All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 5, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
52:26
The Rudy Giuliani Show: Tuesday, August 5, 2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello, this is Rudy Giuliani, and this is the Rudy Giuliani Show.
And we are very happy to be with you.
I hope you're ready for a pretty non-complete, for a pretty non-complete evening.
It's going to be dominated with usually a lot of controversial things, as we always have.
But let's begin with the fact that it started off as a surprise.
Today started off as a big surprise because one figures in the morning, the president is at home getting up, having breakfast, sometimes very early morning meetings, sometimes early morning devoted to more personal things.
He gets started pretty early in the oval, probably before nine for sure, although he's working upstairs a lot.
I used to work upstairs with him a lot between 7 and about 8:45.
But today, the press was really surprised to find him someplace else.
You know, yesterday, he made an announcement and he put out a draft executive order to prohibit banks from discriminating against conservatives.
Now, he mentioned, you know, what they had done to him and many other people, of which he has, you know, a lot of evidence, just manifold evidence.
I have actually never told them all the discriminating they did against me.
He doesn't even have that evidence.
It was really, really hard to find a place to put my business for banking, even though in the bank that I was in, I had been there for 28 years.
And at the time, it was before it was before the lawyer who was a partner of Hunter Biden and a bunch of others led cases to try to put me in bankruptcy, and I had to go into bankruptcy, and I got out.
But this was way before that.
This is when the net worth was like in the millions.
And it was clearly because it was me.
In fact, several, I'm not certain, Dr. Maria's not here today, but in one case, she's president of the company.
In one case, they actually told her they feel bad about this, but the bank doesn't like to have, you know, people that are involved in this Trump controversy around.
So he's got plenty of witnesses if he needs them for cutting into these banks.
So let's play a clip from this morning.
How about the roof of the White House?
He's taking questions, or he was just a few moments ago.
Let's listen in, please.
You're looking good, Peter.
Where are you going to pull up here?
Something beautiful.
What does that mean?
What do you mean?
Four ways to spend my money.
Can you give us another hand?
I will.
I will show you.
It's just another way to spend my money for the country.
Are you sitting in a way, Nori?
Anything I do is finance by me, so you're not going to contribute.
Just like my salary is contributed and nobody ever mentions that.
Where are you going to add it on the metal?
Go back.
Quick.
What?
I think so.
Well, that's quite a thing to see earlier in the morning.
The president up on the roof, you know, he's building a new ballroom, which they could use, by the way.
The East Room theoretically has held like, I don't believe it's true.
They say eight, 900 people for a state dinner.
It must be they combine a couple of rooms for that.
There's no way the East Room holds 1,000 people for a dinner.
Might hold 1,000, more like 800, like for a concert.
I remember being in a concert there that I'll never forget.
It was Frank Sinacher and Tony Bennett entertaining Mr. and Mrs. Reagan.
And then when I represented President Trump, Jay Seklaw and I, I remember twice we snuck into concerts to have to get his attention down the side so nobody would see us.
Another time we were sitting in the audience waiting to get to him.
And several of the people were trying to, we know what you're doing here.
But they need a room that can hold a thousand or more people for ceremonial events, for state dinners, and honorary dinners,
you know, when people are getting a medal of honor or the astronauts are being congratulated or whatever, some great medical discovery or when the Yankees win the World Series, which we're going to talk about in a little while.
If they don't stop, it's starting to look a little remote if they don't start going in a different direction.
The Mex are also faltering, but they're holding on to their second place pretty tightly.
So that means they can, whatever happens, they can start it all over again in the playoffs.
The Yankees have to worry a little bit more about the playoffs.
So the president is going to do this executive order, which will involve regulations penalizing banks that cut off people for political reasons.
And there is, and I know the banks say they didn't do it.
It's not true.
I can tell you based on personal evidence that they do it and they did it to me.
And they did it to me for political reasons.
And an employee, you know, a nice person at the bank, admitted it and admitted the reason, the people connected with Trump.
And of course, I was a prominent person in that position.
And I, by far, without any doubt, wasn't the only one.
I can't tell you how many I've talked to that had the same exact problem I did.
And in some cases, had to go, you know, had to sort of set up a kind of list of what banks would deal with you.
Not terribly different than not being able to find a lawyer, not just for me, but for the people that were indicted with us in Atlanta, particularly.
One group of lawyers told me that they wouldn't represent me in front of a particular judge because she was so unfair to them.
They offered to represent other cases, but they wouldn't go in front of this judge.
They were so afraid of her.
They were afraid that she has a tendency to like to put you in jail, which you can't really remedy real fast.
And the particular circuit that you can pretty much guess wasn't terribly sensitive to the unfairness and dictatorial and fascist conduct of their judges, which is a disgrace that should be investigated and made an example of because we want to be able to believe that our courts should be looked up to with just respect and dignity.
And if you do that with a court that is practicing fascist tactics and conducting two-tier justice, which is a serious, it's a euphemistic form of a very serious kind of injustice, right?
But you can't just smile at that.
This is like taking away our country when courts aren't fair.
And they sure weren't.
I mean, unfair would be a total denigration of what actually happened.
Well, it looks like some people may start to be held to account who are not, first of all, who are actually guilty, because the people that were going after regarding Trump were all not guilty and were being pursued in extremely exaggerated fashion.
If we want to look at some of the January 6th people that might have committed misdemeanor crimes or something like that, exaggerated into, you know, treason, 10 years in jail, 20 years in jail.
How about the worst of all?
No, no bail.
So you go to jail before you're convicted or commit suicide.
I mean, the reality is all that has to come out.
Now, this is not investigating him over J6, although they think that has to happen too.
This is, boy, does this have a long time coming?
Bill and Hillary Clinton have been subpoenaed in the Epstein affair.
But that's really good that somebody's paying attention to the guy that was with Epstein the most rather than the guy that was with him the least.
I mean, given the enormous amount of evidence available of Clinton's familiarity, friendship, and hanging around with Epstein, why are the headlines all about Trump,
who got rid of him, who got rid of him 20 years ago, maybe 21 years ago, unceremoniously kicked him the hell out of Mar-a-Lago and the golf course.
Now, just as a shrewd detective, which I am, and this is no reflection at all on the president's character, but if you had the worst thoughts about President Trump, right, you still would agree with me that he's one shrewd guy, right?
You would, right?
So now, why would he over the dispute really was over his harassing a young woman who was the masseuse?
But in any event, whether it was about that or about some kind of competing bid on a piece of property, which I don't recall at all, I do recall the incident with the masseuse.
I don't recall it.
I mean, it was recounted to me by several reporters, and I saw some of the documents they had of it.
But in any event, if you were compromised by this weasel, right, which I tend to think he probably did to protect himself, you never would have thrown him out.
You'd been ingratiated to him forever, the way Biden was, right?
And the way Clinton was.
You don't get away with anything.
There is no picture of Donald Trump in Epstein's house, or should I say, full-length portrait in a dress that exists of Bill Clinton.
Do we have a picture of that?
American people haven't seen that in a while.
This is one of the times that he wasn't inhaling, I think.
Remember, he smoked marijuana.
He admitted smoking marijuana.
But Bill Clinton is constitutionally incapable of telling the truth.
So he had to say that he doesn't know how to inhale.
Yeah, we should have that picture that's V01.
I understand it.
There he is.
I understand after that appeared, he got several harassing phone calls asking him for a date.
You know that?
Yeah, from France.
Who the?
Yes.
Who looks at that and says, yeah, that's who I want to get on going.
Now, does that prove anything?
No.
Does it show the disparity in treatment where somehow we're led to believe that Trump was extraordinarily close to Epstein when he hadn't seen him in 20 years and threw him out of both his club and golf course and his bosom buddy here?
That's our former president, all right.
Okay.
Now, I can't really spend too much time complaining about his dress that way, since, of course, I dress that way several times for plays.
I did it for, I did it for Victor Victoria.
I dressed up as Julie Andrews did it with me and showed me how to showed me how to do it.
There was another occasion.
Oh, I dressed up as an Italian grandmother for Saturday Night Live with Sherry O'Terry.
Oh, and then in a remake of the earlier one, The Victor Victoria, I did one with then Donald Trump, who was kidding around with me in a department store.
It's interesting with the department.
I should have thought of that during his trial.
In that department store, there must have been 200 people around us when we were there, which is what would have happened to him if that incident alleged by that liar actually occurred.
He would have gone into that department store, and there'd been no way he could have been alone with her if he ever wanted it.
If there's any doubt in your mind that that isn't exactly somebody he'd want to be alone with.
And unless you're completely wacky out of your mind, you don't go take advantage of a woman in a very, very small area of a dressing room in the most popular department store in New York City, if not in the world, where you are well known and are fawned on when you come in.
So they're going to be called in for the Epstein.
They're going to be called in for Epstein.
That's one of the things.
I mean, it gets complicated because there's so many different, today, two different investigations yesterday were in the news.
They could tend to get you confused because they just throw out the names of people subpoenaed.
So the Epstein investigation is with the House subcommittee that wasn't able to get Biden.
I've forgotten the name of it.
They're going to have all those people there at least.
But the Clintons are a part of it.
So that be, Ted, does that suggest that this begins on August 18th?
The circus begins on August 18th.
Well, that's what they, that is their track record how this works.
We may never see this.
I would not imagine that 2026.
I would imagine the odds in Las Vegas are going to be against catching anybody, since in the case of Joe Biden, the evidence was shoved in his face and he ignored it.
I see Garland and Comey and Clinton, Clintons are really way down the road.
They're going to have plenty of time to prepare.
Are they the last witnesses?
Yeah.
Let's go back over the other list.
Garland and Comey, I see that.
Let's go back to VO2.
Yeah, there we go.
I guess Comey was the head of the FBI when the Epstein case began.
Alberto Gonzalez was AG.
Well, Alberto Gonzalez was the AG 2006.
when they made the original deal.
The original deal that's considered to be Of course I did.
I knew him well.
That was a big deal when he got the job, when he got to be AG.
That was a big deal.
And remember, the U.S. attorney who had the case, who you and I spoke to.
He happened to be put at the same table as us.
I mean, I have no, I don't know.
I don't know him at all.
I have no, I have no problem.
Yeah, I do.
Nice guy.
He wasn't labor secretary.
I was a reporter.
He actually explained it as, it sounds to me, and I'm extrapolating a little bit, and that's why you see Barr and Gonzalez there.
That decision, that original decision where he was involved with a young child, he got a very short sentence and really no penalties afterwards.
The U.S. attorney who handled that case in Texas, it was, said at the time, he didn't say to us, but he said at the time when he explained it, that this was a call from above.
And he always thought it had to do with his working with intelligence agencies.
That's the reason I think you see Gonzalez there.
He'd be the one that would know that.
Bill Barr, of course, was getting confirmed when the second Epstein case began.
So that, so that's why I think you see Comey.
Comey was probably the FBI director when he got arrested the second time.
I guess Mueller was involved in his case as a Justice Department employee.
Garland, of course, is Attorney General.
Comey, also the original arrest.
And then, of course, Hillary Clinton, money from him, lots of money.
And Bill Clinton, an undisclosed number of personal visits that range from a minimum of three or four, which he's, I think, admitted to, at least on the airplane, going down on the airplane.
I don't know if he's admitted to going down to the island to 27 alleged trips to the island by who I guess the guy that'll be the star witness, Bill Clinton.
But it'll be very interesting to see if Bill still has the same capacity to schmooze us that he had when he said, I never had sex with that woman.
I never had sex with that woman.
And Hillary then, as he was saying that, Hillary did everything she could for quite some time to destroy her reputation.
Hillary was very good at that.
That was her job in the original election, possibly back in Arkansas too, where they have quite a reputation, the Clintons, for skullduggery and dishonesty.
The other investigation is a grand jury investigation.
Now, that's a grand jury investigation of right now.
Right now, it's sort of narrowing in on the effort to frame Trump with the Russian collusion purchased hoax, which could be one of the greatest scandals of American history,
if not that, the one that really shows how terribly corrupt we are.
Because there wasn't a person that was writing about that that didn't know that at least it was extraordinarily exaggerated.
Many of them knew it was completely false and very early on found out it was purchased.
But covered it in a way that is impossible for you to believe unless you were there.
Because you wouldn't believe that people could be that dishonest.
And you couldn't believe that these people you see on television who held a responsible government position were that evil to do something like this.
Because they didn't just attempt to destroy their psychologically psychologically impaired with regard to Trump.
But what about hurting all these other people, people you never heard of and people hopefully you're not going to hear of again because they've gone off in their private life.
But I mean, they were on their way to ruining, if they didn't ruin a lot of lives, just in order to dishonestly keep out a president who looks to be certainly the best president of this century, certainly the best president.
And that's not him.
There's the guy that doesn't love America.
You know, I get proven right on almost everything.
One time in about 29, 2010, 11, I don't remember exactly when.
At a meeting of Republican donors, we were talking about Obama kind of freelancing, I guess, but we were saying, what's the core thing that's really wrong with his presidency?
And I said, I think the thing wrong with him is he, I'm like, he's the only American president.
Where when I look at him and see him and hear him, particularly hear him, I don't feel that he loves America.
I'm not sure I ever heard him say I love America.
I don't think I remember a president that hadn't said that several times, including Clinton.
I love America.
But I said that.
One of the people at the loyal Republicans at the Republican leaked that to the press, of course, and it became a great big hit on me for being a racist.
Well, I didn't say anything about his being half white and half black.
I didn't say that.
I wasn't referring to that.
I was referring to the fact that he doesn't seem to love America.
I mean, later on, I said the same thing about Shifty Schiff.
And gee, as far as I can tell, he's white, right?
I can distinguish race and love of America.
There are a lot of people who are black or mixed race or white or Asian or whatever that love America.
And unfortunately, there are some that hate it.
Now I've come to the conclusion, and that was a tentative conclusion.
Now I've come to the conclusion that it's absolutely right that he and his wife bear a great animosity for this great country that's been so good to them.
And they've done many, many things to deliberately hurt America.
I think this is one of them.
Whether they can prove it or not, we'll see.
The immunity thing, of course, is an obstacle, but they're making too much of it because so much of this conduct happens after he's president.
And he did make statements after he was president showing that he was still involved in it, aware of it, and pushing it.
So I don't see how he gets immunity for that if there's criminal conduct involved.
But in any event, it doesn't shield all of the others that are being called before the grand jury: Clapper, Brennan, Comey, and then I could, so many, so many others.
The congressional people like Shifty Schiff was, I have evidence of direct evidence of Trump being involved in Russian collusion.
He might have even said witnesses, which he's never produced and never, I'd say he's going to have to produce it, or that's going to be used as a very, very strong piece of evidence that he was part of the conspiracy and that those statements were overt acts in pursuance of the conspiracy.
I mean, this is no joke, removing a lawfully elected president based upon false testimony, perjured testimony, purchase testimony, purchased with over a million dollars in laundered funds.
Well, Hillary, Hillary is, Hillary authorized that.
Now, we'll have to see if she tries to lie her way out of it or how much evidence there is to put that together.
I know there is evidence to put it together.
So Hillary is exposed in that investigation, hasn't been subpoenaed yet, but it was really originally all for her benefit.
That first meeting at the White House where Obama took it over in Brennan was for her benefit.
I don't see how Obama may have been the director as he was the director of Numbskull's presidency.
But she was the beneficiary and one of the financiers of it.
So you have the Coomer investigation, which is a House investigation by a committee, or at least by a chairman.
He doesn't let anybody else in the committee talk.
It's hard to know who else is on that committee, but he should because he's not very good.
And then you have the Justice Department investigation.
And in fairness, now, even a Coomer, the Justice Department has many more tools to be able to get at what they need to.
The thing wrong with Coomer is he couldn't handle evidence that was smashed right in his face.
And he didn't know how to use it.
Some of it being something that a first-year law graduate would be able to figure out how to use.
Admissions, admissions against interest, admissions against penal interest.
These are all very, very significant things under the law in terms of credibility.
I'd say that they're really, really hoping with this Epstein thing that after, I think we're on chapter seven now in the book, How to Destroy Trump.
It starts with Russian collusion.
It then goes to the falsely attributed Ukrainian conversation.
That one lies with Schiff, Shifty Schiff.
Now, I consider this all part of one conspiracy.
I know they're doing it as separate ones, but I think it I think it immediately becomes easier to prove, easier to get a jury over the initial reluctance of convicting a president or people at a very high level if you show them the enormity of the proof.
So the ball started rolling with Russian collusion, but it's still rolling.
And now the ball is rolling with Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein.
And I can assure you, it's almost like the beginning again.
I was absolutely certain that Russian collusion was a false charge because I was with Trump during most of that campaign.
And at certain times, I was with him, what you might regard as 24 hours a day except sleeping time.
And he had nothing to do with the Russians.
It's just, I mean, I didn't know the, of course, I didn't know that Hillary had paid for it.
If I had known that, I would have assumed she'd go to jail.
At that point, I still thought we were America.
But they deprived us of America for four or five years.
So they're doing the Epstein thing now.
Now, of course, I don't think this is to impeach.
Who knows if they get control of the House or whatever.
There's too much counter evidence here.
It might slow them down.
But in any event, they are hoping that this is really going to hurt Trump.
Really going to hurt him.
Well, so far, everything they've tried, going back to indicting him and convicting him of a felony, which elected him president, just backfires in their lying, scummy faces.
So his base hasn't changed through any of this, including all the Epstein files.
Hasn't changed.
Then remember, if Trump bombs Iran, his base will run out on him.
His base supported it 84%.
So he had like the other 16% answer the question wrong.
They thought they were talking about Biden.
84%.
Now we have another one.
If he continues to support Betanyal with regard to Hamas and Iran, his base, who is pacifist and isolationist, will discard him.
It turns out that although there's been a little slippage in support for Israel in America, still a majority of America supports Israel.
And even a teeny bit of slippage among Republicans has it down to 70% with whatever is going on in Gaza, which is a complete, again, hoax.
Of course, they're starving because Hamas kills the people who bring the food to them.
How about that?
Or steals it, which they've been doing forever.
And when the UN handled it, it was given directly to them.
So Bibi made an interesting statement, which was supposed to be, was originally leaked as Bibi is going to agree to either a ceasefire or a peace or whatever.
Well, he has, but he's thrown in full occupation for a while by Israel of Gaza.
Now, do you see Hamas agreeing to that?
I don't see them agreeing to it.
I mean, so far, they haven't agreed to recognize Israel, which makes it all a non-starter.
Oh, a non-starter for the last 35 years, but that doesn't stand in the way of people having a two-state solution.
Forget who the states are and even forget the history of it for a minute.
Just use your logic and let's see if you pass intelligence 101.
There are two entities.
One is an established country.
The other is a group of people who claim a part of that established country.
The claim is dubious to start with.
And they try to advance that claim by massive killing of the group of people in the country and their supporters.
And very early on, while the killing by this group is going on, the president of the United States, who we saw in address before, says, well, let's have a two-state solution.
We're going to have that group that goes and kills the people in that country that they want a part of.
We're going to make them equal to the other one.
And we're going to have the other one say, this group of people that is dedicated with a blood oath to destroying us, we're going to let them just have that country.
But would you, even as a neophyte political figure, political thinker, foreign policy analyst and historian, me, wouldn't you come to the firm conclusion this will never work?
Do you have to be a genius to come to that conclusion or just an honest person?
I'd say just an honest person.
And it's the same today as it was then and will always be because Israelis are not suicidal.
If they were, they wouldn't be probably one of the greatest examples of building a great country out of nothing in a place where everybody else has built nothing and nothing is opposing them.
Some have advanced now, but it's taken a while.
But the one that wants to become a state would be a disgrace as a state.
So Bibi says he's in favor of it as long as there's complete occupation.
There are people raising the concept that the elimination of Hamas was an unrealistic goal in the first place, that you're not going to be able to do that.
And then, of course, we have the family members, which we'll get to when we come back, who want him just to end it and bring their horribly abused, tortured children home, which tears at your heart tremendously and does create a certain degree of unpopularity if the prime minister holds out.
But then the prime minister has to think of the whole country, right?
Not just the people that are taken.
Any war could be won that way.
Hitler could have taken five people and said, leave me alone or I'll kill your three children.
It's a tough one.
The question of whether eliminating Hamas is a realistic goal or not is something worth considering, although I think it is a realistic goal.
And I think they're close to it.
But I can understand why the complete elimination of it, because they can go underground or hide and cut her or whatever.
Maybe that, in that sense, they could be effectively eliminated.
People can go back and put it together again, right?
So let's take a short break and we'll be right back.
Whether it's being a weekend where you're spending time with your family, feeling your best is the key to doing the things you love.
That's why I'm excited to tell you about Nirvanta.
It's a natural solution designed to help you stay active and live well naturally.
Nirvanta is a topical blend of all natural essential oils like frankincense, myrrh, and a proprietary gold standard plant stock extract.
It's perfect for your hands, feet, knees, back, or anywhere else that needs a little extra care.
Use Nirvanta proactively as part of your daily maintenance routine, and you're guaranteed you're going to feel the difference.
Simply massage Nirvante in for at least 60 seconds two to three times a day to get the best results and if you're not completely satisfied you get your money back no questions asked there's simply no risk and no reason not to try nirvanta today right now you get 15 off with code lindel exclusively at nirvantahealth.com so stop reaching out for that medicine cabinet get nirvanta instead and experience the difference go to nirvantahealth.com
Use code LINDELL to get 15% off today.
Nervonta Health.
Live well, naturally.
Friends, we all know the truth.
Big Pharma and the federal bureaucracy have made a mess of health care in this country.
And boy, that's an understatement.
President Trump signed an executive order to bring prices down, and that's a great step.
But we know that real change takes time.
There's one pharmacy that is already stepping up.
I want to tell you about All Family Pharmacy.
They're not waiting.
They're taking action now with a summer sale that gives you the power to take control of your health.
Right now, through the end of June, you get 20% off, site-wide, no insurance required.
Did you hear that?
20% off, site-wide, no insurance required.
They work with licensed doctors in all 50 states,
they ship fast straight to your door whether it's ivermectin hydroxychloroquine methylene blue antibiotics emergency kits or your daily prescriptions this is a time to stock up if you believe in medical freedom if you're tired of waiting for someone else to fix things do what i do take action go to allfamilyphharmacy.com slash lindell and use promo code lindell20 l i n
d e l 20 for 20 off your entire order that's all familypharmacy.com lindell promo code lindell20.
Let's protect our families, defend our freedom, and make America healthy again together.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today would be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with AirWaterhealing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love.
They require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats, don't wait to get your V3 from airwaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lindel for 20% off in savings and free shipping.
That's promo code Lindel at airwaterhealing.com.
The last time President Trump was in office, gold soared 50% and silver went up a huge 53%.
Americans who invested in silver and gold during Donald Trump's first presidency are very happy that they did it.
And right now, gold continues to soar to the highest numbers in history.
These gains are just an appetizer for what's to come.
Some market analysis are saying that gold is predicted to rise another 30% in the next year alone.
So now's the time to invest in gold and silver.
And that's why I partnered with Fisher Liberty Gold.
Fisher Liberty Gold is a conservative owned and operated precious metals investment company.
They even helped my good friend President Trump get elected through their contributions to Turning Point USA and other conservative groups.
I have dedicated my life to ensuring that people get the best sleep ever.
And in addition to owning a MyPillow, I can now sleep well at night knowing that you can all protect your savings with precious metals with Fisher Liberty Gold.
With Fisher Liberty Gold, you can sleep well knowing that your retirement is secure.
And if you call now, you're going to receive your very own presidential gold guide and qualify for up to $20,000 in free silver.
But wait, there's more.
Call now or text medals to 26786 to receive your presidential gold guide from Fisher Liberty.
And for a limited time, I will send you a free MyPillow for qualified accounts.
This presidential gold guide from Fisher Liberty will tell you exactly why you need to own gold, even while Donald Trump is president.
And just by calling in, you get a free MyPillow for a limited time for qualified accounts and up to $20,000 in free silver.
So don't wait.
Call 1-888-4GOL19 or text medals to 26786 today.
That's 1-888-4GOL-19 or text medals to 26786 today to receive your free MyPillow and up to $20,000 in free silver.
you I'm going to go with the mother.
Welcome back.
This is Rudy Giuliani.
This is the Rudy Giuliani show on Lindel TV.
There was a very, very heart-rendering, rending plea from the mother of Ram Brazlovsky.
Ram Braslovsky is one of the two young men that was featured in both the short and the long version of a video, which in and of itself is an act of war for which no one is being held to account.
There are innumerable acts of war, inhumane treatment, violations of international law.
So many it would be impossible for someone as inept as the people at the International Court of Justice to keep account of them.
But why they're prosecuting a prime minister and his chief of his army who go out of their way not to kill civilians, including giving warnings of strikes and things like that, and then allow the other side not only not to do that, but to use videos as a way of extorting the other country.
That is out and out an act of war and an act of inhumane treatment and a gross violation of international law.
It's not even criticized.
It's not even criticized by the Times, the entire pro-Hamas, pro-Islamic extremism, pro-Iranian regime of American media.
Don't even criticize what was done just the other day by Hamas by putting out these two young men who look like they've gone through the Holocaust and look like they're dying.
And according to Rahm in his communications about this, he is dying.
The 90-second clip which they put out involving Ram, which the other was Evatar Heviatar David.
He was the one shown digging his grave.
Ram's mother, Tammy, held a press conference yesterday begging, as she, I would say, as any of us would, for the Israeli government to do everything.
Get her son back.
I can't sleep.
I can't live.
You have to stop what you're doing here.
What's wrong with you?
What's gotten into you?
Why are you doing this to us?
Bring in food.
I am surviving on less than a liter of water, he added.
I assume he's talking about his own government there, although it is a bit ambiguous.
And of course, the pressure on Israel is end the war, get the hostages back, and whatever remains of Hamas.
And enough remains so that they can keep these hostages, right?
It isn't as if it's completely disappeared.
And Netanyahu's goal of unconditional victory, which was, of course, our goal against a Nazi extermination group, will not be reached.
The Barak Elhud Barak, former prime minister, friend of mine, also was very harsh on Netanyahu, saying he's continuing this war to maintain his hold on power, because should he end the war, his right parts of his right-wing coalition will break away and he'll have no government.
Well, I would say to Elhud, who's a very, very decent man and a good man, I would say to him, and of course they've been rivals on different sides since they were born, I think.
It's a little harsh and not necessary at a time where national unity is really necessary.
And the interpretation, I would say it's fair to interpret Netanyahu as doing everything he can to have his people survive.
And it is a very difficult, soul-wrenching decision to decide what do you do about hostages in a situation like this.
To argue, and it sounds very cold-hearted when you do it, right?
But to argue that you can't negotiate with terrorists over hostages, otherwise you're going to have endless numbers of hostages.
They're going to learn the practice, and they're going to learn they can take advantage of it.
And they're going to learn that when they get taken by the Israelis, it's just a matter of time before they get back into the army again, because they'll take as many Israelis, whether it's a time of war or peace, whether that was the right practice or not.
On the other hand, the humanity of it is overwhelming.
I mean, they'll say, we'll give you 1,000 back for one, which they did.
Now, one of the people they gave back in that particular trade is the guy who led the effort against them on October on October 7.
That's what you're in for.
A lot of the, I shouldn't say a lot.
Some of the people they've released have been used against them.
Some of the people Obama released were used against us.
And maybe if you know you're in a region of the world where they're going to consider using that tactic, maybe the tactic has to be, you take our people.
We take what is one of the best extraction forces in the world, or IDF, and we're sending them in to get them.
You want a real cold analysis that's logical?
You're going to kill some of them anyway.
I bet in our extraction, we get out more alive than four years from now we get back from you.
We think, I don't know how many they've killed that they had, but they say right now there are like 20 alive and 30 dead.
How many would have died if there was an extraction attempt?
How many would have been saved?
If you do extraction and massive penalties for it, including trying to eliminate them, you have a much better chance of saving the next guy.
At least that's my thought.
And it is not an irrational one or a cruel one.
It depends on who are you, whose lives are you trying to save.
Now, it is true.
One life is real and the others are hypothetical.
But how hypothetical are they when you have a group of people that have been killing you for 40 years and wake up every morning vowing to kill you again?
And most of the world on their side are not yours.
There's something wrong with that, by the way.
Really, really wrong with the world and the world community that we theoretically respect.
And I think Trump and many of his people disdain.
And maybe they're right, and they are right.
Meanwhile, Israel is not letting them stop doing what we should be doing, which is knocking the hell out of the House.
I don't know why we made peace with them without destroying them.
They are an Iranian proxy group that has participated as much as they can in helping the reign of terror create a Islamic caliphate in the world.
They do it from the sort of somewhat removed confines of Yemen, south of the Saudi Arabian Peninsula.
This little country that's worth, you know, worth less than probably our smallest state has at various times done billions, if not trillions of dollars worth of damage to world shipping.
They have killed Americans, which I will never forget, and about which we should get really even and not make peace with them.
And when they attempt to attack Israel, Israel fends off the attack now and then bombs the hell out of them.
So hopefully there's not too much left of them.
▲
Export Selection