Jan. 25, 2018 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
59:02
20180125_rfn
|
Time
Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Push your vocal, push and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the bikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the bikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
Run for roar for signal, token whistle, up the marching tune.
Warrior pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
Switch your pike upon your shoulder.
Many a mud-walled cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a man's chest was throbbing for the blessed warming light.
Warpers passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's January the 25th, 2018.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, got some security-related things I want to kick off with this week.
Now, some of you may be familiar with a group called the League of the South, run by a man named Dr. Michael Hill.
The League of the South has been around almost 20 years, if memory serves.
Now, I don't know that much about it because I left the South to come home back in 2002.
The SPLC and the Soros crowd claim that the League of the South are quote-unquote neo-Confederate Southern nationalists and racists.
Now, I checked out their site, and from what I can see, they're just basically a bunch of middle-class and middle-aged to elderly Civil War and Confederate history buffs who like the Confederate flag and like to feel close to our ancestors who were real men instead of pale males as we are today.
These League of the South people frankly seem to me to be striking what they think is some kind of militant pose, but they don't quite pull it off.
Very few white Americans can pull off the appearance of genuine radicals or revolutionaries.
It's not in our genetic makeup anymore.
We don't breed Thomas Paine's or Edmund Ruffin's or Eugene Debs's anymore.
I suspect the League of the South has gotten a lot of these Civil War re-enactor types who spend $25,000 on reproduction uniforms and clothing.
Muzzle loaders, cap and ball firearms, period field equipment like canteens and such, with the wealthier hobbyists in some cases actually maintaining horses and stables to operate a reenactment cavalry unit.
And to be fair, this is not just a southern fad.
There are a lot of northerners who are into it as well.
There's as many Union reenactors as Confederates as these jamborees they have up at Manassas and Gettysburg and whatnot.
Their rhetoric is very mild indeed, almost no racial references at all, and what there are of racial references is when the League of the South is trying to claim that the Civil War wasn't about race, which is only partly true.
It was about race and economics combined.
Certainly, no desire to reassert Confederate law and nationhood is present anywhere I can find in any of the League of the South literature.
Frankly, these people seem pretty harmless.
Kind of like Southern John Birchers, if anybody still gets that reference.
As far as I can tell, they mostly just whine about the Confederate flag and Confederate monuments being desecrated and try and convince everybody that they're not racist because being a racist isn't nice and they don't understand that not thinking the way they're told isn't allowed and the Yankees and the Jews get to call them whatever they want to because they're better than we are.
In their personal politics, most of them are probably solid Republican voters, which, of course, in the eyes of Sauron, definitely makes them enemies of the people, blah blah blah.
The real problem most of the liberal crowd has with Southerners is that we stopped voting Democrat a few generations back.
Back when we were voting in Lyndon Johnson and Jimmy Carter, we were kind of cool.
Remember Billy Beer and Redneck Chic, anybody?
Anyway, what all this is innate of.
Last week, some Antifa group or other hacked into the League of the South's computer and stole their mailing list, which is now apparently being published all over the web with names and addresses.
This has caused all kinds of squeals and hollers on the internet from self-appointed movement experts, shrieking that none of us must ever maintain a list of any kind lest it be stolen by the bad people and others might find out who we are.
Oh, horrors!
Oh, calamity!
You get the idea.
In other words, we need to run even further away than we are now from any attempt at serious party professionalization, any pretense that our groups are actually organizations, and nothing more than a bunch of guys on Twitter and Facebook hiding behind female names in Japanese anime avatars.
Episodes like this and the widespread panic and terror they cause are in fact one reason why we've avoided professionalization for so many years.
For many of us, the primary consideration in our racial involvement, such as it has been, is that, come what may, we must be able to continue to hide, lest others find out that we are not of the body.
And the bad men and lawyers come to our homes and commit the ultimate atrocity they might take our stuff, threaten a white man's stuff, and he'll fold like a lawn chair.
Okay, since the Northwest Front sends out its most sensitive material in the old-fashioned way, so we won't be quote-unquote monitored by the assorted net nasties, and what with me not having a photographic memory, yes, we have a mailing list.
It is as secure as such a thing can possibly be, and it's protected by certain security precautions regarding which I will provide no details.
Yes, it could be stolen, but if that occurred, it would almost certainly be by direct seizure in a police or FBI raid.
Not hacking.
The people who stole it might not even figure out what they were looking at for a while.
However, the chance that our list might be stolen always exists, yes.
Down through the years, I've lost my mailing list twice.
Both times in the 1980s, and both times it was physically stolen by people I trusted.
Once out of my desk drawer in my apartment in Raleigh, and once out of a safe deposit box.
In neither case did anyone on the list suffer any lasting ill effects.
They just got some unsolicited mail, which they tossed in the waste paper basket.
Although, to be sure, this was in pre-internet days, and the situation was a little bit different.
So, a few remarks.
A. For our own mailing list, a pseudonym and a mail drop address at a UPS store or post office box is perfectly acceptable.
Just make sure it's a name and address where the post office will deliver mail.
And no.
They will not deliver to just Joe or Sam or Veronica or to Arian Frogman.
Pick a pseudonym that sounds realistic, not Horst Eichmann or anything ridiculous like that.
B. Be aware before you become involved and always remember, what we do is dangerous.
The very second that you type in an N-word anywhere on the internet and you click send and you send in an email, whatever, you post it to a comment section, you have been picked up by assorted computer algorithms and packet-sniffing software and every other darn thing that the secret police use to track and monitor people whose minds are not under control.
If you have ever so much as whispered anything remotely politically incorrect on the internet, you're in a database somewhere.
Now, you need to wrap your mind around that.
There is no safe way to dabble in white resistance politics.
Once you're involved in the eyes of the enemy, you are involved for life and there's no going back.
A lot of people come into this thinking that they're going to find themselves a nice, safe little hobby that they'll be able to use to salve their consciences with, but if the going ever gets too rough, they can shout, no, no, stop the merry-go-round, I want to get off.
Well, it doesn't work like that.
Our enemies are evil people who will do us harm in any way they can, and you need to accept that or just run away in fear and cower in your little hole and don't get involved at all.
Choose.
Let's face it, people who are too terrified even to be on a mailing list aren't likely to be the kind of people the coming times will demand if our race is to continue to exist.
Okay, next up, some more crystal ball gazing, which I don't like, but I know you do.
Hello, Harold.
How are you?
It's Cameron from California, and I'm writing to let you know that I'm still here, and that while due to personal reasons that are very common for us white boys living in the Talmudic Empire, I cannot come home at this time.
My fellow comrades and I are working on some plans to help the movement and you when we collectively move to the homeland.
Also, I would like your input on a question or concern that I have regarding a possible threat to the Republic before it can even get off the ground, since right now it looks like we will form our new state only after the...
collapse of the system and the Pacific Northwest will be one of the newly founded white states due to obvious demographics and growing trends, we need to address the big threat.
Conservatives.
What I fear is that under this new state, in a collapsed scenario, the conservatives will find them Conservatives.
And all of the assorted problems leading us back to square one, only to repeat the process again.
Simply put, how will we ensure that they never take power?
If they do, will we do our own Night of the Long Knives, or will the collapse shake them to the bone so that they will change too, or have their beliefs go the way of the dinosaur?
I'm asking you since I have a great amount of respect for you, and you have some real-world experience, unlike the fags and the alt-right, etc., etc.
Best wishes, Cameron.
You may recall that I got into these issues a little in A Mighty Fortress, but you want me to crystal ball gaze for you here and now.
Okay, off the top of my head.
Almost all of this crystal ball gazing depends on what the circumstances are of the Northwest Republic's birth.
How chaotic and bloody and violent will it be?
Or maybe not.
It's just conceivable that the impending breakup of the United States might come in some relatively peaceful and orderly form, like the breakup of the Soviet Union did.
Now I say...
Relatively peaceful, meaning that it won't degenerate into Mad Max.
The breakup of the Soviet Union was by no means completely peaceful, but at least the whole thing didn't come crashing down into pieces and the various parts of the empire more or less survived politically and culturally intact.
That might happen here.
Maybe.
I think some form of my NVA situation, which I portray in my Northwest novels, is the most likely.
But in any case, who ends up on top of the Northwest Republic heat will depend on a lot of factors.
Most importantly, whether or not we can get our act together and professionalize the Northwest Front, get organized to the point where the party serves as the genuine vanguard of the revolution like it's supposed to do.
There will probably be an old-fashioned contingent of red, white, and blue conservatism involved in the events leading up to Northwest Independence.
What that element will consist of, I hesitate to guess.
Probably the remnants of the Trump Mega Movement, after that movement has been betrayed in some spectacular way by the Republican Party through the impeachment or overthrow of President Trump and some spineless agreement to hand power back to the Democrats.
Maybe even the Hilda Beast herself, but most likely this high yellow she-boon Kamala Harris, the female Obama.
Now, the best way to make sure that conservatives don't quote-unquote take over the Northwest Republic is to make sure that the Northwest Front, the party, fulfills its function and leads the revolution, either politically and legally or otherwise, and not just participates.
At the very least, the party needs to be premature Paris, first among equals.
If history is in a guide, there will be a number of other right-wing tendencies involved in the Northwest Independence Movement.
Christian identity and Christian fundamentalists of all kinds of sorts, including, for some reason, a lot of Eastern Orthodox, I think.
There will be one issue white people like Second Amendment and pro-life and income tax rebels who just want the IRS gone, national socialists like myself.
People who are just anti-immigrant and tired of all the goddamn foreigners and want to be able to go into a Walmart that doesn't look and sound like a souk in Istanbul, and 50 other shades of white.
This will include some people whom I might describe as beaver cleaver conservatives who just want to bring back some idealized version of the past.
The 1950s, the 1970s maybe, or hell, some of these alt-right faggots and perverts actually seem to be nostalgic for the 1990s of all the bizarre things.
Anyway, the party has to provide not just a broad tent, but a unifying moral authority for all these tendencies.
The Irish Civil War ended up being fought over two ideological points which were crucially important to die-hard Irish Republicans.
The Oath to the Crown, which was to be taken by members of Doyle Arryn, And the partition of the island into northern Protestant and southern Catholic nations, which was actually a very fair and common sense approach.
But, as in so many human affairs, fair and common sense didn't make it through the scrum.
Whoever brings independence about needs to make sure that the revolutionary movement remains united and that no basic primal compromises are made which dilute or derail the essential objective of a free and sovereign white nation as a homeland for all our people worldwide.
Specifically, a free and sovereign republic, not some kind of white-ish Puerto Rico with the Masonic dishrag still flying over the post offices and with American military bases and armed non-white military still on our soil.
We're fighting for freedom, not a couple extra seats in Congress.
That's basically what happened with the Good Friday Agreement in Ireland.
Jerry Adams and Martin McGinnis and the Sinn Féin crowd sold out in exchange for seats in about four or five government legislatures and bodies apiece, drawing four or five paychecks from them all, which is legal in Europe, with chauffeur-driven Mercedes and free drinks at the Westminster bar, so forth and so on.
Now, that can't happen when this country comes to be born.
I know that doesn't answer your question in huge depth, Cameron, but do you begin to get a glimmer?
This is Schooner Fair.
*Music*
I am a little beggar and a beggar I appeal.
For three score or four in the suit, the light of green.
I know from the Liffin down to Suki, it's an old by the name of old Johnny Do.
Of all the trips are going, now shebeking is the best.
Oh, and a man is tired, he can lay him down a rest.
He paid for a supper, for there's nothing else to do.
I was around the corner with this old rig-a-doo Slept in the park, went down to Clarabond I went and come on, so I slept until the dawn There were holes in the roof and the rain had turned through And the cats and the rats, they were playing peek-a-boo Well, who should have waited but the woman of the house With a wince party and pretend like a little louse She began to frighten, and I said, Boo, I don't be afraid, but it's silly Johnny-Doo
Oh, my God.
I met a little faxie-haired girl one day Come on a little faxie-haired girl, I can say Come on a little beggar man, how do you do With your rags and your tags and your old rig-a-doo?
Buy a pair of legs, now a collar and a tie A pumpkin lady I will fetch my body Buy a pair of garters, I call her the blue That old-fashioned lady I'll make her too Over the row with the pack on the back Over the fields in the great heavy sack The hose and the shoes and my toes are peeking through It's a skidding-bring-a-doodle
now, it's only time to Must be going to bed for a skidding leg at night The fire's all rigged and out goes the light So now you've heard the story of the old rink-a-doo It's goodbye, got me with you, said old Johnny Deo Hey, a little thank
you, man, a thank you, Ryan, you did But at least more or more, in a silver-lighted green I don't know if it's down It's a skidding-bring-a-doodle now, the name of old Johnny Deo Of all the treats of going
on, she's begging is the best Though any man is tired, he can lay him down to rest So he can beg for a supper, but there's nothing else to do So go around the corner with this old rink-a-doo Thank
you.
Now, we're going to briefly revisit the whole MGTOW and white racial misogyny scene, because that's one of those issues that just keeps turning up like a bad penny.
I've spoken in the past on this show about our movement's problems with both feminism and misogyny, which, obviously, if they continue, will lead to our racial extinction even more surely than the replacement migration and the buggery and the enforced brainwashing and political correctness will.
I've said that I wish there was some way that the white men and women of the world could come together in a kind of big place like entirely too many of us behave.
I use the phrase adolescents of all ages to describe our little slice of life, and it's pretty apropos.
A normal woman wants a husband and children.
She does not want several small children and one large one that she has to take care of on her own.
And I get that, even if a lot of you guys out there don't.
I'll say it again.
Both white genders have legitimate complaints about the behavior and the attitude of the opposite sex.
This guy talking ape takes it a little too far, in my opinion.
See if you can spot what's wrong with what he's saying here.
The End
I suppose I'll be, in this instance, repeating myself to a certain degree and repeating things that both Barbaros and I have said in the past, but this video I wanted to make, or have been wanting to make for a while, because I just noticed this ongoing trend in the so-called manosphere, a term I dislike, but I can find at the moment no better substitute for it.
Now, a couple of weeks ago, I was on Fakebook and I saw this anti-feminism, one of these threads.
It was a bunch of guys, supposedly, I don't know what they were, traditionalists, MGTOW, whatever, arguing back and forth with women.
And eventually, a comment section blew up and turned into an exchange of well over 300 comments back and forth.
And I tried to actually intervene.
I said, why are you wasting your time?
Why are you arguing with these women slash feminists?
It is a waste of time.
But I actually see this theme as being recurrent.
So let me enjoin you to remind yourselves of one of Girl Writes What's older videos, back when she made videos.
And she said, in a sense, I'm paraphrasing here, that feminism effectively is the women's biggest shit test ever.
And I would be inclined to agree with that.
And I'd also be inclined to say that we've identified, I believe correctly, that feminism in large measure is simply human female biology made manifest into a political organization, organism, whatever.
We all know that men hop about paying attention to the needs and wants of women.
I'm here to say, again, because it needs to be said again, that you need to stop paying attention to women.
Stop arguing with them.
Stop talking to them.
Don't argue with women, women feminists, whatever.
It's a waste of time.
And let me tell you why it's a waste of time.
Feminism would not have come about if men had not, for a better part of their existence on this earth, constantly paid attention to the needs and wants and whinging and desires of women.
The nagging principle, right?
I mean, what is feminism but in some sense a giant nag?
They're nagging the world and particularly men to pay attention to their demands.
The men had ignored the wants and clamor and noise that women had made during the primal years of feminism.
We wouldn't be in this mess, possibly.
Possibly, we would.
But the point I'm trying to make is just that feminism came about because people paid attention to what the women were saying and what feminism was saying.
It doesn't do anyone any good to argue back and forth with feminists or women.
Remember?
The entirety of gynocentric power lies in the fact that the world pays attention to women when they complain, when they want something, when there's an issue, and so on and so forth.
This is the base of their power.
You can cut that off by effectively not engaging with them.
Now, look, there are pressing issues, of course.
You know, the White Ribbon Campaign or whatever.
You know, the White Ribbon Campaign, which effectively declares, you know, all men are violent criminals, rapists, so on and so forth.
Okay.
Fair enough.
Maybe you're inclined, particularly as an MRA, to combat that, to argue back and forth.
It's never going to get through.
You're arguing against human biology.
You're arguing against female human biology, and you're arguing against the fact that most men are not going to help you out with your arguments.
They're just going to get in the line and get in the queue and toe the line.
That's the way men are.
Men exist to serve, and women exist to receive.
The best defense against an organization such as, or campaigns such as the White Ribbon Campaign, or any of the things that feminists tend to do, is to withdraw and to not pay them any attention the time of day.
They want to call men rapists and violent and this and that, but let them, you know.
In fact, I'll tell you that I'm not interested in talking to women and engaging with them.
Just show them that you're not interested in having anything to do with them.
You know, you don't want to rape them.
You don't even want to talk to them.
You don't want anything to do with them.
You know, this, I see, ultimately, is a much better solution than constantly bickering with women back and forth.
I mean, maybe some of these guys, my impression was they were quite young, get off on it, but it is a waste of time arguing back and forth with women.
It really is, and particularly with feminists.
Maybe it's good if you want to get attention.
But my question is, why are you still, you, and I'm using a generic you as in you encompassing people, why are you still arguing with feminists and women?
You're arguing against female biology, effectively.
It's a waste of time.
And the best thing you can do to change the status quo, if it's possible at all, is to stop paying attention to it.
Men paid too much attention to what women wanted in the past.
That's how we ended up in large measure in the mess we are right now.
They continue to do so, and that's how we get Anita Sarkeesian.
Do you think the majority of the donors to Anita Sarkeesian were female?
I think not.
I'm willing to bet money that most of them were male.
Men pay way too much attention to what women want, and if it's correct in a sense that feminism is a giant collective shit test, well, it's best to not play into it and play along with it.
Stop paying attention.
Arguing back and forth is not going to change anything.
In fact, I'm willing to make a prediction that 10 years from now, if I'm still alive, we're also alive, applying that principle will have gotten us just as far as we are now, which is effectively nowhere.
Waste of time.
I'm not interested in arguing with women and talking to women and engaging with women.
I'm certainly not interested in beating women.
I'm not interested in having sex with women.
I'm not interested in raping women.
I want nothing to do with women.
And this, it seems to me...
Extreme and radical, as it might sound, is a far more sensible policy than arguing back and forth.
You are feeding the fire.
You're adding fuel to the fire.
You're feeding the beast.
You're acknowledging, in part, the validity of their claims by arguing with them.
If you turn your back on them, you're acknowledging nothing.
In fact, in this sense, they effectively become non-entities.
People, whether men or women, who advocate silly things such as, you know, most men are rapists or whatever.
They deserve to have their backs turned on.
There's no reason to engage with them.
They're not interested in a rational discussion.
They're not offering on their ends a rational discourse.
You turn your back and you leave.
What could be simpler than that?
Arguing back and forth is a waste of time.
And many of us had learned this a long time ago, but I think this lesson has been lost to many people in the so-called manosphere.
It's also why I think the MRA is, I mean, we know the MRA has accomplished, which is effectively next to nothing.
Part of it is because the idea of forming a coalition of men for the sake of men's rights when men in general, most men, don't look out for each other, don't give a shit about each other, and would much rather curry the favor of women on the whole than team up for the sake of men.
They have this organization and they're arguing back and forth with feminists about stats and whatever.
An argument, a rational discussion is only valuable.
Or rather, a discussion is only valuable if both people are rational, both people are interested in the evidence, or both ends of the discussion, people on the ends of the discussion are interested in the possibility of change in their minds.
I don't see feminism radical or otherwise interested in that.
I don't even see most women as being interested in that.
Women, well, people in general, but women even more so are much less interested in the truth and what makes them feel good about things.
So, waste of time arguing back and forth.
And like I said, I'll repeat it.
If you're a feminist or you're a woman, generally speaking, and I make individual exceptions, of course, but regarding these issues, I'm not only not interested in raping and beating you, I don't want to talk to you, I don't want to engage with you, I want nothing to do with you, period.
And this applies, unfortunately, to the vast majority of people.
But specifically the vast majority of women out there who fall in line with feminist ideology.
And they do so because feminist ideology is female biology made manifest in reality.
It has been talked about ad nauseum.
I'm not going to repeat it again and again.
But here, this has been shown, demonstrated.
Bart Russell's made videos.
I've made videos.
You're arguing with something that just, you can't change it.
A much better plan.
And these are my final thoughts, is to not engage with the pain.
Paying too much attention to women, at least in part, got us to where we are right now.
Listening to their every complaint, their shenanigans, their criticisms.
Where's the gotten men collectively as the other half of the human species?
I'm not very far.
And this is why things such as the MRA and the like are just doomed enterprises from the get-go.
They're arguing against human biology, and there are people they're arguing with aren't interested in facts.
Far, far better strategy.
It might sound nihilistic, as some people like to claim, but it's just turn your back on the whole thing and turn your back on that system in particular.
The system of engaging in discourse, which is not actual discourse, but rather disputes, fights with women and feminists, online or otherwise.
Pretty, pretty pointless, I think, and a waste of energy.
Better come up with some original ideas for individual men to improve their lives than to argue back and forth with feminists and women in general.
We got in the mess that we got into because we paid too much attention to women.
It's time to stop paying attention to women and to stop paying attention to women at all.
I mean, just cold turkey.
Don't talk to them unless you have to.
Just don't engage with them.
There's no point, at least on these issues.
If they want to talk about something unrelated to that, I'll talk to women.
But when it comes to these issues, there's no point.
We know how it's going to turn out 99% of the time.
Waste of fucking time.
Don't do it.
So I'll repeat one last time.
We got into this mess that we're in now on a global level by paying attention, way too much attention, to women's wants, complaints, needs, clamoring, so on and so forth.
And the best solution to that is to do the opposite and stop paying attention.
Stop arguing with women.
Stop paying attention to women and feminists or otherwise when it comes to these issues.
Just leave it all behind and go your own way.
And yeah, I think MRIs should go their own way too because they're wasting their time and energy doing it too.
Anyway, that's all I have to say about that topic.
And I've just, just begun the first smidgen of my next video.
Big, big video.
So who knows how long that'll take.
Until the next time, may the gods, as always, watch over you.
Bye-bye.
Okay, the first thing I'm sure you noted in Talking Apes Little Philippic, the words race and white are not uttered in there once.
Misogyny among white men and feminism among white women are racial and political issues and should be addressed as such.
Secondly, if white men follow his advice and simply ignore white women and pretend they don't exist, how does the next generation of white people come into existence?
Where will these men who are ignoring their own women turn?
When their simple bodily desires need to be satisfied?
Women of color, like Andrew Anglin?
Sex dolls?
Will they bugger one another in the butt like modern society and culture urges us to do?
Whatever obscene substitute MGTOW men find for themselves, it will not lead to the birth of white infants.
That's why somehow this gender war thing has to be settled.
Bringing the next generation of white fathers and mothers together and bringing white babies into the world is not something that can be put off.
There is a biological and demographic clock ticking.
Whatever your problems, if you are young enough to begin a family, especially if you're female, you need to understand that that's just as much a part of your racial duty as anything the NVA ever did in any of my novels.
Now, having said that, here's Lord Lucan with some misogyny and Islamophobia together.
I really hope our social justice warrior friends are listening to this one.
That combination will really flip them out.
I have never understood, by the way, how modern feminists could ever want to have anything to do with Islam.
And I am really freaked out by this spectacle of all these feminists having pictures of themselves on the internet wearing hijabs, some made out of American flags.
I mean, that's just nutty.
I actually have a certain amount of respect for the achievements of ancient Islamic cultures, etc., etc., but nobody in his right mind wants to live like that.
What do these feminists and these homos and whatnot on the left think is going to happen to them?
When the Muslims take over.
Anyway, here's his lordship.
Outro Music.
To Sweden and Europe According to Queen Victoria, votes for women will become a disaster.
The invasion of Europe by Islam has become a disaster.
This is because women have the vote.
Women do not think the same as men.
The policies of appeasement and surrender to the bullying religion of Islam are the work of women.
Men, on the other hand, do not surrender to bullies.
But because women are the majority, together with the Muslims that vote, the possibility of those that oppose Islam to win at elections does not exist.
Because there is no possibility of defeating Islam at elections, the only way left for men to defeat Islam is through guerrilla war.
Let me remind you of what the Apostle Paul said in his letters.
I do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence.
The reason he gives for such a rule is that because Eve was deceived in the Garden of Eden to eat the forbidden fruit, the women are therefore more gullible and therefore more willing to believe the lie that Islam is a religion of peace.
I am therefore suggesting that Sweden is ready for civil war.
The most logical place to start eradicating Islam would be in the north of Sweden.
Now, the most successful guerrilla war leader was Chairman Mayer, and he gave certain rules that you must follow in order to be successful.
The five requirements for victory are 1. Support from the masses 2. Party organization 3. Strong guerrilla army 4. Favorable region for military moves 5. Economic self-sufficiency Now, fighting a guerrilla war means no longer living in your house or even driving your car.
It means living outside.
So preparing underground bases is the first requirement.
Guerrilla war also means fighting at night.
Remember, the USA was defeated by the Vietnamese.
80% of Swedish policemen no longer want to be policemen.
So we do have the possibility of them to change sides and oppose the female policies of surrender and appeasement with Islam.
Also, if and when Islam is defeated in Sweden, votes for women will be abolished.
Islam has over a hundred verses in the Quran that call for the murder of all unbelievers.
Therefore, anyone who believes in such doctrine deserves to be executed.
Do not be soft-hearted towards Islam.
It does not deserve kindness.
Remember, it has murdered more people than communism.
Over 270 million have been murdered by Islam.
You might be able to get arms from those who used to live under communism, such as Poland or Hungary.
The USA is a long, long way from Sweden.
You can also make your own weapons, such as the crossbow.
The bolt to a crossbow can be as effective as an armor-piercing bullet.
Remember also, Islam will kill all of you Swedes if you do not drive them out of Sweden.
This same message applies to you British.
You British are in the same position as the Swedes.
In America at Lexington, 75 British citizens died fighting against the government.
That was in 1775 in April.
The British Redcoats withdrew.
The survival of Western civilization will require the same sacrifice from the Swedes and the English.
The governments of both countries support the Islamic invasion, which will lead to the extermination of native Swedes and native Englishmen.
We have a martyr in this country who died in combat, trying to save the white race and Western civilization.
His name was Robert Matthews.
Here is a song that all patriots should sing before going into battle to save the white race, because some of us will be martyred by the government, just as our patriotic forefathers were martyred during the American Revolution.
Ye are able, said the Master, to be crucified with me.
Yes, the surly patriots answered, To the death we follow thee.
Lord, we are able, our spirits are thine.
Remould them, make us like the divine.
They gate ingredients, above us shall be, Beacon to guard to love and loyalty.
Music by Ben Thede Thank you.
I hadn't had anything German on here for a while.
This particular number, called Wir sind Geier's Schwarzehaufen, which loosely means we're the black riders of Florian Geier, Florian Geyer was a rebel leader during the 1525 Peasants' Revolt in Germany.
That's when the Germans really let it all hang out and went berserk, attacking castles and robbing rich merchants and basically slaughtering all the rich people and swilling all kinds of beer and burning whole cities to the ground.
Good times.
Florian Geyer actually was so famous in his day that later on an SS division was named after him, and the SS troopers used to sing this particular song.
Wir sind des Geiers schwarzer Haufen, hei ja oh oh, und wollen mit Tyrannen raufen, hei ja oh oh.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setz aufs Lusterdach den roten Arm.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setz aufs Lusterdach den roten Arm.
Als Adam grub und Eva schwann, Kyrie leis, wo war denn da der Edelmann, Kyrie leis?
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setz aufs Lusterdach den roten Arm.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setz aufs Lusterdach den roten Arm.
Uns führt der Florian Geyer an, trotz Acht und Bann.
Den Bundschuh führt er in der Fahne, Handhelm und Arm ist an.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setz aufs Lusterdach den roten Arm.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setz aufs Lusterdach den roten Arm.
Bei Weinsberg setzt es Rand und Stang, hei, ja, oh, ho.
Gar mancher über die Flinke sprang, hei, ja, oh, ho.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setz aufs Lusterdach den roten Arm.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setzt aufs Blosserdach den roten Hahn.
Geschlagen ziehen wir nach Haus, hei ja oh oh, unsere Enkel fechten's besser aus, hei ja oh oh.
Spieß voran, drauf und dran, setzt aufs Blosserdach den roten Hahn.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Beyond Good and Evil, which is an indulgence once again, of course, in my perpetual interest in Nietzsche.
I'm using this book as a segue into Camp of the Saints.
In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche makes a passing comment comparing Plato to Vedanta.
Of course, Vedanta, if you've ever heard of it, is translated The end of the Vedas.
And what they mean by that is that after one has studied Vedic philosophy, then one can move on to meditation and renunciation.
So I tend to view Vedanta as a kind of giving up.
And apparently Nietzsche...
He tends to see Vedanta as a kind of retreat into otherworldliness, similar to Platoism.
Nietzsche links this doctrine of Plato to the development of Christianity and the Jesuits and the Enlightenment.
And in this book...
Nietzsche wants to talk about what we often refer to as constructions of the truth.
And he talks about how a lot of this comes out of a place of preference.
To Nietzsche, these preferences are actually linked to temperament, which, according to Nietzsche, arises out of heredity.
Nietzsche is fascinated by the nature of the Germans.
And of course, to state the obvious, the Germans are right in the middle of Europe.
And so they fascinate Nietzsche because they seem to contain many subracial strains.
And also, too, the Germans, according to Nietzsche, Seem to always exist in either the past or the future.
They're never really in the here and now.
Two, Nietzsche in general is, of course, as I've said before, a student of words and the conditions of language.
And so he talks about the continuum of Indo-European philosophies.
Also, too, he talks about how there's only a very few objective individuals who really want to know actual truth.
And of those, there are many people who really decide against speaking the actual truth because they ultimately realize that very few people actually want the truth and that often by speaking the truth, one might actually come to grief.
Nietzsche talks a bit about religion in this book, and he notes that the northern races primarily have really no talent for religion, with the possible exception of the Celts.
Of course, for Nietzsche, as you might well guess, religion is only a means to an end, and a puritanical life is actually a means of self-perfection.
While Nietzsche seems to recommend very strongly this self-perfection, he also fears for those who undergo this because he realizes full well that after doing this, they might find that they do not fit very well into their environment.
And in fact, they might actually be less successful rather than more.
And so in this, we have to note...
Ultimately, that Nietzsche is not one for practicality per se.
Nietzsche is a fan of setting values rather than being mired in them.
And he is in particular concerned with places like France, England, also Russia, and Northern Germany, because he thinks they're drowning in a kind of self-righteousness that ultimately will not be good for them.
Now, of course, this list is something of a metapolitical foretaste of what is to come.
In the years, obviously, after Nietzsche was writing this book, as I read this book and take into account the influence of the many thoughts that Nietzsche puts into this work, I find myself examining the ways of the world and the attitudes of people, and I think about this notion of adulthood, and I come to the realization...
That an adult is merely someone who is no longer supervised and therefore their mistakes are not criticized and they can essentially tell any story that they want because there is no one in a position to truly contradict them or note their excesses.
Therefore, life is a canvas to do as they wish.
Now, at the end of this book, Nietzsche speaks of love, and he bluntly states that love is essentially something which is beyond good and evil.
Today, essentially, everyone is obsessed with following the path of a good nature and a notion of being judged and watched.
And therefore, we are in a position of being, in some sense, mere children.
And of course, we do not come out of this state until we can get out of that type of social construct and mindset.
And if you look at life critically, I'm sure you'll see examples of this in your own life.
So, obviously the reason that I'm using Beyond Good and Evil as a segue into Camp of the Saints is because, in my opinion, and I'm hardly alone in this, one of the ways to counteract this notion of pathological altruism is with a heavy dose of Nietzschean philosophy.
So, I thank you very much for listening, and again I've been discussing...
Beyond Good and Evil.
So have a good evening and hail victory, comrades.
So have a good evening.
Thank you.
Okay, now I want to talk about a very sensitive subject indeed.
Price tag attacks.
This is another one of those cases where I'm going to have to choose my words with very great care because I know I'm being monitored and cataloged by assorted NGOs and I can kind of sense that at some point in the future anything I have to say on this topic will be thrown back at me.
Price tag attacks is a term I have openly and unashamedly stolen from the Jewish settlers on the West Bank, and it refers to the price tag that American society has to pay periodically for compelling white men to live under political correctness.
When some white kid or middle-aged man has finally had enough of being forced to swallow Salon and Huffington Post horseshit, he picks up a gun and he comes through the door smoking.
It's a price tag that the liberals themselves almost never pay.
The dead are almost always street niggers or Sikhs with funny turbans who clearly don't belong on this continent at all, or wogs who stole a parking place for the umpteenth time, or white women who insulted the white man, concerned in some particularly humiliating way, something personal like that.
Every now and then there are exceptions.
Seems to me, a few years ago, some judge in Texas who had fucked a white man over particularly bad got hit outside the courthouse, with the shooter, of course, being immediately tracked down and killed as well, or else killing himself, I can't remember now.
But the people who are the driving engines in this toilet, the everyday liberals in the carpeted, air-conditioned offices, with petty power over other people's lives, with the government or George Soros paychecks, Those individuals almost never actually pay the price tag for their behavior and the way they live and for what they're doing to the rest of us.
A lot of liberal power in this country, hell, in the Western world, is based on their personal, physical immunity from any consequences at all for their behavior.
Now, the people who get killed in price tag attacks are basically bystanders of a sort, if not necessarily completely innocent bystanders.
The low-level liberals themselves always pirouette away untouched, like Tinkerbell.
Until 2017.
The two cases of price tag attacks I want to rap to you about today are Jeremy Christian in Portland and a 17-year-old kid named Nick Giampa in Reston, Virginia.
Christian is awaiting trial, and Giampa may be dead, or he may not be.
I saw one article from the SPLC stating that he was dead because he shot himself afterward, but I can't find any confirmation at all of that on the internet.
The whole story just seems to have vanished.
The latest reference of any kind I can find to the Giampa case is January the 4th, when the boy was finally publicly identified.
And then for three weeks, nothing.
It seems to have been flushed down the memory hole since then.
For a variety of pragmatic reasons, I won't discuss these individual cases in detail.
I'll let you guys Google them.
Let's be crystal clear.
For the record, I do not applaud or approve of what either of these guys did.
By definition, it was self-destructive.
Literally, it destroyed them.
And we really need to stop doing self-destructive crap.
Besides, neither of them accomplished any real change in the biopolitical situation on this continent.
They say price tag attackers are our version of suicide bombers.
Well, we don't need suicide bombers.
We need Michael Collins, not Dylann Roof.
Okay, all of that having been said, I think it'll be possible for future historians, if there are any left to right history, to record these incidents as for real acts of significant resistance due to the possibly paradigm-shifting target selection, the biggest area where our suicidal dumbasses have always fallen down.
For the first time, most likely by accident, the concept of the high-value target seems to be making its appearance.
We'll have to see if this is a trend and if it continues.
Okay, these are not solo headbag-style paradigm shifters, and I don't have the time to explain to you what solo headbag was, so you'll have to Google that as well.
Jeremy Christian can be said to have acted in self-defense, although his case is complicated by what may be a genuine psychiatric condition.
If anything the mainstream media says can be believed, which is problematic, then it's possible this guy really does have a few screws loose.
With Nick Giampa, it looks like a case of m'dick m'dick, one of those examples where white males will commit really rambunctious deeds of direct action, but only for their own personal reasons.
Classic feeling and not thinking.
However, once we obtain state power and control our own media, and we can start beating the enemy's media people to death to lower their volumes so we can be heard, the Nick Giampa thing could be spun into a love story, depending on how the girl shakes out in court or in public.
Now, if she bawls and weeps and wrings her hands and renounces hate and all that belly wash, a great romance probably won't fly even when we're making the movies.
If she stays true, or at least stays silent, something might be made of it.
The significant thing here is that the quote-unquote victims were actually enemy targets of mid-level value, practicing left-wing liberals who deliberately interfered in a white man's life and tried to deny him his essential social equality.
Liberals who basically stepped up to these men and said, I'm better than you, and so I get to tell you what to do with your life, how you should live, and how you should behave.
And there's nothing that you can do about it, because we both know you're a pussy, and you don't have the balls.
Well, sometimes mental illness, or just plain dumb, seems to immunize a white boy from the social engineering and leave his basic instincts intact.
The lifetime of brainwashing never fully takes for whatever reason, and in an emotional crisis, his soul remembers who he is, even if he doesn't, and he raises his hand against an enemy, like the thousand generations who came before used to do.
Okay, now these cases didn't play out in those words, I get that, but that was the dynamic that was in play in both instances.
The thing I'm getting at is that these were not just street niggas or wogs stealing reserved parking spots.
You might say they were actual enemy foot soldiers, instead of scavengers following in their wake.
Lowly pawns on the board of political correctness, true, but at least they were on the board.
Now, here's where it gets tricky.
Let me make some purely speculative observations on these incidents.
In 2017, for the first time in donkey's years, Some small element of risk attached to being a liberal or progressive or SJW or Antifa or Democrat or General George Soros flack.
There was at least some remote chance that what slopped out of their filthy gobs might have consequences in the real world.
Yeah, yeah, I know.
Both these cases are very problematic.
They are nowhere near Michael Collins or Dan Breen's stature, but we don't seem capable of that yet.
So, we're stuck with the funny little men who hear voices in their heads, or dumbass kids who think ten seconds ahead on a good day.
I really wish they wouldn't do this kind of thing and throw their lives away, but most of these people have no idea who I am, and they clearly are not into listening to anybody else.
They're too busy feeling and not thinking.
Now, suppose.
Just suppose for the sake of argument now.
Pure conjecture.
Certainly not trying to incite or suggest anything or violate the sacred law of our masters and mistresses.
Them what is so much better than me.
But just suppose that this became the norm rather than the exception.
Suppose it became for real, real world, dangerous.
To be a liberal or progressive or antifa asshole, or any of the political, bureaucratic, or enforcement flacks who enable the same and make the world safe for their filth and their soul-corroding poison.
Suppose certain things got done at night by mature, intelligent, on-the-ball white men who did not have their heads up their asses.
How do you think that would change the American paradigm, class?
But our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.