All Episodes
Previous Next
July 1, 2024 - Rudy Giuliani
58:01
The Rudy Giuliani Show JOINS FrankSpeech! - Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity UPENDS the Left's Plan to Take Down Trump - 1 July 2024
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
♪♪ ♪♪
♪♪ Bye.
Good evening!
This is Rudy Giuliani with the Rudy Giuliani Show, and I have in front of me what will be, as the Chief Justice promised some time ago, an opinion for the ages.
People will be studying this in constitutional law class long after we're gone, and it is a great, great contribution to American law.
Boy, do we need it.
But we need a great contribution to American law with the destruction that's been done by these Biden fascists for such a period of time.
My heart and my soul as a lawyer was lifted as I read this.
And I've been critical of Chief Justice Roberts sometimes for feeling that he's maybe, I'm not going to say political, political with regard to the court.
Of course, you know, I'm not the Chief Justice and therefore Maybe I'd be too.
I don't know.
I knew him when he was a very young man, just out of law school.
I've always had a very high opinion of him.
I've occasionally gotten angry at him if the decision wasn't the way I thought it should be, as lawyers always do.
I must say this is one of the finest opinions I've ever read by anyone.
It is brilliantly researched exhaustively.
The dissents Almost written by people that almost didn't seem to go to law school, but they just had a dissent because they're Democrats.
Which is really outrageous.
When you consider that maybe it's because Justice Roberts wrote it in such a persuasive way, it seems so darn self-evident.
And this is exactly what I thought they would do.
I predicted this the day after the argument.
Maybe not all the fine particulars of it, which are extraordinary.
But the essential thrust of it.
And so here's what it amounts to.
Smith, who has a reputation for indicting people for crimes they didn't commit, getting them convicted, losing their political career, and then having the case reversed by the Supreme Court in the McDonald situation, 8-0, after he's done all the damage that the Democrat Party wants him to do.
Smith, who is a hitman in that regard, And I know the court can't recognize these things, but maybe they would like something from a very, very experienced prosecutor.
He was selected by our crooked Attorney General because he's a hitman.
If you wanted a fair and honest appraisal of this case, the last guy you'd select is Smith.
The last guy you'd select is a guy who had his last political case reversed by the Supreme Court, 8-0, because of his misconduct.
And because you feel you can get away with it.
Because you're the Democrats and my goodness, you've got a Pravda going for you in the press.
They assigned this rogue prosecutor and he did the same thing.
He put together this completely meritless prosecution and tried to rush it to trial.
Although it contains questions of vast constitutional importance that would bind this republic forever might very well if decided incorrectly by the democrat judges in the district of columbia who i'm not even sure they're any they're judges anymore they decided this quote quickly they they didn't review 90 of the case why did they decide it quickly they decided it quickly because they really weren't interested in the justice here
They're interested in getting another conviction against Trump so they could say convicted felon, convicted felon, convicted felon.
The Supreme Court very, very gently, very in a very classy way points out numerous times how this case was rushed through the lower courts and expresses a little amazement at how you could rush a constitutional question of this magnitude so quickly.
It doesn't answer.
The question it raises, you know, the answer to the question, they rushed it because they don't care.
All they care about is to see if they can get in the district of Columbia, a conviction, which you could get by just standing up and say, convict Trump or Giuliani or Bannon or, and then it'd get reversed later.
Well, Roberts has thought of everything, including the fact, so let's go to the end of it.
That as this case now goes back to the district court, they've made it clear that whatever the district court decides, they're going to get to review before it goes to trial.
They're not going to play one of these games like was played in New York, where the judge didn't even conduct a trial based on American law.
He kind of used some kind of combination of Nazi law, Soviet law, the Cuban law, I don't know where he got the idea you can have a criminal verdict less than unanimous or where he got the idea you could charge somebody with a crime without telling what the crime is, but certainly not from America.
But you say to yourself, how could you do that?
Well, you do it because first you get the conviction.
It can be worthless as Smith did before.
And it gets to the appellate section.
It gets to the DC circuit.
They'll approve anything that'll screw Trump, which they did here.
It gets to the Supreme Court, and of course it turns out to be totally meritless, unfair, and unethical.
And your reputation's ruined by then.
And it's cost you five million.
This is the fascist state that we live in today, given to us by Joseph Robinette Biden, the imbecile who you saw debating the other night, looking like someone that You couldn't imagine in your wildest dreams would be president of the United States.
And you wonder what the rest of the world must think watching that.
Well, in any event, here's what, here's what the judge decided.
Trump went up and said, um, these acts they are indicted me for what they're basically, they use four statutes.
You know, two of them, they may not be able to use anymore because separately the Supreme court has decided that the obstruction statute they're using Applies basically to records and financial investigations.
