All Episodes
Previous Next
June 14, 2018 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:00:03
20180614_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you curry so.
Push your wooggle, push and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot, by the river, right the norm to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token, whistle up and arching tune.
Warrior pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, which arrived upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed morning light.
Warms passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew, and a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were watching through the night.
The manly chest was shining at the rising of the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's June the 14th, 2018.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
I recently had a message from a guy that I know on the periphery of our movement, the upshot of that message being that he listens to Radio Free Northwest, he reads his NF Bulletin, he wishes me all the best and all that, but he can no longer be associated with me because I am a quote-unquote terrorist.
And if he is ever in any way connected with me by the FBI or some other secret police organ, then he will quote-unquote get in trouble.
Well, the short answer to that is yes, you may well get in trouble if you're in any way associated with me in the official mind.
I'm not going to deny that, and all I can really tell you is that unless and until enough of us are willing to get into trouble with the government of the United States, then life on this continent is going to become an unbearable hell on earth that no one of us can really imagine.
That's the price of change.
That is the price of making things better for our children and for those yet to come.
Somebody has to get in trouble.
Are you willing to let your children, your grandchildren, and all of our children and grandchildren suffer?
Suffer contempt, oppression, servitude, desolation, and murder because you're a chicken-shit coward who is afraid that you'll get in trouble?
If so, then you've got a lot of company.
Most white men and women are too timid and frightened to do anything at all about this.
If the small number of us who are not can pull it off, then perhaps someday in the future all of you yellow dogs out there will live long enough for your own children to spit on you.
Now, let's deal with that terrorism crap.
In point of fact, no, I am not a quote-unquote terrorist.
I wouldn't be ashamed of it if I were.
Terrorism is the weapon of the weak against the strong.
It usually involves a very high risk of self-destruction, and therefore, regardless of what moron Jews and howling Republican idiots in the media say, it requires an immense amount of courage.
I admit it, I do not have the personal courage of Bob Matthews or Joseph Paul Franklin or Joe Stack.
What I am is a writer, and for the past nine years a speaker with a very small audience.
In real life, our weekly number of hits on our podcast would fill a medium-sized auditorium, although probably one out of the four attendees would be Jews or media or undercover cops or goat dancers or strange little men from that 90s show.
If you don't know what all the fuss is about, read my Northwest Independence novels.
You can order them online.
To make this long story as short as possible, it's true that, in one sense, what I do is an act of treason.
I speak of the death of the king, and in medieval and renaissance times, that was quite literally treason, as in headlopping and boiling in oil and being burned at the stake treason.
For many centuries in Europe, not only was it treason to speak of the death of the king at all, but if you were into astrology, as most people were back then, it was treason to cast the king's horoscope, because that might reveal the time and manner of his death.
It was treason and punishable by death to speculate on who might succeed the king in the event of his death, which you weren't supposed to be talking or thinking about to begin with.
Henry VIII was the worst about this kind of thing.
If you even referred to any of his miscellaneous wives or children by the wrong title, depending on who was supposed to be legitimate that week, and which religious faction was on top of the palace heap, you might find yourself boiled in oil.
And by the by, Henry VIII was the only king of England who ever actually did that.
Anyway, what I'm getting at with my usual obscure historical references is that officially, in those days, the king was immortal, at least insofar as anything said or even hinted at in public went.
Everyone had to pretend that the present was the permanent order of things and the monarch would never die.
They all knew it was crap, and they knew that the king was mortal like everybody else, he just didn't dare to say it.
Our own lords and masters are like that.
Officially, America is forever.
Some years ago, a tame university egghead called Francis Fukuyama even wrote an entire essay to that effect, titled The End of History.
Therein, he proclaims that liberal democracy is the ultimate form of government, and that from now on, mankind's future is one long endless strip mall where happy contented wage slaves will slurp Starbucks and gobble down Happy Meals.
While we are ruled from behind the scenes by soulless businessmen and executives in expensive suits, as well as a few rabbis in blue-knitted skullcaps to whisper in the ears of those businessmen and executives.
Can you say George Soros?
Sure you can.
I say that's crap.
I speak openly of the death of the king, of the end of America, and what's worse, I say out loud how I'm pretty much convinced it will end.
By a breakup into several smaller black and brown and hippy-dippy ethnostates.
I believe that it is absolutely imperative for the future of all humanity, not just our own people, that when that happens, the white man must acquire an ethnostate of his own out of the wreckage for use as an all-white homeland where our race can rest and recuperate and restore our numbers while the rest of the world goes to hell in a mass slaughter, as will inevitably occur in any society ruled by non-whites.
I believe that the establishment of this white homeland will be attained through some kind of armed insurrection or confrontation between white Americans and the United States and its armed men.
