All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 2, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
55:50
The Rudy Giuliani Show: Monday, November 24, 2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and we are in Palm Beach, and this is the Rudy Giuliani show.
And we are waiting.
Are we going to have some film from the tree lighting?
We will.
We got to upload it.
Okay.
But there are pictures of the Christmas tree.
I don't know that it's taken place yet, but there was a tree lighting ceremony about four blocks from here at Worth Avenue.
It's a very, very minor version of the tree lighting that will take place when?
Next day or two, I would imagine.
Cut eight.
We have a picture of the White House Christmas tree.
At 30 Rock.
That's the White House Christmas tree, right?
Yeah.
That's the one selected by Mrs. Trump.
It is quite beautiful.
I'm exactly not sure where that is, where they actually put it, which room they put that in.
I don't remember.
But I don't know which one to start with because they're really, both of these stories, both of these stories are getting a lot of attention.
One, I think, is a real example of how Democrats are just not on our side.
They're on somebody else's side.
So let's start with that, with Venezuela and the gunboat.
Is that okay, Ted?
I was going to start with Walsey Palsy, but we'll start with Tampon Tim.
But why throw everyone off?
Let's start off with good old Tampon.
Tampon Tim is in a heap of trouble.
He's in a heap of trouble because we don't know if he's involved in getting any of this money.
Let's begin with that, because I'm not going to make any allegation like that unless I have some proof of it.
And frankly, I haven't seen any even suggestion of that.
Although it has to occur to you, if this much money is being stolen from the government, which is in essence what's being done by these Somalians, Maybe someone would say he's too stupid to share.
They're making a fool out of him.
But I mean, the reality is that this is, I have a very hard time believing the amount of money involved.
They diverted $1 billion, Ted.
That's over.
Now they're saying $6 billion.
Well, I think that's another fraud.
Yeah.
That's a different fraud.
Oh, that's a whole different.
That's a whole different fraud in Minnesota.
Yeah, exactly right.
There is another, there's another $6 billion that went to another.
$6 million.
I don't know.
How could that be called not-for-profit?
Some of all-for-profits.
I mean, I think all of these, if you see a democratic program, social program, and you see a not-for-profit in it, I'm going to be very, very conservative and careful.
You've got a better than 50-50 chance that it's crooked.
That's what it's there for.
Now, if you add to it any kind of emergency contract, like now, that emergency contract thing sounds good.
It's an emergency contract, no bidding.
So you go pick, you go pick the top Somalian crook you can find and who got all the Somalians in illegally, and you get the money toward them.
And then they're going to organize the whole vote for you.
And the whole thing is all beautifully set up.
Little Mogadishu, which is a section of, would you believe this, of Minneapolis, is the most dangerous part of Minneapolis.
So they're really big contributors to the well-being.
Now, of course, is it every Somalian?
Of course, it's not every Somalian.
But is it a significant enough number to help destroy to a certain extent the city?
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, Minnesota was not a dangerous city.
It now probably has, I'm not sure of this, but it probably has a murder rate more than New York.
And if it doesn't, it's damn close.
And this is because they have a governor who, the best thing you could say about him is he's a complete, absolute blithering idiot.
But that's not all he is.
He is without any doubt a guy who has a background that should never have been picked for being vice president of the United States.
It's yet another example of how completely idiotic the top of the ticket was: Camel Harris, who wouldn't be capable of picking somebody to help her walk across the street.
So this is just one more of many, many examples of what open border does and how it ruins a country.
The amount of money involved in this, the destruction of the city of Minneapolis, the money that is taken from the state of Minnesota, we don't even know yet.
And the governor, who is the best thing you can say about him on this issue, is he was completely asleep at the switch, had no realistic idea of how to account for money, which makes him a Democrat, a typical Democrat.
But there's something else about him that should not go uninvestigated because it's more important than this.
He gives every indication, and since no one ever questions about it, one would have to begin with: it appears as if he is an operative of the Chinese communist government.
When he left college as a young man, he went into a program that was organized by Harvard Law School to send you to China.
That program had a large number of people who have turned out to be anything but have turned out to be very big proponents of Red China.
I believe some of them have actually gone to jail.
