America's Mayor Live (E183): Celebrating the Promise of the American Dream
|
Time
Text
Okay.
Okay.
Well, it is a great pleasure to welcome you to America's Mayor Live, and that introductory
song was an American Revolutionary War song, national hymn, let's call it, which we'll
play also.
also.
This is Independence Week and Independence Month because we think it's entitled to a one-month celebration.
And also, uh, to be reminded of what it all means to have freedom and justice, but you need both.
Can't have one without the other because it turns into tyranny.
Think about it.
Too much freedom without law means people can do whatever they want, including violate other people directly or indirectly.
And it becomes chaos.
And then eventually it becomes tyranny.
And if we have no justice, if we have no law of any kind, then we have no way of resolving our disputes.
And if we have no freedom, obviously we have tyranny.
So you need both.
The two balance each other.
And the more they balance, the more they're in equilibrium, the greater the country, which is why ours has always been the greatest country on earth.
Is it still?
Hmm.
Well, we do have an unbelievable amount of violence going on.
It isn't necessarily the numbers, although in some places, not New York, in some places, the numbers are at record highs.
Philadelphia hit a record a few years ago for homicides, thanks to District Attorney Krasner, who is a bought and paid for Soros I can't call him a prosecutor.
Instrument of criminals in Philadelphia.
He's the one who sets the criminals loose so that they can set records for murder and similar kinds of crime.
He had a Krasner weekend this weekend, which, of course, they blame on gun control.
73 people... I'm sorry, that's not...
That's Chicago.
Philadelphia had a shooting in which five people were shot, two children.
And this was a gun control crime.
It was done by a Black Lives Matter activist.
Give me a break, gun control.
You stupid jerk.
You stupid traitor.
You go tell people this is gun control and a guy named Lives matter for four or five years was instrumental in the
riots Will you let everybody go free?
Also dresses up with bras on in the, uh, in, uh, online.
And this guy goes and shoots five people and it's gun control.
This guy's going to go follow gun control.
As I said, it's meant to take money from people so that the rich ones can live in great big houses, just like communists do.
This guy was the head of an organization run by three avowed Marxists who hate America.
He doesn't follow any laws, except the laws of Black Lives Matter and the Communist Party.
Anybody yelling out to kill cops is obviously not a good candidate for control.
Gun control.
Why do you do that?
Why?
I was neutral on it as a prosecutor.
Then when I became mayor, I had a look at it.
I reduced crime more than any mayor anywhere, anytime, any place.
It had nothing to do with gun control.
Once again, by definition, criminals are not controllable.
And why do you think gun control will control them?
Get it?
There are 300 million guns in the United States.
Gun control wouldn't work even if we didn't have those 300 million.
What's the 300 million gun control?
It's a joke.
It's a sick joke that you try to brainwash people in order to get away with basically causing the crime in America.
Your policies right now, the Democrat Party policies, are causing the crimes.
And then Krasna has the nerve to say things like, well, the murders are greatest in Republican states.
Yeah, like Texas, where in Texas yesterday, they had three dead and eight wounded in just one city in Texas, where we have a Soros GA in the biggest city, in the second biggest city, sending out criminals left and right, right and left.
Destroying Houston, destroying Austin.
No, no, no, no.
It's not Republican states.
It's cities with regressive Democrat mayors, with Soros purchase prosecutors.
We're against the will of the people, and based on your brainwashing and the millions that Soros puts in, you make them victims of your social experiment, which is to turn us into a socialist country in the one world that will be better than the United States you hate.
So, therefore, we had a Fourth of July 9th or 4th of July in the cities that you control.
The cities where not only do we have violence, but we have considerable amount of democratic corruption in the political process.
Cities like New York.
Massive amount of violence in New York this weekend.
Chicago.
You want to know the numbers in Chicago?
Democrat city for over 55 years.
Just voted for even more left-wing Democrat mayors so things could get worse.
Well, they might be getting worse.
They had 73 people shot.
I don't know.
That's like War Zone, isn't it?
73 people shot in that small, confined geographic area of just the city of Chicago.
Not a big city anymore.
Used to be the second biggest.
It's down to third now.
We have 11 dead.
73 shot in Chicago.
We had a lot more shootings in Philadelphia.
I'll have to get the number later, but the five and the two children shot was the main one.
You will not hear on Pravda, in Pravda, you will not hear about that shooting.
And you certainly will not find out that Kimberly Carricka is a very, very active member of Black Lives Matter who likes to go out and kill people.
But it turns out he kills black people too.
So I don't know how much black lives matter.
He's sort of defining what the Black Lives Matter movement really is all about.
It's a Marxist con operation that hurts and takes advantage of black people.
And it's a shame that white people and some black people can be conned with being called racist, and they want to do anything not to be called racist.
In Memphis, we had a group of killings, including a two-year-old boy.
In Texas, we had three dead and eight wounded in just one party.
It was a Brooklyn party.
Of course, there's a Brooklyn, Texas.
I'm sorry, that was in Baltimore.
There was a Brooklyn party.
There were two dead and 20.
Oh, Baltimore had two dead and 28 wounded at a single party.
Must be not much left of that party.
You're trying to tell me that we're not in a, in a, in a violence crisis, a Democrat city.
Let's make it even clearer.
A crooked Democrat city, violence crisis.
I don't know.
I didn't go check all of them out.
I'm sure one was worse than the other, but I guess you can't.
Chicago always wins.
73 shot, 11 dead.
Nobody cares but you and I. Certainly not any of the black politicians or white politicians in Chicago if they're Democrats.
Because they've been in charge for 55 years and it's just gotten worse.
And they just got put in charge again with a useless, off-the-wall, crazy, radical candidate.
