All Episodes
Previous Next
July 21, 2023 - Rudy Giuliani
01:17:36
America's Mayor Live (E195): Analyzing Evidence Exposing the Biden Crime Family
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Good evening, this is Rudy Giuliani and this is America's Mayor Live!
Live from New York!
And we are going to begin with a little song from a great man who passed away, a great singer.
He was considered The very best of them by Frank Sinatra, none other than Frank Sinatra, who said about this man that he has the best voice of them all.
And it kind of helped.
This may well be his most famous song.
I know it's about San Francisco, which is a distant memory.
But distant memories sometimes can spur you on to bring it back.
I've been terribly alone and forgotten in Manhattan.
I'm home to my city by the bay.
I lift my arms in San Francisco.
High on a hill, it calls to me.
you To be where little cable cars
My home To my sea by the bay
I left my heart In San Francisco
I grew up with Tony.
As a result of that, he introduced me to him.
And we had a special day for him while I was the mayor.
And he helped develop a school for performing artists, of course.
And, um...
When it came time to name the school, he told Peter, his friend, that he wanted it named after Frank Sinatra.
And I wonder, I never asked him, I would like to have asked him, is that because Frank Sinatra picked him out among, at the time, maybe eight or ten male singers who could have been described as what they call crooners.
Now, I don't know exactly where that came from.
We'll find out.
I should have found out for you where that came from, crooners.
But the reality is that that would have included Dean Martin, and Frank Sinatra, and Bing Crosby, and Vic Damone, and oh my goodness, who knows, so many others.
But they were the main, they're the main ones.
And they were all very, very good.
And he, Perry Como, many, many were Italian, by the way.
In fact, I think they may all have been, except for Bing Crosby, who strangely started it, or it may have been started by a singer you probably wouldn't have heard of, Russ Columbo.
He may have been the one who actually started that form of singing.
It's a baritone voice, but it's a very melodic kind of singing, and it emphasizes also the poetry of the song, like, I Left My Heart in San Francisco, with a description of what a beautiful city it is, or New York, New York, Frank Sinatra, right?
Those are the kinds of songs that they would emphasize.
And Sinatra was the leader, and he emphasized, to a very large extent, pronouncing the words very clearly while you were singing.
Because to him, both the music and the background production And the words were extraordinarily important, which is true of all singers, believe it or not, even in opera.
That was what Pavarotti would tell you.
I mean, you'd say, well, what distinguishes you, Luciano?
What really distinguished him was his voice could go so high and retain power.
But he would say, I pronounce the words.
I pronounce every word.
In Italian, of course.
Although his English, I mean, Luciano's English was very good.
One of the great benefits of being the mayor was you'd get to meet all these people.
So I spent some time with Luciano before he died.
Unfortunately, much too early.
And he had great regard for Tony Bennett.
In fact, Often when you would talk to singers about the great singers of the 40s and 50s who really dominated, many of them would say that Tony Bennett had the best voice and Sinatra was the best producer, the guy who could take a song and make it sort of special, even though
in the latter part of his career, second half of his career, his voice wasn't nearly as beautiful as it was in the early
part.
And on that occasion, his wanting to go into acting.
Sometime we'll tell you the real story of that.
Which the Godfather has sort of a fictionalized version.
Well, yesterday was a much more important day than the American press would allow you to really focus on.
Because they are still very heavily into their covering up for these two.
Would you show that picture, please?
In history books, when we start writing history again and teaching it, those two will go down as the biggest scoundrels to ever occupy the White House.
I hope.
Because I hope there's no one ever bigger than this.
I hope never again do we put a crook in the White House.
But we really put a crook in the White House.
A massive lifetime of crime.
Lifetime of selling public office.
I don't know.
I would say the kind of crimes committed by Howerman and the terrorists get me even angrier.
But if we talk about nonviolent crime, there's nothing that gets me more upset than public corruption.
I began my career as an assistant U.S.
attorney.
My first executive position was head of the Public Corruption Unit in the U.S.
Attorney's Office.
And probably I prosecuted more of those cases than any others.
They used to always say equal number of Republicans and Democrats because neither party has a monopoly on virtue or vice.
Right now, the Democrats are doing a pretty good job of having a monopoly on virtue and encouragement of crime.
You just take a look at the cities with the overwhelming amount of crime.
I don't know, there may be a Republican city there, but it's almost overwhelmingly Democrat.
And you can't imagine that there could possibly be a president.
That has taken more bribes than this one.
It's almost ridiculous to listen to the people who still avoid the conclusion.
Yesterday's revelation by the FBI of the of the FBI report, the FB 1023 again, I want you to you can't really read it.
It's too small.
I want you to look at it This is what an FBI and I in my career I've read thousands of these I actually had to start wearing glasses because of these FBI reports because they were a little this this this one The normal report is just a report of an interview the thousands of those when you get one of these you wake up at 1023 and Do you know what it means when the FBI says that this guy is like a 100% informant and 100% source?
Mayor?
It means he's golden.
What that means is, unless the agents are lying, and I would hope they wouldn't be, he's never misled them, ever.
Not even one time.
Ted, you wanted to ask me something?
Mayor, what exactly is a FBI FD 1023 form?
We're hearing a lot about this.
It's really a summary of a number of interviews, rather than just a singular interview, of great significance.
It just ends up putting it in a category where you'll pay more attention to it.
And it also indicates That the agent or agents in this case have great confidence in the credibility of the source.
This guy has been paid well over $100,000 at various times for his work.
There's not a time where his work resulted in them being misled.
It's led to convictions of people.
So I would say I would say that you can be certain that what he recites here that was told to him by Zlochevsky is correct.
Now we've got to go back to Zlochevsky.
Is Zlochevsky telling the truth?
But I don't think we have a barrier here about the agent himself.
They call him a CHS in this particular description.
That's the description they use a lot.
Now remember, there's something else that has been overlooked.
about this.
Not only does the informant, or the, I shouldn't call them informant, that has like a bad feeling to it.
Confidential human source.
Confidential human source, but I never, we never called them that.
That's a new, confidential human source is a new description.
Source?
We used to call them informant, but that's terrible.
I don't think people like being called informants, but Important.
Because usually it means they're criminals who turn.
I have no idea if this guy had that kind of background or he was just a, I mean, a lot of them are just doing it because of their desire to help.
And a lot of them are doing it for money and a lot of them are doing it to work off problems.
But before you get into this category, you get tested.
But there's a second witness to this.
No one paid much attention to it, and no one paid attention to who the witness is now working for.
Did they?
Because they don't want to.
This is very significant.
On every occasion that I can see in this FD 1023, when the agent gets the information from the confidential human source, There's somebody else at the meeting called, I guess his official name is Oksander Ostapenko, or otherwise called Alexander.
So he's there and he is the one who introduces the confidential source to Mykola Zlochevsky.
So if you Just in case you meet him on the street, let's take a good look at my collar and you'll get an idea of what a Ukrainian organized criminal, oligarch, and massive thief looks like.
Suspected also in the disappearance or the death of his partner.
Just was like too coincidental that when He got out of government having stolen, in essence, all the properties and building his company.
Basically, what he did is so thoroughly dishonest, it's hard to even describe.
While he was a minister in the government of Ukraine, the pro-Russian government, he gave himself all the best properties, his company, and he had a partner.
His partner ran the company.
Shortly after he left government, Having built his company up to like 30 or 40 billion, his partner died.
And then he basically stole the company from the widow.
And he is now, if he isn't 100% owner, he's real close to it.
So all of a sudden, he comes out after his poor old partner has been running the thing for five years.
From Cyprus.
And the guy goes off one night after having dinner with him and his pals, drunk as a skunk, and drives into a tree.
It is alleged that that was the third or fourth time they sent them off that way.
What do you think?
I don't know.
A little murder between friends like that.
I think in a place like With the kind of corruption you have in that government, which matches Russia's, we'll never find out.
But he's suspected of it by decent people.
Ostapenko, who's the other witness, works for Zelensky.
Yes, yes, yes.
The prince, Zelensky.
You know who Zelensky worked for, right?
Of course you don't.
Zelensky worked for the biggest money launderer in Ukraine, named Kolomoisky.
Kolomoisky owned Privet Bank.
He basically owned also the television network that made Zelensky a star.
He was, and they were very close, described often as Zelensky's mentor.
Be close as to who's a bigger thief, him or Zelensky.
He was an expert money launderer, and the money laundering here, which is substantial, involving the Bidens, was handled by Kolomoisky, who was Zelensky's mentor.
The witness here, Ostapenko, now works for Zelensky.
So here's what this means.
This means that whether the Whether the American press or the American media or the American establishment or the lying crooked Democrats want to accept it, Zelensky knows everything.
Zelensky has all this and he's got more.
But what do you think Biden has to say when Zelensky says we want more money?
What do you think?
Why do you think Biden has refused to put an auditor in charge of any of the money that goes to Ukraine?
I'm raising it as questions.
And then I'm adding to it that Zelensky knows the exact amount that Biden got from Ukraine.
I can tell you approximately, but I don't know what's in the offshore bank accounts.
There is a witness who could tell us, but the FBI never interviewed her, even though I gave them, and Bob Costello did, her name.
I'll also tell you, although they're not going to like this, that this stems from the information that Bob and I gave to the U.S.
Attorney in Pittsburgh.
And that's what activated them to do this.
When I went to Pittsburgh in January of 2020 and turned over to them, An already easy-to-prove racketeering case on the Biden crime family, with about eight witnesses, and a completed and proven $3 million for them, $14 million for the company, money laundering transaction on paper, documented by the government of Latvia.
Gave them also recordings.
So, Zolchevsky, Basically, so we'll just keep it in mind, told the confidential human source, here are the highlights, right?
That they hired Hunter Biden to protect us through his dad from all kinds of problems.
To get a little more specific, what he really was doing when he met with them, this just
happened in 2014, what he really is talking about is the government of Ukraine started
a massive action in many parts of the world, including in London, to take over Zlochevsky's
business, take it away from him.
Poroshenko hated him.
He hated Poroshenko.
They were on the other side.
He was the president and Biden's big pal.
And Biden had him by the short hairs because Biden was appointed as the point man for Ukraine and Biden could dole out the money or not.
Zolchevsky knew this.
He made contact with Biden and he made a deal.
And the deal was, well, let's go on and explain it.
Zelensky explained to the confidential source and Zelensky's friend Ostapenko that, don't worry, Hunter will take care of all those issues through his dad.
Here he's talking about the possible acquisition of an American energy company.
Then he goes on at the next meeting and says, it costs $5 million to pay one Biden and $5 million to another Biden.
And then the confidential human source basically tells him he thinks this was a very bad idea, that he shouldn't have, he shouldn't go any further with, you know, but basically Zoschesky tells him it's too late.
This conversation takes place also in early 2016.
So Sheskey said, Hunter Biden was stupid and his dog was smarter.
But Zolchevsky needed to keep Hunter Biden on the board so everything will be okay.
Meaning so he can get his company out of the case that was being brought against them in order to seize the $40 billion company.
Now, what you should know is that although the Bidens and the Democrats have lied about this, that Shulkin, the prosecutor, was corrupt and that's why they got rid of him.
I mean, there's no other prosecutor in the world that Biden never got rid of for being corrupt.
What the hell would he get rid of this guy because he was corrupt?
And then there's an actual recording of a conversation between Poroshenko and Biden in which Poroshenko straight up tells Biden that, I guess to get credit for doing it, that Shokin was not corrupt, but he got rid of him because Biden told him to do it.
That's actually recorded.
But you know, they don't play that for you.
Because today, the Democrats all went around saying, the ones that could pronounce it, there's no corroboration.
Some of them say cooperation.
I think they're saying cooperation.
The R's give them a little trouble, I guess, because a lot of these Democrats really are not very well educated.
Cooperation is cooperation.
Well, the corroboration is multitudinous.
I've never seen such corroboration, any case I ever had.
Today Steve Bannon on his show asked me what kind of evidence did I have in the cases that I prosecuted against a mob and against Wall Street and I said about a third of this.
This is an overwhelming case.
Most of the stuff they don't even, it's completely suppressed.
You know, if it wasn't for me, we wouldn't even be discussing this.
That's why they hate me so much and want to destroy me, want to put me in jail.
They want to put me in jail for revealing the biggest scandal in American history.
Isn't that amazing?
They just want to shut me up.
Do you know when Biden began running for president, he wrote a letter to all of the networks to keep me off?
Then when they when they talked about this in 2020, when a lot of this had become public,
what Zolensky told the confidential human source and Ostopenko, Zolensky's employee,
that he didn't want to pay the Bidens and he was pushed to pay them.
He said he has many text messages and recordings that show that he was coerced to make such payments.
And then the confidential human source asked him, you know, who pressured him?
He said they both did.
And then he goes on in this conversation to say that he had a total of 17 recordings, two involving Joe Biden, 15 only Hunter, And according to Zlochevsky, these recordings are evidence that he was coerced into paying the Bidens to ensure that Ukraine prosecutor general Viktor Shokin was fired.
And the reason to fire him was because he would not, um, he would not comply with Poroshenko's order to drop the case.
Now you should know that.
In corroborating this, one of the things that corroborates, because all this little evidence is what you use in a trial, is that here, the whole thing blew up on February 1st, 2016.
On that date, it doesn't matter a record, Shokin's office served an arrest warrant on this gigantic company.
In Ukraine, an arrest warrant of a company closes it down.
They have to stop doing business, and the government takes the company over.
So, Zlochevsky's worst nightmare had taken place.
His company had been taken from him, and he had hired Biden to save him.
Now, very interesting.
You look at the month of February, and within that two-week period after that, Poroshenko and Biden are on the phone four times.
It's a very, very lengthy conversation.
In all the months, many, many months that he was vice president, there's never a month in which he ever had that many conversations with Poroshenko.
There's certainly never a week in which he had four conversations with him.
And that's the week, just coincidentally, that Poroshenko was arrested.
Because here's what happened.
The deal was, they paid the five and the five, and then in addition to that, A salary of a million dollars a year to Hunter and a million dollars a year to Devin Archer.
That's another two million coming into the company.
Okay?
Plus the laundered money going in.
So now Joe had to act.
Because Shoken, contrary to what their lies, was going after the company.
And there's proof of that.
And Joe got the job done.
Now, you want to know what the corroboration is?
You don't need any corroboration.
You could do this case without this.
You could start this case off with Joe telling you what he did.
The following conversation, if I were teaching criminal law, I would use, and remember, did you ever have to diagram sentences?
You know, parse them?
So you could deal with articles and pronouns.
I've done this with my podcast, several podcasts.
I could take this and I could chart for you why this is a bribery case.
Let me just tell you the brief definition of bribery.
It's offering something of value in exchange for official action.
So now I want you to listen to Biden's words.
No one ever accused him of having a brain, even before he was demented.
And he tells all these people who, by the way, are like the members of the Atlantic council, all like distinguished people who laugh at this.
Some of them are lawyers, obviously not well-educated.
First time I heard this conversation, and it was played for me first time in December of 2018.
The first time I heard this, I said, oh my God.
I knew Joe for 35 years and I knew he was a dummy, but I never, ever, Never ever thought he was a crook.
Certainly not to this magnitude.
This was the first indication I had, and it wasn't even indication.
I knew straight out this guy's, this guy is involved in bribery.
That's what he just told me.
Offering something in exchange for official action.
Let's listen to, let's listen to this criminal confess.
I remember going over convincing our team or others to convincing us that we should be providing for loan guarantees.
And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev, and I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee.
And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Uh, Yatsenyuk, that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn't.
So they said they had, they were walking out to the press conference, said, no, I said, I'm not going to, we're not going to give you the billion dollars.
They said, you have no authority.
You're not the president.
The president said, I said, call him.
I said, I'm telling you, you're not getting the billion dollars.
I said, you're not getting the billion.
I'm going to be leaving here, and I think it was, what, six hours?
I look, I said, I'm leaving in six hours.
If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money.
Oh, son of a bitch.
You know, just to complete that, they put in place somebody he approved about two weeks later, and there's a recorded conversation of that also.
Why would Poroshenko get approval from him as to the prosecutor?
Because the guy they put in was the hitman.
He was the one that was going to drop the case, and he did.
The proof is in the pudding.
This massive case against Burisma that was promising the Ukrainian people 20, 30 million ended up getting completely tanked, just like Hillary's case did in the United States, just like the cases here in America involving other Democrats get tanked.
They do it on both sides of the Atlantic.
This one, he got a big piece of change for it, though.
But you know what Zelensky goes around saying?
And this, I guess, I got from another source.
He goes around saying, I got away cheap.
For this whole thing, he put out something like 200, maybe 150 million.
He didn't just bribe Biden, he also bribed Poroshenko, people in Ukraine.
He said, I got away cheap.
Well, think about it.
Let's say he even put out 200 million in bribes.
He got to keep his $40 billion company that he awarded himself while he was in government.
He still has it.
And the government of Ukraine doesn't want him to have it.
They were going after to take it away from him because this guy, look what phonies they are.
This guy was a Russian-leaning Ukrainian.
Supported Putin.
I mean, now I don't know where he is, but back then he supported Putin.
So the question is, I mean, all day today they're saying, well, they have to prove that these things are true.
After all, Zelensky could be lying, and the informant could be lying, and they don't.
They already have the proof.
They have Shokin as a witness.
You can't get any better witness than the guy who actually got fired and the reason he was fired, who overheard some of the conversations with Biden.
And the other parts of it were described to him by Poroshenko.
They've got the actual prosecutor who was there with Senko when the hit went down, when the case was fixed, as well as other cases that were fixed.
Some of them involving other interesting people.
They have two other outside witnesses to that in Ukraine that the State Department did everything they could to block coming to the United States.
They have a document They have a document that I have which documents right on paper a money laundering transaction that was discovered by the Latvian government.
They alerted the Ukrainian government because the money went through Latvia, went from Ukraine to Latvia to Cyprus to the Biden account.
Clearly laundered on paper.
They've had it for three years.
Haven't done a damn thing about it.
You could just prosecute that.
Oh, Joe got a piece of that and there's a note that says it.
There's a note that says it.
And they never went to subpoena his accounts.
And then if you want the piece de resistance, here's the piece de resistance.
Never forget this.
Okay?
In December of 2018, right at the height of all this, Hunter emails his daughter and says, nobody said Hunter was careful, right?
This is the guy who left not just the computer hard drive that I got, this guy left at least two others behind, including one that went to a Russian prostitute slash spy.
Hunter writes, When you take over, maybe they'll have more, maybe it'll be different because something like you look at it differently or whatever, but they have no respect for me.
Even though I've paid all the expenses of this family for 30 years.
And, but maybe pop won't require you to give half your income to him.
Like I've done for the last 30 years.
What do you need after that?
Huh?
How do they get away with this?
How?
We'll talk about that at the end, how they get away with it or the significance of it, because this worries me so much for my country, because it isn't just what big crooks they are, it's how corrupt our governments become.
I mean, this is one Cover up after another, after another.
One more phony prosecution after another.
Look, I've personally been the object of this three years of being investigated.
Then I finally get a letter to the grand jury, there's no evidence of a crime.
Now I read, they want to try to prosecute me again.
I don't know for what, because I didn't commit any crimes.
Let's face it, for being Trump's lawyer and for being And for being the reason they are facing this.
This will probably just irritate them more, but we would not be talking about this if it wasn't for me.
You wouldn't know about it.
Let's play that voicemail.
You wouldn't know about the original evidence that I dug up and handed over to them, to the state department that was ignored and to Barr.
That alone, I've already, on all my podcasts, that alone was an overwhelming RICO case.
And then, you wouldn't have known about the hard drive because I was John Mac Isaac's last hope.
Bob Costello and me, we put it out.
And you can see what they did to us for it.
Ted, you were going to ask?
You were talking about the voicemail.
We have it queued up if you want to play it.
Joe to Hunter.
It shows that Joe in fact had spoken and was aware of Hunter's foreign business.
This is enormously important because there's a concept in the law of evidence called false exculpatory statement.
Because in order to convict someone of a crime, I laid out for you the bare elements of bribery.
Something of value, In exchange for official action.
But you have to do it knowingly and willfully, intentionally.
You don't prove intent usually by the person announcing, I intend to commit a crime.
You don't prove it with an x-ray of the brain.
You prove it from the things that a person says and does.
Most important ones being, if they lie, in a way to protect themselves.
It's called a false exculpatory statement.
And if you have one, during the course of the trial, at the end of it, the judge will charge the jury that that alone can be the basis on which you can find the intent to commit a crime.
Now, you got a whopper of a false exculpatory statement here.
I mean a gigantic one.
For years.
What has Joe said?
You all know this.
I never talk to my son about his foreign business.
I don't know anything about his foreign business.
And I do that on purpose so there won't be a conflict.
Now, that's pretty faulty because his son could have a hundred conflicts and he doesn't know about it.
How's his son going to find out if there's a conflict if he doesn't talk to him?
That has always been an absurd statement, but the press and the Times writes it as if it's serious.
And there's no one that ever believed that he didn't talk to his son about the 1.5 billion from China, or he takes them to China, comes back with 1.5 billion.
He doesn't talk to his father about it?
Because nobody believes this, but you got to prove it, right?
Well, There's an enormous amount of proof.
That's why the hard drive was so important.
The hard drive has picture after picture, meeting after meeting with the foreign clients, discussions of it.
But the best thing of all, in his own words, Joe leaves a message for Hunter, saying, I read the article in the Times.
You got nothing to worry about.
This is an article laying out how Two red Chinese communists at the very high level of the Communist Party in China were seeking to get influence in the United States and how they had met with Hunter Biden and Hunter Biden wanted to do business with him.
That's what the article was about.
In other words, it was a detailed article about Hunter Biden's dealings with foreign They became clients and partners and Joe became a partner in that.
This is ultimately the transaction where it says 10% for the big guy.
It's all written in the New York Times.
So when Joe says here, I read the Times article, he's now admitting that he read the article about his son's foreign clients.
The very thing he's been lying about for five years.
Let's play this, let's play this recording that was left stupidly on, but I guess he never thought that his son Hunter would give it to me, but he did.
indirectly.
It's 8.15 on Wednesday night.
It's a good chance to be called.
Nothing urgent.
Okay.
So, I don't know.
I thought the article at least online, it's gonna be printed one time, it's good.
I need to clear.
And anyway, if you get a chance to call, I love you.
Okay.
So I don't know, I could go on and on and on and just, I mean, it's really interesting for me
cause I love trying cases and I would give my eye teeth to try this case.
I mean, I had to go back to the courtroom one more time.
You know, I never lost a case as a prosecutor, so the odds would be pretty good.
And I honestly mean this, absolutely, honest truth.
I never had a case with this much evidence.
Never.
Never, never, never.
Last case that I prosecuted as a prosecutor, every newspaper in New York was convinced I was going to lose.
One of the reasons I became famous is because I won that case.
It was a major bribery case involving the closest political officials in New York City to the mayor, Ed Koch.
Probably one of the reasons I became mayor is I convicted them all in a trial where the venue was changed because we were fair.
We moved it out of New York and we moved it to New Haven and I tried it myself.
Very rare for U.S.
attorneys in New York to do that.
It's possible I was the last U.S.
attorney to try a case, and the press was convinced I was going to lose it.
They didn't understand the case because I tried it in a certain kind of way that sometime I'll explain to you, but it was kind of a They had no idea how I was going to use the circumstantial evidence, because they don't have the discipline to understand how little pieces of evidence can convict you.
Because when you put enough of it together, you put the puzzle together, in a summation, it's deadly.
Because circumstantial evidence, in a way, is more powerful than direct evidence.
Direct evidence, person has to be telling the truth, right?
Circumstantial evidence is just there and you got to draw an implication from it.
So that's how I did it.
And this one has both.
This has massive amount of circumstantial evidence.
I mean, it's so obvious that he was taking bribes.
It's ridiculous what these people say.
If you can't figure out that Joe Biden was taking bribes, I really don't think you have a good chance of getting across the street.
Or you're a big liar.
So let's see.
Well, I think we covered most of it.
Oh, there is one other thing I want to talk about because it just annoys me.
I am tired of the same liars going after Trump and me.
It's the same liars and the same lies.
And how many times can they do it and they get away with it?
How many times can they do Russian collusion?
And the whole thing is not a hoax.
It's a massive Fraud.
Proven 50 different ways as a fraud.
Hillary Clinton paid for it.
It's the same cast of characters that want to prosecute him now.
Why would they be lying then and telling the truth now?
Why would he be telling the truth then but not now?
Or maybe, shouldn't they be stopped at some point?
I mean, how often do you get to falsely accuse somebody?
To be labeled then as, well, you're the criminal, not the person you're accusing.
Well, you had the, so you had that.
Now listen, listen, listen to what some of the biggest liars had to say.
Jamie Raskin, what a joke.
What a total joke.
Massive liar.
Big, big Russian collusion guy.
Knew for sure that Hillary paid for it.
Knew for sure that he was lying his backside off.
He says there's no evidence that Hunter Biden has received any kind of official favoritism in this prosecution for being Joe Biden's son.
Now do I really have to prove that Hunter received favoritism?
To prove that this man is a massive liar?
Only elected because he's in California where they will accept a massive Democratic crook and liar?
He didn't have favoritism in this case?
How about the fact he's never been prosecuted?
I mean, these crimes go back a year, two years, three years, four years.
The money laundering transaction goes back to 2016.
It's on paper.
His name is on it.
The money he got is listed.
The bank records are there.
It's a straight out and out money laundering conviction.
They could have gotten five years ago.
There are 170 suspicious action reports in the State Department, none of which have ever been looked at, involving Hunter and his business.
That's not favoritism.
I'm not even talking about what the two IRS agents testified to.
They're lying?
These guys aren't political.
They weren't put there by Shifty Schiff like he did to Trump.
Then he never even showed the whistleblower.
These whistleblowers appeared.
These whistleblowers appeared.
And they testified.
Not like Schiff's whistleblowers.
So there's plenty of evidence.
Then we have Jen Psaki, and this one really gets me because I was accused of this.
She says that Comer was working with and co-opted by a foreign government.
He was a foreign agent.
Haven't they used that already?
Listen to Biden's attack on me at the debate in 2020, the second debate.
That was set up because he got 51 former intelligence high-level officials to lie for him.
This had the earmarks of Russian collusion.
And by the way, the FBI had validated the hard drive seven months before.
Seven months before.
And even before Biden said this, An FBI agent told an official at Twitter that the hard drive was Hunter Biden's and legitimate.
An FBI agent testified to that the other day.
I'll give you the name of the FBI agent, not a confidential source.
So they damn well knew it was legitimate and they lied about it.
In order to set up this moment of fraud, At the debate with Trump.
Shall we play it, Ted?
We're going to have to...
Why don't we take a commercial break?
And we'll be...
Faith and family.
Freedom and finance.
I trust the team at Kirk Elliott PhD Private Advisors with providing the advice and sound strategies to take advantage of the inflationary pressures, the high interest rates, and the international challenges we face today.
The Kirk Elliott team, with over 29 years of experience, shares our values and believes in people over profit.
They can help you protect your finances from the big government policies that are out of our control.
So what's in our control?
The decision to act or not to act is within our control.
I encourage you to act.
Call Kirk Elliott, Ph.D.
Private Advisors today.
Start working with a team that will help you protect your retirement assets with gold and silver, while sharing your desire to protect your faith, family, and freedom.
Call them today, 720-605-3900.
That's 720-605-3900.
720-605-3900.
That's 720-605-3900.
And tell them Rudy sent you.
Or simply fill out a request for a free consultation at kirkelliottphd.com slash Rudy.
That's a hell of a thing, isn't it?
Well, we're back again, and we are going to play for you the biggest liar who's ever occupied the presidency, certainly the biggest crook.
We're going to watch him now as he fraudulently made his way to becoming president of the United States and forget cheating on the vote by suppressing the most significant evidence of criminality ever presented in a presidential election and getting all of these prostitutes and I'm talking now about political prostitutes that are worse than the other kind by by far.
Go ahead.
Hey pal, it's dad.
It's 8.15 on Wednesday night.
If you get a chance, give me a call.
Nothing, nothing urgent.
I just want to talk to you.
I thought the article at least has been on online.
It's going to be printed tomorrow morning.
Time is good.
I need you clear.
And anyway, if you get a chance, give me a call.
I love you.
Well, 16 months later, the New York Times and the Washington Post validated the hard drive, which had been validated 10 months before Biden told that lie by the FBI.
Not only that, on the day that the New York Post, on the day that the New York Post published the articles, That then were suppressed by Twitter and everybody else.
On that very, very day, the FBI told, a senior FBI official told Twitter that Hunter Biden's laptop was legitimate.
So when Twitter suppressed the hard drive and everybody else followed them, According to Laura Demlow, D-E-H-M-L-O-W, Section Chief of the FBI's Foreign Influence Task Force, she recollected in a closed-door deposition Monday, according to a release from the Republican-led committee, that on October 14, 2020, hours after the Post published a story detailing how an email showed Joe Biden met
While Vice President was an executive of Burisma, completely blowing up his claim that he wasn't involved and didn't know about the foreign business.
She, the FBI, had validated and disclosed that to Twitter.
That's the day they disclosed it.
The day they validated it was in December of 2019.
So when he said that, And then he goes on to say the same thing about Trump, basically.
When he said that, our Federal Bureau of Investigation knew it was a complete lie, that he was accusing me of being a Russian agent, and it was completely false.
They had determined that.
Almost a year earlier, and they suppressed that.
They suppressed the entire hard drive.
They suppressed the hundreds of crimes that are on there and the millions of dollars in bribes so that you voted for him not knowing that you were electing the biggest crook to be elected president in American history.
I don't know.
That seems to me to be even worse than cheating.
Well, Mayor, let's go to the phone lines.
Let's take our first call.
Let's go to Joey in Alabama.
David could do that, why the hell wouldn't they cheat on the electoral count?
These guys are thoroughly dishonest, thoroughly.
The desire for power and money has made them evil.
Biden is certainly evil.
Gosh, the way he treats his grandkids.
Well Mayor, let's go to the phone lines.
Let's take our first call.
Let's go to Joey in Alabama.
Joey, you're on with the Mayor.
Hey Mr. Mayor, how are you?
I'm good, Joey.
How are you?
I'm good.
First of all, let me thank you for you always keep it real and thank you for speaking the truth about everything.
Thank you for appreciating it.
It means a lot.
Yes, sir.
My question is this.
With all this corruption coming about and The normal people are starting to finally see how corrupt and filthy this family is.
All right.
And with what they put Trump through, they put him through two impeachments.
And I know if they impeach Biden, it won't pass the Senate, but the pain is the process.
Put him through it, besmirch his name.
Why are the Republicans, he should have been impeached two months ago.
No question about it.
You have to impeach him.
You can't, you cannot, you have to impeach him.
I mean, you can't possibly sit there with the evidence that has now been amassed that a president, while he was vice president, took 40, 50 million dollars in bribes.
We haven't even talked about China.
Huh.
And look, we could be on his third impeachment.
Yeah, I mean, the man has to be out of the White House.
I mean, it's ridiculous that we don't react to this more.
I mean, this is the worst testimony of any kind ever against a president.
And think about it.
It happens to also affect our national security.
Zelensky has this all on him.
I mean, in other words... Why is this not happening, Mr. Mayor?
What is stopping these people from not impeaching it?
Because everybody is so afraid of the press and the media.
And, you know, if you listen to the news, they don't even report it.
It's like this isn't happening.
I mean, two IRS agents basically say the Hunter Biden and Joe Biden cases were fixed.
There's every reason to believe them and no reason not to.
One of them is a Democrat.
The other one is non-political.
They came forward.
Nobody went and got them.
And they're career IRS agents who are horrified at what they see.
This informant was developed by the FBI, not by anybody else.
Of course, once they got the information, they buried it.
Of course we should impeach him, there's no question about it.
Put them on record for the sake of history when every one of those senators that votes to acquit him will vote to acquit the biggest crook in the history of America, who has jeopardized our national security.
I mean, how can he refuse Zelensky, anything Zelensky wants?
Correct.
Zelensky's main supporter, Was the guy who did the money laundering.
Kolomoisky.
His bank.
Privatbank.
That's how Kolomoisky became a multi-billionaire.
By money laundering.
He was a master at it.
One of the best in the world.
That's the guy who made Zelensky's career.
And who Zelensky brought back out of exile when he became president of Ukraine.
Now, he's got that whole file there.
I mean, he knows about how many bribes were given to his predecessor.
That was entwined with this.
Since it's not relevant, I don't spend an awful lot of time on this, but you don't think that the president of Ukraine didn't get bribed here?
He got bribed by Zelensky also.
And Zelensky knows that.
Got all the proof of it.
But he's not going forward against the crooks in Ukraine.
So when Zelensky says, give me another, you know, 20 million or 20 billion, Joe's got to jump.
Or the whole file will get released.
Hmm?
How about China?
Maybe that's the reason Yellen was bowing so much.
Do we do anything to China?
China is killing us with fentanyl.
He opens the border to it, helps them come in.
Virtually our border patrol now assists people in getting across the border.
I'm not exaggerating.
You can see it on television if you want.
Border Patrol exists to stop them from coming in, not help them to come across the border.
Now, because of that, we have record levels of young people being killed from fentanyl and now the new drugs that are developing from it.
I mean, massive numbers of people.
The Chinese are conducting a war against us and not paying any price for it.
They're killing somewhere near 100,000 of us a year.
I don't know if they could do that in a war.
They're not losing anybody because we're not shooting back, and it's not costing them any money.
In fact, they're making billions on it.
And Joe's sitting there, not doing anything about it.
Now, how can he?
That government has given him and his family, his crooked, decrepit family, $30 million.
Okay, anybody else?
You have a question, Ted?
Let's now go to our friend Julie.
Julie's calling us from the great state of Washington.
Julie, you're on with the mayor.
Hello.
Hi, Julie.
Hello, Julie.
Hello, Rudy.
How are you today?
We're very good.
How are you?
Glad to talk to you as usual.
I was going to ask you You know, they took your law license away from you illegally, didn't they?
Sure.
They actually suspended it illegally.
And now they're in the process of trying to take it away from me.
Yes.
It's a shame.
There's no way you can get it back.
Well, yeah.
I have to convince people who despise Trump and despise me and who have engaged in one lie after another.
I have to convince them not to do it.
I mean, they actually suspended my license in New York because I'm a danger to the public.
They're afraid that if I talk about the fact that the election was stolen, that it will result in violence.
Well, of course, that was when January 6th was still exaggerated.
Since then, a judge has dismissed me from the case, saying that I did nothing to provoke violence.
In fact, the one thing they tried to use against me, they completely distorted, which was, I said that there should be a trial by combat.
It's quite clear if you look at the three sentences before and the three after that any honest person would.
I was talking about the machines being compared to each other, not violence.
The judge pointed that out.
The judge pointed out that nobody reacted that way in the crowd and that I had nothing to do with any of the plans for this or And by the way, the judge was an Obama appointment on the D.C.
court, who has been extraordinarily tough, if not unfair, to many of the January 6th people.
But he dismissed me.
And the Bar Association has not listened to any requests for at least giving my license back so that I could practice law or make a living while they're torturing me.
Look, the Bar Association in New York, and particularly in D.C., who is the Bar Association in D.C.?
It's the lawyers who make a fortune practicing with the government.
And what's our government?
Our government's corrupt.
They're not going to screw around and do anything for me.
I mean, they'll get nothing out of the government if they do that.
I mean, I don't know if you know the scandal going on in my profession, which is ignored by the bar associations, and that is that nobody will represent Trump or any of his people.
When I say nobody, very few people.
The case in D.C.
that they analyze and hold me responsible for and rip apart is a case that I argued in Pennsylvania, the only case that I argued.
They say that I misrepresented.
I didn't.
They ignore the support that I have for what I said.
And I took over that case two days before it had to be argued because the lawyer handling the case was threatened and had to leave.
And he was threatened not only with violence, but he was threatened by his law firm with being thrown out.
That's very, very common.
Look at the guy representing Trump had to leave his law firm.
That's so antithetical to what it means to be a lawyer.
They have made the profession into such a, as I said, they're prostitutes.
And I have more respect for prostitutes.
I mean, if you look at the situation in this Gilgo murder case, which I'm spending a lot of time analyzing, if I can go out there again tomorrow, because I'm quite convinced that something very, very shady happened there.
In the investigation of the case, this case should have been solved 11 years ago.
Now, that left a serial killer running around for 10 or 11 years.
Now, we don't know if he did anything in those 10 or 11 years.
We're not going to know for quite some time until he gets fully investigated, but the potential was there.
They did it to cover up the illegal activities that government officials were involved in.
I'm quite certain of that.
I'm not ready to make any charges.
I'm not ready to be specific about it, except There are some people who are, but I'm not ready to do that.
And I want to take a good look at it, but everything tells me that something is not right in the state of Denmark.
In 2012, with just minimal police activity, they could have caught him.
The police chief would not bring the FBI in.
I don't know why the FBI didn't push their way in.
There was a violation of federal law.
The first young woman that came to light, that caused the discovery of all the bodies, Shannon Gilbert.
She traveled to go meet her John in Oak Beach, Long Island, right next to Gilgo Beach.
Across state lines.
She was transported across state lines based on going to service him.
That is a violation of something called the Mann Act, which has been in existence for time immemorial and used, not like the kinds of stuff the Democrats do.
And it is directly under the jurisdiction of the FBI.
Now, normally people say, well, they didn't invite the FBI in because it's, but even in a local case, You invite the FBI in, in a case like this, because you get the benefit in a serial murder situation.
Just because there are murders in one place doesn't mean this guy 10 or 20 years ago didn't murder in Oklahoma or in who knows where.
The FBI would have the capacity to do that.
Not even the NYPD could do it.
And you know, I think the NYPD is the best law enforcement organization in the world.
I would never consider investigating a serial killing without the FBI.
And the fact that the police chief wanted to keep them out, and they allowed him to do that, is a big red flag.
Another big red flag is, they had all the evidence to find this guy in about three days, they just acted on it, in 2012.
They had his car, They had where he lived, this town he lived in.
They had the fact that he was 6'5", 6'6".
And they had the fact that he had a Manhattan office and took the Long Island Railroad.
All they had to do, as I pointed out the other night with the detectives that I had here, he and I could have sat outside the Massapequa Park train station and picked this guy up in two or three days.
The minute this 6'4", 6'5", ogre, the way he was described, walked by, I think we'd pick him out.
And I know I would have picked out his house, right, Ted?
That's right.
What did I tell you when we approached, when we approached?
We're driving into Mesa Pico Park and we don't have the address or anything plugged into the GPS.
So I'm asking the mayor.
Hey, we got to, we got to plug in the address.
He said, don't you worry.
We're going to drive in there.
And within 10 minutes, you're going to see which house has the most activity out front.
And that'll be our house.
Now, we don't even need that.
How would we have found that house if there was no activity?
What would the house have stuck out?
Oh my goodness.
If you said, if you said, Mayor, Ted, you guys are to go to Massapequa Park.
You got to pick out one house that belongs to a potential serial killer.
One house.
You pick the house.
And you know, it's only 17,000 people in Massapequa Park.
8,000 men, 8,000 males.
Massapequa Park. 8000 men less 8000 males. So now get rid of
all the boys. And I don't know how many houses what maybe 4000
houses Yeah.
If you drove through Massapequa with nobody on the street, like early in the morning, but in sunlight, I'm telling you, you would not have to figure very long where the serial killer lived because the house is a wreck.
And the neighbors will tell you that the joke in the neighborhood was, This guy must have bodies in there.
Also, he used to park his is a Chevy Avalanche, a very distinctive Chevy, very distinctive pickup truck.
Yes.
Anyone that has it has like a triangular window between the cab and the bed.
Yes.
They may have the Avalanche.
It's it sticks out.
Right.
It's anyway, everyone not have been another Chevy Avalanche in that park.
But this guy parked it in front of his house.
So now, you know, you got to look for a Chevy Avalanche.
There it is.
They never even bothered to do that.
I mean, I never told them to do that because they didn't want to solve this case because it would open up Oak Beach.
And we'll be we'll have plenty more on that next week.
Don't worry, because we're going out there again.
We're going to we're going to get to the bottom of this.
Well, this is quite the transition.
But before we go, after a long week, I hate corruption.
After a long week of a lot of news, and before a weekend where we will be continuing to cover this story, which will take us who knows where, it's always important to get a good night's sleep.
Right, Mayor?
Yes, it is.
And let's say I'm having some trouble sleeping and I'm looking for some new pillows.
Ah, that was a great way to help our friend who we had a nice long talk about today with Steve Bannon.
We did, but I need a good night's sleep before we go out tomorrow.
We're going off on this.
We got a lot of investigative work to do.
What do I need to do and how do I go?
Where do I go?
Go to MyPillows.com slash Rudy.
I got to use that promo code though, right?
MyPillows.com slash Rudy.
You'll get a great deal.
You'll help us.
You'll help him.
He's going to have a great program in August about, um, things that have to be done to secure the election that we're going to give a lot of attention to.
Mike is.
And, uh, you know, he, he, he makes a lot of money, but he spends a lot of money on things that we, that we treasure.
Uh, like, uh, how the heck are we going to make sure he's going to spend a fortune on making sure that we have a fair election this time?
Uh, just in case it was stolen last time, we're not going to let them do it again, huh?
I mean, they're trying to cover up like they did last time, but we're not gonna let them do that either.
This is coming out.
It's taken much longer than it should because of the corrupt media.
Imagine not even covering the testimony of the IRS agents or the FBI document that says, an FBI official document says that it's alleged that the President of the United States and his son got a $10 million bribe.
How is that not on the front page of the newspapers?
I didn't make it up.
I mean, they used to say I made it up.
Whether I was out of my mind or that I was working for the Russians.
That's what I was doing.
And they got away with it.
You heard him during that debate.
The guy got elected on false pretenses.
And we don't have the guts to impeach him.
Because we don't want Harris?
I mean, I don't know.
We can put up with an idiot.
We just can't.
Very hard to put up with a crook.
And just think of the national security implications.
This guy is owned by China and by Zelensky.
Well, Mayor, going into the weekend, send us off on... Look, it's been a long week.
A lot of news.
Well, the fight's just beginning, it almost seems like, despite everything we've been doing.
Here's the thing to think about for the weekend, and that is, it's like a cancer.
Thank you.
If we can finally get this out, the American people can evaluate it and see it for what it is.
The Democrat Party is going to have to make a massive change in their leadership.
Because they're either corrupt or they've been covering up corruption now for five years.
They all know Biden's a crook.
They all know it.
If we had a fair system, the cases against Trump would now be dismissed.
How can this Justice Department that has been proven to be corrupt, covering up for Biden, In order to stop him from being president, allowing basically a coup, which is the false Russian collusion to try to take a lawfully elected president out of the White House.
How can they be allowed to continue this with these ridiculous prosecutions?
The judge should dismiss the case on due process grounds.
The Justice Department is too crooked to trust in the bringing of these cases.
I think the American people will deliver the verdict though, because we can't trust even the courts to do it.
So you keep the faith.
You keep saying to yourself, if we stay true to the truth and have the courage to go through whatever they put us through, we're going to come out okay, because God's watching over us.
That's the way I get through it.
So you have a great weekend.
Go to RudyGiulianiCS.com for our podcast.
On Sunday, WABCRadio.com, Uncovering the Truth with Dr. Maria.
And then back on Monday, three o'clock on WABCRadio.com and eight o'clock right here.
God bless you and God bless America.
Our purpose is to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
There was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought to us the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers, in which Thomas Paine explained, by rational principles, the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the Kingdom of Great Britain and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, for freedom, freedom of religion, freedom
of speech, the ability to select the people who govern them.
And he explained it in ways that were understandable to all the people, not just the elite.
Because the desire for freedom is universal.
The desire for freedom adheres in the human mind and it is part of the human soul.
This is exactly the time we should consult our history.
Look at what we've done in the past and see if we can't use it to help us now.
We understand that our founders created the greatest country in the history of the world.
The greatest democracy, the freest country.
A country that has taken more people out of poverty than any country ever.
All of us are so fortunate to be Americans.
But a great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we're able to reason.
We're able to talk.
We're able to analyze.
We are able to apply our God-given common sense.
▲
Export Selection