That is a very dangerous opinion to hold.
It's even more dangerous an opinion to speak out loud.
Do you know why?
Because I'm right, and pretty much everybody knows it, even though some may not admit to the fact out of fear or self-interest.
This is not a matter of my inciting anything.
I am simply making a factual observation that there are hundreds of millions of privately held firearms in this country and that conditions are deteriorating to the point where eventually someone is going to load one of those firearms and shoot it at a politician or a judge or a congressman or a multinational executive or an FBI agent or a cop or a news anchor.
Or any one of the thousand and one people who are both actually and morally responsible for the America we were born into turning into an unspeakable horror show with subtitles in Spanish.
The feds cannot allow me to continue to say these things out loud.
Someday someone might actually do something, and it won't just be Joe Stack crashing his airplane into a mysteriously empty government building.
It's like a dog who starts killing chickens or a bear or alligator who kills a person.
Once it happens, the animal has to be destroyed because now he knows it can be done and how easy it is.
And the regime can't take the chance that white people might someday figure out that badges and black robes and briefcases and $2,000 suits might be neat accessories, but they don't make anybody bulletproof.
Once that knowledge spreads, America is done for.
The FBI and other secret police agencies are charged with the task not of enforcing laws, but of keeping the lid on, which is not the same thing.
If you don't believe this, then take a look at all that has gone on with the FBI since the election of President Trump and all of the revelations that have come out about how the Federal Bureau of Investigation and, before that, agencies like the Internal Revenue Service under Obama have become completely...
The FBI, which once had the at least pretense of being an impartial law enforcement agency, not to mention an image to match, I mean,
that rumbling you hear is J. Edgar Hoover turning over in his grave.
I'm not breaking any laws, but that's never mattered much where we're concerned, and ever since the Edgar Steele case, it doesn't matter at all.
So yes, there is indeed a chance that if you are associated with me in any way, you will get in trouble.
Okay, next up.
I try to keep outright reading of my own material on this show down to a minimum, but sometimes such readings are appropriate and useful.
I had a guy contact me and ask that I go over an old piece from some years ago he found called Covington's Twelve.
And although it took me a while, I finally dug it up on the ThoughtCrime blog.
So here goes.
You guys who have sound editing software might want to excise this segment and drop it into a YouTube or onto a CD of some kind as a kind of short audio book for people to listen to in their cars, whatever.
You can use them for...
Pithy little propaganda bullets, or whatever.
I'm not going to expound too much on these 12 points.
Just listen to them and think about what I'm saying here.
This is part of our We Little Movement's Teo, or Basic Spiritual Foundation.
It's called Covington's Twelve Principles.
Principle number one.
Covington's Paradox.
The cause is so right, the people in it are so wrong.
Now, you guys want to know why there's so much bullshit in the movement, both on the internet and in the days before the internet?
That's why.
Right cause, wrong people.
Point number two, Covington's Corollary.
Just because the people in it are so wrong doesn't mean that the cause is not right.
Point number three, If and when there is a white revolution in this country, it will be made by men who live within half an hour's drive of one another.
Guys, the internet is a tool, not a weapon.
It is a form of media and communication which we must have, but it is not a solution.
We know where the solution lies, we just won't go there because we are too weak and timid and frightened.
Point number four.
I can find a thousand men who will fight and die for the Northwest Republic.
I can't find ten who will work for it.
This one is especially poignant in view of what's been happening internally in the Northwest Front over the past two years.
Point number five.
Judaism is not a race or a religion.
Judaism is a state of mind.
Some of the worst Jews you'll ever meet won't have a drop of Hebrew blood in their veins.
That's from the late Pastor Robert Miles, one of the greatest true leaders we ever had.
I didn't fully understand what Bob Miles was saying when he first told me that.
I understand now.
The office is inseparable from the man.
If a contemptible man holds a public office, then we are under no obligation to respect either.
Point number seven.
All law and political power is based on a credible monopoly of armed force.
Break that monopoly of armed force and you break the state.
Ideas like this, or my habit of speaking ideas like this out loud, are probably what will get me killed one day.
Point number eight.
The respect of tyrants is earned by the shedding of blood.
It is the only way to get their attention.
And yeah, we all know that too.
We're simply too terrified to do anything with it.
Point number nine.
Now listen up on this one, guys.
People who fear even to speak of armed struggle will never succeed in supplanting the state.
Those who will at least speak of it, albeit with discretion where required by common sense, have some remote chance of winning.
However far they may be from home plate, they're at least in the right ballpark and playing the right game.
Think about that one.
And guys, really try to wrap your minds around what I'm going to say next.
Point number ten.
Direct action without a specific political goal is just crime and will fail.
