All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 4, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
56:39
The Rudy Giuliani Show: Thursday, September 4, 2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening, this is Rudy Giuliani, and this is the Rudy Giuliani show, and it's uh you know what it's on.
It's uh Mr. Pillow's TV.
Don't you miss him?
What are we gonna have him on as a guest?
What do you have Mike on as a guest?
We gotta get him on.
I'm gonna text him now.
We gotta get Mike on as a guest.
Since it since his uh trial is over, he's been he's been kind of laying low.
I think he's I think he's uh but what would you be doing if you weren't licking your wounds if you were enjoying your victory?
What would you say you're you'd be doing?
If you were losing if you lost, you'd be licking your wounds.
But if you win, you're sucking in the glory, I guess.
Well, today uh I was uh very, very impressed uh both uh with the individual subject, but with the whole picture of what this Trump administration is all about and what they're fighting.
And in a way, I thought Robert uh Kennedy Jr. embodied it.
He'd embodied um the battle that they're all going through in one way or another.
Uh whether it's Pete Hages or it's Pam Bondi, or it's uh uh uh Marco, or it's the president himself who doesn't have to deal with the Congress, but you know, has to deal with the press and um and maybe maybe the Democrats uh are uh well they're always nasty, right?
Maybe they're unduly nasty because uh Bobby was a former uh de uh Democrat.
Uh and I I uh maybe I don't get it as much, because I'm a former Democrat and I I changed for very different reasons because the reasons that I changed for were years ago, and the reasons he changed for now.
Um maybe some of it's the same.
I mean, mine my was pretty evenly divided between foreign policy and domestic policy.
It was in uh 1970.
Uh it was I I was a supporter of his uh uncle and his father, a very big supporter of both.
Um but I was a very, very strong uh, even though as a young even though as a young man, you wouldn't think this would be a big issue for him, but I was a very strong anti-communist.
And uh you might not know this, but the Kennedys were very strong anti-communists.
His father actually had been a uh uh counsel on uh uh the McCarthy committee that got into trouble for going too far uh in going after the communists.
He was he was gone by then, but um but always throughout their career there was a real very, very realistic appreciation of the danger of communist communism, which the Democrat Party didn't have in general, except for the Kennedys and their group of supporters.
And once uh once uh and once Robert was gone, died, it really wasn't fair.
Teddy wasn't really uh, I guess of that generation, he wasn't involved with the Army McCarthy hearings and maybe as involved with the grandfather who was a very big anti-communist, and but whatever.
That that it ch the orientation changed, uh, but mine didn't.
And I I saw the uh Democrat Party when it nominated McGovern and who was so soft on dealing with the Soviets that we just never win this battle against the Soviets by appeasing them all the time.
And then I was a uh pretty strong um social liberal, but then when I began investigating as a prosecutor, the Model Cities administration and some of their other uh big great society programs, which which were you know Lyndon Johnson, maybe I overreacted, maybe I didn't.
They seemed all crooked.
It seemed to me like no money was getting the poor people.
And I said to myself, what am I doing in this party?
So I became an independent, and then eventually a Republican, which was back when Reagan uh was there, and then of course I've been a Republican all this time.
Uh, but always able until recently to get along with Democrats really well.
I mean, I got elected maybe with more Democrat votes than Republican votes in New York City.
I worked very, very well with the Democratic uh City Council, um, and I work with President Clinton.
Uh but to see their bitterness and silliness.
I mean, they know they know that the pharmaceutical industry is crooked.
Of course, they all get a lot of money from it, but they know that the pharmaceutical industry some time ago lost uh the uh desire to help and save people and became uh just another uh uh uh abbreviation on the stock market.
And and it's a question of, you know, uh are you uh is your stock price better today than it was yesterday?
And is the CEO keeping the stock price up?
And how do you recover all that money that it takes to do research on drugs?
Uh and how do you make sure that the drugs make a lot of money, whether they're helping people or killing people, how do you cover up uh things that go wrong in trials?
Uh it's it's about as crooked an industry as we have in terms of crooked industries.
