, Tampon, did you see?
Did you see the one where Trump goes by in the presidential limo yelling the R word?
Yeah, that's a you gotta have you seen that the meme?
Is there like an AI video of it?
I don't know what it is.
Oh, I have the original him complaining.
Oh, not him complaining.
Yes, him complaining for cry, baby.
But he's complaining that lots of people are coming by his house, and they're calling me the R word.
I thought they would call him the C word for communist, which is what he is, but they're calling him the R word.
And isn't that terrible?
So, so they have, I don't know, you call this a meme or just a fake, fake video.
They have, Trump is in a very elongated beast, you know, elongated presidential limo.
Yeah.
He's sitting on the driver's, he's sitting in the, you know, next to the driver, and he opens down the window, and you can see him deliberately a couple of times yelling out the R word.
He doesn't say it, he mouths it.
And then he smiles and he puts up the window.
I'm finding it right now.
I'm going to look for that.
We'll find it.
The first time I saw it, I thought maybe it was actually him.
Maybe he actually.
You could do that.
We could get.
We'll find this when we find that.
It's terrible.
You know, he still makes me laugh, even with even having seen him 950 times at those rallies and his press conference.
I love his press conference because they're funny.
He took off on somebody today, Ted.
Oh, playing that man.
We've got I was getting ready for the show, writing something, and I could hear it in the other room.
You had it on.
I started.
Did you hear me start laughing?
Yeah.
You were working with Dr. Maria and I was in the other room and I just started laughing.
Who did he go after?
You've got to get that for me.
Yeah, we got to find that.
But let's start.
This is, yeah, we'll get that next.
He went after Rachel Scott of ABC News, who we know has been a quin.
I mean, she spends her, oh, he gets her good.
But I did get this is the president on calling Tim Walz retarded.
This isn't AI.
So I thought we'd share this because it's real now.
That's not one of those babies.
Right.
We got it.
Yeah.
One of those diaper diplomacy.
Yeah.
We didn't want to overdo those.
So we've taken a pause.
So here's President Trump.
I wish we didn't.
I like that.
What many Americans do find in events that were retarded?
Do you stand by that claim of calling Tim Walz retarded?
Yeah, I think there's something wrong with him.
Absolutely.
You don't need to have a problem with it.
You know what?
I think there's something wrong with him.
Anybody that would do what he did, anybody that would allow those people into his state and pay billions of dollars out to Somalia.
We give billions of dollars to Somalia.
It's not even a country because it doesn't function like a country.
So I don't know if you can hear that, Mayor, if I got to turn the volume up over there, but a reporter was trying to get him on this.
You know, oh, some people find it offensive.
Do you stand by your comments that Tim Walz is retarded?
The president just quickly answers, yeah, there's something wrong with him.
And he's absolutely right.
And do you know how many countries are in countries?
And they really are organized crime groups.
Oh, God, it's almost close to a majority of the UN.
Their behavior in New York is, I mean, they make some of the gangs look pretty good.
Right.
The UN people, I'm telling you about it.
Yeah, and you, you really opened my eyes up.
Uh-oh.
I'll get out of that.
It's hilarious.
We have a little puddle there.
Whoa!
Oh, well, everything.
Everything happened then.
I think we're getting, we're here.
We're in Washington.
What do you think?
Well, the Biden's got winner here, but they're gone out of office.
Do you think it's a minor earthquake?
What do you think?
Or the swamp overflowing with?
I understand people saw Chuck Schumer and they got scared.
Yeah.
Chuck Schumer is hanging around somewhere.
Yeah, Chuck Schumer is coming up out of the Chuck Schumer.
I don't want to be asked any questions about Israel that he double-crossed.
We've had a minor spill off camera.
We do have to take care of it because of just what's close to some just water.
Yeah, just water, but it's close to some of our electronic equipment.
Aqua.
I don't want it to damage the.
If you see me electrocuted during the show, you know, this is the reason because Ted is taking care of the water right near the wire stage.
He's taking care of the water.
Or he may get executed.
Let's get a camera on him just in case.
See what happens with his hair.
See, my hair, you wouldn't be able to tell.
There's more there.
Yeah, but they do a pretty good job of protecting people, folks.
Yeah, yeah, no, no, we'll be okay.
You just hear a large flash.
I spent two hours today with my granddaughter.
I had lunch with her.
She was just beautiful and hilarious.
She's getting so big.
She just turned four.
