All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 24, 2019 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
45:00
20190124_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-wookle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon Oh, then tell me, Sean O'Farrell, where the gathering is to be In the old spot by the
river, right well known to you and me One word more for signal, token, whistle of the marching tune For your pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
The date is Thursday, January 24th, 2019.
I'm Andy Donner, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Radio Free Northwest
This week, ladies and gentlemen, I personally don't have anything all that long for you, but the short item I am going to cover is very important.
All of you are familiar with Gretchen the Librarian's work, and many of you will have noticed that some of her recent book reviews, as well as several others we have in the hopper ready to be played on Radio Free Northwest, are of books from, among other places, countercurrents.
Obviously, they're not our favorite people, and some of the things they promote and encourage are subversive and seditious to the point where we simply can't have that material on the program, even if it is just in the form of a book review.
Now, by the by, a book review is just that, a book review.
It should not be taken as any sort of endorsement.
Or encouragement for you to necessarily read that book if you aren't otherwise so inclined.
And quite frankly, being not inclined to read countercurrents books might be a good thing.
Still others of these books are of a genre you might call intellectual racism.
And I'm bringing all this up because recently I received an email where a longtime party contact who lives in the homeland asked me to vindicate his stance over a disagreement he had with Harold some time ago.
I'm not going to do that, but I will take his request seriously because it does deserve some examination.
My real reason for bringing all this up is that the party very frequently has reasons we aren't going to discuss in public or even with most people in private for doing certain things and not doing others.
The major reason this causes so much friction among people of all sorts in white nationalism is that deep down inside, a lot of us are really just looking for some sort of validation.
This is a completely understandable and human motivation.
But, again, white nationalism should be about you putting something into it rather than you getting something out of it.
I am saying all of these things with a certain amount of empathy because white men especially and decent white women are very frequently treated awfully by society around them and very much have an axe to grind with, well, society in general.
As a result of that, they feel neglected, mistreated, not taken seriously, and they have a really hard time dealing with that same sort of perceived rejection among their fellow white nationalists.
Look, I get it.
I really do.
But as I've said, we have reasons for doing things and not doing things that may not always be made clear.
Here's an example.
The party has always been raked over the coals for not having a cryptocurrency wallet or a collection of different cryptocurrency wallets people could donate to as they see fit.
Again, I understand why, but think about this.
Is it at all possible that the party has discussed that with a whole bunch of really smart people and come to the conclusion that we should absolutely avoid that until certain things change?
Well, it is possible.
In fact, that's what happened.
I understand that everybody making the suggestion to us is trying to help, but when we politely decline, they take it personally, even though they weren't at all interested in hearing why we might not want to.
Even when someone has made an especially good case, some of us will follow up with questions that are sloughed off in the way others feel we sloughed them off, and I think you know what I mean with this one, so I'll cut it short.
I'm sure many of you will remember that back when Matt Heimbach's political organization was still operative, Their PayPal account was shut down, and it was forcibly reinstated as a matter of law because his organization was registered as a political party.
As soon as that happened and became a news item, Harold Covington and several others of us were again raked over the coals for not registering the Northwest Front as a political party.
It turns out there's something most of you don't know about that.
Political parties are legally required to turn over names and addresses of all their donors.
Many of you won't be familiar with the red lines of acceptable white nationalist behavior, but it just so happens that disclosing other white nationalist identities to the public at large, and the racial enemy in particular, is against those red lines.
Now this next example I'm going to bring up is actually very, very serious.
Many years back, not too long after I myself came home, towards the end of 2011, one of the party associates that lived...
Well, I'm actually not going to say where, since that might help disclose who I'm talking about.
Anyway, this guy, through no fault of his own, ended up in a compromised position in the middle of an FBI investigation through something someone related to him did.
Now, as it so happened, this comrade possessed the integrity required to, in no uncertain terms, make that plane to party headquarters.
That in and of itself was a massive sort of risk that very few of us will ever take.
Harold did what he could.
to manage the situation, but very, very quietly, since if he were to broadcast the fact that he knew about this, said comrade's position would be made even worse, again, by no fault of his own, and that's doubly tragic when you think about it because he himself didn't even do anything wrong such that he ended up in this position.
Unfortunately, several of the other party comrades around him, even after we tried to very, very discreetly keep him away from everyone else, with his cooperation, I might add, Became incredibly upset with Harold for not having blasted from the rooftops what was going on.
Of course, none of them stopped to think that there might actually be a reason Harold was doing what he was doing.
And just because I haven't said so in this particular episode of Radio Free Northwest so far, I actually very much dislike Cloak and Dagger, Secret Squirrel, and all that other stuff.
Most of the time, the party is actually pretty straight up with its message.
And I say that because there are always a few fans, and they are genuine fans of the program, that parse every single word for some sort of hidden meaning to everything we do, and it's just not there, I promise you.
No matter how hard we try to make ourselves plain and easily understood, it doesn't always work out.
About a year after I came home, Harold had taken to running a number of poster and flyer design contests to see what people were thinking and what their level of understanding was at the time he would open one of these up.
We would always get a number of incredibly strange entries that, one, didn't even contain the name Northwest Front or anything racial or a website or P.O. box address.
One thing he and I always told people is that if you're going to design a piece of literature like that, it needs to be clear from the get-go that it is, in fact, racist literature.
Someone who'd been listening to the program for a few months approached Harold Covington after I told them exactly that, and made it plain that he thought Harold should get out of this organization if it was racist and start something else, because I, urging them to produce genuinely racist material, had outright offended them.
Now, how this person listened to Radio Free Northwest and even got a party introductory packet, I don't understand.
How does this person miss the point?
But it happens.
And that is, again, why we try to be so plain and forthright with our actual meaning.
There are times where the party will not be as plain as you might like and we might simply ask you to do something or not to do something or to avoid a particular person or a particular idea just because we happen to know some things you don't and we happen to have dealt with those things before.
I understand that that can be confusing at times, but there are subjects that we simply cannot discuss in public, and you might be surprised to know all sorts of things we're aware of behind the scenes about all sorts of white nationalist personalities.
True, most of it is simply not a big deal, but at times we really do encourage people to simply skip out on certain trends in the movement.
And just so I'm exceedingly clear, that does not mean we think badly of people that have interests in those things provided they're not outright unhealthy.
It's just, again, at times, we can't give you the validation you're looking for because we don't actually agree with what's going on, even if we're not going to explain why.
Now, with respect to all the people who need that validation, hey, I understand I was there too.
One of the most important skills, especially in this unhealthy society, and this goes doubly for men and boys of teenage years, is to learn to self-validate.
That's probably the best thing I can tell you to do in these cases.
Greetings, everyone.
Comrade Jason here taking on most of RFN this week.
I hope you are all well.
It is the established practice for the party that we not use RFN as a regular forum for addressing current events or controversies, because those are always covered so well in countless other shows both in and out of the movement.
With RFN, we want a focus on the long game, the long-term picture, and to elucidate timeless truths that will be just as relevant to our people listening to old RFNs 30 years from now as they are today.
But all rules are made to be broken, and right now we do have a very illustrative current event, which we should really talk about this time.
The actions by our enemies that this event occasioned have been so egregious and obviously anti-white that it cannot have failed to have opened the eyes of many of our racially asleep white brothers and sisters all across America, and perhaps also overseas.
They show that outright anti-white hostility and aggression are now entirely commonplace and widely tolerated in the most powerful institutions of American media in our society.
Last week, on Friday, the 18th of January, three groups demonstrating at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. came into conflict.
The first was a group of black Hebrew Israelites, whatever the hell those are.
The second was a group of American Indians putting on what they called the Indigenous People's March.
And the third was a group of almost entirely white students from a private all-boys school, a school that is most wonderfully named from the Northwest Front's perspective, Covington Catholic High School in Park Hills, Kentucky.
The students and school were there as part of the National March for Life anti-abortion rally.
A highly edited and prejudicial cut of a video of the confrontation was posted to Twitter soon after the incident and went viral, blowing up all across American media.
The account which posted the deceptively edited video is not the account of an individual.
Analyses by several commentators have shown that it has an unnaturally great frequency of postings with markers and characteristics that indicate it is run by a team of people for the sole purpose of creating politically charged fodder of a leftist variety, of course, and injecting it into the mainstream to provoke exactly the kind of widespread political and social reaction that it succeeded in doing this time.
This video cut showed an elderly Omaha Indian man beating his TomTom, literally his TomTom, not figuratively, I can't stress that enough, beating his TomTom drum only inches from the face of a smiling young man in a red MAGA hat, which, for you listeners to this program from 20 years hence, is the official 2016 campaign hat of President Donald Trump, standing for his campaign slogan, Make America Great Again.
The Indian in the video went to the press after the incident saying that the young white man had blocked his way and that the other white students had surrounded the Indians and had begun chanting aggressively at them and posturing to intimidate them.
Of course, in the modern society that we have, whenever there's a confrontation between whites and non-whites, it is the hostile and coddled non-whites who are almost always the aggressors.
But the liberal media bought this Indian's lie immediately and ran with it because it fits their narrative of non-white victims and white oppressors.
This initial false story was followed by days of intense and breathless leftist media stories about the arrogant white boys trying to intimidate the poor little Native Americans, the central figure of which was the young man with what was characterized as a giant smirk on his face, shining his entitled white privileged mentality to all the world.
The students in the video were doxed online and their families began to receive death threats.
Journalists and celebrities tweeted online of their desire to do violence to the students and the school, remarking about the punchability of the young man's face.
Others online posted that the boys and all whites like them should actually be murdered and the school burned to the ground.
The press talked incessantly about white privilege, non-white victimhood, and oppression.
And have tried to make this young man the symbol of everything they hate about America and about the overwhelming white support in the country for the president.
So-called conservative voices all across the spectrum capitulated immediately.
Republican politicians in D.C., conservative media, and religious figures all rushed to condemn the school and the boys.
Everybody bought the script.
Evil white privilege versus innocent non-white victims of classic American white oppression.
Not one source for nearly two full days even spoke up about the need to wait for more evidence to come in, or to hear what the boys themselves had to say, to withhold judgment until perhaps more extensive video footage could be found for confirmation.
From the very beginning, it was a firestorm of condemnation from all quarters.
And then, suddenly, as so many of these convenient narratives that the left loved so much, it was all exposed as a giant lie.
More extensive videos surfaced that showed the true story, and it turned out that it was the Covington students who had been subjected to harassment first by the black Hebrew Israelites, who had also been caught on video harassing some white women even earlier.
In response to this hostility from the blacks, the boys had begun to chant school fight songs, keeping up their camaraderie in the face of this non-white aggression.
Then they were targeted by the Indians, and the Omaha Indian elder, Led his group up to the boys and singled out the young man whose life he was to try to later ruin through his lies to the press.
This saga is ongoing and shows little sign of letting up.
What is most amazing, however, is that amid many retractions and backpedaling this week, after the truth came out, some leftists, both in and out of mainstream media and not a small number of them, are doubling down on the narrative and basically ignoring the fact that the entire thing has been exposed as a giant fraud.
This is basically irrational.
The venom and hatred and violent rhetoric being poured over whites in general and these young men in particular is astounding to many people.
But to us of the front who know what is ultimately at stake, the racial control of the greatest nation on earth and the very future of life in our lands, it is actually not all that surprising.
Combat was joined against us long ago and it was only the white people of America who didn't fully comprehend it.
Good analysis pieces of what has happened this week have started to come out.
Few of them fully comprehend the true nature of the rage that has been on display.
Few really understand what has happened here, and why this particular event so quickly went off the rails, became so venomous and volatile, and why the facts, even now, still don't seem to matter the way that they should.
However, I have one analysis piece that does have it exactly correct, and I want to share it with you.
It is from the YouTube channel Black Pilled.
This week we've seen in the news the rage and contempt that the left has for white men that don't do what they're told.
White men who don't obey their carefully crafted orders.
White men that don't cower in fear when confronted.
Allow me to explain their behavior for you.
Even those who are familiar with how irrational the left is at its core, who are stunned or taken aback by the insanity That was unleashed by a quiet smile.
Why would a smile threaten them as intensely as it has?
Did they detect some kind of evil in that smile that you don't see?
Did they imagine something nefarious in those eyes?
If this is what you think, you've got it backwards.
It's not what they see in this face that scares them.
It's what they don't see.
They don't see shame.
They don't see obedience.
And when you've been successfully engineering a people to respond to your desires by controlling them with shame and guilt, the absence of that mechanism is terrifying.
It's no different than if you've been systematically breaking a chained, wild animal by cruelly torturing it just out of reach.
Of its chain, inflicting more and more pain until you condition it to whimper and fear simply by raising your hand.
That is what the left has done to certainly all the white men in their lives, and with much success to the mainstream establishment right.
They've been very successful in their war against white masculinity.
After all, let's not lie about what toxic masculinity really means.
It most certainly means white masculinity.
It really doesn't take much to see this when their campaigns to feminize boys are clearly targeted at one demographic, and you never hear a peep about the evils of masculine people of color.
Quite the contrary, it's celebrated.
Because that's not their target.
Their target, the chained animal that's been beaten so regularly and so badly that the response that the left expects, or rather demands from their victim, is complete.
Pavlovian submission.
It's not that the left detected a hint of aggression in this boy's face.
Had that been the case, the response would have been much more than threats of violence.
No.
What inspired so much fear was the absence of submission.
At first, they didn't quite understand.
And this enraged the left.
How dare he look them in the eye instead of staring at the ground, quaking with fear?
Didn't he understand the pain they would soon unleash upon him?
So the left, with their whip in their hand, raised their arm, ready to strike the chained-abused animal, and then that's when it happened.
In a moment of panic, they realized the real reason he was smiling.
He was smiling because his chain had broken.
For Blackpill, I'm Devin Stack.
Devin Stack is the author of The Day of the Rope, a fictional novel about a near-future America filled with right-wing violence against the powers that have turned America into an unlivable and unrecognizable tyranny.
Now, where have we come across that idea before?
I don't know much about the book, or its quality, but it may be of interest to some of you.
The thing that is most important here is that his analysis is exactly right.
The scariest thing in the world to the anti-white establishment is a white man who cannot, will not, be cowed and made to bend the knee.
Unfortunately, the young man at the center of this whirlwind recently did an interview in which he said that he now wishes he had just walked away.
This is just what our enemies want.
That their abuse and threats make us turn and hide our faces, rather than standing in the face of the social pressure and hostility directed against us.
Hopefully this young man will come across the proper white men in his life who will help him see that he did the exact right thing the first time, and he should never turn and slink away in the face of anti-white racial aggression.
Let's hear from Harold on this.
Let's go way, way, way back now, boys and girls, into the dark mists of RFN's past, to the very first Radio Free Northwest, back in January 2010, where Harold saw fit, in the very first show, to highlight the importance of how we must behave in the face of the enemy.
He lets us know that our enemies must be faced down, and that there is nowhere far enough that you can run that they will not chase you down and stab you in the back as you flee.
The Northwest Independence Movement has one single overriding imperative.
The world...
Must change.
The purpose of democracy is to prevent change.
The purpose of revolution is to bring it about, and that is our purpose.
I am not ruling out the possibility that one day the Northwest Front might run in elections, but it will only be to provide a legal format for revolutionary organizing.
Specifically, the Northwest movement is based on a number of principles, all of which I believe are demonstrably true if they're approached with an open mind.
One of these is that the white race is faced with literal physical extinction both here and in Europe.
Establishment media now admit that white people will be a minority on this continent by the year 2050, and that doesn't even take into account the problem of the age of the white population at that time.
The second basic principle of the Northwest Imperative is that the United States of America in its present form is doomed.
And that the only way to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children is physical separation from the mud-races.
And this requires territory, land of our own, and a government of our own.
This white homeland must be a sovereign and independent nation, where no non-whites, no Jews, no homosexual perverts, and no bird-brained liberals are even allowed to live.
All those people have to be completely removed from the political and social equation.
And when people say to me, "Oh, Harold, you're a monster, you're cruel and mean and heartless," I tell them to go take a flying leap at a rolling donut.
My eyes are on the prize, folks.
I want the result.
An all-white world where white children don't have to go through what we've had to go through in our lives.
Yes, Virginia, sometimes the end does justify the means, and that is the case with white survival.
The survival of the white race on earth is non-negotiable.
The 14 words of David Lane are non-negotiable, and we need to start manning up and doing what is necessary to make sure that there are still some people with our color skin alive on this continent in another hundred years.
You can't cure disease without dealing with germs and the infection they cause.
Historically, human problems are very seldom caused by nature anymore.
The Black Death wiped out one-third of Europe in the 14th century, but this isn't the 14th century anymore.
Earthquakes in Haiti notwithstanding, the Western world has the science and technology now to beat famine and plague and...
To predict and deal with things like hurricanes and volcanoes and repair the damage they do when they occur.
The white man does, anyway.
Black primitives in Haiti don't, but I'm not concerned with them.
If global warming were real, which it's not, it wouldn't wipe us out, because science, white man's science, I might add, would find a way to deal with it.
No.
In recent centuries, human problems have been caused mostly by people.
And the only way to put a stop To some problems is to remove certain people from participation in the process.
That may sound cruel and cynical, but it's true.
And if you look at human history, that's more often than not how mankind solves its problems.
Through proactive human intervention that one way or another removes certain groups, nations, and races from the picture.
That's just the way it is, and it's not going to change just because some people don't have the courage or the energy to do what is necessary to save white people from extinction.
Now, there have been, and still are, some white separatists who think that we should do like the Amish and just buy some land somewhere out in the boondocks and go off and live in little log cabins and be on our own and to hell with the outside world.
Well, unfortunately, it doesn't work like that.
The establishment will not allow anyone to opt out of this system.
Ask Randy Weaver.
Ask the Branch Davidians.
Ask those Mormon fundamentalists in Texas, whose compound was raided last year, and whose children have been taken away from them to be raised as brainwashed American consumer animals.
It is impossible to secure the existence of our people and a future for white children without establishing our own territory, Our own state and our own government.
It is impossible for white people ever to be truly free, or even to survive as a race, without confronting the Zionist state, without confronting the empowered Zionist and liberal ruling elite, and removing them from power.
They have the power, and if we are to survive, we cannot continue to try to escape and evade and hide.
We must take their power away from them and appropriate it for ourselves.
In the real world, that's how it works, and we have to start living in the real world.
When a man is attacking you with a gun or another weapon in his hand and trying to kill you, you may survive for a bit by running away, but if you're in a cage, even a cage as big as the United States of America, and you can't flee out of his range, then eventually that armed killer will catch up with you and find you.
When a man is attacking you with a weapon in his hand, you can't just turn your back on him and ignore him and pretend he doesn't exist, hoping that he'll concentrate his murderous intentions on somebody else and always pass you and your loved ones by.
Tyranny needs victims.
Human beings and human blood and suffering are the fodder on which tyranny feeds, whether the tyrant be Hammurabi or Genghis Khan or Stalin or Barack or St. Obama.
You might achieve survival for a time, if not peace, through silence and submission.
The monster may not bother you for a while, if you're very quiet and don't attract his attention.
But eventually he's going to notice you, and it will be your turn.
All you accomplish by turning your back on him and pretending he doesn't exist is he'll shoot you in the back.
In our society, the armed homicidal maniac with a gun who's coming to kill us is the United States government.
If we do not disarm this crazy man, this insane beast, then it's going to kill us all and force our children to live in a world that doesn't bear thinking about.
The End Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be talking about the alt-right mindset.
And this is written by an anonymous author who claims to have been a formerly ignorant human.
Now, the premise of this book has to do with truth and goodness.
Truth is simply defined as what is, and goodness is what is conducive to life.
Now, this seems to be very simple.
And in fact, the author notes that children are often happy because they see by instinct the relationship of truth, beauty, and goodness and are therefore untroubled.
But adults and adolescents may struggle.
Now, this author is very concerned about the topic of religion, which is noted to be the mind of society.
Readers are warned that this author has strong dislike for Christianity and sees it as the basis of all current problems.
Indeed, this author views Christianity as an anti-religion, and the alt-right, or you could substitute for the term alt-right, you could talk about the movement in general, is viewed as a fundamentally religious occupation.
Now, this author speaks of right-mindedness and talks about how when a person is in a state of right-mindedness, their greatest fear would be to fall from divine love.
But, indeed, because of the materialistic nature of the world, there are many individuals who do get caught in ego.
Sometimes people will try to separate truth from goodness.
And then, at that point, you just have a great many facts.
And facts, indeed, can be used to support pretty much anything.
Sometimes, goodness can be separated from truth, and then you become very selfless, but you may do harm because you don't really know what you're doing at that point.
Now, another era, this time the author is talking in terms of the movement itself, is pragmatism.
Specifically, what if someone is superficially productive but has a questionable personal life?
The author notes that people should live the lives that they preach.
Now, this is an author that has a certain fear of charity.
Because he fears, and I do think that this is a male author because of the comments that he makes in this book.
I certainly get that energy or that vibe, so I'm just going to use the term he.
He does have a certain fear, as I say, of charity, and fears that it might be confused with morality and justice.
Now, again, this author is talking in terms of the movement, and he talks a lot about having correct knowledge.
And by this he means that it's important to live out what you know and understand.
And by living out what you know and understand, this author is indeed talking about activism.
Now, this author is also somewhat puritanical.
Because while this author is okay with occasional enjoyment, especially for health's sake, something like exercise or eating fruits and vegetables, this author also is very concerned about those who overindulge in pleasure for pleasure's sake.
And he talks about how happiness actually comes from pursuing goodness rather than pleasure.
Now, this is an author that is happy to grant positive liberty and has a tendency to question negative liberty.
Now, positive liberty would be the freedom to do what is right, whereas negative liberty would be freedom from something.
And the author notes that rights come from responsibilities.
Now, the author...
Does want to stress that he does believe in certain individual rights, such as the choice of profession.
And indeed, the author notes that if Western society is to continue, it probably would continue on with some sort of aristocratic government.
Now, this government might be a national socialist or some kind of monarchy.
The author really isn't certain what type of government, and indeed it might vary with location, but indeed the author notes that government is always meant to ensure the dignity of individuals and also environmental health.
Now, under a state of perfect government, activism would be quite naturally and organically put to rest.
Because under the perfect government, people will not be unsettled, but rather they will be joyful.
And I suppose one could reflect on how joyful people were during the Third Reich.
For example, when you watch films like Triumphs of the Will, you can see the people's great joy.
Now, this author is also for the formation of an ethno-nationalist party.
This author is not a believer in entryism because he really seems to believe that entryism is disingenuous.
There really is not a party out there right now, or at least not a strongly supported party, not a party supported by the mainstream, that is in fact ethno-nationalist.
And this author wants such a party to come into being and to become a real political force.
And this is not so much a strategy for anyone to get elected.
In fact, it's more of a strategy for a possible conflict that this author imagines.
Although doesn't necessarily welcome, but perhaps imagines and perhaps even dreads.
And he feels that such a party would make this conflict more difficult for the opposition because it would gather in many people today who would, I suppose, might be termed normies.
Using the current alt-right jargon, but again, this movement, this book is really more about movement than about any so-called segment or hip terminology.
Now, this author is very optimistic about the millennials because he talks about they have the internet savvy to promote the movement.
And like many people anywhere near this movement, this author really feels that this is a movement that has suffered from a lack of leadership and hopes that there'll be greater leadership in the future.
And this is an author that is greatly inspired by Eastern religion and societies, and as such, is an individual who puts a lot of emphasis on harmonious societies.
Now, this author, even though he has such disdain for Christianity, He notes that Christianity has weathered various storms, and he talks about the switch from Catholicism to Protestantism, and I'm not sure why he mentions this.
I'm not sure if he is saying that Christianity has been resilient, and the movement can also be resilient, or whether he's saying that Christianity over time has in some ways, and I'm not exactly sure.
At any rate, the main point of this book is to inspire individuals, I would say really throughout the movement, to think of this movement in more philosophical and religious ways.
My only possible criticism of this book is that I would like to see this author delve more into the applications of this philosophy.
In terms of how it would really apply to actual societies or even theoretical societies.
So at any rate, I've been discussing the alt-right mindset, and this is by an author who is writing under an alias calling himself a formerly ignorant human.
So I hope you enjoyed this discussion and have a good evening and Hail Victory, comrades.
Thank you.
We do have a musical selection for you this week.
This song is by the Swedish International Supergroup ABBA.
From a time before Sweden became the rape capital of Europe due to its corruption through non-white immigration.
When I first heard this song 20 years ago, it instantly became one of my favorites of theirs.
It's certainly not one of their most famous, but it has the haunting melody and serious undertones that make it an absolutely fitting selection for today's show.
This is Soldiers.
Soldiers.
Soldiers.
Or is this just a fantasy?
Is it true that the beast is wakened, stirring in his restless sleep tonight?
In the pale moonlight?
In the grim of this cold December, you and I have reason to remember.
Soldiers write the songs of soldiers, sing the songs of you and I don't sing.
They blow their horns and march along.
They drum their drums and look so strong.
You'd think that nothing in the world was wrong.
Soldiers write the songs of soldiers, sing the songs of you and I won't sing.
Let's not look the other way.
Take it a chance.
A lift of you and it starts to fade.
We do one day.
What's that sound?
What's that dreadful roar?
Won't somebody tell me what I hear?
In the distance controlling me.
Is it only a storm approaching?
Or the thunder and the blinding light?
In the winter night?
In the grim of this cold December, you and I have reason to remember.
Soldiers write the songs of soldiers, sing the songs of you and I won't sing.
Soldiers write the songs of soldiers, sing the songs of you and I won't sing.
They blow their horns and march along.
They drum their drums and look so strong.
You'd think that nothing in the world was wrong Soldiers write the songs, that soldiers sing the songs that you and I won't sing Let's not look the other
way, we'll take him a chance But if the viewer starts to play, we too must end Soldiers write the
songs, that soldiers sing the songs that you and I won't sing Let's not look the other
way, we'll take him a chance But if the viewer starts to play, we too must end Let's not look the other
way, we'll take him a chance Let's not look the other way, we'll take him a chance Like many songs, that one holds meaning of deeper significance.
Especially poignant is the insight that when the bugle starts to play, everyone will be forced to jump to the tune.
In what is to come in America, no white man or woman will be spared from the requirement for submission.
Events like this week's travesty at the Lincoln Memorial and its aftermath will continue to show whites across our civilization that the enemy's bugle has already sounded and we are all being marched upon.
And there is not one of us who will avoid the coming dance in this struggle for the future of the planet.
As for you listening to me today, you are in the right place here with Radio Free Northwest and the Northwest Front.
Tell us when it is your right time.
Hopefully you will tell us sooner rather than later, and rally to the bugle call of our race, come to the homeland, and help us ready our people and prepare for the coming battle.
Thank you all for listening, and we'll talk with you again soon.
Radio Free Northwest is brought to you by the Northwest Front, P.O. Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310.
You may also visit the party on our website at www.northwestfront.org.
▲
Export Selection