It was done by the Sarbanes-Oxley law.
And that one word otherwise doesn't mean all criminal statutes.
So we'll explain that a little later, but it may mean that two of these counts go out immediately before you even get to this.
The court has said that Trump, you're wrong.
Government, you're wrong.
So Trump said, president has absolute immunity.
Uh, you cannot prosecute a president, uh, whether he's in office or out of office for crimes, unless you, uh, impeach him first.
Uh, because it would create tremendous, tremendous, uh, uh, interference in the ability of the president to make decisions.
I'll give you an example.
I can list 10 things that we could indict Biden for as soon as he leaves office.
What about not complying with the immigration laws?
There are 10 million illegals in this country.
That's not a discretionary decision the president gets to make.
He can let a few people in here or there.
And he actually announced that he wasn't gonna, he said, surge to the border, we won't let you come in.
Yeah, and we'll give you an exemption.
That's a violation of the law.
And we could argue it's a conspiracy to defraud the United States.
We could say it's an obstruction of justice.
How about the people that died in, people that died in Afghanistan?
The president made, I mean it would be as if you were driving an automobile and you were drunk, given the decisions that he made.
He decided to take out the troops before the civilians and he got the civilians killed.
Now any moron would know, and you realize now he's a moron because you've seen him, any moron would know that if you did that you'd get those people killed in the thousands and Couple of Gold Star parents would love to make that case against him.
Saw two of them on television today.
They despised the man.
They quite rightly believe that if it weren't for him, their children would be alive today.
Homicidal negligence?
I think so.
Certainly if the hitman Smith or Crooked Garland got their way.
I wouldn't prosecute the case because I have ethics, but you could sure, under a decision like they're seeking, do it.
I would say, without even stretching my imagination, I'd come up with 10 felony prosecutions before we even got to all the bribes that he took from Russia, China, Ukraine.
Why does he always pick enemies?
How about giving back the Bagram Air Base?
Sam, we don't need the airbase.
It's only 400 miles from China.
What do we need an airbase 400 miles from China?
You think maybe I could argue it had a connection to the 31 million he got within the four years before that?
For most other people who would, you're entitled to argue inferences from the evidence.
We'll take a shot at it.
We could certainly indict him for that one, too.
Now, the only difference with him is they're probably going to tell the truth and say that he's incapable of going to trial because he's a non-compass menace.
So here's what it comes down to.
The president doesn't have complete immunity for everything, nor does he have no immunity, which is what Smith was saying.
So here's how it breaks down.
The president has absolute immunity for anything, and here's the way they describe it.
So let's use the language they use.
Within the outer perimeter Of his official responsibility.
Well, first of all, if it's directly in his official responsibility, they say conclusive and preclusive, you can't touch it.
So if the president fires the attorney general, only the president can appoint the attorney general.
Only the president can fire the attorney general.
The courts have nothing to do with it.
The Congress has nothing to do with it.
And article one and article three, it's all article two.
Can't touch them.
You cannot bring him to trial, criminally or civilly, for that.
If the president refuses to negotiate a treaty, to go negotiate a treaty, he can't do anything to him.
Only he can negotiate it.
Only he can conduct the foreign policy of the United States, except with the exceptions, like Congress has to approve a treaty.
Interesting question.
Can the president decide that something that is a treaty is not a treaty and not get congressional I would say that's what happened with Iran, and both Obama and Biden got away with it.
I think even under this standard, they could be prosecuted for that, but God forbid we prosecute a Democrat.
We only prosecute Democrats who turn on Biden, like Menendez and people like that.
But if you're with Biden, you don't get prosecuted unless you screw up the deal they worked out, like his stupid son did.
So if it's within his Conclusive and what the words that John Roberts uses are conclusive and preclusive, meaning precludes everybody else, right?
Authority granted by the Constitution or the Congress.
Nobody can interfere with it.
He is what you call absolutely immune.
And there are a whole list of powers the president has like that, many of which they unfairly were investigating him for when I represented him in the impeachment proceeding.
And all of which we got knocked out by Mueller's staff.
Mueller, who has a form of whatever it is Biden has, had the foggiest idea what he was doing.
He didn't even know that the Justice Department doesn't allow you to indict a president.
They had to tell him when I went to a meeting with him.
That was the last time I saw him.
Next time, he was in front of Congress making a fool out of himself.
Why we appoint such people is obvious.
We appoint Mueller, who is... I lost it.
And we appoint Smith, who's crooked, because we want unfair results.
Because, gee guys, we got a crooked AG.
Did you ever figure that out?
And we have a totally corrupted Justice Department.
It's a tragedy.
I love the Justice Department.
I served it for, what, 15 years of my life.
I got all kinds of awards from the Justice Department that I treasure.
It breaks my heart.
You know how happy I was to read this decision?
I haven't read such a great, unbelievable analysis of our constitution and balanced presentation.
Oh gosh, in so long.
It says to me, we still have great judges.
And I just want to say thank you, John Robertson.
Thank you, Justice Thomas.
Your point is equally well taken.
And I'll tell you what that is.
It's brilliant, actually.
He may very well have been the best judge in the last 50 years.
He and Scalia, very close.
Scalia always gets the credit because, you know, Nino was very, very... Nino was a character.
He was a colleague of mine in the Justice Department.
And Justice Thomas is very quiet, but his opinions may be the best.
So, now, here's where we get into litigation.
There are powers the President has that are not exclusively his.
He shares them, like making laws, right?
He proposes laws, Congress passes them.
He executes them.
Congress can't get involved in that.
He negotiates treaties, but he's got to go to Congress with them.
So in that area, when you get into that area, it's not exclusive and preclusive.
Or he enforces the laws that were passed by Congress.
Well, what about the election laws?
According to Smith, he shouldn't be allowed to prosecute the election laws.
And if he does, he can prosecute him, because that's what they're prosecuting him for.
They're prosecuting him for enforcing the election laws of the United States, as he concluded were arguably violated.
Now, who can interfere with that conclusion?
And if people can interfere with that conclusion and indict him for it, what president in the future is ever going to take up an allegation of election fraud?
Without fear that if he loses, they're going to put him in prison.
This is what Roberts points out and then goes back to our founding fathers to show that those brilliant people who now the left, you know, wants to forget about anticipated all this.
And that's why it's within the exclusive province of the president.
So, uh, he, the president, uh, former president Trump is indicted for his discussions with the acting attorney general.
Telling him to investigate, being angry at him for not doing so, and threatening to fire him even.
Supreme Court says that falls within his official authority.
It falls within, it falls squarely within his official authority, but they give him much more room than that.
They say his official responsibility to the outer perimeter, in other words, stretch as far as possible, and he has presumptive immunity.
So when you're going against the president saying he doesn't have immunity, you have to prove he doesn't have immunity.
He doesn't have to prove that he does.
Smith hasn't done that at all.
I mean, his indictment is completely devoid of attempting to do that.
Nor did the judges who are hurrying this because they were trying to get this done before the election because they had no concern about justice.
Because Roberts can't say that.
I can.
But it's implicit in his opinion.
Didn't bother about that.
So.
As to his conversations with the Attorney General and the Justice Department, the Supreme Court has taken that off the district court's plate.
That's completely immune.
He can't be prosecuted.
He can say anything he wants to his Attorney General.
It's his Attorney General.
And you can't get involved in it, Smith or court.
So those counts will have to be dismissed, along with the obstruction counts.
We're getting down to a little indictment now.
I mean, not worth bringing, actually.
Now, here's where it gets a little bit different.
Question is, he can be prosecuted for unofficial conduct.
For example, if the president, gosh, I've seen movies like where a president killed his girlfriend or something, or the president, or was it Secretary of Defense?
I don't remember.
But it was something like that.
And, you know, you cannot do that.
There's no argument there that that's within any kind of official authority or the outer perimeter.
And when you say official authority, you have to go back to a provision of the Constitution or a law of Congress that authorizes it.
And then you have to interpret it, whether his action fits within that Even the outer perimeter of it, even if it seems like it's a little bit extended, for fear that you're going to stop a president from acting aggressively in the interest of the United States.
The opinion also quite slyly points out how important it is to have an alert, aggressive, energetic president.
They do it from the point of view of you can't have all these laws surrounding him if you expect that, but you know what they're talking about.
Particularly after the other night.
So we'll be back very shortly and we'll conclude this and we'll take a look at that.
Well, I mean, this has been a historic week.
This is a historic opinion for the ages, as the chief says.
And that opinion will live in American history.
I mean, that was by far, without any doubt, the worst performance by any candidate for president.
And we'll look at a little of it.
You've probably seen a lot of it.
but I'm going to try to give you my couple of little things that maybe you notice, maybe you don't.
We'll be right back.
Here we are pretty much at the beginning of the process here at this pristine, I call it a laboratory.
It's not like a factory, it's like a hospital.
This is the beginning of the process.
For roasting.
Deep green, very good quality.
Most people don't use this quality.
We deal with small farmers because they like to know who we're dealing with.
They give us the highest quality, all organic, non-GMO.
You should know, all Arabica beans.
No Robusto.
All Arabica.
They're gonna go into the roaster and it'll get roasted for about 20 minutes or so.
Oh my goodness, look at these!
My goodness!
Ha ha ha!
You're gonna want to specially order these.
This is what goes into Rudy's coffee.
Thanks for watching!
Thanks for watching!
Thanks.
So I know that was a long explanation.
I did teach Laura on and off, and I always thought I was pretty good at it because I made it simple, but this is... Well, actually, I really would recommend it.
It's 48 pages, the main opinion.
I'd recommend reading it.
I think it's accessible.
I don't think he uses necessarily legal words.
When he does, I think he does a good job of explaining them.
You can leave out the footnotes.
He'll save a lot of time.
We love to put footnotes in, lawyers do, because we don't plagiarize except for the guy in the White House.
And I think you'll get it, you'll get it.
But I'm going to show you a little chart of what I just told you that might make it easy for you to explain this to your kids or whatever, and I'll make up even a fancier one for tomorrow, okay?
So the opinion comes down to this.
First thing is, You got to look at the Constitution.
If they're trying to go after the president for exercising his power, they've got to go, look, where does the power come from?
If the power comes from the Constitution or a law of Congress, and it's conclusive and preclusive, what does that mean?
That means it's clear and nobody else has it.
It's been kept from others.
Then it's absolutely immune.
Can't prosecute him.
Like talking to his Attorney General, like firing his Secretary of State.
You can't do anything about that, even though they tried to, remember?
They don't care about the Constitution of the Democrats.
Now, here's where we get into what this case is about.
Official action, unofficial action.
Official action is immune.
Unofficial action is like anyone else.
But it's not just clear official action.
It's anything that's within the outer perimeter of his authority.
If it is, he's immune.
If it isn't, he's not.
And he gets all the benefits here.
They have to prove that it isn't.
So if it's 50-50, you can't tell, president wins.
You understand what I mean by that, right?
So let's take, Let's take his call to Ramsenburg, you know, the secretary of state there who's finally been removed from their election commission because the lieutenant governor of Georgia concluded that he hasn't run a decent election since he's been there.
We might have wanted to know that, you know, four years ago.
And maybe those other networks would like to tell you that.
They hide it from you.
They also tell you that there are 375,000 ballots missing in Georgia, which is way beyond the number that we thought were crooked and phony.
And they might also tell you that a state senator and a whole group of his distinguished colleagues concluded way back in the end of 2020 that there was very, very good reason.
There was solid proof that the election in Georgia was tainted.
And to the extent where they could determine that Trump had really won enough votes to win Georgia.
Maybe the reason he's consistently ahead by five points.
He's actually consistently ahead by five points in all the states they stole from him.
Jeez.
That's about what he was ahead before they started stealing the night of the election.
Okay.
Okay.
Just how to get that in.
So now what they've done is they've returned it to the district court.
The judge who hates him, the judge who, if they didn't put these restraints on it, would just decide it right away.
They made the point that her decision was hasty, that her decision didn't take account of any of the facts and circumstances, that the Court of Appeals did the same thing.
They are rather dismissive of their opinions on the grounds that a decision of this magnitude can't possibly have been made that quickly.
They don't draw the conclusion that it was done for entirely political purposes.
You don't have to.
It's quite clear that that's the reason.
Nobody would decide a case like this without asking the questions that John Roberts did, who ever went to law school.
So now he's sending it back to them and he's saying, with regard to, for example, his discussions with Pence, his discussions with the Attorney General of Georgia, And his discussions with his staff, right?
All of that does fall within, arguably, the outer perimeter of his official power.
What's that power?
To enforce the laws of the United States.
What are those laws?
The election laws.
Now the question is, did he go beyond that?
They're going to have to prove that.
To do that, they're going to have to have extensive hearings.
She's gonna have to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, the district judge.
And here's a little trick, not a trick, but here's a little, you gotta know, you have to realize the brilliance of this, John Roberts.
The government argues that even if that has to happen, once it's over, you go right to trial.
You don't get an appeal until, Afterwards, there's generally a rule against interlocutory appeals in criminal cases.
So think about that.
I mean, Smith has only one thing in mind, right?
He wants a conviction, no matter what, before the election.
And like with McDonald's, if it gets overturned, he's a big hero with all of the Democratic swine.
I mean, even to argue that beforehand tells you that.
Roberts says, I got that.
I understand that's usually the case.
But these questions are of such a moment, and they've had no real examination over a couple hundred years of American history, since you happen to be the first administration to ever indict a former president, like a banana republic, that we're going to have an immediate appeal from that.
In other words, they're not going to let her just decide.
So let's say they go back, they have their hearings and she decides, you get prosecuted for everything, Trump.
You know, she writes some kind of intellectually dishonest opinion like Democrats have been doing for four years.
They get to review it before it goes into, before he gets, before he gets prosecuted.
And I'm telling you, if she screws around, I got a feeling you could tell they remembered Smith, if you read this carefully.
They remembered that Smith screwed around with them once before.
Probably another big mistake by Crooked Garland to pick them, but you could tell because they actually go ahead and, and they go, they go ahead and cite the case.
So you got to know these things to understand it, but I will say this case will be in the law books without any doubt, right near Right near the top of the section on separation of powers.
It does the best job of explaining separation of powers of any that I've seen in a long, long time.
And there are other things in it that have implications for other cases that we'll discuss in future shows.
But I just had a chance to read it.
It came down this morning.
I got a chance to read it.
I felt like I'm a lawyer again, even though New York has suspended me and District of Columbia For defending Trump.
Just like they put my friend Bannon in jail today, which is an absolute, unbelievable outrage.
Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinion, and I'm going to analyze that separately, but I'm just going to tell you what it was.
Real simple.
And it's real simple and true.
Smith never was authorized.
Smith is not a special prosecutor.
He's no different than you or me.
To exercise prosecutorial power, one would think you'd have to have some special... Well, the Attorney General can only appoint people who have a statutory position.
Like, I was a U.S.
Attorney.
I was not appointed by the Attorney General.
I was appointed by the President.
I was Associate Attorney General.
I was appointed by the President.
But the Attorney General appointed my assistant U.S.
Attorneys.
I had 180 of them.
I would hire them, I'd really pick them, but my first appointment, the Justice Department says, John Mitchell.
He was Nixon's Attorney General.
I was appointed by the U.S.
Attorney, but theoretically by, and it was based on a statute that sets up the office of Assistant United States Attorney.
United States Attorney and Associate Attorney General.
They all have statutes.
Thomas goes back to why we had a revolution to explain how important this is.
Because the king used to create offices for all his pals.
You know, like Biden does with those Ukrainian people that he has dinner with and the other people and the other people and the other people.
Like his son was doing.
The king would just appoint people.
Well, in the United States, we decided you can only appoint if an office is created in advance by the legislature to protect against somebody becoming a king.
Thank you, King Biden.
Well, he's absolutely right.
That means the whole indictment goes.
I don't think they're going to have to reach that, but Thomas's opinion is real short, about nine pages.
Little history too about, you know, the things that the most powerful things in the constitution are the things that were put in there on purpose.
That was put in there on purpose to prevent against tyranny, to prevent against dictatorship, to prevent against fascism.
All things that Biden has introduced into our government that he, that he claims that Trump will do that Trump never did.
And that he did.
So this will go back.
And here's the thing for sure.
It won't get back to the court until after the election.
She will make a completely dishonest opinion.
The Court of Appeals to the District of Columbia will, nine times out of 10, concur in that with their left-wing, anti-Trump, J6-hating court.
And then the Supreme Court will have to straighten it out again.
But if it were honestly applied, The entire case would be thrown out because it's too close to the line.
That's what an honest judge, Republican, Democrat, the kinds of judges that I used to appear before and remember in the old days when we had a democracy and a nation of laws.
So now it's time to take a look at, and you're probably bored with it by now, so I'm going to try to do it quickly, but I want to make a point Last, I was going to make first, because it's the one that isn't emphasized enough.
We keep analyzing Biden's performance from its political impact.
Most people believe, including these many Democrats who are now in panic that they're going to lose to Trump.
I mean, you don't get the New York Times telling Biden to drop out.
Except for the fact, not for the good of the Republic.
They should have told them that a year ago, two years ago, when he couldn't walk up the stairs.
You know, when he thought he was talking to dead people.
I mean, he's been out of it and unfit to hold the office of president from the day he walked in.
And he's done tremendous damage and gotten people killed.
But that didn't bother the Times.
You know why the Times wants him out?
Because they think he's going to lose to Trump.
And that's why all of them do.
The Atlanta Constitution, Scarborough and his wife, who just a week or so ago told us how healthy and wonderful and vital and he's the best he's ever been.
Biden's the best he's ever been.
Within minutes of the debate, you know, wants to hang up.
Joe, maybe when you're a crook like you are, you really don't have good friends.
And you know something?
They all lie.
But they know what a big liar and crook you are.
It's really amazing when they accuse Trump of lying during the debate.
What they're looking at really are things they disagree with.
So they consider it like, for example, if I say the election of 2020 was fixed, they'll say I'm lying.
I'll say it's my opinion.
You're lying.
That's the kind of stuff they're doing with Trump.
Or maybe an exaggeration, you know, thousands instead of hundreds.
Biden has spent his whole life lying.
It's going to be hard to find a day in which he didn't lie.
He lies about things that are insane.
But here's the thing that we haven't spent enough time on.
Sure, he shouldn't run for president.
He shouldn't be president.
This is a matter of national security.
Now you may want to live in your own silly left-wing messed up Marxist world if you want, but there isn't a sound person, not necessarily all good people, but a smart terrorist leader of a dictatorship, head of a drug group that watches that and doesn't say, wow, we got a patsy there.
Man, they got nobody guarding that country.
What?
A complete jackass.
He doesn't even concede that the border is open.
Good!
Let me just come in again.
I mean, his own... I mean, the guy that has fixed, you know, ten cases for him.
Crooked is... Ray says there are more terrorists in this country than ever before.
When you ask him why, he urinates in his pants.
We know why.
Because he didn't say anything for three years, when Biden invited them in, and they all came in, and of course they were terrorists then, just as they are now.
And now he's afraid there's going to be a terrorist act he's going to get blamed for.
Well, he sure as hell is going to get blamed for it.
In fact, he should go to jail for it.
But he'll tell you there are more terrorists here than ever before.
It's because of him.
That's because he invited them here.
He told them to come to the border that he'd put off for a year assessing them.
He tells you he's going to close the border.
He's letting 3,200 a day in.
Plus, he's letting an untold number in by parole, which he does specially by himself.
Which is way beyond the powers that he possesses because he's supposed to do that just for individual cases.
He's doing thousands and thousands of them.
He's probably done a million of them.
And that's mostly for his friend China.
Because he wants to make sure he gets the right people in.
He doesn't want him on that list.
He wants to pay the cartels a fortune to bring in, from his point of view, the right people who can move when he wants them to.
I mean, these are all things that, uh, uh, I don't know if he's aware of them or he's not aware of them or, but it doesn't matter anymore.
This country is entitled to protection.
Do you realize how many women and children are getting raped and murdered and killed by these people?
I, I was in charge of immigration for Ronald Reagan and we had Mariolitos and we didn't have anything like this.
This is unprecedented.
No country under the pressures that we're under, with the enemies that we have, has ever taken, you know, the barn door and just opened it completely and said, come on in and take us.
Come and rape our women.
Come and kill our children.
Oh, and by the way, you make a lot of money on drugs, but there's another business you can go into.
It's called human trafficking.
And we can, under Biden, we set a lot of records, like we're the biggest human trafficker in the world now, under Joe Biden.
He talked about fentanyl and how he's brought the border down by 40%.
Where the hell has he been?
40%!
40%!
The last time that Trump was in office we had about 400,000 come in.
Last year we had 3.5 million.
That's like 400%!
We're going to take a short break and we'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
Introducing the Silver Prepper Bar, crafted from .999 pure silver and proudly made in the USA.
This tangible, divisible asset can come in handy even in the toughest of times.
Portable, perforated, and easily tradable, the Silver Prepper Bar is your lifeline in times of crisis.
When facing inflation, currency devaluation, and financial meltdown, Silver Prepper Bars provide peace of mind.
Don't wait for disaster to strike.
Secure your future today with the exclusive Silver Prepper Bar.
The only silver bar on the market, divisible into three different sized pieces for maximum utility, all while fitting in your wallet.
Don't leave your future to chance.
Order your Silver Prepper Bars now at PrepperBar.com.
Silver Prepper Bars, ready for whatever tomorrow brings.
Order now!
You all know I stand by the truth.
And if I put my name on something, I truly believe in it.
Today, I'm thrilled to introduce you to something I'm incredibly proud of.
My own brand of organic specialty coffee, Rudy Coffee.
Believe me when I say it's the best coffee you'll ever try.
It's smooth, rich, chocolatey, and gentle on your stomach.
It's so good, I even recommend drinking it black.
It comes in three varieties, including what I promise is the best decaf you'll ever have.
You can order now by scanning the QR code on your screen or by visiting Rudy.Coffee.
By supporting Rudy Coffee, you're not just treating yourself to exceptional coffee, you're also supporting our cause.
The cause of truth, justice, and American democracy.
You'll also be supporting the call to action non-profit, which is devoted to helping veterans and first responders.
So you can make a difference and taste the difference by ordering today at Rudy.Coffee.
This is Rudy Giuliani back with the Rudy Giuliani Show.
Well, um, I mean, there's no reason to go over that debate completely.
There are a couple that really did it right from the beginning.
Ted, do we have our, um, we have our, we have our ammunition lined up?
We'll have it lined up tomorrow.
We'll make sure our friends at Frank have it.
No, no, no.
I want to make sure that, are we going to play?
Are we going to play right now?
No, we don't.
Okay.
But what I wanted to do, and we'll do it in the next hour and we'll do it again tomorrow night, I want to show you him walking in.
Because the moment he walked in and he made that wave to a non-existent audience, I said, oh my God, this time the medicines didn't work.
Because I was convinced they're going to pump him up the way they did for the State of the Union.
But I wasn't counting on the fact, the State of the Union, he gets to read it like he did the day after.
But you can't tell me that he wasn't, they say that sometimes he does things in his pants.
You can't tell me he wasn't doing things in his pants facing Donald Trump.
I know they spend a lot of time on how he profoundly screwed up and proved that he's unfit to be President of the United States.
And it's a danger to our national security.
But Trump did a magnificent job, which, of course, they won't say.
First of all, he did none of the things they say he was going to do.
He didn't interrupt.
He followed their rules.
He was respectful to the moderators.
He didn't show the kind of man that they claim would, you know, end democracy.
Of course, he never showed it in four years as a president.
Biden did.
Biden is the one who prosecuted his enemies.
Trump didn't prosecute Hillary.
I think he should have, but he didn't.
This is all a projection, which they get away with.
That's a Marxist principle.
So they say, he's going to be a dictator.
Well, they are dictators.
They are with regard to me.
I can give you a chapter and verse of what they've done to me.
They certainly are with regard to Trump.
And I am tremendously distraught today that my friend Steve Bannon is in jail.
And I think they put him in jail to shut him up.
He's not getting out until a couple of days before the election.
I mean, he's got one of the most powerful shows.
And he talks to our base better than anyone, better than me.
I can't say better than the president, but, you know, you need somebody to reinforce it.
But I work with him, you know, day in and day out in the 16 campaign.
And President Trump was an unbelievable candidate, but Steve Bannon was a big part of that and missing his voice right now.
They don't just go after you for the hell of it.
The day this criminal announced, he wrote a letter to the press telling to keep me off television.
I kind of took it as a compliment.
Because I was kicking the hell out of him.
He should have been indicted four years ago.
Please let me remind you, and you will hear this a lot from me because nobody else points it out.
When they say there is no evidence that Joe Biden got any of the money, there is very strong, powerful, admissible evidence That he received millions and millions and millions of dollars over a 30-year period, which would qualify him for probably the biggest RICO case in the history of this country.
And I would be so honored to prosecute it, since I revived and really taught people how to use RICO.
It's a perfect application, and the one text from Hunter to his daughter would be the fulcrum of the case.
For 30 years, I've been giving my father half my salary.
Thank you, Hunter.
And I would like to say to all of you, that is what, for 800 years in Anglo-American law, we call evidence.
So when they say, for example, you can't call the migrants illegal aliens, that happens to be what the statute calls them 13 times.
That's what the United States Congress describes them as.
If we want to be precise about who we're talking about under the law, we're talking about illegal aliens, not undocumented angels, illegal aliens.
And I don't even want to compare them to who used to come in because Biden really has made a pact, either directly or indirectly, with Satan here, namely the Cartels.
There's an article in the post over the weekend about how much the Mexican cartels love Biden.
And they're really worried about Trump being president.
Well, they should be.
Trump was kicking the hell out of them with Remain in Mexico.
What Remain in Mexico did was, and I'll get my famous map out for you and show you how I would patrol the border.
But what it does is it moves enforcement to the other side of the line.
Instead of being behind the eight ball and fighting them here in the US, we're fighting them in Mexico, which means we're also figuring out who the cartels are, who's running the cartels.
We're figuring out with our tremendous ingenuity by one of our greatest agencies, DEA, which doesn't have some of the problems FBI has.
I mean, look what we did to Columbia.
I can tell you that.
From the time I was a young prosecutor until The time I was U.S.
Attorney and this span Republican and Democratic administrations, we kicked the hell out of Colombian drug dealing.
We could disable those cartels in a year, less.
And if you want to take a look at the evidence of the amount of drugs coming in, Biden, among other things, after he did his little wave, he said, That he's reduced the amount of fentanyl that's come into the United States.
Reduced it?
It's up 40%!
20% the first year.
30% the second year.
40% the third year.
They're records.
No one has ever come close to letting in the amount of fentanyl that he has let in.
No one has come close to having so many people die of fentanyl.
I know, not just Trump.
Trump could have defended Obama.
Nobody has ever let as many migrants, illegal aliens in.
Nobody has done it.
And he's continuing to do it.
His new program to seal the border will let about 2 million illegals in.
The most Trump ever let in was last year, he let in 430,000, most of which he got rid of.
From Biden's last complaint, it was 3.5 million that we know of.
And now we're assured with his 2,500 and his parole and his CBP-1 program, we're assured about 1.8 million, which would be a record except for him.
So we don't have to compare him.
When we say he's the worst president with regard to immigration, that's not just compared to Trump.
He's disaster compared to Trump.
He's the worst president than Obama.
He's the worst president than Bush.
He's the worst president than Clinton.
He's the worst president than Bush.
He's the worst president.
Want me to keep going?
We've never had an invasion like this.
Closest thing we had was when his model, I guess, Jimmy Carter, and boy, he's making Jimmy Carter look good, got taken by Castro and said, send them all in.
And Castro said, like Maduro has said, yeah, I'll send them all in.
