All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 24, 2022 - Rudy Giuliani
01:00:49
Be Prepared for the Upcoming Election. Warnings from a Fascist Playbook | September 24 2022 | Ep 274
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello, this is Rudy Giuliani back with another edition of Rudy's Common Sense.
Today we are going to devote ourselves to kind of a lesson, or lessons, so that we can be prepared for the propaganda of the next, well, the remainder of the month of September, October, and early November.
In other words, the election propaganda, which has now become a matter of I would say almost repetitious behavior on the part of most of the Democrats, certainly the Democrat crooked leadership.
And I was going to put at the top of my list fascist tactics, because all these things that I mentioned you could find listed in recommendations from Marx, Engels, Hitler, Lenin, Trotsky, Mao, and Saul Alinsky.
Let me tell you the four categories I put them in.
There are more, but I'm trying to get this down to a manageable group, and so you can recognize them as they are used during this campaign.
You will see they've all been used almost to the point of ad nauseam since Well, certainly on a major scale since 2015, 2016.
These have been all used, actually, some of them go way back in Democrat use of tactics.
And to a large extent, the influence of the Communist Party within the Democrat Party has always been there, mostly overwhelmed by the good Democrats.
Like the AFL-CIO was formed to fight the communists in the labor movement that had worked their way into the labor movement and never get a good job with the tea to the union, but I'm not even sure it's part of the AFL-CIO.
I think they are now.
Well, here are the tactics and then we'll give you the examples.
And then I'd like you to communicate with me at RudyGiulianiCS.com.
Add some, if I've left some out that you think are significant.
Not the minor ones, but the significant ones that are capable of repetition.
Or tell me you think I'm wrong.
Alright?
So here are the tactics we're talking about.
Projection of wrongdoing.
Projection is really a technical, psychological term.
And we'll describe that in a minute.
Creation of crimes.
In other words, framing people for things they didn't do.
Or taking a minor wrongdoing, usually not considered a crime, and escalating it into a crime.
Or what we call, you know, weaponizing politics with criminal prosecution.
Perpetration of big lies.
Which is usually done, I should have put repetition down here, which is usually done by repetition and is quite successful because of control of the media, which the Democrat party has had for quite some time, similar to the communists and the Nazis and the other forms of communists and totalitarians.
Controlling most of that media is crucial to their success and you can't say they don't control it.
And finally, destruction of enemies.
So we have projection of wrongdoing, creation of crimes, framing, perpetration of big lies, and destruction of enemies.
We could say total destruction.
This goes from canceling, to getting a person fired, to getting a person ostracized, To getting a person demonized and then ultimately to see if you can put the person in prison or at least ruin their reputation with criminal prosecutions that end up dropped or defeated but, you know, the dropping and the defeating is nowhere near as helpful to restoring reputation.
As the actual prosecution is to destroy.
It was the Secretary of Labor in the Reagan administration who was falsely prosecuted, who after he was acquitted by a jury, went to the press and said, where do I go to get my reputation back?
Well, there's nowhere to go, really, except hopefully the goodwill of the American people.
And the American people are good.
It's their leaders right now that are not just bad.
I would say we've had bad leaders before.
Don't know that we've ever experienced this level of evil.
Yes, yes, yes, I say evil.
I think the picture that Biden created in that last almost satanical speech was one of Satan.
Looked like he'd emerged from Hades, hell.
And as I said at the time, being an opera fan, it reminded me of scenes I've seen in Gounod's Faust, or Boito's Mephistopheles, or Berlioz's A Damnation of Faust, where Mephistopheles, the devil, comes and takes the soul of Faust.
It's taken quite a few souls at the top of the Democrat party.
Biden family, great example.
Clinton family, another great example.
So now let's look at what I'm talking about, so this has more meaning to you, and therefore you'll be able to pick it up as we are going along.
And as soon as I start giving you these examples, I think you'll know exactly, if you don't know already, I think you'll know exactly what I'm referring to here.
The first one I said was projection.
Projection specifically of wrongdoing.
Now, projection is a psychological... I don't know if it's an illness or practice.
I imagine it's some form of illness.
And what it means is that you ascribe to other people the wrongdoing that you engage in.
And I think at a less serious level, it can be, well, if you do it, you just assume everybody does.
If you take bribes, you just assume everybody does, because you just, part of your dealing with your guilt, if you have any, is you just assume it's quite common.
So if you take kickbacks as a public official, which is not uncommon, let's say in Albany, in New York, or in state legislatures throughout the country, but most prominently in Democrat states, you just assume everybody does.
Or sometimes if it gets really systemic like it did in the New York Police Department back in the 60s and 70s, which I prosecuted as part of the Knapp Commission, you forced a few innocent people to take bribes and there aren't witnesses around to testify against you.
So then you just believe everybody does.
It gets to the level I think really of pathological when you attribute your criminal activities to other people And you know that it's false.
You're not even laboring under the misapprehension that they do what you do, or you find out it's false and continue it.
So what is our best example of that, which I think will be an unfortunate black mark on human history, and American history in particular, forever, as long as we start teaching history again.
And that would be the Russian collusion Hoax is much too mild a term.
Russian collusion.
Crime.
Conspiracy.
In which, after It really had its genesis in 1516.
Hard to know.
I believe it went back to 15, but the only evidence that I could give you, and I give you solid evidence of that, is that it started in 16, and that it was alive and well about mid-January of 2016, when there was a meeting at the White House, at the security One of the security councils there, I think it was the National Security Council, but there was a meeting with Ukrainian prosecutors and officials.
And after a sort of setup in which they were supposed to discuss corruption in Ukraine, which could take a lot longer than they had, they were asked by American officials, specifically two people that work for Vice President Biden, to gather dirt on one specific Republican, And then any dirt they could come up with on people in the Trump campaign.
This was mid-January of 2016.
It took place in the White House.
And if you go back to my podcast, you can see complete descriptions of it and witnesses to it.
And the two people that pushed it the hardest were Biden representatives on the National Security Council.
And then there was quite a bit of activity that flowed from that.
There was a paid representative of the Democratic National Committee that went into great detail with a middle-to-high-level Ukrainian official about what they expected from the Ukrainian government.
There's testimony about that.
So what you basically had was the absolute creation out of whole cloth.
of the story that Donald Trump was colluding, whatever that means, with Russia.
And then it took on various aspects.
He was very friendly with Putin.
He made a lot of money in Russia.
He went there and engaged in all kinds of sexual activity with Russian prostitutes, to the point where he urinated on a bed According to the Steele dossier that I believe Obama had slept in.
This all culminated in the Steele dossier, which it turns out is entirely untrue and paid for.
Paid for by, at least what you can trace, 1.1 million dollars by Hillary Clinton and her campaign.
Don't know if the Democrat National Committee chipped in for it and probably did, but the 1.1 million is the bare minimum.
There are rumors, I would have to say hearsay evidence, but strong enough so you'd have to investigate this out, and of course it never has been in a grand jury, that considerably more money was being paid.
for digging up dirt that would destroy Manafort, Donald Jr., and Donald Trump, as well as yours truly.
And that is all now documented by a significant number of witnesses You can see it on my early podcast in the range of podcasts two to 10, 11.
You can hear the testimony from the witnesses.
I do not believe the FBI, although this was all given to them two years ago or more, have ever interviewed any of these people.
Not a single one.
Somehow they can just decide from where they're sitting in Washington that the people are lying.
Turns out they're telling the truth.
Turns out it's now proven that they are.
But they never bothered to interview any of them.
So, they developed this charge of Russian collusion.
They were told before the campaign was over by the FBI.
That it had no substance.
They were told things like, well, Peter Strzok wrote to his mistress or texted his mistress.
There's no there there after investigating it.
Another very high level official after looking at it said it's insane.
It's just not correct.
When they undertook their Their second investigation of it, and also referred it to the Mueller group, in which they spent 40 to 50 million dollars of your money, almost everyone at the highest level of the FBI knew it was untrue.
And they went to pass it on to Democrat members of Congress.
Specific conversation with the lying Shifty Schiff, in which he was told that it was untrue, even though he represented that he had direct witnesses of Trump being involved in Russian collusion.
Those witnesses have never been produced, nor has he ever been held to account for it, because we do not have justice in this country.
We are now almost, I would say, officially, the law enforcement apparatus, federal law, is run by the state, the Democrat state.
And it does not investigate Things that are harmful to Clinton, Biden, or indirectly or directly to them because of their collusion with them, conspiracy with them.
I mean, we now know why the FBI doesn't investigate it because a lot of it comes back to the FBI.
So that's what they do.
That's what they did.
They made up a false charge Of Trump being compromised by the Russians, or having gotten political information from the Russians, illegally, illegally.
And they used that during the campaign to try to defeat him.
And there are witnesses that will explain the whole timing of that, and do explain it, all of which are ignored by the FBI.
And then after it was over and they knew for sure it wasn't true, they went on for several years of the Mueller investigation and didn't really give it up until Mueller rendered his report saying it was no evidence of Russian collusion.
Some of them still didn't give it up.
Now, why is that projection?
That's projection because at the very time that they were coming up with this, they were colluding with, whatever that means, conspiring with, to get dirt campaign information with the Ukrainians.
I mean, the meeting, the first meeting in the White House is exactly that.
