All Episodes
Previous Next
July 17, 2020 - Rudy Giuliani
37:14
Biden/Obama Sellout To Iran | John Solomon and Rudy Giuliani | Ep. 54
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
It's our purpose to bring to bear the principle of common sense and rational discussion to the issues of our day.
America was created at a time of great turmoil, tremendous disagreements, anger, hatred.
There was a book written in 1776 that guided much of the discipline of thinking that brought us to the discovery of our freedoms, of our God-given freedoms.
It was Thomas Paine's Common Sense, written in 1776, one of the first American bestsellers in which Thomas Paine explained by rational principles the reason why these small colonies felt the necessity to separate from the powerful Kingdom of England and the King of England.
He explained their inherent desire for liberty, freedom, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and he explained it in ways that were understandable to the people, to all of the people.
A great deal of the reason for America's constant ability to self-improve is because we are able to reason, we're able to talk to each other, we're able to listen to each other, and we're able to analyze.
We are able to apply our God-given common sense.
So let's do it.
♪♪ Welcome to Rudy Giuliani's Common Sense.
And today we have a very special guest on a very special day.
John Solomon, you know, is an award-winning journalist.
Many, many awards and great breaking news all the time.
But John has a book out, which I think is out today for the first time.
So we're going to talk to him about the book and about a lot of other things.
John, welcome.
Mr. Mayor, it's so good to join you.
Thank you for having me today.
It is true, my new book is out with Seamus Bruner, my co-author.
The name is?
Called Fallout.
The nuclear bribes, Russian spies, and Washington lies that enriched the Clinton and Biden dynasties.
It's a mouthful, but it's quite a yarn, as you probably know.
So this includes, there's a piece of it that you have out today.
I do.
Can you tell us about that, and then we'll go into the rest of it.
Absolutely.
On justthenews.com, which is our website, we have an excerpt from the book today, and it tells one of the parts of the Russia scandal that a lot of people forget about or has been glossed over.
And that is, while the Obama administration, the Obama-Biden-Clinton team was giving away
the House to the Russians, giving them the uranium-1 assets under our ground, raw uranium
in the United States, billions upon billions of contracts of nuclear fuel that made American
utilities and their rate payers dependent on Vladimir Putin for their future nuclear
energy, the Russians were secretly helping Iran facilitate their illicit nuclear weapons
program.
And so the FBI had an undercover figure, a guy named Doug Campbell.
He was undercover in Rosatom for six or seven years, feeding the FBI daily information as
an informant.
And he's providing them all of this real-time information that Russia is assisting the nuclear
program and, hey, why is Barack Obama about to do a deal with Iran and Russia when they're
cheating?
The FBI could never get the attention of the president and get him to address this appropriately.
But we tell that story and, you know, really at the end of the day, fallout is a story of an Obama, Biden, Clinton foreign policy that appeased our enemies, gave away billions of dollars of gifts, whether it's Iran or Russia, China, and at the end of the day, gave away our security with nothing in return for benefit to the American public.
Wasn't the, wasn't that, there was that payment That was sent over by airplane.
It looked like a drug deal.
Yes, it did.
C-130s, as I recall.
That was right at the end, right?
When they were concluding.
It was.
And how much money was that?
It was in the billions.
We don't know the exact number.
It was in the billions in cash, right?
It was, and here's one of the great things that people don't remember.
Right after Iran got that money, you know what they did?
They went to Russia and bought a whole bunch of arms.
So Russia got rich on the Iran deal, Iran got rich on the Iran deal, and the American public got less secure.
So what was the purpose of making that?
It was money theoretically that we owed.
It was money that we had seized at the time of the revolution.
That's right.
And we decided to give it back to them.
We did, because Iran needed cash flow.
After all of those incredible tough sanctions that George W. Bush put in place and others, the Iran economy was crumbling, and it didn't have a way to buy weapons, fund terrorism, do the basic things it does for its people.
And so part of the appeasement, part of the inducement to sign the nuclear deal was we would give them some cash, and we did, a lot of it.
And why was it done in cash?
Because I don't think they wanted it to be detected originally.
Remember, there was originally denials that there was money going to Iran as part of the deal.
Eventually, we got the truth on that, but cash made it easily fungible for the Iranians to move it quickly, and that's what we did.
We didn't wire it.
We actually sent cash.
Do you think there had been other cash payments before that to them?
You know, that's something that I've always looked at.
I've not been able to find any evidence of it.
