All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 3, 2023 - Rudy Giuliani
01:24:26
America's Mayor Live (E247): Kevin McCarthy OUSTED as Speaker of the House
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening, it's Rudy Giuliani back with America's Mayor Live, and this time from Manchester, New Hampshire, home of the first-in-the-nation primary, which is coming up in a couple months.
It's definitely, definitely now in heavy campaign season.
For the first test at the ballot box.
You sometimes get confused between the first caucus and vote, kind of, which is in Iowa, but it's not a primary vote.
It's a caucus vote, where people go to a special designated place and spend some time there, listen to speeches, and make a vote.
So it's a very fairly small electorate, fairly narrow electorate.
Not to say that it isn't an important first indication of who's ahead or who can do well or who can do well in certain types of electorates, but it's not as big a test as New Hampshire, live free or die, because that's your first real test at the ballot box.
And it gets a little bit more even broad-based than you would think because independents are allowed to vote in the party of their choice.
So, for example, this particular primary will be overwhelmed with independents because there's hardly really a democratic primary.
Biden has elected to double-cross New Hampshire.
I hope the people of New Hampshire remember this in November and do away with tradition of the first in the nation primary because Biden, Biden is all manipulation and no substance because he's going to lose.
He lost the, uh, I think in every election he's been in, he's lost in New Hampshire primary.
And I think with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
on the ticket, he would lose it again.
So instead of coming here and doing battle and telling you why he'd be a better choice than Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
or what's the woman's name, Williamson.
He skips it for South Carolina, which is the first primary and might have been the only primary would have won if it weren't for if it weren't for the fact that the party bosses got together like they did for Hillary and organized a nomination for him and pushed and pushed everybody out of the way, in particular, you know, Bernie Sanders.
Bernie probably likes that.
I mean, Bernie's the only guy that's been double-crossed so often and comes back for more double-crossing that you wonder if it isn't part of his personality that he likes to be double-crossed.
But hey, everybody to their likes and dislikes, huh?
Isn't that the way it goes?
Well, I'm sure You're all quite interested in, as I am, what just happened today in Foggy Bottom, or what do we call it, the pit?
I like to call it Sodom and Gomorrah.
But in any event, quite a surprise, even to me, that McCarthy was ousted.
Still weird when you think about it.
It is our system, but it's kind of weird that he'd be pushed out.
How many Republicans voted against him?
Six or eight?
Something like that?
Six, eight Republicans voted against him?
The entire Republican caucus voted for him at something like a 90 to 10.
If we did it in percentages, it's probably a 90% vote.
And he loses because Matt Gaetz and a couple of his friends decide that he isn't conservative enough.
He played baseball with the Democrats.
He waited too long to resolve the government closure issue.
He didn't change enough things.
He should have tried to do a budget based on regular order.
In other words, passing bills on each one of the eight or so revenue Items that makes up the overall budget, each one should have had a separate vote.
And that would have been better now.
I'm not an expert on House of representative politics.
And I don't mean that sarcastically because it is its own.
It's own deep kind of traditional form of politics and it works in a certain way and there are things you would need to know about it to know how to operate it correctly or not and there probably are a lot better people to evaluate what happened here than me.
It just seems to me that this is not the right time for my party, the party that is the only party right now positioned to save America, to have this kind of Fairly limited, not very meaningful battle.
It doesn't seem to me we battled over anything that helps us remove the democratic dictatorship from this country, and that's what it is.
It almost strikes me that Matt Gates, who I like and generally agree with because he supported President Trump loyally.
I don't know what Matt was fighting for.
Now, it is a lot of it is internal.
Even if you don't, even if you discount what McCarthy says that it was personal, a lot of it was internal house mumbo jumbo.
I agree.
But it's not as if they both don't agree that Donald Trump should be elected and they both don't agree that everything has to be done to maximize the vote in 24 so that we either defeat Biden or whatever other autocrat tries to take his place.
It seemed to me that McCarthy got some good things done.
I think that even with the continuing resolution, which maybe you couldn't have, maybe no one in the world could have done much better than that when you consider the reality of the numbers of votes, to get the To get the prevention, even the hold back of money for Ukraine was a plus and a good one because we wanted to make a statement about Ukraine.
And the statement about Ukraine is not necessarily we want to defund Ukraine completely or that we want to walk out on Ukraine and let Russia win.
The statement is, do we know why we're spending the money and are we spending it accountably?
It seems to me we don't have a purpose.
We're not engaged in war in the sense that we're legally engaged in war or our troops are in harm's way, but we are engaged in war in the sense that we're supporting a war.
We're funding it, if it weren't for us.
And in this case, Europe has put in a lot of the funding.
This is not one where we've been given the only burden, but we have put in a tremendous amount of money.
So we are supporting a war, and it doesn't seem to me we know the end, which is contrary to everything theoretically we've learned from the Vietnam War and some of the other wars that we've been in, that we should not be in a war when we don't have a defined conclusion.
What's victory?
What constitutes victory in this war?
Well, is it the expulsion of Russia from Ukraine?
Because if it is that, then we have to support it a lot more than we do.
Because we're not at the level at which we are supporting them.
It doesn't appear as if they'll be able to throw Russia out.
And the second objection that I have to it, which is a very big one, is I have no confidence at all that the amount of money we're giving them bears any relationship to what is going on in terms of winning this war, because I have no confidence that that money is getting in the way it should to the field.
I know that country better than most, and I know what I know about the country, not the people.
The nation, the structure, you can't get much more crooked than that.
They like to say it's the second most crooked nation in the world.
I don't know that there's really much of a distinction when you get that crooked.
And the question is, how much gets to the battlefield?
If you think all of it does, then you shouldn't be part of this analysis, because you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
A lot of it doesn't get there.
And I don't see anything serious being done to stop Biden from doing that.
And I have no doubt that Biden's being compromised is one of the reasons why we have so little control over the money.
I think another president without the serious, serious crimes that were committed with Ukraine that is well known to the leadership of Ukraine, Maybe better known than even to the United States.