And she describes her birthday party to us.
Yeah.
How long ago did she try that?
She might be like Trump.
I asked how many people were at a birthday party.
I think he said four.
How many?
She said, I don't know.
Like 20 kids or 25 kids, I think.
She said 400.
400?
She said something like something like that.
400.
Standing room only.
You should have seen it outside the party.
Shouldn't have seen the line they couldn't have.
And then she insists that she's a big girl.
Yeah, she's only four, she's a big girl.
So cute at that age they start talking and yeah oh yeah oh, she had a lot to say today.
Yeah, she was the best.
Kids are the best.
We went to lunch and she was just really funny that we walked through the Christmas um, whatever you call that the Mark Christmas market.
Yeah, she liked that.
Oh yeah sure, she's all excited about christmas.
I I, I told her, I told her that when I was mayor uh, about the week before christmas, either some of his people or Sandra himself would call the mayor to ask him what the weather, what the weather was going to be like.
And you know, if she, if she wanted, I put in a good word for her, I put in a good word for her.
So I said to her, have you been good?
Oh yes yes papa, i've been very, i've been very good.
Okay, all right, I have a few other questions.
You listen to your mother and father?
Yes okay sure, so let's, let's.
Uh, should we take a break first, or shall we listen to uh?
Should we listen to the president?
Let's talk.
So this is, oh oh, you want to start with the president on?
You want to start with the president on his use of the r word?
Yeah oh we, we played that one right.
Yeah, we just played this one.
But I was thinking maybe we'll transition to the meeting today where uh, the president demonstrates that he is in fact the opposite of the r word uh, and demonstrates this with uh, a interaction with ABC NEWS.
This is the president of the United States.
Well, they've been doing a big thing over the weekend.
Somebody did a big thing on his being.
Uh, maybe it was Rachel Madgow.
This is a good one.
Here we go.
This is today.
She's got her own set of infirmities.
I don't know if I, if I would, it's like the pot call in the kettle black.
Let's watch the full video of that strike on september 2nd off the coast of Venezuela.
Secretary Hegsteth now says, you said that I didn't say that this is ABC fake news.
You said that you would have no problem releasing the full bit okay.
Well, secretary Hegseth, whatever Hegseth wants to do is okay with.
He now says it's under review.
Are you ordering the secretary to release that full video?
Whatever he decides is okay with me.
So every boat we knock out of the water.
Every boat we save 25 000 American lives.
Uh, that was a boat loaded up with drugs.
I saw the video.
They were trying to turn the boat back to where it could float and we didn't want to see that because that boat was loaded up with drugs, just like everything else.
But every boat we shoot down and I don't know if you know, we're 92 or 94 percent down in drugs coming in by the sea and we're trying to find who are the six percent, because I, I don't know, people aren't liking to drive boats right now loaded up with drugs but every single put think of that every single boat we shoot at, on average we save 25 000 American lives.
Do you feel okay About that, Corey?
Keep us safe.
Okay.
I know my man.
What about you?
Okay, we're not.
Didn't I just tell you that?
You said that it was the most obnoxious reporter in the whole place.
Let me just tell you, you are an obnoxious, a terrible, actually, a terrible reporter.
And it's always the same thing with you.
I told you, whatever Pete Hakeseth wants to do is okay with him.
Wow.
How many presidents would be willing to do that?
He is.
I mean, the problem is he did this the first term, and then we went back to Biden.
And Biden, I don't even know if he was ever at the White House, right?
And he got away with that.
So I'd like to think he's transformed the presidency forever, right?
That these four in the future will have to be just this open, this transparent with the American people.
I'm not convinced that'll be the case, though, right?
Because he did this the first term.
Right.
And then Biden came back.
The guy went, we don't even know if he was ever there, right?
Donald Penn was signing these things.
Right.
He's answered that question.
He's answered that question so many times.
I have his answer memorized.
So this is just in order to keep a negative.
I mean, please understand, because some people may look at that and say, oh, he was unnecessarily harsh.
Please understand that this is an absolute strategy to try to keep his popularity low.
Because although lots of people, like me and Ted, and possibly a good many of you will look at that and you realize that this, in fact, it may make you like him more because he's being tortured this way, as happened during the Russian collusion thing.
There are a solid group of people who feed off that.
And it just convinces them that he's a bad president.
And they keep doing it and doing it.
And they're just hoping by throwing as much mud as they can, as constantly as they can, they're going to get him dirty.