He spent not just the summer there, he spent about a year or a year and a half in China being trained as a teacher.
He became very close to the headmaster.
He was in love with and was going to marry, I believe, the headmaster's daughter or another young woman involved with the school.
They were great, great lovers.
And then she wrote him this very pathetic letter that he jilted her and left her and he was very mean to her when he came back to the United States.
He came back to the United States in love with China.
And then for the next, it varies from 15 to 30 years.
So we'd have to get the exact number.
Originally, it was 30 years, and then someone tried to correct it to 15 years, and it's probably somewhere in the middle, because no one ever really investigated this properly.
Nor was he questioned about it.
It's remarkable that he got through an entire vice presidential election with this kind of a connection to our worst enemy in the world.
And he wasn't questioned about it.
It shows that our press is not only affected by communism, affected by anti-Americanism, affected by anti-Trumpism, even on the conservative side, they're just lazy as hell.
Well, what he did was he went to China, if not every year, almost every year.
They did say every year, but I've not gone and checked it.
And I don't know if anybody has checked it.
But his campaign said every year.
He went every year to China.
He taught in China every year.
And he brought students with him from the United States as part of that exchange program.
And the rough number was 50.
And he did this for at least 15 years, maybe as much as 30 years.
He also had two businesses that were involved in sending students to China.
Whether the two business just encompassed these 50 and his work and his wife's work, or it was broader than that, I don't know that.
But I do know that also operated for that extended period of time.
Let's just settle on 20 years.
Now, it would be impossible for him not to be a devoted communist and have been allowed to do that.
The Chinese communists, the red Chinese, are not going to allow some high school teacher from America to come over there 20 times and teach whatever the hell he wants, teach anything other than to propagandize for the Chinese government.
His statements that would sometimes inadvertently come through his stupid mind would occasionally suggest how much he loved China, like when he recommended China to help negotiate the problem in the Middle East.
In fact, I remember the words he used.
They have the moral suasion to do it.
That is, of course, an absurd, idiotic statement that could only come from a complete nut, jerk, idiot, or a communist, and more likely the second and a little of the first.
Statements constantly, every once in a while, in order to cover himself, he would criticize China, never harshly, never anything very important, not a peep out of him on the pandemic and China's role in it.
On the pandemic, he acted like he was Mao Zedong.
On the pandemic, he's the guy who limited people on the number of people you could have at your Thanksgiving and Christmas dinner during the pandemic.
And he very generously moved it up for Christmas.
I think he went from seven to nine, and he literally asked people to turn in their neighbors if they had more than 12, nine people at the Christmas dinner.
So you see there, you see there, and you see this in all of the Democrats, and this is the socialism communism that affects all of them.
Some of them knowingly, and that could be him, and some of them unknowingly, because they're all part of that circle and they're educated that way.
I said it right at the very beginning when they started putting down mandates.
I said, here comes the authoritarian socialism, which is part of all of them.
Cuomo, Murphy, him, your governor in Michigan.
You just go on and on.
Mr. Hollywood, I mean, all of them just enjoyed so much being authoritarians.
They also enjoyed so much having this emergency power.
So, I mean, the reason it was extended was so that they could have that emergency power as long as possible.
Governor Hochul in New York took terrible advantage of that and grabbed the 300, I don't remember, it might have been 300 million to a pack.
I'd have to go back and get you the details of that.
I think as this opens up, you're going to find that Minnesota is an absolutely thoroughly crooked Democratic state.
No different than New York.
I always had the impression of Minnesota as a kind of Midwestern, not squeaky clean state, but in terms of corruption, a clean state with a very silly, unrealistic, idiotic ideology from Ubit Airhead Humphrey to Mondale, to that group of people.
But I never thought of it as crooked as the East in older states and cities like New York and Illinois, which is of course Midwestern, and Boston and Philadelphia and these places are cesspools of Democratic corruption.
Well, it looks like Minneapolis, Minnesota is, and Walls is right there.
And what I am arguing for is that as we're going through this on Walls, the committee should examine his connections to the Chinese Communist Party because they have to exist.
He would never have been able to teach in China for 20 years without being favorably looked upon by the red Chinese.
Also, how much money did he get from them?