A political goal without direct action of some kind to attain it is just fantasy.
And it will fail.
The two mixed together in the wrong proportions will fail.
Finding the right proportion between direct action and attainable political objective is an art.
It varies in each individual case, and there's really no way to teach it.
Successful revolution is always, in the final analysis, played by ear.
11. Moral courage is just as important as physical courage, sometimes more so.
Okay, if nothing else I say here tonight registers, burn this last one into your hearts and souls.
Point number twelve.
Character counts.
Thank you.
I've spoken before on this program about our movement's problem with misogyny and feminism, so as a kind of an antidote to all the depressing stuff, here's a quick shot of weird Aryan history for you on the subject of how actual Aryan women lived and throve in the past.
I'll tell you about a woman named Hildegard von Bingen, who lived 81 years from 1098 to 1179.
At the age of eight, she was dedicated to God as an anchorite at the Monastery of Disibodenburg in Germany.
Despite being confined to her tiny cell, she displayed precocious spiritual and intellectual gifts in reading, writing, music, and Latin, to such an extent that by the time she was in her teens, other monastics were clamoring to study with her.
Elected abbess of her convent, Hildegard wielded as much earthly power as many a secular ruler.
She pursued a remarkable career as an administrator, a herbalist, a mystic composer and playwright, always stressing God's goodness and mercy.
By the end of her long life, she was famed far beyond her convent walls, advising and sometimes chastising popes, princes, and potentates.
Both her music and her writings are enjoying renewed popularity today.
I might add that I have my own collection of Hildegard von Bingen music CDs, which include some of the best Gregorian chant and choral music pieces for women ever written.
Hildegard was one of the first composers of medieval sacred music actually to write down her songs in a musical format, which is still decipherable today, so we know what they sounded like.
This is O Viridissima Virga from the Hildgaard von Bingen Vision album.
O
Viridissima Virga O
Viridissima Virga O Viridissima Virga O
Viridissima Virga O Viridissima Virga O Viridissima Virga O
Viridissima Virga O Viridissima Virga O Viridissima Virga
O Viridissima Virga O Viridissima Virga O Viridissima Virg O Viridissima Virga
CHOIR SINGS
Tonight I'm going to be discussing the H.J., Volume 1, by John R. Angalia.
Now, this is a small encyclopedia dealing with the history of youth education within the Reich, but also in the ten years preceding it.
The H.J. dates back to 1922, and the BDM, or something similar to it, dates back till 1927.
Now, in the early days, the organization that would precede the H.J. was organized by Gustank Lank.
And Lank was a nationalist, and as a result, in the early days, he was frequently in and out of prison.
And the organization, thus, was often disrupted, and it had many different manifestations.
Now, eventually, this organization was taken over by Kurt.
Gruber, and by 1936, this organization was officially named the HJ.
Gruber was named the Reichsführer of the HJ, and initially this organization was conceived as a training ground for the SA, but it quickly became more associated with the General Party.
Now, in 1928, it would end up growing in two ways.
For one thing, it merged with another nationalist youth organization.
And also, too, by 1928, it would expand from ages 14 to 18 to ages 10 to 18. Also, too, Gruber would have something of a competitor.
In Balder von Schraich, who started out as the leader of the National Socialist Student Association.
Now, von Schraich would become the Reich's Jugendfuhrer, and he becomes more famous than other youth leaders because he was featured predominantly in Triumph of the Will.
Now, in 1936, membership in the H.J. was made mandatory, and in 1940, von Schraich was actually reappointed as Galatier of Vienna, and he was replaced by Arthur Axman.
At the beginning of...
The H.J. Service Group, which was a working branch of the H.J., became compulsory, and this was extended to the BDM in 1941.
The Association for Girls was first established in Plavin in 1927.
And the need for such an association came to the attention of Reichsführer Gruber in 1928.
And at this time, a sister organization was established, and this organization was renamed the BDM in 1930.
Like the HJ, it would eventually become an organization It served girls from the age of 10 all the way up until the age of 18, and it was even expanded until the age of 21 with the organization Faith and Beauty.
Now, as with the HJ, there was also a certain power struggle going on with the BDM.
Initially, the National Socialist Frauenschaft wanted to control the BDM, but Hitler reminded both parties these were simply organizations within the NSDAP.
They simply served individuals of different age groups.
The BDM was for girls and young adult women, whereas the Frauenschaft was for older women.
Eventually, the BDM would make up 40% of this youth movement, and this was an organization that saw a bit more turnover than the H.J. did.
In 1933-34, Elspeth Greif Walden would lead this organization, and from 1934-37, we would have Trude Berkner Marr, and then From 1937 until the end of the war, we would have Dr. Junta Rodiger.
