All Episodes
Previous Next
July 5, 2018 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:10:42
20180705_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush your vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token whistle, out the marching tune.
Warrior bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
Which are by, upon your shoulder, by the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud walled cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed warning light.
The waters passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon, at the rising of the moon.
And a thousand days were flashing out, rising on the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's July the 5th, 2018.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, this week I'm going to give you guys your YouTube reading first.
Now let me refresh your memory.
These are short audio pieces read by me, the purpose of which is for you to snip them with a sound editing program like Audacity or WavePad.
Then upload to as many YouTube channels as possible to make sure that if the party's multiple websites were ever interfered with, all my audio work won't just disappear like a lot of, say, Bill Pierce's did, because no one thought to record his shortwave broadcasts and old public access videos from the 1980s and 1990s.
Or else, like so much from that period in the history of the National Alliance, it's all mysteriously vanished.
Anyway, here you go.
If I had to pick the absolute worst thing that political correctness has done to us, I would say that would be the way it has driven a now almost insurmountable wedge between white men and white women.
On several occasions in the recent past, I have expressed my concern about the growing level of hatred, contempt, and anger which has arisen between men and women involved in the so-called alt-right.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know, we're not alt-right.
I know there's something called alt-right with all kinds of hair-splitting and discussion of various kinds of people who should not be among us at all, but anyway, let's just take all the usual disclaimers as read, please.
This isn't about the alt-right.
Nowhere else is the genocidal and anti-human nature of left-wing political correctness more apparent than in the division that it has erected between the sexes.
Nothing else has caused more suffering, anguish, disruption to civilization or loss to the world's white gene pool than the creation of a society where men and women view one another as adversaries and competitors instead of partners.
The instigation and propagation of this hatred between men and women is the beast's greatest success story, possibly in the long run a greater victory for the darkness than Zionism, Marxism, or both world wars.
Nothing serves the beast's ultimate agenda of population replacement and white genocide more efficiently.
When men and women hate one another, the number of babies born drops like a stone, and we get closer and closer to that point of no return where our racial extinction becomes inevitable.
White men are becoming increasingly embittered and misogynist, and white women increasingly feminist, misandrist, and hypergamic, that is to say, only marrying up, seeking mates based only on superior social status, wealth, and material goods.
Hypergamy leads to serious damage to the gene pool and a plunge in white births.
The level of conflict and hatred between the genders has reached the point where there are now well-populated internet tendencies such as MGTOW, men going their own way, the incel movement, and the so-called manosphere.
Women display their own animus towards men of their own race by simply withdrawing and having nothing to do with us, basically going off in a corner and bitching about men to one another.
In some cases, white women have gone over completely to feminism, perversion, and political correctness, although not as many as it sometimes appears, I think.
I suspect that if honestly offered the old deal from an honest and decent man with a real trade or profession who looks and comports himself like a man and not an overgrown child, then most women would jump at it.
Let me make clear that I am not only referring to a small group of internet cultists here, which is essentially what white nationalism is right now.
I am referring to men and women as a whole, the remaining portion of the world's Caucasian population throughout the Western world, which has at least the potential to recover themselves morally and socially, and to return to some form of sanity and productive life.
That is...
Big If...
If our wee little movement can ever get our act together, and we can purge the politically correct toxins from our moral and social systems.
We've always had this problem.
Gender representation in all forms of white, right, or racial dissonant movements has always been badly lopsided.
Generally speaking, right-wing and racial groups, or I should say audiences, since we're all internet now and there's no more real-world organizations consisting of actual human bodies.
Anyway, our audiences have a membership, which is about 95% male, of which probably about 60% of that audience is over the age of 50, which is, I think, a little better than it used to be.
We used to be, frankly, in the late 90s and the early aughts, nothing but a bunch of geezers.
And maybe 80% of our present audience is over the age of 30, which leaves about 20% to be under 30. In other words, like all dissident movements, we attract the very people who are most seriously affected by the crisis on a personal level, and who have been personally sodomized by America.
I won't get into the whole yadda yadda yadda about boomers this and millennials that.
We're not talking about that here.
We're discussing the entire white population of the world.
Both genders.
After we lost the last of our buildings back in the early 90s, we used to hold meetings in rented motel banquet rooms.
Some guy would take a photo with a speaker for the newspaper or the newsletter from the rear of the room, and all you saw was the backs of gray heads with the few women present having blue hair.
In other words, wealthy, more or less upper class women.
Not a body under 55 in the whole room.
The internet has changed that, at least.
I will say that there has been some marked improvement in the age level of the white nationalist and separatist audience over the past few years.
We're getting some women now, although not anywhere near what we should be, even some of childbearing age, which never used to happen.
Young white men and women are being damaged more and more by political correctness, especially when it comes to college admission and being able to get a meaningful degree that will actually let a young person earn a living in an environment which is no longer physically or politically safe for young people of our skin color, women as well as men.
I know a lot of young white men and women are coming to us now because of the way that they have been personally victimized.
Unfortunately, by other white women in many cases.
Let me make it clear just what I'm driving at here.
In the past, I've said that there are some problems which our movement should not even attempt to solve until such time as we have full state power in a land of our own, but the problem of misogyny and hatred between the genders is not one of them.
I believe that this issue is so crucial to our racial survival that even in our present discombobulated state, We need to begin making an effort to resolve this situation now.
We have to start rebuilding bridges between ourselves and our sisters.
I've said that I wish it was possible to sit down across a negotiating table from some kind of women's delegation and commit Western women to some kind of treaty or social compact that would involve our sisters deserting the enemy camp and returning to our side where they belong.
On the quid pro quo that we men would, in turn, grow our asses up, cultivate a work ethic, and stop acting like perpetual adolescents in an American Pie movie.
