All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 19, 2017 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:03:31
20170119_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush your vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be.
In the old spot, by the river, rifle, known to you and me.
One for four, for signal, token, whistle, up the marching tune.
Like upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon By the rising of the moon Switch your eyes upon your shoulder Like the rising of the moon Out from many a mud-walled cabin eyes Were watching through the night Many a man's chest was throbbing For the blessed warming night Please.
Outro Music.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's January the 19th, 2017.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, tomorrow is Inauguration Day, and the wild and crazy ride begins.
I'm looking forward to it.
Looks like 2016 is going to be a long, long year, lasting until 2020, at least.
But more on that later.
Now, there's a couple of movement-related events that I'd like to talk about which have a kind of tangential bearing on the NF.
First off, remember last week when I was laying it on you guys about how a little bit of interracial sex and a little dab of Jewish ancestry and a wee spot of buggery and even small doses...
Is not okay for so-called white nationalists on any level, but most certainly not okay for people who are in leadership, or at least what you might call management positions?
Well, we've had a bit of that come to light since then.
To many of you, I know this is going to sound like just internet bullshit, which it is, of course, but since we exist 90% on the internet, these things are important.
I've been on Twitter for a year now, and I still have less than a thousand followers, but I've been able to get a certain scope on the alt-right scene.
In addition to Twitter itself, there are certain websites and forums and podcasts which are, or were, really big time by our standards.
Big fish in a small pond, so to speak.
Now, I just don't have the time to follow all this stuff myself, personally.
God knows I spend entirely too much time glued to this screen as it is, but essentially, the big three as I see it are, or were up until this week, Richard Spencer's National Policy Institute, Andrew Anglin's Daily Stormer, and a site called The Right Stuff by a man using the name Mike Enoch.
Now, I'm aware that there have been alleged, rumored problems with all three of these individuals and sites as far as their bona fides, their past, their lifestyles, and their true agendas.
I won't go into details on Spencer and Anglin, because contrary to what you may have heard, I don't spread smears and rumors off the internet with no proof or evidence of any kind.
I'm not the director of the CIA, nor am I the New York Times.
I honestly am not in a position to tell just how much of this cack is true.
However, in the case of Mike Enoch and the Right Stuff Forum and YouTube brand, that has now been provided to my satisfaction.
I'm going to take a brief digression here.
Bear with me.
This is relevant to the main point that I'm trying to make.
Now, some of you are aware of what doxing is.
D-O-X-I-N-G.
Or sometimes D-O-X-X-I-N-G.
Anyway, it means exposing someone's personal information on the internet, including home address, photo, photo of someone's house, place of employment, car and license plate, names of relatives, the schools you let your kids go to, if any, publishing your social security number so that your identity can be stolen, that kind of thing.
The idea is that since America is full of crazy lunatics who do crazy-ass shit and who don't have sense enough to be afraid of the police and prisons, you harm someone you hate by telling all the lunatics where to find them and give directions on how to come to their doorstep at 11 o 'clock at night and that kind of thing.
The idea is to get you fired from your job.
Isolate you from your friends and your neighbors by revealing that you are the other, the heretic, the witch who must be burned to appease the angry gods.
Now, this, of course, is why so many white people are terrified to support the party or any other white nationalist group, why they're so terrified to have anything to do with us, why they're so petrified with fear even to give me a mailing address, that sort of stuff.
And if you have something to lose, yeah, this can be pretty unpleasant.
The ultimate goal, of course, is to get left-loon space cadets or just plain crazy people who are too mentally disturbed for the law and the courts and the prisons to have any deterrent effect to come to someone's home and commit assault and vandalism, to terrorize your children, so forth and so on, while the people responsible for the doxing hide nice and safe and snug behind their computers and disclaim any responsibility.
I think there may by now be a few feeble state laws against doxing, having to do with revenge porn and whatnot, but since it's mostly used by the loony left against so-called Nazis and racists and Trump supporters and so on, in other words, against us, the police and the courts are even more useless than usual in dealing with it.
In most cases, when white nationalists are doxed, the police don't even pretend to offer any protection.
If you try to report it, they just tell you to piss off.
You brought it on yourself by being different.
The media does this a lot to our kind of people.
For example, they recently exposed the home addresses of the mothers of Andrew Anglin and Richard Spencer, including some pretty direct incitement to acts of violence and vandalism, etc.
There is even a quasi-legal term for this, stochastic terrorism, which the loony left keeps trying to get court precedents on so they can use it against Sean Hannity and Bill O 'Reilly, i.e.
they want to silence their conservative opposition by holding them responsible for the acts of individuals unknown to them.
They tried to get one of those right-wing media personalities.
I think it might have been Hannity when that guy in Colorado shot at the planned parenthood clinic in an attempt to shut down a baby parts mill.
Now, for the record, I myself have been doxed on a number of occasions, more often than not by our own people, of course.
Starting with the early 1990s, when Tom Metzger used to shout out my home address on his recorded message and incite his skinhead children of the night to assault me, so forth and so on.
The last time it happened was about two years ago, I think.
What people don't realize is that doxing is not necessarily that dangerous.
It depends on a variety of factors, and above all, how vulnerable you are, how much you have to lose.
Someone like me, with no family, no young children in the house, I've got no regular job whose employer can be pressured, I'm someone who has lived and traveled all his life.
I'm a guy with what the FBI refers to as a short tail.
It's hard to get a hold of me through my loved ones and so forth.
There is a saying that he who has a wife and children and loved ones has given hostages to fortune.