The first meeting in the White House is akin to what they charged Donald Jr.
with, or tried to, in meeting with a Russian woman who claimed that she had information about Hillary, but never actually brought the information, never actually discussed the information.
It was never actually used.
It was never actually pursued.
In the case of the Democrats, the information was not proffered to the Democrats.
They asked for it.
They pressed for it.
And they got it in the form of a completely fraudulent black book that contained, theoretically, the names of people bribed in Ukraine by the Russian-oriented party.
Manafort being one of them, which any number of witnesses, I count about eight, would say was fraudulent.
The FBI never produced it at Manafort's trial.
There is evidence that a forensic report rendered it useless, and the FBI has never been willing to turn it over, even though they have it.
So, in essence, they did with the Ukrainians what they charged falsely Trump and his people doing with the Russians.
Except in their case, because they control 80% of the media, they were able to dominate the media with it for three years.
Campaign and significant interference with his presidency.
In the case of the Ukrainian collusion, it was dismissed by the press as having been debunked.
Although it had never been investigated.
And although his lawyer, I'm the one who put it out, of course, and found it, I would say, show me the debunking report.
There is none.
But no one would listen to that until the hard drive was found.
And then about 15 months after it, and they agreed that it was valid after lying and trying to destroy so many lives over it.
And now it is without question and without doubt.
That the same people that are pushing January 6th and alternate electors and Georgia, all of which they say is somehow criminal or wrong, these are the same people that lied for three to four years over Russian collusion, straight to your face, with the assistance of the media that either knew that they lied or didn't care.
Why wouldn't they be doing the same thing now?
Good question.
That's what we mean by projection.
That's one example.
We could say another example.
We'll just mention them now quickly.
Another example would be Attributing to Trump a conversation with the president of Ukraine, a conversation that was in the nature of a bribe or extortionate, in that there was a quid pro quo, you know, you won't get military aid unless you investigate Biden and his son.
Now, there's every reason to believe that the whistleblower who was never disclosed is one of the same people that was involved three or four years earlier.
In the crime, if it is a crime, of obtaining false information from Ukraine.
But in any event, whether it is or it isn't, that description of the conversation, although put out falsely by Shifty Schiff and some of his people, it turns out that when you go to the conversation, either the transcript or even President Zelensky's description of it as a perfectly proper conversation, There was no mention of military aid.
There was no mention of withholding military aid.
There was mention of a meeting, but the meeting had already been set up.
They pretended that it was going to be set up.
It had already been set up.
And there was a request to report criminal information of the highest level involving crimes at the highest levels of both government to the United States.
Just a request.
They made that appear improper because they withheld, during that period of time, the hard drive that was in possession of the FBI and the Attorney General, who knew that if it were put out would completely render the President innocent, and with perfect justification for doing what he did, more than enough.
But they withheld the hard drive for that reason among others, which is heinous.
In a criminal trial that is called violating the Brady Rule, and at that level it would lead to your disbarment of prosecution.
But they went ahead and let the impeachment happen.
Of course, it ended up with an acquittal.
That's another example of projection, because that's exactly what Biden did.
When he said to the president, in this case Poroshenko, the crookedest man in Ukraine, that he wanted the prosecutor dismissed from the case involving the guy who was paying him and his son, Mykola Zlochevsky, and his son Hunter.
You've got to realize that was a quid, a pro, and a quo.
You don't get your billion unless you dismiss the prosecutor.
Something of value in exchange for official conduct.
The official conduct is firing the prosecutor.
The something of action is the 1 billion dollars that would be required because all the money had been stolen from the treasury of Ukraine and it couldn't exist without that 1 billion dollars.
They say the prosecutor was fired because he was corrupt.
It turns out there's not a single stitch of evidence of corruption, nor have they ever Given any specific as to what he was corrupt about or for.
Did he take money?
Did he throw cases?
No specifics.
There's no indication anywhere in any file of any investigation of him.
And there are numerous witnesses that say it's not true.
None of which have been given the courtesy of an interview to see, could that be a lie?
Since it was never mentioned when he was originally dismissed, and there were other substantial motives to get rid of him, like Zolchevsky, who was offering millions and millions of dollars to let him out of the case.
Zolchevsky is the owner of Burisma, which is the company that employed Hunter Biden and paid Joe Biden to protect him, which is exactly what happened.
That's what was going on when Biden bribed The president of Ukraine, to get rid of the prosecutor, wasn't only protecting his son, the big bucks were protecting one of the biggest organized criminals in Ukraine, Russia-oriented organized criminals, Mykola Zlochevsky.
That's the reason why Hunter and his partner Devin Archer were paid bare minimum six, seven million, maybe as much altogether with Joe getting 50%, 15 million.
You didn't pay that to Hunter.
We always wondered why was it being paid?
Well, the evidence is there now that it was being paid in order to save Zelishevsky from going to prison and losing his 20 or $30 billion company.
And Poroshenko took bribes from him.
And according to the evidence in the Ukraine altogether, people raked in about $100 million.
The Bidens attributing maybe 15 to 20 million to the Bidens.
There's also a witness left behind there that the FBI never interviewed, who said she can identify the foreign bank account.
She's never been interviewed.
So they project that to Trump.
With the Ukraine conversation, but they actually did that.
You could go on and on, you know, they call the January 16 violent insurrection What they're really doing is projecting, let me make sure I have the numbers right here of this, what they really are doing is projecting the riots that took place in 2020, which they tacitly and beyond tacitly supported.
that led to at a minimum the death of 27 people, 2,000 police officers injured,
damages of over a billion dollars and disproportionate number of people
destroyed financially and otherwise injured.
I mean thousands injured that went to the hospital that were African American.
Those were violent insurrectionist acts, some of them done against state capitals or courthouses.
Of course, January 6th cannot be justified, but it was nothing like that.
First of all, not a single person was found to have a weapon, unlike the real insurrectionists of 2020, many of whom had weapons and used them.
Shot people, knifed people, broke open windows with hatchets.
It was all violence.
Not only that, people involved in January 6th, hundreds have been arrested.
Numerous ones have been held illegally for 14, 15, 16 months.
In the case of the actual violent criminals of 2020, they were all let out just about with a great deal of help from From Harris, Vice President Harris, particularly in Minnesota, and with the help of staffers, people working for Biden and Harris, putting up bail money from them, and also with the help of Soros-elected district attorneys in most of those jurisdictions who let them go free.
Remember, Soros was the big funder of the DA who let them go free.
He's the biggest funder for the Democratic Party, including Biden and Harris.
Apparently, Harris was his son's choice for president.
And finally, Soros is the biggest funder for Black Lives Matter and for Antifa.
It all fits together.
And that's what projection is.
Creation of crimes.
Well, we'll take a short break and we'll get to creation of crimes.
Not long ago, Mike Lindell, the inventor of MyPillow, and his team fit me for my very own MyPillow.
They also introduced me to their wide assortment of other incredible products, like their mattress topper, their sheets, towels, slippers, and more.
Sleep is incredibly important to me, and I can assume for all of you.
It's time you give MyPillow a try and see for yourself.
Listeners have helped build MyPillow into the incredible company it is today, Mike Lindell wants to give back to all of you.
You can get great discounts on MyPillow products by going to MyPillow.com right now and seeing each of the specially priced items, including those in the Radio Listener Special Square.
You're going to see rotational offers up to 66% off on products like their pillows, mattress topper, geezer sheets, but also new products like their slippers, weighted blankets, robes, and waffle blankets.
All MyPillow products come with a 60-day money-back guarantee.
Enter promo code Rudy for these great specials.
That's mypillow.com.
Let me just give you at least the numbers that I was able to get from a report that actually just has a time period of May 25 to July 31st of 2020.
to July 31st of 2020.
There were 8,700 protests in that short period of time, 574 riots involving significant violence and weapons.
No weapons at January 6th, and only one, not 574.
There were 26 people killed in those riots and over 20,000 injuries, including well over 2,000 police officers.
That's just May 25 to July 31.
And a significant number were against government buildings.
One, an insurrection.
Maybe I would call that an insurrection.
And then you had Democrat Party officials, including Harris's staff and Biden's staff, helping with the bail when it was set for the criminals who did it.
And you had the criminals who did it just being freed en masse by DAs who were elected with millions of dollars from Soros, who announced before they were elected that they were going to let 40 to 50 percent of the people free who were in jail.
So, that is the projection of January 6th, which, no guns, nobody dead inside the Capitol or killed by the protesters.
One person killed inside the Capitol was Ashley Babbitt, who was one of the pro-Trump people.
And the killing is one, to say the least, that raises significant questions that it was a homicide.
It has never been mentioned even by the January 6th Committee, which is sure proof that the January 6th Committee is a disgusting political endeavor, which is just a continuation of all of this.
Which gets us to the second thing, which is the creation of crimes.
In other words, taking things that are not criminal and pretending that they are.
Collusion with Russia might very well be one.
All throughout the Three to four years, $40 million, $50 million phony attempt to frame Trump was the issue.
Is it a crime?
Conspiracy is a crime, to commit a crime.
What's the crime?
The crime is getting information from foreign sources.
It's a violation of the campaign finance law, if it is a crime.
The campaign finance law prohibits taking money from foreigners.
Is taking information the same as taking money?
If it is, then it would be conspiracy to take something of value, information would be considered value, from a foreigner.
That was the crime that they alleged, which Let's call that half made up, because it's not settled that that's a crime.
Could be, might not be.
And by the way, that is exactly, so we go back to projection, that's exactly what they actually did with Ukraine.
Trump never did it, it was false.
But even what they were falsely accusing of was probably not a crime.
Interesting, if you go to the Mueller report, I used to know the exact footnote, big long footnote explains that Mueller doesn't think it's a crime.
He doesn't think it's a provable crime or a chargeable crime, because how do you value information?
How do you put a value on it?
There are people who say, well, you do value information because sometimes you pay for it.
There are people who say, well, sometimes paying for it isn't enough.
This is a criminal act.
It has to be very specific.
In any way, we don't charge campaign finance too often.
So when we do it to a president, it better be clear.
In any event, It was a frame.
First of all, it never happened, and number two, if it did, 50% of the lawyers and experts say it's a crime and 50% say it isn't.
You don't prosecute a president for something that's a 50% crime.
And then we have ones that are not crimes at all, like the conversation with Zelensky.
There was no crime there.
He didn't offer him anything.
He didn't extort him, he didn't demand, he asked nicely for something that if they hadn't been suppressing the hard drive, which is intolerable and inexcusable, there would have been a perfect explanation for it anyway.
But there was no crime.
They impeached him both times without showing a high crime or misdemeanor.
Just conduct they didn't like.
Very, very dangerous and very much creation of crimes.
This really is a gift to us from the Obsessed, almost insanely angry at Trump prosecutors that were hired by Mueller, who hired all Democrats, which would be totally unthinkable for anybody who wanted to be fair.
But I'm not sure Mueller, it turns out, knew what he was doing when you finally saw him testify.
Creation of crimes continues with this idea that anyone who says that the election was stolen is inciting some kind of riot, and therefore is not entitled or allowed to say that, and therefore it can be censored.
They're controlled social media, which is controlled actually by the state, and we know they have conversations now.
Many, many, many.
So it really is a state appendage.
If you say stolen election, you won't be allowed to say it.
You'll be censored for it.
You might be investigated for somehow having created the January 6th riots or other riots which haven't taken place.
They don't deal with the fact that January 6th.
Don't know that it was a riot.
It was certainly an out-of-control protest.
There was damage done to property.
There were some police officers that were injured.
The protesters were more seriously injured.
I mean, they're the only ones who got killed, and they had no weapons.
So it was somewhere between a protest and a riot.
It certainly wasn't anything like the 500, 600, 700, 800 ones that had taken place in 2020, where people were killed, billions of dollars worth of damage, property stolen.
And the law flaunted to such an extent that I think it's a carryover to today and helping to create the disrespect for the law that we see today.
What would be another crime they're making up?
The alternate electors.
What's wrong with setting up alternate electors?
They say it's a fraud.
To have a fraud similar to the phony case being brought by the Attorney General of New York, somebody has to be deceived.
The case in New York we'll have argued some other time and go through great detail on because it really is a complete piece of junk.
But the reality is it all involves representations to banks, none of whom have brought a case about this.
If they felt they were cheated, or there was an attempt to cheat them, banks sue.
They got better lawyers than the Attorney General.
They'd be, they'd have sued them years ago.
They don't, they don't, they don't not sue Donald Trump.
Go take a look.
The thing that tells you it's a phony case is there are about eight banks involved.
Well, I'm sorry, about five banks involved.
None of them have ever complained at all about any of these loans.
So what's she doing?
What does she care?
We can't even show that anybody lost any money.
Well, I mean, the same thing is true with this alternate electors.
All the truth about that was laid out.
There was substantial evidence, or at least a certain group of people believed, as I did and can support, that there was substantial evidence that if the legislature took up these cases, and it's the legislature's final judgment according to Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution, and cases of the Supreme Court acknowledging it, if the legislature took up these cases and found that the vote was fraudulent, wrong even, and that Trump had actually won, Had alternate electors not have been designated, he wouldn't have gotten the votes.
And it wasn't made up, it had been done.
You don't even know this because the crooked press doesn't tell you.
1960, it was done by Nixon and Kennedy.
Nixon had won Hawaii on election night.
Kennedy contested it.
Nixon continued, I mean, Kennedy continued to contest.
The Electoral College met.
They voted for Nixon.
Late December it turned out, after the investigation was completed, that Kennedy had won it.
Kennedy had named alternate electors and they were put in.
The same thing here.
Nobody pretended they were anything other than alternate electors.
Who are you gonna fool?
Where's the fraud?
It's another one of the many creation of crimes.
Framing.
Oh gosh, we could go on and on and on, but we're not.
We're not going to go on and on and on.
Because I want to point out that this is a big movement and we need lots of support.
You know, you see all the issues now that have come out about about abortion and everything else and we're going to have
a really extremely important podcast on that because I'm developing an analysis that I think you'll
find very very important but it's so I'm sorry if anyone is offended by this and I'm sorry if
those on whatever side of this is offended by this but it's so wonderful to see the
Supreme Court standing up for human life.
That night I said a little prayer and I thanked God.
So that's my religious belief.
Please respect it.
It's not meant to hurt anybody.
It's not meant to do anything.
It's meant to respect human life and to some extent to atone for my own mistakes about this at times.
Where I've held different positions and held different views, always personally pro-life, but thinking you could split the two, which was wrong.
And the thing that changed my mind is when they went so far as to permit the abortion of eight, nine month fetuses, which is permissible in New York.
And I think it was the laughing and cheering and standing ovation from the state legislature approved the murdering of eight and nine month old Uh, children in the womb.
And the governor of, um, Virginia suggested that a woman might have a little time after birth if she was unconscious.
And the abortion didn't, uh, didn't work to take the life of the baby.
When I heard that, um, I had already changed, but I decided they've gone too far.
They've gone too far.
Well, you know, Institutions like Patriot Mobile have been there for us in that battle and so many other battles.
Patriot Mobile is America's only Christian conservative mobile phone.
And they've been on the front lines fighting for life and fighting for these rights to protect ourselves and defend ourselves right from the very, very beginning.
Patriot Mobile is the only And Christian conservative mobile phone provider.
And they take into consideration the inflation that we're going through and have plans and will work with you so that you can afford their service.
And you get the same great service you get from all the so-called big names, and boy we know what side some of them are.
So go to patriotmobile.com slash Rudy right now.
Or call 972-PATRIOT.
Use the offer code of Rudy to get free activation.
If you're a veteran or first responder, please let them know because you'll get even more special discounts just for you.
Come and join our movement.
Make the switch today.
That's patriotmobile.com slash Rudy, patriotmobile.com slash Rudy, 1972 Patriot.
So now let's get to our last two of these tactics.
Which is perpetration of big lies and destruction of enemy.
Oh my goodness.
I mean, we've been living with big lies now from these Democrats forever and ever and ever.
And you wonder how does it work?
Russian collusion was, I guess, the best example of a big lie.
Well, when I first brought out the Biden bribe, which would have been, believe it or not, February of 2019.
The answer was, it was all debunked.
And every single Democrat, which includes 80% of the news media that day, used the word debunked!
Debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunked, debunk Or the people nobody listens to on CNN or MSNBC.
Debunk, debunk, debunk, debunk, debunk, debunk, debunk, debunk.
I don't think I'd ever heard the word debunk before.
I probably had.
So I just said, you know, like a simple little lawyer that I am, suspended now because I'm a danger by the left-wing New York Bar Association, which, you know, found most of the conservative great justices not qualified.
I said, show me the report.
I'll go away.
Show me the debunking report.
I've never seen one in all these years.
I asked Ukrainian prosecutors for their debunking report.
No, they told me it was true.
They gave me lots of reports that said it was true.
They gave me lots of witnesses that were willing to testify.
You don't have to take my word for it.
You can go back to my podcast.
Go back to my original podcast.
Want to go further back?
Go back to John Solomon's columns in 2019, where I gave him the witnesses.
He had his own too, but I gave him the main ones.
Let him tape them, including some done by Skype, because the ambassador, who eventually was removed justly, even though they lied about that, wouldn't let him come to the United States.
They had the media convinced that it was not worth covering because it was debunked without offering any proof or any discussion of what was debunked.
Biden just kept saying, I never discussed any of my son's foreign business.
Now, how implausible is that to any sensible person?
Had Trump said that or me or Lindsey Graham or someone else would have been hounded with explanations of that, proof of that.
He just said it, they just accepted it, they just repeated it for four or five years.
Until finally the suppressed hard drive, which I had before the election and knew could be proved, got some of it out but couldn't get all of it out because of the censorship.
Because we live now in a, oh, I don't know, what does Biden call it?
Semi-fascist state?
I think it's pretty close to fascist state.
There's no question that he met with 20 to 25 foreign clients.
There are pictures of it.
There are texts of it.
There are discussions of it.
There are many witnesses for it.
And some of them came forward before the election, including Mr. Bobulinski, who the FBI sort of made disappear.
He was willing to testify under oath that Biden was getting money and that Biden was deeply involved in all of the foreign Sales of his influence, let's put it that way.