As long as we're looking at his finances, if we are, because I don't think we should just assume that this money was being stolen all around him.
If we're talking about $1 billion for this and $6 billion for that, and none of this money went to him, but who was paying for those businesses that he was running?
Did the students pay a tuition?
Did somebody pay for them to go there?
Was China paying him to bring people, young children, youngsters over there to condition them?
Now, for that, you should go to jail for a lot more than just running a crooked program.
And he should not be allowed to get away with it.
So, Venezuela and the boat.
So, the incident now, which was in September, is being reviewed.
I think it's September 2nd was the date of the incident, because this drug boat, this boat that was identified as carrying, I would imagine cocaine when you're talking about drugs from Venezuela.
And they hit it, and then part of it remained in the water and they hit it again.
And the real issue is: is that what they did, or did they hit the boat and then sometime after notice that there were two survivors hanging on to a piece of the boat and kill them deliberately?
And the position of the Department of War, so this is the position of the admiral who ordered it, and Hegset and anybody else in the chain of command was that it was a continuous action and that the order was to destroy the boat entirely so that if it took two shots or three shots, it would take two or three shots.
The idea was to eliminate all those drugs, let them go to the bottom of the ocean and don't have a quarter of them floating toward shore.
And that was the emphasis not on necessarily the people on the boat.
Now, can we take a look at the footage, Ted, and see, is there a way we can look at how long did this incident take place?
Yeah, well, we have we're still trying to find the second, the film where it shows the strike.
So, yeah, we'll have that momentarily here.
Let's see the first strike first.
Yeah.
So we want to show the, I'm sure we want to show that there's a specific date in question.
It's September 2nd.
September 2nd.
So just want to make sure we have the right strike here.
And it was an authorization from Pete Hakesett to Admiral Bradley.
Yep.
So we have a 20, about a 30-second clip here.
Let's watch that.
I'm loading it up right now.
8.7 here.
It'll be ready.
Momentarily, this is the first strike on September 2nd.
It's under, it's 8.7, Jason.
And this is a strike that's come under a lot of scrutiny in recent Days, really, they're accusing the Secretary of War of calling the second strike.
But the mayor wants to know.
So, we're going to play this here.
This video that you're about to see will show the, you know, see the first strike.
And then we'll let you decide if this is the second one.
We're also looking for longer footage to see if they have released the full too.
So, here's the initial strike, Mayor.
We have it up.
Let's see if you can see the second strike here.
That's one.
And I believe what they show here is the second right here.
You see that at the end?
Now, if that is the complete shot, that's what we don't know.
If that's the complete shot, then this is really extremely idiotic.
That's a continuous shot.
I mean, you can, they're destroying the boat.
They're not, they're not, it doesn't even seem that you can see two people surviving.
The idea is that this becomes some kind of act of war or murder because you hit the boat, you don't take out the whole boat, then there's a piece of the boat floating in the water, and you see two survivors, and you go kill them.
That would have to be the intent to make it something other than just a legitimate police action.
And that the first shot and the second shot were part of the same process.
The order was take the boat out.
Well, you hit it one time, you get three quarters of it, and you hit it a second time, you get the last quarter of it.
Now, why do Democrats pick on this as their big issue, right?
When the country has so many things like healthcare to solve and everything else, whose side are they on?
The Venezuelan drug dealers?
They're worried that some military made a mistake.
It doesn't make any sense.
These people are not up there to go just for no reason kill people.
I mean, how many of these happened under Obama when he was bombing terrorists, even American citizens?
These people didn't get a trial that Obama hit from the sky and killed.
The objection to that was that it was covered up a lot because those people would have made excellent rats and excellent informants.
They'd have been just the people that would have given you the information that you needed so that we weren't endlessly in that campaign, which he left actually for Trump to have to finish because he didn't know what the hell he was doing.
But he was just, I don't know how many he executed, but he executed dozens and dozens of people.
There was not a single that I can recall, a single humanitarian issue raised about, gee, did he give him a trial?
How did he know?
How did he know it was the right one?
And how did he, how do we really know we got the right person?
Just a bunch of lying intelligence people telling us that?
The 51 spies who lied telling us that?
Right.
I wish they'd released a full video.