I seriously doubt that any president would give the money without the lack of controls that Biden has done.
I know no one raises this because he gets such incredibly corrupt support, but Normally, when you would give away that kind of money, you would accompany that with auditing requirements.
In other words, you want accountability.
It'd be like investing money in a business.
It's a very large amount of money in a business.
You want reports back.
On how that money is being spent, or you want the kind of transparency that allows you to see how it's being spent.
We don't have that.
And Biden has refused to do that.
Now, those measures should not have passed.
They shouldn't have passed.
And since we have a House majority, we should have blocked that.
We should have refused to give a penny to Ukraine without their accounting for it.
Without our having a mechanism in place that the House of Representatives majority is satisfied with.
Now that's our fault, and if that's McCarthy's fault, then that's maybe one of the things he had to pay for.
But I don't know if that is what they're troubled about, because I haven't heard that.
I hear the general objection to too much money for Ukraine, but then I don't hear any explanation of How we're going to deal with that, and I don't know if we're objecting to it for the right reason.
If we objected to it for the right reason, we could still give money to Ukraine, less, but we could be sure it was being more effective.
And maybe we could really be helping the people of Ukraine rather than the politicians of Ukraine with whom we have committed Enormous numbers, at least we've committed crimes at an enormously high level, completely unaddressed by us or by them.
If you think about it, part of the impeachment of Trump, the first one really was to cover up the corruption, the ongoing corruption between the United States government and the Ukraine government.
There's an ongoing corruption between our two governments because we share We share very, very big, deep, corrupt secrets.
Simple.
They know exactly how much money Biden got and how much is sitting in foreign accounts.
They got the numbers of the foreign accounts.
They got a woman who's willing to give it to us, but the FBI won't talk to her.
So if they have a woman who's willing to give it to us, they probably know everything that woman knows, plus more.
They also know the other American politicians who got fat off Ukraine, and I'm assured that there are others.
I was told, I'll tell you exactly what I was told.
I was told by a legitimate Ukrainian investigator that one of the reasons they're going to stop you, Giuliani, is if they open this up on Biden, it opens up on a lot of people.
A lot of Democrats are going to go down in Washington and a couple in your own party.
It's a quote.
A lot of Democrats and a couple in your own party.
And I'm not... Number one, I'm not hiding an awful lot from you if I hide from you my speculation about that because I can't put names on all that.
And to the extent that I can, it would be highly irresponsible because I don't have the proof.
And I don't do that.
I know Democrats like to think I do, but I don't.
I'm not like...
I'm not like Goldman, and I'm not like Shifty Schiff and Swalwell.
If I accuse you of something, there's a body of evidence this big, which is what exists against Biden, even way before I made the first accusation.
I went and interviewed the people.
I don't interview them after.
I interview them before, and I have it on tape.
You can see it at RudyGiulianiCS.com.
Podcasts 1 to 12 with one or two interrupted for other things.
I don't say things.
I say things that I have support for.
It's the thing that all the Biden people coming after me in all these different cases want to ignore.
I've got backup for everything that I say.
So I don't know what's going to happen now.
We're going to end up with a speaker.
It's not going to be McCarthy. Will he be able to achieve more?
Maybe.
Maybe.
I doubt it's going to be substantially more until there's a change in the structure and we have more votes.
Or we have more unity.
I mean, he had the votes, except for a few, and therefore he's not Speaker.
Ted, get me the exact vote of Republicans.
Just the numbers are rather strange because he's got a big majority of Republicans in terms of percentage than even President Reagan, even President Trump.
It's described by Rich Lowry, admittedly, somewhat of a rhino, right?
If not somewhat of a big, kind of a big rhino.
But he does call it a goofy gamble with the Republicans' limited leverage.
And I would say he's right.
I don't see the point of all this work on this when we could have been working on something far more important like what I'm talking about Ukraine and the kinds of controls that we should have over Ukraine, which would be a positive, a very, very positive thing to do.
Meanwhile, our next president is sitting in a courtroom in New York.
In what is a much more dangerous case than it has been described or seen, or even as described by our president himself, because I'm not sure he realizes how important the case is.
He knows how important the case is in terms of the unfairness to him.
I think he realizes the unfairness to his family.
I wonder if he realizes the historic danger of this, of this case.
When have you ever heard of a case in which an American government is trying to take away someone's businesses and property without proof of a crime even?
There are limited situations in which it can be done.
Property used in pursuance of a drug crime can be taken.
Property used in pursuance of a racketeering enterprise can be taken.
After proof, substantial proof, and a trial.
Here there's no crime alleged.
Fraud that he alleged is a meaningless, benign fraud in which no one lost any money and no one is complaining but the abstract government.
And the government wasn't cheated.
So the government's complaining about what one would regard as a tree that fell in the forest and no one heard it.
And that probably was good for pruning.
I mean, this is a meaningless crime.
And not a crime, because it's not charged as a crime.
Meaningless.
Wrong.
I'm not sure it's even a tort.
I'm not sure I know what it is.
He put down what they say are the wrong numbers on a piece of paper.
And people lost no money.
And in fact made money.
Maybe you should put down the wrong numbers more often if people make money.
It's stupid.
It's exceedingly stupid and it may be something that only could happen in a corrupt city and state like New York with our two feckless leaders who are running off complicating the situation at the border or complicating the situation for migrants much more than even in most other states.
Because one, they don't know what the hell they're doing and they're both in politics for all the wrong reasons.
She's trying to make a big score on the Buffalo Stadium and looks like he's trying to give out contracts to all his pals for homelessness.
I mean, the amounts of money we spend on homelessness, a billion dollars or half a billion dollars to one company.
And again, with no controls because we're in an emergency.
We've been in an emergency now for a long time.
I think the Democrats would like to make it permanent, then they can give away even more money to their friends.
I mean, the one that I really want to tell you about, dying to tell you about, as an example, is the one typical of him and her, meaning Adams and Hochul, where she gave away She bought in a no-bid contract, because it's an emergency, like all the ones he's putting out, the 500 million that he put out for homelessness, for example, no bid to a guy
Uh, has since had to resign, whose name was Capone.
Isn't that funny?
So she, Hockel during her campaign had to purchase very, very quickly lots of COVID
tests even though COVID was over, but she spent 600, she spent 600 million.
on it.
Thank you.
That's a lot of million, right?
It turns out half of it wasn't necessary and half of it ended up being precisely the amount of money that went to her to her pack.
Something like that.
They do this all the time.
And get away with it.
And Trump is sitting there Having cost no one any money at all.
Not a penny.
And with a judge who doesn't seem to know his backside from his elbow.
Who doesn't even have a nice smile.
He's like a goofball.
And who just evaluated as part of the alleged false evaluation, Mar-a-Lago, With a value of $18 million.
Now, I don't know if you know Mar-a-Lago, but that may be, that may be the valuation, that probably is less than the valuation of the beach house.
That's right on the beach.
The house next to it, to the beach house, is probably valued at about $20 or $25 million.
Just one house.
On the beach.
With one-tenth of the property of Mar-a-Lago is valued at more than he valued that.
He couldn't have looked at comparables.
I know the comparables.
I know the real estate in Palm Beach.
I don't know the exact value of Mar-a-Lago, but if you told me half a billion or a billion, somewhere between that vast universe, I would tell you, yeah.
Yeah, I mean, in a way, it's a bit of an abstract value because the question is, who's going to buy it?
And why are they going to buy it?
And that would determine the value of it.
I mean, if someone wanted to buy it as a personal home of gigantic proportions with a big family, or if somebody wanted to turn it into a commercial enterprise, it could be differences of hundreds and hundreds of thousands.
So, I don't know what he put down as the value of it, but if he put down a billion dollars, it'd be hard to dispute it.
I think you'd get assessors that would come in and do that.
Now, I understand he made this valuation without any expert assessors from Palm Beach.
First of all, how do you make it without one?
how do you make it without one? And how does Jerko come up with 18 million?
It makes the case wacky?
Appear crazy wacky?
This is also a case that LaCheshia James has brought as part of her dishonest, unethical campaign running for Attorney General as a one-issue candidate.
And the one issue is get Donald Trump.
So now you've got this weird case of of so-called fraud with no one having been hurt brought by A prosecutor with a clear vendetta announced in advance, promised as part of her running for office, which should have resulted in her losing or being removed from office.
Because a prosecutor promising to headhunt for one person should never be a prosecutor.
Should be removed as a prosecutor.
That's unethical.
But she wasn't.
She was encouraged by the crooked Democratic Party to do what she did.
And you see her in court looking lost.
I don't even know if she knows what happens in a courtroom.
She's not much of a lawyer, otherwise she'd be prosecuting the case herself, which I think is a good indication of just how incapable she is that she can't prosecute it herself.
And don't tell me you're all that busy, my dear, because you wouldn't have been sitting in a gallroom doing nothing if you're all that busy.
If you can sit in the courtroom watching, you can sit in the courtroom working.
If you know what you're doing.
And I bet you don't try any cases.
Because a lot of these make-believe prosecutors don't try any cases.
Because they're too afraid.
Because they're a bunch of bullies.
So we'll take a short break.
And when we come back, we'll take a look at a couple of the reactions today.
of the participants.
So would you get me my, uh, Dowers Foundation delivers on its promise to do good and never forget the sacrifices America's greatest heroes have made for us.
Heroes who risked their lives to keep our communities and our country safe.
Heroes like United States Marine Corps Captain and pilot John Jeremy Sachs.
Captain Sachs sustained fatal injuries when his military aircraft crashed during training, killing him and five other service members.
He's remembered by loved ones as courageous, brilliant, and devoted to his career, family, and friends.
John is survived by his wife, Amber, who gave birth to their second daughter three months after his death.
Tunnel to Towers paid the mortgage on the family home for Amber and their two daughters.
The foundation has helped over 1,000 military and first responder families navigate the worst of times by removing the burden of a mortgage payment.
Our nation's heroes and their families need your help now more than ever.
Donate $11 a month to Tunnel to Towers at T2T.org.
T2T.org, that's T, the number two T.org, T2T.org.
Please, donate now.
Welcome back to America's Mayor Live.
And I thought, why don't we kind of get a, why don't we kind of get a sense Let me kind of get a sense of Trish, of Tish James.
Oh, I have that from yesterday.
And if you're ready, I was going to just play it.
I have it right here.
here. This is Tish James when she was running as a highly unethical candidate
for... on the... let's see here we go...
here we are...
are. Basically, she said, I don't know if you heard that.
She said that, will you sue him for us, I think, and she said, we'll be a real pain in
the ass.
She didn't indicate what she would sue him for, because I don't think she had figured it out yet.
In other words, this was a candidate who had a person to prosecute, and then she was in search of a crime.
Then after that, she would find the crime to prosecute him for, or, and then she could find no crime to prosecute him, so she came up with this phony with this completely phony civil case. And then how about
this one where she engages in language of insurrection? And this we should turn over to to Smith, to
Jack Smith. I'm running for attorney general because I will never be afraid to challenge this
illegitimate president when our fundamental rights are at stake. She doesn't sound like
she's sincere, does she? I'm running for attorney general because I will never be afraid to
challenge this illegitimate president when our fundamental rights are at stake.
I don't know.
You think she was involved in January 6th?
Hmm.
Illegitimate president.
I thought you weren't supposed to do that.
I thought you went to jail.
And District of Columbia, you can go to jail for 20 years if you get in front of those Trump derangement syndrome judges and prosecutors.
But I mean, it's okay for her to say illegitimate president and for her to be an election denier?
She's an election denier.
We have an attorney general in New York that's an election denier.
Except she's denying the election that's okay for the liberals to deny.
It's okay for her to deny those.
The reality is that this entire case is part of a group of cases, including the four others that are up for trial next year, that are brought all and only by Democratic Prosecutors and democratic political structures in places with crooked democratic political structures, whether it's the District of Columbia or Atlanta or New York.
I mean, you could have found a couple more corrupt cities like Detroit and Philadelphia if you wanted to, Chicago.
Places like that.
Let's see if we can pick up on...
illegitimate political institutions, crooked ones, where we have politically appointed judges, which is what we have in New York.
I don't know if I have to again go and explain to you the facade or the phoniness of the judges being elected in New York when they are selected by the political party, the hacks, they're selected by the leaders of the political party.
Literally and figuratively in the smoke-filled back room.
So if your name is on the ballot in New York as a Supreme Court justice, that's our trial court justice.
That's what the guy who thinks Mar-a-Lago is worth $18 million.
He's a Supreme Court justice elected by the people of New York City.
Except I think he was unopposed, like elected in the Soviet Union.
And he was unopposed because he was selected by the one party that dictates what goes on in the city, the Democrat Communist Party.
So you realize the election thing is phony, right?
It's like Putin gets elected.
Or Z gets elected.
I remember when the old Soviet Union existed, people like Khrushchev and whatever used to get 97, 98% of the vote.
I think Judge Engeron got 97% of the vote.
So he is a Democrat potentate.
He's a Democrat.
And I think when you get elected that way, you're entitled to be described as a hack politician.
Right?
I mean, you don't get elected and the election is to fool the public.
And when you get elected that way, based on the selection by a party boss, and that's who selects them, the Manhattan Party boss, you owe everything to the party.
So in a case like this, where the party needs you to block the election of a Republican president, like the parties are doing in Georgia and elsewhere, you join in with them and you do your part.
If it requires recounting and phoning up election ballots like wasn't necessary in New York, but was necessary in crooked Democrat Philadelphia or crooked Democrat Atlanta, you do that.
If it requires making phony court decisions, like something that's worth a billion dollars is worth only 18 million, you do it!
If you have to render a decision like in Pennsylvania, where the law says that you must be present for the counting of a vote, present can mean just being in the room But you don't have to see anything.
The other party can block you from seeing anything as long as you're in the room, as opposed to present in a meaningful way.
That's the kind of crooked, phony decisions that are called upon you when you are a political hack judge.
And so we see a whole circle now of this thing and of what the Democrats are doing to us.
They're making us into something that is, well we are certainly now, today, as opposed to four or five years ago.
We're moving closer to China rather than China moving closer to us.
We are adopting their political system with the level of welfare that we have, the level of taxation that we have, the level of dependency programs we have.
And even our legal system is becoming more like theirs.
Guilty, and cases then put in places where you're guilty before you're tried, and when you do get tried, they just affirm that you're guilty, like in the District of Columbia.
Or by judges who don't think you're entitled to bail pending trial and put you in prison for two years for interrupting a government proceeding.
Unless, of course, you're a Democratic congressman who likes to do false fire alarms in order to interrupt votes that he doesn't agree with.
And that's exactly what Jamal Bowman did the other day.
Now we're coming up with all kinds of excuses like he didn't know he was pulling the fire alarm.
This is the former principal or assistant principal of a school.
The only good thing about it is he's no longer a former principal or assistant principal of the school because he spent his life already ruining the education of enough children And turning them to the extent that he could into communists.
He's a socialist after all and I wonder if he used to pull false fire alarms for fun there when he didn't like things that were going on but in any event Yep, he pulled the fire alarm.
There's no doubt about it.
He lied about it and His Democratic crooked friends covered it up, and whereas they sit there, and they have no conscience about this, and they see the lives of these people ruined by being held without bail for endless periods of time and without trial, and they see some of these people committing suicide, this guy, like nothing's going to happen to him.
Nothing!
Zero.
He's just going to be able to be a congressman.
Yes, he.
I guess he voted against McCarthy.
It's really amazing.
I know a lot of our audience is sympathetic with getting rid of McCarthy.
And I'm not telling you you're right or wrong about that.
I am telling you you're wrong about getting rid of him based on Democratic votes, which is what you did.
We have that final vote, the breakdown of Democrats and Republicans, Ted?
I'd like to see what it was.
Had to be virtually every Democrat voted against him and every Republican but a few voted for him.
But he's gone as our leader.
Because Matt Gaetz, who was angry at him for making a deal with the Democrats, went ahead and made a fatal deal with the Democrats.
I don't get it.
I don't get the naive nature of even some of our followers.
Let's hear the vote.
That's right.
Mayor, House Speaker Kevin McCarthy was ousted from his position Tuesday night.
The final vote was 216 to 210.
216 to 210.
So eight Republicans joined all the Democrats in voting to remove McCarthy.
216 to 210. So eight Republicans joined all the Democrats in voting to remove McCarthy.
Of course, a number of... So that was 208 Democrats voted against him. Right?
Yep.
You said eight Republicans voted against him.
Yep.
So if we, if we, if those eight Republicans had abstained and not voted with the Democrats, he would have won 208 to 210.
If all, if they don't respond, if the Republicans, if only the Democrats were allowed to vote against him and no Republicans joined them, he would have had 210 votes, right?
Yep.
And they would have had 208 votes.
Yeah, well, if that was the case, for example, Pelosi probably would have been there.
Some people didn't vote, right?
So I see what you're saying.
If those eight Republicans didn't vote... In other words, if they were loyal, if they knew it had to be done, they'd have been loyal enough to show up for their party.
Yeah, yeah.
So that's interesting that Pelosi didn't vote.
She probably, as a former speaker, felt She probably felt better than she did.
I don't even know if the Democrats felt good about this.
I think they felt, you know, what the heck?
They want to create problems?
Let's create problems for them.
They're a bunch of jerks.
Let's play along.
There's 212 Democrats, 221 Republicans, and that's the makeup of the body.
212 Democrats, it appears four did not vote.
At least, that's according to, yes.
And then of course with Republicans, eight Republicans.
So 218 voted and three didn't.
Three weren't there.
That would mean three were not there.
Three were not there.
I don't know, does McCarthy vote?
Usually the Speaker doesn't vote.
But even if he had, it wouldn't have made a difference.
And even if those three had voted, it wouldn't have made a difference, it would have been, It would have been 216 to 213.
If the three missing Republicans had voted, which is why I guess they weren't dragged in, it would have been 216 to 213 because the minute, the minute eight or minute six Republicans decided to double cross them and double cross their party and join and vote with the Democrats.
Ted, why doesn't that bother them?
The Republicans have voted with the Democrats against the overwhelming numbers in their... Don't they have respect for the overwhelming numbers in their party?
I know we have this Rhino thing, but if he had 210 Republicans voting for him, Most of those people are not rhinos.
Well, let's not look at the members themselves, right?
Let's not put names to the members of Congress.
I think these members, like many of their constituents and even, of course, our audience, are so frustrated with the status quo in Washington, both Democrats and Republicans.
So we're so frustrated with the status quo in Washington, we vote with the Democrats.
So they don't look at it as a vote with the Democrats as much as they look at it as a vote against the permanent Washington political class to show that we can create change if they don't follow through with what they say they're going to do.
But they voted with the permanent Washington political class to vote out the permanent Washington political class.
They voted with the Democrats.
They voted to take down the Speaker of the House.
With the help of the enemy party, so to speak.
If there's a permanent Washington problem, it's got to be more Democrat than Republican.
So you side with the Democrats to fix the permanent Washington problem, when among those 210 Republicans are certainly plenty that are not part of the Washington problem.
And you leave them hanging out to dry.
And you disregard their wishes, because you're a genius, and you know how to fix it.
And I know the people you're talking about.
And they're very nice people.
I don't know if there's one in the genius class.
Of course, you got Matt Gaetz leading the charge.
Yeah, okay.
Ooh.
Very, very, very impressive.
Matt Gaetz.
I liked Matt until now.
I believe that this was an unnecessary, completely unnecessary blow To a party that has to remain united, if it's going to save the United States of America.
And I believe that you demonstrated to me, Matt Gaetz, that you are way ahead of, in your concern, the United States of America.
I also think our political party doesn't mean anything to you.
Because there are 210 of your colleagues that you have totally disrespected their will.
By orchestrating a very tiny, rump group of eight people, seven actually, to double-cross their wishes.
It doesn't sound like democracy to me.
It doesn't sound like party unity to me.
And it doesn't sound to me like you're putting principle ahead of anything.
In fact, I don't know what your principle is.
What is it?
What did we vote him out on?
What did he do?
He worked with the Democrats to overcome closing of government, which every Republican leader has to do, and every Democratic leader has to do, and the next one's going to do it.
And he did it with the consent of 210 Republicans.
You went ahead and worked with the Democrats with the consent of seven Republicans.
So who's the traitor to the party?
Some would argue that the party has been a traitor to the people.
That means nothing if 210 don't define more what our party is than 8, then our party is
an ademocratic party with a small d.
It's a party of whatever ideology gets control of it, as opposed to a democratic party in
which the ideology is determined by the will of the majority.
I mean, we just turned into a just another little party, an orchestrated little boss party.
The will of 210 is defeated because of the esoteric rules of the Congress.
210 Republicans are defeated because you were able to get 208 Democrats to vote with you.
Even though if you just did the Democrats, there weren't enough.
They would have to have gotten Pelosi to come back from wherever she is.
She's getting old now.
She might not have come back.
I mean, she might have been too tired.
Or she might have got lost coming back.
Any number of things could have happened.
But I don't like what happened.
I don't like what it portends for the next election.
And I think the people who like to say that we can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory and are laughing at us have something to laugh about right now.
And I think President Trump should be very concerned about this.
Because this is a danger to him because he's going to need a united party badly, given the way in which they cheat.
He's going to really need a united party because I maintain one of the reasons we couldn't prove a lot of what we couldn't prove is because we didn't have a united Republican Party.
Well, we better be.
We better be united this time.
And it looks like we are not.
So, I'm going to make sure that you all have your balance of the nature time.
It is really, really necessary to have a balanced diet.
Now, you know that.
And the reason for a balanced diet and the reason why all over television and radio and Every other form of communication, online, offline, in-between line.
People are selling various kinds of supplements, some of which are good and some of which are probably useless, and some may be bad, I don't know.
But they're doing it because people don't have the necessary ingredients that they should be having in their food.
Now, if we want to talk about necessary, and we want to get the broadest sweep there and cover the most ground, we're talking about fruits and vegetables.
And I'm telling you, give this a try, please, for my sake.
You're going to be a lot healthier.
Balanceofnature.com promo code Rudy.
You'll get a big 35% reduction on these.
And you take them.
There are plenty, plenty.
I think there are 90 in the bottle.
I think so.
I know there are a lot, it takes a long time to use them up.
90, yeah, 90.
So you take your... I have two fruit.
You got water, Mayor?
I had some.
Some little gremlin must have come here and stolen it.
You need to get it, I'll get it.
I'm gonna, you know, I'm not allowed to do this...
But Dr. Marie is not here, so I will.
Watch.
Swallowed successfully.
Thank you.
He will get me some water.
He's working on it right now.
Ted's quick.
Here we go.
But I already swallowed it, Ted.
What?
You swallowed it without water?
I swallowed just the veggie ones.
I've never been able to do that.
I've never been able to take a pill without water.
I'll do these the way I'm instructed to.
Very impressive, Mayor.
Very impressive.
So be sure to get your Balance of Nature.
Visit balanceofnature.com and be sure to use that promo code, Rudy.
R-U-D-Y.
Promo code Rudy.
You're supporting not just your own body and doing the right thing from a health perspective, but you're also supporting everything the mayor is doing right here on America's Mayor Alive.
So thanks for joining us.
Mayor, it's been a very busy, busy Tuesday in the news.
That's it.
Promo code Rudy.
Hunter Biden was in court, pled not guilty today.
Oh my goodness, what a surprise that he pled not guilty.
That was his gun case.
That's the one where the day before he signed that he wasn't a drug addict, he was driving an automobile, smoking dope.
Is that right?
So are we watching Matt Gaetz now?
I'm prepping the...
I'm prepping the clip.
I just saw Matt Gaetz.
Is that an old one, or are they back on the floor?
This is old.
I'm preparing this for the show.
With 210 Democrats that ran against him, that voted against him, right?
He must be a very popular guy in Washington tonight.
I mean, here I am, a Republican member.
I vote with 209 of my colleagues.
And this guy goes and pulls out eight that are willing or seven that are willing to vote with the enemy and I get beat.
Somehow, something about that, maybe it shouldn't Ted, but something about that really bothers me.
And it tells me you do not, you're not playing in the sandbox, pal.
When you're, you're telling me that eight members can better divine the true Republican party than 210.
In a democracy, I don't get that.
It sounds to me like you're defining your own political party for eight people.
That's not productive.
What's his goal?
I mean, he hates McCarthy because McCarthy didn't block his ethics investigations?
That's what Laura Ingraham seemed to be getting at when she was cross-examining him.
And he wouldn't admit it.
She said, oh, everybody knows that, or something like that.
And he said he was the most investigated man in Congress.
That can't be true.
Trump is.
He can't be the most investigated man.
Wait, what did he do to get investigated that much?
He couldn't have done all the things I did.
I'm more investigated than he is.
Right?
Of course.
Nobody ever took his, his uh, his iCloud account and didn't tell him, right?
Like they did with HeSteel.
The FBI stole my iCloud account and they had it for two and a half years.
Didn't even know it.
Couldn't do anything wrong if I wanted to.
And I didn't.
Although they are charging me with something, I can't figure out what it is.
Oh yeah, I'm being charged with being a lawyer.
I'm also being disbarred for being a lawyer.
Being charged with being a lawyer and being disbarred for being a lawyer.
And all of it is because Senator Donald Trump.
You want the best indication of it?
You know when they went and stole my ICOD account?
Surreptitiously, illegally, I believe.
The day I began representing Donald Trump.
No interest in me until then.
Then they got real interested.
They decided taking my ICOD account wasn't enough.
they could come and raid my house, my law office, go through my business for 20 years,
and put out one leaking lie after another, including right down to today.
Good news, it was really strange how on the show last night, we found out that
Charlotte Center was found alive.
I I saw this story in the newspapers and Dr. Maria
Often, when she's with us, puts out stories on children who are on Ambrose Alert.
In fact, we were useful in helping to find two, and this one we weren't.
It just was serendipity, but I put it up, and as I was putting it up, Ted noticed that within that hour, they had found her.
So we were able to announce on the air that she was found after having been kidnapped by a perverted creep who's now under arrest.
The creep is Craig Ross Jr., and Charlotte is in good health.
She went to the hospital to be checked out, as would be the case, right?
And I believe she's been returned home to the safe confines of her loving parents.
And you see there's a really lovely picture of them as a couple here.
The two children, I guess they have.
The Seneff family does.
They live near Saratoga Springs in New York.
You might have seen Governor Hochul on TV announcing the details of this, and she was quite emotional, as she should be, about this.
This map isn't going to mean very much, but it's right near Saratoga, where they have the very famous races in August, and it's quite a nice community, Saratoga.
And Ross, Craig Ross Jr., who committed this horrendous crime, They only have one arrest in 1999 in a DWI charge.
Well, so far.
And believe it or not, Little Charlotte was found in a cabinet cupboard.
In a cabinet cupboard.
I mean, that's really kind of weird.
Let's see if I can show you a picture.
It's rather small, Ted.
It's a picture of the nice family here.
Can we zone in on that?
It's right in the middle.
There.
Picture of the nice... Hold it up.
I have it up.
That's the family.
That's the Sena family.
S-E-N-A.
And let's give them our best wishes and pray that as she makes her, you know, Reentry into the real safe world.
Everything goes well for this beautiful young girl.
She's able to handle this, and her parents help her.
She gets the help that she needs to be able to absorb this and not have it affect the rest of her life.
It's hard to do, but not impossible.
With the right therapy, you should be able to put this in the right... After all, she didn't do anything wrong.
You're able to put this in the right... in the right context.
I handle some of these cases.
And I have to tell you, the reaction of the parents to this is so important.
Like, God forbid, you have a child that's been abused.
And I don't know that she was.
No one's saying she was.
We don't know.
We don't know what happened to her.
But if you have a child that's been abused sexually, do not panic over it.
And if you're going to panic over it, go lock yourself in a room somewhere and do it.
Don't let the kids see it.
Because you're signaling to the child how the child should react to it.
You're telling the child that something irreparable and awful happened to them.
Now, it isn't that something good happened to them, and you don't want to pretend that it did.
But was it so awful either?
And do you mark it and make it awful by the reaction that you have?
Since your children are guided, particularly at her young age, by your reaction.
And at a young age, your reaction is three times what it would be, let's say, to a 30-year-old child, who might be able to take your overreaction differently.
So what I'm pleading to you is, if you ever face a situation like this, take it way below the level of your reaction.
So you don't mark it in a certain way for the child.
It gives the child a better chance of recovering from it and being perfectly or as close to normal as possible.
Yeah, and of course it's one of the most awful things that could ever occur to a child or anyone and Just such a disturbing, disturbing story, and this individual must be held responsible to the fullest extent of the law.
Does New York have the death penalty, Mayor?
Uh, no.
But of course, nobody died here, so you wouldn't be able to use the death penalty.
Okay.
Even if New York had a death penalty, it wouldn't apply, because she didn't die.
This was a kidnapping.
It used to be a death penalty for kidnapping, but it doesn't exist any longer.
Oh my goodness, that's the worst thing I would do.
There's no death penalty in New York, and effectively there's no death penalty in New York.
In fact, we don't even have imprisonment in New York anymore.
With Alvin Bragg around.
Only for Trump and people that work with Trump.
They go to prison.
But people who beat up... Somebody knocked down some old person who was just let out today.
So he can knock down a few more.
That's why we have so much crime.
Alvin Bragg puts them out on the streets so they can beat the living daylights out of people.
Just like in Philadelphia.
You know, all this over... This crime wave is completely democratic.
All the numbers are being driven by cities with Soros-elected district attorneys, like New York, like Philadelphia.
Progressive, crooked, democratic cities, like St.
Louis, like Chicago.
Are you going to wake up for the next election, my friends?
Are you going to realize you've got to vote this party out of office?
Nationwide.
So that you do it the biggest favor ever done for it.
So that it disbands and reunites.
It gets devastated so badly.
The stench of the Democrat Party goes away.
The stench of a party of slavery.
A party of segregation.
A party of the Ku Klux Klan.
A party of Jim Crow.
A party of opposing the Civil Rights Bill.
And a party that has now in the last three years taken away more American human and civil rights than any party or any administration in American history.
Time for it to end and for a new party based on loving America is developed and it's also infected with a horrible hatred of this country.
I'll never forget the other day when Ted and I were looking outside the studio at WABC while I was doing my show, and Biden's entourage passed, and his adherents, of which there are not many, even in New York, didn't have an American flag.
I've never seen a president greet a big, long line, no American flag.
But these are the people who don't like America.
These are the ones who...
They believe that burning the flag shouldn't be a crime.
They believe that America is basically a racist country, that most of all of us are racist, except for them.
And in fact, they have the biggest racist, Joe Biden.
I think I mentioned last night, I'll just mention it again because it's so strange that Two guys that have come up with another useless vaccine got the Nobel Prize.
Catalin Carrico and Drew Weissman, they got a prize for the development of effective mRNA vaccines.
As far as I can tell, no mRNA vaccine prevents COVID.
Which means it's not a vaccine.
It means it's a medicine.
It's a treatment.
It slows the disease down, it prevents it for four months, it whatever.
A vaccine is supposed to protect you.
It's supposed to give you the equivalent of natural immunity to a disease.
And for the longest time, these lying scientists for money would tell us that the vaccine was better than natural immunity, which everybody knew was untrue.
But they just continued it, and if you said the opposite, you were banned on YouTube.
Just so more Americans could die.
Huh?
Did you ever think of that?
All that banning about masks and, you know, masks really aren't dangerous?
But they really are?
You don't think it did tremendous damage to people?
Sure did tremendous damage to mental health for children.
Well, we'll take a short break and we'll be right back here in Manchester, New Hampshire.
The year is 2022.
Cancel culture is the new normal.
Online freedom as we know it has ended.
Digital stockades are here.
All activity is monitored, stored, and predictively analyzed by a technological cartel.
We're being converted into a digital resource.
A digital currency to be farmed for metadata and loaded into a computerized combine.
Blockchained to a social engineering operating system.
However, it doesn't have to be this way.
Be part of a new technological revolution.
Right now, 1,000 test pilots have launched themselves into a new digital frontier, a private network outside the big tech control.
New technology with state-of-the-art digital engagement and never-done-before security and privacy features that are now operational.
With Quix, digital engagement, entertainment, communication, and commercial exchange will never be the same.
We are QUX.
Quix.
Advanced pre-release sales are limited to 3,000.
Order now by visiting quix.tv.
Get yours now before they sell out.
Be part of a brand new online experience that you control.
Rudy Giuliani back with you with our final segment of Thank you.
America's Mayor Live Soccer Time!
Pretty soon we're going to make this America's Mayor Live confidential and we're going to use this extra time for confidential reports because there are some times I feel uncomfortable with major dissemination of things and also we'll be hooked up for easier telephone communication so you can communicate More personal and confidential things to me as well.
It's really interesting that in order to squeeze more money to Ukraine, which I guess was voted down, right?
One of the things McCarthy accomplished was to get it voted down.
Under Secretary of Defense Michael McCord Went to the Hill yesterday and basically said, we don't have enough ammunition.
We're running out of stockpiles.
We have to replenish our U.S.
weapons stockpiles, including artillery rounds, rockets.
And missiles for Ukraine's war against Russia.
It's a little unclear what he's asking for.
It's a little unclear whether he's asking to replenish our stockpiles or give more to Ukraine.
It looks like he's trying to leverage one with the other.
Now that's a hell of a way.
That's a hell of a way for us to deal with America first, isn't it?
And in fact, even though the money for Ukraine was not part of the continuing resolution, shortly before that, maybe in anticipation of that, Schumer slipped him another $300 million.
Look, the Democrats have a close relationship with Ukraine.
We can go into this in more detail tomorrow, but the governor of New York and the mayor
of New York are being described by one of the most distinguished New York columnists
as the cowardly lions because of their approach to...
Immigration, which is to, in the case of Mayor Adams, have gone out of his way to invite them here with unbelievable promises of wonderful things that will happen to them, much better than in other cities.
He was doing this all throughout his campaign and up until about eight, nine months ago.
Until now, he doesn't like them anymore.
He still likes them, but he wants to get rid of them.
Because he's got a hundred thousand of them, maybe a hundred and ten thousand, and when he sends them off to other places, nobody wants to keep them for too long, because in one case, in Buffalo, they started raping people.
Please remember that these large hordes of make-believe asylees, because it's no more than one in ten that has even a close to a legitimate claim of asylum, that these people are selected by the Mexican cartels.
This is not just a random distribution of people.
These are people that are allowed over the border by the cartels, which means the cartels are going to want to get something out of the large, large numbers of them.
So these people would tend to be considerably more dangerous than the illegal immigrant of, let's say, two decades ago or a decade ago or This is a much more selected group.
And what do you think, Ted?
The president's been in court now for two days, not campaigning.
There's only one of these trials going on right now.
Next year, there's going to be four of them.
How do you run for president and And sitting in Manhattan courtroom.
Well, if there's somebody that can do it, it's definitely President Trump.
They're trying to jam him up.
It's just another way.
Just like with you, Mayor, the process is a big part of the punishment.
They have him sitting there in court.
But again, President Trump and Mayor Giuliani both being focused on the dozens of lawsuits each being just, you know, let's just let me rephrase that.
Let's start with President Trump.
A President Trump being distracted dealing with 12 lawsuits while running for president.
I'll take him still over a Joe Biden.
Just like with you.
And Mayor Giuliani being distracted by a dozen lawsuits.
I'll take you.
President Trump being president for a quarter of a day is a thousand times better than a yo-yo.
Or a yo-yo's assistant, ya-ya.
So they're trying to... Vice President.
Yeah, yeah.
They're doing everything they can to even the playing field because President Trump is just... I would like to introduce President Harris.
That's what he introduces it.
I'd like to introduce President Harris.
Thank you, President Harris.
President Harris, how is your mission on the border coming, as Czar of the Border?
That's very good.
That's her cackle.
Very, very good.
You're making big progress, in other words, keeping the border open.
It does seem like you're letting in a disproportionate number of criminals, Czar Harris.
Is that the case?
That's of course the mayor.
You are imitating Kamala Harris's laugh.
I am not.
I am her.
I did a perfect imitation of her.
Oh no, I have another one.
What's Ukraine?
Ukraine is a small country that is next to a big country called Russia.
And Russia, children, is a big country.
Next to a small country called Ukraine.
Very good, Vice President.
Very good!
That's so much better than the President would have done.
He would have said, uh, Colombia is a big country next to a small country called Portugal.
Now, Mr. President, there's an ocean in between them.
Oh.
Well, we'll build a bridge, like the one to India.
We'll build a bridge from Columbia to, what's that other country's name?
Port?
Portzal?
Portzal.
To Portzal.
Well, enough for Saturday Night Live, which wouldn't have the guts to touch this in a million years, right?
Can you imagine the material they have from this guy?
It's got to be ten times the material from any president that ever existed since the beginning of their show.
They used to have, you know, Ford falling down.
But he never fell down going up the steps.
Well, let's see what happens tomorrow.
I am concerned.
About what's going on in my party, and I want to see it fixed right away because I have a very, very selfish concern.
And that is I don't really give all that much of a damn right now about them.
I give a damn about America.
And they're just, they're a vessel for saving America.
I've told this to the president.
This election is much more important than him or me or you or anybody.
It's about our country and what we're going to turn over to our children.
We can't give them advantages.
I mean, you lose elections sometimes on your own errors.
Like, you lose games on your own errors.
And this one, dammit, we cannot be losing at all.
Certainly not on our own errors.
We got to overcome our differences to see our similarities.
I mean, it actually gets me so angry with the double-crossing Republicans.
I mean, sometimes it's a broader group of double-crossing Republicans.
Those eight better think really hard why they voted against the 210 and why they think they're so much damn smarter than the 210.
We've got to get this together right away.
We've got to organize this and put it behind us so we can get about the business of saving America.
Not saving it, taking it back.
We're there already.
We're at socialism.
We're at communism.
We're at forms of fascism.
What the hell do you think that case in New York is about?
Taking a man's property away in America?
We're taking, forget who it is, we're taking his property away.
That's what you do in this, that's what Stalin did.
Okay.
You have a wonderful evening.
Tomorrow night, when you come back here, If everything goes the way I think it's gonna go.
We got something planned for tomorrow.
What time should they be listening for, Ted?
11 a.m.
We're gonna shake things up a little.
Time to go on offense.
Big time.
You'll see.
Stick with us.
And I think we're going to have a fascinating show tomorrow night.
In fact, we'll be ready to talk to you about it at three on wabcradio.com.
And then we'll be able to talk to you about it and look you straight in the eye at eight on our live, on our live cast.
So this is Rudy Giuliani and, um, Tonight, say a special prayer that everything goes well tomorrow.
And say a special prayer for America.
God bless America.
God bless America.
house in the country into chaos.
Chaos is somebody who we cannot trust with their word.
The one thing that the White House, House Democrats, and many of us on the conservative side of the Republican caucus would argue is that the thing we have in common?
Kevin McCarthy said something to all of us at one point or another that he didn't really mean and never intended to live up to.
I don't think voting against Kevin McCarthy is chaos.
I think $33 trillion in debt is chaos.
I think that facing a $2.2 trillion annual deficit is chaos.
I think that not passing single-subject spending bills is chaos.
I think the fact that we have been governed in this country since the mid-90s by continuing resolution and omnibus is chaos.
And the way to liberate ourselves from that is a series of reforms to this body that I would hope Would outlast Speaker McCarthy's time here, would outlast my time here, and would outlast either of our majorities.
Reforms that I have heard some of the most conservative members of this body fight for, and some of the reforms that we've been battling for, that I've even heard those in the Democrat caucus say would be worthy and helpful to the House.
Like open amendments.
Like understanding what the budget is.
We have been out of compliance with budget laws for most of my life.
Most of many of your lives.
And by the way, if we did those things, if we had single subject bills, if we had an understanding on the top line, if we had open amendments, if we had trust and honesty and understanding, there would be times when my conservative colleagues and I would lose.
Might be a few times when we'd win.
There'd be times that we would form partnerships that might otherwise not be really predictable in the American body politic, but the American people would see us legislating.
...to Cal State.
So I sold my business, going to school.
I opened up the local paper and said, be a summer intern in Washington, D.C.
with my local congressman.
I did not know this man, but I thought he'd be lucky to have me, so I applied.
And you know what he did?
He turned me down.
But you want to know the end of the story?
I got elected to a seat I couldn't get an internship for.
I ended up being the 55th Speaker of the House.
One of the greatest honors.
I loved every minute.
Our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
It was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate From the Kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom It hears in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country.
A country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
We're able to talk.
We're able to analyze.
We are able to apply our God-given common sense.
▲
Export Selection