And stop doing a lot of other really nasty things that women have every right to complain about.
Back in the 1890s, France was considering giving women the vote, and some famous French feminist, whose name I can't recall, was given the honor, unique for a woman at that time, of addressing the National Assembly in full session.
All male, of course.
They sat there, attired in their full formal dress suits, with the cravats and the white gloves and the spats, the wide shoulder sashes, the decorations, top hats, and other such 1890s, politicians, fripperies, all very French.
The lady was up on the podium, haranguing them with her feminist rap, which was listened to in polite silence.
She concluded her speech with...
Really, messieurs, you must acknowledge that when one comes right down to it, there is very little difference between men and women.
At this remark, the entire French Chamber of Deputies spontaneously rose to its feet as one man and shouted out, VIVA LA DIFFERENCE!
Men and women are different, not inherently inferior or superior to one another, but different.
To say that one's sex is in any way inferior or superior to another is like saying that apples are inferior to oranges or vice versa.
They are two different fruits.
the idea of them being equal or unequal to one another isn't really a thing.
The differences between men and women are about 20% environmental and psychological, That 20% being subject to a certain degree of limited manipulation and alteration, but by no means as much as feminists would like to have us believe.
That's the part we need to work on.
But beyond that, gender differences are 80% genetic, biological, structural, and biochemical.
It's therefore pointless and absurd to try and create in men and women two equal humanoid organisms.
It can't be done.
And it is clearly the intention of nature that it not be done.
Men, on the whole, are physically larger and stronger than women.
There are evolutionary reasons for that having to do with the biological functions for which both genders were designed by nature or God, if you will.
Yes, there are individual exceptions, more so in today's politically correct culture, as white males degenerate into Dilbert-esque cubicle rats and mom's basement dwellers, and women become more masculine in character, which seems to somewhat augment their physical size.
But in more or less organic, non-politically correct societies of all races, men are always larger and stronger.
As an aside, one of the most sinister developments in recent years have been several statistics, surveys, and studies indicating that sedentary American white males are actually losing their virility in the physical as well as the moral sense.
White sperm counts have been dropping for almost 20 years.
We are becoming less than men in every sense.
Nature, through millions of years of evolution, has given human men and women a natural division of labor, one which cannot be repealed by feminism or affirmative action.
This natural division of labor can't be changed by mentally disturbed women running around naked and screaming in public, which is apparently the latest feminist thing.
It can't be changed by anything.
It's hardwired into all of us by whoever or whatever brought us here.
That natural division is simple.
The man, with his strength and propensity for violence, provides the food, the shelter, and the protection from enemies for the family unit.
The woman bears and raises the children.
This is how human beings are supposed to live, indeed the only way they can live past a couple of confused and chaotic generations of the kind we're experiencing now.
It is innate.
It is biological.
It cannot be changed, and any attempt to tamper with it produces disaster and destruction, as we are now learning in Obama's America, the house that Barry and Hillary built, and which we're learning cannot be dismantled quickly even by a duly elected president of the United States.
No baby creatures are more helpless than human infants.
Snakes and alligators are self-sufficient from the time they hatch.
Birds and kittens and puppies are up and functioning and providing their own food in a matter of weeks.
Human babies must be fed initially by a mother's milk for a period of months and then on specially treated and prepared food for another year or so.
They cannot defend themselves or escape from an enemy unaided.
Children can't really live on their own with any hope of survival for the first 10 or 11 years of life.
The whole traditional nuclear family, so hated and railed at by liberals and feminists, is an institution ordained by God or the gods or nature or the force or the great pumpkin or whatever to make sure that the human species continues to exist.
The primary purpose of the man-woman relationship is to produce children and care for them until they are adult enough to fend for themselves.
The emotional and cultural side benefits of marriage are valuable, invaluable, hell, and they've produced our whole civilization, but they are, in fact, just incidental byproducts of the central process of continuing the human species.
The father and the mother are not the most vital part of this picture, although they are essential, of course.
The children are.
Primitive non-white societies in Africa and the Third World still follow this pattern, in many cases increasing their fecundity through polygamy.
In Western culture, for the most part, men and women have generally made it for life, down through the years.
There are some records of polygamy in ancient Aryan cultures, but not as many as elsewhere.
The ancient Norse and Germans practiced it for a while, but gave it up around the turn of the last millennium.
And for good or for ill, once the white race became Christianized, polygamy pretty much vanished, except for the odd minor exceptions like the Mormons for about fifty years.
Men and women are two halves of a whole.
Neither can or should exist without the other.
The idea of two halves of the same organism competing with one another, dominating one another, or existing in enmity with one another is an obvious recipe for destruction.
This is why the beast promotes the idea that men and women are some kind of natural enemies, as it promotes any and all things which are destructive and poisonous and breed confusion and unhappiness among our people.
The beast hates us and wants us all dead.
And it uses every weapon to bring this about, including feminism.
Homosexuality is a loathsome perversion.
It is absolutely and utterly wrong because it denies the natural division of labor between man and woman, and because it precludes the production of children.
The instinctive loathing that the overwhelming majority of normal people feel even today for faggots and dykes is an inner recognition on the part of our genetic makeup, or souls if you're Christian, that what is going on is a natural and counter-survival, or sinful.
This is why politically correct brainwashing and social engineering, which is relatively successful in obtaining a grudging acceptance of mud people as equals, Seems largely to have floutered when trying mentally and emotionally to coerce people into accepting the open practice of sodomy.
This is especially true when it involves a sodomitic threat to children.
Whites are still capable of anger in action when the local school board tries to bring in Heather has two mommies, about the only thing left they will react to.
Millions of years of genetic codes triggering biological survival behavior can't be overwritten by 50 years of Hollywood propaganda or suppressed by hate speech laws.