We haven't seen that yet.
And to see the timing between the two.
Yeah, I mean, that's really the important thing: all we really have to know is how much time.
If we're talking about a three, four, five minute, within a three, four, five minute segment, then you have a destruction of the whole boat.
If we're talking about 20 minutes went by, and then they noticed a little piece of the boat, and they saw some people struggling, and boom, they hit it.
You got a little bit of a different story there.
And the question becomes, what's their authority to kill these drug dealers who are bringing illegal, deadly drugs into the United States?
And that's very, very, I mean, the defense day would be very, very hard.
But then the second strike, if it happens in any form of a continuous sequence, the second strike is the same as the first strike.
If the first strike is justified, the second one is.
The idea was to destroy the boat.
Sometimes it takes you two shots to destroy something, sometimes three or four.
But that's the order, and that's what you do.
so we'll take a short break and we'll be right back welcome to vocal the free speech social app that gives you a platform to amplify your voice speak freely connect boldly and be part of a growing movement for truth faith and freedom Want to know what's happening right now?
The now playing feature shows you exactly who's live and what's streaming in real time.
Check out the show's feed.
A non-stop lineup, including Lindell TV News 24-7, shows and on-demand programming all in one place.
Connect with your favorite host and never miss a show.
Explore the featured page for quick access to Lindell TV's top shows.
Follow your favorites and watch their newest content flow right into your feed.
And when they go live on Vocal, you can join the live chat and be part of the action.
Ask questions, share your thoughts, even help shape future shows.
Stay informed on issues around securing our elections by following your state's Cause of America account.
Join a group and connect on a deeper level from faith and freedom to the future of our nation.
Go to vocal.com or download the app today and be a part of the mission to save our country.
I'm excited to announce that we're having our biggest three-in-one sale ever with a limited edition product, a back-in-stock special, and a close-out deal you won't find anywhere else.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get our MyPillow bed sheets only $29.88.
Any color, any style, any size, even King's regular $119.98, only $29.88.
Once they're gone, they're gone for good.
How about our MyTowels?
They're finally back in stock, but not for long.
Get a six-piece MyTowel set, regular $69.98, now only $39.98.
And for the first time and the only time ever, get our limited edition premium MyPillows.
They're made with geyser cotton and designer gusset.
Queen, $17.98.
King's only $19.98.
So go to mypillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get the best offers ever.
Quantities are extremely limited, so order now.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today would be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with AirWaterhealing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love.
They require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats, don't wait to get your B3 from earwaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lindel for 20% off in savings and free shipping.
That's promo code Lindel at airwaterhealing.com.
Too many pharmacies and insurance companies are blocking the medications that actually work.
That's why I recommend All Family Pharmacy.
They give you access to treatments like ivermectin now, starting at just $2 a capsule.
They also have methylene blue, hydroxychloroquine, and so much more.
They're helping you stay prepared and they've dropped their prices by 25%.
Also, use promo code Lindel10 to save even more.
Go to allfamilypharmacy.com forward slash Lindel.
Use promo code LINDELL10 and get the medicine you need.
Welcome back to the Rudy Giuliani Show.
And as far as I can tell, the only thing that exists with regard to the boat attack is a nine-second clip that shows the initial attack.
Pete Hegset ordered or approved the second attack and then left and was informed an hour or so later that it was completed successfully.
What we don't know is the time interval between the completion of the first attack and then the second attack.
And really, in order to analyze this properly from the point of view of is this an issue with regard to a war crime or some kind of a crime or not, you really have to know that.
If it's a continuous action and the purpose of it is to take out the boat, which is what they're saying, then there's a very, very big exaggeration going on here.
If it's other than that, and it's more in the nature of sometime later and then the survivors were killed, then the authority for that becomes much more questionable.
So I think we have Allison, who is at the Capitol today, not at the White House.
Is that right, Allison?
Hi, Mr. Mayor.
Yes, I was at the Capitol.
Now I'm overlooking the beautiful swamp here.
But yes, I was in Congress today and I got sit in on a press conference this morning.
Mike Johnson and Republican leadership sort of highlighted, you know, where we go from here.
We're obviously about to go to Christmas break here in the very near future.
I can't believe it's almost Christmas time.
