All Episodes
Previous Next
July 22, 2025 - Rudy Giuliani
01:49:28
America's Mayor Live (717)—President Trump on Russia Hoax Findings: "Obama’s Been Caught Directly"
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening.
This is Rudy Giuliani, and this is America's Mayor Live.
That's right.
From Dover, New Hampshire.
Live free or die.
What do you think, Ted?
You like that symbol?
That slogan?
I do, and we're going to play a short video here.
This is where we are.
This was filmed by our colleague Stephen.
Oh, good, good.
Oh, you have the one from the drone?
The one you didn't have.
I have the drone footage, man.
This is the first time the mayor is seeing it.
Maybe we should even say that.
We could get, who knows about these drone things.
Right.
Let's make sure we, yeah, we, uh, this is, this is where we, Yep, this is where we are.
I feel a very per you know, it's like.
Well, that's it.
That's what we look out on.
That's what we look out on from the back.
Right.
So you, you're.
This is kind of zoom.
Oh.
So these are some different shots here.
So this is the actual pro that's sort of the property with the pond.
Yep.
That's coming in on us.
But now we're coming in on where we are right now.
You'll have to do a little narrating because the camera gets in the way of my seeing some of it.
So that's the property from a distance.
This is what it looks like in the morning.
Isn't that nice?
That's why I'm able to do such good analysis.
Now, this is looking the other way.
This is looking back at where.
Where we're up there in the corner.
Right.
Now it's coming in on us.
Here it is, coming in on us.
We'll have to get more of these.
Maybe I'll see what else Stephen has for us, but that's.
Yeah, we'll do other ones.
There it is.
Okay.
So that's that is our little piece of Dover.
The town itself is quite a beautiful little town or big town, nice town.
We went in today.
I went in today to see the dentist.
You should have seen what I look like this morning.
One of those was missing.
I was going to keep it there because I've always wanted to be a character actor.
And I thought maybe I could get a part in a movie, but the Chinese would keep me out because they control Hollywood because I would play a movie in which I was either, we were either combating Chinese and stopping them from trying to take over, or if I wanted, or I'd play a Chinese villain if you wanted.
I mean, just to, in order, if nobody else did.
I mean, I'm more than willing to play a Chinese villain who spreads COVID all over the world and kills people, something like that, or infiltrates American universities so that there are, so they teach Marxism.
So there's been a lot of a national conversation about two things.
Epstein, and we're going to cover that.
I just did that on the other show, so I'm going to do that toward the end here.
But also about Zoron Mandami.
So I'm going to, if you don't think this is dangerous, there's something wrong with you.
It's not a joke, this Zolron Mandami stuff.
And okay, I have a little special interest in it because he wants the job that I once held.
And I don't think I ever imagined, and I imagined the worst, I should tell you when I was the mayor and making the changes that I made.
And I will not waste any time with being falsely modest, which were greater than probably any mayor in American history with the possible exception of my hero LaGuardia.
And as I was making those changes, and I saw, and I'll illustrate it to you this way, so we do it real quick.
So about a year before I came in for mayor, Time magazine had a cover that said, the rotting of the big apple.
And that was under my Democrat predecessor who defeated me by 1% or 2% the first time I ran, named David Dinkins, who at that time appeared to be the worst mayor in New York history.
Not even going to be close when they get finished with what they're doing now.
He won very close.
It was a point or two.
And I ran for mayor a second time.
I was going to move on and run for something else because Republican has such a difficult chance in New York.
And I got something like 47, 48.
I got the largest percentage of the vote than any Republican had gotten since LaGuardia.
Even Lindsay, who got elected, got elected in a three-way race where he had only 42%.
So one of my good friends, Alin Specter, who you may remember, the senator from Pennsylvania, said, Rudy, this is like, consider this like money in the bank and figure out when to cash it in.
I mean, getting 47, 48% of the vote in New York is quite an accomplishment.
Don't feel bad that you lost.
And maybe you want to cash it in for the Senate or for governor, because there, look, at that time, we had two, we had a Republican senator and a Democratic senator.
We had Republican governors and Democratic governors.
The state was not as blue as it is now, and now it's going back again.
But in any event, it was the city.
And if you could get a reasonable number in the city, you could win the state.
So I lost and I watched David Dinkins and he was a terrible mayor.
I mean, no other way to say it, terrible and dishonest.
The dishonest part, the press Will always protect him because he was the first black mayor, but he did a pretty damn good job of selling his community out and never doing a damn thing for it.
He's one of the reasons why the Harlem never went anywhere until I helped to change it and bring in businesses and get rid of the people who were committing enormous numbers of crimes and get rid of the people who were doing illegal selling so that no legitimate business would be there and get rid of the bums that were being put into the hospital system and elsewhere by Charlie Wrangell and people like that.
Nobody cared about the people of Harlem.
All those guys cared about was they all made millions.
If that had gone to the people, the place would have been Monaco.
So now we got something I never thought in my lifetime I would ever see.
We got a straight out and out, and this is a double barrel shot.
We got a guy who's sympathetic with Islamic extremism, terrorism, and murder.
He is sure as hell, I'm being kind by saying sympathetic.
He is virulently a Jew hater in a very large Jewish city.
He's anti-Semitic in a way that and he's a communist.
He can say all he wants that he's not, but I mean, if you're telling me that the city is going to take over the supermarkets, and we're going to have city supermarkets to provide our food, and we're going to raise taxes on the rich, and we're losing rich people more than any city in America right now.
Hey, asshole, you're not going to have any rich left.
I mean, you're not even like a new communist that uses the switch to racism as the point of antagonism or colonialism and oppression.
You're an old-fashioned economic communist.
Plus that.
So, I mean, anybody that wants to say you're not a communist is a fool.
Uneducated, uninformed, brainwashed fool.
You have taken the positions that a doctrinaire, atheistic, Marxist, freaking insane communist would take.
So there's no doubt what you are.
Here's the problem.
Looks like one of you just got nominated in Minneapolis over a mayor.
I don't know, the guy should go to reform school or something, no, not reform school.
He should go to grow up school.
That's Mayor Fry, the boy mayor of Minneapolis, who probably did the singularly most damaging thing during the Floyd riots in giving up a police precinct.
The minute a mayor gives up a police precinct, the next thing he should do is resign.
In Japan, he'd probably have to commit suicide.
When I heard, I don't even know who this fry is.
I used to see him on television.
He looked like he was like a kindergarten teacher or something.
And he sounded like one.
But when he gave up the police precinct, the moment he did that, I said, this thing is going to ignite all over the country.
All the Soros people and all the communist types and Black Lives Matter cop killers and all they have to do is see that.
And man, this is, give up a police precinct.
They'd have to kill me if I'm the mayor.
There'd be no way in anybody's imagination that if they took a police precinct, I'd be alive after.
They all be dead or I'd be alive.
One or the other.
They're my cops.
You're not taking over a police precinct.
I'm sorry.
You don't run the city.
Black Lives Matter doesn't run the city.
Soros doesn't run the city.
He may pay people to run it, but he doesn't.
You do, little boy fry.
And then Tampon Tim, who I hardly knew then, I didn't realize he appears to be an agent of the Chinese communist government, was packing him up completely.
This was a complete sellout of America.
I don't know, this guy's not left enough for you.
Fry is not left enough for you?
So they elect this guy named Omar Fetter.
I pronounce it as Fatah, but that's the crooked group that runs the West Bank in Palestine, Fatah.
They are the former Palestinian liberation organization that theoretically went nonviolent, but totally crooked, which is what they are now.
They steal every penny that we have sent for 25 years to Palestine so that Mrs. Arafat plus others can live in the southern part of France as multi-billionaires.
But state senator Omar Fetta, he spells it with an E rather than an A, F A T E H, as opposed to F A T A H, which is Fatah.
So he's running, they very Delicately say in this article, I'm not even sure where I got this article, but it's like a, this is like a soft left-wing article with a lot of empathy for Islamic extremists.
The two-term incumbent mayor, Fry, and his supporters, argue that the city convention endorsement process was flawed.
Gee, an election in Minneapolis is flawed.
Breaking news.
Who once said that?
The breaking news alert.
It's flawed.
Like when they cheated Bernie out of the nomination, right?
And Bernie didn't have the balls to fight because he's a silly.
He's a silly, Ted.
There's somebody for you there, Ted.
So I don't know what happened, but this is like a vote of the Democrat Pharma Labor Party, which always used to be too left-wing.
And I don't have no idea why they have to have a Democratic Pharma Labor Party in Minneapolis and in Minnesota.
And it can't be part of the Democrat.
Maybe they don't want to be part of the party of slavery.
It might be actually a good thing.
So the counting of the first round voting took almost two hours to complete.
Two hours?
I mean, in Pennsylvania, they take five days.
But I guess this is a convention they're counting.
Right.
FETA, FETI, FETA, the more extreme one, had 44% of the vote to Fry's 31.5.
So they were the only two in contention for the endorsement.
So now I don't know how they arrived then at the endorsement.
It doesn't say.
But the party endorsed Feta.
So the Mandami Islamic Extremist Sympathizer is now the nominee.
And the crazy, insane, cowardly lion, baby, idiot mayor who helped to create riots all over the country is not left enough for them.
He's kind of fighting and claiming all kinds of fraud and skullduggery on the part of the Islamic people.
But the Mandami thing is spreading.
That's the point of the story.
You could have two communist soft on Islamic extremist group mayors in New York and in Minneapolis.
Now, don't tell me that Mandou Midami isn't soft on Islamic extremist terrorism.
He does everything he can to promote Hamas, enough to the point where the idea of investigating him and prosecuting him is not at all irresponsible, although the press will make it that way, won't they?
Now, I mean, Madami has no regard for the law.
That doesn't mean anything to him.
And I really do think he could be disqualified from office, from running for office.
And the Republican Party of Manhattan, I guess, one of the Republican groups, apparently is suing him.
But here's what they're basing it on, that he's going to be lawless and therefore violate his oath of office, which, by the way, if you can prove it, is a reason for disqualifying someone.
So, number one, he repeatedly threatens to arrest Prime Minister Netanyahu.
He has absolutely no, that would be an illegal arrest.
The International Court of Justice is not recognized in the United States.
Now, this may not bother him because he works for other countries or other terrorist groups, and the United States means nothing to him.
But that would be called illegal and a violation of his oath of office, which he's announcing he's going to do before he even becomes mayor, which may be a reason why you could disqualify him.
He violates almost every day the American Service Members Protection Act of 2001, which prohibits any local government from cooperating with the ICC,
which it appears as if the ICC is in a court of justice, international criminal court, which is what he's doing when he says that he will not allow Netanyahu in the city.
Mondami wants to shift the tax burdens, and he said this, into wider neighborhoods.
Did you ever hear discrimination?
Racism?
You can't allocate taxes based on the color of a person's skin.
That's illegal, like a violation, again, of your oath of office.
He also wants to seize property from wayward landlords, whatever the hell that means, through a public foreclosure process after he doubles and triples code violation fines.
Sounds like a violation of taking a property without due process.
I mean, I could list 20 violations of federal law that he's announced and federal constitution that he is announcing as part of his program, which leads up to the ability to Have a court disqualify him from running.
And I don't know if a court would or would not.
After all, we're talking about the crooked New York court system, which is, you know, he may be a communist, but they're crooked as hell.
And they're probably more than willing to make a deal with him.
I mean, they're going to determine it based on the county leader who put them into their judgeship.
And he's going to be a Democrat.
And he's going to tell them how to vote.
As you'll see later on on the show, we've got some pretty extraordinary examples of New York corruption.
So he's being challenged.
I don't know if this lawsuit's been filed yet or it's about to be filed, but he's being challenged and they're going to try to disqualify him from the ballot.
I think in crooked New York, with the crooked New York courts, where honesty and a legal just decision is the exception, and it would happen only in a completely non-political case, or maybe a case where you haven't reached the judge with Moolah Moolah.
And this would not be, this would be a political case.
I think the chance of getting a straight decision here is about zero.
But it isn't a bad way to illustrate these things about this guy.
He also is selling out without any doubt the future of the children of New York, particularly the minority children, by being willing to give up mayoral control of the schools.
This was something that a group of bipartisan mayors worked on for years.
It may have been Koch, who was the first one who argued for it, and then Dinkins, and then me.
And then Bloomberg was able to obtain it.
And even de Blasio kept it.
Giving it up would be a terrible mistake because you would be giving it to the Communist Teachers Union, which is the biggest enemy of school children in America, particularly the union that exists in New York City.
Children are pawns in their desire for money, very little work, and their ideology.
It is a single biggest reason why the New York City school system is such a failure.
Maybe the only reason.
The teachers' union is depraved.
And this idea that, oh, teachers are really wonderful, but it's a teachers' union.
It's about time they quit.
That's like saying, you know.
Well, I don't know.
The Nazi prison guards?
I mean, the teachers' union is horrible.
Out in orders.
It's horrible.
I mean, did it take, did it really take the pandemic and they are keeping those children in mass for an extra year and out of school for an extra year because they're a bunch of.
Do you know how much the performance of the children has declined since I was mayor?
Even with mayoral control, because honestly, Bloomberg and who today, somebody in one of the newspapers said did a great job with the schools.
He actually didn't do a great job with the schools.
And he had the power to do it.
And if he did, they declined.
Even though he put more money in.
We're putting two, two and a half times more money in, and our scores have declined by even more than that.
And you can almost do a chart, which I will, I have done in the past, and I can show it to you again.
You can almost do a chart where because the money is being put in to pay off the teachers' union, it's almost in direct proportion to each other, except opposite.
The more money that goes in, the more the scores drop.
So here you're here, put more money in, scores go that way.
until you're here and you've about doubled on that chart maybe tripled from the time i left Meaning the kids are going to hell and the teachers' union couldn't give.
They didn't care if those kids were locked up in classrooms or locked up behind.
Did you ever consider that kids sniffle?
I mean, oh, come on.
If I have to convince you that the teachers' union is something that should be broken up, they began as a communist union.
They've always been a communist union.
And Mandami wants to give the communists control of the school system.
And people want to fight over whether he's a communist or not.
Worst part of it is he's a communist with great sympathies for Islamic terrorism.
And he's a completely inexperienced, fairly uneducated jackass.
What was his major?
Go figure out his major in college.
So the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which was intended to prevent, I mean, if they're going to use the, if they're going to use all this Confederate stuff on birthright citizenship, maybe we can use it for this.
The 14th Amendment prevents Confederates from re-entering public office after the Civil War.
It allows Congress to remove anyone who engaged in insurrection or rebellion or has given aid and comfort to our enemies.
Has Mandami given aid and comfort to Amas?
Sure as hell has.
Sure as hell has.
They're not gonna want to face it, but he sure but maybe we should make the issue He also is a um He also is in favor of a minimum wage that would completely bankrupt New York City.
So California, he wants a minimum wage, if I'm correct, of $30.
Cuomo wants a minimum wage of $20 because Cuomo is ass looking and trying to act like he's like the responsible Islamic terrorist lover or the responsible communist or whatever the hell he is.