And nobody else is going to defend him.
He's got a few people, obviously, that can defend him, but I mean, nobody else can defend him quite the way he can.
And after a while, they go so far that unless you're really consumed with some kind of a Trump derangement disease, When they change transcripts and they take a transcript and they he says something here and then he says something an hour later and they put it together to make it sound like it said something bad and then they don't tell you they did that.
I mean that's just deliberate lying and that's because they hate they.
I don't they hate him so much.
I mean exactly what harm has he done to the country?
I mean, unless you're an illegal, you know, I don't, I don't get it.
He's treated.
He's treated his adversaries a heck of a lot nicer than they treated him.
Even the prosecutions that he's brought.
He didn't go put ankle bracelets on them and stick them in solitary confinement and think all that crap, Raid their houses like it did to me.
And think of what we went through with the 2016 election.
And think of all the clear evidence of Secretary Hillary Clinton's going way back.
I don't want to get into it, but you know, going back to the hard drive and her computer email messages when she was at state.
And he didn't even, and you don't involve any private conversations you've had, Mayor.
But I've heard it's been reported that he did not want to go after her and some of these others in order to protect our democratic system.
Yes, in order to maintain the idea that we don't do vindictive prosecutions after an election.
But the reality is, and I've felt this very strongly, even back then, these people are way, way out of control.
They're way beyond the norm in terms of negative campaigning and where, you know, yes, it always has been negative campaigning.
But these people try to, you know, destroy you.
They don't try to defeat you.
They try to put you in jail, which destroys you.
They try to take away all your property.
They try to bankrupt you.
And I can tell you that's my, I can tell you, they did it to me.
And I'm going to tell you, I didn't do anything except be a lawyer.
And it's extraordinary what they got away with.
Got me disbarred.
So he's got a real, he's got a real issue he's dealing with.
And we're only going to be able to fix this country if we fix education, we fix the media.
How do people get their information, right?
Unless they are extremely industrious and like to read original sources.
And even that's hard, right?
Because the original source will be maybe you compare three newspapers.
You're not going to see very often the original documents.
So this constant repetition can help.
It doesn't necessarily even mean you beat him like he was able to overcome it two out of three times, even overcome their cheating.
But it does mean you make him less effective that way.
So we can't achieve as much of his agenda, which they're opposed to.
Although I think they're opposed to his personality more than his agenda, because he's so honest with them.
And they really are a bunch of phonies.
These people are newsreaders.
These aren't, you know, how little they really know about the world.
The modern ones in particular, they never covered a war.
They went to silly schools where they were taught silly things.
And they're probably really good at naming all the genders.
So I have to name all the members of the U.N. You know, they're looking for we know it from they're looking for getting out of the White House as early as possible and then they go to the bar.
Right.
It's a great press score.
Very, very distinguished.
So shall we take a short break?
And we'll be right back.
U.S. Army Major Scott Smiley paid a high price serving our nation.
Scott was leading his platoon in Iraq when a blast sent shrapnel through his eyes, leaving him blind and temporarily paralyzed.
Scott would become the first blind, active duty military officer before medically retiring years later.
Thanks to friends like you, the Tunnels and Towers Foundation gave Scott and his family a mortgage-free, specially adapted smart home.
Show your support for America's heroes now.
Donate $11 a month to Tunnels of Towers at t2t.com.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action!
Get the elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month.
Including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports, movies, news, even daytime dramas.
We're talking about ESPN, OAN, Newsmax, channels you can't get anymore in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Endless selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Wow.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly, where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to quxnow.com and get yours.
Here we are, pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers because they'd like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
they're gonna go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so oh my goodness Look at these.
My goodness, you're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
Bring it up.
Well, this is Rudy Giuliari, and we're back with America's Mayor Live from Washington, D.C.
Now, we haven't done America's Mayor Live in Washington, D.C. that much, maybe about 10 times or so, 12 times.
I used to do my podcast here a lot because all during the time I represented President Trump, not all during the time, but for a good deal.
The last year that I represented him, I had a podcast every, I had two per week, and I was on radio every day.
So I would have in the hotel, I would have a place to do both, a little studio to do both.
And I did most of them, most of the ABC live broadcasts and most of the podcasts in Washington.
So it's not unfamiliar for me to do things here.
But I do prefer real America rather than this place, which always is the danger point.
You see, the real purpose of socialism and communism is to develop a very, very large central government.