But they're talking about looking ahead, looking forward to January, what is on the agenda.
They even got into talking about the upcoming midterms that are just around the corner.
And they really just tried to highlight, you know, their accomplishments thus far.
They've, you know, been here for 11 months.
And yes, they have gotten some stuff done, but not as much as we would like, right?
Because we still don't have any legislation that secures our elections.
And I don't know how we can possibly think about the 2026 midterms when we still have yet to actually pass any election security measures.
Now, we do have the SAVE Act that has passed the House on two separate occasions, but for some reason it's sitting in the Senate with action still yet to be taken.
So I don't know what the Senate is doing about that.
I was dying to talk to Leader Thun today.
He unfortunately didn't call on me during his press conference, but I did have the opportunity to ask Speaker Johnson what is being done to actually pass these election security measures like single-day voting, hand-counted paper ballots.
Let's take a listen to what he had to say.
You talked a lot about your accomplishments, and one you didn't mention is the SAVE Act, which the House has passed twice.
It's still awaiting action in the Senate for some reason.
But many are still asking when an in-person, same-day hand-counted paper ballot measure will be passed, and will that be done in time for the 2026 election?
Yeah, I've been asking that myself.
I think that would be a really important measure to eliminate fraud in elections.
And there is some element of fraud in every election.
We all know that.
And we have a duty as lawmakers to prevent as much of that as is humanly possible.
The SAVE Act has been a big priority of ours.
I think I did mention it in a list, but it was so long.
I certainly intended to.
It's an important measure, and we would certainly love to get that signed into law.
We need a little help in the Senate, of course, to do that.
We don't have control over all elections.
The states in our system, as you know, have a lot of responsibility over that, and that is federalism.
We support that.
The states have that in their jurisdiction of authority.
We don't want to federalize all elections because that could open up a whole other can of worms.
But with regard to federal elections, at least, you know, elections for Congress and Senate, we do have some say.
And so the SAVE Act would be an effort to ensure that we eliminate as much fraud as possible.
I've obviously been a big champion.
I was a co-author of it before I became Speaker.
We've been working on this and we'll continue to try to get it done.
So it's a big problem.
Well, I'd like him very much.
Not really the answer we wanted to hear.
I mean, you know, he's urging the Senate to pass the SAVE Act, which, yes, is important.
But again, a SAVE Act only addresses the voter ID component of this.
And we need a multi-pronged measure attempt to really, you know, fully reform our elections here that, as we know, are so corrupt and there's so much cheating.
So I don't know how we move forward and we can look ahead to the 2026 midterms when there's literally nothing being done.
There's nothing in place to actually secure them.
And President Trump is talking a lot about this.
As we know, this is top on his priority list.
I think he's urging Congress to pass these election security measures.
He was talking about it just this morning.
He posted to True Social that in Dallas County, Texas, they're actually going to paper ballots and is now encouraging all Republicans to implement the same in their states.
So I know it's top of mind for him.
My question is: what the heck is Congress doing?
Why have they been there for 11 months and still not done anything to secure our elections?
It truly baffles the mind.
It does.
It does.
And it really isn't all that hard to do.
I mean, it's a pretty, you don't need a 400,000-page bill to do it.
You know, a couple of pages could do it.
And the reality is, I think I'm right about this.
I'd have to look at the polls, but I can't imagine the majority of Americans don't want a simpler voting system, one that isn't prone to fraud, like paper ballots.
I mean, France does an entire federal election on paper ballots and gets it counted by midnight.
So, I mean, there's no reason, and there's no reason why that can't be done.
You can cheat with paper ballots, but it's much harder and it's much easier to catch, and it's much easier to catch later.
I mean, it's much easier to find later and to verify later.
And it would really reduce the amount of cheating.
And also, I think, Allison, all these elections, I mean, this is not one election.
It's like all these separate elections.
There's much more opportunity for fraud than even in a presidential election.
I mean, we saw 2020 was an exception because of COVID, what they were able to get away with.
But without COVID, there's only a certain amount of cheating you can do because there's so much scrutiny in a federal election.
But these are all little elections in one state or another.
Who the hell knows what they're doing in Tennessee tonight, right?
Or today.