Well, I don't have any hostages to fortune, so in my case it's not anywhere near as effective.
The only problems I have ever had caused by doxing, other than email threats and more internet harassment, were a bunch of silly crank phone calls in Seattle for a while, and one guy many years ago who drove down from Dallas to San Antonio with the stated intention of trying to film me naked through the blinds of my apartment, which he failed to do.
Okay.
Now, by way of full disclosure, there was one other incident, although you need to bear in mind that this had to do with a specific situation, which I won't get into, but which was much more complex and involved than just some turkey posting photos of me on the internet.
This was something which really would not apply to your average individual who just gets duxed by some little creep on 4chan or whatever.
In the summer of 1998 in San Antonio, three men came to my door one afternoon, claiming to be local white nationalists of some kind, Klansman, I think, and supposedly wanting to take me out to dinner, since I was such a fine fellow, which would, of course, have involved my getting into their van with them.
Now, I'd never heard of these guys before.
I didn't like their looks, and I was pretty sure I knew why they were there and who had sent them.
I spoke to them from the door.
It was all very civil and polite, while I was wearing a gun on my belt, which they saw.
And they decided that discretion was a better part of valor.
I later got a squeal from someone within the movement that I had been correct in my assessment of the situation and these men had intended to do me harm, but I have no way of knowing that for sure and I don't insist on it.
For all I know, I might have blown off three perfectly friendly individuals who honestly did just want to take me out for some brisket.
Now, what I'm getting at here...
Is that doxing is something that was going on even before the internet, and it's usually a bad thing done by weak and cowardly people who are trying to lash out and hurt others without being held accountable, which is a very American phenomenon.
But there are times when doxing can be a useful thing, and it can perform a valuable service.
By tearing the mask away from someone within our ranks who is wearing one, especially someone who is hiding on the internet wearing a mask, and we get a lot of that today.
I still don't know all the ins and outs, but apparently this Mike Enoch character of the Right Stuff and Daily Show website, all the forums and podcasts and YouTube brands, There were big Trump backers all during the campaign and were cited as being a large part of Trump's apparatus on the alt-right.
Anyway, this guy was correctly outed as being a New York Jew named Mike Pinovich operating out of the Upper East Side apartment who is also married to a Jewish woman who has appeared at least in voice on some of his YouTubes.
The outing took place on 8chan, which I'm not certain just what all these assorted chans are.
Your average 14-year-old probably knows more about all this stuff than I do.
I'm way behind.
I understand that most of Pinovich's stuff, like Daily Shoa, is shut down now, and that he has admitted that he got caught fair and square.
Not sure how it's proceeding since this only started a couple of days ago, but do you see why we have to try, try, try?
To maintain some kind of quality control and standards as to who acts as our public spokesman.
I long ago gave up on forming any kind of actual organized party like Adolf Hitler or Lenin had.
Americans simply don't have that much strength of character.
We had that gene kind of bred out of us.
But do you see why we cannot allow people to just dabble and let slide because they quote-unquote do so much good for the movement, so who cares if they're married to a Mexican or they're sticking their penis into another man's rectum or blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Do you see why there really needs to be some kind of reliable agency or trusted vetting procedure to try and make sure that the white resistance movement is in fact white?
Because you see, Salon Magazine was one of the outfits that got hold of this.
It is embarrassing.
Excruciatingly embarrassing when this kind of horse dung happens.
And I think by now, after 50 years of this nonsense, we'd be used to excruciating embarrassment.
But we don't even try anymore.
It makes us look like fools.
It's made us look like fools all the way back to the Dan Burroughs episode in the 1960s.
One of the cardinal rules that we need to insist on as a community, if we're going to be all loosey-goosey like this, is that at least you don't make us look like fools.
This is one of the reasons that I tried all those years when I was getting my so-called bad reputation to try and get our people to pay attention to this kind of stuff, and I never got any traction on it.
Now, when we're finally...
Dipping at least a little bit into the mainstream, we still have all these sloppy, incompetent habits and all the baggage that we had on the character issue back in the days when we were just mailing each other newspaper clippings and mimeographed newsletters from our garages.
Well, at least in those days most of us lived in houses and had garages.
Greetings from Seattle.
This is Andy Donner.
At this point, I should have delivered a really important shortcast to you all, and that's still going to happen in the immediate future.
But I've noticed a disturbing trend on which I couldn't help but comment.
And thankfully enough, this other issue is actually a great precursor to my shortcast.
I hope you've all shaken off the new year and are paying close attention.
I do realize we're staring down Trump's inauguration, and that's going to preoccupy us all a bit longer.
So perhaps it's good that I haven't put out that shortcast just yet.
I need you all in a state of maximum receptivity, because every single one of us needs to start taking this white nationalism thing seriously as soon as the Trumpalupagus is yesterday's news item, and I don't want to compete with major news events taking attention away from what I have to say.
For the time being, I'm going to content myself with talking about that deliberate and willful refusal to understand which seems to be the hallmark of the white nationalist movement for as long as any of us can remember, and certainly the last two or so decades in particular.
Since the beginning of the year, I've noticed a much-despised trend cycling yet again, and it's driving me nuts.
All over the NF's web presence, and the white nationalist internet scene to a lesser extent, has been the suggestion that the NF just needs to be a new one.
Okay, look.
I know the people saying this probably mean it as encouragement, but it doesn't come across that way.
In fact, it seems like more of the same willful refusal to understand you've heard about on RFN for the program's entire history.