Get me the insane asylum.
Let them all out.
How many we got there, 400?
Send them in with the 2,000 good ones.
Everyone will know the difference.
They're a bunch of jackasses.
This idiot wants me to send them all.
I'll send them all.
Yeah, and what do you got in the prisons?
How about the convicted murderers?
Put them at the top of the list.
That's exactly what Castro did.
His successor, communist successor, Maduro, would be stupid not to have done the same thing.
Does anybody tell you that crime is down in Venezuela by 60%?
Do you notice how many of these murderers, rapists, And pigs and animals are Venezuelan?
Yeah, a whole bunch of them.
And if they're not from Venezuela, they're from Ecuador.
If they're not from Ecuador, they're from Haiti.
If they're not from Haiti, they're from all over.
And nobody vets them.
The Chinese are asked four questions.
That's so the spies can get in quick.
They want to get, you know, look, the Chinese want to get their money's worth out of the 31 million that they gave to the Biden crime family.
And the Biden crime family, have they come back from Camp David yet?
They were up there huddling.
Can you imagine actually even putting this out?
Hunter Biden thinks he should remain as president.
Well, of course Hunter Biden thinks he's going to remain as president.
Any other president, he'd go away for the rest of his life.
We'd start to take a look at his being a traitor and getting a lot of that classified material to the Chinese.
I mean, Smith is screwing around with this phony case about classified documents with Trump.
Trump never put us in danger with those documents.
For a whole year, a Chinese spy was passing those documents every day that Biden put there.
And the other ones were put in an institute that was funded by China.
The crooked press doesn't tell you that.
How can you even justify indicting Trump but not him?
Because you're crooked!
Because you're a fascist.
And because you're a Marxist.
That's why.
The same reason that Soros can appoint all these prosecutors who let these people go free.
All those people that were burning things and going after Jewish people and going after Israel in New York.
They all were set free by the same guy that prosecuted Trump on the phony charges in New York.
With two judges that are an absolute disgrace.
Well, this has been our initial show, the Rudy Giuliani show, on Frank Speech.
I've really enjoyed it.
I hope you have.
I'm going to be on X and a whole bunch of other places right after this.
But you also can listen to my good friend, who's coming up at what time, Ted?
Lou Dobbs is coming up at 8?
Yeah.
And Lou is just terrific.
I'll tell you what you can do.
You can watch him and then you can watch me on X because I'm on all night.
No, no, it's only one hour, but it plays over and over and over again.
And I get more people that watch me after than before.
So you'll be with the, you'll be with the, with the crew that, um, uh, the big group.
And tonight we're going to go into a little more of this, but, um, we got a lot of other stuff to cover.
So pray for the people of Israel, pray for the people of the United States and God bless America.
See you tomorrow.
Buy one of our MyPillow 2.0s, you get another MyPillow 2.0 absolutely free.
Made with cooling technology, the best pillow ever just got even better.
And this just in, nine brand new colors and styles of our percale bedsheets.
They're made with the finest long staple cotton, and now you can save 50% or more.
That's as low as $24.98.
And for the first time this year, I'm bringing you my slippers and sandals for as low as $25 a pair.
So go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code to get your MyPillow 2.0s.
Buy one, get one free.
Per kale sheets, as low as $24.98.
My slippers and sandals, as low as $25 a pair.
And for a limited time, when you order $75 or more, your entire order ships absolutely free!
Mike Lindell here.
And like you, I see our country being destroyed daily.
We face massive economic issues.
And I can tell you from first-hand experience, there are people in power who threaten the values that have made our country great.
I've been a believer in gold and silver for a long time, and I've searched for years for a partner that shares my values.
Well, Genesis Gold Group showed me how easy it is to protect your IRA, 401k, or your retirement with gold and silver.
Their faith-driven approach to service and stewardship is one that stands out from the rest.
So call Genesis Gold Group now at 1-800-200-GOLD.
That's 1-800-200-4653.
1-800-200-GOLD, that's 1-800-200-4653 or go to LyndaleGoldRush.com now.
The beef industry takes another blow as cricket burgers win America's Best Burger for the
fourth year in a row.
This comes after many major beef processing plants have shut their doors for good.
to take a dive. As crickets move from the sky to the red, the insatiable insects have
now overtaken cows as America's favorite animal. A market change that has even caused
McDonald's to go bankrupt. As crickets have thousands now of insect species, which means
they will no longer be seen as food for the cows, we're only in danger of being eaten
by the crickets. And here's why that might not be such a bad thing. Consider this. Cows
will go extinct. We're a community of proud, fearless patriots who aren't afraid of wearing
our values on our sleeve.
We are Honor Bound USA, and we proudly declare our declaration to God, family, and country.
▲
Export Selection