Uh you might compare it to the to the defense industry, uh military industrial complex, the pharmaceutical complex, uh, with the uh onset of Medicare, Medicaid, and then eventually uh uh Obama, Obamacare, right?
Uh the paperwork and the reimbursements are um well, some of the reimbursements are so low uh that and and the structure for reimbursement so burdensome and costly, therefore, that the doctrine is probably uh justify, rationalize cheating.
Like if you don't really need that test, we'll give it to you because you can get reimbursed for that, but maybe not for the one that you actually are gonna do.
Or if you can ratchet up the number of uh patients that are that are uh uh doing things that bring you a profit that that's good too.
And eventually then all becomes money.
And I I believe uh that that the pandemic was all about money, uh as well as uh uh you know beating Trump.
Uh but maybe we we have we have a few of the excerpts, and this is better uh listening to some of the excerpts than it is listening to me, because they embody the debate That's going on right now within healthcare, but they embody really the debate between reformation and the deep state.
And the senators, by and large, are complete captives of the lobbyists who take them out to dinner, raise money for them.
There's no money on the side of patients.
There's a lot of money on the side of Pfizer.
And you're going to see that even with the Republican senators who are a little more restrained, but the pharmaceutical industry is putting out enormous amounts of money for both sides of the aisle.
And it's very fortunate that we have a guy like Kennedy who doesn't give a damn like the president doesn't.
So do you have a few?
We have a couple of uh excerpts we can play, Ted.
So you're saying the Biden administration politicize all the data?
Go back to what can't well just fire Dr. Trump Surgeon General.
They fired Dr. Grant, they fired all the people who question the orthodoxy.
They quite fired Dr. Gruber, Dr. Cow enacting an agenda that I think is fundamentally cruel and defies common sense.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Do I got a reply?
Senator, you've sat in that chair for how long?
20, 25 years while the chronic disease and our children went up to 76%.
And you said nothing.
You never asked the question why it's happening.
Why is this happening?
Today, for the first time in 20 years, we've learned that infant mortality has increased in our country.
It's not because I came in here.
It's because of what happened during the Biden administration that we're gonna end.
I'm gonna let Senator Wyden respond briefly to that.
I'm willing to give you the answer.
Secretary, someone should have asked you, maybe President Trump should have asked you, are you a trustworthy person?
And we should have waited for an answer then.
Let's not know what you're talking about.
You're talking gibberish.
Mr. Secretary, let me speak slowly and clearly so that you can understand me through my own.
And then give me a chance to do that.
Does this help?
Can you understand me?
Yes.
Appreciate that.
Mr. Secretary, yes or no.
Did you hire Mr. Nasty Prick, huh?
Uh really.
I don't know who he is, which Senator.
I mean, there are so many of them there, they they uh crawl around all over the place.
Where is he from?
New Mexico.
New Mexico.
And is he elected or uh uh did did he somehow just come in that day?
Yeah.
Was he elected?
Elected, yeah.
And uh what does he do?
Ask questions, just ask questions.
Well, like most of them.
Does he have any expertise?
I mean he there was one uh uh uh good there's one doctor who summed it all up for him, and he didn't really have to uh uh shall we shall uh do we have an excerpt from Senator Marshall?
Yeah, we'll get one.
Uh Senator Marshall did a very, very good job of summing it all up.
Senator Marshall uh said uh during one of these interviews, I don't know, I don't think it was during during during the uh hearing, but during an interview, that before he became a doctor, he delivered a baby a day.
So I think he knows a little something about uh medicine.
Um he was trying to uh he was trying to explain that Bobby Kennedy raises an issue that probably should have been raised 30 years ago.
Uh uh little babies do not need 60 vaccines.
They don't need 60 vaccines.
I think it's 57 that are uh mandated in New York.
Other states have different numbers, some more than that.
Like uh, for example, and I I remember my uh kids, uh Andrew and Z bringing this to my attention, and and I I mean I had lost track of vaccines, and I got a couple, and my children got a couple, and they showed me this list until she's five of something like 35 or 40 vaccines that are either recommended or required or whatever they are.