Exactly.
Exactly.
I know.
Who knows what If there are, you know, 500 Tennessees going on all at once.
Yeah, that's exactly right.
Now, I got to ask you a question, Allison.
I saw, I saw a, I saw a video and I put it on and it looked exactly like your inter, your interview, that cost uh uh, speaker policy, her career uh, I believe that was I.
I believe you should take credit for getting her retired, because once she dealt with you, that was it.
She no longer.
But all of a sudden she's not giving the same answers.
She's using all kinds of curse words.
She's answering instead of turning around and telling you to shut up.
I can't, I can't even tell you what she told you on this.
When I looked at it, when I looked at whether it was you or not, you know, at the end I couldn't tell whether it was it actually you or is it, or did they use somebody that looks like you?
Have you seen this?
I think you're referring to the artificial intelligence enhanced version of my video.
I can't find it again.
I'm looking for it on X and I can't find it.
It's very oh.
I'm sure to send it to you.
I have it bookmarked.
It's pretty hilarious, it's hilarious, it's hilarious.
But you know, the reason it was so funny for me was I thought it was the real one and then, all of a sudden, I started hearing her talk like this and I said, oh my god, I know it's amazing AI can do these days.
It sounds exactly like her, it sounds exactly like me.
You would never know the difference unless you know you were actually there to witness it, like I was.
So yes, it's very funny.
So that was not.
That was an artificial intelligence version of you and her.
Yes, someone put it through AI.
I think they programmed what they wanted it to say, which are really the questions that we all really want the answers to.
Right, I have not.
We can play it.
I don't want to.
We gotta find that there's a lot of cold.
We might need to bleep out some, some of the words in there, because I don't know if it was not you, not you.
You were a good girl, not you.
I was very professional.
All right, Allison's the best.
Good job, by the way.
I think that's a very important issue, that this is the time to be focusing on it.
Oh, and she's the best reporter on Capitol Hill by far.
I mean, we've seen the stories and the interviews she's gotten so far this year.
I mean she's she's, she's, oh well, looking forward, top notch.
Yeah yeah, there's plenty, there's plenty to go.
Wow, good job, Allison.
They keep me busy over there.
Thank you so much, you too.
She does really a great job.
Yeah, you know, she really does do a great job, but that I don't know if.
If you saw this tip, but it really you got to understand how it hit me.
I'm, i'm going through x right, and I see the Pelosi thing I said i'm sort of in the middle of it, so I go back to the beginning on x.
So when you go back to, you don't realize I didn't have the sound on.
I put the sound on, it starts off the same way.
And then all of a sudden she's telling her, oh, she sounds like the Nancy, you know, Nancy Dallessandra right, Nancy Dallessandro um, from the Dallasandro family in Baltimore.
They got it just right.
They got it just right, uh.
So I I did do another check and there is no public video that clearly shows the second strike.
There's only a?
Uh, there's only a short, 29 second clip that we have watched and um, no precise elapsed time.
Two strikes uh, a short video and um.
And then and then nothing about the second, nothing about the timing of the second of the second one.
And at this point, such a video, I guess, until it's declassified, would be classified.
Right.
So we'll have to watch that.
This either becomes a significant problem for the military or not, depending on that.
And I surely hope it isn't because if it was, I'm sure it was done accidentally.
Look, so accuse me of being a big supporter of our military.
That's the side I'm on.
I'm not on the side of drug dealers.
Of course, we have to comply with the rules, and I'm not going to ever sanction somebody not.
But I just hope it works all right.
It works out all right for Admiral Bradley and everybody on that boat and Pete.
And these are really good people and they're doing a great job for us.
And the president during the press conference made some reference or Caroline did to the reduction in the amount of drugs coming in, which is pretty significant.
Right.
And I remember this used to be my profession.
I was in charge of the narcotics division of the United States Attorney's Office.
I know a thing or two about this area.
In New York at the height of heroin and cocaine at the French Connection, during the French Connection era.
And when there's a real crackdown and there's a real shortage, you really have an impact.
Believe it or not, you've had an impact.
And I was not, I can't say I was equally involved in both sides of this, but I was very aware of the rehab side of it because my wife was a drug rehabilitation counselor when they were just beginning drug rehabilitation counseling, using group therapy as the main method of detoxing.
And I used to, I was very aware of those programs.
And I can remember when you put a limit on the supply, you begin pressuring the addicts.
Not all, obviously.
Some are so badly addicted, they can't be.
But when there's no drugs, there's no drugs.
They can steal all they want.
They have no place to buy it.
And that forces them to detox.
And the detox center has become overloaded.
You can get a sense of supply and demand from that.
And that's why when people say, oh, there'd be no drug problem if people, if we didn't have the demand here, this is our demand, and we're putting all the pressure on these other countries.
And all they're doing is satisfying the demand that we have.
And there is some reality to that, half.
The other half of it is supply.
If it wasn't available, you wouldn't have as many addicts.
And the more available you make it, the more addicts you have, which is the fallacy of legalizing it.
Because when you legalize it, your demand goes up dramatically as it has for marijuana in all the places in which that's occurred.
And the overdoses, we now have overdoses for marijuana.
And we have marijuana addiction.
We have marijuana use up two, three times since we've legalized it.
So it's a function of both.
It's a function of supply and demand.
You put pressure on both, you're going to get control over this problem.
But the minute you put pressure on the supply, there is a lot of pressure on the addicts and the users to seek alternatives.
And it drives a lot of people into some form of rehab.
And I would ask you to please keep an open mind about drug rehabilitation.
It works and it doesn't work.
Meaning, you can't make a general statement about it.
It's like treatment in general, right?
Some people are treated for cancer and they're cured.
Some people are treated for cancer and it's arrested for 25 years and it's almost effectively a cure.
And some people are treated for cancer and it doesn't do any good.
And there it's easier to pot because the disease either has advanced or it hasn't.
But the same thing is true here.
There are people that just need some support and they're going to come off the addiction or they need a relationship with God.
Probably the most helpful way of getting people off addiction is a relationship to God.
So let's see, let's see what happens here.
But whatever happens here, this is a very, very important effort.
There hasn't been a president as serious about this since Ronald Reagan.
And Ronald Reagan had a big impact on the amount of drugs.
I know I've ever made fun of the just say no program, but he increased the internal enforcement exponentially.
And through Nancy, he increased the amount of rehab programs that were available.
And it was an emphasis on both, and it did have an impact.
And it was really necessary because it had to deal with the shock of the crack introduction.
Before 1982 33, there was no such thing as crack.
And crack exploded the drug situation.
It exploded.
This is impossible for me to tell you and understand it.
There are, it is reported in the New York Post today, probably on the front page, if I recall correctly, that there are close to 7,000 known illegal criminal migrants in New York that have not been, where they have not notified the federal authorities.
And many of them are walking the streets.
And the federal government has now organized it.
And they haven't gone through the whole list of it, but these are like 29 homicides and thousands of assaults and hundreds of robberies, burglaries, drug offenses, sexual offenses.
And they're all being withheld by Tricia James, the attorney general, who this is what she's about prosecuted for.
This is a straight out and out obstruction of federal law.
Here are some of the, let me see if I have, if you want to, if you want to put that on, I can probably get you some pictures of these lovely.
I don't really know if you want to see pictures of these guys.
I don't know if you want to see pictures of these guys.
Let me see if I have pictures of these guys.
No, I don't have pictures of them, thank goodness.
Saving us all.
But here they are.
Vashrezvav Danislovich Kim.
That's a hell of a name, right?
I wonder what they call him.
Kim 24 is a resident of Uzbekistan.
What are these people doing here?
From Uzbekistan.
He was arrested by the New York State police for charges including use of a child under 17 years of age in a sexual performance, whatever that means, rape in the second degree, and patronizing a person less than 15 years of age for prostitution in the second degree.
This is a real pervert, right?
I mean, we don't have enough perverts in this country.
We got to get him from Uzbekistan.
In February 2013, Kim was convicted and sentenced to time served and five years probation.
Albany County and New York probation refused to assist ICE in locating and arresting him.
The agency finally arrested him and deported him.
And they had to go find him on their own.
Stephen Daniel Enriquez Galicia, he's Dominican.
He entered the United States in 2016.