They just repeat the same thing and the press says anyone who says the opposite is a criminal or a traitor or anyone saying stolen election now is an extremist even though every day a new report comes out showing that the election had significant fraud.
Some of them go so far as to show that it affected the result in the state, and Trump actually won.
Some don't go quite that far, but show you it was a terrible, terrible election, and the electoral vote is wrong.
And it may be a state which you can't declare either for Biden or Trump because of the significant fraud that went on.
I mean, to hear people say that there was no fraud, to hear Bill Barr say there was no fraud, makes me sick.
I mean, I'm going to take a picture eventually and put it on my podcast.
Just take a picture of the physical evidence sitting two rooms from here.
I mean, just Philadelphia alone, over 300 affidavits.
Just Philadelphia.
There's no question about evidence of fraud.
Watch 2,000 mules.
I know they don't want you to watch it and go see if they've produced any specific contradiction, except the same thing they did with debunked.
Faulty methodology.
They've also used the word debunked for 2,000 mules.
How?
In what way?
Which route is wrong?
We present you with actual specifics.
Witnesses in Philadelphia who saw ballots counted that Republicans, even though they demanded, requested, and got a court order, weren't allowed to observe.
They saw them counted and they saw pieces of paper that hadn't been folded, which couldn't possibly have been mail-in ballots.
We had people testify that they were trained by the Democrat Party how to cheat and then went ahead and did it.
So it isn't as if we don't produce specifics.
They don't.
None.
No specifics.
2,000 mules is wrong.
How?
That's the technology used by the FBI and CIA.
Show me one of the routes that's wrong.
Better be a lot more than one, too, because there are thousands they did.
But that's the big lie.
Now, why does it win?
Why did it win in Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Russia?
Because they control the media.
And you're not allowed to say the opposite.
I'm not allowed on.
I might mislead you.
You know, the only way you get from a lie to the truth, somebody's got to get up who's going to be accused of misleading.
Somebody misled people into finding out that the earth was round.
That's the whole basis of our First Amendment, which has been completely destroyed by Biden.
If there's any reason not to vote for Democrats, it's because they've destroyed your First Amendment.
We now have a state media.
I'm not even allowed on Fox because of stolen elections.
That's how deep the big lie went, the perpetration of the big lie.
You just say it, say it, say it.
Or the recent case by the Attorney General of New York, the headhunter, the bounty hunter, who was unethically elected, saying she'd go after one man even though she didn't have a crime.
Well, she doesn't have a crime.
But right in her press conference, Got the quote?
She refers the civil case as a crime.
So she couldn't charge a crime, nor could the DA, but why not make believe that the civil case is a crime?
If you do it enough, you'll perpetrate the big lie, and that's why I got lots of questions like, is he gonna get convicted?
The answer is no.
He can't be convicted.
It's a civil case.
But they're lying to you.
How many times do I have to show that I'm telling the truth and they're lying?
They lied.
They lied about the bribe to the president of the Ukraine.
The hard drive proves it.
I was telling the truth.
They said I was a Russian agent.
It's been proven that I'm not.
They're lying.
I'm telling the truth.
How many times do I have to catch them in lies?
Over and over and over again.
They're lying about the election.
They're lying about January 6.
They're trying to make alternate electors look like a crime.
There's nothing wrong with it.
It was absolutely in the open.
There was no fraud attached to it.
Kennedy and Nixon both did it, so there was precedent for it and was done in the open.
How many times are they going to continue to do this with the blatant lies of the party that controls the state and the media?
And then finally, They really involve total destruction of the enemy.
They're not interested in just putting you in jail, although they want to put you in jail and they've criminalized and weaponized politics.
I mean, look how many, 60 subpoenas, Look at the way they do it.
They go to the homes of, way back, they go to the homes of people who are not violent criminals in any sense of the word, and they show up dressed like stormtroopers.
Yes, remember way back when we used the word stormtroopers, we were accused of saying they were like Nazis and fascists?
Well, they are like Nazis and fascists.
You put leg irons on Peter Navarro?
Where the hell did that come from?
These people have kids.
You show up at 5 in the morning with people dressed up like soldiers?
They're the FBI.
You invade the President's house?
You don't allow his lawyers to photograph it because you're afraid of what they're going to show you doing?
You don't allow any of his lawyers to go along with you, even though very often that is done in a white-collar search so that the lawyer can give you help on where things are.
I mean, they had given them help up until then.
They had turned documents over to them.
You say that these are deep secrets?
You can't disclose the affidavit?
When you disclose it, most of it is crossed out?
And then you leak to the press?
What kind of unethical bum are you if you leak to the press?
I don't need to know much more about you than if you're an FBI agent.
Or Justice Department official.
You won't disclose it openly, but you'll leak to the press.
I also know you're lying if you do that.