And uh, how about hepatitis as an infant?
Absolutely no reason for a hepatitis unless you know the kid's gonna go out and uh start dating it at two months and making out in the back of a car.
And as long as mama and daddy are uh in good shape and healthy, it's a useless vaccine.
And every vaccine has a certain percentage of uh side effects.
I mean, almost every vaccine or medicine can kill you, one out of a million, one out of this.
There's never a reason to take medicine if you don't need it.
Because medicine is always can always be counterproductive.
There's also a problem with vaccines.
I this went on so fast, I'm not sure I got the numbers correct.
But of that 50 or 60 number of vaccines that are required for your child, I thought I heard only one of them actually went through uh the requisite uh uh tests that you would have for a regular medicine.
I hope it's a little more than that.
I know it's not all of them.
The reason that I originally resisted taking the COVID vaccine, and to this day cannot understand how these lying, greedy, creepy Democrats fight so hard for it is.
It was never tested.
Never ever tested.
And we have a clip from Senator Roger Marshall.
Go ahead.
Welcome, Mr. Secretary.
One of your themes for the CDC is is transparency.
And I think when I hear you talk about transparency, I think part of that is sharing what you know, what the CDC knows with parents so that they can make decisions.
Behind me, yeah, I know it's gonna be hard to see from there, I can barely read it.
This is the current CDC recommendations for vaccines for children.
On day number one, uh they get their first jab, a hepatitis vaccine.
By the time they're 18 months, they've had 18 jabs.
By the time they get to be able to vote, they have 76 jabs.
Now that's a doctor saying it.
What did he say?
By the time they're at 10 years old, they have 76 jabs?
Yep.
I mean, that's that's more than there are genders.
And we don't need one, too.
That's right.
That's absurd.
Now, can I point out the profit motive in that?
I don't I don't need to know anything else other than uh all of those uh uh vaccines, if they can get a get on a list, or you guaranteed payment to the company.
You don't have guaranteed payment for everything.
I don't know if you have insurance or Medicare, Medicaid, whatever.
Certain medicines have to be approved, right?
By the insurance company, that the insurance company will pay for the medicine.
Not all medicines are approved, every vaccine is at 76 qingjings for the uh for the insurance company.
Multiply by the number of children born in America, ching ching ching changes.
Required.
Absolute cash comes right in.
Don't have to worry about collecting.
Boom, boom, payment, payment, payment.
Uh vaccines are uh just absolute cash machines.
That's why they that that's the whole problem with the pan the pandemic.
The reason that they beat down hydroxychloroquine, ivomectin, and everything else that did have a salutary effect on the illness at an early stage was because if there was a treatment for COVID,
then the you would not have been able to get the uh you would not be able to get the vaccine out on an emergency basis because you can only do it on an emergency basis if there isn't a known treatment.
So Dr. Fauci changed his position on hydroxychloroquine, about which he had written an article four years earlier that it was a miracle drug for dealing with viral with viral infections, particularly if done at an early stage, and basically frightened you into thinking it would kill you if you had it.
It was probably one of the most disgusting, dishonorable, lying, creepy things anyone ever did.
And I took the time to read about his, I took time to read his article.
Most people didn't bother to do that.
The press, the press hit it.
And the social media made it hard to find, but I found it.
And he was, he was over the top about hydroxychloroquine.
And then all of a sudden it's a terrible medicine.
And then I became completely suspicious when they said it could even be fatal.
This is of course ridiculous.
Most people have been taking it for 50 years for malaria as a prophylactic.
I took it for malaria.
So I see now, I mean, some of these senators like Barrasso and I don't get it.
I mean, they must be getting a lot of money from the, from the, from the vaccine industry.
They're so interested in all these vaccines.
Just the mere fact that they they score 72 jabs.
They should have been shocked.
They should have been shocked.
72?
And you can't figure out why.
And you got a guy that's willing to ask the question.
He's, I mean, he's sufficiently free from the corruption of this, so he's willing to ask the question, and you do everything he can to ruin them.
Thank God for the president, and thank God for him.