There's always been rumors of it.
But listen, no matter where you look at it, cash was moving around.
Cash is moving from the Russians to the Clinton Foundation.
Cash is moving to Bill Clinton's wallet with a $500,000 payment from Moscow.
John Podesta gets a major investment from a Russian in his clean energy company where he sits on the board.
Cash was moving all around.
Hunter Biden gets lots of cash out of Ukraine.
All of these events are interconnected.
What we really show and what the ultimate story of fallout is, is that we tried to answer the question why of all the things that Hillary Clinton could have done to attack Donald Trump, why did she pick Russia and Ukraine?
Why those two things?
And the answer is it was a cover-up.
It was to cover up One of the worst foreign policy failures in American history.
And the fact that while that policy was failing, all of these Biden, Clinton, Obama acolytes were cashing in, getting money.
So you had corruption and bad foreign policy.
And the only loser in this story is the American people.
The Uranium One deal, do you cover that as well?
We do.
We talk a lot about it.
That deal, I never understood why that wasn't investigated and prosecuted.
Well, in real time... Or any of this investigated and prosecuted, for that matter.
Yeah, you've been saying that for months, and you're right.
There's a blind eye to all of this.
We have one really big revelation on Uranium One, and that is, after we broke the story about Doug Campbell, that there was an informant back in 1718, and, you know, the Clinton-Obama-Biden machine started firing nuclear missiles at me, one of the storylines that Democrats and the media gave us was, all right, there was a criminal investigation, but we didn't know about it.
We had no reason to block the deal.
Well, we call bunk on that.
We were able to get a December 2017 email that was once classified, notifying Congress that in August of 2010, months before they approved Uranium One and a year before they started approving all those billions of nuclear fuel contracts for Vladimir Putin, the Obama Top echelons of government, the NRC, the Energy Department, the State Department, were all told, the company you're dealing with, Rosatom, they have one entity, RMZ, that's buying Uranium One, the other entity, Tenex, is engaged in bribery, in kickbacks, extortion, and money laundering, and despite that warning, despite the fact that they knew that that was a dirty company, and that they knew that the company was carrying out a mission by
Putin to make America dependent on Ukrainian fuel.
They gave away the house anyways.
Despite that warning, we debunked the Democratic storyline in this book.
Now, what is the what?
I've never understood the rationale for letting Russia get uranium one.
Why?
Why do we make a deal and give them material like that?
Well, it's a great question.
We try to answer it.
And I think it really comes down to when you go to 30,000 feet, there are two foreign policy approaches in America right now.
There's the one that came when you were in the Reagan administration and has continued today through President Trump, which is a peace through strength approach to foreign policy.
And then there is the Obama-Biden-Clinton approach, which is peace through appeasement.
If we give our enemies lots of gifts, they won't want to attack us.
And Vladimir Putin played him like a fiddle because he got everything he wanted.
He got uranium under the ground.
He got billions of dollars of contracts.
Hillary Clinton and the Obama State Department helped them build Skokovo, which is a Moscow version of our Silicon Valley.
And after he gets all that, he pulls the carpet out from under us and invades Ukraine.
And the Obama, Biden, Clinton people are sitting there going, oh my God, did we get taken to the farm?
And that's what they're trying to cover up in 16 when they hire Christopher Steele.
They're trying to neutralize Russia by putting Trump and the Republicans on defensive with false allegations.
I mean, that all of a sudden makes a great deal of sense when you think about how some of these policies seem to be completely unjustified and totally counterproductive.
Yeah, it really does.
There's a great moment.
There's one document my colleague Seamus Bruner found.
I'm so proud that he uncovered this document.
I did an interview in 2018.
I talked to a Clinton campaign official.
I think you and I may have talked about this one time or another, but they said, listen, that Christopher Steele didn't start out to give the information to the FBI.
It was just to make the Republicans wary of bringing up Russia during the election.
Then it spiraled out of control when he walks it into the FBI and it becomes a scandal.
But one of the things we found there's a poll from July of 2015 that was done internally by Hillary Clinton's campaign.
We have a copy of it.
It's up on the website.
It's embedded in the book.
You can see it.
And of all the scandals that Hillary Clinton endured in her life, Whitewater, the Rose Law Firm billing records, Vince Foster, the Asia Money Fundraising scandal, the email scandal that Jim Comey shuts down on July 5th, 2016, the thing more than anything else the polling data showed was her greatest liability, her greatest impediment to becoming president, was the Clinton cash story that Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton were cashing in while giving away all these gifts to Russia.