Well, Mayor, as someone who was able to win as a Republican in America's largest city, how can Republicans compete again in some of these cities, considering the track record you've just laid out, when these cities have been in Democrat Party control for decades.
Well, the Republican Party has to put resources into establishing a city party, an organization called the Republican Party of Chicago, Republican Party of New York, like we do have in New York.
It did well in the last election.
It did better than in the both gubernatorial election and the mayoral election with Curtis Slear as the candidate.
And then Zeldin in New York, they made gains in both elections.
They've got to keep it up.
And I would recommend that they have a credible, strong spokesman for the party.
You know, like we do nationally, where we have a party chairman, not that we now have credible, strong spokesmen for either party.
That role has kind of disappeared.
They're more like money collectors now.
But we used to have like very articulate, strong leaders of the party who had a great deal of public credibility.
It'd be wise for the parties to have that so that on days like this, there'd be a Republican comment.
The City Council of New York has some really, really great people, but it's got to It's got a sort of, it's got an overall Republican mentality in New York, which is, you know, play with the Democrats.
And this way we'll get something.
Which has been the bane of the Republican party in cities, you know, forever and ever.
So when I got elected, I did not get elected with the city Republican party.
The state Republican party helped me a lot and we had a good strong one then.
And they were very instrumental in getting me, helping to get me elected.
But I had to put together my own party, which included the endorsement of the Liberal Party, a third party.
And the Conservatives ran someone against me and spent $17 million to defeat me because I wasn't somebody they could control.
Senator D'Amato wanted to control me.
He had as good a chance of doing that as Democrats do now.
They spent $17 million.
I spent $2.
I got 72%.
I'm not even sure they got votes.
In other words, we wiped them off the face of the earth.
And largely because we had an extremely credible, honest message.
We didn't need $17 million to fool people.
And that's a long time ago, but that still happens.
But you need a credible, strong party that's going to be useful with comments about crime and how to reduce crime.
Someone actually should give some advice to the White House on how to keep drugs out of the White House.
I thought they should bring in like a, you know how Biden, he doesn't do it as much, but Obama and all the people who can't make decisions, the mayors and the governors and the senators who can't make decisions, they love to do commissions.
That means they won't have to make a decision if they do commissions.
So there should be a commission on how to keep drugs out of the White House.
So that we don't have them.
Do you guys have... You guys want to show... Let me see if I have a little picture up here.
I do.
You guys want to show a little picture of the West Wing.
Let me first point out that when this was originally announced, the communique said that the drugs, the white powder, was found in the ground floor family library.
It has now been changed to the West Wing, which is now described as heavily trafficked, like it's Pennsylvania Station or Grand Central Station.
The West Wing of the White House is not... The West Wing of the White House, I'd like to point out to you, if you see it on the screen right now, do you see where the Oval Office is from the West Wing of the White House?
Do you see that on the screen?
Do you really believe that that's heavily trafficked?
What's the name of the, I keep forgetting her name because I use her initials, the press secretary who lies every day?
Corinne Jean-Pierre.
Corinne Jean-Pierre lies every day.
So today's lie was the West Wing.
First of all, I believe they moved it.
I think this was in the library.
Why would you have the initial communiqué be the library?
I don't forget things.
I'm a Republican.
I have a mind like an elephant.
That's why I was a good investigator.
I remember hearing this first thing yesterday.
White powder found in ground floor family library.
I was counting Hunter out because I didn't think he read books.
So I figured he wasn't gonna be in the library unless, you know... I never saw him like with... I have a hundred pictures of him with smoke In rooms, all over the place, in closets, in bathrooms, never with a book.
Maybe the West Wing has nice tables to do cocaine on, Mayor.
I don't know, I've never been there.
You know what they're talking about?
They're talking about the public office.
In other words, and it's not heavily trafficked.
Mayor, the media is already doing damage control for the Bidens.
Politico had their headline today, White House cocaine culprit unlikely to be found.
I mean, you don't get in and out of that place without being screened eight times.
Even if you're staff, you go through security.
You mean that they're not going to know who's in and out of that building?
First of all, how do they know he's unlikely to be found?
How do they know?
But that's the point, right?
They're just pumping that out there to make it clear.
That's the whole point.
We got to get the headlines out there now.
Politico should just be closed.
Can you close down a public?
Just close it down.
No, you can't.
First Amendment doesn't allow you to close.
Couldn't believe it.
Can you close it down for idiocy, stupidity and moronic comments?
I mean, that's an idiotic comment.
This investigation is a day old.
Maybe that's the new, you know something?
That may be the new Soros D.A.
approach to crimes.
They'll announce after one day that you can't find the criminal.
Get this, Mayor.
It's anonymous law enforcement officials that they're quoting.
They're setting the stage, right?
How about corrupt, moronic law enforcement officials?
But do you see?
I just want you to know what a liar Kareem Kareem, look where it was.
It's in the middle there of the White House.
It is true that you can go there and you can say, my name is Rudolph Giuliani.
I have an appointment with the president, or I have an appointment with the chief of staff, or I have an appointment with someone that works in that wing.
And you'll be kept there in the West Wing for a bit, and then you'll be brought into the office that you are going to.
That's what it functions as.
If they have a big, big, giant meeting, you know, you could have a group of people going through it three times a week.
But to say it's heavily trafficked is obviously an attempt to lie your way out of a very sticky situation, and believe me, they are In great fear that somehow the guy who lost three computers had his gun stuffed in a garbage can.
They don't tell you right next to a school.
They leave that out too.
That, you know, he may have made some kind of mistake and dropped one.
I'd also add the following about Hunter, and I'd like to get, see if I can get the animal activists involved.