And this latest round has the additional influence of the refusal to even interact with the material we present.
And for the record, I know for a fact one of the people I'm referring to actually lives in the homeland and seems to have done so for quite some time.
So this isn't just a matter of me whinging at you all to come home.
But just what's wrong with the thought that the NF will take off when it is somehow exposed to a large audience?
This sentiment can be interpreted a few ways and none of them are flattering to us or the person making the remark, with perhaps the exception of those resident in the homeland for reasons I'll address after making my point.
The first and most obvious treatment of such a remark is that of a casual sort of mention intended to pass as moral support.
It should go without saying, even though it clearly doesn't, that this is the sort of support and encouragement we don't care about.
Sure, that sounds callous and it probably is, but there's a very good reason, which you'll all understand better after I deliver my shortcast on TheoryCraft.
I don't want to focus on this sort of thing today, since I'll end up rehashing half of my material from said shortcast.
For now, I'll just say that assuming you're in a position to encourage or coach us is outright insulting, when quite a few of us turned our lives around.
Again, yes, I know this is incredibly off-putting, and I'm sorry for not explaining better right now.
Just know I promised to remedy this lack of explanation in short order.
Assuming someone's meaning isn't that of a casual off-hand attempt at seeming friendly, no matter how out of turn it is.
Things only get worse, and this goes in a couple different directions, too.
To begin with, the more positive interpretation.
The many of you who communicated this to the party and I in the last couple of weeks could mean that our material is fine.
More precisely, you think you're communicating that the party is doing a good job and that we're not our own limiting factor.
But if that's the case, then the audience is the limiting factor.
That's you, in case you hadn't noticed.
Surely you understand that if our message and presentation is fit for a massive audience and we're not getting the sort of responses we need, then that places the blame in one very specific place.
Serious question, guys.
Do you think about things before you say them?
Again, this doesn't apply to the one person I know for a fact lives in the homeland, since statements can mean slightly different things depending on the person making them.
But for the rest of you, yeah, I don't quite know what to say this time.
In trying to be nice to the party for the purpose of experiencing the camaraderie you imagine we share with you, you've accidentally insulted yourselves here, or perhaps insulted the rest of the audience.
And of course, having insulted yourselves and or everyone else listening, you unintentionally deprecate your own opinion which actually counteracts your intended effect in giving us positive feedback.
As I've said already, I'm left almost speechless every time this happens.
Having addressed the rosy side of this possibility, I'll need to deal with the darker and more upsetting mode of interpretation.
That being the case, let's assume for the sake of discussion that those making this remark didn't mean to insult the audience and wouldn't have done so had they made time to consider their feedback before providing it.
Well, that means the problem really is the party, and I'm not above considering that for this submission today, but as you'll see, this quickly bumps into the character issue again, regardless of whatever the party may or may not do wrong at the moment.
Our current situation is this.
The party isn't getting the reaction we need or want from our audience, but the size of the audience expanding will change this.
Supposedly.
There's actually a certain amount of reason there.
An infinitesimally small segment of the listener base of RFN will actually complete their Northwest migration as is required of them.
If the audience were to expand by multiple orders of magnitude, we might get the sort of reaction we want based purely on statistics.
But that's might.
The commentary we're given suggests this as a sure-fire thing.
But why?
A mass audience would need to be brought up to speed on all sorts of history and racial demographics concepts before they would be able to receive the Northwest Imperative as a concept, let alone something they, personally, must do.
And all that being the case, it should be much easier to cause our current audience to act as we need than it would be to convert a muggle and bring them up to speed to the point where our supposedly excellent material convinces them to do things all of you can't organize.
...somehow.
See the problem here?
Any rational handling of what is said to us can't help but trip over the issue of the character problem and how it inhibits the behaviors the party needs all of you to exhibit, so we know we can start setting up actual infrastructure in earnest.
Those already in the homeland could reasonably comment in the way I've talked about today because they personally feel ready for the party's next step, and I get that, but it's entirely beside the core issue of character.
Last RFN Harold made the observation that most people just aren't capable of the sort of change the party needs, but that he would spend as much time as is needed with anyone willing to try.
I'm more or less in the same boat because, even if I do nothing else, I need to help the party understand what it takes to more or less package and recreate whatever it is that enables someone to act as we need.
I've made a few attempts at this on RFN, and I even spent a large portion of 2016 trying to point out ways in which lingering cultural Marxism affects many white nationalists.
But that didn't really go anywhere because, once again, no one could participate due to their refusal to understand.
Over the years, the party really has bent over backwards to make sure we're providing you all the best tools we can, but you actually have to make use of them yourselves since that's not something we can do for you.
I know I personally have made a couple of serious attempts at helping each and every one of you stare down the white character problem and deal with it.
At this point in time, I have to admit to a certain amount of personal frustration because no matter what the party does, there's essentially no follow-through, and that's got to change.
This is Pale White Skin.
Hey there, Obo.
What's it like living in cities filled with Muslims and non-whites and other apes who make life shitty?
How is that?
Is it worth acting like a doormat?
Aristocrat.
Hey there, Europa, you should worry about the migrants.
From now on, it's up to you.
You must make it through this crisis.
Yes, it's you.
You're the ones who must defend the land of your own clan.
Oh, you're up for Europeans.
Oh, you're up is all we have.
Oh, you're up for Europeans.
Europe is all we have Europe is all we have Hey there Europa I know times are getting hard But if you get your shit together One day you and I could be among the stars We'll have the life we knew we could It's understood We'll
erupt in chaos and start anew.