That is the poll that sets in motion Christopher Steele and all the events that became the fake scandals against President Trump.
This is an appropriate time to take a short break.
President Trump has a huge announcement for his top supporters.
We will be celebrating the 2020 Republican National Convention this summer and he wants you to enter for your chance to join him at the convention.
If you win, the team will cover the flight, the hotel, and it'll give you a VIP pass.
It'll give you VIP passes, actually, for yourself and a guest.
All you have to do is text Rudy to 88022 today for your chance to meet President Trump at the convention.
Again, that's me, R-U-D-Y, to 88022 to enter to win this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to be his special guest.
So, for that uranium decision, she was on CFIUS at the time, right?
Right.
They got a big contribution to the Clinton Foundation.
Right.
He received extraordinary speaking fees, didn't he?
$500,000 from a Moscow bank connected to the nuclear industry.
Right.
And the Clinton Foundation, do we know how much they got?
Well, they originally got commitments for, I think, $140 million.
Our reporting in the book shows that a lot of that ultimately didn't get delivered even.
They didn't even get the money.
uh... but they certainly gave away the farm anyways uh...
uh... john podesta her campaign chairman he sits on the board of a clean energy company now you know
russia's in the oil business they're not in the clean energy right all of a
sudden they invest in john podesta's company
tony podesta john's brother gets a lobbying contract and then joe biden has a very famous
uh... energy advisor his name is a most uh... hoxton yes you go back to fifteen when uh... the russia rebooted
failed in ukraine had been invaded with the creme invasion by russia you'll go
back and you see all these speeches and testimony before congress for a miss hoxton
says we can't let russia have an energy monopoly they use energy as a
geopolitical weapon we can't do it will guess what a miss hoxton was doing it all
six all seven oh eight no nine
he was helping ross a time the Russia nuclear energy company get a leg up in America,
get the uranium, get the nuclear fuel contracts, put American uranium mining workers out of
business and getting paid for it.
And then a few years later, without mentioning that history, he suddenly is outraged at Russia
and its geopolitical energy strategy. Great hypocrisy only could occur in Washington.
John, did you get any information on that very famous interchange between Obama and Medvedev
when he said, you know, once the election is over, I can be a lot easier on Vladimir.
Yeah, I can be a lot more flexible.
A lot more flexible with Vladimir?
I mean, that was one of the most extraordinary statements that was certainly a lot more improper and suggestive than anything involving Trump.
Oh, 100%.
I'm going to cave, after the election's over, I'll cave into Russia.
I mean, it's ridiculous.
What was that about?
One of the great moments about that open mic moment is that it's the ultimate sign of what an appeasement foreign policy, an appeasement national security policy is.
Hey, let me get through the election and I'll give away the farm.
And they did.
And that quote was really symbolic of what was really going on behind the scenes.
Energy extortion.
and it's a big deal.
It's obvious Biden got a lot of stuff.
What did Barack Obama get out of this?
Because what happened, once the Russians dumped all their cheap uranium into America, the
uranium industry in America, the mining industry in America, essentially went out of business.
We don't mine uranium.
If Vladimir Putin stopped shipping, we could have a crisis here.
And one of the people asked me the other day, well, I know Clinton got a lot of stuff.
It's obvious Biden got a lot of stuff.
What did Barack Obama get out of this?
And here is a great- Yeah, what did Barack Obama get?
Because obviously he tolerated all this.
And he had to know what was going on.
I mean, some of it was in the newspapers.
Well, and some of it was in his PDB as well.
Yeah, of course.
I would hope so.
He got an August 2010 briefing on everything that was going on with Rosatom and their criminality in the United States, and he still allowed the Uranium One deal and the nuclear deals to go together.
Well, we answer that question.
So if you go back earlier in Barack Obama's career when he's a senator for, United States
senator from Illinois, he was very close to the utility industry.
The big utilities in the country loved him.
They donated a lot to his 2008 campaign.
Well, one of the winners of the Russia uranium transaction is that American utilities, the
Edisons and all those big utilities that power our country, they got a cheaper form of fuel.
They got cheaper Russian uranium than they would get from the American workers.
So they were able to improve their bottom line.
And where did they go after they were done getting those contracts?
They dropped $10 million on Barack Obama's foundation in his library.
So he walks away with a handsome payout, just like all the other characters in our book.
Bye.
Let's go back to the Biden allegations, because I've got to ask you something that confounds people, which is, with all of these revelations, whether they're the ones involving Biden in Ukraine or the ones involving Hillary in Russia, why do none of them get investigated?
Great question.
Well— When much more tenuous allegations about other people are investigated as if it's the end of the world.
Well, as your good work for the president, as his private lawyer showed, and the reporting I did, and Sarah Carter, and many of the other great reporters that worked on this, Greg Jarrett, Sean Hannity, we saw a complicity between the Justice Department, the FBI, and the news media, right?
They were leaking to each other, and sometimes the FBI would take a leak that they knew came from them and use it as affirmation of their evidence.
It was circular reporting.
Well, that unholy alliance really plays out in the opposite direction.
When they don't want to investigate something, the media just turns away and doesn't cover it.
And that's really the story of Ukraine.
There is a willful, knowing blindness in the American media, and in the Justice Department, and in the Pompeo State Department, not to look at extremely credible, well-documented allegations.
But I have good news for you.
Please.
There's a senator from Wisconsin by the name of Ron Johnson, and he's been following your vapor trail into Ukraine.
He's got a large staff of investigators, and I believe in the next few weeks, certainly by the fall, Ron Johnson's going to issue a first report, and he's going to validate not only what you and I found, he's going to put a whole new set of allegations and evidence on the table that what went on in Ukraine was not only corrupt, it was bad for American national security.
Oh my goodness, yeah.
I mean, I have more than a few Ukrainian officials that I questioned, and then at the end of it, they would say, you can't imagine what this did for the reputation of your country.
Right.
Exactly.
I mean, here Biden is appointed as the point man.
And he is supposed to not only get money to them, but kind of fix Russia, which he fails to do.
He can't even get them weapons.
They're fighting Russia with slingshots rather than weapons.
And he is supposed to kind of control the corruption.
But of course, then he participates in it and makes a fool out of America.
Yeah, and I think we live together through the Russia scandal where day by day the most serious allegations went in reverse until they entirely disappeared.
Right.
I think you're already beginning to see that.
Remember where we started the Ukraine defense when people were attacking you and me and Chanel Rion and others?
Oh, the State Department had nothing to do with Burisma.
Well, guess what?
My FOIA lawsuits have found, thanks to the good help of the Southeastern Legal Foundation, the State Department was deeply involved with Burisma.
They had a USAID contract with them.
When the Burisma was trying to get out of the criminal investigations they were legitimately facing in Ukraine, where did they turn?
To the Obama State Department.
To the Biden State Department.
And we're pressuring them.
Help us make these corruption allegations go away.
And who was meeting with them?
George Kent, one of the famous impeachment witnesses.
Maria Vanovich, the ambassador.
The storyline that the Democrats gave us during impeachment is unraveling day by day.
And I expect Ron Johnson to blow an even bigger hole in the side of their ship in the next few weeks.
We'll be back with you momentarily.
When your life is in chaos, your home is your safe haven, your most valuable asset.
Imagine losing your home to some online scammer.
In an instant, you have no place to live and your home, your security, your nest egg in an emergency isn't yours anymore.
Is this even possible?
In a word, yes.
It's called home title theft.
And the FBI calls it one of the fastest growing crimes.
My friends at Home Title Log demonstrated how quickly and easily online scammers can steal our homes.
This is a legal title to a home in California.
All home titles, yours and mine, are vulnerable.
They're kept online, where thieves, foreign and domestic, hunt them.
They simply print your home's title, Forge your signature, stating you sold your home, put a fake notary seal on it, and refile it as the new owner.
In an instant, your home is theirs.
Then they can borrow against it, and you'd be responsible for the payments.
Or they could try to evict you.
I'm serious.
Your bank doesn't cover you, and neither does your homeowner's insurance.
Home Title Lock does.
For pennies a day, Home Title Lock puts a virtual firewall around your home's title.
If some cyber thief tampers with your home's title, they're on it, helping to shut it down before you lose your home.
Here's what I want you to do.
Go to HomeTitleLock.com and register your address to see if you're already a victim and don't know it.
You will receive 30 days of free Home Title Lock protection using the promo code Rudy.
You need to do this now.
Thank you for returning to our conversation with John Solomon.
Well, I mean, the amazing thing is that Burisma, there is absolutely no question, it was a completely crooked company just by the mere fact that it was formed while Zlochevsky was a minister of government.
Yeah.
And he gave himself all of the lucrative licenses.
Exactly.
And that's the company that hires Hunter Biden.
the Secretary of Defense had a private company and he gave them all of the
Yep.
contracts to build airplanes and then left and took the benefit of it.
And that's the company that hires Hunter Biden.
That's the company that hired Hunter Biden and paid him all that money for
nothing.
Yeah.
Well, nothing to get Joe's influence.
That's what it was.
It was a protection program.
It was like the old mob money that went on the street to protect the shopkeeper who didn't want to be harassed.
You just kept paying as long as they paid Hunter Biden.
And you see it in the documents we just got in the FOIA lawsuit, Mr. Mayor.
You see this line where, hey, the Burisma people and Blue Star want to come meet with the undersecretary of the State Department.
And, oh, you better meet with them because Hunter Biden's on the board.
It was the ultimate calling card and the ultimate protection card.
And yet the American media, the Congress, the State Department, even Mike Pompeo's State Department, they've turned a blind eye to what is a legitimate, honest scandal.
Yeah.
I mean, and actually people should know that you began working on it two and a half years, at least, before Biden was going to run for president, and I started working on it two years before.
That's right.
Completely for another reason, to defend the president.
Right.
And had no idea Biden was involved.
None.
And he was handed to us by the Ukrainians.
Absolutely.
And by the evidence sitting in the American public record.
And the Ukrainians tried very hard to get the information to the Justice Department.
They did.
They did.
You made that very clear in columns way back then and recently.
Recently, yes.
The former U.S.
Attorney in Little Rock, Bud Cummins, reached out to Jeff Berman, the man who just got fired as the U.S.
Attorney in New York, and they turned a deaf ear.
And you see time and again this dual system of justice.
Tenuous allegations against the president get investigated.
Serious allegations against Obama, Biden, Clinton get deep-sixed.
And I think the ultimate day that will live in infamy for this period is July 5th, 2016, Mr. Mayor, because that's the day that James Comey walks out onto the stage and says, even though he didn't have the authority to do so, I'm not going to charge Hillary Clinton for all of the bad conduct she had on uh... their classified email system
she she broke security rules but you know what we're not going to charge are not that same day
the same day they give a pass to hillary clinton christopher steel walks into the london fbi and says
here's my dossier because of last week because of the litigation in britain what did we learn he told the fbi
on day one we drops off the dossier the first time my ultimate client
is hillary clinton the one you just exonerated a few years months hours ago
in washington That day is the ultimate symbol of the dual justice system that we've created in America the last four or five years.
Well, as you know, I hired Jim Comey years ago.
Right?
He was a fine assistant U.S.
attorney.
I began to become somewhat suspicious of him when he pulled that routine with Ashcroft.
Right.
It seemed to me it was done more for publicity than—but he made himself into like a saint with the Washington media.
He did.
That's right.
But I never thought he was as, whatever he is, dishonest or—until he put out that report.
Right.
Because when he did it, He gave all the facts that would make an incredibly strong case of obstruction of justice.
He gave all the evidence of intent.
Destroying 33,000 emails, destroying telephones, bleaching the server.
These are the things you use to prove intent.
He knows that.
He prosecuted cases under me.
And then he makes the ridiculous statement that no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case.
And every prosecutor is looking at him saying, bring this case?
I would salivate for a case like that.
Exactly.
She's so obviously guilty.
I think he got into a lot of trouble for that.
And I think some of the Trump pursuit was to make up for that.
Yeah, I think that makes a lot of sense.
Without realizing it, trying to play both sides against the middle, although he didn't indict her, he did tremendous damage to her.
He did.
I mean, he laid out facts that Trump was able to hammer home very, very dramatically.
I mean, I gave the speech at the Republican convention, and the minute I mentioned her name, This was a month after.
Lock her up.
Lock her up.
Right.
Then you say 33,000 emails and they go crazy.
Whoever heard of someone destroying 33,000 emails and not getting prosecuted?
It's insane.
Yep.
And remember, they were under subpoena.
It's just remarkable.
I talk about in the final chapter of this book with my good colleague Seamus Bruner that when I look back at 2009 to 2019, I call it the decade of deceit.
It's the first time in our history where institutions that we came to rely on that they were above politics, they would
stick to the facts, they didn't have an agenda, suddenly showed their hands politically.
And that's the FBI, the Justice Department, the CIA, and the news media.
Yeah, I know Republicans have always had a beef with the news media, but the news media
the last six, seven years are far more corrupt, far more deceitful.
I agree completely.
I mean, I thought back when I ran for president and even when I was mayor that they were pretty
tough and pretty difficult.
It was like a dream compared to now.
Even the people who pursued you, you could sometimes turn around.
They're open.
That's it.
you could explain it to them. Right. And it was more of a game and their job than consume with
Yeah.
this hatred. That's it. There's a hatred now that kind of wipes out rationality. Yeah. And I think
there's also this Trump is so bad we can do anything to get him out. Right. Even hurt our
country tremendously. Yep.
You see it every day in the words that are being uttered on Twitter by journalists.
They've abandoned all sense of neutrality, and it's bad for the country, as it is that our FBI and DOJ became politically poisoned, our State Department.
They were above politics for a long time, but this episode, this sorry decade, really showed us that they have become politically infiltrated and bad for the future of America, unless we hold people accountable and reverse it.
So how much of that is being fixed?
None of it yet.
None of it.
Very little.
I mean, I definitely am seeing evidence that John Durham is running a criminal investigation, and I think we will see some activity, but really, most people have gotten a pass.
Sure, a few people got fired, a couple people got a slap on the hands, but we write in the book that the grave danger is if we do not punish and make this behavior So painful that you won't try it again, that this will become the norm in America.
We'll be a banana republic.
The FBI will be weaponized to go after whatever enemy we did.
What went on in Russia and Ukraine was worse than anything the Nixon enemies list ever envisioned doing back in the 70s.
So, just to conclude it, I'll pick the easiest one of all.
I can't imagine as a prosecutor and a U.S.
attorney, if I had a case like Comey's submission of the Pfizer Affidavits to the court, given all the other evidence surrounding it, that I wouldn't prosecute him for making a false statement—perjury.
Right.
In all likelihood, they're not going to prosecute him.
Maybe they will, but probably not.
What is that?
It's a fear of being attacked by the media?
I mean, they're lawyers.
They can see the evidence as clearly as I can see it.
That's right.
He has a heading on the top that says verified.
Right.
He gives the information.
He doesn't indicate that it's not verified.
He knows it because a few months later he tells the President it's not verified.
Right.
So we know that he knows it.
That's right.
So that's a false statement.
It is.
And a very material one that led to the massive invasion of privacy and an investigation of first the candidate, then the President-elect, and the President of the United States.
And it's based on a lie.
So what's—you know Washington really well.
What stops the Trump Justice Department from bringing that case?
Well, first, there's a mentality of the Department of Justice.
About a year ago, I wrote a story about dozens of examples where FBI and DEA and ATF officials were found to have committed really gross violations.
An FBI lawyer- I remember that.
Stole from the commissary at Quantico that we supply our Marines with.
I mean, what more awful conduct can you have?
And they didn't get prosecuted.
Time and again.
Comey doesn't get prosecuted for lying.
McCabe doesn't get prosecuted for lying.
Comey doesn't get prosecuted for leaking his memos.
I do believe right now I am seeing activity consistent with building a case of conspiracy to defraud the United States in the FISA court.
Now whether they will get there and whether they will reverse this Department of Justice where everybody gets off and the Justice Department gets prosecuted everywhere else remains to be seen.
But there's a lot of activity, witness interviews, evidence gathering, plea deal discussions that give me reason to believe that by Labor Day or around Labor Day we might see some fruits of the John Durham investigation.
But if we don't, We are on a high-speed hypersonic jet to a banana Republican America.
And how do you see, you believe that Durham, and I have every reason to believe the same thing, is going to give a straight report with straight recommendations?
I do.
I think it'll probably start with, I think the first sign may be a criminal information, a plea deal that tells the larger story of what his investigation found.
I think right now he'd like to tell the story in court where he's most comfortable.
He's not a political writer.
He's not going to do a Mueller report.
But I would be looking for that period just before, just after Labor Day for some life and activity and maybe the first news to come out of Durham.
He deserves a lot of credit.
This man has not leaked one iota.
Imagine that compared to James McCombie.
Andrew McCabe, what a breath of fresh air.
Now, what about the Attorney General?
So he's made some statements that sound like he's preparing us for there may not be indictments.
Yeah, I don't believe that yet.
I don't believe that.
I still think... But he has made those statements.
What you're saying is that that's a strategy, possibly?
It could be.
I mean, he said, the most declarative thing he said is, I would expect by the end of summer to see the first Real activity public in the Durham investigation.
I haven't seen anything that makes me doubt the Attorney General and let me say this Attorney General Barr has taken this seriously unlike the predecessors he had and Rod Rosenstein and Jeff Sessions and he's run it to ground and we got three special prosecutors over a hundred investigators and lawyers working on it.
We're going to get the truth at some point very soon.
And are they ever going to investigate Biden?
Or is he going to get to keep the millions from the Ukraine, the millions from China, and then the money that his brother made in Iraq?
The whole family became millionaires.
Yeah, I think Ron Johnson is where it ends.
I think we'll have to watch for the Ron Johnson report and hope we get the truth there.
At least some political accountability.
I don't expect any criminal... Of course, by the time they do it, he'll probably be unprosecutable for not being able to participate in his own defense.
Yeah, that's right.
And also, the statute of limitations are passing.
Yeah, I mean, he's babbling like... Right.
Gosh almighty.
Well, thank you, sir.
Tell us the name of the book again.
Fallout.
It's nuclear bribes, Russian spies, and Washington lies.
It sounds terrific.
You can get it on Amazon and every place else right now?
Absolutely.
Amazon, Barnes & Noble, at the JTN Shop, which is associated with Just the News.
Thank you for giving it the attention today, Mr. Mayor.
No, no.
I appreciate it.
Looking forward to reading it tonight.
Thank you, sir.
Thank you, John.
Good luck.
Good to talk to you.
Thank you, Mayor.
Well, I think that was a very interesting interview with John.
John is a repository of information about the scandals and the corruption of the Obama administration, unlike anyone else.
And I think this book will be one of several that he writes, and by the time he's finished, I think you're going to see that the Obama administration was probably the most corrupt administration in our history, this whole sellout of America to Russia.
is just matched by the sellout of America to China, which Biden did when he was supposed to be negotiating with China in order to get them to back off the islands that threatened Japan and South Korea, when he was supposed to get them to lower their totally confiscatory tariffs, when he was supposed to help Those are all the missions he was given as the point man—point man—for Obama.
He failed in every single one.
Every single one of them got worse.
And is it connected to the fact that his son got into a $1.5 billion deal?
With really the government of China, because the Bank of China is part of the government of China, and you didn't know it.
You, the American people, didn't know your vice president was compromised, did you?
And it was hidden.
And they still continue to hide it, and they continue to answer no questions about it.
And the horribly corrupt press doesn't even ask them a question about it.
There's something very, very wrong, and the corruption here is not just in government, it's with the press.
Because we count on the press to keep our public officials honest.
And when they learned that they can get away with this the way Biden did for a whole lifetime and the way Hillary and Bill Clinton did for a whole lifetime, they start stealing a lot of money, and they stole a lot of money.
The Bidens, from the time he was in the Senate, were selling his office and pocketing the money and becoming millionaires, and Joe obviously knew all about it.
After the first or second, he had to know about it.
It was right in front of his face.
I mean, in case—unless he was senile, you know, back then.
And he was just stupid back then, not just denial.
It was quite obvious that Hillary was stealing.
It was quite obvious that Biden was stealing.
It was in the newspapers that his son had this compromising job, and he did nothing about it.
So I think the really interesting thing that hasn't been explored yet and that should be explored is, What did Obama know, and when did he know it, and what did he get out of it?
Remember, he did come from Chicago, and he did have that very interesting transaction with the loan of the House, never covered properly, because Obama is a prince beyond scrutiny.
And if that doesn't end, as John pointed out, we just can't have a fair criminal justice system in this country.
There should not be different standards for Republicans and Democrats.
Donald Trump has been hounded since the day he got into office.
And Obama was allowed to have an administration that carried out some of the biggest scams and scandals in American history that have all been covered up.
And with our enemies, Russia and China.
That's disgraceful.
And until it ends, we're going to have a very divided country.
So let's hope it ends quickly.
Well, thank you very much for watching.
I think you're going to enjoy John's book.
I highly recommend it, Fallout.
I can tell you one thing.
This man is very careful to make certain that everything he writes is truthful, because I've watched him with things that we had, and I thought they were truthful.
I thought they were backed up, and he waited for more and more backup.
So, number one, you're going to get a good story, and number two, you're going to get an accurate one.
And boy, that's hard to get out of the swamp nowadays, right?
▲
Export Selection