I think the animal activist should have a demonstration asking that he be removed from the White House, because he could kill the White House dog.
He drops one of those things on the floor and the dog eats it.
Dog's dead.
You know, we have dogs dying in New York from fentanyl.
We do.
Now, I don't know.
Some of these people, you know, care about animals more than humans.
I don't, but I love animals.
But if that'll get you to get the bum out of the White House, might not be a bad idea.
Now, I don't know if it's his cocaine or not, but I only know for sure one person in the White House who uses cocaine.
Mayor, I mean, if Joe Biden did cocaine, I think that would actually help him.
So maybe he should start.
You think they give Joey cocaine?
No, I think he should start.
It might help him.
Well, they give him stuff.
We don't know what it is.
Yeah.
Sleepy medicine.
Don't they give him the stuff they give people with Like a split personality.
Like schizophrenic medicine, you think?
No, not schizophrenic.
The people who... Multiple personality disorder?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Doctor?
Dr. Maria Knowles.
Can we have the doctor pay attention?
We could use help.
What do you give people, you know... Is it Narcan?
What do you have Narcan for?
You give lithium to some psychologically damaged people?
Bipolar.
Bipolar.
You think Joe's getting lithium?
No.
Well, we're trying to figure out where the cocaine came from.
That was- It was Trump's fault, obviously.
Well, come on.
We're talking about a- It was Trump's fault.
You're not going to know.
You're just not going to find out, Mayor.
There's too many- We're talking about a highly trafficked area.
Am I allowed- A lot of people coming in and out of those- Am I allowed to raise this question or will I be canceled?
Mayor, we know it's Trump's fault.
We know that.
There's a chance it was left behind, they're saying.
Come on.
You know Donald Trump snuck in the White House in the middle of the night and he dropped a bag of cocaine.
It's Trump's fault.
Just like everything that happens is Trump's fault, obviously.
Duh.
Yeah.
We solved it.
We solved it.
Yeah.
We solved it right here.
It was a plant.
Yeah, it was.
That's the answer.
It was a Trump plant.
That's right.
Luckily, I won't be the one for this one because I was in New York for the last... and New Hampshire for the last three, four days.
That's right.
But I could have gotten somebody to do it.
I could have got... I think maybe...
They'll be investigating that now that I got somebody to do this.
Well, just, just like obviously January 6th, today we have a peanut gallery.
It was all Trump's fault.
The cocaine at the white house is obviously Trump's fault.
We, I'm glad.
I'm glad we saw, we heard this exclusively on America's mayor.
I bet, I bet.
That's right.
Ooh.
I think Politico is going to have the answer tomorrow.
They're going to change their tune when they heard what I said.
That was a Trump plant.
There's only one person left in the White House who's a Trumpster who's left, and he brought it in and put it there.
So we have a judge that we like now.
We do.
This is a very, very good opinion in Missouri, in Missouri versus versus Biden, the judge writes the following, Judge Dowdy,
he writes the following, the evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian
scenario.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and
uncertainty, the United States government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian
ministry of truth. Dr. Maria will remember when I did my two Orwell podcasts,
I made the same point as Judge Dowdy, but in the middle of when the dictators were doing their
thing.
It's an excellent opinion.
It basically now enjoins the dishonest and crooked people at the White House from working with their equally dishonest and crooked and politically biased people in social media to do things like You know, ban the hard drive, ban Bannon, ban Giuliani, take off Charlie Kirk, you know, the whole thing.
Or, for example, if they were in full operation now.
Anything I might say about the new evidence against Hunter that they don't want out there, or they don't want emphasized, or the point that Hunter has never met his daughter, or the point that Joe Biden is probably one of the most despicable grandfathers in the United States, if he really can be called a grandfather.
I mean, he is a grandfather biologically, but now that we get to change names and stuff like that, I'm trying to think of the right name for a grandfather.
Who will, when asked how many grandchildren he has, and he has seven, will say only six.
I'm trying to think of a name for one.
Why don't you get one for me and call in and tell me, all right?
It sure shouldn't be President of the United States, should it?
But I hope you all had a good fourth.
I really do.
And I must say, I must say that Uh, the fourth did not bring a great deal of wit and wisdom to the wild ever, ever increasing craziness of the, uh, of the left, I guess, as the election gets closer, it gets, they get hotter and hotter and hotter.
And I, I fear that when the pot, when the, when the likely happens, I always say lightly about an election.
This is not any change of anything or any reflection of anything.
Trump has gotten stronger in the last two weeks.
The second indictment, which I actually, you might remember, when the second indictment took place, I said he might have a temporary, not nosedive, but dent, you know.
He was about 52, 53 then.
Thought maybe he'd hit below 50.
Instead of being ahead of DeSantis by 25, 30, 35, he'd be ahead by 20.
DeSantis would have a little jump up.
None of that happened.
He just plowed ahead.
He's ahead by over 30 points now.
And in most polls, he's either within the margin of error.
Well, in every poll, he's at least within the margin of error with Biden.
And I think in more polls than not, he's ahead of him.
So it's sad.
If there's a discernible effect, the effect is a bump.
You tell me.
So I think they're going crazier and crazier.
So now San Francisco is getting very close to reparations.
And they've got a leader there.
Nicole Cunningham.
Nicole has made it very, very clear that this is a hatred movement.
This is a hate group, these people.
She blasted every straight white man and labeled them a danger to society.
That's you, Mike, and that's you.
Actually, Mayor, I'm Italian, like you.
I don't clarify as white.
Oh, yes, you do.
Stop it.
So, you know, don't be ridiculous.
Don't put me in that group.
I hate when people say that.
Hey, pal, I'm looking at you.
You're white.
Go make jokes somewhere else.