I know it's true Oh, you're up for Europeans Oh, Europe is all we have Oh, Europe is all we have
Oh, Europe is all we have We've all forgotten who we are We're conquerors with many scars It's in our blood to battle for our kind The populace is waking up At night before they've been blown up It's hard for me to understand your mind
Europe, I can promise you That by the time that this is through That you will never ever be the same Guess who's to blame?
Hey there, Europe, please hold on Just a bit longer Every day I learn so much About your past and I grow fonder Yes, I do We'll soon make history for you.
You'll know it's all because of you Hey there Europa, here's to you This one's for you Oh, you're up for Europeans Oh, Europe is all we have
Oh, Europe for Europeans Oh, Europe is all we have Oh, Europe for Europeans
Oh, Europe is all we have Oh, Europe for Europeans Oh, Europe is all we have Europe is all we have
Thank you.
Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing Alan de Benoit's The Indo-Europeans in Search of the Homeland.
This is a key intellectual pastime which has gone on since the mid-19th century.
The discipline of Indo-European studies produces great controversy, but few solid results.
Part of this is due to its interdisciplinary nature.
A scholar may focus on religion, linguistics, archaeology, or these days also genetics.
However, this book was originally written in 1997, and so it confines itself to cultural and linguistic artifacts.
Another hindrance to this study, traditionally, has been an overly short timeline.
This discipline evolved when even serious scholars tended to regard the Bible as a historic document, and they would often try to cram all of history into its small timeline.
In the early days Fury ran the gamut from the Valley of Pamir, the Hindu Kush, to South Russia, or even Central Europe, which was naturally the favorite of the Pan-Germans, or I would also suppose potentially the Pan-Slavics, who might favor Poland, or the Bolts, who favored Latvia or Lithuania.
And indeed Latvia and Lithuania do have very ancient languages which are very much and very obviously akin to Sanskrit.
In some cases, political affiliation didn't necessarily always dictate your belief in whether the homeland was initially in Asia or Europe.
There were some exceptions to that, and this book does mention those.
Personally, I have sometimes wondered whether the forests of northern India might be a possibility, because indeed those forests are temperate.
And they do have bears in those forests.
That is a key feature to the Proto-Indo-European homeland because those are all vocabulary terms.
Now, in modern times, one of the more unusual suggestions is the Anatolian Hypothesis.
This is a theory that is severely questioned by Benoit.
This is especially because the reconstructed terms seem to reflect a temperate climate.
The Mideast is often presumed to be very warm and very arid.
However, if the homeland was located in a mountainous region, or if the climate of certain parts of the Mideast differ from the way they are today, this seemingly important objection may be rendered moot.
However, one would still have to account for the mobile and semi-nomadic aspect of Proto-Indo-European culture because we know that the Indo-Europeans had the chariot and the horse,
but the Anatolian hypothesis seems to posit that the Proto-Indo-Europeans, and indeed a bit later than that, the Indo-Europeans, really had a However,
even though certain aspects of this theory may seem far-fetched, it is interesting to note...
That when we read Nordic mythology, we read of the Aesir, we read of Odin's family coming to Northern Europe directly from Anatolia.
So that makes that theory more interesting and more credible as far as I'm concerned.
Now, of course, we could hardly speak of Proto-Indo-European without at least discussing the Kurgan culture to some extent.
And we're often led to believe that the Kurgan culture is something of an end-all and be-all, something of a final answer.
However, Benoit points out that the Kurgan culture is actually a series of various cultures in different time frames.
And there are some scholars who question the continuity of that culture.
In any case, we know that the Kirgin culture did lead us to the Scythians.
Really developed the eastern branch of Indo-European.
Now these days scholars are really pushing the envelope as far as how early the distribution of Proto-Indo-European occurred.
And there are even some who suggest a Paleolithic continuity theory.
Now this theory is famously hinted at if you would read the popular series, what I'm going to call the Clan of the Cave Bear series, or the Valley of Horses series.
One of the problems with this theory, as interesting as it seems, is that we know the Proto-Indo-Europeans were already working with metal, and they also understood the breeding of livestock.
And if indeed Proto-Indo-European goes all the way back to Magdalene culture, indeed how would we explain that?
We would be indeed quite stumped.
So Benoit points out that at the end of the day, we have really two competing theories, at least as far as location is concerned, if not necessarily a mutually agreed-upon timeline.
And that is, we have one theory dealing with the Black and Caspian Sea.
And these theories work out linguistically, but archaeologically they're rather weak.
Or we can place the original homeland around the Rhine and the Volga, in which case we have a lot of archaeological evidence, but our linguistic evidence is evidently rather weak.
So now that we're frustrated with so many various theories, now Benoit takes us into the Arctic theory.
And this comes from the fact that Gene Sullivan Bailey was reviewing various Vedic texts.
And found that there were certain astrological configurations that did not make sense in terms of India, but would have made sense 49 degrees north of India.
So this encouraged the Arctic theory.
And this was an idea embraced by Bell Tullock.
And this theory argues that after leaving the Arctic because of Very severe climate change after a severe winter came to the Arctic.
And this severe winter is recorded in a great majority or possibly even all Indo-European mythologies.
And the most famous example of this being Ragnarok.
So the Proto-Indo-Europeans left the Arctic and temporarily went to live in western Siberia, according to this theory, before dispersing.
One interesting possible piece of evidence for this theory occurs within the genome of really all Poles because it is interesting to note that it seems that every Polish person has within their genome 0.1% Yakut.
And the Yakuts are an ethnicity.
They are racially Asiatic, but they speak a Ural-Altic language.
And they seem to be a group of people that really does keep to themselves.
It's really odd as to why this would be found in the...
Polish genome.
It perhaps could be chalked up to the Mongol invasions, but it's really still quite odd.
So that's an interesting point to note there.
Now one possible semi-solution to this puzzlement is this notion that somehow or other there was a primary homeland and then there was some sort of a secondary homeland.
Another thing that Benoit points out is that the tree of Indo-European languages might not be entirely complete, because he notes certain languages like Estonian and Etruscan that are now considered to be Old European, but that could be someday reclassified as Proto-Indo-European.
Benoit laments the lack of research into the solar cult and the various stages of the sky, the daytime sky, the nighttime sky, and the twilight sky, and also states that there should be more research into the tripartite social functions.
However, Benoit cautions against assuming some sort of a caste system.
Indeed, the severity of a caste system seems to exist primarily in outliers and most famously in India, whereas the Germanic and the Balto-Slavic cultures seem relatively egalitarian.
Benoit notes that a deity such as Tor or Mars also will have a warlike aspect, but they'll also have an agricultural aspect.
So it's probable that originally there was simply two classes, the warrior farmer or the priest king, and then the third class was actually individuals who became assimilated into Indo-European culture but were not Indo-European themselves.
Now, this book is a very interesting clearinghouse for all of these theories, and just as when we come to entire frustration about finding ever a final answer, Benoit notes that even though we don't have an exact homeland for Proto-Indo-European,
We do have a more exact homeland for the Ural Altix speakers, and that is typified in, for example, The Hungarian language is an example of this.
Also, the Semi language is an example of this Ural-Altic.
They have a much more confined, original linguistic area.
It is believed that Indo-European developed bordering on them.
So if you find their homeland, you can, by inference, understand something about the original Indo-European homeland.
So that gives us more of a solid foundation to kind of latch onto as we struggle to sort through all of this information.
It's very difficult when you're dealing with prehistory, and that is the mystery of prehistoric, and by prehistoric I mean simply before there were written records, or at least written records that were easily preserved or consistent.
So I thank you for listening and have a good evening and hail victory, comrades.
Thank you.
This is Bobby Horton.
Rally round our country's flag, Rally boys nor do not lag.
Come from every vale and crag, Sons of Liberty.
Northern band who tread our soil, Forth they come.
For blood and spoil, to the homes we've gained with toil, Shouting slavery.
Traitorous Lincoln's bloody band, now invades the free man's land, Armed with sword and firebrand, against the brave and free.
Armed with sword and firebrand, march ye forth for day and night, stop not till the foe.
Sons of Chivalry We're good
fight, strike for God, for truth, for right, strike for liberty.
For truth, for right, strike for liberty.
All right, folks, welcome back to the second half of the Condition Critical Show.
I'm your host, Jay Shanahan.
You're listening right here on the American Voice Radio Network, and it is my live show for the 16th day of February 2016, 41 minutes past the hour.
All right, let's continue on with this conversation about race because it has to be done.
Here's another headline, and this is an opinion piece out of the USA Today from Jim Wallace.
Headline, let's get personal about racism.
It starts off, some white Americans would like to try and fix the systemic racism that exists in our criminal justice, educational, economic, and even our religious institutions.
But in order for real change to occur, our understanding of realities like white privilege must also move beyond the institutional and into the very personal.
See, this is really, guys, this whole white privilege thing, it's something you really have to put, your antenna has to go up, and you have to really understand what it is that they're trying to do.
They've pulled out all the other stuff, and so now the new kind of mantra for their side is they're pushing this white privilege.
That's how they're trying to push this on us.
It goes on.
When 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was killed in Sanford, Florida in 2012, I remember looking at my own son, Luke.
Trayvon and Luke were similar in age, but the more we learned about how Trayvon died, the more painfully obvious the differences became.
Luke is now a six-foot-tall baseball player and going off to college next year, while Trayvon's family continues to grieve his death.
Whatever.
Even President Obama, one of the most powerful people in the world, noted that, quote, Well, he's kind of right and he's kind of wrong because that's not what white people do generally.
That's what black people do, mostly.
It goes on.
Are white Americans willing and able to confront the underlying white privilege at the heart of two boys' vastly different futures?
What does it mean for white parents to truly lament the painful racial truth in our country?
What the hell does that mean?
What does that mean?
And it's a nice try.
I mean, the writers, the people, I'm guessing these are filthy Jews that put this kind of tripe together.
Because blacks ain't smart enough.
It goes on.
Last month, our family was in England celebrating Christmas.
While we were there, we saw the headlines from America that a white police officer in Cleveland, Ohio, who shot and killed 12-year-old Tamir Rice in 2014, would not face trial.
Tamir, not yet even a teenager, was shot and killed just two seconds after a police car pulled up to the boy in a park.
The prosecutor, blah, blah, blah, and it goes on, blah, blah, blah, we all know, whatever.
And it goes on, it says now they're trying to justify it, and it's just one more article.
I just want to get to maybe some different context in here instead of...
Let's see here.
For the past decade, I've coached my sons in Little League Baseball.
All the dads and moms of our black players have had the talk with their sons about how to act and how not to in the presence of a police officer or any white man with a gun.
Jeez, whatever.
But the parents of the white players have not had such a talk with their sons, and most don't even know how this talk is going on.
Should it be acceptable to white parents that their kids' black teammates' parents...
Many of whom they would consider their friends have to tell their children that those responsible for law enforcement in their communities are not to be trusted.
What should the lament of white parents be alongside the fears of black parents?
In the midst of our racial divides, perhaps one way to come together is to realize that all parents want the same thing for our children, an education, a job, a family, a safe and healthy life, and that our love for those children is universal.
Well, let's see here.
We want the same thing for all of our children and education.
Okay, well, why don't black females stop having 18 kids?
And where are the black dads?
Where are they?
The ones that aren't in prison, where are they?
Let's see, how about a job?
They want a job.
Well, why don't you get off a welfare, a Jamiroquai in Shaniqua?
Why don't you try getting off a welfare, okay, and going and getting a job?
You know why you don't?
Well, because it's hard and it takes hard work.
A family.
Well, you don't know what a family is.
Blacks don't know what a family is.
A safe and healthy life?
What's that?
I guess that's like doing crack in the hood, right?
And robbing convenience stores and brutalizing white people.
So, yes, we are vastly different there, black people.
We are vastly different.
And that's your fault.
That's not mine.
That's not white privilege.
That's being smart.
That's taking responsibility for yourself.
And I'm not going to be accused of white privilege.
I'm not going to be accused of my good fortune because of this color of my skin.
Debt!
Be racist.
Just because you want to have 18 kids and be on welfare and wear your hat sideways and your pants down around below your ass and act like a moron and listen to gangster rap.
Just because you want to do that, and you think, you know, that when you go for, and I don't know that it happens that much, but say you go to apply for a job, and you can't talk, because you talk like, well, just watch any of these TV shows.
Well, you talk like a boy from the hood.
You don't speak English.
This is the Ebonics, and it's some kind of hybrid English.
Who would hire you?
Even at 7-Eleven, who would hire you?
Let's see, is Universal.
Could that bring us together to challenge and change the very different perspective that still values white lives and white children more than black ones?
Well, that's nonsense.
You don't value your own lives.
And just because white people, you know, you take Detroit and you take a lot of these inner cities that used to be vibrant neighborhoods back in the 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, probably up into the early 60s until diversity happened, right?
And then they saw what was happening.
The whites didn't.
So that's what you had this white flight out to the suburbs, right?
And it's like, hey, man, I don't want to be around these savages and these animals.
Some of the blacks went and there were blacks out in the suburbs.
They weren't savages and everything was good.
Hey, man, barbecue and whatever, right?
Well, got to have diversity.
The Jews found out, well, there's too much.
There's not enough diversity out there in them suburbs.
We got to change this.
We got to have chaos.
We've got to bust the blacks.
We've got to bust the animals and the savages out to the suburbs now.
So then where do the white people go?
Well, there's very little places for the white people to go.
But you know what?
When white people go there, there's no chaos.
They're not burning down their towns.
They're not robbing convenience stores and doing drugs.
Okay?
It's only when you diversify the neighborhood.
And that's on the black community.
That's on the black community.
That's not on the white community.
So wake the hell up as a Christian and this guy.
This reporter, what was his name, whatever, he's saying as a Christian, and so he's not a very good Christian as far as I'm concerned, which means I have been giving the blessing of hope.
But hope must be accomplished by action, by change, by the hard work of creating God's kingdom here on earth.
Repentance of our nation's racial sins means more than simply saying I'm sorry.
It means turning around and forging a new path.
White parents must start to truly listen to and believe the experiences and perspectives of black parents.
When genuine listening and honest dialogue occurs, we have a much better chance of changing hearts and minds, which is the best way to change and eventually end the horrible and unacceptable violence that is battering communities across America.
In other words, if white Christians acted more Christian than white, black parents could feel less fear for their children.
This is the Reverend Jim Wallace.
He's the president and founder of Sojourners and author of the new book America's Original Sin, Racism, White Privilege.
And the bridge to a new America.
Well, this guy's an idiot.
He's an idiot, and he's a moron, and he's a piece of garbage.
Let me just go back here and see what he said that I can...
Maybe if he's listening, Jim, maybe I'll write you a letter.
What is it?
If white Christians acted more Christian, then black parents could feel less fear for their children.
I told the story of riding my mountain bike up in the black neighborhood in Seattle when I first moved out here, and little kids, little black savages came out throwing rocks at me.
That's right, and I was a white guy.
That happens to white people.
If the same thing were to happen right here on my street today, it would be chaos.
CNN would be here, and all the talking heads would be here.
They'd have their, like, news trucks out front.
That's how things really are.
So where does the privilege truly lie?
And you know what?
Here's the thing.
It's not privilege, really, if you want to reverse it, because the whole white privilege thing, it's not even worth mentioning because it's tripe.
OK, I turn the tables and it's black privilege.
But as I was going to say, what kind of privilege is that?
What kind of privilege is it having the kind of lives that they do, that they choose to live?
Really?
That's privilege?
I would have to look at myself in the mirror and say, what are we doing to ourselves, black community, when we mob up and all we want to do is blame white people every day, day in and day out?
And now there's the new buzzword, the new buzzphrase, which is white privilege, that again, they didn't conjure up because they're not smart enough to do so.
If they just looked at themselves and said, if they just walked out their front door and got off their fat asses from watching Oprah and eating their Cheetos and Skittles and drinking their iced tea and shooting up crack and smoking marijuana, and I'm maybe being a bit flippant, but I have to prove the point, right?
If they just...
Got up and walked outside and looked at their neighborhoods and said, you know what?
I don't see any white people here.
I see black people here.
And this neighborhood is a disaster area.
It's crime-ridden.
There's garbage everywhere.
There's needles everywhere.
I don't see any white people here.
Don't you think that would ring a bell?
Then if they got in their car, if they had one, but they can get on the bus and they don't even have to pay for it because they get free bus passes.
And they don't even need a free bus pass.
They just have to get on the bus and threaten the white bus driver.
Threaten to kill him.
Or beat him over the head with a stick or something.
And he's going to give him a ride to the next neighborhood.
Let's just say they did one of those things and said, hey, honky, take me to the white neighborhood.
And then, because they would be unmolested in that white neighborhood, they would be more safe in that white neighborhood.
And they could walk around and they would see the neatly cut lawns.
They would see the freshly painted houses.
They would see garbage in garbage cans.
They would see cars that weren't lowered to the ground and with spray-painted and what have you, right?
They would see husband and wives walking with their children and Fluffy, the dog, right?
And the baby in the stroller and, hi, dear, and what the, oh, yes, honey, and work was very well today and blah, blah, blah.
And they could walk around and maybe experience that stuff and take it all in.
Then they could maybe, not maybe, because they could do all this unmolested, and then they could go, like, to the local convenience store, you know, the little Jiffy Mart.
Right?
To maybe buy some Skittles, because that's what they do, and they go in, and the white clerk would, oh, how you doing there, sir?
What can I do you for?
And he'd kind of cock his head like a dog.
Wow, man, this is what's going on here.
This is kind of nice.
Maybe.
Then he could go to the school, the white school, and see the kids not running around like a bunch of freaking animals with their pants down below their ass, hat on sideways.
Brutalizing one another, teachers screaming and yelling, SWAT teams stationed under roofs, snipers and fire trucks and critical response teams just waiting for the next thing to happen at the Black, at their school, right?
They can walk around, wow, the kids are, they're well-behaved and teacher, they're just coming, oh, hi, Susie, and that was a very good job on your test.
Oh, thank you, Mrs. Dwight, thank you.
And then little Johnny comes walking up and, oh, Johnny, that was very good this afternoon, what you did for him, blah, blah, blah.
Oh, well, thank you, Mr. Whatever.
And they could see all that experience and they could walk out of the school and they could, like, walk down the street and see that there's not cop cars going back and forth.
There's not critical response teams at each and every house and fire trucks rushing by.
And they could think, wow, am I in paradise?
Did I die and did I go to heaven?
What's going on here?
Then maybe if they weren't too stupid, maybe if they weren't too freaking brain damaged, they could take that experience back to their own neighborhood and maybe get with their neighbor.
Hey, Shanique, well, guess where I was today?
I was over in the white neighborhood over there over across town.
Man, what you be doing over there?
When she could say, hey, no, really, you need to come with me and you need to look at this, man.
Things can be different.
That's how you change your own neighborhoods, you freaking morons.
You don't blame other people because all that's going to do is keep you where you are.
That's going to keep you right where you are.
And then that's where you're going to belong.
You're not going to blame white people.
You're going to stop doing it.
Otherwise, you're going to stay where you are.
Do you understand me?
You need to tell your leaders.
You need to tell these moronic, idiotic commentators out there.
And they're mostly white talking heads and the news reporters and all the guilty white idiots out there.
You need to tell them to shut up because they're doing you more harm than good.
You need to tell Kanye West to go to hell.
You need to tell Alicia Keys and Beyonce to shut your pie hole.
You want to talk about privilege?
I think Beyonce, she's married to that freak who's made out of spare parts.
What's his name?
Calls himself Jay-Z.
They're like billionaires.
Well, that seems like kind of privilege to me.
I think he owns like an NBA team, right?
And she parades off and does these concerts, and she's completely, completely not talented.
She's an idiot.
And I don't get it, but whatever.
They're billionaires.
I see kind of a lot of privilege there.
She doesn't go home to the hood, does she?
But no, she wants to sing her songs about, I like my black heritage and blah, blah, blah.
Well, you're an idiot.
You wouldn't know what black heritage is if you tripped over it.
My guess is they don't hang around a lot of black people.
That's just my guess.
My guess is their 87-room, 9-million-square-foot mansion that's probably in Malibu or Beverly Hills, I'm guessing there's not a lot of diversity there.
I mean, as far as black diversity goes.
A lot of white people, probably.
You catch my drift?
And I can go on and on and on about where the privilege really lies.
But as I said, and I'm getting towards the end, it's not really privilege at all.
You're being victimized and you don't even know because you're stupid.
Wake up!
Okay, guys.
Getting towards the end of the show, there was a couple of things I wanted to share with you.
I have a little bit of time.
We'll get off of the conversation about race.
Here's something.
I have just enough time.
Supporters, opponents, this is supporters and opponents of Washington transgender bathroom rule protest.
That's right.
You heard it right here on the American Voice Radio Network.
Supporters and opponents of the state of Washington's transgender bathroom rule.
Supporters and opponents protested at the Washington State Capitol Monday over a new ruling allowing transgendered people to use the bathroom of the gender with which they identify.
The Washington Human Rights Commission ruled in December, buildings that are open to the public must allow transgender people to use restrooms and locker rooms of the gender they identify with.
The Human Rights Commission, now I'm going to, as soon as I get off the show here today, I'm calling my representative, and I'm going to find out just who they are.
I wasn't aware that bureaucratic agencies could dictate and make law, but apparently they can.
The opponents are gathered to promote what they call safe spaces for women and children.
Their goal is to share what they say are stories of sexual assault.
Look, I don't have to read the article.
Who thinks it's a good idea?
Let's just say, for instance, you know, I go down to the Capitol today, or tomorrow, right?
And I just will waltz into the woman's restroom, right?
And just whip it out, man!
Hey, what are you doing?
I'm peeing.
What do you mean?
I'm just going to the bathroom here.
I feel like a woman today, right?
Who thinks that's a good idea?
Well, it is a good idea in a screwed-up society, but see, in a moral and just society, it's not a very good idea.
Perhaps I'll talk more about this on Thursday.
Guys, there was something else I wanted to talk about, but I don't have time.
So there was several other things I wanted to talk about today.
So I want to thank each and every one of you for listening, guys.
God bless each and every one of you.
I will see you all on Thursday.
And remember, freedom comes from the sword.
See you Thursday.
you Bye.
I ended up running way long here, and there was a stack of stuff I wanted to get to this week, but also this week, Dylan Roof was sentenced to death in South Carolina.
His now-famous Charleston Vespers performance is one of those events which I'm kind of required to comment on since we were peripherally involved, even though I already have on several occasions since the young man did his thing 18 months ago, so let's give it another shot.
Now let's start with my usual Grandpa Simpson reference to my 48 years of involvement in this little sideshow of ours.
During that time, in addition to a lot of lunacy and a few laughs, I've seen more than my fair share of outright tragedy.
Roof isn't the first white man I have watched destroy himself like this.
Fred Cowan, Kenneth Neil Wilson, Buford Furrow, Ben Smith, Michael Page, Joseph Stack, Craig Hicks, and a dozen others whose names would mean nothing to people today.
Now, the standard reaction of your typical white nationalist fearless leader when something like this happens is to take off running like a jackrabbit and try to distance himself from the shooter, sweating in fear that this person's act might bring the suits and the badges to his door and that he might somehow be held legally liable for the behavior of someone that he most likely never met in his life, which in the toilet of the American judicial system is not an uncommon occurrence.
Well, we in the Northwest Front actually were associated with Dylann Roof's actions because we were mentioned in his manifesto.
Mentioned in a negative sense.
Roof, in fact, denounced and rejected the NF and the Northwest Imperative, which is a little detail that never made it into the mainstream media, needless to say.
I was referred to in one headline as the shadowy white supremacist who inspired Dylan Roof, despite the fact that Roof himself had said exactly the opposite.
Since then, I have repeatedly told you guys to not do this kind of thing.
Not because I'm trying to distance myself and the NF from Dylan Roof, the media wouldn't let us do that if we wanted to, but because I genuinely, honest to God, do not want you to do this kind of thing.
It accomplishes no change, and we are about change.
It is the pointless sacrifice of a racially aware white life for no practical gain at all, and it is vitally important that every act we commit in our lives must be subordinated to one overpowering consideration.
Is it good for the 14 words?
Does this action of mine bring the Northwest Republic and the dream of David Lane any closer to reality?
The Charleston Vespers of Dylann Roof did not.
These guys are our version of Islam's suicide bombers, but they are much less efficient because they're not directed towards any kind of political or social goal, however alien to Western eyes that goal might be.
Like suicide bombers, most of the people they kill are bystanders and totally irrelevant to anything as far as political goals or change goes.
All Dylann Roof did was to shoot down a bunch of old colored ladies in their church crowns.
Great PR for the cause there, Dylan.
It's true that he did bag some nigger state senator who was a big wheel with the local Democrats, but as nearly as I can determine, that was more by accident than anything else.
These mass shooting sprees are not bona fide acts of white resistance.
They are hissy fits, which arise from rage and frustration, humiliation and hurt feelings.
All of which feelings are perfectly justifiable, of course.
But the idea of acting out on them through a pointless act of self-destruction which achieves nothing is infantile, and infants don't change the world.
In essence, what Dylann Roof did was a tantrum, and once it was expended, he did what so many of his kind do.
He clearly had no plan of escape and hadn't thought five minutes beyond the end of his shooting spree, and so he simply got in his car and drove aimlessly until the highway patrol stopped him in North Carolina.
This is one of those cases where you really have to wonder.
What the hell was going on in that kid's mind?
What did he think was going to happen after he shot a bunch of the most politically protected minority in this country after the Jews themselves?
Was the boy just suicidal?
Maybe.
I don't know.
This doesn't mean that I have no sympathy for Dylann Roof.
I do.
If there was some way that I could take out those magic beans that you guys seem convinced I have hidden in my pocket and appear in his prison cell by magic like some genie and whisk him away on a magic carpet to the Northwest Republic, I would do so.
But I can't.
None of us can.
He's going to sit in a steel box for some years, and then he's going to be slaughtered, and there's nothing that can be done unless our new president really does turn out to be one of us.
The fact is, Dylann Roof threw his life away.
And right now there is almost no likelihood that we will ever be able to do anything to help him.
They're probably going to kill him.
There will be more Dylan Roofs if we in our wee little movement do not quit screwing around and get our act together as the rage and frustration of living in this cesspit of toxic waste, which is now our country, becomes overwhelming and more and more throwaway white boys react with this kind of tantrum.
White men who reach that point in life need a place to go.
They need a direction and a constructive focus for their righteous rage and loathing.
And it is up to the Northwest Front to provide that for them.
Dylann Roof knew about the Northwest Imperative but chose to reject it in favor of a hissy fit.
We have to do better than that.
And our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
▲
Export Selection