All Episodes
Previous Next
July 23, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
58:13
The Rudy Giuliani Show: Wednesday, July 23, 2025
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Well, good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and this is the Rudy Giuliani Show on Lindell TV coming to you from Dover, New Hampshire.
And in some ways, this may be one of the more important stories that I ever get to cover.
But of course, I have been covering it for quite some time.
And I remember the first evidence that I got of Obama being involved way back in 2014 with the Ukrainians.
And of course, the shocking article in the New York Times in 2015 that laid out all of the unethical, certainly, and illegal,
probably activities of Hunter Biden at a time that the president, meaning President Obama, had just appointed Biden to be in charge of, in essence, to be in charge of Ukraine.
And here, this article is talking about how the son, that miserable creep that you saw on television, I don't know if you saw him on television the other night.
Now, I'm not even going to mention the name of the reporter because I can't remember and I never will remember it.
That's not a reporter.
He's really, well, I mean, like a lap dancer.
That's the way I would describe him.
He asks no tough questions.
We'll point out one or two along the way that would have been obvious even for a pig wanting to put some lipstick on itself.
So Obama, without any doubt, is the top dog here.
When they say big guy, they have the wrong big guy.
The big guy they have is Barack Obama.
He runs the administration.
None of this could have happened had he said no.
He wouldn't even have to have turned anybody in.
All he had to do, if he wanted to cover it up, but then not involve his country in disgraceful bribery and interference with national security and disgrace.
They just say, cut it out, Joe.
Take your demented head, go put it somewhere else, and get the degenerate drug addict who you already embarrassed yourself trying to get him into the military and he funked out right away.
Get him the hell out of Ukraine.
This is serious business, Joe.
This life and death business.
This isn't business for a couple of, for a bunch of little perverts from Delaware to be trying to make money.
But Obama didn't do that.
I hesitated to try to build much of a case against him just based on surmise.
I didn't realize there would be this unbelievably powerful evidence that we've gotten some of.
And I can see from the numerous redactions that I'd like, I think those redactions are only going to help.
But it's pretty darn clear.
I mean, it's as simple as this, right?
Why they spent all this time on it, I have no idea.
They knew from 2015 on, there was a meeting in 2015 that Biden was a part of.
That isn't recorded here, but I have that, in which they all talked about how Hillary was going to come up with something like this.
And then when Hillary got kind of, the case got fixed the way Obama wanted by Comey, but Comey hit her kind of hard, and that she was going to need something to, they decided they would revive this.
So Hillary poured in 1.1 million of her own money.
Who knows how much other money went in?
And they wrote a novel, which is called Russian Collusion.
It's not, it's had no, I don't think it has any basis in fact.
Now, you know, there could be one little thing or two little things.
I've never seen anything quite like that.
I've never seen anything so bold as that.
Usually when you seek to frame somebody, you start off with a couple of facts that they may be innocent, but at least they're indisputable.
You know, he spent a lot of time going to Russia or he had said a lot of favorable things about Russia or he did a lot of business in Russia or none of that being true, by the way.
So they went and they got a broken down old bum of an intelligence agent who they either knew or didn't bother to check, hadn't been in Russia for 17 years, which would therefore make almost everything, he says, that much more incredible.
And he came up with a tale, which if you read it, you had to be a jackass to believe it.
You know, he went there, he was shaking people down.
He didn't like the bedroom they gave him, so he peed on the bed.
And he was an agent at one point in the skilled dossier.
I mean, they even changed this.
They said five years, he was an agent of the Russians or 10 years or 20 years.
All three are listed as the time period for it.
One would think if it were true, it would have a true date where it started.
So they took it out for a ride.
And the original ride, if you would go back to my podcast, I think my fourth one, you will know was described to one of our witnesses, Lyshenko, by a person running for the Democratic National Committee.
They're going to reveal this thing that they had created.
They were going to reveal it around the end of the summer, the beginning of September of 2020.
Now, I'm supplementing what she has with the facts that I have, which I have described to you many times.
And if you go back to my podcast, you'll see the documents that support this.