He's none of those things.
He's just a phony.
And already, most of the old people have left New York, just on the idea that he may become a mayor, they want to go to someplace where they have a decent chance of living a few extra years.
So here's an example that I guess it was the Wall Street Journal pointed out today.
So California moved its minimum wage up to $20 an hour, which is the one Cuomo wants, not the $30 that the communist Mondami wants.
Now, should anybody be bothered to look at facts or examples, which I would do constantly when I tried to figure out what was right to do for the city?
How about we look at what California did?
Since they've put in their $20 an hour minimum wage, there are 18,000 fewer fast food jobs.
18,000!
They moved it from 16 to 20 in April of 2024, and they've lost 18,000 jobs.
Basically, the range in different parts of California in the drop in employment in the fast food industry is 2.3 to 3.9%.
Even as employment in other sectors of the California economy track national standards.
And there have been more losses since, which they're going to report to us shortly.
And they believe that this is understated.
The idea that minimum wages decrease employment is far from new.
And perhaps to some readers, this study sounds like a mundane dog bites man story.
Yet today's political debate is full of magical thinking.
The Democratic Party socialist nominee for New York Mayor, Zolron Mondani, has called for increasing the city's minimum wage to $30.
So we should lose even more jobs.
Andrew Cuomo, his supposedly more moderate competitor, wants a $20 minimum.
These guys will never learn because they don't want to see the world as it really is.
No, they really will say anything to get votes because they are political prostitutes.
So shall we take a break?
And we'll be right back.
U.S. Army Major Scott Smiley paid a high price serving our nation.
Scott was leading his platoon in Iraq when a blast sent shrapnel through his eyes, leaving him blind and temporarily paralyzed.
Scott would become the first blind, active duty military officer before medically retiring years later.
Thanks to friends like you, the Tunnels and Towers Foundation gave Scott and his family a mortgage-free, specially adapted smart home.
Show your support for America's heroes.
Now, donate $11 a month to Tunnels of Towers at T2.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action!
Get the Elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month, including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports.
Movies.
News.
Even daytime drama.
We're talking about ESPNOAN newsmax.
Channels you can't get any more in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to QUXNow.com and get yours today.
Use promo code Rudy.
These deals are selling out.
Here we are, pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
Not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers, but they'd like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
They're going to go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so.
Oh, my goodness.
Look at these.
my goodness They're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
We're back.
You know, things in New York, this is Rudy Giuliani back again on America's Mayor Live.
We've been talking about Mondami and this other guy, Fet Fet.
I can't pronounce, I want to say Feta because it's like the crooked party in Palestine, the Fatah Party, that used to be a terrorist party, but they turned into massive organized crime crooks.
Oh, they probably still do a little murder here and there.
But Feta is the Mandami of Minneapolis, and he's replacing the boy mayor Fry, who gave up the police precinct.
And why that isn't good enough, I don't know.
I mean, you probably, you got to be like a hero to the left if you gave up a police precinct.
And to me, I don't know what to call you.
But in any event, you know, New York has it bad enough even without these crazy communists.
So the other day, the other day, Judge Valentina Morales, who is affectionately known in the New York Post as Let Him Go Morales,
dropped a case against a pro demonstrator, pro-Hamas demonstrator, who threw a rock at an pro-Israeli demonstrator.
So you'd agree that, you know, First Amendment allows you to protest, but it says nothing about trying to kill somebody by throwing a rock at their skull, right?
Like that's, it doesn't matter if you're protesting or you're not.
If you throw a rock at somebody with the intent to harm them, it's a serious crime, right?
Okay.
So the way this bum, Zudi Ahmed, was caught was facial recognition.
They had some kind of a shot of him, and then they had publicly sourced photos of him at the high school.
They compared the two, they found him, and they got him.
And he's the guy who did it.
And the chip was provided by an FDNY fire marshal.
The judge dismissed the case and let him go home to practice, I guess, his throwing so he can next time maybe kill somebody.
That's Valentina, let him go, Morales, let him go.
Because she says that this was, I don't know, she made it up, unconstitutional.
Nothing unconstitutional at all about a public photograph.
The minute you're out in public, you've given up the expectation of privacy.
If she ever read a Supreme Court decision, which I doubt, she'd understand the whole concept of expectation of privacy and what that means.
Because we really don't have a right to privacy.
It's sort of created out of the penumbras of the Constitution, which gets you back to Justice Douglas and Griswold against Connecticut and eventually the Role Against Wade decision.
But in any event, it has been clear under American and English law forever and ever that what happens in public, you don't have any expectation of privacy like that couple that got caught, you know.
They're in public.
I mean, this has gone out of your way to let a possible murderer go free.
Now, why do I say possible murderer?
Many you throw a rock, you don't know what's going to happen with that rock.
Hit somebody's brain in the wrong way, and you got a murder on your hands.
So maybe it would have been a good idea if Zudi Ahmed spent a little time in jail so we'd reflect on the fact that, you know, it's baseballs we throw to catchers and basketballs we try to put in nets, not rocks that we throw at Jewish people.
And maybe somebody should remove Valentina and let him go Morales.
Who the hell appointed her in the first place?
Thank God it wasn't me.
How about this?
So Donald White went to trial.
And he was convicted of murder.
He was convicted of murder.
You know why the appellate division reversed his case?
Please, don't get out of your chair.
Because his buddy, friend who was attending the court proceeding, was thrown out of the court by the judge because he was sleeping.
And the appellate division determined that was denial of a public trial.
Well, first of all, you don't have a right to be tried in front of sleeping people.
I mean, I can't imagine when they had the right to a fair trial, the right to a public trial, they meant 14 people snoring in the courtroom.
Now, did these people go to law school?
Betsy Barrows, Barry Warhit, Lords Ventura, and Donna Maria Golia, they don't deny that the weight of the evidence backs a guilty verdict, which generally would lead to a conclusion of harmless error.
And it really had to be harmless to the outcome of the trial That his sleeping friend was thrown out.
I mean, how did that have a bearing on whether he got a fair trial or he didn't get a fair trial?
His friend snoring in the back.
When I tell you that the New York City court system is flaming, unbelievable desecration to the idea of American law, please don't think I'm exaggerating.
This decision is insane.
This is insane.
I don't know.
These people should be examined.
The guy is found guilty of murder.
They don't deny that the weight of the evidence backs the guilty verdict.
But his buddy, who's watching the trial, is sleeping.
And the judge says, please get out of here if you're sleeping.
Maybe he was snoring.
How do I know?
Isn't this just you love criminals?
Ted, I mean, you want to look at it to make sure I don't have it wrong?
Maybe there's something wrong with the reporting of it.
We'll go check.
I mean, this, look, they don't let you really, I mean, the decision, for example, of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court on whether people should be present to examine ballots was equally insane, except it didn't involve murder.
It didn't involve a presidency.
I mean, the stuff we put up with from these judges is, and you know, we're not supposed to criticize them.
I don't know where that, whoever said that, you're not supposed to criticize a judge.
Where does that happen in the First Amendment?
Is they're like, you have a right of free speech, you have a right to petition the government, but you can't say anything bad about a judge.
And they make you pay for it if you do.
Man, I mean, I'm glad I can tell you about that because if I told you about my own stories, you'd think I'd make it up.
I mean, I watched the impossible in my own cases.
what a group of criminals I mean, you get that?
Maybe there's something wrong.
I'm going to go back and read.
I'm going to read this.
I'm going to go back and read the case, okay?
And if it's any difference, if there's any explanation for that, I'll give it to you tomorrow.