It's just a small table.
A very, very, very large central government.
Now, you say, well, that's good.
Let's have a central government and it'll do all these things very efficiently.
Now, a central government is like when you call the Motor Vehicle Bureau or you call about your credit card or your bank, which let's say would be, you know, should be based on profit motive more efficient than a government.
You know, so you call your government and you are you're you're starving, you have no means of food, and they say, well, you know, dial one for the general manager, dial two for the assistant general manager, dial three for the resource department head, dial four for the psychiatrist who's going to help you with your frustration,
dial five for the big liar who bullshit you, you know, that kind of thing.
The government becomes very, very remote.
And then because it can't accomplish much, it becomes, particularly the ones who believe in socialism anyway, becomes very dictatorial because people who are conservative and people who are free market, libertarian, really believe that we shouldn't get in your way.
You should figure out the answers to things and work it out best in local communities and in government closest to the people.
So our idea of maximum freedom is as little central government as possible.
Central government necessarily can take your freedom away because it's going to impose top-down rules, like for what they've, how they've destroyed medicine, right?
So they come up with the best formula for treating a disease.
Then they put behind it the incentive of the drugs are going to cost less and the whole treatment thing is going to cost less if you follow the formula.
Now, this may or may not be the best way to treat the disease.
This may be the most profitable way to treat the disease for the particular pharmaceutical organization.
But in any event, there is no cookie-cutter way to treat a disease.
There's no such thing as you give this medicine on day one and then two more on day two and one more on day three and one more on day four or five.
But if you follow that, you get reimbursed.
If you don't, you don't get your full reimbursement.
So you have a dictator.
And the whole genius of America, of course, is from the ground, from the ground up.
That's why we're going to beat the shit out of China.
That's why we're going to beat the shit out of my AI.
Because if we unleash that and Trump is doing everything he can to unleash that, it's the most powerful force on earth.
The force of the liberated America, the liberated American mind and soul.
There's no group of people that have accomplished as much as we have in a short period of time and in as benign a way.
So we're going to have to figure out how to do it.
This wire is too short.
So it pulls.
It's pulling.
It doesn't like what I'm saying.
And I've been so nice tonight too.
Haven't taken off after anybody.
Got a few people.
Holidays are coming.
So when I told my little granddaughter about Santa, I was thinking about myself.
I mean, I don't want them to get too upset with me.
So the president has kicked in $24 billion aid package for our farmers who are getting slammed by the immediate effects of the trade, of the trade wars.
We're gaining a lot with these trade wars, but also there's always somebody that's a loser in the trade wars.
And we sure don't want it to be our farmers.
So that's why these tariffs are supposed to kill us.
And if anything, we've got a very, very strong economy right now.
I mean, we've got a few little problems, but nothing of major significance.
This Netflix deal is a very, very interesting deal, very interesting antitrust case and a very interesting deal.
So Warner Brothers, Warner Brothers is up for sale.
And Netflix has offered $72 billion to acquire Warner Brothers.
Now, that's a very simple way to describe it, with a lot of different incentives to different levels of stockholders and whatever.
At the same time, Paramount wants to acquire Warner Brothers.
And one of the issues is going to be whether Netflix's acquisition of Warner Brothers is a violation of the antitrust laws.
Because in the streaming market, I think, I think they're all whopping, they're making a whopping 80%.
Now, 80% of a market, there's no one percentage that de facto says you've got a monopoly because you have to show then monopoly power in the exercise of it,
meaning how you can control prices, how you can control demand, how you control supply, how you can wipe out competitors by virtue of your having that large part of the market and the practices that you engage in.
But it's a good start.
It gets you pretty darn close to a prima facie case.
So Paramount, who today said it was going to back off what it was doing, but at the same time sent out, maybe these letters were sent out before.
They claim to the stockholders that they will be a better deal for Warner Brothers, because even though they're offering somewhat less money, not a lot less,
but somewhat less, the chance that it will be approved from a point of view of the antitrust and competition by the FTC, by the Justice Department, is much greater because their market share isn't as great.
And they actually would then set up what they don't have right now, which is a really effective competition for Netflix.
So that can be a very interesting argument.
Below the surface, there is what the press is buzzing about, which is the Trump issue.
So the Trump issue is that, of course, he is not, Trump is not very happy with Netflix.
I don't know about Warner Brothers up and down, really.
I don't think he's really, let's put it this way.
