All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 9, 2017 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:00:49
20171109_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-woo, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the bikes will ski together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the bikes will ski together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token whistle, out the marching tune.
Warrior pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
Which survived upon your shore By the rising of the moon Out from many a mud-walled cavern eyes Welcome to my show!
She's lonely.
And a thousand flames were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
And a thousand flames were flashing at the rising of the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's November the 9th, 2017.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Right, things have calmed down here a little, and I have some more time to work with this week, so I'll probably start out on a major project or theme that I've been thinking about for a long time later on in the podcast.
We do have a fairly long segment from Gretchen this week on Madam Blavatsky.
And also some audio from the young British man who visited us here in Seattle a few weeks ago.
But don't worry, all you HIC addicts out there will get your fix this week.
Before that, though, there are a few loose ends I want to tie up that have been kind of hanging around for some weeks and months.
Now, some time ago, one of our listeners emailed and asked me to discuss this whole new liberal agenda item about so-called gender-neutral pronouns and their ramifications.
Wanted me to talk about what's being done in Sweden, where they're trying to implement this madness seriously, etc., etc.
Okay, for those of you who are not as up on the great politically correct agenda as you might be, there is a move afoot in almost all Western governments and universities in Europe, Canada, the United States to alter the language that white people use, be it English or Swedish or German or whatever, to eliminate what are referred to as sexist or gender-specific pronouns.
Specifically, any pronoun which identifies the sex of the person being referred to, i.e., he or she, him or her, his or hers, etc., etc.
These pronouns are to be replaced with plurals, such as they, them, theirs, etc., in English anyway.
I understand it's kind of the same in Swedish and German and French, so forth and so on, although I only speak broken German and French and no Swedish at all, so I can't really say.
So, instead of saying...
He is an experienced engineer.
You would say they are an experienced engineer.
Or possibly they is, which would not only be stupid, but grammatically incorrect, but the feminist bitches who dreamed up this idiocy don't care.
They probably all flew away on their own brooms.
Instead of saying she takes five freshman classes, you would say they take five freshman classes.
Instead of saying that's his pickup truck, you would say that's their pickup truck.
Instead of saying, those are her two children, you would say, those are their two children.
Instead of saying, give the package to him, you would say, give the package to them.
Instead of saying, I sent her an email, you would say, I sent them an email.
You get the idea.
Okay, now this has to do with language, a kind of 21st century version of George Orwell's Newspeak in the novel 1984.
And I suppose the first thing I need to do is to...
Refer you folks once again to the appendix in that novel on Newspeak and the use and abuse of language by totalitarian societies to restrict and control and narrow the range of thought.
Orwell was a genuine prophet.
This is what we've been seeing in the Western world for some time now.
Now let me choose my words carefully here so I don't go off into a ranting, raving tirade.
Rather than attempt to express my incandescent outrage that these liberal doo-doo birds could display such sheer arrogance as to attempt to destroy the language of Chaucer, Shakespeare, Milton, and the King James Bible,
rather than try to convey my excruciating shame and embarrassment that these people have yet To be beaten bloody and screaming to the ground for this vile and nauseating presumption of their own superiority?
Rather than try to convey my shame and humiliation at their so far correct assumption that they would be met with no resistance whatsoever while they try to impose this lunacy on all of mankind, I have to say that, frankly, I don't think they're going to get very far with this one.
Oh, they're trying.
I understand that the state of California is considering a law ordering that all official state correspondence and documents use politically correct pronouns, presumably to include such things as legislation, police reports, legal transcripts, state government forms, so forth and so on.
And that all future copies of state papers and volumes of California statutes and so forth be updated to reflect what is euphemistically called correct usage, what Orwell in 1984 referred to as definitive newspeak editions, yadda yadda yadda, that's all in the works.
Now this happy horse shit is happening elsewhere around the world as well, mostly in universities, but...
I understand some of the more lefty loon types in the California legislature are considering tacking on a 15-year prison term for quote-unquote deliberate misuse of gender-identifying pronouns in any official context, although no one is quite clear as yet as to exactly how that would work.
But, again, I say honestly, I don't think this one's going to fly for several reasons.
In the first place, these politically correct pronoun thing dummies Do not actually make sense, and attempts to use them in sentences will cause massive confusion as to what the hell people are talking about.
In the second place, due to the complete politicization and polarization of everything from top to bottom in English-speaking society, you're going to have about half the population, i.e.
the white half, that simply refuses to go along with this insanity.
Is Zaw going to lock up 150 million white people?
Don't answer that.
I'm actually kind of concerned about what they really will do when they try this CAC on any large scale, but seriously, enforcing it would require a total Orwellian surveillance state.
Telescreens and microphones everywhere, monitoring every conversation, on the lookout for he's and she's and his's and hers.
I don't question that these swine who rule us have the political will to create such a surveillance state.
After all, I've been trying to do that for years.
But do they have the technical capability to do so?
Especially with all the other problems they have to deal with, like keeping track of all these bearded Muslim loons they've let into the country who try to rent trucks.
I'll be very interested to see how this one plays out, but honestly, I think this one little item on the agenda is going to fizzle or just get lost in the shuffle of the general madness.
Okay, next up.
This is kind of an inside baseball thing, which I'm going to mention.
Our wee little movement has once again done what we do best, which is to provide endless case studies and examples of how not to do it.
There's this guy I'm going to be telling you about.
Don't be this guy.
I'm talking about the guy who wanders from racial group to racial group and meeting to meeting who will not shut up about illegal activity.
This came up a while ago here in the Northwest.
Tell you what, let me tell you a story, a true story.
There's this guy, this individual who has been hanging onto the fringes of the Northwest Front for almost 10 years.
His thing is he wants to meet with people.
A lot of people.
Anyone connected with the NF up close and personal, but especially he wants to meet with me.
I never have because the very first report I ever got about this individual was a bad one.
The first time I ever heard his name.
There was a meeting in Longview, Washington, which I did not attend myself, but some of our people did, where this guy, who apparently no one at the meeting knew from Adam's house cat, asked for the floor and made this long speech or tirade demanding that we immediately begin preparing for armed revolution, create the NVA, start stockpiling guns and ammo and explosives and training with explosives and full-auto weapons and mapping out local police stations so we could blow them up, so forth and so on.
Fortunately, the organizers, although not connected with ENF, were not total fools, and they asked this person rather firmly to leave the premises, which is exactly what they should have done.
Never, ever stay in the same room with someone who is running off at the mouth about guns and bombs and committing crimes.
You need to stand up.
Loudly state for the benefit of whatever recording devices are around that no, we are not going to do that and the person needs to be quiet on the subject and then leave the room.
Do not engage such people in conversation or debate because there's probably a funny little man with a funny little tape recorder under his jacket lurking somewhere in the woodwork and you don't want to give the FBI or DHS or whoever the audio sound of your voice in conversation with an informer.
To our friends in the silk suits, that is paydirt.
Second best for them is the recorded sound of your voice on the telephone.
That still gives them actual audio that they can edit and alter and use to fabricate evidence, as they did with Edgar Steele and numerous other cases.
A very sorry third, from their point of view, is email or social media posts, which are actually the easiest for them to forge or tamper with, but the problem is that most juries by now know that emails can be altered.
Twitter accounts can be hacked, and a phony IP address can be dummied up as quick as boiled asparagus.
It worked with Bill White in that they were able to send a political dissident to prison without him actually doing anything, but if that Bill White case ever does come under any kind of serious review, by any kind of unbiased or skeptical authority, it won't stand up to real scrutiny for five minutes.
And a lot of judicial and law enforcement careers are going to be toast.
I think the secret police understand that altering emails and playing computer games is too risky while there's any chance they might get caught out.
For whatever reason, either the Brandenburg versus Ohio Supreme Court decision or else bad optics or whatever, they don't seem to be prepared actually to arrest people for clearly politically intended speech or writing.
Not yet, anyway.
The Bill White business comes pretty close in that they used it to insert the deranged concept of the quote-unquote inherently criminal and violent audience into American law.
But like I've said, that Bill White case is so dodgy that they probably don't want to lean on it too much for precedent.
Now, if you will allow me a brief Grandpa Simpson moment, there has been so much paranoia down through the years about spies and infiltrators and agent provocateurs.
Including goat dancers and other idiots accusing me of that, that I'm very leery about leveling that particular accusation against anybody without some kind of morally persuasive evidence.
And I take a lot of persuading.
Most of these people aren't feds or SPLC spies or undercover journalists.
Like one of my mentors, the late Pam Emmerich, once says, you know, they're not Jews.
They're not undercover CIA agents.
They're not part of the world conspiracy.
These people are just trouble.
What they are is just plain and simple white dumbasses who have been driven a bit funny in the head over what Obama America has done to them, or else they're just too stupid to understand that what we do is dangerous, like handling dynamite for a living, and you need to be careful, alert, and on your guard all the time.
These infiltrations really do occur.
Of course they do.
In some cases, really horrific incidents where multiple innocent people go to prison.
I've talked about some of these things on here.
Happens every couple of years.
The things that go bump in the night really do exist.
But they're a lot more rare than we think.
And we overreact a lot.
There are those among us who are kind of like Tweak on South Park.
We think the FBI are hiding under the bed and putting microphones in the sugar bowl.
In point of fact, except in two cases, I have never outright accused anybody of being an undercover cop or federal agent or NGO provocateur.
Now, I may have had my suspicions, but I simply do not level that accusation against someone in public unless I know in my bones that something is going on which places us all in danger and not speaking could be lethal.
In one case, that of Bernard Butkovich, I was proven right.
He was an actual badge-carrying agent for the ATF and eventually responsible for the death of seven people, including his own.
The second case I'm forbidden to speak of by federal court order, but suffice it to say that pretty much everybody now acknowledges me to have been correct all along.
With that and $1.59, I can buy a small cup of watery coffee at McDonald's.
Okay, dragging myself kicking and screaming back onto the topic.
Unfortunately, the people in Longview seem to think that this Nimrod was some kind of official representative of the Northwest Front.
And I'm sorry to say that he has in past years either deliberately given people that impression or else allowed them to assume it.
Every time I have heard of this man meeting with somebody in if or otherwise, it's always the same thing.
Within ten minutes, he's babbling about guns and bombs and killing people.
This has been going on for ten years.
Ten years of this stuff now from this individual.
He keeps emailing me, and for a time I would politely respond to him because I never could figure out exactly what his scene is.
Now, I want to make it clear.
I do not and have never accused this particular individual of being some kind of enemy undercover or agent provocateur because after all these years, I don't think he is.
Frankly, if he was one of the FBI's $400 a week men, I think he would have given up long ago.
Either that, or he would have really made some kind of serious effort to get close, like trying to buy his way in or something like that.
I just think he's one of these very angry and frustrated white men who, like me, is sick and tired of bad people winning all the time.
And he wants to see the blood of his oppressors and enemies flow.
That is natural.
It is humanly understandable, and it is morally justified.
This man is right to ask that of the cosmos.
I get it, and I wish to God I could give him what he wants.
The reality of the situation is that I can't.
No one can.
Someday that might change.
In fact, it damn well better, but for now...
I must yet again tell him and all of you what I know you have come to hate hearing so badly that you probably scream out loud in rage when you hear these words, but the time is not yet.
We are not ready.
Until certain specific acts of heavy lifting have been carried out by serious, committed adults, we won't be ready.
All I can do is ask you to trust me and wait.
I think that's one of the reasons for the high turnover in all groups like ours, not just the Northwest Front.
You want someone who will make the blood of these bad, bad people flow.
Someone who will hurt them as they have so terribly hurt you.
Someone who will punish them for their inconceivable wickedness and depravity.
Someone who has the courage and the resources and the capability that you do not.
And not all of you are looky-loos.
I understand that many of you would be willing to fight and die yourselves if only someone could trot out an already finished product.
If the bandwagon was rolling down the street, most of you people, I'm sure, would jump on it.
Now, later on in this podcast, we'll be talking about getting that going.
For now, here's Gretchen.
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Helena P. Blodvatska and her book on comparative religion and esoteric occultism.
This book is entitled Isis Unveiled, and of course when she mentions Isis, she's talking about the Egyptian goddess.
This is a book that Harold sent me probably even five or six years ago, and I've looked through it at times, but I've always struggled with whether it had any actual relevance.
And I finally decided that, while tenuous, it would be interesting enough to read and discuss on this show.
This author points out a dilemma that many of us face.
Nowadays, most people are essentially Darwinists.
With Darwin, we have a more or less linear view of history.
I say more or less because, theoretically, certain features that have diminished in evolution could theoretically re-evolve.
But essentially the view of human history and indeed the history of most species vis-a-vis Darwinism is essentially one that is linear.
It is also true that more and more people these days are coming to embrace Dharma.
With Dharma, we have a cyclic view of history.
If you're able to compartmentalize these two ideas, it may not bother you too much, but you do have to realize, I suppose, that on the one hand being a Darwinist and on the other hand believing that we are in the Kali Yuga is something of a self-contradiction.
So the answer to this dilemma is essentially believing in a spiritual existence for hominids prior to a physical existence.
Now, of course, there's no way to verify this, but it's an interesting concept.
This author, of course, was writing at around the turn of the last century, and as we all know, that was a time of exploration and scientific advancement.
Of course, Christianity at that time remained popular, but for the educated, or the intellectual, or just the idle rich, It was no longer enough.
And of course, at around this time, because of that, there's a lot of dabbling in spiritualism.
And unfortunately, there were a lot of fraudsters that made out on this really popular trend.
But because these interests are more and more in the zeitgeist at that time, Blavatska writes this comprehensive overview.
Now, a really important idea in this book that, of course, influences the title is this idea that there was a group of people who came from India, who traveled to Egypt, and these people would eventually become the Ethiopians, according to this author.
Whether her anthropological viewpoints are correct or not, I'm willing to hold that in abeyance and just push forward.
These superior religious ideas coming from India were spread by the Chaldeans.
And according to Blavatska, Jesus was a Chaldean, as was Paul.
Now, this author also stresses that Jesus was influenced by the Essenes, but that he was not a pure Essene because he would anoint people with oil, which is something that the Essenes absolutely would not do.
According to this author, the driving force behind Jesus was the idea of pre-Vedic Brahmanism.
And she even goes so far as to call Jesus something of a Buddhist.
Now, this is not because the Buddha literally influenced Jesus.
Rather, this is because, like the Buddha, Jesus was drawing from this well of pre-Vedic Brahmanism.
You should understand that in Sanatana Dharma, the idea of pre-Vedic Brahmanism really does not make sense, because in the orthodox conception of Sanatana Dharma, the Vedas always exist, and they are a sound current that is in what we used to call the ether.
At any rate...
This author has many interesting and esoteric ideas about religion, and one of her ideas is this mystical doctrine that Jesus was actually incapable of death, and so he didn't actually die on the cross, but he actually used a proxy, someone by the name of Simon the Syrian.
We're also told about initiation in this book, which is also a very common theme.
And in terms of Christianity, the Book of Job is actually a thinly veiled book dealing with initiation.
One aspect of Christianity that this author struggles with is the notion of unconditional forgiveness of sins, because As the author very practically points out, the forgiveness of a sin does not mitigate the earthly damage of that sin.
To further this idea, or to mesh with this idea, the author concludes that everything that happens is a result of various cosmic laws.
In today's world, when we talk about magic, oftentimes we're talking about some clever parlor trick.
But what this book wants to really discuss is a notion of self-control, and ultimately this control becoming so pervasive that we're able to control the astral body.
Also, too, in this book, we have this idea of the secret word that prevents the loss of the astral body at death.
Also, too, this author talks about her experiences of something that one might call mind transference, when a spiritual essence transfers into a new body.
This author really wants to talk about the unity of all religions and philosophies, and she's really willing to look everywhere.
She even looks at the Masons, for example, and she looks at the Kabbalah.
She talks about one of the notions of God as...
Being free of all attributes.
But she distinguishes that notion from a notion of atheism.
And she talks about spirits and how higher spirits will tend to linger in upper realms, whereas the lower spirits, and we have to be careful of this, can unfortunately be closer to us.
This notion can lead to a specific idea of heaven, for example, but that's a little too specific or literal for this author.
And she goes into a lot of religious history.
She talks about how the Jesuits were really chased into different countries, very much like the Jews were.
And she talks about the traditions in Tibet and how they will only speculate on the active stages of Brahma.
Levanska believes in creation cycles, and she talks about what happens in the dissolution of creation at the end of a cycle.
She does seem to believe that various different ethnic groups, that they have different gifts.
Different spiritual gifts, but she seems to believe that everyone has some sort of a spiritual gift of one kind or another.
She places the spiritual advancements of India in very high esteem, but she's pessimistic about her audience, or what I assume is her audience, which I assume would be primarily white people reading this book.
She fears that whites in general are not good candidates for Vedic learning because they probably would not listen to Brahmins, for example, from India.
But still, she wants to unveil the truth.
To a certain extent, this author's belief that whites would not be adept to what we might call Krishna consciousness is overly pessimistic because we know that later on in history, particularly during the 60s, the degeneration of the West was essentially being broadcast into the zeitgeist.
And we know...
There were various gurus from India, such as Prabhupada and others, that ultimately come in to help.
And, of course, nowadays we have the Archera Parvataka.
And I've talked about his work on this show, The White Guru.
Of course, we can always question who might come after him.
It's true that we have not seen as yet Massive dharmic conversion, although we have seen the Española Sikh community as well coming about.
And granted, some of those converts are Jewish, but I'm sure they have a lot of white converts as well.
I've come to realize that this is a more interesting book than I initially thought.
But I would caution readers that clearly this author is not particularly focused on any one goal in the same sense that Savitri Devi, for example, is focused.
Reading this book could cause, I suppose, some degree of confusion.
Especially since this author seems to be rather heterodox in her view of Dharma.
So that would be one caution.
But at any rate, I hope you enjoyed this review.
Again, I've been discussing Helena Levitskaya and her book, Isis Unveiled.
And I hope you have a good evening.
Thank you for listening.
And hail victory, comrades.
Thank you very much.
Hey, got a question for all you anti-fog dudes listening to us out there.
I thought you guys were supposed to have your revolution on Saturday, November the 4th.
Storm the Winter Palace and all that.
Kind of seems to have fizzled, doesn't it?
Unless, I have to say, this Nimrod who shot up the church on Sunday is one of you guys, like some of them are saying on the internet, but it's too early to tell.
Even so, gunning down 25-30 people in a church isn't exactly a revolutionary act on the level of Lenin's October, now is it?
Anyway, this is for you.
This is for you.
Yeah, the revolution starts now We're all back right in a long, long time What you do to spin in a land Just battle it hard to revolution start now We're
all back in a long, long time I will
the revolution starts now In your own backyard, in your own hometown So what you do in studio, man Just out of your heart The revolution starts now Several
weeks ago, I mentioned that a young man came all the way from the United Kingdom here to the Seattle area just to meet me and to plan his own migration to the Northwest homeland.
Well, that young fellow is now back in England, and he sent us this MP3 file.
He is also a hardcore national socialist, and it seems to me we haven't had anything of that nature on for a while.
So, here he is.
I await impatiently the day when the spring shall return, when day and night shall be of equal length, and when aurora shall be clear and bright.
Martin Luther We are told so often about how it must be done, that this or that fellow shall lead us through the power of his media presence, or his charisma, onwards into the light.
We are told that countless individuals, all spreading different messages, all simultaneously creating an endless network of contradictions, are to see for us victory.
And a victory at that wherein we need do nothing.
These talking heads, as they come, voiced from all quarters the same attitude to the situation.
It is Western identity that is under attack.
It is Judeo-Christian civilization that is under threat.
It is Islam that is the problem, not merely a symptom, and so on.
They list a thousand falsities as if they were speaking gospel truth, and expect their hordes of online followers to gulp down another Twitter statement.
As if God himself has opened up the heavens to bring forth rain after a drought.
Not so an exaggeration.
That these deceiving prophets, or should that be profiteers, go forward together as a unified but completely contradictory front is obvious to even the most childlike observer.
We all know the individuals of whom I speak, the endless swarm of civic nationalists, libertarians.
And even so-called fascists, who pose under the endless tide of the same regurgitated statements, the same lack of genuine belief.
For all their different political opinions, there are two common points which unify them and thus enable them, despite spouting different views of the world, to be unified.
They do not name the Jew, and they are entirely in this for themselves.
On the first point, these deceiving prophets, regardless of what it is they claim to believe, Whether they advocate for the creation of, for example, a new Confederacy, or for a new 1776, this time arranged against the current US government, all refuse to acknowledge the real enemy.
They do not even go so far as to name the origins of the crippling economic situation.
Certainly they will complain that it is difficult for young white people today to form a family unit, that they are discouraged from doing so by various factors, but they do not explain why.
More importantly, They do not name the culprits of this horrific circumstance.
They are much more focused on triggering these so-called social justice warriors than on identifying the individuals responsible for why these social justice warriors exist, or why it is so financially difficult for young white people to form traditional families.
Ultimately, this all feeds into the terrible truth that all of these individuals, regardless of how they identify themselves, are merely in the business of politics to make money.
They are not interested in the survival of the white race.
Many of them actually despise the white race, which is why they use terms such as Western civilization in place of white civilization.
Many of them are sexual perverts or race traitors.
There are even some so-called fascists who turn out to be non-white, Jewish, or sexually perverted.
The problem is not the individuals themselves.
They are horrendous, unaccomplished egotists who deserve not the attention I am giving them now.
But I must, for the reality is much more dangerous.
They preach amongst good young men and women who should be supporting the only correct cause, and they are successful to an unimaginable measure in swaying good white men and women away from the right path, the blessed path, the path of white survival, National Socialism.
That only National Socialism can guarantee the survival of the white race should be self-evident.
But these individuals, these talking heads, these false, deceiving prophets, have been deliberately placed along the path before the dawn.
To discourage those who may waver, who may falter, to have them turned back before that sacred hack and croiss faner can be hoisted once more.
And this is their ultimate purpose.
Whatever they preach, it is never national socialism.
It never names the Jew.
It never names the international high-finance clique, which is so linked Jewry and to such an extent that it is impossible to make any distinction between the two as they are entirely intertwined.
The voracious Jewish spider and the web into which its prey fall.
And that is why they are such poison.
It is why they must be stunted, and if possible, altogether abolished.
That they preach such claptrap without any kind of difficulty beyond the smattering of harassment they receive from the left is evidence twofold.
That they are not really targeted beyond the most basic slander.
This should ring alarm bells, even in the most deluded observer.
And that they are not really challenging the status quo.
Yes, they might complain about the sweeping tide of non-white immigration into Europe and America.
They might complain about low white birth rates, under the guise of words such as native or indigenous, but never the word white.
However, in reality, they are just as much an enemy of the white race as the brown hordes pouring into Europa, and so are those who support them.
You see, an ideology is a comprehensive package.
The Jewish ideal, that of the Kalergi plan, is a goal which unifies the Jewish people.
Their religion, which is as much a political doctrine as it is a religious practice, ensures that they possess an iron will, capable of surmounting individual differences in the name of a common evil.
Some may even dislike the Jewish nation-state, and will publicly say so, but they are united by a loyalty to it, and their plan for the complete subversion of the white race, and thereby the elimination of the European identity, that single identity which blends with careful adjustment the ideas of the collective consciousness and the individual responsibility, and is thereby a threat to the existence of the Jewish race and the Jewish religion as a whole, Ensure that their two-faring a Jewish government and annihilating the white race is possible because they are unified in their intent to achieve this.
If you have not already guessed, the alt-right is nothing.
It does not mean anything.
A collection of various talking heads and prancing loons discuss their various ways of changing the world, all claiming to fight under the same banner, but yet are merely paying lip service to the Jew, who uses them as tools to ensure our destruction by our very inaction.
Some of the leaders of this virtual movement are themselves either of Jewish origin or quite evidently working for Jewish interests, to such an extent that it is incredible that some individuals can support them or follow them, and simultaneously claim to be in support of the 14 words.
These people encourage not laughter nor pity, but anger, because by their stupidity, their inadequacy, and their general idleness, they are more of a threat to the continued existence of the highest culture known to man than any amount of mud-skinned legions ravaging Europe, For ultimately, if every single racially conscious white man woke up and embraced the Northwest Imperative immediately, we would not be in this position.
We would likely already have the state required to ensure the survival of our race, culture, and history.
But this cannot be achieved by a front split into different factions.
Let me explain clearly.
Imagine some twenty people, divided equally into four groups, all of whom are attempting to achieve a goal.
They wish to raise a flag upon a hill.
Each group acknowledges that they all want to raise the flag, and so on.
However, as they go to do this, they all quickly realize that they disagree.
The flag must be raised at such and such an angle, says one group, and then another claims that the flag must be a different size, and then another claims that the flag should be flown first at half-mast because of such and such a reason, and eventually all of these divided groups demonstrate their divisions.
The flag is not raised because they are so busy quarrelling amongst one another that they do not accomplish their goal.
Suffice to say, the situation we are dealing with is much worse.
We are not merely talking about the raising of a piece of cloth, however valuable the sentiment attached to it.
We are talking about the future of history.
If we fail, if we are defeated, everything will be flushed away.
Whatever comes after will be unimaginable torment, for a civilization's existence without identity and culture is merely an ant-heap, waiting to be kicked over by some cosmic force.
As the Fuhrer said, if, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity.
And this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men.
If we are to be victorious, victory shall only be achievable with the strategy of one leader, one ideal, one banner.
Not a fluctuating spectrum of ideological positions, but rather the single bastion of national socialism.
Pure, unchanging, incorruptible, unwavering.
And so through this belief we shall win.
Because that is the key.
Belief first.
And once you believe, you can fight.
And once you can fight, you can win.
But if you do not believe, then in any case, the fight you wage will be a losing one.
And if you cannot fight at your best, you have no hope of winning.
Indeed, these people, these fascists, libertarians, so-called national capitalists, etc., really might believe they're fighting for the 14 words, but they aren't.
They are working for the Jews by paying their lip service to ideologies created by Jewry.
or entirely insufficient for the purpose of providing our race and culture with salvation.
Economics are irrelevant if the race is going to be wiped out.
So why would you be a libertarian?
National capitalism is an oxymoron, and fascism is merely a political and economic system, not a change in fundamental worldview, and is therefore insufficient for the purpose desired.
When we speak of changing the world, we national socialists mean it.
We do not take as examples Mussolini, nor Mosley, nor any of the other so-called fascists who hardly even merit the title, nor do they self-identify as fascists in many cases.
The concept of calling anyone remotely linked to Hitler, or even Mussolini, in theory or practice fascists, is an entirely Judaic concept.
Before the war, and even during it, it was regarded that Mussolini and Hitler were quite different.
Indeed, Churchill even went to some lengths to separate Mussolini and Hitler, who before 1935 had had quite poor relations.
If one is to read Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War, one quickly discovers that Mussolini was quite in fact disgusted with Hitler, and for good reason.
Mussolini did not even come remotely close to resembling the world-changing principle of National Socialism, and thus had reason to fear it.
Fascism is a joke.
It is a political system of power and greed, founded upon statist politics, corporatist economics, and totalitarian thuggery.
National Socialism is power through the will of the people, which finds its expression in the person of the leader.
Where Mussolini called for the state to encompass the entirety of the people, Hitler recognized the truth.
The state is a tool.
Nothing more.
It is the apparatus by which the worker, the farmer, and artisan are protected from the savagery of capitalism and the slavery of Bolshevism.
It is not the end, but merely a means of achieving that end.
And we all know the end, since it is written so clearly in Mein Kampf.
What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction of our race and our people.
The sustenance of our children and the purity of our blood, the freedom and independence of our fatherland, so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted to it by the Creator of the universe.
Every thought and every idea, every doctrine and all knowledge, must serve this purpose, and everything must be examined from this point of view and used or rejected according to its utility.
Any concept which interferes with the fourteen words is by nature an enemy of the survival of the white race.
There must and can be only one salvation.
And to achieve this salvation, we must look to the past and seek a blueprint for our future.
That blueprint has already been provided generously for us by Adolf Hitler.
That this is not embraced with a universal faith amongst our racial brothers and sisters is merely further evidence that these talking heads, these sickening, deceiving prophets, are spouting their delusional bile on behalf of the Jew, and those serving them, or acknowledging them, or supporting them, or apologizing for them, are also enemies of the Fourteen Words.
Until you can clearly say that you take your beliefs exclusively from Adolf Hitler and his associates, that you do not listen to the atrocious nonsense spouted by these fascists, libertarians, capitalists, whatever they may call themselves, you are by default an enemy of the 14 words.
By all good reason, a front line which is divided deserves to collapse in the face of a superior enemy.
If you are sitting here now and are one of those people embracing the harpies that call for systems or philosophies divergent from that provided to us by National Socialism, Then you are doing a disservice not only to yourself, for you are actively embracing blatant idiocy, but also to your race, which will not survive the coming century if this disorganized rabble is permitted to persist in the raging stupidity.
Alfred Rosenberg remarked, National socialism stands or falls by its world view, and ultimately the same applies to the white race.
If we cannot rally around a single banner, and fight for that banner until either our enemies have given up or we are all dead, then we cannot win either way.
And if we cannot even rally around the banner, then I will say this.
The white race will deserve the terrible fate that awaits it, and all those who assisted in this demise, by hook or by crook, will be pulled into the morass with it.
Regardless of the fate of our culture, he who fails to act, or who acts in a fashion which is contrary to common sense, will invariably be punished, perhaps not immediately, but eventually.
Like a deserter who flees the front and leaves the rest of his comrades to die, The preachers of deceit and their callous followers may escape justice for some time, but they will eventually be caught, and the will of the people shall fall upon them as is demanded by history itself.
No quarter for traitors.
No quarter for any other ideology.
No quarter for unsavory individuals.
No quarter for the deceiving prophets.
And above all, no quarter for the Jew.
No matter the severity of the situation.
No matter how bad things may still get.
No quarter ever for the Jews or their servants.
It is as Hitler said and demanded.
The work of the National Socialist Movement is the labor of the coming centuries, and only through your action, your belief, your steadfast determination, can this ever be achieved.
You must assert, I believe, if you are to fight.
And you cannot believe if you simultaneously harbor fundamentally contradictory principles.
So I shall make it abundantly clear for you all.
Fascism and National Socialism are two completely different systems.
Fascism is in fact much closer to Bolshevism than it is in any way to National Socialism.
One must remember that Mussolini was a Socialist after all, and indeed a Socialist in the Marxist sense.
Libertarianism, Anarcho-Capitalism, National Capitalism, whatever you want to call them, are all diseased ideologies founded either by Jews or on the basis of radically ill-minded principles.
Libertarianism is by definition contradictory to the Fourteen Words, Since a state built upon material values is destined to destroy whatever culture it has.
When you can sell everything in the state, do not be surprised when everything is sold off and you have nothing left.
Why would any sane white person desire this?
The conclusion immediately drawn is that no sane white person would ever desire such a state.
We cannot win if we are all imagining a different conclusion to this struggle.
There will be no time for debate, nor any time for tea and cakes to think about how our new state might come about.
If you assert belief in the Northwest Imperative, then you must by definition thereby also assert belief in National Socialism, because no weak state can guarantee the freedom and security of the white race.
It must be that system, that system whereby faith and belief are placed in a single leader, a leader who can guarantee that he will place the burden of waging whatever was necessary upon his own shoulders, that he will be philosopher, statesman, soldier, and the first servant of the people at all times.
As in the spirit of Frederick the Great, passed on to Bismarck and then to Hitler, the leader of the nation is responsible always, as first servant of the people, to guarantee their prosperity, security, and a future for life.
That is the essence of the fourteen words.
Let no persons take that away from you.
Let no one dissuade you from the reality of the situation.
We cannot and we will not achieve victory by half measures.
We cannot achieve anything with a divided front.
Only through a single organization, with one leader, with one plan, with one idea, with one flag and one anthem, can we in any real terms achieve the victory we so desire.
The deceiving prophets will attempt to tell you otherwise, but I advise let them continue to screech like wailing harpies.
They only prove my point, as each one of them is exposed as a pervert, liar, hypocrite, profiteer or Jew.
Meanwhile, those of us true of heart and faithful to the cause maintain a sole belief, more powerful than anything else, belief in Adolf Hitler and his prophecy.
It is necessary that I should die for my people, but my spirit will rise from the grave, and the world will know I was right.
It is necessary that I should die for my people, but my spirit will rise from the grave, and the world will rise from the grave.
It is necessary that I should die for my people, but my spirit will rise from the grave.
It is necessary that I should die for my people, but my spirit will rise from the grave.
It is necessary that I should die for my people, but my spirit will rise from the grave.
What is the Russian people, the Russian people, the Russian people, the Russian people, the Russian people?
Till ich zumCallstieren.
Ist Nun zu versterben.
Untertitelung des ZDF, 2020 I went a bit long with my initial babble and then a bit longer still with some of the other contributions and musical pieces, so I don't have quite as much time here at the end as I had hoped, but maybe that's a good thing.
It will enable me to make this short and sweet and just give you the basics in a nutshell.
What I'm going to do here is to explain to you a couple of new terms that you're going to be hearing a lot of in the future.
I know we've had some of those in the past when I've made these big long speeches on pretentious topics like Ghost Dance and Brandenburg and Settler 17, so here's another one of Harold's hobby horses, only I will probably be riding this one for the rest of my life in one form or another.
This latest hobby horse of mine has two possible names.
Don't know which one will stick best.
It's a strategy, a long-term plan for the 14 words and the establishment of the Northwest American Republic as a homeland for all our people worldwide.
Now, I admit, I have not yet fully thought all this out yet, and I'm going to need your help with that.
You can call it one of two things.
The Back to the Future plan, or more simply, you can call it Party Professionalization.
The idea that in order to secure the existence of our people and the future for white children, we must alter the entire way that the white nationalist movement operates and does business.
We must abandon what has been known for the past 30 years or so, incorrectly I might add, as leaderless resistance, or what I call the loosey-goosey business plan.
We must return to certain techniques and modus operandi of our movements past which sorta, kinda worked in a very half-assed way for a time, because those practices at least attempted to impose some kind of organization, direction, hierarchy, and discipline on the kind of weak, cowardly, immature, and ineffectual white boys that we get in our wee little movement.
We can no longer continue to try and move this mountain with a small group of adolescents of all ages playing with electronic devices.
We have to start either attracting serious committed adults or if we can't attract them then we must grow them from the people we have.
This will involve persuading the white boys we have to undergo a spiritual metamorphosis and change their very nature.
To be someone other than who and what they are, and that is a mammoth undertaking with any group of human beings.
I believe we have to go back to the future because, at long last, if there is to be any hope for our survival as a species, we must right now confront and deal with the issue of our own character.
Our own largely bad character.
We need to understand that the reason we dropped formal organization and adopted loosey-goosey back in the 1990s was not due to the admitted dangers of enemy infiltration and party bureaucratization, which, by the by, are indeed serious and pressing dangers in the formal organization model, and we're going to have to deal with them in whatever we come up with.
We adopted leaderless resistance in the 1990s because our leaders were dog-do.
Sexual perverts, Jews posing as white, embezzlers, egotists, mentally and emotionally unbalanced people, or even more often, truly sincere men from the working class who tried but were simply way, way out of their depth.
The old movement produced some leaders who in other circumstances would have made good sergeant majors, but never any generals.
Not since Commander Rockwell died.
We dropped formal organization because the character of the majority of white males born after about 1970 is so lazy, so weak, so narcissistic, their socially engineered attention span is so short, their historical knowledge non-existent, and their level of practical political knowledge and by now basic literacy is so low that white boys are simply incapable of it.
To use a popular British expression, Generation Xers and Millennials as a whole couldn't organize a piss-up in a brewery.
Any of this starting to sound familiar?
We've spent the past 50 years trying to drive a nail with a marshmallow, and we need to go back to the kind of attempted party-building of the old days which at least tried to impose some kind of structure and discipline on these pale marshmallows.
Now, what's it all innate of?
Well, guys, let me give you my own purely personal, selfish, and narcissistic answer.
I'm 64 years old now, and when I die, I want one of my last sights on Earth to be looking out of a window in my bedroom and seeing the blue, white, and green tricolor flag flying in the sky on a flagpole.
No more hiding.
No more having to lie to people about who we are or what we want.
That's a simple desire.
And, in its own way, probably one of the most difficult ever attempted.
We'll be talking about that.
A lot.
But our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, WA 98310.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then...
Sarsha Underbond.
▲
Export Selection