But I really doubt it because I shouldn't act like that's unusual.
This is what passes for justice in New York for the last 150 years.
And you should know that this is all supported by all the fancy New York lawyers, the Bar Association.
They just let it go on.
So the judge in the Harvard case, where Harvard is trying to get out of the sanctions that the Trump administration is placing on them for hating Jews and treating Jews horribly, she looks like she's siding with the people who appointed her.
You surprised?
She's a Democrat.
So she doesn't know how the government can equate denying money with demonstrations of anti-Semitism.
It's called you don't want to give money to a school that violates the United States Constitution, jackass judge, crooked judge, Democrat judge, turncoat Jew, which says you're Jewish.
And you don't give a shit.
They got people calling about eliminating the Jewish people.
And you're doing this crap in court because you're a Democrat?
What the hell is wrong with you?
Burroughs, who said she's Jewish and agreed that there were some missteps on campus, but she wanted the government to connect the concerns about anti-Semitism with the cancellation of funds.
You should not support an anti-Semitic institution, judge.
Taxpayer money should not be given to Jew haters.
Taxpayer money should not be given to Jew haters.
The government isn't required to give money to schools.
You can say if it's going to stop doing it, it better have a good reason.
How about hating Jews?
is a pretty damn good reason.
Thank you.
Harvard won't even give the government any information.
So it could make a, it can, I mean, you don't need to give them information.
You got the damn videos.
We were at Harvard.
The official policy of Harvard, from everything you can tell if you're at those demonstrations, they hate the Jewish people.
And the Harvard Jews who are demonstrating with them, you know, belong to a group like Schumer, who can't stand up for the Jewish people.
I'm sorry, every group has Quizlings.
Not just Jewish people.
They had Italians who did that.
They had Germans who did that.
they have lots of people who do that.
Why should the government be forced to give money to a school that violates one of the basic precepts that makes America a nation and a civilization and a country?
Which is no discrimination based on race, religion, ethnic background, where that discrimination turns often into violence.
I mean, it's you look at that decision.
You look at the decision where they let a guy off.
They let a guy off for murder because his buddy falls asleep in the courtroom and they throw him out.
What does that have to do with murder?
You look at the case they threw out against Zudi Ahmed, who's throwing rocks at people who are Jewish because they use facial recognition.
They took pictures of them.
You're allowed to take pictures of people in public.
There's no, you know, there's no, once you go, there's a whole group of decisions in the Supreme Court that talk about expectation of privacy.
It's a very rational thought if you think about it, right?
If you're inside your house, unless you've turned it over to photographers or whatever, this would be an interesting thing.
I'm doing a public thing here.
So this would be the wrong example, although this would be a close one.
Suppose Ted is in his apartment, or I'm in my apartment.
I'm in my apartment upstairs.
Okay?
I have an expectation, Ted, in that apartment, that people are not going to come and take pictures.
And if you do, you violate my privacy.
The minute I won the DAC, even though I'm on private property, that expectation of privacy ends because people can take pictures of me.
Gets a little closer if I'm still on my property.
Now, here's where I have no expectation of privacy.
I get off my property and I'm in the middle of Dover and I'm walking around.
Anybody can take a picture of me, which means anybody can take a facial image of me.
And I may not like, I mean, you know, I don't mind pictures being taken, but I get an awful lot of pictures taken of me.
And sometimes they get pictures of taken me when I'm making a funny face.
And I don't like it.
Nothing I can do about it.
But I don't get pictures of me taken when I'm throwing rocks to try to kill Jewish people.
Right.
Where does this son of a bitch get the right to have a right of privacy so he can't use facial recognition when he's throwing rocks at people's heads?
Yeah.
Judge Valentina Morales, you stink.
That's terrible.
Get out.
Please.
You're a disgrace to American justice, like the other ridiculous judges who reverse a case because a guy's buddy falls asleep in the courtroom and the judge throws him out.
What the hell does that have to do with whether he committed murder or not?
Nothing.
Well, let's get back to what's going to happen in Ukraine.
I don't know.
So Lindsey Graham used one of his South Carolina expressions.
He told, he was on Fox the other day and he said that Trump is going to put a whooping on Putin.
Well, okay, let's do it.
Right.
He also apologized for the Israeli attack on the Holy Family Church.
But he did it in an, he did it.
He said, I'm incredibly upset by that.
I'm an unapologetic supporter of the state of Israel.
I want to find out who did it, and I want them to be punished.
And if it was settlers from the West Bank, I want them to be punished.
Well, I don't know who did it.
And I agree with him.
If it were done deliberately, they should be punished, whether they're Jewish or they're not Jewish or they're settlers or they're not.
If it is the IDF and its collateral damage in a war that's enormously complicated, not the first time a church was hit, probably by American troops in Germany.
So let's be careful and let's take a good look at it.
And if you want to make that a big issue, I'd like to hear 10 times more about the thousand Christians that were killed by the Syrians with the government that we apparently now are supporting not seeming to do very much about it and also allowing the Druze to get slaughtered.
So I'm big on protecting Christians because I think nobody pays attention to Christians.
And I'd like to get to the bottom of this.
But I don't want to get to the bottom of this if it's being used as a way of covering in Syria where they're getting close maybe to genocide, even according to the bishop there, the Greek Orthodox bishop.
So John Bolton, who I guess, I mean, John used to be a friend, and then he lied about me, and I, because he was being sloppy, and because he gets silly, people get to be children.
But he sort of, he wrote this article about Ukraine.
I don't understand it.
He says that the president wants out of Ukraine.
Reports that Mr. Trump would send long-range missiles to Ukraine proved incorrect.
And the Patriot decision, while justifiably welcomed by Kiev, is only temporary.
I don't remember the reports that he was going to send long-range missiles.
They've always been about patriots.
And this is a lot better than Biden did, who never let him use any of these.
Thank you.
He doesn't seem to like the idea that we're getting paid for them by NATO.
I don't know why that's offensive to Bolton.
He does say that the fundamental issue is Mr. Trump's ignoring of inadequate defense budgets.
Well, he did increase the defense budget, but I don't, I mean, there's something where I might agree with John somewhat.
For me, the defense budget can never be big enough.
I mean, if we would take a lot more money out of Medicaid, where you'll see the report that came out the other day where people are collecting two times and three times.
I mean, there's plenty of room to go where you're not going to hurt a single decent person.
In fact, you're going to make the program accountable and save it.
And that money should be put to defending us so that we have such a strong army that nobody would even think about attacking us.
And a president that'll use it.
I mean, I don't get this.
How you protect America if you're an isolationist?
I don't think you should be an interventionist either, but I do not understand how you protect America as an isolationist.
We're not going to get involved in anything.
We're not going to get involved.
Who won't get involved?
Well, then they push you all around.
I don't get it.
I don't understand what this big thing with being an isolationist is.
Isolationists would work if we were like an isolated continent.
Nobody ever came here and we never went anywhere.
We didn't buy anything from them.
They didn't sell anything to us.
And we just like they're like, we can be an isolationist from Mars if we want to be.
We don't have anything to do with Mars.
As far as we know, there are no people there, right?
But we don't send products to them.
They don't send products back to us.
As far as I know, their people don't come here.
As far as I know, I mean, some of them could be running for mayor now in places.
But how can you be an isolationist with Europe, South America, Africa?
It doesn't mean you have to get involved in every one of their wars.
It doesn't mean you have to become a crazy interventionist either.
Maybe there shouldn't be any such thing as an isolationist or interventionist, because the facts should determine what you are, as opposed to your presumed ingenious political ideology.
And then when you make yourself one of those, you interpret the facts all that way.
So John is an obsessive interventionist.
Trump used to say there isn't a war that he doesn't like.
I don't know if that's true.
But he does sort of lean over that way.
And from what I'm listening to from Tucker and people like that, they can't think their way through being isolationists.
And their premise is just as off-kilter as what we accuse the left of.
They're living in a fantasy world.
So if Mondami is living in a fantasy world with, you know, we can just give people everything they want and the money grows on trees.
The isolationists are living in a fantasy world if they think we can just ignore China and ignore Russia and ignore Iran, and they're not going to do damage to us.
And we're not going to get our people killed.
And we may very well eventually get taken over.
Because that's what they're trying to do.
Just read.
So unfortunately, at this moment, the president still tilts toward isolationism.
Don't know if that's true.
I don't think it is.
I think the president is exceedingly practical and very much common sense.
And I think he is not an isolationist.
And I don't think he's an interventionist.
You can't be an isolationist if you're going to use power if you have to to protect the United States.
Or then if you are, you're a certain kind of isolationist where you should make it clear that there are times when you will intervene.
Which gets me to the subject of something that we should know a lot more about.
And here it becomes unfortunate that Elon and the president had this falling out because Elon was really getting, this is one of the most important things Elon was getting to.
So...
Apparently the government has found, and according to the Wall Street Journal, you won't read it anywhere else.
I don't know, maybe you won't hear it anywhere else, but you can hear it here.
But the government found, now catch this, this is a big number.
2.8 million Americans are enrolled in two taxpayer-funded health plans.
You're not supposed to be, you're supposed to acknowledge the other one.
It's like getting welfare twice.
I'm a big expert on that, like three times and four times too.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reported late last week that 1.2 million Americans last year enrolled in Medicaid or the children's health insurance program in two or more states.
This is what they used to do with welfare in New York when I became mayor.
These are two different studies.
One or 2.8 are in two government-funded health plans.
Now, we go to Medicaid and Medicare, and 1.2 million are enrolled that they found in two or more states.
So it could be more than two.
You could have three, four.
That's what we had with Welfare.
We had people enrolled twice, three times, as much as four times.
They'd go to different boroughs of the city, or they'd go to counties outside the city, or they go to New Jersey, and they'd register four times.
Let's say they live in Brooklyn, they'd register in Brooklyn.
Then they'd go to Queens, they'd register in Queens.
Then they'd take a little ride out to Nassau County and Suffolk County, and now they'd be in four places.
Or they could be in Bergen County, New Jersey, Westchester County, New York, as much as four times.
Now, a lot of them were just plain welfare recipients.
But how about something like 70 or 80 were working for the New York City Police Department or the Board of Education?
City workers were doing this.
They were taking time off and registering as if they weren't working and collecting welfare.
Well, they're doing the same thing.
And this already is a big number, but this is a really big number.
And it would be enormously useful if we figured it out.
Because then we would have enough money to take care of the people who really need it.
This thing is going to go broke.
Or it's going to lose public support.
I don't understand if you care about people, how you think you're helping them if you let them cheat.
All it does is hurt the people that really need it.
Maybe you could increase the coverage if you got it down to the people who really needed it.
Who knows how much of this is going on?
It could be astronomy.
I mean, it could be really, really big.
And when you put in it also the cheating that's done by the medical professionals in these programs, the tests that aren't necessary because of the pressure that's put on them by the hospitals and the programs.
When you cut this by a reasonable amount, you create the discipline to go find that.
And you're going to end up saving the program.
And so they say that the bill has taken sensible steps to try to discover this.
And also pairing Medicaid with work and upward mobility will help.
I agree with all that.
And that's what we did.
I mean, I can give you an object lesson in that.
That's what we did with welfare.
We got the double, triple, and quadruple dippers off as much as possible by finger imaging.
So we didn't count on their even facial.
We went with fingerprints.
We found you doing it twice, three times before we threw you off.
If it was an abusive case, we prosecuted you.
So here's an interesting question I'm going to take up with Ted.
We'll do it when we come back.
But here's the question so you can think about.
So some people think that the only answer to what happened with Biden at all is that we put a limit on the age of people in public office.
And Ted friend and mine, Representative John James of Michigan, wants to have a 75-year-old upper cap for people in public office.
But here's the question that the Wall Street Journal columnist Matthew Hennessy raises.
I think it's brilliant.
He goes back to Ronald Reagan, where Ronald Reagan says to Mondale, I'm not going to raise your youth and experience.
Should somebody be president of the United States who's only 35 years old?
We'll talk about that when we come back.
Thank you.
Here we are, pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process for roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers, but you know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
they're going to go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so Oh my goodness.
Look at these.
my goodness You're going to want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Ruby Sparky.
Are you ready for some action?
I'm ready for action!
Get the Elite TV plan only through the portal.
218 channels, and it's only $69.95 a month, including your free portal.
That's cheaper than everyone else.
Your favorite sports.
Movies, news, even daytime drama.
We're talking about ESPN-O-A-N newsmax.
Channels you can't get any more in certain areas.
Compared to the competition, this is a way better deal.
Everyone's selection.
Not to mention all the free music channels.
There's over 700 premium and classic movies all ready to go.
Plus, they got catch-up TV that allows you to go back and watch what you've missed or want to watch again.
Cut your cable in half and get twice as much for free.
Way more channels for half the cost.
After the first year, the subscription then drops to $57.95 monthly where you change or upgrade anytime.
Go to QUXNow.com and get yours today.
Use promo code RUDY.
These deals are selling out.
U.S. Army Major Scott Smiley paid a high price serving on Nation.
Scott was leading his platoon in Iraq when a blast sent shrapnel through his eyes, leaving him blind and temporarily paralyzed.
Scott would become the first blind, active duty military officer before medically retiring years later.
Thanks to friends like you, the Tunnels of Towers Foundation gave Scott and his family a mortgage-free, specially adapted, smart home.
Show your support for America's heroes.
Now, donate $11 a month to Tunnels and Towers at T2T.org.
Thank you.
Yeah, I'm going to take that off the background.
Well, that was quite a headline that you have there, and I think quite legitimate, and it's about time.
I mean, from the beginning, from the beginning of my discoveries concerning Joe Biden, which go back way before the hard drive to 2018, but really 2019, it seemed to me this could not have happened without Obama being involved in it.
The 2015 daily, I'm sorry, a New York Times article, which was quite comprehensive about Hunter Biden's, which they described as unethical.
But if you just read a little bit and you knew the law, you could see it was illegal conduct in trying to collect money, particularly in Ukraine when his father was made the point man for Ukraine and put in charge of all the money going to Ukraine and was also put in charge of trying to reduce corruption in Ukraine.
And you saw that that was in the New York Times, which means Obama had to be aware of it.
And then it went on for years and Obama did nothing about it.
You had to know there was something wrong with Obama.
Right?
I mean, I was a mayor, so I think that way.
If I saw that about one of my commissioners, they'd be in my office that day.
And there better be a hell of an explanation for it, or they'd be gone.
Or certainly the son would be gone from that crooked company.
But Obama just sat back and let the whole thing go on.
There's also a lot of stuff about Obama in 2014 and 2015 and his deals that he may have made, all of which haven't been investigated.
Not saying they're true.
I'm telling you they haven't been investigated.
And now there's pretty much solid evidence that he knew completely about the, it isn't a Hillary hoax.
It's a Hillary plot, as the president says, to commit treason.
Now, it's not the treason as outlined in the Constitution about a time of war.
So let's call it overthrow of the government based on false purchased evidence, which is what the Steele dossier was and a lot of the rest.