The Paramount people are his friends, the Ellisons, particularly the father.
They've been friends for a very long time.
And he's a terrific guy.
I like him very much.
And therefore, the feeling is that he would be maybe more.
I mean, let's face it, I mean, the press is ridiculous when they deal with him.
There is no discipline.
It's like Everything is a trap question, and everything is the most negative way of looking at something, or somebody Democrats gave him talking points, and they asked the talking points.
And therefore, to have a Netflix that much bigger could politically be damaging for him.
On the other hand, he's also very influenced by the economics of a deal.
So it'd be interesting to see how he evaluates this.
But this is not going to be an easy ride.
And it shouldn't be, because they do have too much power.
And the more of a market you control, the more power you have, obviously, right?
You can pretty much sort of set the standard for everybody.
And at times, use your monopoly position to make that kind of ridiculous amount of money.
Interesting twist on abortion that's going on with the Obama Act, the ACA, the ACA subsidies.
So the Democrats want the Republicans to put money in to programs that perform abortions, but they don't use direct federal funds for it.
They use other people's funds for it.
And Republicans have said they're not putting any money into, they're not going to use healthcare dollars for abortions, let people pay for that themselves because there's such a debate about the morality of it, right?
And the decency of it.
So what the Republicans are saying, and the Democrats are disputing, is if they put money, let's say you're, oh, Planned Parenthood, right?
Despite all of their denials to the contrary, the chief eugenics company in America, which really is engaging in abortions in order to improve the quality of our race, which means eliminating black people for them, not for me.
I think they're a bunch of monsters.
But so they don't take money from the federal government for abortion.
The federal government won't give them money for abortions.
However, they get private funding for abortions.
And the more money they get for, money is fungible, right?
The more money they get from the federal government, the more they're going to be able to use the private contributions for abortions.
Correct?
You understand that?
So the Republicans are saying, well, it's just a sneaky way of getting around the same thing when the Democrats are asking for money for them.
It's going to mean more money for abortions.
It's going to be more flexibility for more abortions since it's one organization and it's hard to say what pays for what.
So this is going to be interesting because this has to be decided by December 15th.
And I find that, I find this debate, I find this debate extremely unnerving because,
you know, particularly because the Democrats have extended abortion so far into the pregnancy that You're clearly killing babies.
I don't know.
We'll have to see.
We'll have to see what we'll have to see what happens.
Right.
Subsidies can be used to pay for a plan that covers abortion, but emrollees have to pay a small out-of-pocket sum for the specific cause of the abortion coverage.
So that's the way it's covered right now.
So you decide whether you think that that directly or indirectly supports abortions.
But it's, you know, a major, it's a major argument and one that a lot of people in good faith have a lot of problems with.
And I really do think there's too much of a lack of respect on either side of this debate.
This is probably the most delicate debate that we have about life and any debate about life and death is extremely, when I say delicate, I really have the wrong word.
It's kind of a little beyond us as human beings because we don't have control over it.
And when we're making these rules about life and death and deciding who's going to live and who's going to die, we get into the worst possible distortions.
And people who are driven by the extremes here, it's terrible.
It's terrible.
And there is a real possibility.
Of course, you look at all these pressures on it and say, we're going to get to the point where we just don't produce children anymore.
I mean, you've got all these studies being done that nobody wants to get married.
And if you listen to the podcast we just finished editing with Tucker Carlson and the little Nazi, what's his name?
The Little Nazi?
I've forgotten.
little fella.
I call him the little fella once.
I don't know.
Maybe it was demeaning.
I shouldn't have done that.
What do you think, Ted?
You like that, yeah.
Yeah.
But he tries to act like a tough guy.
I did see one video of his, and I didn't use it, but I'm going to use it on the show of him in a little scuffle.
Man, and I can determine who can hit Nugget.
But this would be easy.
You don't have to be an expert on boxing or whatever.
Here he is.
With all these big guys around him.
All these big guys around him.
And the guy then pushes him.
So I demonstrate in the podcast, you do it this way, pal.
But he's so overbearing that you really want to put him down a little.
But you make your own decision when you watch this.
It's an analysis, mostly of him, but also of how did Tucker handle him?
Did he do his job?
His job is to get to the truth, which means he's got to ask some tough questions.
Did he?
And do we know the answers to those tough questions, despite his not being able to ask tough questions because there's such a record on here?
So the last version comes out probably tomorrow.
It also has a very, I think frightening discussion on women and their regard for women.
And I'm not a feminist.
Maybe, maybe feminist as defined by the United States Constitution and equal rights for everyone, but not feminist like they should be boxing with men or they can walk into somebody can put a dress on and walk into a ladies' room.
But their view of women, well, you see what you think.
You see what you think.
Some of it is occasioned by the modern pressures that go on, but some of it seems to be way over the top.
And I did this because I want you to be able to make your own decisions about Fuentes and Tucker and not be driven by a media, some of which despises him and some of which loves him.
And did he do the right thing or wrong thing in his interview?
Not necessarily interviewing him, which he has every right to do, but did he handle the interview to maximize the amount of knowledge the American people would get about him?
Or did he cover up?
After it's finished, we'll talk about it.
Well, let's get a little taste of it.
This is the beginning of the second.
Well, second one's on there now.
Yeah, so you can watch this now.
I want to bring it up here.
Just play a little, give our viewers a little taste here of the podcast of America.
I need for the second edition of our podcast on the Nick Fuentes Tucker Carlson interview that's become so controversial.
But really, it's about and how do we deal with him?
What's the truth about him?
The first edition, the first chapter, which has been out now for a day or two, covered a number of his comments in which he displayed a hatred of the Jewish people, a total contorted view of the Second World War, of the Holocaust.
He proclaimed that Hitler was a good man.
Things that would astound you.
We uncovered the basis for some of this being the discredited anti-semi David Irving, who he cites as a great historian, who wasn't a professional historian at all.
He wrote a couple of books that were reasonably okay.
And then he went off like crazy, denying that there were concentration camps, denying that people died in concentration camps, and talking about how Hitler united Europe and gave a bunch of narratives, which I think you heard in the first clip at the Fit and Fresh podcast that Fuentes participated in.
You might as well listen to how the Second World War is viewed by distorted, perverted minds.
So let's listen to more of the Fit and Fresh podcast, which is featuring Herr Fuentes.
That's all I'm saying.
And so, and then you get into the war, and that's a whole other topic, but Hitler brings back the German economy.
And Germany was like raped basically after World War I.
I don't mean to use that in an insensitive way, but they were really screwed.
I mean, they got blamed for the war.
They had this huge debt.
Their country was destroyed.
And it was all because Germany, unified in the late 19th century, became a great industrial power.
Hitler comes back and says, we're going to strengthen the currency, rebuild the economy, get total employment.
We're going to bring back these ethnic German-speaking parts of Germany that were cut off after World War I in Czech Republic, in Austria.
He's the most popular leader in the world, Times Man of the Year.
Everybody loves him.
Well, then the British and the French declare war on him for trying to take Danzig, which is all German speakers.
Hitler goes in there and says, look, all I wanted was Danzig.
Let's have peace with Poland.
Britain and France declare war.
So Hitler goes in, destroys the British army, but lets most of them escape at Dunkirk.
He says, look, let's have peace.
The war is over.
The British say nope and start bombing Germany, which is illegal.
They start bombing German cities first because they knew that Germany would respond.
Hitler says, Look, stop bombing my cities.
is illegal
summarize it for you for a second really quick England and France declared war on Germany because he took Danzig and he offered to stop.
He got to back that up about a couple of years because he leaves out a couple of things.
He leaves out his march through Europe.
He leaves out Kristallnacht when he went around killing Jews and all of his opponents to take over, help take over.
He leaves out taking the Sudan land.
He leaves out taking Austria.
Did you ever watch Sound of Music?
Do you remember their escaping from the Nazis?
That's before France declared war on him.
What a dirty little liar.
Then he took Czechoslovakia.
He didn't mention that, did he?
And then they had a meeting, a very famous meeting called Munich that every half-wit that went to high school used to know.
He doesn't seem to know about Munich.
In Munich, Hitler declared that if he could keep all this here stuff, the war's over.
Chamberlain agreed with him, even though Winston Churchill, who he hates, by the way, Winston Churchill says, don't trust him.
And Chamberlain comes back and makes one of the worst statements in Western history.
He says, we will now have peace in our times.
Having gotten the signature of Adolf Hitler on a piece of paper.
And within a short period of time, yeah, he hits Danzig, but he doesn't stop in Danzig and say, gee, can I go?
He goes into Poland and just takes it in violation of what he had agreed to now for the second time and lied about.
And that's when England and France declare war.
Because at this point, he controls virtually all of Europe.
All that's left is the eastern part of Europe, which he eventually turns on his ally, Stalin, and invades Russia.
And yeah, Dunkirk, Dunkirk, the English have to escape from Dunkirk using every boat imaginable that they could find anywhere.
And there is a question as to whether Hitler let them escape or didn't have the capacity at that point to wipe them out and thought they were so beaten anyway, it wouldn't matter.
And his attention had now turned to the Soviet Union.
But that might be the only thing that has a partial degree of historical accuracy.
Let me stretch it out just a little bit more.
One of the reasons why people feel that way is they thought that Hitler always thought he could have a treaty with England.
There were a lot of Nazi sympathizers in the United Kingdom, including the former king who abdicated and a whole group of English noblemen who happened to be afflicted by the disease that he has called anti-Semitism.
It wasn't just Germany that was anti-Semitic.
In fact, the reality is up until then, Germany may not have been the biggest anti-Semitic country in Europe.
And one that any number of really great scholars have always said, if they had a predict, they would have predicted somewhere else that this would have broken out.
But those countries didn't have an instigator of great, great skill called Adolf Hitler.
Well, he goes on to tell you what a great guy Hitler was.
He also, just out of nowhere, says that he equally loves Joseph Stalin.
This is a monster.
Because he's, I don't know.
I mean, maybe he's saying these things just to get ratings.
But to be one of the few people in the Western world who's carrying a flag for one of the great all-time murderers.
Either one, Stalin or Hitler.
I mean, man, you're willing to sell anything in order to get a couple of views on the internet.
It can't be any soul left.
And the worst thing is, aren't we going through a terrible time of anti-Semitism now?
Do we really need this right now?
Could this lead to even worse violence?
I mean, he loves a man who was dedicated purely to violence, two of them.
Why isn't he?
Why doesn't he find that so repulsive that he couldn't support them?
So I do a real examination of them so that when we have this debate, we don't create some kind of moral equivalency like they did between Gaza, Hamas, Palestinian Authority, and Israel.
There is no moral equivalency between those.
Israel is a state.
It's a state with, yes, with issues and problems, but it's a great, great liberal democracy or liberal republic, however you want to look at it.
It has two million Palestinians living there safely.
The idea of genocide, which he promotes, and so does Tucker, genocide of the Palestinian people, is absurd.
There are two million Palestinians living in Israel.
Nobody's killing them.
Nobody's killing the non-Hamas Palestinians as best they can.
Who's putting the people in front of them?
Not the Israelis.
Now, are they trying to wipe out the people who for 50 years or more have been dedicated from the time they're two years old to killing them and pray about killing them every Friday and end their prayer with death to Israel, death to the Jews?
Who, when Hitler was around, teamed up with him for the final solution?
Well, of course they are.
So this, What I try to do with this podcast, as I give it my podcast back in 2020 and 2021, 2022, I try to prove it to you rather than just tell you so you can listen to the words like you just did there and make your own determination.
And about both about him and to some extent, in the case of Tucker, not the same thing, but what was he doing with that podcast?
Was he questioning him in a way that would be in the best interest of the American people?
Or was he questioning him for some other reason?
Oh, you make up your mind.
There are three episodes.
Two are out.
They're all about, this last one is 40 minutes.
Yeah, we're just about done with it.
I think we could get that.
One's about 50 and one's about 40.
And they're very compelling.
I don't think you're going to find them in the least bit boring.
You may find them frightening.
And I really am interested in your views on them because we want to do a lot more of these.
I think this is important.
This is important for us to get ourselves out of this brainwashing of the American people, to give a critical mass of our American people the knowledge, the critical thinking and the knowledge to see through these things and debate them properly.
We can do some of it with the show like this, but we don't have the time to really calm down.
Look at the facts.
Let's get the record out.
Okay.
Well, thank you.
Pray for the people of Israel and pray for the people of Ukraine and pray for the people of Iran.
Of course, pray for us and our president, our great president, and all the things that he's accomplishing, which are almost beyond belief.
So let's keep giving him the strength.
See you tomorrow night.
And now you're going to go over right now and you're going to go see Dr. Maria, who's got a great show, an absolutely great show.
She also covers the president's roundtable.
Actually, more than we do.
More than we do.
So you get a chance to see how the president performed today, who is not only one of the great presidents, but one of the great American entertainers.
God bless America.
It's our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
It was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world, the greatest democracy, the freest country, a country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.