In order for us to recover the peace, the happiness, the stability, and the strength that we once had, white people must seek to recreate a world based on natural order, and that most specifically includes a return to what are referred to as traditional family values, with the gainfully employed father as the head of the family and the full-time mother and homemaker as the heart.
This does not in any way involve enslaving women.
In the very real sense, it liberates them from feminism and Judaic values and the true slavery of the marketplace.
The women of the future will have a freedom which they have all but lost today, the freedom to be real women.
What feminists want, claim, or advocate is not relevant to anything in the real world.
They more than liberals as a whole are doomed to eventual defeat and disappointment, however much they may have achieved a very temporary and very slight superficial success in the English-speaking world.
Feminism is essentially a form of sexual perversion because it distorts what is natural in the sexual roles of men and women.
Feminism, like integration in all forms of liberalism, can only be imposed on both men and women at the point of a gun, literally or economically.
Remove the force of the beast's law and the economic necessity for women to work simply to make ends meet, and feminism will die and die quickly.
Within a generation, it will be nothing more than a bad memory.
Hello.
My name is Rico, and I'm a future Northwest migrant.
I'm currently in the process of coming home.
In my case, it'll be a literal homecoming.
I grew up a few miles from where the party's headquartered, but like most people in my generation, failed to launch when it was appropriate to do so, and so I got dragged down to Texas with my family when I was 19. If I'd known about the Northwest Front back then, I never would have left.
But I didn't, so I did, and now I have to get myself prepared to return to where I started.
A few years back, I lost a decent paying job here in Texas for what was essentially being a racially conscious white male in a land of diversity and neocons.
Afterward, I decided there was no point in staying in Texas and dealing with the hordes of shitskins.
As sure as shit wasn't going to try to start a family in this cesspit, I decided going back to the Pacific Northwest was my only option.
The question was where.
I grew up in western Washington, so I didn't need to scout that region out.
I refused to live in a place where people can't pump their own gas, so Oregon was out.
How about Montana?
I'd heard good things about Montana.
A month or so later, I made a scouting trip to Kalispell, Montana, where some Stormfront users had attempted to build a pioneer little Europe.
Being back in the Northwest again, even if only for a few days, was refreshing.
Everything was clean.
All the signs were in English.
Graffiti was nowhere to be found.
White people walked around town without a hint of fear.
In fact, the only non-white face I saw the entire time I was there was a mulatto girl working at the Burger King across the street from my motel.
Unfortunately, there was one other thing missing in Kalispell.
Jobs.
The Flathead Valley is a fine place to settle, but it only really works if you already have money when you get there, like Richard Spencer's family.
One of the major problems I see with a lot of people who are interested in the Butler plan is they have this idea that they can just pack up and go off into the woods in Montana or Idaho and just plop down and get a good job and support a family.
That's simply not the case.
I've lived in isolated towns and rural areas, and there's really nothing in them as far as jobs go.
That's why in the past people did things like joining the army or taking a one-way bus to Hollywood to get out of them.
They knew they had no future beyond working at a cash register or a gas pump in those small towns.
You're not going to be able to settle in a place like that and support a family, assuming you can even support yourself, especially if all your skills are white-collar or something in food service or retail.
It quickly became apparent that if you want to successfully migrate, you're going to need to go to where the jobs are, as in the metro areas, and have a trade that's actually relevant to the region.
I used to be involved in security and corrections, but nigger wrangling isn't exactly something there's a lot of demand for in the homeland, so I'm currently training to be an auto mechanic.
After all, new males who wear their sister's pants and drink soy can't even change their own oil, never mind replace brakes or a timing belt.
The rest of you need to be picking up a useful trade as well.
Like the old man always says, if we're going to have gainful employment in the current year, we need to have the skills to fix rich people's toys.
There's a major shortage of workers in the skilled trades, and that shortage is going to get even greater once people who got into them decades ago start retiring.
Skilled mechanics, plumbers, electricians, truckers, and welders are always in demand and can practically walk into a shop and walk out with a job.
There's no need to worry about being replaced by some street shooter with an H-1B or a spick who will work under the table for half of what you need to survive.
In addition to having the required job skills to support yourself, you need to pick the right area to migrate to.
Heading off into the woods in Idaho sounds appealing to a lot of people, but not only is it not all that viable, especially for outsiders, but it's not all that helpful either.
If you've been listening to Radio Free Northwest for more than a few weeks, you'd know that Harold has been begging for, above all else, Class A people who are actually willing to help the party get the ball rolling.
You need to actually be near the party to do that, and the party's headquartered in the Seattle metro area, not in the woods.
If you want the Northwest homeland to become reality, you're going to have to suck it up and live near the cities and the liberals, and actually put some effort into making it reality.
Nobody's going to do it for you.
Godot isn't coming unless we ourselves become Godot.
Besides, going off in a woods to hide from Zog and diversity doesn't work anyway.
Ask Randy Weaver.
He tried to hide from Zog in a woods, but Zog found him and his family anyway.
To successfully migrate, not only do you need to have the right job skills and physical location, but you need to have the resources to survive when you finally come home.
That means a few thousand dollars to keep a roof over your head while you try to find a place to stay and a job.
I've got enough money in my wallet to drive back to Washington right now.
But once I get there, I'd be pretty much shit out of luck, because neither Harold, Andy, nor the trucker are going to let me sleep on their couch.
This isn't the 1960s, and Northwest Front isn't Commander Rockwell's American Nazi Party.
There's no flop house for t-shirt youth.
You have to stand on your own two feet now.
One of the key criteria for becoming a Class A individual is being able to not only physically migrate, but do so using your own resources.
The party isn't yet at the point where it can hold your hand when you migrate, and probably won't get to that point anytime soon.
To that end, I bought an RV last year and am currently in the process of getting ready for a cross-country trip.
That way I'll have a place to stay and all my stuff with me when I come home and won't have to bother finding a motel or apartment, dealing with a moving truck, or unpacking.
RV parks are also an extremely cheap place to live, which is absolutely critical in a place like the Seattle area, where housing is more often than not absurdly expensive.
RV parks also tend to be not very welcoming to diversity, so that's nice too.
I'm not suggesting everyone should go that route, but it's at least something to think about if you have somewhat limited resources.
Saving on rent by living in I hope I didn't ramble too much.
I'm not quite old enough to become Grandpa Simpson just yet.
Hope I'll see you guys in the home months soon.
Thanks for listening.
This is the Chieftains.
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing The Fall of Western Man by Mark Collette.
This is a very stark philosophical book, and it examines Western modernity through the lens of the psychological state.
So rather than dismiss Freud as some would as being, well, he was a Jewish psychologist and...
We shouldn't look at his ideas or his ideas about the layers of the self.
This author says no.
This author says let's look at how the antagonists of the West have used knowledge of the self that was pioneered by Freud and how they've used this to really attack Western civilization.
As you know, if you've ever taken even a college-level psychology course, one of the things that they talk about is this notion of the self as being made up of the id, ego, and also the superego.
The id is something that we're all born with, of course.
It has to do with just the primitive desires that a person would have.
But, of course, just these raw desires really aren't enough beyond infancy.
So a person will go on to develop the ego.
The ego in this understanding of the self is actually a rather...
Positive thing in many respects.
I know that a lot of times Buddhists, for example, will talk about reducing the ego.
Maybe that's all right if you're a monk or something.
But in the real world, you do need an ego because an ego, it deals with things like safety.
It deals with things like the ability, I suppose, to earn a living, for example.
And it just moderates your desires.
Of course, when you have only the id and the ego, you end up with a society very much like the ones that they have in the third world, for example.
You know, when I think of a society that has ego and has id, you end up Probably was a society kind of like what they might have in Africa, for example, where there's a lot of chaos and maybe an inability to pull together and to develop that society.
So what further gets developed...
And particularly, I suppose, in the first world, and I suppose in any kind of northern culture, whether it's Europe, or I suppose also in places like China, you'll get a development of the superego.
And this has to do with a certain collective conscience.
And also an ideal self.
This is really the only way to make sure that a society can selectively flourish.
Now, this author has criticisms both of capitalism and also communism.
And both of these systems will deny the superego in some way.
With capitalism, at the worst, you might be denied a conscience.
And with communism, at the worst, you might be denied this development of an ideal self.
So the author is concerned with both of those things.
The author is also very concerned with the lack of positive role models, particularly for the youth.
And he's very concerned with the frivolity of youth and the way that popular culture really glorifies the id.
And he talks about how highly individualized we are these days and also this notion of all the various subcultures that tend to develop for fairly trivial reasons that tend to attract the youth.
Of course, when you have this situation going on, it might be bad enough on its own, but when suddenly you have all these individuals and families coming in from other cultures, individuals coming in from maybe a Muslim culture or strongly Catholic, you know, South American culture or something like that, you have these cohesive groups coming in, and you're not cohesive yourself.
It's very difficult to obviously compete with these groups, and you end up losing ground in terms of demographics, for example, in many cases.
And I suppose you lose ground as sort of a collective culture.
This author is very concerned about...
How there can be false salvations that people tend to look to.
And the first one is conservatism.
If you think about conservatism at all, you'll see how it's like a cliff.
You think you're standing on a cliff and you think the water is far below you.
But the problem is that the cliff keeps on eroding.
So what was conservative 10 years ago, for example, is not what was conservative today.
So it just keeps losing ground.
And he says that anyone who seriously looks at conservatism, particularly things like cultural conservatism or something like that, you'll see that all you ever do is lose ground and you're in this sort of rearguard.
Sort of defensive position.
You know, I mean, it's like you think about the German invasion of Russia, for example, and you're always defending territory.
At a certain point, you start defending and not taking more territory.
And so eventually you lose out.
Now, the second thing...
And a bit more sophisticated and a bit more durable is a notion of libertarianism.
So let's say that you decide that you're going to be a true conservative in the sense that you just want to have very few laws and sort of leave everybody alone.
So if someone wants a very straight-laced lifestyle, they can have that, but they can also have a wild, crazy lifestyle.
And it's kind of like, if you don't bother, I won't bother you, and we'll just respect each other's space.
This sounds good, and I think it works okay if you're talking about adults.
However, the author makes the example of, let's say you're raising a family.
So you're in this really...
Sort of conventional or they call you square or you've got this really nice family.
But the question is who your children are going to associate with because everybody is either they're from the third world or they're engaging in some odd kind of lifestyle choice or something like that.
So it works okay for adults, but then what kind of future is that?
It's harder to sort of sustain that.
So then a third thing that someone might fall into.
Let's say a person goes through conservatism and perhaps libertarianism and nothing really quite satisfies.
So then the person might become somewhat more radical.
And so this author starts to talk or write about in this book, he writes about specifically the skinheads and this notion of a race war.
Criticizes the skinheads because he says that if they really believed in a race war, then they would be doing a whole lot more military training than they are.
He also says that normal people, even if there was a crisis, Most normal people would find them too drastic and too violent and also too irresponsible.
He talks about how they might be living in like a warehouse somewhere and not paying rent and just being like squatters.
And I don't know if that's always a characterization, but he talks about how if someone were to take that, particularly the way they're portrayed in the media, for example, most people would be turned off by that.
Either they would be turned off or it would attract the wrong kind of people.
So he says that kind of thing is another pitfall.
The other kind of pitfall, of course, with violence is that if someone went out and attacked, For example, a schoolgirl from Mexico, well, most normal people are going to sympathize with the schoolgirl.