The Steele dossier was from beginning to end completely untrue.
It not only was untrue, but it was paid for to be untrue.
And they all knew it.
And they were told it over and over again because the FBI recycled their investigation.
And every time they recycled their investigation, including the first one, in the words of the FBI agent telling his mistress, there's no there.
In other words, nothing connecting Trump.
But then they kept redoing it.
And they all knew that Hillary had laundered money through Perkins-Coley law firm.
And people want to know why Trump came down on Perkins-Coley because they're a shill for interfering in an election and trying to remove a lawfully elected president illegally.
And now it looks like there is evidence that has to be really checked out carefully, thanks to Tulsi Gabbard and her people.
The guy, you know, sitting at the top of this, watching this whole thing going on and having his people direct it was the prince.
The prince who came out of nowhere to be president.
The prince who became head of the Harvard Law Review without ever writing an article.
The prince who really appears to never have earned anything in his life.
Except trained pretty damn well as a communist.
And a obsessive, completely zealous colonialist to the point of throwing Churchill's statue or painting out of the White House.
He was apparently very much affected by the father he almost never met who opposed colonialism.
But he also was affected by his communist teachers.
But nobody will examine that about Obama because he's black, which is the only reason we elected him.
There's no other reason he was elected.
He was in the Senate for two years.
He didn't do anything in the Senate.
He was in the state legislature, one of the most crooked in the country for four or five years.
He didn't do anything there.
His education is a blur.
The fact that he was mentored by a communist is well known.
The fact that he went to a church with a hateful anti-American, whatever you want to call him, was very well known.
And the fact that he never really had a job, unless you consider community organizer a job.
or they got elected.
And then he set us on the path to communism.
So I think an investigation of just how much involvement he had in this now that we have a basic predicate that's heck of a lot stronger than anything they had on Trump.
They had nothing on Trump.
Not as strong as what they have on Biden, and they really walked out of that one.
So, and maybe we got to come up with a couple of Republicans in the Congress that have a pair of clones.
They didn't do much of a job in their investigations of Biden when the evidence was presented to him on the silver platter.
In fact, if you read their reports, they ignored the most important evidence.
Somebody's got to explain that to me someday.
It worries the hell out of me about whether all of this is just for show.
But let's hope.
Let's hope that they take the report from Chelsea Gabbard seriously.
The Martin Luther King papers were released, all, how many thousands of them?
How many pages?
230,000 pages.
Wow.
That's a lot.
And I mean, from the point of view of the King family, they believe that Lee, that James L. Ray, rather, Lee Harvey Oswald was Kennedy, that James L. Ray was not the killer.
I'd be interested in that as to why.
And now the King family is saying that the Epstein files should also be released.
Now, I don't know if they're doing that in good faith or they're doing that to get even or, but yeah, the Epstein files should be released consistent with protecting national security.
And here's where it gets a little tricky in both cases, the reputation of innocent people.
So how do you do that?
How do you do that if there are things in a report about them that are arguably you could use against them?
I don't know, it's really tough.
I mean, it is tough with these reports to meet the standards of, you know, somebody should be convicted before you say anything bad about them.
So I don't envy the people.
And I'm sure even with the 230,000 King pages that were released, I'd be interested, and I haven't seen them.
I bet there are a lot of redactions today.
Yeah, but I'd be curious to see so far what I've seen and read is that not much has been newly discovered.
Yeah, I mean, the Kennedy papers are more redaction than they are facts.
Now, James R. Ray eventually recanted his confession, you know.
He died in 1998, so you're not going to get much out of him.
The case that you probably don't know real well, but I do because it happened when I was a New Yorker and it was one of the most famous cases in New York.
And then my office, U.S. Attorney's Office, took up an investigation of it because one of my assistants was very, very interested in it.
And that's the Eton Page case.
Eton Page was a young boy, he was six years old at the time, who disappeared.
And he came from the Lower East Side of Manhattan.
And how about he disappeared and there was no trace of him?
And the murder investigation went on and on and on and on by both the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Manhattan District Attorney's Office.
And eventually they prosecuted, this is well after I left as U.S. Attorney, which was in 1988, 1988, sorry, 1988, 89, 89, beginning of 1989.
So this guy was convicted in 2017, Pedro Hernandez.
Now, he confessed into luring the six-year-old boy into the basement of the bodega near his Manhattan school.
And he was convicted.
And he got a 25 years to life prison sentence.
And now the case has been overturned on appeal.
And he has to be given a new trial.
Says the federal appeals court in Manhattan.
And it's going to be very strange trying a case that's that old.
This guy didn't become a suspect until 2012, which is well after I had any knowledge of this case.
And he apparently was turned in by a prayer group.
In one of his recorded confessions, it's said that he said, something just took over me, but I didn't know how to do it.
I felt so sorry.
The child's body was never recovered.
There's no physical evidence.
His first trial in 2015 ended in a hung jury.
And the jury sent a note to the judge, the second jury.
And this is what the reversal is based on.
And this is like this reversal takes place, what the heck, eight years after he was convicted.
The jury sent in a note that said, should they disregard all of Hernandez's videotaped confessions if they found that an earlier admission that he made about doing the killing, he had made before he had been read as Miranda rights.
And the judge, Maxwell Wiley, responded, without further explanation, the answer is no.
The jury went back.
Seven days later, they convicted Hernandez.
Seven days later.
And the court, the federal court has decided that the jurors at the very least should have been told to make up their own minds about the later confession.
because the legal team of Fernandez argues that his confessions were delusional.
This is a very, very difficult decision.
A very, very difficult decision because it's based on the exclusionary rule, which is the disciplinary rule.
I mean, you could be guilty as hell and not being given your manda rights and innocent as hell and being given your Miranda rights.
Giving Miranda rights has nothing to do with your innocence or your guilt, really, unless you're talking about somebody being tortured.
It's a technical rule to discipline the police.
Probably the invention of a judge like Douglas who sort of created Roe against Wade with his penumbras of privacy.
I've never understood that or the exclusionary rule of evidence.
That should result in disciplinary action toward the police officers, not letting guilty people go free.
It was sort of the start of modest pro-criminal behavior, which now is out of control.
I mean, you could almost say the Democratic Party is a pro-criminal party.
Certainly in New York, I don't know the Democratic Party elsewhere.
Certainly in 2020.
Just the cases I just the judges I read to you.
Today.
A murderer, his friend is sitting in the courtroom.
The friend goes to sleep.
The judge throws the friend out and the murderer case is reversed.
Because you have to have a public trial?
There's nothing not public about throwing a sleeping person out of a courtroom.
Public doesn't mean that, you know, 30 people can sit there and sleep.
Suppose I said, I'm going to give you a public trial.
But the only people allowed in here have to take, what's the drug that Hunter says is ambient.
But enough ambient so they fall asleep.
That's not a public trial.
Oh, well.
AOC's office, AOC's office, that very, very overachieving bartender, has been vandalized.
Wow.
And man, wouldn't she hope it was the poor boys?
What are they?
Not the poor boys.
Proud boys.
The proud boys?
The proud boys.
What's the other group?
White Lives Matter?
There are a few others, aren't there?
Oh, God, yeah.
They're committing crimes all the time.
That's why you can remember them.
Yeah, there's BLM.
No, BLM is on the other side.
So she was vandalized by people that say she's doing too much for Israel.
Oh, yes.
No, no, no.
Truth.
AOC funds genocide in Gaza because she ditched her squad colleagues and voted against a proposed amendment to slash millions in aid for Israel's missile defense, think she's thinking about running for statewide office in New York.
A group known as the Bogey Down Liberation Front, FAOC.
The Bronx is sick and tired of people like AOC and Richie Torres using us as a stepping stone for their own political careers.
Now, there's a big difference between Richie Torres and AOC.
Richie Torres is about as close to a middle-of-the-road conservative Democrat as you can get.
And AOC would be as flying off the wall as the one who married her brother and some of the other whack jobs, if it weren't for the fact that she has to worry about an electorate in New York.
I don't really know if AOC knows what she's talking about at all.
Half the time, when she starts explaining, it doesn't lead to anything.
But what the heck?
I mean, she may be actually smarter than Kamala Pamela, right?
One never knows.
It wouldn't take a lot.
Right.
So the names of sports teams are getting to be really big.
And I know, and the president now is getting really dug in on this Guardian thing, right?
Yeah, he is very much in favor.
So wait a second.
Bring him back to Redskins.
Not the Guardian, Commanders.
Yeah.
So he's.
But if you're going to change commanders, you got to change Guardians, too.
Yeah, that's another thing.
That's ridiculous when you look at the standings.
We will look at the standings the other day.
If you go to a Cleveland Indian, Cleveland Guardians.
Guardians?
Everyone's still wearing Indians gear.
It's like you go to a Redskins game or a commander's game.
Everyone's still wearing Redskins gear, but you will see more commanders gear.
We'll say that.
Well, the president says...
I'll say that.
A lot less in Cleveland.
In Washington, you get some commander's gear.
But in Cleveland, it's still all Indians.
What do you wear if you're a commander?
A hat?
Yeah, I don't.
What is there?
I think it's just the letter C. Like, what's the logo?
I don't know.
A commander.
Commander.
A commander is like in the Navy.
Let's see if we can find some.
I'll find the logo.
A commander is like a Navy officer, right?
Right.
Did you ever think about, I mean, the Redskins, was that ever an issue growing up, the name?
No.
Why would it be an issue?
The Irish of Notre Dame.
That's the old game.
Well, Massapequa, which is a town that I know well because it was very close to where I grew up for part of my life.
Massapequa has a very good high school football team.
And their nickname, this is their nickname.
It's not even like a professional team, right?
It's the Chiefs.
And for years, they've been known as the Chiefs.
Well, they have to change their names now based on the law of the state of the socialist state of New York.
It's crazy.
And Massapiqua doesn't want to change their name.
And the president went out there and visited them.
And the president has gotten involved in this here thing.
I love that.
We're going to put the logo up in a second here.
And he says that, and the school board president wants to keep the name.
And he says it's about not erasing, but instead educating about Native Americans and keeping them in the forefront.
Right.
What is wrong?
Native American tribes like the Dutch had mayors in their cities, which is how the mayor of New York was started as a Dutch mayoralty.
They have chiefs for their tribes.
What's wrong with that?
How is that demeaning to Native Americans if you name a team after the leaders of Native American groups?
Or if you call them the name they were originally given, which was wrong, but teaches you something about history when you learn it, about how people thought the world was flat and had no idea how big the world was, which is why they thought they were in India.
And they were given the name Indians.
There was nothing, there's nothing bad about that name.
And if they share it with another group of people, I don't think from all the polls that I've seen, I don't think Native Americans really care about this.
In fact, there are some now that feel that they're being demeaned by this silliness.
So explain to me how I don't want to cause any more trouble, but what about the Atlanta Braves?
What's the new chiefs and Braves?
So the Braves were the young What's that?
That's the old Chief.
That's the old Redskins logo.
Okay, so that's a Chief.
And now in Atlanta, you have the Braves.
The Chiefs are the top.
The Braves are the young guys.
Yeah.
Why is Braves okay, but Chiefs bad?
So I think Braves, Brave isn't the name of a Redskins is a slur.
Because it says skin?
Is that the reason?
I think it's something to do with red skin.
Like red.
Like the Indians, I guess they used to be.
That's the first time I heard.
Redskin, I guess.
Yeah.
I thought it was a bad word.
Well, you could argue that's just as bad, if not worse, than red skin, right?
No, no, I just thought it was a bad word.
I was used to Negro, that used to be the name for the advancement of the Negro people.
Black is my generation.
When you were a kid, black wasn't a word.
NAACP uses the word Negro to describe the race, which is probably one of its greatest organizations.
Yeah.
So I never heard, I mean, I don't know when I first heard the expression black, but I was taught you never say the N-word and you say Negro.
And then I heard black and I thought, oh, what?
Yeah.
And what is that a bad word?
And then that was the preferred word.
And what is black?
Well, if black is okay, why is red skin bad?
Well, what is black in Spanish?
Negro.
They usually refer to Spanish as brown, right?
They say brown people and black people.
Yeah, yeah, but I'm saying the language.
The word black in the Spanish language, it's Negro.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
And Italian, too.
Italian is color black.
Yeah, the color black, yeah.
Negro.
Yeah.
So there's that element as well.
Well, I'm not sure Negro is a bad description.
I'm not sure.
But you're supposed to say black.
But isn't that so why is that?
But red?
That's what the red for red is for Indian.
But then if you say red for Indian, somehow that's wrong.
But you say black.
You say white, even though white people are.
If you say white for me, it's okay.
Yeah.
What am I going to put down?
So it's all really, it's ridiculous.
And the fact that they caved is the problem.
The fact that the organizations caved, the Indians.
There's so many things to concentrate on.
It is absolutely stupid.
The other thing really, really stupid is Hunter Biden getting an interview and saying all the stupid, crazy things and calling the president an effing dictator and telling us that that wasn't his drugs.
Then whose drugs was it?
Who are you selling it to?
And if you think I believe that he's free of drugs, then you think I was never a prosecutor.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So Joe was on ambient, and that's why he screwed up the debate.
Let's see if you can find that clip.
She'll find it.
Okay.
Do they ever tell the truth?
Did the Bidens ever tell the truth?
Ever.
Has Joe Biden ever told the truth?
Go find an example for me.
Just like go find an example where he was ever right about foreign policy.
Because people in his own party tell you that there's no such example.
And while he was president, it was one disaster after another.
So here was the question I was going to ask you, and we'll conclude with that.
Well, I was going to play here's Hunter's, here's Hunter on his dad.
Oh, we're going to watch Hunter?
Around the world, basically, the mileage that he could have flown around the world three times.
I know exactly what happened in that debate.
He flew around the world, basically, the mileage that he could have flown around the world three times.
He's 81 years old.
He's tired as shit.
They give him ambient to be able to sleep.
He gets up on the stage and he looks like he's a deer in the headlights.
I know exactly.
Well, when did he go to sleep?
10 hours before, 12 hours before.
I don't get that.
If they gave him ambient to go to sleep and he wasn't over it by then, he's got a problem.
And does that explain, does that explain, you effing criminal?
Does that explain how he falls down going upstairs?
Who the hell falls down going upstairs?
Who thinks that a dead congresswoman is in the audience or that Roosevelt was on television three years, he was dead three years before there was television?
And who the hell likes little girls, maybe you, touching the hair on their legs?
Sick.
Why, why did they, who was that freak that was with him anyway?
Oh, that guy.
Look, I don't want to throw him under the bus.
He's an interesting guy.
He's been doing interviews for a while.
I will say, I was surprised to see him with the Hunter Biden interview.
Did he challenge him?
No.
No, I haven't watched it.
Have you watched it?
I actually haven't watched it.
I've seen a couple clips.
Well, okay.
To be fair, we have to.
Yeah.
I saw a little bit of it.
I saw no challenge to him.
Certainly no challenge is reported, so I'll watch it tonight.
Yeah.
I'll watch it.
If I'm wrong, I will say it.
Yeah.
I'm sure I have a feeling you didn't challenge him.
That reporter is not really considered a serious.
Who is he?
What's his name?
Andrew something.
I forget his name, but he used to do funny videos.
I liked him five years ago because he would do funny videos.
Well, it's a funny video.
Yeah.
And now he's doing like an sit-down interview.
It's just very interesting.
I was surprised to see him being the guy.
Well, we're going to watch.
We're going to watch, even though it's painful.
We're going to watch the whole damn thing.
Okay.
And then we'll report on it to you tomorrow night.
But let's, you had a question.
Let's talk about you wanted to.
Okay.
Here's what we're going to conclude with.
And we can even have people think about this a little.
So do you think there should be an age limit?
And James, Congressman James, suggests 75 on the, which is the age limit for cardinals, by the way, being popes or pope.
You don't have to be a cardinal to be a pope, come to think of it.
Is it 75 or 80?
It's 80.
It's 80.
I'm sorry.
Cardinals have to retire at 75, but they're often given an extension until about 80.
Do you think there should be an age limit, whether it's 75 or 80 or whatever?
Now, the guy writing the article says he's more worried about young people who don't know what the hell they're doing becoming president.
And very few people at 35 years old are experienced enough to handle head of any major organization, particularly with how infantile our current generation is.
I mean, a lot of them don't even get out of mommy's house until they're 25 or 30, right?
Right.
You got very, very few that, you know, have lived a lifetime by the time they're 21.
So what do you think, Mayor?
Well, I like democracy and I like people being able to choose what they want.
Right.
And it is true that Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence at 33 years old, but there's been only one Thomas Jefferson.
Look what they're doing to him.
I think 35 is too young to be president.
I think, particularly in our modern society where we have such long educational programs, you know, if we go back to the founding fathers, they were pretty much finished with formal education at 21 and everything else then.
And they were probably better educated than most of our PhDs, but they did it themselves.
And because of the way life was a lot more basic than it is now, you had to grow up pretty fast to take care of yourself.
And I'm talking about even if you came from a relatively, not a rich family where you'd always be pampered, but from, not always be pampered, but where there'd be the possibility of being pampered.
But if even you came up from a stable middle class family, you were going to have to take on responsibilities a lot faster than you do now.
So when they picked the age 35, I would say as a group, the 35-year-olds were much more mature than the 35-year-olds of today and had done a lot more in terms of, you know, taking care of their lives.
So if you wanted to say 40, it'd be okay.
We're not going to change it.
It's in the Constitution.
So it's a little bit of.
Should there be a maximum?
Well, the maximum that James suggests is 75, which actually, given, well, I mean, I'm 81, right?
Yeah.
I'm 81.
I would think it would at least be 80.
There's absolutely no reason there should be a cap.
We have elections.
We have term limits.
They're called re-election every two years in Congress.
Somebody should leave it up to democracy.
And if you have someone that's really good in their 80s that has experience and they're good, why would you want you would want that person involved?
We should encourage that.
We should encourage people staying involved for as long as they can.
I don't understand why you wouldn't.
It actually seems like the exact opposite.
Because of the danger of cognitive decline at a more elderly age, energy.
Congress is every two years.
Is there a point at which you should interfere?
Like we interfere.
We interfere with democracy on two terms for a president, right?
I disagree with that.
Well, that's interesting.
Actually, no, I don't know.
Actually, I take that back.
No, no, no.
I don't know if I disagree with that, actually.
But I'm open to questioning it.
Yeah.
Because, but you start to wonder, right?
If the election systems aren't fair, you get someone in office that can control the elections.
You know why the two-term limit could be really damaging?
You don't get any consistency.
So, I mean, one of the criticisms of why our government is so dysfunctional is, yeah, there's a permanent bureaucracy, and that gets worse because the upper region is changing all the time.
I mean, first of all, we don't always have a two-term presidency.
I mean, we've had a one-term presidency as often as a two-term presidency.
And a one-term presidency in many ways is a disaster.
I mean, the administration is getting started and they get kicked out.
Now a new one comes in.
It's completely the opposite.
I mean, we could see it in the switch from Biden.
I mean, forget Trump to Biden, but you can see it in the switch.
and now the turmoil we're going through now to switch back So the one argument against it is a 12-year term would give you a chance to really get things done.
You'd have a consistent program you could follow and get them done, as opposed to this constant shifting at the top, which with the gigantic, monstrous, idiotic government that we've put together, which is completely inconsistent with what we ever thought, this monster of a government, it really allows them to take control.
It allows the deep state, I mean, it allows for the deep state.
Yeah.
But here's the real answer.
Right now, this country is split in half, right?
Maybe we're doing a little better as Republicans, but we're not doing landslide better.
And you're not getting two-thirds of the states to agree on anything.
So unless it were just pure vanilla.
I don't see a constitutional amendment.
If you tried to put a 40-year-old limit on it, the young people would go crazy.
If you tried to put a 75-year-old limit on it, the elderly people would go crazy.
And you just won't get it passed.
It has to be a constitutional amendment.
It can't be a law.
You got to get two-thirds Of both houses and two-thirds of the states.
I don't know what you could get two-thirds of Congress to agree on right now, or two-thirds of the states.
And these numbers have served us well enough.
Why change something if it isn't obvious that it has to be changed?
At any time, I mean, a 50-year-old guy could get demented and they could hide it, right?
Yeah.
Or a 50-year-old guy could go brain dead.
Something could happen.
And they could hide it, right?
Or they could hide that you're a communist with a young guy like Mondami.
Yeah.
I would almost think someone in their 80s are stupid enough not to listen to the warnings when you get warnings like DeBasio, who went on his honeymoon to Cuba.
Like, who the hell goes to the honeymoon in Cuba if it's not a communist?
Or like Obama, who used to sit in a church and listen to a minister say, GD the United States.
And people weren't smart enough to say, gee, maybe he shouldn't be president.
He's black, so let's make him president, even though he would sit there and listen to the United States be cursed out every Sunday.
Someone should go back and.
2008 was an interesting.
I was in high school, so I'm going to go back and read that.
You want to go back about that cycle.
I heard that, I said, this is no way.
What are you crazy?
Don't put somebody there who, I mean, there's enough indications he hates America anyway.
Right.
And the wife.
Oh, gosh.
The wife, you know, the only time I've been proud of my country is when we elected the communist.
Her husband.
Right.
Or communist-trained.
Whatever the hell he was.
You know, you say, well, he can't be a communist because he's a billionaire now.
Well, so are most of the communists.
You don't think Xi Jinping is one of the wealthiest men in China?
Well, we'll be back tomorrow.
Plenty to cover.
We got to see how we got to see how things go along in Iran.
Because I'm still hoping that I'm going to get back to Tehran soon.
Because I really love the Iranian people.
I've come to love them.
And I really think they're entitled to freedom.
And I think it's the key to peace in the Middle East, which is why it concerns us so much.
So let's pray for the people of Iran.
And let's pray for the people of Israel and the people of Ukraine, all waiting on a solution.
And let's pray, of course, for the United States of America, greatest country on earth, and for your guiding and helping our president, not just to make us great again, but to assist the whole world.
Because that's what we do.
So, Ted, you got anything else?
No, I thought it was a good show, another good show.
Good.
We've got our camera here.
We're working on it.
We're going to give it some more backlights.
It's one of our best pictures ever.
Right.
So let's say, God bless America.
It's our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
It was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the Kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country, a country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
We're able to talk.
▲
Export Selection