Before the war, the BDM tended to focus on the domestic arts, along with nursing and land service.
They also participated in educational and various sporting events, marching events, camping events.
During the war, they often had to fill in for men who were at the front, and they were involved in various civil defense activities and also caring for the injured and the sickly.
Also, too, it doesn't mention it here, but they were also involved in making and collecting warm articles of clothing for the various soldiers on the Eastern Front.
And that was a very important service, indeed, of course.
This encyclopedia also deals a lot with uniforms, and as might be expected, It took time for the various uniforms to standardize.
Now, one of the fashion trends that I see in this book illustrated very clearly, at the beginning, particularly with the HJ, the uniforms tended to be of a light brown color, and that is sort of the archetype color that we often think of when we think of the SA, when we think of the HJ.
Over time, there seems to have been more and more black and also navy used for these uniforms.
Now, another interesting thing that happened is very often, according to this book, various armbands and other cloth items, small cloth items, were made at home according to a general standard.
And we're therefore out of strict compliance with party regulations.
Also, too, you may run across old photos which will show individuals who are out of strict uniform compliance.
And there may be various reasons for this.
An individual may have damaged their uniform, for example.
So with this sort of homegrown or handmade, at times, uniform items, I can see how some individuals in today's world might look at this historical president.
And say that they can make their own uniforms slash costumes home.
And as we know, this is much to the displeasure of Harold, who speaks of not making a spectacle of oneself with these costumes.
Now, another thing that an individual can do, if they wish to be somewhat more subtle and not get themselves in as much trouble, it is possible to find men Edelweiss flowers or various types of badges which are unmarked, that is to say they do not contain any swastikas or even any German words, for example.
One is very circumspect with what one buys.
It is possible, or was possible in the past.
It certainly was possible back in the day when I was in college.
Of course, they didn't have the kind of internet then that they do now.
But it was possible to find certain small items which one could wear if one wanted to wear an item.
And these were items that would go under the radar.
And most people wouldn't know what they were, and if someone did know what they were, they were probably a collector anyway.
So, again, I've been discussing the HJ, and I'm talking about Volume 1. Next week I'm going to be talking about Volume 2, and this is by John R. Angalia.
Just looking at these books, it looks like these would have been books that would have come out probably back in the 1980s, just looking at the style of the cover and so forth.
So these are a bit older, and I'm not sure where you could find them.
Perhaps you could look on Amazon if you'd like.
These were sent to me by Harold, and I'm always glad when he sends a box of books, particularly if it's something I haven't read.
So I hope you enjoyed this discussion.
Have a good evening and hail victory comrades.
We're about to die.
18 wheels are rolling.
Are we going to do what this shit can't be done?
We've got a long way to go.
And it's a short time to get there.
I'm westbound just like a band that runs.
If you put hard on the belt, some belt will bind your brakes.
Let it all hang out cause we gotta run the band.
Greetings, comrades.
This is the Trucker coming at you from Percival, Iowa.
On a load from Washington State down to Florida.
And this is for all of you down there in California.
Wondering how long you're going to stay there and take this.
I hear Governor Moonbeam just went and signed into law some kind of, I think it was 55 gallon limit per person per day on your water.
And you end up with a, if you exceed their limit.
They can fine you up to $1,000 a day or something like that.
I guess business is $10,000 a day.
And I've heard some Prepper website saying something about you can't take a shower and do laundry all on the same day.
You know, I think I've said it before, but I'll say it again.
We've got a chit ton of water up here in Washington.
Up here in the homeland, rivers are full.
No water shortage up here.
I don't know what you're waiting on.
You know, it's kind of stupid with California building all those cities out there in basically desert territory where it doesn't rain a whole lot.
And when it does rain, it ends up coming down these floodways and stuff and flooding out homes.
Businesses and stuff.
I saw that when I was stationed down there in San Diego.
The malls would get flooded out every couple of years.
So, yeah.
I don't know.
You guys are braver than me.
I mean, yes, I was stationed down there in SoCal for just shy of four years down there on the Navy base out there at Point Loma on Building 37. If you're in the Navy, you know what that meant.
Especially out there on the Ballast Point submarine base.
But, anyway.
Yeah.
Food.
Rows where water flows, and if they're cinching down on water that much, they're in Southern California, or California period.
It's not the best place in the world to be, this individual's humble opinion.
You really need to go and...
Consider your options for where you're residing at.
As I said before, the area where I live at, up there in Bremerton, they ended up, the city planners, way back when, at the turn of the last century, when they built Bremerton, they went and purchased the acreage and stuff, a great big-ass watershed up there around Green Mountain and stuff, the other side of Gorst, where the city has plenty of water.
Don't have to worry about it.