He was arrested in the Bronx last year for attempted murder, attempted assault, reckless endangerment, criminal possession.
He was turned loose despite an ICE detainer.
An ICE detainer means ICE had put in a warrant, basically, saying if he's going to be released, turn him over to us because he's wanted for violations of federal law.
There is New York State and New York City have laws that say you cannot cooperate with the federal government.
How that is not illegal, I do not know.
How that is not criminally illegal, I do not know.
It seems to me that's harboring a criminal.
During an altercation in the lobby of a residential building, he pulled a gun and fired at least one shot in the direction of a man or woman, who Cops said had to duck and cover to avoid being hit.
He was taken into ICE custody on September 20th, finally, where he remains.
There are a couple of others.
This guy is a Crips gang member who's been let out any number of times.
And he was roaming the streets of the Bronx until September 11th, when ICE arrested him without any help from the New York Police Department.
And then Joseph David Hernandez Hernandez, he's from Honduras.
So we have a guy, a Crips member, a guy from the Dominican Republic, a guy from Uzbekistan, a guy from Honduras.
He ended in an unknown time and place.
In other words, he's one of those, we don't know who you are, of which there are probably millions.
He was arrested on charges of rape, strangulation, and assault on September 25, only to be set free despite an ICE detainer ordering that he be turned over.
On October 6th, ICE busted him in the Bronx.
In other words, we have a guy, we arrest him.
He is charged with rape, strangulation, and assault.
Because the criminal justice system in New York belongs to the criminal and has nothing to do with the protection of the public.
Hernando's Hernandez was released, and I just had to go search him down without any help from the city of New York.
This is what's going on under Adams.
Can you imagine what's going to go on under the communists who agrees with this?
That is insane.
That should have been challenged right from the very beginning.
The first person who did that should have been put in jail.
The first person who took Sanctuary City from the point of view of doing humane things with the approval of the federal government and turned it into something that's antagonistic to federal law should have been prosecuted for obstruction of federal law.
And it would have done wonders.
We're going to cover two people who went to court today, but I don't think we have the time left to do it here.
And it's two interesting cases.
One is the shooter in the Islamic extremist shooter in Washington, D.C. Lack and Wall.
Yeah, and the other is Mangioni.
Yeah, what a weird phenomenon that is.
I mean, more than anything else, that has to just frighten the hell out of you as to the society you live in.
I mean, who are these freaks that are?
I look at some of them.
Celebrate the freaks.
I mean, these are freaky looking people that are out there.
Well, that's the Islamic terrorist.
And there's the heartthrob.
I mean, he looks weird.
Yeah, I don't get the.
I don't get it either, but I'm not a girl, you know.
It's also a good point.
But have you seen some of these freaky?
There is one.
Hold it.
Want to see one?
Sure.
There's one right there.
Yeah, I'll put that up.
Look at that.
Look at that.
Nut.
Look at that.
Hold on a second.
Give Luigi a laptop.
Oh, we got the light in the way there.
I guess that one right there.
We'll have to do something with it.
I mean, it's really important that we see.
Who does that?
I don't know.
I mean, and she's got Super Mario there, you know, down by her.
You know what?
Imagine staying out in the cold doing that for a murder, a cold-blooded murder.
I mean, it just doesn't make any sense, right?
But that's the society we live in now.
It's really crazy.
So we thank you very much for listening into the Rudy Giuliani show.
We're going to move over to X very, very shortly.
And we're going to take a really, a really good look at the Tennessee election and what's going on there.
And we're going to tell you about the podcast, the new edition of the podcast.
It goes into further detail on what was said during the Tucker Carlson Nick Fuentes interview and how serious is it?
Is it just an alternative political view?
Or is it the kind of evil that emerged in Nazi Germany at an early stage?
And is it something that should be wiped out before it goes any further?
I think if you pay attention to these podcasts, of which there are now two and there'll be a third, and you spend some time analyzing it, you and I together will be able to reach a decision about it.
We'll talk about it on X now that we're our time is up on Lindell TV.
We'll be back tomorrow night at 7.
We want to thank you for listening, and we want to ask you all to pray for the United States of America and for the President and for all those who are under difficult circumstances right now of war.
▲
Export Selection