I mean, without any of this, by October of 2020, actually by March of 2020, I would have been fully prepared to recommend, had I been a Justice Department official,
an indictment of Joe Biden for running a racketeering enterprise and taking money from Ukraine, Russia, Romania, and China.
Without the hard drive, it would be considerably less money.
I'd have been talking about a $20 million, $30 million bribery case, which would have been the biggest one I ever did, and one of the biggest ones in American history.
Well, this turns out to be more like a 50 million plus bribery case.
And if you throw in the Ukrainian bribes, it goes over 100 million.
This is a shocking to the conscience case.
Biggest shocking part of it is that America was so corrupt that it couldn't handle it.
So now we have this report and we go look at, I mean, I wish I knew about it then.
They were just corroborating everything I was finding out, Ted.
I mean, this is remarkable.
It was like the old days.
I was working with the, it's like they were writing my reports.
I was writing the same reports.
Probably not as much as you had.
The minute they get this bullshit, in fact, this is after I already knew that it was false.
I see the date.
Bless you.
God bless you.
That's one of those that really cleans you out.
I'll tell you, Phil's good.
Oh, yeah.
You could hear it.
This one is really late.
I'm surprised they didn't have this before this.
This is August 31, 2016.
This is a Department of Homeland Security official tells James the stinking liar Clapper.
Isn't Clapper a disease of some kind?
I don't know.
That there was, this is a quote, no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.
We are working with CIA on a PDB submission on the threat.
The thrust of the analysis is there is no indication of Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.
However, as seen in recent media reporting, any cyber activity directed against the election is likely to have an effect on public confidence, even if the cyber operation is unsuccessful or not intended to impact the election.
Then you get to September 2nd, short while after, and it says, and they are now objecting to what the FBI wants them to write.
On page five, under the you, I'm sorry, there's a block here, adversaries with intent section would prefer for the first sentence regarding Russia's intent.
The way it coveredly reads, it would indicate that we have definite information that Russia does intend to disrupt our elections.
And we're uncomfortable making that assessment.
A couple of honest people in the FBI, huh?
Oh, does Bomber and Brennan and Clapper bury this boy?
You never read this, man.
As his lawyer, I never read this.
I knew this was true.
I didn't know there was An entry in an FBI report saying that we are uncomfortable making the assessment.
Why?
Because it's false.
Because to do so is to engage in a conspiracy to defraud, to alter the election of the election by the presentation of false information.
Also, we could do a charge of extortion if we bring back Lashenko as a witness, because this was intended to intimidate Trump out of the election.
So these guys are engaged in it.
I got you so many Rico predicates, boys and girls, this would be, except for the commission case where I had them all on tape, this would be the easiest.
And that didn't have as much evidence as this, and that never had an admission that was anywhere as good as Hunter Biden's admission that he gave half of his money all his life to his father, one ignored even by the Republicans who theoretically investigated this, if that's what you want to call it.
I don't know why you need much more than this.
I mean, it goes on and on and on to realize that this is a criminal case and that they're deliberately falsifying government reports.
The way it currently reads, it would indicate that we have definitive information that Russia does intend to disrupt our elections.
And we are uncomfortable making that assessment.
All through the Biden crooked administration, all during the time that Trump was impeached twice, they attempted to take a lawfully elected president out of office.
It's all based on falsified information.
So I don't know when he says treason, we go back to the definition of treason.
Maybe it doesn't fit the legal definition of treason, but it sure fits the vernacular definition of treason.
And it's punishable as extortion.
It's punishable as insurrection.
It's punishable as defrauding the operations of a government agency.
It's punishable where they have made out affidavits to the contrary.
We call that perjury.
It goes on and on, and we've read through the whole thing now that we've had time.
Russia is probably not going to be able to influence the election.
You never heard that, right?
But all the charges, the Russian collusion, when Mueller was investigating.
Mueller ever get this?
I don't know if his people had it and they never disclose it.
Maybe they should go to where they belong.
Oh, I'm sorry.
They're allowed to practice law and I'm not.
I turned out to be right about this and they turned out to be scumbag liars about it.
Rudy was right, yet again.
Yeah, but Rudy also had his profession taken away from him.
That needs to be fixed.
By these bums, by these anti-American traitors.
And I don't care, you are used to the, And then when he becomes president, lawfully, to try to dislodge him from office.
Isn't that called a coup?
So now, this is what the FBI said to Clapper and Brennan, the two guys that should be pretty soon in the slammer.
we agree with russia is not and will not be trying to influence the election Did you ever hear that in 2016?
Or then the hysterical reports afterwards, even when Mueller said there's no indication that Trump or anyone involved for Trump colluded with the Russians, but there was a lot of Russian influence on the election.
Why didn't he at least say, but there are people in the FBI that disagree, like this one here.
They don't give the name, but it's the chief of the intelligence branch.
Probably figure out who he is.
We agree with Russia probably is not and will not be trying to influence the election.
Think that it would have had a bearing on that big ridiculous.
You think the lying piece of crap, Shifty Schiff, knew that?
Of course he did.
Of course he did.
So then you have a number of other statements that they can certainly create impressions and other things, but that they don't have the capacity to really interfere and change votes.
And then they go on with several other reports from different offices about how there's no indication of it.
And then you get and then you get the following.
Based on some new guidance, this is not new information or new evidence.
Based on some new guidance, we're going to push back publication of this report.
It will not run tomorrow.
It's not likely to run until next week.
by this time the election is coming to an end.
And then you see that for the benefit of Obama and history, they changed the information pursuant to the POTUS tasking at Monday's meeting on Russian election meddling.
They want it rewritten.
The IC is prepared to produce an assessment based on the president's request.
So the CIA, the FBI, the NSA, and the DHS, all of which have been rendered as corrupt as the secret services in Russia and Germany and China, are now going to write up a report that supports what Obama wants
to hear.
So, and also there's a report here that I remember a lot of, a lot of, and this gets to be smaller in context, but in the wider context, just a piece of it, where lying Brennan says, I never wanted the, I never put much faith in the dossier, whatever, whatever, whatever.
Of course, it was the only evidence they had.
And here's, Shelby believes this should be responded to by the NIC as the dossier was a factor in the 2017 ICA on the election interference, in which an assessment of the document was added as an annex.
Now, he lied all throughout, saying that no credence was given to him, although he was the guy going around selling it.
So, all right, there's a lot more facts, and there could be a long time to review this.
What does this mean?
This means that Obama should be investigated for this with the same intensity and the same kind of an investigation that they did to Trump and with the same amount of money spent.
And they should find people who are enthusiastically anti-Obama and Biden to do it the way the people they selected for Trump were.
Remember, every one of Mueller's animals was a Democrat, including some that had citations of substantial number of ethical complaints for framing people.
So why not the same treatment?
Well, I'm not going to really recommend that.
I'm going to recommend honest, straight lawyers who aren't going to be affected by the swamp in Washington.
Theoretically, people who hadn't practiced in Washington, because it's hard to find an honest lawyer there.
So this should not be brushed aside.
This is not lawfare.
This is not getting even for anything that they did or didn't do.
This predated anything they did and was covered up.
This is the worst distortion of our beautiful government ever.
I don't know that any group of people, any group of Democrats, Republicans, or whatever Whigs or whatever else we had, has ever taken our government and turned it into something akin to a dictatorship, at least in the way its justice system was used.
This can't be tolerated.
This can't be allowed.
Just historically recording it is not enough.
The penalties that hold these people to account take their money away, take their positions away, and a large number of them, where appropriate, put them in jail for substantial periods of time because what they did was they destroyed our republic for a period of time.
And they tortured people.
When you put people in jail for things they didn't do, when you render them bankrupt and have them unable to get lawyers, when you have some of them committing suicide, this is a very, very serious crime.
This is not political.
I don't know that we'd ever be able to convince the rotten Democrats of that.
I hope there are some good Democrats.
I keep saying it.
I keep praying for it.
I don't know just how far the evil in the Democrat Party has spread.
It certainly spread very far.
And we'll have to find out.
And we'll have to find out exactly how much the press will cover this, the way they covered the persecutions of Trump or any of us with breathless enthusiasm and with a great penchant for accepting any lie possible, then accepted very high prizes for it.
Now those prizes have all been proven to be embarrassing, more than embarrassing frauds, and none of them have the courage to give them back or the decency or the honor.