So, other areas in Washington are the same.
Similar situation.
They got plenty of water.
Snake River was full when I came by through Idaho yesterday.
Columbia River was really full when I came by on Tuesday, passed by it and stuff.
So, yeah, we're not in any big water shortage up here in the homeland.
Every river I went past was full of water.
All the hills were green.
Just gorgeous up here.
So, think about it.
Okay.
Well, this is the Trucker signing off from Iowa.
Take it easy comrades.
Hope to see you out there on the roads making your scouting trip and hopefully your migration soon.
Greetings comrades.
This is the Trucker coming at you from Percival, Iowa and...
I just thought I'd give a shout-out to Jason.
Thank you very much.
I've been doing my recordings while parked instead of going down the road so you don't have to listen to all the noises my truck makes as I'm bouncing down these sometimes smooth, sometimes not-so-smooth roads.
Anyway, so I got approached by a gal this afternoon at a truck stop there in the middle of Nebraska.
She was looking for a few gallons of diesel fuel for her motorhome.
What she was driving was a Chevy van-style small motorhome that you could go and park in like a car spot.
So that might be something for you young, single individuals looking to come up here.
She was, I guess, going from truck stop to truck stop.
She'd go and find a reasonable truck stop where she could go and approach truck drivers.
And while we were getting fuel, I asked if we could...
She could get a couple of gallons in her gas can and take it over and put it in her motorhome.
So she got a couple gallons off me, and I saw her get a few gallons off a few other drivers while I was sitting there doing my 30-minute break.
So that might be something that you young, single individuals, be it guys or gals...
I'm not talking a big land yacht here.
I'm just talking something that'll fit in a car spot, like a Sprinter, or like she was driving a Chevy van with a diesel engine in it.
The Sprinters all have diesels in them.
Something you can go in small enough where you can go and park in a car spot, but you can still camp in it, live in it.
It'll provide temporary housing while you're on your way up to the homeland, and until you find a permanent place to power your tent stakes in at, you go and stay in something like that.
I see a lot of them up here in our neck of the woods, where I drop my trailer or park my truck at.
I see people camping out in RVs all the time there.
I see some people actually living in their cars.
So the weather's not too extreme up here in the Bermerton-Puget Sound area, where I've seen them do it in the summer and in the winter, all four seasons.
So that might be a thought for some of you.
Just look for a motorhome small enough to fit into a car spot that's in reasonable shape, that's within your budget, and...
That, you know, something that's sound enough to go and at least make it up to the northwest and maybe do a little bit of commuting around and stuff, or you can go and search out where you actually want to live at, or you can go and use it to go and commute back and forth to work, because diesels are usually a little bit more fuel-efficient than gas engines.
But that's just a thought from the driver's seat here, so...
Alright, well, have a good one, comrades.
And this is Trucker signing off from Iowa.
Hope to see you out there on the road making your scouting trips and your migration fairly soon.
Have a good one.
Have a good one.
Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
Andy Donner here.
Before I really get going on today's Real Politics material, I need to answer a question I was sent over Facebook.
Comrade John, I am really sorry it took me so long to even see it.
For the record, if one of you wants to talk to me, I'll be right back.
I tend to ignore the other tab when I'm looking at Facebook messages, and John's question was buried there for a couple of months.
Anyway, Comrade John asked, If the state of Nazi Germany had not been defeated in war, do you think it would have held together over time?
Would the socialist elements have eventually agitated against the nationalist side, as in Rome and his essay?
Do you think it would have allowed for stable transition of power from one leader to another?
Are you aware that the Baath Party of Iraq and Syria was modeled on the NSDAP?
In those situations, the dear leader eventually outshined the party.
Do you think the fact that there was no check or balance on the leader's power was a good thing or bad thing?
It is a known fact that several military mistakes are directly attributed to Hitler.
I'm interested in National Socialism, but am not quite ready to admit it is the greatest form of government ever.
Ethnic nation-states ruled by hereditary monarchies did the lion's share of putting the white man on top back in the day.
I'm actually in a unique position to answer this question.
I myself am not a National Socialist, though some would say otherwise.
During a routine party meeting, Mack once described me as an agnostic National Socialist, so do what you will with my response.
Further, it's not at all the case that the Northwest Front pushes National Socialism or requires it of those interested in Northwest Nationalism.
No one here advocates it as essential racial dogma.
I don't perceive National Socialism to be racially unhealthy, and if the NAR ends up being a National Socialist state, That would be just fine with me.
There are two separate parts to John's question, the second of which I'll take first.
John, you made a number of very important observations about history and the leaders in it.
Regardless of the government involved, mistakes are attributed to any and every leader.
My first real politics talk actually went over the reality that America was almost a monarchy instead of the wrong-headed experiment the founding felons crafted.
After that, I went on to point out...
In practice, non-democratic forms of government tend to look the same since there's either one person or a very small group exercising a very large amount of power.
This is true for any non-democratic system, be it national socialism, hereditary monarchy, or some variety of oligarchy.
In any of these systems, the people in charge will always be the main focus since they're the ones responsible for what ends up happening, not their parties, supporters, or peers.
In reality, checks and balances will always exist in some way.
Factions exist, and always will, even in admittedly desirable monarchical systems.
Exchanges of power weren't always pleasant, so that concern is ever-present in any type of government.
Out of respect for John's concerns, I'm trying to stay objective.
Even so, I have to point out that Adolf Hitler is criticized from all angles, especially in the movement.
To be honest, this is all hindsight analysis, and in retrospect, everyone screws up.
Always investigate and consider the past, but don't stress over these sorts of things since they'll always be.
As for the first part of the question, I really don't see why National Socialism wouldn't have stuck around for a while.
Sure, white people tend to organically create shiny new ideas and philosophies, so I'm sure it would have eventually been replaced by something else.
But that's not exactly germane.
It's true that varying factions exist in every environment, but socialists wouldn't have had much of a reason to agitate in Nazi Germany.
There's no way every single person was happy, but that's just people for you.
Nationalism and socialism aren't mutually exclusive.
Remember, socialism isn't the same thing as communism, much to Rush Limbaugh's chagrin.
Just look at the difference between the Weimar Republic and the Third Reich.
National Socialism would have lasted since it was good for just about every last German.
But why?
Well, aside from the obvious racial angle, we need to consider economics.
With an honest economic system, Germany was able to rise out of the disastrous state it was in and actually enable common people to enjoy what would have been high luxury in other European countries.
You might say the National Socialist policies had a high ROI.
Today's talk is about just that.
In mid-December of last year, I did a housekeeping segment on RFN which has bearing on this subject.
The party and I are regularly approached about a possible, though somewhat fanciful, Northwest agency which would theoretically give substantial physical and financial assistance to those trying to come home.
The trouble with this idea is that the party would only agree to expend resources on those we think to be a good investment.
More specifically, the outlay of money in particular would cause the party to expect a good return on that outlay in the form of skills and services rendered by the migrants we would help with said money.
That is, we would expect a good ROI.
This is totally reasonable, since otherwise we wasted precious resources.
Just breaking even means we wasted the opportunity to use those resources in a better way.
I can hear you all wondering what in the world this might have to do with real politics.
Remember back to the RFN episode where I discussed the actual solution?
That, or think back to the Northwest Independence novels.
For this purpose, I like A Distant Thunder because it covers some of the fictional party activity prior to the revolution itself.
There's a particular strategy required to liberate colonial territory from a large, occupying power.
Everything the party does needs to align itself with that objective.
But hang on now, don't any of you slack in listening, since this part is important.
Prior to actually making a bid for independence, there are things which need to happen in order to support that bid.
By the by, they're still technically legal, but that's neither here nor there.
Anyhow, the return on investment of our legal activity must be the ability to execute and support the strategy which we've adopted.
Now, short of you people actually coming home and helping the party, we can't actually do what we need to.
However, it's still the case that we can waste our time and resources doing things we shouldn't do.
And that's just as bad, because it actually results in a negative ROI.
Now here's the thing.
It would be dumb of the party to invest the manpower, time, and money required to relocate someone of t-shirt youth quality because doing so is guaranteed to result in the total loss of that investment.
That's a bad ROI.
There's nothing but cost and risk with no potential for a payoff of any sort.
It wouldn't result in anything but a drain on the party, so it's not something we're going to do.
Not only does it not further the work required to create a fighting white revolutionary party in the Pacific Northwest, it actually detracts from other things we need to accomplish in the interim.
Now, with this base, I can make my point.
There's another activity which white nationalists are prone to, even though it has an abysmal ROI.
Harold has taken to calling this phenomenon streetwalking.
And no, this isn't about prostitution.
Public demonstrations are a white nationalist movement perennial favorite, but they're absolutely the wrong thing to do.
Let's recap.
There's only one solution to white genocide, and that's the Northwest American Republic.
There's only one way to realize that solution.
See the Northwest Independence novels for details.
Since that's the case, anything which either doesn't contribute to or detracts from it...
Doesn't give us any return and is, therefore, the wrong thing to do.
I'm going to wrap up today's talk analyzing the ROI of streetwalking.
This has come up several times on RFN, but I want to try this approach to see if it's any more effective.
Hey, I can dream, can't I?
Alright, so here's the deal with streetwalking.
A few of us get the bug to run around and make idiots out of ourselves with a sign...
And possibly chanting something pithy because we feel the need to be brave and show the world what mighty white Power Rangers we are.
Of course, there's the immediately obvious cost and risk involved.
Aside from the financial cost of whatever physical equipment, signs, funny costumes, and transportation is required, there's the immediate issue of one's identity being exposed to the world.
There's also the less tangible risk of making white nationalists look bad, but I'll get there in a second.
The one viable strategy we have available to us needs functional, reasoning adults who aren't all gummed up in society because their politics are known to the world at large.
Exposing oneself not only puts you at risk, it puts your comrades around you at risk of exposure as well.
Whatever you take away from my talk today, you do not under any circumstances have the right to make that choice for other people.
Doing so comes...
Desperately close to deliberately outing them yourself, and the party will take notice of it when it happens.
Think on that for a bit.
But enough about risk.
What about the rewards?
Well, there aren't any.
Streetwalking and other public events do not assist the strategy required to create the Northwest American Republic.
Mass demonstrations and political action aren't a part of the Butler plant, so at best they're a wash.
And remember, a wash is as good as a loss because it's missed opportunity to do something else.
Let's figure the ROI on this.
All risk and loss with no reward.
Wait a minute.
That's a terrible return.
No, really.
At best, the only thing to come of this is an emotional and possibly hormonal high, which is the real reason anyone ever does this.
I get that many of you out there are really into this sort of thing, but it's just not helpful or relevant to what really needs to happen.
And since I'm on the subject, don't try to sell me on the idea that this is brave.
Bravery doesn't mean taking stupid risks for no payoff, so public activity doesn't entail any sort of bravery.
It's stupidity, a little drunkenness, well, most of the time anyway, and perhaps a little roid rage if we're to believe stereotypes of white nationalists.
Even if there were zero risk involved in street walking, it would still be useless because it doesn't play a role in the task we need to accomplish.
Conversely, It's not cowardly to refuse to engage in dangerous activity when there's nothing to gain by it.
I've said before that I used to do my fair share of public activity, but it wasn't related to racial politics.
Further, when I did so, it was to stop specific events which were happening at specific times and places, and I was one of what was usually a very, very large number of people.
I figured I'd better come clean since someone would call me on it if I didn't.
I would go into details, but it would be rude of me to go on longer.
I know some of you are absolutely obsessed with public demonstrations, but please think back on what I said about obsession and enthusiasm.
Actually think about what you're doing in the future.
Your bad behavior will eventually cost you, and possibly someone else, very dearly Hail victory, comrades!
Okay, rather than go off on a long, deep closing monologue here, I'll tie up some more short points.
Now, one discussion I was having this week is...
I was asked to what degree all the movement misogyny is real and how much of it is some kind of internet plot by enemy cognitive dissonance operatives to mess with white nationalists' heads and drive white women away from us.
Well, I think that as far as the misogyny among actual white nationalists goes, most of it is unfortunately real due frankly to the bad experiences that virtually all of us have had personally with white women, which in some cases, such as my own, have been really horrific.
I myself have never been persuaded, inveigled, or manipulated into hating all women as women.
Because I understand why white women are the way they are and who has made them that way.
But just as racism is the result of personal contact with blacks, most movement misogyny is the result of personal experience with the vicious and deranged behavior of white women.
I still maintain that it's 50% our fault because white men are just as messed up socially and psychologically as women, and I still like the idea of somehow sitting down and negotiating a treaty with our sisters to bring an end to the war.
I also think that the whole MGTOW and Manosphere and incel movements on the internet are probably organic in that they consist mostly of real men who are genuinely angry and upset with women's behavior.
And I understand how Generation X and millennial men in particular would react in that manner because they were raised to do shit on the internet and not in real life.
Now...
All of that having been said, I do have some suspicions in the back of my mind that MGTOW and movement misogyny may not be completely 100% kosher.
A case of our friends with the noses giving us a few guiding nudges in directions that some of us already want to go, which is how a lot of this mess has happened down through the centuries.
White men get a bad idea and Jews simply encourage it.
Now what brought this on was that I recently had pointed out to me an entire blog that seems to be devoted to nothing but attacking me personally on the grounds that I am too sympathetic to women in my Northwest novels.
Now, that doesn't bother me, but...
This blog was put up by an internet pseudonym whom I'm familiar with, who tried to get really buddy-buddy with me some years ago online, but who I never fully trusted because there were just some inconsistencies in his story.
All kinds of fascinating reasons why he just couldn't possibly give me any information about himself that could be checked and who I eventually decided was some kind of weird internet infiltration attempt.
Now, I won't get into details because that would be feeding a troll and also because, as with a lot of internet gibberish, I might be wrong and this guy might just be a harmless eccentric.
But I see certain other signs that our distaste for the women of our own race is being shaped and guided from elsewhere, put it that way.
And, more disturbingly, I have now run into at least two examples of movement queers claiming that white nationalists must start fucking each other in the ass because it's the only sex we'll ever get, since white women are all such hypergamic bitches.
And if that isn't Jewish cognitive dissonance, I don't know what is.
Rule of thumb.
If the end result of something is that no white infants are born, it's Jewish in origin.
Secondly, I got another whine this week of, Oh, Harold, you're a con, man.
You don't ever do nothing.
You just tap on a computer all day.
Well, as some of you know, I'm desperately trying to change that, and the fact is that we've hit the wall where I have to get some help or...
Anyway, we won't get into that.
But what this guy means, I eventually figured out, is he's got a variation on the Harold charging the blockhouse fantasy going on.
That's where I'm supposed to cause my mighty army to spring up from the earth behind me like Hydra's teeth, and then I jump up on a picnic table and yell, Charge!
Charge the blockhouse!
And lead that charge with my cape flapping in the wind and waving my cane in the air, which I would sell my soul to be able to do, but which I can't.
I've explained to some of you exactly what I can do at present with the resources I've been given to work with, and precisely what concrete and material assistance I need from you guys in order to take this thing off the internet and back into the real world.
The Northwest Front is still inching in that direction, but it is slow, slow, so deathly, deathly slow.
And right now, unless we can speed things up somehow, the whole ball of wax is going to implode before we can get there.
But enough of that.
The specific issue is why I don't run around in public in some kind of odd garb with a tiny band of followers and wave signs and jump up and down and scream, Over here!
Look at me!
Look at me!
to the TV cameras.
Or at least the internet cameras and phones in order to provide you guys with entertainment.
The overwhelming majority of those who want to see me jumping up and down in public on CNN or YouTube, waving a sign or waving my dick in the air, make it clear that they have no intention whatsoever of doing this themselves.
They just want to watch other guys do it, for which, in theory, they agree to pay fairly small amounts of money, kind of like the cover charge and two-drink minimum at a strip bar.
Okay, let me take another run at this.
What we're talking about is our own form of LARPing, live-action role-playing, wherein a tiny number of guys pretend that the year is 1932 and we're somewhere in Europe.
The trouble is, we're not.
Now, we saw in Charlottesville what happens if ever we succeed in getting enough men to turn out to do this impressively.
Charlottesville scared the power structure silly.
And we now have a living demonstration as to how they will react if ever we get within shouting distance of really upsetting any of their apple carts.
I need to explain to you the concept of what's known in law enforcement as a lifestyle bust.
Some of you may be familiar with Dr. Hunter S. Thompson, the founder of Gonzo Journalism.
I'm running long here, so I'm not going to go off into a long digression on fear and loathing, but when Hunter Thompson's house in Aspen, Colorado, was being searched by sheriff's deputies for 12 hours, On a complaint from a bogus female journalist that Thompson had allegedly molested her or harassed her in some way, one of the deputies told him, quote, This is a lifestyle bust.
We are going to bring you into the system, unquote.
That's where the beast wants us all.
In the system.
Not even necessarily in prison, but on the court docket.
On bail, which can be revoked if you step out of line.
On probation.
On parole.
Shoveling every spare penny you can into the insatiable gob of lawyers.
Blacklisted from employment because your background check will always turn up some bullshit legal beef from years ago that you'll have to explain away.
Always made to pay for one single act of defiance against Zion, which you committed when you were 19 or 20, and which inflicted no damage at all on the enemy, not one single casualty.
And the only one hurt was yourself.
Look, you don't even have to LARP or run around in public making a fool of yourself in order to get crippled by enemy lawfare.
Some of you know what was done to Tom Metzger, Pastor Butler, J.W. Ferens, Glenn Miller, and others, including me personally, just for words or allegedly being seen at the wrong place and at the wrong time with the wrong person.
Guilt by association.
In my case, it was because I dared to question the official version of what happened in Oklahoma City back in the Clinton era, and I'm still under a federal court order right now which prevents me from discussing that event and what I know happened there.
For some years now, I've been explaining to you guys exactly what we need to do and how we need to do it in order to secure the existence of our people in the future for white children.
I even wrote an official manual, the White Book, explaining all this, so that when you get the urge to run around on public property looking and acting like a fool, you can't say there was no alternative.
Tell you what, I will even give it another shot.
Email me at nwnet, that's n-w-n-e-t at earthlink.net, and I will send you a free PDF copy of the White Book.
In which I will show you exactly how we can all charge the blockhouse and capture it.
But our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, WA 98310.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington.
And I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sarsha Underbond.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection