All Episodes
Previous Next
April 28, 2021 - Rudy Giuliani
47:28
WARNINGS From "1984" and "Brave New World" You Must Hear | Rudy Giuliani | Ep. 132
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hello everyone, this is Rudy Giuliani, and I'm back again with another edition of Rudy's Common Sense.
And I must say, this is one I'm looking forward to, because it's going to be a combination of literary analysis and where we are today.
And it's also going to be an analysis that demonstrates not only is sometimes fiction stranger than life, Sometimes fiction predicts life better than history, philosophy, political science, prognostication, commentariat, or just people sitting around their living rooms trying to guess what's going to happen.
Recently, over the last several weeks, there have been more than a few Discussions and comments, some brief, some in more depth, about the comparison between Orwell's 1984, George Orwell's novel, 1984, which was written, you know, before, about 1984, which was then in the future, and the present, drawing comparisons and distinctions between the two.
There have been some, there have been some Rather serious treatments of it on YouTube.
YouTube picked out five or six quotes from 1984.
Good quotes.
I mean, strong ones, long ones, in-depth ones that give you the sense of it.
And then went out on the street and demonstrated they've already taken place.
And Dave Rubin engaged in a discussion of it on the book club in some depth.
from a number of different angles, mostly finding comparisons with where we are today.
There were other discussions of it, shorter in nature, but still basically saying that 1984 and Orwell's dystopian novel seems to have pretty well predicted that the 2021 that we're in, or at least Where we're headed more than, I guess, where we're in.
Now, a dystopian novel, just in case that's not a word that's used very often, means a novel about the future, futuristic, imaginary, but very, very cruel, unjust world that someone is living in.
The two that I regard as the very best written Although there are some others that are very good would be, of course, George Orwell's 1984 and another one written several decades earlier by Algis Huxley called Brave New World.
They're different, similar and different.
They get to a similar result, which is a submissive people under the rule of a state with the state possessing the control Control over their rights, their lives, their income, their choices, their children, who in both cases actually don't belong to them any longer.
And then there are differences.
We'll go into that.
And I think it's interesting to bring Huxley into the discussion with Orwell, because both of them saw different aspects of what we're living through now.
And I think it will illustrate to you something that many of us are at pains to show you, which is things have gone very, very far.
Further than I think we're capable of really describing to you unless we do comparisons like this.
We are well along here in Biden's America.
We are well along to the road to socialism.
And we have, over the course of the last year and a half in particular, lost a lot of our rights.
And when you lose them, You got to get them back right away.
They can't remain lost for too long or they become permanently lost.
And I'll give you an example.
When we first went into the pandemic lockdown about a year ago, the I observed, although I agreed that it was probably necessary, I didn't know, didn't know really the facts about COVID and neither did the decision makers.
No fault of theirs.
I mean, they were operating on the best advice they had at the time.
And I saw that maybe it was necessary to have such a shutdown with all the mortality rates then and predicted and the Contradictory ways in which Fauci was describing it.
It seemed like it could attack us and all that.
First, you know, don't wear a mask, then wear a mask.
And yes, you can't get it if you touch something, but yes, you can.
And it was quite obvious they didn't know what they were talking about, particularly Fauci.
And they were making it up as they were going along.
Maybe making it up in too dictatorial a way.
More humility, more willingness to say, I really don't know.
But in any event, the world and the country was locked in.
Their rights were taken away.
Church services for Holy Week, nobody could go.
Services for the High Holy Days of the Jewish religion, nobody could go.
And it seemed to me that people went along with it very, very meekly.
And the churches and synagogues went along with it very, very meekly.
I said to my friends, or the few you could see in those days, it seems to me like they're going along like sheeps to the slaughter.
They probably have to do it, but it wouldn't be bad to do a little protesting along the way, to make the point that maybe we can salvage something out of this.
I mean, after all, if they're 20 feet apart, and they're wearing masks, and they forego communion, or they get it in a way that's completely sanitized, Or they forego being too close together at the Passover dinner or at the synagogue.
But no, none of that was tried or attempted.
And there was no real attempt made to see if we could salvage some of these businesses.
Although some businesses turned out to be winners and some businesses turned out to be complete losers.
And some of the rationale for that is going to have to be reexamined.
But in any event, as that moved along, And then, as we were coming out of it, some of the governors started to take on, I'll say, a dictatorial atmosphere, a feeling about it.
I mean, it's one thing to warn people about masks and things like that.
Another thing is to see them dragged away and to see them put in jail and to see threats of, if you don't— If you go out for frivolous things like going to a hairdresser, you might get arrested or get a fine, then the mayor of Chicago goes and does it, or the governor of California tells people they must wear a mask, there he's sitting there, tremendous crowd of people, very, very rich restaurant, having a social occasion or dinner, you know, watching all these hypocritical events, and then the harshness of the governors in New York and in Pennsylvania,
And in Michigan, and in particularly in Illinois, California, I think I said, you know, as you move towards socialism, immediately coming toward you is a sense of authoritarian power, because you've got to control all the masses.
You've given them lots of benefits, but you've got to make sure you keep them under control, and you keep them under your control.
You keep them under your political control, and you make them politically obedient to you, which is what the Democrat Party has done
over the years through the use of welfare, for example, or now by allowing illegal immigration in mass
scale or inviting it in mass scale.
So I began to feel like I was living in a different world.
And it was helpful to me a few months ago, which I did, to do a comparison with 1984
and to show that many of the things we saw in 1984 were happening.
You know, the big one was censorship.
We now have censorship.
We have censorship not so much by the government, but with a massive, strong group of institutions that are as powerful as the government, and in certain ways more powerful, and are allied very closely with this present government.
These are people who elected and donated hundreds of millions of dollars to have this present government in office of Joe Biden's.
They're his arm, his extension.
They have gone so far as to censor major damaging articles.
When the hard drive of Hunter Biden came out, which I can assure you contains Evidence of at least 30 or 40 major crimes.
American people aren't allowed to see that by virtue of the dictate of big tech, which makes them really an arm of the Democrat Party, an arm of Biden.
And the idea that they can operate in the theory is, oh, they're private.
They're working in coordination with the Democratic National Committee, the White House, Joe Biden.
That's why the White House Democratic Congress does nothing about them.
Their monopoly power is extraordinary.
It's beyond anything we've ever seen.
Their violations of restraint or trade are criminal.
But they're like Biden and Pelosi, and they're allowed to commit crimes that you or I would be in jail for for long periods of time.
So let's go back now to 1984 and Algis Huxley's Brave New World and much of what they wrote and predicted.
And many commentators say, really, it wasn't so much, particularly in the case of Orwell, it wasn't so much predicting as warning.
Warning what was happening to us and what would happen to us if we didn't become aware of how our rights were being eroded Both Orwell and Huxley were, of course, very well educated.
Huxley was actually a professor of Orwell's.
or the world order, the world authority running Brave New World.
Both Orwell and Huxley were, of course, very well educated.
Huxley was actually a professor of Orwell's.
They were brilliant men.
They had a deep understanding of Marxism and its offshoots.
Oh, gee.
Trotskyism, Leninism, Stalinism, Nazism.
Very, very close understanding of it.
Huxley as a professor and Orwell as a participant, as a soldier in the Spanish Civil War.
And they knew and observed the Marxist-Leninist clear plan for how to create a country under their dominion and how to turn it into a communist country.
So much of what they're writing is written with those guideposts in mind, the guideposts you have to reach so that you can totally take over the country.
And the frightening thing to me is as we go through both of these books, here are these men who had, particularly Orwell, who had a great fear of communism.
We've met and exceeded some of those guideposts.
We're going on the road to socialism and communism.
That isn't political rhetoric.
That is if you bother to take the time to read Engels and Marx and Lenin, read the history of Stalin, took a look at Hitler, now take a look at Mao, not Mao, but Mao's government and his success as Xi, and the ones in between.
We take a look at all of that and we're hitting those guideposts.
We're doing the things that prepare you To disintegrate your government, turn it over to a new government, and to cede a lot of it to the central government.
And the more you cede it to the central government, the more the central government begins to contract into one group, one cohesive group, and then one person.
We see that a little more in the states, but we also see that in what Congress is doing, trying to create a one-party country.
In trying to take away, on the one hand, the powers of the president, and on the other, the powers of the court, and destroy the court.
See if they can get it down to two branches of government, and one which they feel they can control through politics, and maybe through mental incapacity.
Orwell and Huxley are a combination of a lot of things.
They're fiction writers, philosophers, Deep thinkers, and in the case of Orwell, committed anti-communists, and in the case of Huxley, committed against authoritarian government and worried about it.
And they're accurate in their predictions and the things they fear happening in moving a democracy in a clear, A determined way toward first a form of complete disgust with the government that exists and the way of life that exists, and then the desire for a new one and the embracing of a socialist one that seems purely, purely fair, and where everybody would be the same, and then of course the human nature intruding and everybody doesn't become the same.
And people have to direct it, people have to run it, and the people who direct it and run it become the more powerful people, and then they become very wealthy, and then they become oligarchs, as we say today, and then one of them becomes the chief oligarch.
That's both history, if we ever taught that again to our children, and it's human nature, if we ever taught that to our children again.
This would be a good time for a short break.
I accomplished a lot in 2020 exposing the truth, establishing the relationship with you, working tirelessly for America.
And I came to know the work and value of the people at American Hartford Gold.
You see, you buy gold, not only for what you know, but you buy gold for what you don't know.
American Hartford Gold is the company you can trust when it comes to buying gold.
They sell physical gold and silver delivered right to your door or inside of your IRA.
In the precious metals industry, they are the highest rated firm in our country with an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau and thousands of satisfied clients.
Give them a call and tell them Rudy sent you.
And be sure to ask them what I bought.
And if you call them right now, they will give you up to $1,500 of free silver on your first order.
Folks, these are uncertain times.
The one thing you can count on to protect what you have worked so hard for is physical gold and silver.
So don't wait.
Call them now.
Call 833-GOLD-777.
That's 833-GOLD-777.
Or text RUDY to 65532.
Again, that's 833-GOLD-777.
Or text RUDY to 65532.
Thank you for returning to Common Sense.
or text Rudy to 65532. Again, that's 833-GOLD-777 or text Rudy to 65532.
Thank you for returning to Common Sense. So here's where 1984 and Brave New World really
are right on point.
To accomplish this, you have to break down the attachment of a person to their country.
I was brought up to love the United States of America from the first day I got into kindergarten until I got out of school, particularly grammar school, high school, and college.
Every day began with two things, the Pledge of Allegiance and a prayer.
Well, that builds into you by the time it's, you know, a number of decades later.
Whatever happens in your life, it's in your soul.
It's in your deep memory that you love your country and you love your religion.
You love God.
They're deep in us.
Hard to take it out of us.
Only way to do it is to get us to hate our country.
That's a communist program.
It's got to start with breaking the bond that exists between citizen and country, and this is exactly what happens in classic Marxist takeover theory, Saul Alinsky takeover theory, Patrice Collor's takeover theory, Has to be Soros takeover theory or you wouldn't create this chaos in all of these cities.
You wouldn't sit by and just say nothing about the burning of our flag.
You only burn the flag of a country you hate or it deserves hatred.
You only dishonor the national anthem against the wishes of men who have sacrificed arms and legs.
for their country under the aegis of that flag and that national anthem, who ask you,
please don't dishonor us. You only do that if you want to generate hate for this country or
have acquired it yourself. If you believe deeply in your heart that America is a systemically
racist country, that many more Americans are racist than not, have
As the president of the United States has proclaimed on numerous occasions, his vice president, numerous members of his party, and of course to uniformly puts them in complete alliance with Black Lives Matter and TIFA and the other radical groups who also believe that this country is an essentially racist country.
If you believe that, then that leads you to hate this country as it is today, or feel the moral obligation to overthrow it as it is today, because it's an evil country.
A country that's systemically racist is an evil country.
Racism is evil.
Biden has said it so often.
He either believes it or he wants us to believe that he believes it.
And worst of all, he's delivered it up as a card, a playing card leverage to our enemies.
You know, you never criticize the family outside the family for a reason.
So you can't be leveraged.
So you can't be divide and conquer.
These concepts are way beyond Joe.
They are.
And they're way beyond the Democrat Party because they get into the idea that they can't have quite everything they want.
It gets in the way, it's clouded by their greed for money and power.
So, we've seen years of flag burnings, dishonoring the national anthem, vicious destructions of statues, some of maybe people that are bad people and some that are really great people with some bad flaws, which probably represents all humanity, but Jesus Christ.
So I'm not going to mention them all, but we take down the statue of the man who discovered America.
Oh gosh, a flawed man, but hundreds of centuries ago and a man who made a great accomplishment.
He was the first one that really put on the map America, Columbia, the new world, Columbus.
We go further than that, though.
We dishonor the frowning father of this country, George Washington, as a slave owner and as a brutal, brutal soldier in the French and Indian War who should have been, I don't know, dismissed, done away with, or executed then because he was too cruel in the way he treated the French and the Indians.
We dishonor and destroy the reputation of Thomas Jefferson.
We tear down statues.
We point out everything about his life that we believe to be negative, particularly on a personal basis, his personal sexual life, which, about which there's, it seems to be fairly accurate historical fact, although you never can be sure about that.
One wonders if that were examined for all.
Heroes, even heroes of our antagonists, if anyone would pass the test that's now applied.
Certainly the revelations that we've seen come out over the last three or four years, as we've become more sensitive to that, makes one wonder if there's a real understanding and perspective of human nature.
But in any event, Jefferson did have slaves.
It is believed and fairly well proved that Jefferson had illegitimate children with one of the slaves who he was very close to and apparently in love with.
Okay, put that on one side.
On the other side, Jefferson Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence, which is the basis for liberty throughout the world.
It's a brilliant document without which many nations say they might never become free or much longer.
He was the architect of many of the brilliant ideas that underline, along with Madison and Hamilton.
And of course, Benjamin Franklin and John Jay, although he was in France at the time, they were negotiating.
Many of his letters to Madison are at the core of the Constitution that we put together.
He was our first Secretary of State and guided us through a perilous time when a war with England could have happened again.
And with his friendship with France, was able to help that get allayed.
He was involved in the first really contentious presidential election with Aaron Burr.
And then, of course, when he became president, there was a fear that as a person who didn't believe in a strong central government and believed that rights would only be preserved if they were kept by the states and not taken in by a strong central government, He did some of the more bold things any American president has done.
The Louisiana Purchase, you know, backing down pirates.
He actually was an activist strong president and a great man.
And then his correspondence with his former friend, then enemy, then friend,
John Adams over such a long period of time until they died on the same day in 1825 on the 4th of
July is a contribution enough to make both of them famous men, although they had already become
famous by the time they were doing it.
So you can't just condemn this man.
You condemn this man for that.
Not pay attention to anybody.
John Kennedy, a Democrat, sitting in, I believe, the cabinet room with his And he knew they also had a certain level of arrogance, as I did often when I ran the U.S.
put together, which was called the best and the brightest, some of the most intelligent people at the time he had
brought in, for which he was very much credited and should have been.
And he knew they also had a certain level of arrogance, as I did often when I ran the U.S.
Attorney's Office and put together what I thought was a very, very strong team in the mayor's office, stronger than
ever before.
They had a sense of arrogance, and I really appreciate this because I did this in my own less artful way at times.
They were all advising him on one thing, and they were all on one side, and the president was listening to them, and he was listening, and he was listening.
And he said, you know, this is the highest IQ level assembled in this room.
Since Thomas Jefferson sat here all along.
And they were stunned.
And they got it.
Coming from an intellectual himself, a writer, a man who studied politics, not just practiced it, that was quite a compliment and an accurate one.
Because then if we go into the realm of science and we go see his home at Monticello and we We see the pen that he invented and the architecture for the University of Virginia and Monticello itself, the concept of the University of Virginia, the laws and the rights that were created for the Commonwealth of Virginia, which became the basis in large part for our Constitution.
And we go back to when he was a young man of 27 and introduced a bill to free slavery in the House of Burgesses.
A man who struggled with it all his life.
The man who had guilt about it.
That alone distinguished him from the people of his day.
Didn't know the answer.
He didn't know the answer.
He didn't know the answer if people were ready, how it would happen.
Would they be taken advantage of?
Then we get to Lincoln.
Lincoln's gone.
Lincoln was too demeaning.
Lincoln was actually a racist because He expressed doubts about whether the African American or black slaves were ready for immediate emancipation and immediate freedom.
That maybe a phasing in period or some kind of program would be necessary to give them the skills which have been robbed from them for being in slavery for so long.
But on the other hand, He made the decision to fight the war to keep the Union together when a lesser man might have made peace.
He fought the war, and through tremendous losses and defeats and incompetent generals, he maintained the firm desire to win.
And he knew that he had to win it in order to make this country free.
And if we were going through this, this is the time to do it.
No more delay.
And he signed the Emancipation Proclamation risking, risking that he could have lost a war doing it because there were northern states, some of which were not comfortable with that, and there were border states he could have lost or turned.
This man put everything at stake to free the black man and woman.
And although it's many years ago and it should never have happened, A lot of white men shed their blood to save black men, along with black men who participated very bravely.
In that war, we lost more Americans than any other war, because we lost them on both sides.
end result, even though it wasn't perfect, never is, the end result is it ended and slavery was
legally abolished. So we can Canceled.
We can go on and on, right?
I mean, the United States grant and, of course, all the Confederate people and where, you know, you might want to preserve them to understand history.
So how does that fit into 1984 and Huxley?
I'll read you a quote that YouTube used, and it's a very fine documentary on this.
that might say to yourself, are we talking about today?
This is about 1984 at Oceana, which is the country in which, uh, the fictional country that was under the control of Big Brother.
Every record has been destroyed or falsified.
Every book rewritten.
Every picture has been repainted.
Every statue and street building has been renamed.
Every date has been altered.
Why do they do that?
They did it for the same reason I just described, what I described to you.
To destroy the citizens' love of the prior country, of its heroes and its history, of its traditions and its values.
But not just to destroy them, to make them hate them and hold it in repute So that it would be easier to allow them to embrace another form of economy and government, namely socialism and communism.
Oh, we've had records destroyed.
I don't have to list them for you.
Records falsified.
My goodness, statues and paintings and street buildings and street names Renamed or taken down?
We just listed a bunch of them and then really silly, silly ones, you know, Dr. Potter and Dr. Seuss and change Aunt Jemima, change the Washington Redskins.
I don't think there's any that... I don't know how Columbia University keeps its name.
Do you?
Who's it named for?
The country of Columbia?
Okay.
Who's the country of Columbia named for?
Christopher Columbus.
Columbia, when are you going to change your name?
Of course I don't want you to change your name.
What about Manhattan?
Manhattan's named after a Native American tribe, I don't know if this is fact or fiction, who seem to have been swindled out of New York Island by being paid only 24 pieces of gold or whatever amount by the Dutch.
But since it was the Dutch and then the English and now us, maybe, maybe, maybe we don't have to take on the liabilities of the Dutch.
Who knows?
But I mean, this would go on without end if you want.
But we are, I mean, we're headed on our way to what they predicted.
I'll give you a couple of the signs.
The massive spending without any consideration of who's going to pay for it.
This is, um, This is at the level of moving to the kind of irresponsibility of a Marxist-Communist financial system that then puts the pressure on
To redistribute the wealth in a very, very dramatic and big way.
So you have the trillions of dollars for the stimulus, another trillions of dollars for the stimulus.
You have trillions of dollars for infrastructure spending.
And when you examine it, it isn't about any of that.
It's about half paying off Democrat unions, donors, constituents, and setting up programs where you know they're going to make money.
This is the doublespeak that we talk about in, or that is talked about in Orwell.
It's when you say the opposite of what you know to be true, because it's a form of keeping the subordinate class subordinate.
The Biden tax increase will be the highest tax in the history of the country.
And we combine it with the Democrat states, not the Republican states, we go over into
50% territory.
In fact, we go up to 56 and 57% of what you earn in New York and in California, the two
states that are the furthest along to socialism.
There we're getting pretty close to the government confiscating your earnings.
Certainly, the government is the senior partner in your earnings.
For every $100 you earn, they get $57, you get $43.
You see, you're now working really at a lower rate than you're giving to them for all the wonderful things they do.
Now, if you agree with all the wonderful things they do and you're getting real value out of that, fine.
But New York is on its way to raising its taxes so it can be higher than California.
And California is already higher than New York, and there are about 10 other states that would have you in the—you are a junior partner in your wages.
You take home less tea.
Your family That, to me, is a big step forward on the way to socialism, and it has to be fought, and it has to be pointed out as a way forward to socialism.
You can see it maybe best if you illustrate what goes on in states controlled by Democrat governors who give signs of somewhat of a dictatorial complex about mass, about gatherings.
You know, in New York, churches weren't allowed to open, but strip clubs were.
Sort of shows no understanding of the First Amendment, doesn't it?
Everybody had to wear masks, but Black Lives Matter, when they rioted and protested
and were spitting at each other and everybody else with no masks on.
Everybody has to wear masks, but the people who are coming in illegally
at the border in the hundreds of thousands and ending up in American cities, also not tested,
and very hard to get them to wear masks.
We'll be back in a few minutes.
Your credit card company found suspicious charges on your card.
That's simple identity theft.
It's annoying, but they cover it.
The type of fraud you really need to worry about is home title theft, a devastating crime that takes you off your home's title.
and you're not covered by insurance or most identity theft programs.
That's why you need Home Title Lock.
Here's how easy it is for cybercriminals to get you.
The title documents to our homes are kept online.
The thief forges your signature on a quick claim deed stating you just sold your home and he's the new owner.
Then he borrows money using your home's equity and leaves you in debt.
You won't know until late payment or eviction notices arrive.
The instant Home Title Lock detects someone tampering with your home's title, they help shut it down.
Let's get you protected.
Go to HomeTitleLock.com and register your address to see if you're already a victim.
And enter Rudy for 30 free days of protection.
That's promo code Rudy at HomeTitleLock.com.
And now let's get back to our analysis.
So this can be illustrated best if we look at a combination of what happens where you have an administration in Washington headed towards socialism, an administration in New York headed towards socialism, and then the difference, an administration in Washington headed that way, but an administration in Florida headed in the direction of wanting to be firmly rooted in free enterprise.
So in Cuomo's New York, Cuomo just put together a budget of $212 billion for 19.5 million people.
And it's 19.5 million people and declining, by the way.
Governor DeSantis put together a budget for the same year for the state of Florida for $97 billion.
That's more than half lower than New York's budget.
Oh, but they must have less people.
No, no, no.
Let's see.
They have 20.5 million people. 19.5 million, 212 billion.
21.5 million, 97 billion.
Oh, Florida must be terrible.
People must be dying on the streets in Florida.
Well, let's talk about that in a second.
Florida at the end of 2021 is estimated to be 22.2 million people.
is estimated to be 22.2 million people.
They're looking at another 700,000 people to estimate they're coming to Florida
and they're going to pay the taxes that do exist in Florida.
Whereas New York estimates, it just depends on the estimate, New York estimates a decline in population for sure, it's declining every day, a decline either to 19.3 which is one and probably And probably the most optimistic Orwellian doublespeak.
Or, if you look at marcotrends.net, it predicts 18.8 down from 19.3.
So, New York is going to decline by approximately the amount that Florida is going to grow, and New York's budget is More than two times Florida's, and now let me tell you, being in the usual position of spending time and having an abode in both places, I don't see what I'm getting in New York for that extra money I'm paying.
The quality of services in Florida is as good.
And the quality of life, particularly with what Diplasia has done to New York, is significantly better.
So you're asking me to pay more money for declining services, fear, lack of safety, terrible schools, just not cleaning the streets, and it's just not going to happen.
That's why that's happening.
Can't you see the handwriting on the wall when you look at that?
Much more of Orwell's warnings of a march toward a communist dictatorship have or are happening.
I mean, throughout Oceania, the fictional nation in which the main protagonist, Winston Smith, an official of the Ministry of Truth, which is just the opposite of truth, is bombarded with signs and sayings and pictures, and then This.
Big Brother is watching you.
This is all over the place.
This is Big Brother.
He is the leader.
Doesn't say anything.
Kind of like, I guess, ours, right?
Doesn't say much.
Nobody really knows about Big Brother.
And I'll leave that for the book.
And can we go further than that?
Yeah, Orwell was predicting that communism would prevail because he was knowledgeable about the steps that they take, and he saw it even back in the 50s that that's where they were going, and he predicted it for the 80s, and now it's happening in the 20s.
Now it's happening in the 20s.
The analysis done by it on YouTube with five or six quotes of Orwell and how they've come true, I would strongly recommend to you.
The first one is from 1984.
The heresy of heresies was common sense.
the validity of experience, but the very existence of external reality was tacitly denied
by their philosophy. The heresy of heresies was common sense. That's why I've named
my podcast Common Sense, because that is what the socialists, the communists, the dictators,
the oligarchs, the totalitarians want to take away from you, because common sense would make
you argue against that and give your life to stop it.
I'm...
Algis Huxley's Brave New World, written earlier than 1931, is a dystopian novel which warns us of
a future of an all-encompassing world government, kind of like Soros' dream, which doesn't rely on
unpersoning, which is similar to canceling that they do in in 1985.
It doesn't rely on Big Brother watching you all the time.
It doesn't rely on fear, mostly.
Although it does have the same extensive invasion of privacy through technological surveillance, which is here.
But their society is managed by actually breeding your citizens outside the womb.
And you create them as twins, and they're in four or five different categories from those who are bred to be alphas who will run society, to those who are bred to just do menial tasks, and they are bred and conditioned to enjoy it, to be happy, in being oppressed, in being directed, in being controlled, in being told that you have to stay in when you don't have to stay in, in being told that you have to wear masks after you've been vaccinated,
By being told things that are totally contrary to science and logic and common sense, because the power that wants to take all power wants to assert that over you and show that it can do it.
The pandemic and the need to defeat Donald Trump at any cost, because he was the Big interruption to all of this has accelerated this, I think, much faster than it was going to happen.
But it is happening, and it's happening well in time for the announcement of Xi Jinping, the chairman of the Chinese Communist Party, in time for his bold prediction that he's going to be controlling the world, not the United States, by 2048.
And when you put this all together, and if you'd like, take a look at an article in the very excellent Epoch Times about Mao and how this very much fits into Mao's plan, and these things seem to be coming together really well with an administration that either doesn't know what it's doing or has people that are sympathetic to this socialist communist cause.
You know, throughout the years we've had a minority in our government that is sympathetic to socialism and communism as a better form of government, and also one that gets rid of God.
And many of these people have a real antipathy to God, as God can only be embraced by ignorant people.
That was Marx's idea, that it was part of the opiate of the proletariat, meaning it was a way in which They fooled us into being subjected to the capitalism.
There is a drug in Brave New World called Soma, or Soma, right, that is used to accomplish some of that.
So I really believe that if I don't have the time, nor would it be, I don't think, that much fun if I went through the whole thing with you.
But I really think you should read the two books, whether you've read them You know, in high school or college or never read them or read them two weeks ago.
I really think you should sit down with them now and go through them.
Kind of make a list for yourself of the parallels you see.
And here's what would be most interesting.
Let's make a list and alert the new ones that are going to come along that we didn't get to see.
I mean, the pandemic put this on fast track and made it clear where we're going.
Maybe before the pandemic, I might have still retained a few doubts.
I've got none now.
That's where they're going.
I'll leave you with the thought that if our parents and grandparents fought the horrors of Nazism and Fascism, all through that period of Nazism and Fascism, both before and after, just the Communists in China alone, have killed scores of people more than the Nazis.
No country has killed more of its own people than China.
They've been slaughtered, and we'll never be able to count them.
The young girls that were killed because they didn't want to have girl babies.
The three million Uyghurs that are in concentration camps.
We know Stalin.
Stalin was perfectly comfortable being Hitler's ally.
It was Hitler who threw him out because he was as vicious and as prolific a killer.
May very well have killed more than Hitler.
Most people think he did.
So this is a very, very determined movement.
It looks long term.
And for the first time in a long time, it's got a lot of optimism because it's got an administration in Washington that doesn't see it.
or analyzes it in a way where it sees benefits for the United States, as happens because the Chinese have really done a better job of infiltrating us than the Russians ever did.
So we'll be following this in much greater depth, but I just hope that maybe your own reading of fiction might help open your mind to what the censorship in this country is trying to keep from you.
Because the censorship is intense, and as about as effective as in a totalitarian government.
Yes, it comes from private enterprise, but the end result is the same.
You are deprived of the information you need, and you're only given the information they want to give you.
Well, thank you very much.
▲
Export Selection