And I'm white, and I betcha Nicole Cunningham thinks you're white.
Who's that?
Nicole Cunningham is the one who says that every white man is a danger to society.
Oh, okay.
Particularly if you're straight.
Sorry, you're straight.
Well, I know many straight males in Rikers Island that are different colors, and they're very dangerous to society.
Oh, okay.
So, I will challenge that statement, sir.
Oh, my money is on Cunningham.
She's tougher, I think.
Mike's a pretty tough guy.
Straight white men are abusive.
Did you hear that?
Straight white men are abusive.
Straight white men are serial killers.
These are quotes, ladies and gentlemen, from Nicole This will be the only time you hear from her, hopefully.
Cunningham.
She is the head of the advisory board for reparations in San Francisco.
When I last checked, it's $1.2 million for every black person in San Francisco.
It's the only thing keeping up the population in San Francisco.
To the credit of the black community, large numbers of them are not moving to San Francisco.
Even with the prospect of getting 1.2 million, they don't want to live in San Francisco.
That's amazing.
So they are, meaning the white people, a dangerous society.
She then said, I might add, not all of them.
That could have excluded Mike, I don't know.
Not all of them, but obviously most.
White people should be held accountable For the actions of slave owners.
So, if you, like me, have a family that came to the United States after slavery was over, you have to be responsible because you're white and you still benefited from the harms that their ancestors caused.
I'm trying to figure out how I benefited from the harms caused by the slave owners.
I don't know how, she doesn't point that out, but that's not necessary if you just say propaganda.
They pose more of a harm.
She's even arguing that you shouldn't take their support and help.
Now, should this then be described as a hate group?
Right?
They hate straight white men.
This is a hate group.
There's a lot more... Is that a picture of her on that article?
Well, in case you want to run by, you want to see what she looks like.
No, um... You know her?
No.
Want me to put her on the lineup?
I thought I typed in Nicole Cunningham reporter and it came up with a blonde haired girl.
So I was gonna make a joke that she's like, looks like she's from the Aryan race, but apparently it's not her.
So this is the one here.
Yeah.
So nevermind then.
Nevermind.
All right.
How do we take a break?
Our friend Kirk.
Uh, yeah, that's a good idea.
This would be a good time to take.
I just wanted to make one other point because I'm very happy about something.
Harvard's getting sued for legacy and admissions.
I think it's so great they can hit on both sides.
What a phony organization Harvard is.
They've been miseducating kids now for about 50 years with the idea, I'm going to Harvard.
I'm going to Harvard.
Where did you go?
I went to Harvard.
You know what's going to happen soon?
I went to Harvard.
I'm sorry.
So now they're getting a lawsuit by the people who are complaining that the donor and legacy group is being admitted without qualification, and therefore it is discriminatory against them, whoever this group is, who did not get admitted.
70% of Ivy League schools' donor-related and legacy applicants are white.
Now that's a little stupid because 70% of the population is white.
So that doesn't sound terrible.
That's one of those things they do with Stop Question and Frisk.
Yeah, they say, you know, 70% of the people that are searched are black.
And there are only 28% of the criminals who were reported by blacks.
It's even worse today.
Blacks report other blacks 75% of the time.
So who are they going to go search?
The people who aren't reported to have committed crimes just for the heck of it to make Nicole Cunningham happy?
Or do they want to solve crime?
Well, Mayor, I have a riddle for you.
I don't know if you can solve it.
Why, if the white man is the devil in the press or whatever, why are most women in politics that are of other ethnicities married to white men?
Is that a... I'm just confused.
Well, you have to ask them.
I don't know.
But they're so... They're so oppressive.
You're going to have to ask them.
I have no idea.
That's not a subject I particularly want to touch.
I don't want to get into why people marry people or any of that stuff.
I think we're good to give him a pill today.
All right.
I don't know why that is, but it's obvious that this Nicole Cunningham is a nutjob.
But I love this idea that Harvard is getting hit for, so seven-time donor-related applicants.
Now, this is really interesting.
Donor-related applicants are nearly seven times more likely to be admitted than non-donor-related applicants.
Legacy-related are six times more likely to be admitted.
In other words, money is more important than blood.
The donor people get seven times.
The related people get six times.
Harvard is like, Harvard's like Biden.
They don't care about blood.
He doesn't care about, he obviously has no interest in that beautiful little girl Navy.
In 2019, 28% of the class were legacies.
That's a big percentage.
When you consider that 28% of the class are legacies, and that they discriminated with regard to the rest of the class and picked blacks over everybody else, you can see why the Asians were shut out.
And probably the Asians had, you know, thousands and thousands of students way better qualified than the blacks who were selected or the legacies and the donors that were I don't see how Harvard, and the legality of this, by the way, is a little more difficult because it isn't government, it isn't protected class, discriminating based on relation or financial contributions is not necessarily a protected area of discrimination.
On the other hand, it does relate in an indirect way to racial discrimination.
it limits the number of applicants that are available, it limits the number of seats available
to qualified blacks, whites, African-Americans, or better qualified blacks, whites, and African-Americans.
But even if this is not a good legal case, and I'm not saying it isn't, I'm just
saying I have not analyzed it from that point of view, whereas the other case
was, and has already been one, is a slam-dunk case.
This is morally offensive, isn't it?
This paragon of virtue trying to tell us what to do, Harvard University, 30% of its class come in on nothing but they were related to somebody who gave money.
What a bunch of phonies.
No wonder they do business with China.
Maybe they're worse than phonies.
Huh?
What do you think?
Could they be worse than phonies?
Well, we'll take that up and many, many other points when we come back and you get ready to give us a call.
The number is?
Give us a call.
You can call us at 646.
You can call us at 646-573-5177.
And we'll be ready to take your call and give us a tough time.
We'll be back in a minute.
Faith and family, freedom and finance are four things that we would do anything to protect.
I trust the team at Kirk Elliott PhD Private Advisors with providing the advice and sound strategies to take advantage of the inflationary pressures The high interest rates and the international challenges we face today.
The Kirk Elliott team, with over 29 years of experience, shares our values and believes in people over profit.
They can help you protect your finances from the big government policies that are out of our control.
So what's in our control?
The decision to act or not to act is within our control.
I encourage you to act.
Call Kirk Elliott, Ph.D.
Private Advisors today.
Start working with a team that will help you protect your retirement assets with gold and silver while sharing your desire to protect your faith, family, and freedom.
Call them today, 720-605-3900.
720-605-3900.
720-605-3900 and tell them Rudy sent you.
Or simply fill out a request for a free consultation at kirkelliottphd.com slash Rudy.
kirkelliottphd.com you
About Pravda, which is the New York Times, which actually was more of a Nazi oriented at one time, even in communist newspaper.
Pravda and the New York Times.
Go through this rag one time and see if you can find in there that comment by Nicole Cunningham that all white men are hateful and terrible.
See if you can find out about the... Do you think it's newsworthy that there was cocaine in the White House, irrespective of whether Hunter Biden put it there?
You think if this happened in Trump's White House, there would be... Okay.
And the... What else has been left out of here?
Almost everything I've talked about, I think, the cocaine in the White House is left out of here, which one would think would be newsworthy, whether there was a big cocaine addict living in the White House or not.
But with a big cocaine addict living in the White House, With a big cocaine addict living in the White House, you would think this would be major newsworthy.
This is A1.
This is, this is top.
I mean, imagine if this happened during the Trump presidency.
Imagine what would happen.
It would be up here.
It would be up here.
They would do a double, they'd do a, A huge expose.
The New York Times will be all over it.
And of course... Okay, how about the judge's opinion that is prohibiting them from communicating with social media?
That's right, Mayor.
And you bring up a good point.
It's important that you point this out because a lot of other news outlets take their cues from the New York Times.
Whether we like it or not, it is still considered a Paper of record.
Is it really?
Not in this household, so to speak, but unfortunately to a lot of folks, including, you know, TV and others, it's a paper of record and they kind of use that to kind of determine their coverage.
Mayor.
Okay, any calls?
Yes, we have Julia from Washington State.
Or Julie, I'm sorry.
Julie from Washington State.
I think we've had Julie before.
I do think so.
Let's see.
Hello, Julie.
Hello, Rudy.
How are you?
Oh, I'm happy to talk to you as usual.
Good.
So what do you have to tell us?
Well, I just wanted to tell you that you're such a great patriot.
And I love everything you're doing for the United States.
Well, thank you.
That's a very nice message on the 4th of July or the 5th of July to hear that, particularly with all the criticism that you get and lawsuits and all kinds of other things.
But thank you.
I'm glad somebody appreciates it.
I do.
I watch all of your, all of everything that you do.
And I like, you know, what Maria Ryan had to say.
You know, you're just a great guy.
Well, we have a really nice, Maria and Ted, and we're a great team.
You know, we went to Ellis Island and to the Statue of Liberty today as a group.
I know you did!
I think that's great!
Is that great?
So when you come to New York, we'll get you tickets.
How's that?
Oh, you don't know how much I would love to Well, you come to New York and you let us know and make sure you keep everything going well there in Washington, all across the country.
Thank you, Julie.
So, Mayor, why don't we play a short clip from our, I took some video.
Oh my goodness, can I see it too?
Yeah, you'll be able to watch it right here.
This is our trip this morning.
We took the 8 o'clock boat, didn't we?
The 9 o'clock boat?
I don't remember.
We took an early boat.
Music Well, that was it.
We got some more.
We have some more clips.
I thought I was gonna see like people waving and you know, but it was
more I What
The mic is- the mic was closed, but I don't notice if you noticed how foggy it was.
I don't think that's regular fog.
I do think that's still some of the fire coming down from Canada.
Is that right, doctor?
Oh, there was a warning about... That's right, I did hear that.
There was a warning today in New York about air quality.
This is affecting Washington D.C.
too, by the way.
Right down the coast, I don't know about...
I mean, it could escape Philadelphia.
It depends on how it goes down, but they're having this problem in Washington, D.C.
as well.
Mayor, we have one more phone call from Paula from New Jersey.
She would like to ask you a question about the election integrity in our country.
A very pertinent question.
That's right.
Go ahead.
Paula, you're on with the mayor.
Okay.
Okay.
Honorable Mayor, Um, I would like to discuss with you, uh, how to recognize an authentic mail-in ballot and my suggestion.
Okay.
Okay.
So, uh, you have to realize that when we look at mail, when, when mail-in ballots are looked at, there are two signatures on there.
Okay.
Now those signatures should be regarded as Okay.
as autographs of voters.
Okay, when you're looking at authentic autographs of voters, you want to toss out the forgeries.
Now, right now, there is the complication of the invention of machines called the autopen.
They can cost between as little as $2,000 to $10,000.
To 10,000!
And they will reproduce a signature identically.
That's correct.
So, tell us what the point is.
Tell me the point.
The point is that if nursing homes, prisons, Mental institutions, if they have people there who have ballots harvested from their signatures,
And that they would not know that this is occurring.
Well, this happened in several places, maybe a number.
Certainly in Wisconsin, there's a report.
There's a report, there's a report written by a former Supreme Court Justice that, I forget the numbers here, because this happened after the election contest.
The gentleman did the report about a year later.
So I don't remember it in the same kind of detail.
I would have gone to court.
But he found a number of situations in which people with dementia, people with Alzheimer's, people with the kind of condition Biden has, but maybe even worse, I guess, never voted.
And never should have been asked to vote by the staff of the hospital.
But they sent around people eliciting votes and There were votes cast.
And the family, when they found out that their relative, who they had been able to talk to for four years, voted, they were very upset.
And they were given some kind of a cockamamie explanation by the nursing home.
The people came in from the Democrat Party, got the vote.
I can remember a distinct situation like that, distinct situation like that in Wisconsin, vaguely remembered in other places.
But what you're talking about is bigger than that.
And that is machines actually producing the ballots.
Because when you have to make up hundreds of thousands of votes like they did in Pennsylvania, you're not going to do it by just sitting there and You know, getting a bunch of party regulars to knock off the... They use machines!
And you can detect that in a minute.
Now, this is the reason why your friend here, Giuliani, knew as a prosecutor that this was a conspiracy from the very beginning.
This is what happened in five states on the night of the election.
They closed down the voting, and then they started counting votes.
And they threw the Republicans out.
The Republicans didn't get a chance to inspect the ballot.
They didn't get a chance to see the absentee ballot.
In Pennsylvania, I can't think of one that we got to see.
Maybe at the very end we got to see a few.
In Georgia, they fought us like tooth and nail.
I mean, they even threw one guy out who came in to do it and thought he had a court order.
No matter how much I challenge them, they never would turn over the ballots or allow us to inspect them forensically.
And, you know, I made the point then to challenge them even more if you're so sure that the election is correct.
What are you afraid if we go through all the paper ballots?
You can stand there and watch.
We won't destroy them.
We just want our expert who can examine paper to go through them.
He'd be able to tell if it were a machine or a pen, for example.
He'd be able to tell if it was repetitious stroking, one person doing 100 in a row, 200 in a row.
But the most important thing he'd be able to tell is that it wasn't done on the official paper that was the ballot that was sent out.
Because at least in several big, big places, we had evidence that, or what I should say is leaks.
source information which because we didn't get the paper we were never able to to to document that uh they were using just paper paper whatever paper they could get and this had been contracted to a specific station which had a particular quality of paper so now i could compare that quality of paper to the phony ballot here's phony ballot number one here's phony ballot number 100 000 and finally it gets even worse than that because they're they're doing it that quickly A lot of the absentee ballots observed in Pennsylvania and in Georgia, and I remember those two in particular, it's also true elsewhere, but I remember the witnesses as to those two, or the reading the reports there, were paper that wasn't folded.
Now, please pay attention to this detail.
This is why being a prosecutor and a lawyer is very, very rigorous if you're good at it.
If it's not folded, it can't be an absentee ballot.
Absentee ballots in almost every state have to be done by mail.
You can't just walk in with an open absentee ballot and hand it to somebody.
Now, why can't you do that?
You can't do it because it would no longer be an anonymous ballot.
Number two, it's against the law.
And number three, you get an envelope to put the ballot in.
And the envelope is more than just an envelope.
It is what Paula was pointing out.
It's a document that has a place for a signature on the envelope.
Because you're eventually going to separate the envelope from the ballot, so you don't find out how the person voted.
So now I have all the absentee ballots, they're all in envelopes, they're all folded.
I take one out, I hold it up, like you remember seeing with the Chads, with the Republican on one side and the Democrat on the other, except there was no Republican on any side in the crooked Democrat states.
Not a single one, and no judge seemed to give a damn.
And hundreds of thousands of votes were counted this way.
They hold up the envelope, the Democrat looks at it, the Republican looks at it, they have a sample of the signature below, usually in a computer, and if it looks at all bad, they challenge it and they put it aside, and then an expert will examine it.
That's the way it's been done in honest elections, time immemorial.
That was, in the states that were the crooked Democrat states, where they rigged the election, that was not done almost uniformly.
The public never got to see that piece of paper.
It was handled by Democratic county officials, all of whom owe their election to the Democrat party.
In Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia, it was so bad, even though Pam Bondi Got a court order.
She wasn't allowed for 40 or 50 minutes to see the paper because they went and got it reversed.
Because even, you know, if she had like 45 minutes with that paper, it would have blown the whole thing up.
So, um, I hope I made that clear enough.
Sometimes it's hard for people to get that and I'll explain it.
I'll bring in an expert at some point and explain that to you.
But if you ever need real, never want to create real problems for yourself about Was the election stolen or not?
The condition of those absentee ballots, boy.
Wow.
And Mayor, I can, you know, being from Michigan, I can tell you firsthand from experience that the city of Detroit, Wayne County, have just a plethora of issues and have for my entire lifetime.
This isn't something, and we talked about it even before, 2020, right?
And how you can't even audit the Detroit vote and it's a known fact and everyone accepts that you can't audit it because the records are so poorly kept in these precincts.
It's absolutely absurd.
So you bring up a good point and in Pennsylvania, and I can tell you just from first-hand experience, In Michigan, in the count, it was not done the way you just described.
It's called Cobo Hall.
You might be familiar with a lot of what happened there.
Sure.
A truck came in at three in the morning with a whole bunch of ballots in Cobo Hall.
And these are just facts.
There are three witnesses to that.
Those witnesses were virtually tortured.
One of them worked for one of the companies.
And that is a fact that a truck appeared At that time.
So we're not making any baseless assertions.
These are all just facts.
We're reciting facts of what happened.
Well, these are facts in the sense that this is what people will testify to.
I wasn't there.
You weren't there.
And those of you listening weren't there.
In fact, you weren't there at any of the crimes that get prosecuted or not.
How do you do it?
You do it based on witnesses.
This is the only case in which witnesses weren't allowed.
And that's the most concerning part about everything that 2020 was, how quickly you weren't even allowed to raise questions.
It's not even us raising questions.
You weren't allowed to bring forward questions that were being raised by others under oath across this country.
That is precisely what happened.
There are affidavits of people who say... Thousands!
Or there's a woman in Michigan who says exactly what Ted said and that she was trained to cheat.
She was taught how to take a phony ballot that may or may not have been folded and pair it with a registration of a person who presumably didn't vote.
Now here's where they got caught.
Because they had to make up so many votes, Pennsylvania being the worst, They were kind of sloppy in pairing the phony ballot with the registration.
So how do you explain 17,000 people in Pittsburgh coming in and having voted already, but they didn't?
Somebody voted for them, absentee, but they say they didn't?
Or I'll make it smaller, you get it down to just one person.
One young lady I remember on the witness stand in Georgia, who started crying on the witness stand.
This was before the state legislature.
No court would ever hear this.
Not gonna hear witnesses.
Courts don't hear witnesses.
The first time ever I ever heard that.
But she testified that she walked in and they insisted she had already voted.
And she said, in fact, not only didn't I vote, I've never voted.
May 18th, this is my first vote.
I've never voted.
Did you get absentee ballots?
Yes, I did, but I ignored them because I want the honor of casting my first ballot in person.
They said, well, you voted here.
Yes, you voted.
I'm sorry, I didn't vote.
And she started crying when she was testifying.
She said, and they were very nasty to me.
I said, was it in a Democratic district?
She said, oh, yeah, about 80%.
Mayor, so does this mean, we haven't even talked too much about ballot harvesting, which occurred, of course, in Nevada, California, Arizona.
Tell people what that means.
I mean, a lot of people know what it means, a lot of people don't know what it means.
And it's used for a number of things.
And it could be legal or illegal.
Exactly.
So there, you know, in places like Nevada, it's how Democrats really perform well, right?
In Clark County, in Las Vegas, with the unions, you can have somebody Collect other ballots, right?
And so it gets to a point, and this is where you start to cross the line of legality.
You have activists with voter, with information for registered voters in Nevada.
Let's use Nevada as an example.
Again, this is what happens.
I'm not giving a specific case, but what happens for sure.
And these people go around And they, well, they don't even have to go around, right?
They can sit there and fill out ballots and match them up with people that are registered to vote.
And as the mayor just described, sometimes you go back to these, to people that had supposedly vote, voted based off the records and you ask them and they never, and they tell you, we didn't vote.
Yeah.
And so what happened was you have people, activists going around Again, I say go around.
You have activists who will take ballots, fill them out on behalf of registered voters, names on a list, and then turn those in.
Yes.
And by the hundreds, by the thousands, there's really no limit.
Now, the ballot harvesting at one point was pretty much thoroughly illegal.
About half the states prohibit it, maybe more.
And the other almost half or half allow it.
But at one point it was considered to be completely illegal.
If you want to vote, you get up off your backside and you go vote.
And you do absentee votes only if necessary.
Every time I did an absentee ballot in New York, and I did quite a bit between 2003 and 2016 because I traveled a lot.
So I would always apply for an absentee ballot just in case I was traveling on election day.
Sometimes I didn't use it because I would be able to vote on election day, but other times I did.
And so I'm very familiar with it.
I also did poll watching when I was a youngster.
So I remember I remember the scene that I tried to paint for you from the chads, you know, there's a, there's the person pulling out the votes.
There's the Republican here, the Democrats there, the lesser parties there.
If it's a primary, it's the three candidates in the primary here, here, and there.
And they look, you look at the vote and you make objections.
Now it isn't perfect because these people are not signature experts.
They're not FBI, you know, examiners.
But what they can do is, if they see obvious mistakes, they can put it aside, and then you can ask for such an examination.
Now, in an election of this magnitude, and with all the time that was wasted, I mean, for example, Georgia counted the same phony votes three times, and would never allow a forensic examination of the ballots by an independent third party.
What's the use of counting the same votes three times?
We weren't objecting it, though.
That paper is there.
What we were objecting to is in that paper are phony votes.
Let us examine the paper and we'll satisfy ourselves.
Give us three or four days with that paper and we'll say yes, you're right and we're sorry or no, you're wrong.
But they didn't want to risk no, you're wrong.
I wonder why.
That's an important point the mayor said about a lot of these folks that we want to, of course, encourage people to volunteer and be engaged from a civic We want to watch this right from the very beginning of the states that have endless elections.
We need people.
And it's not about being partisan or being, you know, trying to root for a Republican.
We need good people who have the best interests of the country at heart to sign up, to volunteer, to work these polling sites.
Yes, you need the partisan.
It's up to the campaigns.
Yeah, I'm going to make another point.
We need objective poll watchers.
They didn't do this.
They didn't do this in every Democrat area by any means.
They did it in Democrat cities that are notoriously corrupt, where there are numerous prosecutions for corruption.
You know them.
You know they're corrupt, if you know anything.
And if they take bribes, they shake people down.
They're not going to cheat on the vote?
If they dominate things and nobody can tell them not to, and the courts will go their way.
Remember, in New York, I can't save all of the other places.
In New York, the judges are appointed by the same people that are counting the ballots, by and large, the Democrat party.
And they're selected only because the county leader puts them on the ballot.
They don't go up to heaven and get selected.
They think they did, but they don't.
They get selected by a party boss.
A machine boss.
That's right.
So, Mayor, what would you advise the nominee in 2024?
I think you and I have a good idea.
Well, what I would advise is to put together a professional voter integrity effort to hire professionals and also have volunteers to supplement it.
And to train them really very, very well on all the techniques that we know of.
We now know them all, and if we don't know them, if you train yourself on all the ones you know, you'll be up on the new one they figure out.
Someday I'll explain to you how that happens because I've done that in training exercises before.
But to have them ready for, to see all these things, to challenge from the beginning, If they're going to start the election a month before and they start in with not letting us see the ballots a month before, we go to court right then and we start yelling and screaming right then.
We just yell and scream so much it'll just require them to do something or it'll point out to the American people they're in the process of doing the same thing all over again.
But let's do it before the election rather than afterwards.
Having lawyers ready in these key states.
Yeah, let's watch.
Let's assert all the rights that we have to inspection.
When they interfere with it, let's go to court and go to the public.
Immediately.
Immediately.
And let's have a large group that supports us.
So if they won't let us look at ballots in Pennsylvania that are being submitted, We should be yelling and screaming all over Pennsylvania, you know, they're up to their same dirty tricks.
We should be allowed to see what they're doing.
The ballots do not belong to them.
And because they say they are vote inspectors, you know, for the county, I'm talking now about not most counties in America.
I'm talking about special counties where large numbers of these people over the years have gone to jail because they're crooked Democrats.
That's what I'm talking about.
And where they put judges on the bench that carry out the will of the Democrat Party.
That's only a few places.
It's not most of America, thank God.
So you can marshal your resources and have people in charge of it.
You know, one of my great mentors, Judge Lloyd McMahon, taught me, to catch a thief, you got to think like a thief.
So I've made the point to President Trump and to others that you take someone like Bob Costello and me and Who had to go through this whole thing.
We now know all their existing tricks.
I can turn that into a protocol for trying to, if not avoid them, limit them.
And then here's the issue.
Suppose they come up with a new trick.
Well, the better prepared you are on all the old ones, the faster and the easier you're going to come up with a new one, because it's probably a variation of some kind.
That's how I did emergency management, and it was the best in the country.
That's how you would do this.
And maybe we're running out of time before 24, but I would say some good news is, and I know I'm with the mayor a lot, but we hear from folks, and we know there are people out there that want to support these sorts of efforts.
There are some efforts underway.
Now, we can save this for another night, whether or not you feel... You know, it's in the process of formation, and some of it is actually Well thought out.
Some of it needs a little bit more, but I think you have the theory and we'll go over it a little bit more.
And I don't mind if they know about it.
People say, well, if they know about it.
No, no.
I don't mind if they know about it because actually if they know about it and they see how effective it is, it'll cut some of it down.
Deterrence is not a bad thing.
I mean, actually it's one of the main One of the main purposes of the criminal law.
Oh, my goodness.
Well, that's how they keep us from talking about it, right?
They deter us from even talking about it by baring anyone who does.
That's how they keep Trump from getting lawyers, because they try to torture his lawyers like yours truly.
That's right.
But please, I say to other lawyers, it's worth it.
It's worth it to have your integrity.
Oh, absolutely.
You can wake up comfortably every morning, Mayor, knowing that you are fighting for what is... I say that to my friends at Getter.
This is your special microphone, Getter.
Sorry, our Getter mic, of course.
And so as we enter soccer time here, Mayor, again, we're celebrating Freedom Month.
We are celebrating Freedom Month.
We will have another celebration tomorrow at the beginning or the end of the show.
And today we congratulate Judge Dowdy on his brilliant, brilliant opinion, finding that the Biden administration is engaged in the biggest deprivation of free speech ever in the history of this country.
And that it has to be restrained in its, at least for now, until it's thought through, in its contact with social media, because the two of them together have really become a quasi-government agency in order to exist for the benefit of Joe Biden and the Democrat Party.
That's why those things I told you about today, you don't read about in the crooked New York Times.
Well, thank you very, very much.
We'll be back tomorrow night.
We'll have, I'm sure, plenty more on these subjects and others, and maybe we'll have a little more on the case that can't be solved, cocaine case.
All right?
We're gonna see, you know, they usually always tell me you can't do it, you can't do it, you can't change New York, you can't solve that case, you can't get the mafia.
I never thought they'd ever say that about a little cocaine case.
This may never be solved.
This is political, right?
Why don't they just all cash in on the political?
Aren't they just a bunch of whores?
At least they didn't lie about it.
I say a bunch of whores. I mean, to say that this this may never get solved.
How would you know it can't be solved on the first day unless you don't want it solved?
And the correct New York pronunciation of whores is who is.
Hoo-ers.
Just to let everyone know.
How about prostitutes?
Is that better?
But you can't call them anymore, Mayor.
What do you call them?
They're called sex workers now.
I'm not talking about sex workers.
I'm talking about politicians.
Oh.
Oh.
You agree with me.
They are right.
Oh my goodness.
They're one and the same.
They're the same thing.
Do you know what the confidence in our government is in the latest poll?
Guess.
Go ahead.
Let's say half the Democrats, so let's say 15 percent.
What do you say?
I'm going to say 7 percent, sir.
31 percent.
Damn.
31 percent.
Every other government has greater confidence.
Some of them go over 50, meaning governments in Europe, etc.
But I guess that does check out Mayor Wright because- That's the Biden government, by the way.
You know, the numbers were when Trump was president, over 50 percent.
You always add 10 to any poll the legacy media puts out on Trump.
Of course.
You always add 10, right?
All right, ladies and gentlemen, you have a great evening.
We'll close out with our song.
And we're going to have a nice little song, and God bless America!
Long live our 13 states!
Long live the United States!
God save our states!
Make us victorious!
Happy and glorious, No tyrants over us, God save our states!
We'll fear no tyrants not, Nor stern oppressions wrought, Till time's no more.
May union bless our land while we with heart and hand our mutual rights defend on our free shore.