Well, of course there has to be an investigation and it shouldn't be an investigation by the Congress.
I'm sorry.
The Congress, with very rare exceptions, is not capable of doing investigations.
There are reasons for it.
Maybe the kindest one we could say is they don't have subpoena power.
But when you read some of their analysis, you realize it goes deeper than that.
Should Trump have said that he's guilty of treason?
As a strict legal matter, it's not treason.
Speaking in the vernacular, double-crossing your country, if you want to look at it that way, it's Probably, I don't know of an American president that has double-crossed the United States of America more than Obama or Biden.
Biden, of course, we have to give a little of it to the fact that he's a demented, stupid old man.
Obama's comes from exactly what I said a number of years ago, for which I was seriously scolded.
And this is an understatement.
Obama doesn't love America.
I said that because I never heard him say he loved America.
And I heard his wife say those horrible things about, you know, America didn't do anything good until he got elected.
And that was almost America's turning out the lights when we elected him.
Product of very, very well thought out Marxist education.
So I don't know if we want to call it, I mean, we could go back to the insurrection argument.
It certainly is fraud and it's extortion.
And it carries many, many years in prison.
Also, by the way, when you're prosecuting Obama for this, also throw in all the money that he gave to the Ayatollah.
And take a look at accessory to murder for that one, huh?
What was the money for?
What does Iran use money for, Ted?
Right.
What do they use money for?
What's the first thing you say about Iran?
Republican damage.
Biggest sponsor of terrorism in the world.
They use that money to fund a number of their proxies.
Such as Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, who knows which gangs in Syria they're involved with.
Money is fungible.
So it doesn't have to be the $2 in cash that Obama gave.
It gives them the capacity to fund these people who kill Americans.
So Obama was funneling them money in cash secretly, hiding it, and in violation of our money laundering laws at a time in which they were using money to kill Americans.
And we have done nothing about it.
What kind of weak people are we that we let one of our leaders supply money to a terrorist who's intent on killing us?
And it was spent almost every day of his life chanting guests to America and has carried out a lot of those deaths.
I don't know.
Are we afraid to do it because he's some kind of prince?
Because he was the first black president?
I don't care if he was the first yellow president, pink president, green president, brown president, white president, or a mixture of all.
You give up money to a guy who's going around killing Americans.
I really think should be executed, but that's, you know, that was the old days.
I would like you, if you think I'm exaggerating, to just substitute bin Laden for the Ayatollah.
And you gave $100 million to Bin Laden.
Bin Laden was in the same business as the Ayatollah, except the Ayatollah was a much bigger player.
The business was funding terrorist groups against the West, with the major focus being the United States.
Bin Laden, of course, is directly responsible for the murder of Americans, and so is the Ayatollah.
We can go back to the Marine Barracks, the first Ayatollah.
We can talk about Salamani with the second Ayatollah.
So we're going to take a short break and we'll be right back.
Whether it's being a weekend warrior or spending time with your family, feeling your best is the key to doing the things you love.
That's why I'm excited to tell you about Nirvanta.
It's a natural solution designed to help you stay active and live well naturally.
Nirvanta is a topical blend of all natural essential oils like frankincense, myrrh, and a proprietary gold standard plant stock extract.
It's perfect for your hands, feet, knees, back, or anywhere else that needs a little extra care.
Use Nirvanta proactively as part of your daily maintenance routine, and you're guaranteed you're going to feel the difference.
Simply massage Nirvanta in for at least 60 seconds, two to three times a day to get the best results.
And if you're not completely satisfied, you get your money back.
No questions asked.
There's simply no risk and no reason not to try Nirvanta today.
Right now, you get 15% off with CodeLindel exclusively at Nirvantahealth.com.
So stop reaching out for that medicine cabinet.
Get Nirvanta instead and experience the difference.
Go to Nirvantahealth.com.
Use CodeLindel to get 15% off today.
Nirvanta Health, live well naturally.
Friends, we all know the truth.
Big pharma and the federal bureaucracy have made a mess of health care in this country.
And boy, that's an understatement.
President Trump signed an executive order to bring prices down, and that's a great step.
But we know that real change takes time.
There's one pharmacy that is already stepping up.
I want to tell you about all family pharmacy.
They're not waiting.
They're taking action now with a summer sale that gives you the power to take control of your health.
Right now, through the end of June, you get 20% off site-wide, no insurance Required.
Did you hear that?
20% off.
Site-wide, no insurance required.
They work with licensed doctors in all 50 states and they ship fast, straight to your door.
Whether it's ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, methylene blue, antibiotics, emergency kits, or your daily prescriptions.
This is a time to stock up.
If you believe in medical freedom, if you're tired of waiting for someone else to fix things, do what I do.
Take action.
Go to allfamilyphharmacy.com slash Lindell and use promo code Lindell20.
L-I-N-D-E-L-L20 for 20% off your entire order.
That's allfamilypharmacy.com Lindell.
Promo code Lindell20.
Let's protect our families, defend our freedom, and make America healthy again together.
With everybody talking about making America healthy again, I thought today would be a great day to talk to all my fellow patriots about the importance of making your homes healthy again.
Well, we have proudly partnered with AirWaterhealing.com and their revolutionary whole home air purification system.
The V3 from Airwater Healing does 3,000 square feet of purification.
It eliminates dust, mold, viruses, and odors.
But here's the part I love.
They require no filters to ever be changed and virtually no maintenance.
Whether you suffer from asthma, allergies, seasonal bronchitis, or just want to protect your family from the flu or even greater threats, don't wait to get your V3 from AirWaterhealing.com today.
Use code Lindel for 20% off in savings and free shipping.
That's promo code Lindel at airwaterhealing.com.
The last time President Trump was in office, gold soared 50% and silver went up a huge 53%.
Americans who invested in silver and gold during Donald Trump's first presidency are very happy that they did it.
And right now, gold continues to soar to the highest numbers in history.
These gains are just an appetizer for what's to come.
Some market analysts are saying that gold is predicted to rise another 30% in the next year alone.
So now's the time to invest in gold and silver, and that's why I partnered with Fisher Liberty Gold.
Fisher Liberty Gold is a conservative owned and operated precious metals investment company.
They even helped my good friend President Trump get elected through their contributions to Turning Point USA and other conservative groups.
I have dedicated my life to ensuring that people get the best sleep ever.
And in addition to owning my pillow, I can now sleep well at night knowing that you can all protect your savings with precious metals with Fisher Liberty Gold.
With Fisher Liberty Gold, you can sleep well knowing that your retirement is secure.
And if you call now, you're going to receive your very own presidential gold guide and qualify for up to $20,000 in free silver.
But wait, there's more.
Call now or text medals to 26786 to receive your presidential gold guide from Fisher Liberty.
And for a limited time, I will send you a free MyPillow for qualified accounts.
This presidential gold guide from Fisher Liberty will tell you exactly why you need to own gold, even while Donald Trump is president.
And just by calling in, you get a free MyPillow for a limited time for qualified accounts and up to $20,000 in free silver.
So don't wait.
Call 1-888-4GOL19 or text medals to 26786 today.
That's 1-888-4GOL19 or text medals to 26786 today to receive your free MyPillow and up to $20,000 in free silver.
you you There's been no transition from when I won.
I won that election.
And if you look at crooked Hillary Clinton, if you look at all of the different people, there was no transition because they came after me trying to do a coup.
They came after me spying on my campaign.
They started from the day I won and even before I won, from the day I came down the escalator with our first lady.
President Obama was sitting in the office, he knew about it too.
So don't tell me about a free transition.
Well, we have an update for you on the bombshell Russiagate story that the mainstream media, of course, won't touch with a 10-foot poll.
Tulsi Gabbard, who made a special guest appearance at today's press briefing, has declassified a report from the House Intelligence Committee revealing that there was no direct evidence Putin or the Russian government sought to help Trump win the 2016 election.
However, later in these same documents, we learn that Barack Hussein Obama himself ordered an actual rewrite of the intel to say that Putin did aspire to help him win.
There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false.
What also made it difficult for the CIA to cover their tracks is that they were not all on the same page.
In December 2016, President Obama and CIA Director John Brennan pushed to release intelligence linking Trump and Putin, despite objections from senior CIA officials who warned that some sources were unreliable and that the reports failed to meet the agency's publication standards.
Despite all of this, a spokesperson from Obama's office released this statement just before today's evidence was declassified.
Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response.
But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one.
These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.
I think it's a disservice to the American people that former President Obama's office and others who are criticizing the transparency that is being delivered by releasing these documents.
They are doing a disservice to the American people and trying to deflect away from their culpability.
Tulsi even took the opportunity to tell the mainstream media to their faces that they knowingly published the Russia collusion lie and were complicit in these treasonous crimes.
They conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016.
They worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump.
And reporters at legacy outlets, some of which are sitting in this room today, like the New York Times and the Washington Post, were ridiculously awarded Pulitzer Prizes for their perpetuation of this hoax.
It's well past time for those awards to be stripped from the journalists who receive them.
Remember when the liberal media was repeating this over and over and over again?
Russia hacking the election to elect Trump.
What is the end of our democracy?
Russians definitively hacked the election.
Russia did hack the election.
No doubt.
The Russians hacked the election.
Yes, Russia hacked the election.
In fact, Russia hacked the election.
President-elect Donald Trump still not sounding convinced that Russia hacked the election.
The president does not want to come to terms with the fact that the Russians hacked the election.
President Trump says he still wonders if, if the Russians hacked the election.
If you can get them to accept that Russia hacked the election, see if you can get them to accept who won the civil war.
And with all of their lies exposed, none of that keeps the fake news, especially today with CNN from pushing their false narratives.
CNN's Caitlin Collins made no hesitation to hit below the belt, suggesting Gabbard, a former Democrat, is only releasing these reports to boost her standing with Trump.
What would you say to people who believe that you're only releasing these documents now to improve your standing with the president after he said that your intelligence assessments were wrong?
Who was saying that, that she would release this to try to boost her standing with the president?
Who has said that?
Well, the president has publicly undermined her when it came to Iran.
He said she was wrong.
He told me that she didn't know what she was talking about.
That was on Air Force One on camera.
The only people who are suggesting that the Director of National Intelligence would release evidence to try to boost her standing with the president are the people in this room who constantly try to sow distrust and chaos amongst the president's cabinet.
And it is not working.
Reporters like Collins will stoop to the lowest level, even if it means embarrassing themselves on the world stage.
In fact, another reporter from CNN, Jeff Zelaney, said after the briefing that we shouldn't really spend so much time on this subject.
I mean, this is hardly information that we should even be repeating.
Never mind that it's, you know, some years after the fact, eight years more than that after the fact, but also just to look at the source.
But look, this is what this White House wants to talk about, and I'm not sure that we should spend that much more time on it, frankly.
The lack of coverage on this issue speaks volumes.
CNN is so desperate to hide this information from the public that they even cut away from Gabbard as she was speaking.
Russia had neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the U.S. election.
On December 5th.
We've been listening there to the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, continuing on what has now been a multi-day effort.
Please Pittsburgh happen to see here.
This is yet another bad day for the mainstream media's credibility.
But a huge question remains.
Are there still bad actors within the intelligence community?
Are there still infiltrators sabotaging Trump's efforts to hold Obama and his cabinet members accountable?
This could very well be the reason for the current Epstein cover-up that many Trump supporters view the DOJ as handling poorly.
Perhaps there's a connection here we're not seeing quite yet, but time will tell.
Reporting for Lindell TV, I'm Allison Steinberg.
Allison, that was an excellent report.
I am extremely impressed at how well done that was, how tight it was, how powerful it was.
That report, although it would have to be changed just a little bit, would have been when I was trying cases and you put that together, you'd go right to the top of my list as one of my best assistant U.S. attorneys who could prosecute people and convict them.
Man, you made that understandable and easy.
And what idiots you made out of.
No, I'm sorry.
You know, I wish we had a chance to talk about this, Allison.
We go too easy on them when we say they're idiots.
These people are as, the people who do this, like that Caitlin woman, who's getting to look meaner and meaner.
They do this.
They do this for evil reasons.
These are all people that even if they were educated in these in these make-believe Ivy League schools, they did.
I mean, they still are people with basic raw intelligence.
And they just repeat this stuff.
How can you hang on to a Pulitzer Prize, for example, when you reported for two and a half to three years a totally, completely false story?
Not only a false story, but one that was manufactured and paid for in order to fool you.
And the best we can say about you is that you are a stupid, ignorant reporter who bought it or a co-conspirator.
I don't think anyone should accept a Pulitzer Prize from now on.
I was a nominee in 2001 for the Nobel Peace Prize because of my stabilizing New York City on September 11.
I don't know who won it that year.
I never thought I would get it after all, despite the fact that they changed the kind of feeling about me.
I was still, as I think Sean Hannity will tell you, the most conservative mayor in the history of the city of New York.
And although a lot of people didn't realize it in the Republican Party, Which hurt me when I ran for president.
Everybody in the Democratic Party realized it.
I would say there are a couple of governors that I would give equal, I would say, Governor Thompson, and I borrowed from them.
But of the mayors, I was probably the most conservative mayor in the history of America.
But I had one issue that made me to some of the very extreme right-wing is not persona non-grata.
I was partially pro-choice.
I say partially pro-choice, and then they would accuse me of being dishonest because I would say I am pro-life personally, but I have a compromise that I have to offer to my fellow citizens because I don't control America with my religion.
And that is, you know, abortion under circumstances where you have to make a choice.
And I always favored giving women in that terrible situation the option of adoption.
And I created a program like that in New York City, which raised the number of adoptions dramatically.
Well, I'm just going back.
I don't know why am I doing that.
I shouldn't.
Nothing wrong with that, Mayor.
Nah, we're going way back.
But the fact is that this is maybe the most important story in terms of the ability of our country to continue to move inexorably toward a more perfect.
The most important set of facts that have happened in our history in the recent years.
No group of American political people, Democrats, Republicans, scoundrels, crooks, mafia, has attempted to undermine our republic the way the Democrats of the Obama-Biden era did.
The Democrat Party should cast it aside the way they cast.
Well, do they cast aside their history as the major proponent for slavery in America?
I find it completely absurd that we're arguing over titles like Washington Redskins, the Cleveland Indians, Massapequa Chiefs.
And we maintain the title Democrat Party.
I don't know.
A chief seems like a pretty damn nice thing to me.
You're the chief of a tribe.
Indian is what they were called mistakenly, but still, I mean, a lot of people are named mistakenly, but there's a history to it.
We kind of deny our history when we don't, when we do away with that word.
We can make believe that history didn't exist.
And it really is a, it really does have something to do with understanding the evolvement of our understanding of the world, because it comes out of our still confusion about the world being round.
Do you realize how ignorant the people are who propound all of this stuff from the top of the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal?
Now, I don't know what the Wall Street Journal is doing now with this so-called sort of letter that went back and forth between Trump and Epstein 2,000 years ago.
This letter, first of all, if we put it in context, you should realize that this letter goes back to before any of this emerged with Epstein.
I don't remember when it is, but it's before he was arrested, before it was brought out that he was with young people or even in some kind of prostitution business.
So if Trump had written this letter with him, it wouldn't have really meant anything.
He'd just have been another jerk or pal that he was hanging around with like me or like George Steinbrenner.
And I got to tell you, he was hanging around with me and George Steinbrenner a lot more than that creep.
The guy, I got to know, ever want to be interviewed about my relationship with Trump, which may or may not interest you.
A lot of it has to do with George Steinbrenner.
And even my views of Donald as a young man, George had great respect for him.
And George felt he was going to really go.
I don't know that he ever said he would be president.
He may have.
And probably also said that I'd be president too.
So you can see he wasn't the greatest predictor.
But he sure had great respect for Donald.
And he had great respect for Donald beyond his business acumen.
George was very interested in politics.
As you know, he got in trouble supporting Nixon, right?
He was a conservative of.
You know what he was really?
I don't know if he was a conservative.
That's true.
But he also had a bit, coming from Cleveland and all, he had a little bit of a Democratic twin.
He was like I was, kind of a Democratic thing to him, too.
He's a patriot.
George was born on the 4th of July.
And wow.
I never forgot it.
I love this country so much.
I don't even want to think about how exciting that would be for him.
He had a big impact on Donald, and somebody should write about that sometimes who's a better writer than I am.
So today we also completed two major deals they never thought were going to get done.
Screw them.
Why do we pay attention to the Wall Street Journal or any of these people who are Tariff nuts.
We have a deal now with Japan, who's, I don't know, third, fourth biggest trading partner, right?
Not only is Japan, these two deals, which are and Philippines, by the way, are beyond trade deals.
These deals are national security deals.
These are two countries.
These two countries here, these are my little articles that I mark up.
See, Trump does this too.
See this?
This is what you learn in Catholic school.
So these articles basically come out with a deal that is fabulous for us.
First of all, you know, if you know the history of Japan, you know, Japan has never really opened up Japan.
Never.
They finally did it.
We're finally open to being able to buy anything we want in Japan.
We weren't.
Up until now, there were restrictions on what we could buy in Japan.
Even now, even with the tremendous love they have for us, and they do, you should know, because I've been in Japan eight times.
That's probably more than most people, right?
And I went to Japan and the first two times, didn't like it.
I'm a convert.
And I had a wrong impression of the people because I wasn't able to relate to them.
The minute I started relating to them, wow.
What great people?
Solid, solid people.
They all seem to have been graduates of West Point.
They've got morals and they have decency and they have rules and they have ethics and family values.
Don't get me in trouble.
I don't see any Italians around here.
Ted's not Italian.
Everybody thinks about Italians with great family values.
The Japanese are certainly a competitor.
Wow.
That means a lot to them.
They'll go back 200 years ago to Uncle Yamo Min, or I may have that, you know, who did it's just beautiful.
And when you see it and you get over your inability to deal with it because it's in a different language and a different alphabet, you get beyond that.
And now with these apps that exist where you can translate immediately, it's really much easier to do that.
What you see are a remarkable group of people.
Wow.
There's a reason that small island has been able to maintain its independence against a gigantic China.
Not only does it maintain its independence against gigantic China, it pushes it around.
So this deal with Japan and China, which ends up with, sometimes it's hard to figure out in these deals what the rate's going to be, but it looks like it's entirely reciprocal.
Or even when it's not reciprocal, it's acceptable.
It may be some areas where they don't mind a higher tariff or where we don't and we'd rather have it someplace else.
These trade deals are extraordinarily complex and they require people who really are experts on it.
And what Trump has done, which no other American president has ever done, because no American president ever really understood trade unless we go back to Theodore Roosevelt or someone, is he's gotten the experts in who know how to make that.
You get the experts in from Japan, the experts from America.
The Americans can tell the Japanese, you know, it's better for you if you, and the Japanese can do it with us.
You know, we've been screwing you for years.
Let me explain to you.
If you make this little change, it's going to be a lot better for you.
So Trump has accomplished something that was in our history books, and that is he finally opened Japan completely.
Who else would do it but Trump, right?
And the deal with the Philippines is a fabulous one.
And why is that important?
What's our alliance against China?
Who are we going to count on against China?
England's far away.
Even Israel's far away.
We're going to count on Japan, right?
We're going to count on the Philippines.
We're going to count on Taiwan.
We're going to count on South Korea.
And we're working really hard to count on Vietnam.
We put that and a few more things together.
And China might as well just go back to being a regional something.
We're going to take a short break.
Is that okay?
We're going to end the show.
Nope.
Actually, Mayor, we're a minute away from ending the show.
So send everybody over to X. Oh, I had such a good time.
That's right.
It goes so.
Can I show them as we're going out?
We're going to go over to X. When we go over to X, we're going to cover the story I don't want to cover because it's disgusting and it makes me sick to my stomach, the Epstein story.
But it's about time to cover it because it's starting to be used now like the Russian collusion thing.
And we got to stop it.
We got to cut it out.
And we're also going to talk a little about Ukraine and what's going on there because I think there's some critical things happening there.
But you go over to X. We'll be continuing on X. So go over right now and in between quick, but maybe not so quick, whatever amount of time you want to devote to praying for Israel, Ukraine, Iran, United States of America, and our president.
Okay.
We'll see you tomorrow night.
▲
Export Selection