They're not going to sympathize with a drunken skinhead or something like that.
So the author says that is also a false kind of salvation.
What this author does recommend at the very end of this book is a return to nationalism and the development of the superego.
Which is all very logical.
I mean, this is really, you have to understand, this is a philosophical book, and it's very stark.
And there is a simplicity about it, which is very clear.
The one thing that this author doesn't go into, and this is something I've talked about in other books, when you talk about anacrofuturism, for example.
There are some people that will talk about a kind of mega-national alliance.
And because this book is more philosophical, the author keeps it much more simple.
So again, I've been discussing The Fall of Western Man by Mark Collette.
And this is something that I was able to find out on the internet, and I was actually able to find it for free.
And I was very pleasantly surprised with this book, or very happy with this book, because I think that it can give someone a lot of mental clarity.
So I thank you for listening.
Have a good evening and hail victory, comrades.
The End We're going to do what they say can't be done.
We've got a long way to go and a short time to get there.
I'm best around just like a band and run.
If you put hard on the belt, some of them will find it breaks.
Let it all hang out cause we gotta run the bait.
Number four.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the trucker coming at you from Clearwater, Minnesota on a run from the homeland down to Georgia.
And for those of you that are making your scouting trips or actually migrating, the gas prices across North Dakota and Minnesota, I forget what they were at, Montana, were under three bucks a gallon, like two...
$79, something like that, a gallon for the most part.
But like I say, less than $3 a gallon.
And for you 11th hour and 59 minute individuals, I know there are going to be a crap ton of you out there.
You know, my last trip home, I was headed to Deliverance Coma and then went home for doctor's appointments.
And I got there to the receiver early, parked out on the street.
Checked in and just kicked back, watching movies, taking the dog out every once in a while, that kind of stuff.
And later on, I had the dog out.
This other driver got out with his dog and we were BS'd around.
He'd come the exact same route that I did, but he ended up getting, took him hours longer than it did me because I did mine early in the morning and I was already parked by...
I forget what the heck time it was, like 7 or 8 in the morning, maybe a little earlier.
And this is on Memorial Day, coming back from eastern Washington.
And he got caught up in just a crap ton of people coming home from the holiday weekend.
Nothing more than that.
And it took him, like I say, hours longer than it did be.
So, when the SHTF actually kicks in and you guys are bugging out for the homeland, you're going to end up experiencing the same thing.
And along with that, probably raise gas prices and a heck of a lot longer commute or travel time, whatever you want to classify it as.
Just look at every time a hurricane hits the East or Gulf Coast and all the people that waited till the last damn minute trying to get out of there, out of the storm's path to relatively more safe areas.
I've experienced that trucking.
I was going into Florida as a hurricane was due to hit the next day, but it was due to hit the east coast, and I snuck down the west coast of Florida.
Yeah, we got some winds, but nothing more than that.
And I got my load delivered on time, nothing late, and all that.
Managed to dodge the storm, but the company I was driving for at the time, the idiot dispatchers, had me dispatched up I-95.
Following the storm, and I told them where to stick it, and it went up I-75 instead of I-95, so I eliminated, avoided all the driving through all the storm damage.
So, you guys might want to think about that.
If the balloon does go up, and you're out there, you're going to have to go through a bunch of metropolitan areas, or dodge around them, and, you know, having to avoid all that, plus being able to find gas, just...
Read Freedom Suns and Horicovas, I guess you pronounce it?
Anyway.
Alright, well, this is the Trucker signing off from Minnesota.
Hope to see you out there on the homeland or on the road making your scouting trips and migration to the homeland soon.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the trucker coming at you from Johnson Village, Colorado.
And this is about priorities, in my opinion.
Take it for what you will, but you really don't need to be keeping up with the Joneses.
Every six months or a year or whatever, kicking the new, latest, greatest doodad.
Be it that new iPhone, iPad, laptop, generation 26 Glock, whatever.
Me, personally, I'm still running a flip phone.
I have a refurbished, picked it up from Amazon, Toughbook.
Cost me $200 and change, not even $250.
I bought a couple of accessories for it, like the GPS antenna to go on the corner, so I don't need to plug in a separate GPS antenna into the USB port and have to worry about it getting knocked out by the doggy or something like that as I'm going down the road.
It's got a solid signal all the time, and plus, yeah, I splurged a little bit.
I went and bought the 12-volt power cord for it, so I can go and plug it into the cigarette lighter, or power cord, if you will, to be able to run it going down the road rather than having to plug it into an inverter.
So that makes it real handy.
As far as vehicles, wife's got a 12-ish-year-old van.
I'm sure she'd like to have a little bit newer one, but hey, it runs just fine and gets the job done, and we don't have payments on the damn thing.
My motorcycle?
Don't ride it much anymore, but I'm out on the road all the time.
But I don't have one of the new gollywogs with six cylinders and fuel injection and way cool stereo that goes up and down in volume with the speed and all that kind of crap.
No, I have a 1982 Honda Aspen Cade.
Still runs fine.
Needs a little work to it, but I'm not riding it, so I'm not worried about it.
It's just kind of sitting there in the garage right now.
But yeah, you don't need to go and get a new car every couple of years.
I know most of you.
Oh, well, we'll just go and lease it.
Yeah, that's a real good idea.
Lease it.
If you go over on the mileage, then you get the big shaft.
So, I prefer to owe my vehicles outright.
No payments.
Don't have to worry about that.
Just insurance and tabs on the damn thing.
And the older they are, usually the less you have to pay in insurance.
Another nice benefit.
So, anyway, well, this is something I just thought I'd go and throw out there.
So, maybe you ought to go and reprioritize your money and stuff.
Rethink it, not go out there and blow your money on all the latest, coolest, newest doodads.