And uh maybe we'll we'll we'll we'll get to the bottom of which ones do we need and which ones don't we need.
How many of the 72 do we really need?
And does everybody need them?
I mean, very rarely does everybody need the same medicine, but we'll we'll have we'll have to see.
Well, Z's parade yesterday was quite uh quite a um quite a thing, uh quite a parade, right?
And um it was uh not uh like the usual uh they have one like on May 1st for to celebrate um uh I guess it celebrates um communism, the the the the establishment of communism in in the Soviet Union.
They call it the May Day Parade.
They used to have one in America when the Communist Party was active in America, then they all became Democrats and they don't need it.
Now you can look at that and you can see they're fascists.
You can see they're fascist just by the way they march.
They march like over-regimented, uh completely controlled automatons.
Uh the Russians, uh, the Chinese, the Nazis, the Nazis, of course, were the socialist party.
Uh they just they just turned their uh they just turned their uh political focus in a somewhat different direction.
There's their there's the um there's the little toy soldiers all marching.
Now they have actually uh pretty much marched for 50 years and not fought, which uh might raise a real question as to how effective they're gonna be as a fighting as a fighting force.
Uh you you can see a very militaristic country.
They desire to be the to be the leading country in the world by mid-century.
Um I would say that that march there had um had several targets.
Number one, Donald Trump.
Number two allies of the United States and trying to give them second second thoughts about just how far they should go as allies of the United States United States.
And number three, their own egos as dictators.
So he he he number one he gave us the benefit of seeing their military arms.
And number two, he gave us the benefit of seeing his main allies like Hitler.
He brought together, he brought together the major, the major dictators and murderers in the world.
Here we are.
You want to put the picture up, Ted?
And there they are, the uh the three the three demons Putin.
I don't know if they if they did the picture to make him, I mean, the Chinese will do anything to uh list the cult of Xi Jinming.
Did you notice how much bigger Xi Jinming looks in that picture than Putin and even Fat Boy?
And look at Fat Fat Boy looks like he doesn't even know where he is.
He's looking at, he's looking at uh Xi Jinming, so Zeke can tell him how to like Biden, which way do I go?
How should I go?
Do you want me to throw a bomb for you?
Would you like me to bomb someone?
I will.
They did parade out their nuclear triad, which they had never done before.
I mean, they went all out to really, really shake us up.
And um the first time they had put out uh nuclear uh um people don't, I don't know if the Russians put out their nuclear uh uh you know vert uh versions or examples of their nuclear weapons.
I I don't remember a country parading out replicas or actual uh parts of their nuclear weaponry, but but they but they but they did.
And the president was very, very impressed and therefore uh did did say he was watching it, and I thought his response was perfect to just slap him in their fat communist pusses, which was please give my warmest regard to Vladimir Putin and Kim Young-un.
He wrote this to Azijin Ming uh as you conspire against the United States.
So he let him know that he's looking at him.
And uh, and believe me, you see what you saw there?
It's nothing compared to what we have.
Now, if you want to go back and look at the picture, I have a thought about this, Ted.
I have a I have a feeling this picture of the three demons.
I think this picture was doctored to make Xi Jinming look bigger.
Notice how he dominates the picture.
I don't know that he's that I think he's uh Putin's short, so I don't know if he's that much, but I don't think he's that much taller than the fat boy.
And um, but doesn't he look like the father figure?
The the all of that is very well thought out.
I'm sure it was doctored to look that way.
Um he looks like the the he definitely looks like the guy in charge, right?
The way they the way they do that, the way they do that picture.
Uh according according to uh one of the editorials, this is either the post or the or the uh now uh Wall Street uh left-wing journal that said uh that um America's adversaries are united while Mr. Trump hits U.S. allies with a tariff barrage.
Now are they really that dumb or have such short memories that they don't remember the the uh massive meeting that Trump had at the White House where all the all of our allies came to him.
Uh I mean sure we're sure we disagree on tariffs.
Russia and and and um Russia and China and North Korea disagree on trade.
They have some very, very big disagreements on trade, even on territory.
Uh but where it comes to uh defense, it's quite obvious that we're all together.
I mean, they came to him for leadership on what to do about uh Ukraine.
And they're hanging on us every word.
So I I just think the Wall Street Journal has to paint everything you know negative uh to Trump.
If anything, he has brought the uh the NATO closer together than it's been in a very, very long time.
And he's actually gotten it to become effective, which is for their good, not just ours.
And it's real, it's not made up like their like their prop like their proper like their propaganda.
But that was the purpose of the whole of the whole parade.
We got to see some of their equipment.
We got to see their uh missiles, their DF uh 5-7 intercontinental ballistic missile, uh their uh their new versions of their aerial drones, which of course have become so important, their J-15 carrier-based fighter, their anti-drone air defense systems.
All this is of some value.
The J-35A stealth uh uh fighter, which uh theoretically is supposed to match the F-35, and it doesn't.
Um, and their pilots uh would not would not in any way match ours, nor do they have the experience that ours do.
Now, the the the Wall Street Journal did leave out, however, somebody missing from this great show of unity, and that's somebody who was there for an earlier part of the meeting.
And that is the president of India.
Critical uh that he's not there because uh the theory was they were kind of stealing him away uh from us.
Don't see it.
Don't see how that's gonna happen, and he sure as heck didn't want himself associated with that ridiculous display, because he knows uh what alliance he has to be in if he wants to protect his his country against uh being completely overwhelmed by China and taking you know maybe a third of it away from India away from them.
And India is you know suffering from a 50 percent tariff uh because they are trading with with uh because they're trading with Russia and therefore financing uh the Ukraine war.
Uh they and China and uh or basically China is about 50 percent, and they're about 30 percent.
Now, I don't know if they haven't stopped.
I think they may have, which is putting a lot of pressure on Russia and a lot of pressure on China, because China doesn't have the money to really back them up.
There was an interesting conversation.
I don't know if we picked this up, Ted.
There was an interesting conversation that got picked up, apparently uh over the microphones, in which uh the two megalaniacs and murderers, uh Xi Jinping and Putin basically discussed how they're gonna live forever with modern medicine.
very interesting thing is uh Xi Jinming expects to be able to use other people's organs in order to live.
And no country sells organs anywhere near the volume that China does because uh the Xi Jinming, who got a great, great hero's welcome by the Democrats in California, specializes in a massive business of taking organs from living people.
And we do have that uh 10.
The monster SOT 10.
play that.
The world's name is Hedda and the world's name is Hedda, and the world's name is Hedda.
The world's name is Hedda and the world's name is Hedda, we have a new name here, but the world's name is Hedda and the world's name is Hedda and the world's name is Hedda.
The world's name is Hedda.
Living to 15.
Wow.
Maybe they'll stuff them.
And march them out, you know, like they do with those uh with those Chinese figures.
They'll just go like they'll go like that, march out, march them out, and he'll give orders.
Well, we're going to take a short break and we'll be right back.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today'd be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with Airwaterhealing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love.
They require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats.
Don't wait to get your V3 from Airwaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lyndale for 20% off in savings and free shipping.
That's promo code Lindell at Airwaterhealing.com.
Too many pharmacies and insurance companies are blocking the medications that actually work.
That's why I recommend all family pharmacy.
They give you access to treatments like ivermectin now, starting at just $2 a capsule.
They also have methylene blue, hydroxychloroquine, and so much more.
They're helping you stay prepared, and they've dropped their prices by 25%.
Also use promo code Lindell10, you save even more.
Go to all family pharmacy.com forward slash Lindale, use promo code Lindell10 and get the medicine you need.
Are you taking advantage of President Trump's golden age?
Or what if I told you you can just sit back and earn money as President Trump continues to repair our economy and make America energy independent again.
I'm talking about oil royalty chips.
With the help of the Oxford Club, thousands of Americans have unlocked this secret hack that has put money back in hard work in American pockets.
Financial expert and Lindale TV supporter Mark Lynchenfield has showed me how.com to find out how this all works and why it's relevant right now.
That's Lyndale Oilboom.com.
whether it's being a weekend way or spending time with your family, feeling your best is the key to doing the things you love.
That's why I'm excited to tell you about Nirvana.
It's a natural solution designed to help you stay active and live well naturally.
Nirvana is a topical blend of all natural essential oils like frankincense, myrrh, and a proprietary gold standard plant stock extract.
It's perfect for your hands, feet, knees, back, or anywhere else that needs a little extra care.
Use Nirvana proactively as part of your daily maintenance routine, and you're guaranteed you're gonna feel the difference.
Simply massage Nirvana in for at least 60 seconds, two to three times a day to get the best results.
And if you're not completely satisfied, you get your money back.
No questions asked.
There's simply no risk and no reason not to try Nirvana today.
Right now, you get 15% off with code Lindell exclusively at Nirvana Health.com.
So stop reaching out for that medicine cabinet.
Get Nirvana instead and experience the difference.
Go to NervanteHealth.com.
Use code Lindell to get 15% off today.
Nirvana Health.
Live well naturally.
Live well naturally.
Welcome back.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and it's the Rudy Giuliani show on Lindell TV.
Well, uh Putin uh Putin uh I thought dealt with this in a very, very nasty way.
And it didn't uh give us much hope that he's gonna reach any kind of an agreement, but he said, Oh, if Zelensky wants to meet with you, tell him to come to Moscow.
But we know what he's gonna do.
He's gonna tell, he's gonna tell uh Zelensky, give in.
Give me everything I want and extra.
Give me some more land.
I want all of Doness, so next time I next time I uh try to take the rest of you, you there won't be your fortifications in the way.
Uh give me everything else that I want.
Stay out of NATO, uh demilitarize.
So again, next time I want to take you over, you don't have a military.
And become friendly with me.
I mean, I'm really a nice guy.
I only, you know, I just I just killed your men and women uh to get your attention and children.
Um I don't see that as a serious offer uh at peace, uh, nor do I see it as one that we're we're we're gonna uh be too happy about.
Um and I'm just waiting for the shoe to drop because I think it will.
On on uh on uh Putin, because it's the only way to do the only way to deal with him.
The idea that he can be dealt with uh the way you would with a rational actor uh or a I wouldn't say I wouldn't say he's irrational, but he's a he is a monster.
So is uh who gets his way by force, and the only way to stop him is by force.
And it's gonna require our ruining their economy, which we are capable of doing.
And uh we should want to do it because it will help us long term, even to contain China.
Because a loss here for uh Russia is a loss for China, a gain for Russia is a gain for China.
So he can come to he can come to um he he can come to uh Russia while uh every night uh Putin, I guess the other night he used 500 drones, uh at Kiev, the capital city.
Um killed three, four people.
He now aims almost completely for uh for um civilian targets.
That's it's quite obvious that all he wants to do is inflict terror on them.
Uh he's given up trying to take extra territory, he just uh goes after civilian targets and try to tries to ruin their capital city.
Uh in fact, since I think this is correct, if I have this number right.
In July, that's you know, while peace is on in the air, right?
Uh Putin has killed 1,674 civilians, which is the most that we know of in any time during the war.
So while he's supposed to be creating an atmosphere for peace, he's killing off as many Ukrainians as he possibly can trying to take little little pieces of territory that don't have to have some meaning,
particularly the ones that creep ahead and don't ask, where we've explained to you Ukraine has a very, very solid fortification system that Russia wasn't able to crack, and they want it given to them because the estimate is that if they were to get what they haven't been able to get in the three provinces where they haven't made it 100% conquest,
it would it could take a million uh Russian soldiers, particularly given the um the incompetent and um barbaric nature of their warfare, uh where they don't they don't really use any strategies designed to uh designed to uh reduce the risk to human life.
Uh the deadline uh with Russia expires.
Uh are they is that suggesting that it expires tomorrow?
Isn't that is that correct?
If I see that there.
Well, no, that would exp that would suggest that it expired.
Did it expire on the 2nd of September?
Anybody know?
I mean, I see that I see that article from Newsweek.
It says Donald Trump's 50-day deadline to Russia expires.
It is dated September 2nd.
So he's got two deadlines that are both moving.
One is his deadline to um, one is his deadline to Hamas, and the other is his deadline to to uh Russia.
Uh and uh this one really being the more important more important one in terms of deadline, not in terms of outcome.
Um I don't know if we should expect some action from him very, very shortly, because I we don't see Putin moving toward embracing any of the positions that would make it possible uh to ameliorate the American or or Ukrainian concerns.
Uh there wasn't there was a comparison done uh of uh China and the United States suggesting that China is uh a country of uh a huge talent,
and it it it it it it it it it uh it kind of swings toward engineering and building because they're building so much more, they're constructing so much more than we are building, that we're not building very much, and we're more like a culture of warriors and uh uh people who make agreements and argue agreements and uh and I don't know, there's sort of an overgeneralization of that that may be true.
But uh do you think that uh what they build and how they build it, you really think they conceived of that?
Or do you think they stole that from us?
Or from somebody else?
There's no question they stole it from us.
If you go watch the way the buildings are constructed, you wouldn't be so shocked uh uh uh if you were a construction person like Trump wouldn't be, that they're using American basic basic structures of cons of how to do it.
Um the reality is that uh when push comes to shove uh and and uh we we want to escalate this race against him, which I think we're doing, we can pretty much stay a generation or two ahead of them.
And we have to start doing that, and I think we are.
I mean, that's why we see all of this investment that Trump is so uh anxious to get, I think he understands exactly what I'm what I'm what I'm talking about.
Uh but we can't keep our, I mean uh the pre President's got to keep his eye on Middle East.
He's gotta keep his eye on Russia.
He's got to keep his eye on uh Afghanistan and that that whole that whole that whole area as well.
He's got to keep uh keep his eye on China.
He's got to keep his eye on Taiwan.
I mean, go on and on and on and on.
And then, of course, there's always the Iranians.
And they certainly keep their eyes on us.
They've had a spy operating in the in the uh State Department for well, I mean, for probably for four or five years at least.
And I think they've known she's a spy for that period of time.
That's Ari Ariana Tabatabai.
Ariana Tabatabai is an Iranian uh uh born uh citizen who came to the United States with her parents uh who are uh major supporters of the insane um uh homicidal uh Ayatollah and the regime.
Uh she worked with Robert Malley, who has since been fired, suspected that he's a spy also uh for getting information to uh to the Iranians, and then uh also uh orchestrating the first peace deal,
which was uh not oh yeah, peace deal and uh uh cessation of testing, nuclear testing, which of course they just uh saw as a uh piece of paper to be laughed at.
Uh and they went ahead and and kept developing, kept developing, kept developing, so that once we pulled out, they were they hadn't lost a step.
So it would be nice to get her the hell out of the you of the of the of the State Department.
I mean, I don't know if we can convict her of being a spy, but we sure we sure know enough about her uh that we can do it.
And we can take away whatever whatever credit she gets for for being a uh uh uh undercover operative.
And she's a straight out and out spy.
That's what she is, that's what she's always been, and she hooked herself up with uh uh with uh the highest level of um of uh uh of American Iranian uh intelligence services.
Pretty damn good.
And she worked with she worked with um she worked with a guy who's been indicted and I guess he ran away or got away, or we let him go, or we didn't want him to, I guess, lose his usefulness to Iran.
We're always very careful about having to have a fair fight with Iran because uh they don't really have very much, so we really should make their uh military even to ours before we fight with them.
Isn't that what you're supposed to do, Ted?
If you're ahead, you're supposed to give them if you have more armaments than they do, then you give them you give them some of yours, right?
Right.
That's what they say.
So to buy uh t uh teachers uh in the United States, and she uh teaches um, well, she teaches Muslim dogma.
They're supposed to kill you, they're supposed to kill Jews, she hates Jews.
Her language on Judaism is inflammatory.
It's disgusting.
Um she was a top aide to Robert Malley, who has been indicted, suspended in uh 2023 for mishandling prosecutorial material.
And um I do not understand why she's still pulling down her salary from the Pentagon, and I don't understand why we still have her on board.
I presume there's a good reason, and I'm not gonna push it too too too far.
Um, I think you know how concerned uh President Trump has been about our allies, right?
And maybe you think that sometimes he overdoes it when he's concerned about them.
Uh and maybe maybe you think that my emphasizing that uh the most popular name in England right now is Mohammed, that I'm I'm uh that I'm kind of suggesting hate of Muslims.
I'm not I'm just pointing it out.
I'm pointing out the infiltrations they're making, what they're breaking down.
But you but they get right directly at it.
There's an uh uh front page headline in uh yesterday's Sunday Express done for Sunday.
Uh and here's the headline.
Just put it up, Ted.
I've got to really be it would shock the hell out of me if I were English.
Most Britons would refuse to fight for country.
What?
Yeah, most would refuse to fight for the country.
How about 64% if you want to get exact?
You want to make it worse?
Another six percent are unsure.
So we're talking about 70% who uh right now you can't count on to fight for their country if it's against poor uh Iran or uh even poorer uh Pakistan.
The the um Iranian Islamic Republic, the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is a Shiite kingdom, has made spectacular inroads in the Islamic community, certainly in the Shiite community, but even strangely, against predictions in the Shiite uh uh community.
That's an a uh an amazing statement from a country that fought to the death to resist German control.
But they'll take they'll take control from uh maybe it's because uh most of them are name Mohammed.
So they figure what the heck?
Let's uh I wonder how they're gonna uh it really would be a shame if they tossed in the Magna Carter for Sharia law.
Well, don't don't put it to the citizens, apparently, according to this poll almost, right?
And demographics in the London area particularly something wrong.
I want to I want to go uh we gotta stop off in England next time we go over that way, Ted.
We gotta do a little checking around.
We do uh by maybe you you should do it so they don't recognize me.
Right.
And see how do they feel?
I do get I do get a lot of stuff from English people about how annoyed how their country is becoming taken over by a by a religion that is um in the final analysis dedicated to war and conquest.
When I say final analysis, it goes through a phase with Mohammed where it's peaceful, but it ends up being you have to spread it by death and war and killing.
And you're entitled to do it if they're not if they're infidels.
Wow.
And that of course means you and me are in their sights.
Right.
We're going through that same situation here in America, aren't we?
So we have we have a Muslim mayor in London.
We have a Muslim mayor in Paris.
We have many Muslim mayors in the countryside of London, and we have about 20% of the territory, I believe under Muslim rule, much of it under Sharia law.
Now I don't know if that means that they can beat the hell out of their wives, but they can under Sharia law.
I don't know why English women are putting up with it.
No.
No.
Thank you.
I don't I don't understand it.
I don't understand what's happening.
I don't understand what's happening to their morale to their Christianity.
I do know because I follow this quite a bit, I do know that the majority of religion in England now, or not the majority, the plurality of religion in England right now is the Roman Catholic religion, which seems to negate hundreds of years of the work of Henry the Eighth and Elizabeth I. They killed an awful lot of people to get there.
Um America is going through that in certain cities in in your city in Detroit in Dearborn, right?
Oh, and certainly, and then some other Muslim majority cities in the area.
The tier border is the one that comes to mind as the home of sort of the Arab home in America.
Yes, and then you can't forget all the notoriety that Ham Tramic Michigan received over the course of remember when the Muslim mayor of Ham Tramic endorsed Trump last site.
We had a big office there, Trump equals peace.
So they really did kind of swing over our way this cycle.
And then I think I I think that um it gets complicated by October by uh by October seventh, doesn't it?
Well, yes, of course.
Yep.
So we're going to switch over to um X to continue our exploration of the things that are not covered for you that should be, and cover it accurately, so you get to hear all of it, not just some of it.
And also uh talk to you practically about what can be done at this level on this stage of the danger presented to the United States to protect us.
There's plenty you can do about it.
Well, we'll be back very shortly, have a good break, and then you come right back because we have an extraordinarily exciting show for you.
▲
Export Selection