I want to destroy you.
You're not just going after him, you're going after his son, his other son, his daughter, his close friends.
One night they served subpoenas to 50 of his closest people.
They took phones and Do you know they took my iCloud account the day back in 2019, just about the date that I first represented Donald Trump, and they gave up the iCloud the day after I represented him.
They had it for two and a half years.
And even though they had my iCloud, they came into my house and raided it.
And my law office.
Destruction of enemies.
You know how many lawyers lost their jobs working with us?
You have any idea of the financial damage that's done by these specious lawsuits?
They're trying to crush his friends so he has no allies.
And they exert the most effort for those that are the most effective for him.
And they don't want to dispute the truth or the common sense of what we say.
They want us ignored.
They want us put in prison.
They want all our property taken from us.
They don't want us to be allowed to be employed.
And they don't want any television station to put us on.
And they say so.
And the television stations comply.
That's not fascism.
That's destruction of enemies.
Personal destruction.
That's what the Democrats do.
This is a brief outline.
I want you to watch the campaign of 2022.
Projection of wrongdoing.
Creation of crimes framing innocent people.
Perpetration of big lies by just constantly repeating it and having 80% of the fascist media agree with you.
We now have the evidence of the Of the behind the scenes conversations between the Biden White House and the social media on things that should be cut out.
Which makes it state action that should now lead to a very big different result in that it was covered by the First Amendment and it was deprivation of First Amendment rights.
And then the worst part of all, which is destroying people.
I mean, I've had lawyers working with me that lost their jobs in law schools, law firms, Just merely for representing him.
No wrongdoing.
In fact, they were some of the best lawyers in the law firm, or some of the best professors in the law school, who had just recently gotten awards.
Watch it.
Watch it happening, and then say to yourself, this time, 2022 and 2024, There's only one way I can straighten this out.
There's only one.
What do I do about this?
You vote against them.
You vote against the Democrats at every level, every place.
You destroy them.
Not to destroy them for good.
Destroy the party so they have to rebuild and erase all that.
They never did this.
Well, maybe some of the things they accuse Nixon of, right?
The enemies part, right?
I don't remember Democrats doing this or Republicans doing this with maybe that exception.
Maybe Clinton did some of this.
But not this way.
Kennedys were pretty tough.
Nixon?
But like this?
No.
No, no, no, no.
We never came even close under any of those people being a fascist government.
We are now.
Present government.
I don't mean the United States.
I mean, the Biden administration is a fascist administration.
It does every one of these things and more.
It governs by mandate.
We go on and on.
You're the only ones who can change it, my friends.
And you can change it by the most powerful and most important thing that we have.
To control our lives and our destiny and our children's.
And that's the right to vote.
Exercise it.
Make certain others do.
Join us in the effort to make sure that everybody votes.
Join us in the effort to make sure that they don't cheat.
And join us, even you Democrats, join us.
Because you know what you can do for your party that's the best thing?
You can vote them out of office and take it over.
Because most of you are very good people.
I'm not Joe Biden.
I don't say that You know, the people that voted for Biden or the people who support him are extremists or dangerous or terrorists or like he said about us.
What a horrible thing to do to half the American people.
I think you're very good people.
I believe that you've been misled.
I believe you've been misled.
Very often in politics, there's misleading that goes on.
Democrat, Republican, I think it's got to the stage now where it's fascist.
I'm sorry, this did not happen in the past.
It's got to be done away with.
Doesn't belong in America.
Biden, you don't belong in America.
You don't.
You get up there and you condemn half your citizens?
Who just voted for the other guy?
You tell us we're systemically racist?
Translation, all of us are.
Systemic means almost all of us.
We're not systemically racist.
Want the truth?
You are!
You are!
You're the one who said you don't want to send your kids to the jungle.
You're the one who has a son that goes around saying the n-word.
How often?
Disgustingly often.
You're the one who said if you don't vote for you, you're not black.
You're the one who was pals with KKK leaders!
KKK killed people!
Black people!
It was you!
Not the average American.
And you say we're systemically racist?
You say our police are systemically racist?
You think that might be a reason why they're getting killed more now than ever before?
When you say they're systemically racist, they are not!
You are projection at the highest level.
Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.
Sorry if I got a little emotional at the end, but I believe the future of my country is at stake.
I'm not exaggerating that.
I'm not saying that emotionally.
I'm saying it very, very calmly, like the lawyer that I am.
I know the remedy for it, and I think there's only one.
That's the ballot box.
And I'm going to be doing everything I can to get you the information that's kept from you that I see is my role and the role of the people that I respect, the people who are doing it courageously, some of whom are being destroyed.
Thank you, and we'll be back in a few days.
▲
Export Selection