Okay, well, that's just my opinion.
Alright, this is the Trucker, signing off from Colorado.
Have a good one, comrades.
Hope to see you out there on the trail behind your team of oxen, making your scouting trip and your migration soon.
Hope to see you out there.
We've got a long way to go.
Any short time you get there Congress found just watch a bandit run Congress found just watch a bandit run Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
This is Andy Donner.
Today, I'm going to wrap up a series I began early in January this year about emotional difficulties as they relate to white nationalism.
Now, be warned.
I'm trying this off the cuff today with no script.
People have seemed to respond well to that over the last few RFNs, so we might just make it a habit around here.
Before I get going, I do need to apologize for the length of time it's taken me to address this subject.
Truth be told, I haven't really wanted to give this talk.
I knew that some variant of what I'm about to say to you would eventually be produced, but this is especially difficult for me, not because I'm having some sort of emotional problem, though you could argue that, but because I'm genuinely afraid of the reaction to what I'm about to say.
There have been times people have deliberately, and not so deliberately, to be fair, misunderstood what I've said on RFN, and they've had a negative emotional reaction to it.
I don't think any of those have been exactly justified, but what I'm about to say to you today really might be cause for some sort of upset.
To briefly recap, this entire series was spawned by something a female so-called comrade said to me over social media at the very end of last year in 2017.
She had to apologize for some very odd behavior when a few of us disagreed with something she said and all we did was ask her to explain her opinion.
She immediately realized she'd said something utterly ridiculous, and instead of saying, oh, hey, maybe I shouldn't have said that, flipped out and pulled the usual female, you guys are just ganging up on a girl!
Of course, that doesn't play well, since we've kicked out plenty of female grifter interlopers out of the alt-right and elsewhere over the last year, so that obviously wasn't going to pan out for her.
Anyhow, you'll note I called her a so-called comrade because, well, she's more alt-right than she is white nationalist, and quite frankly, she's willing to support any sort of moral degeneracy and outright reprobate behavior as long as it comes out of the alt-right.
And that's not atypical of the alt-right, but, you know, it is what it is.
But that's neither here nor there.
What she said to me was that she was having an incredibly hard time emotionally because she just honestly wasn't sure white people were going to survive.
You'll note she's talking to the Northwest Front, and you know what the Northwest Front would tell you about that, so I'll skip all of that, only to point out that she herself absolutely refuses to become involved in anything that might actually save our race from genocide.
But more on her in a second.
Prior to her showing her true colors, I promised her that I would address this subject on RFN, since this more or less bumps up right against the thing I have needed to say, but haven't wanted to for some time.
And that thing is, I don't at all share that emotional issue as it pertains to white genocide.
Now, I have in the past, and I'm going to talk about why I have in the past, and I'm certain plenty of you do as well.
The reason I'm so afraid to make this admission that I just simply don't relate to the subject in that way anymore is that many of you will feel betrayed or hurt or abandoned or whatever, and none of that is my intention.
So, if you're starting to feel upset that I've said this, Hold tight, wait, listen, and then decide whether or not you want to get pissed at me, please.
Sometime before finding the Northwest Front, and right up until the point when I realized I had more or less secured my own Northwest migration, I was very emotionally upset about the issue of white genocide and whether or not we as a people were going to survive.
And rightly so.
It's not as if we're doing any better than we were some decades ago.
In fact, things are worse.
If only because there are so many faux movements today that are more or less rehashes of things that didn't work before that we don't have any expectation of any further success.
Outside of the Northwest Imperative, of course.
As I said, I myself experienced this incredible, overriding, and sometimes panic-inducing concern of whether or not white genocide was actually going to happen.
Unfortunately, we're still on path for this to be the case.
But what's interesting in reflecting on my own experiences, having come out of that and finished that phase of my emotional involvement with this entire subject, is that the extremity of that emotional entanglement was punctuated very clearly with my lack of participation in my own migration process.
In other words...
People who are actively trying to solve this problem in such a way that they really do involve themselves in the Northwest Imperative tend to not have that issue and tend to not be upset at this in the way others are.
Okay, that might piss even more of you off since it sounds like I'm being some sort of arrogant asshole and merely trying to brush the issue aside and say, come home, white man.
And okay, there's a bit of an element of that, but it's kind of my job.
What I'm actually trying to point out is that there's a way out of this problem.
Yeah, it's not convenient, but there is a solution to whatever effect this is having on you.
When I was attempting my own homecoming, I was especially concerned, worried, and anxious when, over the span of a week, I knew for a fact I hadn't done what I needed to do to make sure my homecoming was going to come off as expected.
Conversely, even when things weren't going especially well, if I'd put in my effort that day and a certain amount of effort that same week to attempt to relocate myself successfully, I didn't feel so bad about it.
And I will note that several people who have made their own migration successfully have given you the same advice on Radio Free Northwest.
I realize many of you may not like what I have to say, but I can only point out that I'm not the only one saying it, and I'm not the only one saying it based on their experience.
So, rage all you like, but it's not as if I'm leaving you out in the dark, I'm actually trying to get you to come along and cooperate with the process that will prevent you from being re-exposed to these feelings.
In fact, Radio Free Northwest has repeatedly addressed the issue of white communities and white support systems, and to be perfectly frank, we're the only ones actually trying to do that.
And I want to reiterate that no, I'm not just saying this and then kicking you all out in the emotional cold and expecting you to just fend for yourselves.
The Northwest Front and those associated with the party are more than happy to be your support system.
You kind of just need to be where we are so we can actually do that.
Briefly, I want to share a couple of examples of emotional issues that people have brought to our doorstep, metaphorically speaking, that they could have entirely avoided had they followed our advice, just to cement the fact that, no, I'm really not trying to just disregard the way this impacts all of you.
Now, to do this, I'm going to dredge up a story from my childhood, or more specifically, from the childhood of my younger brother.
Back when the issue of emotional responses, as opposed to logical responses, to white genocide was coming to a head, Harold was tweeting quite a bit about just this.
One of our newer contacts insisted that nobody whatsoever was addressing emotional issues, and simply because he didn't see anyone being emotional.
Now, the trouble with this is that just about every refusal for involvement in the Northwest Imperative, up to and including homecoming, really is just a simple...
I don't want to.
Yeah, I'm being a dick about that, but what can I say?
It's my job.
Anyway, here's the story.
One day in kindergarten, my younger brother was sick, and he had to stay home from school.
And he was incredibly upset at staying home from school.
And my mother asked why, and he said, but what will my teacher do all day?
Now, there were 20-some-odd other students in his class.
His teacher was going to more than have her hands full.
But he didn't understand that because he still thought the world revolved around him.
And jokingly, you know, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, I would say to this newer contact that, no, really, there are an awful lot of emotional responses to the subject of white genocide and to the subject of the Northwest Imperative.
The decisions made to not participate are almost entirely due to emotional attachments, which, if you'll remember, is why I started very gently in, in January, trying to explain this subject in terms of what is and what isn't an appropriate emotional attachment for a white nationalist.
I'd recap all that, but this is going to go long enough anyway, so if you're really curious, go back, find my segments in January.
Now, this next story is what I regard as a bit of a tragedy, and it's not as if many of us haven't had this happen to us in our lives or in the lives of our families or people we know and have even had our lives destroyed by things like this, but it's important to note that this happens if we don't engage correctly with emotional entanglements.
Some longtime contact that I'd never actually heard of signed up on the message board one day this last year and told a really, really sad story.
I don't know if he knows how sad it is simply because it's still ongoing in his life, but here goes.
And no, this is not me criticizing him.
This isn't me trying to rake him over the coals or anything like that.
I just need you all to understand that this is kind of what ends up happening if you don't handle these subjects correctly.
This guy had come around to the decision to actually do his own Northwest migration, which is fantastic.
The trouble is, he's one of those guys from the South, and I get to say that because I'm a native Texan, okay?
I know, I have forgotten, actually, more about the South than most of you ever learned, just so we're clear.
Anyway, this guy was one of those Southerners that had the attitude of, this was my great-granddaddy, and my granddaddy, and my daddy's daddy, and my daddy's home, and I'm not gonna leave, so, yeah.
Well, it turns out he lost his great-granddaddy and his granddaddy and his daddy's daddy and his daddy's home.
I don't know the circumstances, but he simply didn't have possession of the property anymore.
So he was put up somewhere somehow, and he was working on rebuilding his life to the point where he could actually come home.
Okay, good on him, and for the record, I'm genuinely sorry that he had whatever hardship he had.
Many of us have experienced these things, many of us have seen relatives experience these things, and many of us spend our lives in absolute fear of experiencing this thing.
I don't in any way mean to demean what's happened to him or to make fun of it because it's not remotely funny.
But what I have to point out, I must point this out because I'm duty-bound to say it, as difficult as it is, is that his emotional attachment to that subject was not precisely correct.
Because if you go back far enough at some point in his ancestry, that was not his home.
That was not his ancestors' home.
His ancestors made the decision to pick up from where they were and go there because that's what they needed to do at that time.
Those very same ancestors whose decisions made that your home would tell you to up and come northwest.
And if they wouldn't, well, I don't know what to say about that, but you don't need to respect their opinions in that case.
And that being the case, the emotional attachment to that being your home is precisely what lost it for you to begin with.
If you were thinking rationally about what is and isn't a home, you would have been much more able to do something about getting out of that property and going where you need For the record, I wish this person nothing but good, because they've at least come to the right conclusion, albeit after a very difficult experience.
I'm only bringing it up so that if some of you are in a similar circumstance, you can think a little bit more objectively and a little bit more clearly, and make better decisions for yourself and your race that so badly needs you right now.
Now, as for the so-called comrade, the not-really-comrade that spawned all of this, her case is interesting in and of itself, because periodically she would go back and forth with Harold and I about various things, and her interest in anything actually resembling a solution other than this generic support of, you know, we must stay unified, we must be in the alt-right, so on and so forth, it showed itself for what it was, because she was utterly uninterested in anything involving actually ending white genocide, but when Harold asked her point-blank, okay, so...
How is this going to happen then?
Her attitude was, by any means necessary.
Obviously, that's an outright contradiction, because everyone says, by any means necessary, right up to the point where they themselves have to actually do anything.
And we're not even asking for anything illegal.
Anyway, her posting history over various social media accounts was always very intriguing, to put it politely.
She couched the whole issue of white nationalism in what you would think was a correct male-female dichotomy in that she was adamant that men actually step up and save our race.
You would think that's correct, except that this turned into men just need to do whatever she wants.
And eventually I figured out that was her situation simply because she fell in support of another popular alt-right female figure that insisted Ben jump on the grenade of marrying single men.
And that was, again, couched in the, if you actually love your race, you'll love your race as women, and you'll love your race as children, because they need husbands and fathers.
And not exactly a MGTOWER myself, but I have to note that, is that really a wise thing to do?
The situation you're coming into is almost certainly going to disintegrate simply because it disintegrated before, or else they wouldn't be single mothers.
So why is it that men should just be expected to jump on that grenade for women that have already made some horrendous mistakes, for the most part?
Again, I realize that's not all of them, but I have to say so, or else somebody's going to jump down my throat because they're looking for a reason to disagree with otherwise valid points.
And again, this isn't to call her out, it's only to demonstrate that when you're not relating to white nationalism and the Butler plan correctly in your emotions, it becomes very difficult to relate to other things.
I took some very odd attempts in retrospect at explaining just this thing every time I tried to address the white character problem in years past.
During a couple of those attempts, I made the point that genuine white nationalists will need some sort of outlet for their white nationalism, and outside of the Northwest Imperative, you're not really going to get that, because deep down...
Everyone knows it's either this or we're done for.
And that still stands, and I think we have a perfectly valid example of that.
Not just in her, but in others that I've brought up today.
Getting a handle on your emotional reactions to white nationalist issues and white genocide in particular is utterly critical to actually thinking about what is and isn't a solution.
Now look, all we have left is to beg and plead that you all do this because we're running out of ways of explaining precisely what needs explained.
At some point, you're all either going to have to get on board with this, or we're dead.
Hail victory, comrades.
Hail victory, comrades.
Who are you?
Who are you?
I woke up in a Soho door where a policeman knew my name.
He said, you can't go to sleep at home tonight if you can get up and walk away.
I staggered back through the underground and the breeze blew back my hair.
I remember throwing punches around and preaching from my chair.
Well, who are you?
Who are you?
I really want to know who are you.
Tell me who are you.
Who are you?
Cause I really want to know who are you.
I took a dude back out of town, back to the rolling pin.
I felt a little like a dying cow with a street dog red in me.
I stretched back in a handcuff and looked back on my busy days.
Eleven hours in the tin pan.
God, there's got to be another way.
Who are you?
Come on, tell me.
Who are you?
Thank you.
Who are you?
Who are you?
Thank you.
Some of you will probably bitch and moan, oh, I didn't get my Harold ration for the week.
Well, this will make up for some of my fairly recent RFNs that were nothing but me rabbiting on and on about this and that.
Anyway, by way of winding up this week's episode, I do want to say a few things here, some...
Pretty serious stuff, which, once again, I'm hampered in because of my inability to conduct a private conversation with you guys, due to all of our unpleasant neighbors who listen in over the back fence.
So, once again, I have to fall back on what Lennon called a sapien language, the language of fable, and give you guys a few lines that hopefully you can read between.
I've already said on several prior occasions that as the alt-right implodes, more and more of the serious elements who gravitated to that particular internet phenomenon have become aware of the Northwest Front.
And as Richard Spencer and the rest melt away into irrelevance like the Wicked Witch of the West, and they turn into dollar store Glenn Beck's trying to scrape a living off their YouTubes and their Patreon accounts, the small percentage of alt-right fanboys who are serious about wanting racial and political change are gravitating toward the Northwest Front, as they should.
One of the results of this sudden upsurge of interest in the party is something that I'm starting to find a bit disconcerting.
That's the phenomenon that I seem to be becoming something of a tourist attraction, along with Pike Place Market, the Space Needle, and the original first Starbucks.
Now, I'm used to meeting with people who are on their scouting trips and giving them what assistance I can.
I've been doing that for years.
But I'm starting to get people more or less demanding audiences by email and coming here to Seattle specifically to see me, just for that sole purpose.
And absorb my magical emanations or whatever they think they're going to find here.
Now, I've already discussed this phenomenon several times in private in the party's organizational letters and in my private kitchen table talk audios, and so I'm not going to get into the subject in any depth here.
I will reassert something that I've already said in public on Twitter and Gab and elsewhere.
Right now, the party is in a kind of internal crisis.
Because after almost ten years of my tap-dancing around like Richard Gere in Chicago, we have hit the wall.
The wall that I always knew we were going to hit.
The wall where words simply aren't enough anymore.
The wall beyond which we can't just keep on self-publishing books and doing podcasts and writing blogs and basically producing an endless stream of nothing but words.
The point where we have to force our movement off the internet and back into the real physical world of actual people and human bodies and physical acts done in that real world by those bodies.
The point where, in order to proceed further, the party has to receive concrete and material assistance from serious, committed adults.
In other words, the NF is now at the starting line from which every other white racial nationalist effort since the 1980s has failed to launch.
Beyond that, I won't get into details any further.
Those of you who need to know what I'm talking about, know what I'm talking about.
So, that's the first thing you need to know.
Some of the people who have come here over the past year and sat at my feet to absorb my immortal pearls of wisdom like I'm some kind of goddamn Buddha have departed, not liking what they've heard.
And you know what?
At this point, in my little script here, I wrote out almost a page of stuff that developed into a long and passionate rant about things I shouldn't be ranting and raving about in public, so let me delete that and let's move on.
I know that's better.
Look, guys, this Northwest deal is very much a case of the song, not the singer.
Don't come here to see me.
I've had people literally fly from around the world to come here and meet...
Me, face-to-face for an hour in a cheap chain restaurant and get whatever the hell deep, dark, secret word of knowledge they think I'm going to impart to them in person.
And a lot of these people have left here bitterly disappointed when they learn that I don't have anything more to say in person than I've already said in my novels and on these podcasts.
Don't come here to see me.
Come here to see the land, the people, the jobs, the beauty, the hope.
Not me.
Come here to see Multnomah Falls, Coeur d 'Alene, the Crater Lake or the Glacier National Park, Astoria or the Great Columbia River Gorge.
Come here to see the cities and the towns and the small communities with all the white faces, not to see some tired old man for an hour in a restaurant.
You already know what he's going to say.
Come here to choose a home for yourself and your children, the place where you will live out your days.
And one day you or your sons or both will answer the call to finally take those guns out of the closet and the cabinet and make yourselves and your descendants free men again.
Come here to breathe the air and find streets that you can walk down without hearing the gabble of foreign tongues of the booga-booga-booga of the monkey men.
I'm the past, guys.
I've pretty much done what I come here to do.
You haven't yet, not by a long shot.
Your day is yet to come, so look forward.
Always.
But our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sarsha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection