Jan. 5, 2017 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:04:57
20170105_rfn
|
Time
Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Push-a-woo, he'll push and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, a rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token whistle, up the marching tune.
Warrior pike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
Switch your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a man he chest was rubbing for the blessed warning light.
The waters passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
It's January the 5th, 2017.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Right, is everybody back from Grandma's house?
And is all the eggnog drunk or poured down the sink?
All the fruitcake thrown out for the birds?
You've taken down the tree and the lights and whatnot.
Good, because we need to hit the ground running and get back to work.
We've got a little over two weeks before the wild and crazy ride starts, and we finally get a look at just who the hell we put into the White House.
And I have to admit, even after watching him and what he's been doing for two months now, I don't have a clue.
I still say that in gratitude for saving this country and its people from the thing in the pantsuit, we owe Donald Trump at least some kind of honeymoon before we start screaming and hollering about being betrayed.
I figure it'll be maybe April or so before buyer's remorse starts setting in.
But that doesn't mean we give our new chief executive a total free ride.
I notice that already Trump and his team are distancing themselves from quote-unquote us.
I get that, kind of, and I certainly don't expect an invitation to arrive asking me to come to Washington, D.C. and smoke a cigar with the president in the Rose Garden while we brainstorm over the future of the country.
A honeymoon, a reasonable period of time to start keeping his promises, yeah, fine, but not totally uncritical.
There are certain signs that we need to watch out for.
I am especially keen to see if Trump will make any effort to carry out two of his promises in particular, both of which he seems to be backtracking on.
These are the famous wall on the border.
And at least some attempt to prosecute and imprison Hillary Clinton for her crimes.
If he does not lock her up, she's going to be back, and she's going to do more damage to the country.
If we get to May Day, and there is not even some token effort to make it look like he's keeping those promises, we'll know we've been had.
Another thing, I have grave doubts about this Steve Bannon character from Breitbart.
The left loons are shrieking that he's a white nationalist and supposedly one of us, but I can't see it.
This guy is my age, 63. He went to Georgetown University and Harvard Business School.
He's a former officer in naval intelligence who was at sea on some destroyer just barely long enough to get his feet wet.
And who then spent the rest of his career padding up and down the carpeted corridors of the Pentagon's inner depths as some kind of murky quote-unquote aide to some big-knob admiral.
Bannon then went on to become an investment banker for Goldman Sachs of all the goddamn things.
This is a white nationalist with that kind of resume?
No, I'm sorry.
This man has not paid his dues.
You know, in the old days of the Spanish Civil War and various communist takeovers, how the Red Guards or whoever who select people for execution would do so?
They would stop men on the street and look at their hands to see if there were scars and calluses from hard labor on them.
If someone had soft hands, he was assumed to be a capitalist or a bureaucrat of some kind or a bourgeois merchant type.
Somebody who worked indoors pushing papers or doing non-physical labor and they were taken away to the bullring or the sports stadium to be shot.
Stephen Bannon has soft hands, metaphorically speaking.
He hasn't worked or suffered for the cause he claims to represent.
It's obvious, with a resume like his, that he has never spent a day in his life short of money.
Never mind walking up and down a cold, rainy street knowing that you have to somehow find a job today and get at least a partial paycheck by the end of the month or else you'll miss the rent on your crappy furnished one-bedroom and, if it's not in by the third, the papers will be taped to your door on the fourth.
Now, from what I can tell from what little hard information is available about him on the net, Stephen Bannon from Breitbart has never had a wife and children in a home taken away from him.
Because he refused to say out loud that two plus two equals five, and grin and tap dance and shuffle while he said it.
He has never been punished because his mind is not under control by the monster that is America like some horrible little child picking the wings and legs off insects or setting cats on fire for fun.
Stephen Bannon has never lost a job or been evicted because he was exposed as being different from the herd, not of the body, so to speak.
Stephen Bannon, so far as I know, has never faced a beloved girl or woman who has been terrified into hysterics, into fearing and hating him because she was threatened with ostracism or poverty or violence unless she cast him out of her life and ran to the filth and fell down on her knees begging to be allowed to repudiate him so they would leave her alone.
Stephen Bannon has never had to live with the daily threat of criminal violence from niggers and crazy people egged on by leftloon media reporters and internuts.
He's never had his windows smashed and his tires slashed and his property vandalized and spray-painted.
Stephen Bannon, so far as I'm aware, has never had to get a concealed carry permit because a situation could well arise wherein he might have to defend himself with deadly force against some dumbass kid or stupid street nigger who has been egged on into assaulting him by some slimy little Jew hiding safely behind a computer screen.
He's never had to face the reality of waking up every morning knowing that today could be the day when he is either hurt or killed.
Or when he will be forced to hurt or kill someone who is nothing more than a stupid pawn simply because he dares to think forbidden thoughts and to speak and write forbidden words and ideas.
No, Stephen Bannon is not one of us.
He does not bear the mark of suffering which a white male who dares to resist in his heart and mind always carries.
Marks which are as visible as any bullet or whiplash scar to those who know where to look.
Stephen Bannon has soft hands, and no matter how close to the president he is, we can expect no help from him.
He is not one of us.
Moving right along here, you guys know how I hate crystal ball gazing, because we never seem to have enough data to do it with any hope of accuracy.
But I think that's changed somewhat since November the 8th in the sense that we can now make certain reasonable extrapolations based on limited historical parallels and based on observed behavior on the part of the major players.
Now, in a nutshell, I think the story of the next four years is going to be in part what Trump himself does, of course, but events will also be shaped by the Democratic Party and the deranged left.
What you might call the George Soros faction in world politics, the globalists, the true ideological one-worlders who are at long last showing their faces to the world, mostly Jewish faces.
I'm not just talking about politicians themselves like the Hildebeest or Angela Merkel or Francois Hollande, but the whole conglomerate of mainstream media, the academic world, the scientific establishment that has turned climate change into one big multi-billion dollar ATM for PhDs who would otherwise be teaching at the local community college.
I'm talking about the big Jew-run social media and online empires such as Twitter and Facebook and YouTube, Google and Amazon, the whole online lefty world of Salon and Hufflepuff and Politico, the massive government bureaucracies and the NGOs such as the National Educational Association and the Southern Poverty Law Center, plus all of their multi-farious counterparts in Europe and the English-speaking world.
Now, pardon me, I'm going to dash off a quick aside here.
I've been looking for a long time for a single term with which to designate this huge amorphous mass of all the evil people on Earth who want us dead.
Something short and snappy so that when I talk about our opposition I don't have to read off the whole grocery list I just read off.
And a while ago I remembered an ideal term which I'm going to run up the flagpole for you now to see if anyone salutes.
It's crisp.
It's snappy, it's spot-on, and it's catchy.
Now, there is one serious weakness, though.
It's fern.
It's a German word, and I have in the past discussed the extreme difficulty of getting Americans to glom onto and assimilate anything, any term or idea which sounds fern, especially anything European.
The term is the old national socialist word Weltfiend, or world enemy.
It was, I believe, invented by Dr. Goebbels during the Kampfzeit, the time of struggle in Germany, and I have seen Weltfiend used during World War II on some posters and in certain contexts.
I can't really say how extensively the word was used, but it's legitimate, and I think it pegs our dilemma down quite neatly.
We have the whole world against us in trying to murder our people and our civilization, so world enemy is a pretty good description, don't you think?
W-E-L-T-F-E-I-N-D, not F-I-E-N-D as in English, although I'm pretty sure it's pronounced fiend like in English.
Maybe some German speakers out there can correct me if I'm wrong.
You guys rolling around in your mind and on your tongue for a while and let me know what you think.
Anyway, wandering back in the direction of what I was saying, do not be fooled by the Brexit vote and the victory of Donald Trump, which appear to have been electoral.
Accidents or eruptions which caught the existing power structure by surprise.
That power structure is at least 100 years old, or maybe more, depending on how you want to define it and how far you want to go back to Adam Weishaupt or Robespierre or whoever.
Then there are the so-called conservatives, the Tories in Britain and the Rhinos here, the Republicans in name only of the Paul Ryan and John McCain variety, all of whom hate Trump worse than a polecat.
They hate him as badly as any Democrat.
Our people often forget that conservatives can be, and usually are, our worst enemies.
Remember, I was deported from Rhodesia on the orders of Ian Smith, not Robert Mugabe.
Remember, it is the Republicans and their corporate cronies who originally brought the third world immigrants here to provide cheap labor.
It was only later that the Democrats figured out they could give all those beaners and mud-colored beings welfare benefits and votes in order to create a one-party state run by Barry Sotoro and then Hillary Clinton, and the Republicans never did a damn thing to stop it.
Even assuming that Donald Trump is in fact sincere in his desire to drain the swamp, Rome wasn't built in a day and swamps can't be drained in a day.
These bad, bad people from the old power structure are still out there.
And they are very much still in power, deeply entrenched in their carpeted and air-conditioned offices in 10,000 glass and steel buildings, anchored like so many moray eels in their holes.
Again, assuming that Donald Trump really means to try and drag them out.
The next four years will be a battle kind of like Godzilla vs.
Rodan in the 1950s Japanese monster movie as the two monsters roar and bite and wrestle and claw at one another.
I have in the past used the term window of opportunity, referring to a time I believe is coming for us.
I think this may be it, and my nightmare has come true.
The window of opportunity is here, and we are no way ready to seize it.
We've wasted 50 years on too many dead ends and too many faux leaders.
But that's spilled milk and there's no point in crying over it.
So what now?
Well, we'll talk about that a bit later in the podcast.
For now, let's kick off the New Year's music with some skinhead rock.
This is Final War with Land of the White.
I
see a land of land so bare With a dosage so blue and so clean the air I see a land with no political mess I
see our race having more, not accepting less This is our land, this land I see This is our land where we're proud and free This is our land where we've won the fight This is our land, this land I see This is our land where we're proud and free This is our land where we've won the fight This is our land, the land of the white
This is our land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land where we're proud and free This is our land where we've won the fight This is our land where we've won the fight This is our
land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land where we're proud and free This is our land where we've won the fight This is our land where we've won the fight This is our land, this land I see This is our land where we're proud and free This is our land where we've won the fight This is our
land, the land of the white This is our land, this land I see This is our
land, this land I see This is our land where we've won the fight This is our land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land where we've won the fight This is our
land, this land I see This is our land where we've won the fight This is our land, this land I see This is our land, this land I see This is our land, the land of the white, the land of the white.
you you you Right, Gretchen's up next, but I need to explain a little something about her submission for the week.
A couple of weeks after November the 8th, Gretchen actually lost her job out there in New England due to the fact that she was apparently rather indiscreet about voicing her support for President-elect Trump.
Now, this is a fairly common experience for a lot of people I know.
There have been all kinds of instances of this recorded in the various internet media I look at.
I asked Gretchen to do an audio presentation on this particular incident, and she emailed me back that she would.
She did say that she would have to be very discreet about the details, and I told her, that's fine, I understand that.
And then I got her recording, and she was very discreet indeed about the details.
So much so that I think I need to kind of explain, before she comes on, exactly what this one is about.
Music Good evening, comrades.
Tonight we will take a break from our book reviews to discuss matters of a more immediate and personal nature.
The recent Trump election may be regarded by many as a miracle.
Granted, there are certainly pros and cons to this new development.
But, without a doubt, issues have been pitched to the surface.
This has created awkward relationships.
Family may become estranged.
Some have lost friends.
However, the most seemingly ironic loss would be that of a job.
Certainly, our candidate Trump has come across as a job creator.
Many voted for Trump with the idea that they would maintain or get jobs due to the election of Donald J. Trump.
Even so, the worst situation in this case would be finding work On the eve of the election, and losing it in nearly a fortnight.
Let us imagine a supervisor who hates Trump.
You come to work promptly every day, and you attempt to appear appropriately nonpartisan.
And indeed, this is not terribly difficult.
A white nationalist, or certainly a national socialist, is really, despite what the media may claim, Not the same as a Trump supporter.
Indeed, if you are of a revolutionary nature, you may wonder if the Trump administration is everything that the less informed assume.
For example, is a possibly increased nuclear arsenal the best thing for our separatist aspirations?
Do we want a stronger union?
Nevertheless, in the heady days of November, You may have found it difficult to repress your mirth, and even if you can do that, you may have felt some increase in your confidence.
If pushed by, say, a co-worker who may have brought up a subject, you may have spoken too freely, expressing your frustration, for example, with Angela Merkel, and your deep concern for Germany.
And in the fullness of time, you may have been asked by, say, a client, if you were a German.
No matter the answer, whether you are, in fact, German, or whether you are a Germanizable East Boltoid.
And I have spoken on this subject.
In fact, I once reviewed a book entitled Someone Called Eva on this subject.
The truth?
Matters little.
If you speak of fearing for the unique genome of Northern Europe, again, even if you did not specifically bring up the subject, but you were led to it in a conversation with a client who was interested in your ethnic background, you can go ahead and clean out your desk, if indeed you do have a desk to clean out.
Certainly, you may intellectually know better.
But even if you keep your right arm down and refrain from wearing an armband to work, it can be at times difficult to repress your ideology.
Certainly, I do commend the level of astuteness.
I am not sure how many realize this, no matter how obvious it all seems to me.
I am often able to control myself, but on a certain level, I do not make a great effort to conceal my identity, which I think should be clear enough.
And while it may be, in a sense, gratifying to be seen for what one is, I would warn any not versed in acting to keep familiar with the want ads.
You know, certainly...
Also, too, if you are in a situation where supervisors, for example, decide they do not want you, There is always the possibility that if you stick around, they will begin to accuse you of various things,
either various errors or even malfeasance, so it is probably best to get out of a situation before it becomes increasingly untenable.
I'm sure all of this is...
Obvious, no doubt, and no doubt Harold has stated this.
Under normal circumstances, of course, one is going to be, or one should be, much more closed-mouthed, which is what I normally am, and I know better, of course, at least intellectually.
But the window of discussion has been opened further than it normally is opened.
And there has been more temptation.
And this show, also too, has certainly loosened my tongue.
There was a time when I was much more reticent.
And as repressive as that was to certainly, perhaps you could say, my personality in general and certainly self-expression, I suppose in that state I was at least potentially better off.
Although I suppose I came across as, oh, people had different theories.
True or false, I honestly don't know.
But I suppose at the end of the day, as I said, I was better off.
So I just wanted to share with you my own experience.
I'm trying not to get too specific, but I suppose being slightly specific is unavoidable.
And I suppose, unfortunately, a story such as this, such times as these, is not entirely unique.
In fact, I wonder how many others there are in this situation.
So have a good evening, and thank you very much for listening, comrades.
And again, certainly I know better, although sometimes it is easier said than done.
So try to be careful, as difficult as that is.
Have a good evening and hail victory, comrades.
We'll be right back.
You know, in all the election stuff, one thing we haven't had any time for on this show for quite a while now is our renowned feature, Qui Custodiate Ipsos Custodes, or Who Guards the Guardians.
An intermittent segment of our wee little podcast wherein we chronicle the ups and downs and the quirky little lives and loves of our beloved secret police.
In the past, I've done coverage on the drunks in the Secret Service and Bitcoin thieves from the DEA and other agencies, but of course the greatest and most stunningly corrupt, incompetent, and murderous secret police agency of them all...
As always, Ben, you guessed it, the mighty FBI.
Come on down.
There's a man who leads a life of danger.
Everyone he meets, he stays a stranger.
Read every move he makes, another chance he takes.
Odds are he won't live to see tomorrow.
Secret Asian Man, Secret Asian Man.
They're giving you a number and taking away your name.
And what crazy hijinks are those yellow dogs and pants-suited Hillary clone bitches of the Bureau up to this week?
How about a little attempted murder and kiddie porn?
Dateline, December the 8th, 2016, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
This story is from WZZMTV, but it was all over up there in Michael Moore country, so here goes.
A Beaner FBI agent from out of town got drunk as a skunk and invaded a fitness center in a Grand Rapids shopping mall, waving his gun around.
Then when the cops were called and showed up, he A, fired at the police, and B, was so drunk he didn't hit anything with three shots.
I guess an armed police officer is a lot harder to hit than an old man standing in a snowdrift in Argon or a mother holding her baby in the doorway of her own home.
Grand Rapids police were called to Planet Fitness, 3681 28th Street Southeast, after receiving 911 calls about a man seeing brandishing a gun inside the fitness center.
Police say that FBI Special Agent Ruben Manuel Hernandez, age 35, fired three rounds at one Sergeant Neil Gomez, who was not hit.
Hmm.
Sounds like a Mexican standoff to me.
Police arrested Hernandez at gunpoint in a parking lot off of Lake Eastbrook Boulevard, southeast in Centerpoint Mall.
Special Agent Hernandez, an eight-year veteran of the FBI with a spotless record, was arraigned on two assault charges, including assault with intent to commit great bodily harm less than murder.
Hernandez's attorney claimed that his client was quote-unquote experiencing a kind of paranoid fit.
And has only a vague, hazy recollection of what happened.
Yeah, well, that usually happens when you're boiled as an owl.
Hernandez arrived in Michigan Monday afternoon from the FBI's Las Vegas office for an investigative assignment and was slated to return to Nevada today.
He is now in the Kent County Jail on a $70,000 bond for assault with intent to commit great bodily harm.
A 10-year felony.
And assault with a dangerous weapon, which carries a four-year term.
Hernandez is also charged with a misdemeanor offense of brandishing a firearm in public, which is punishable by up to 90 days in jail and mandatory forfeiture of the weapon involved.
Interesting little problem in gun control for the liberals there.
Does a drunken FBI agent get his gun confiscated, since it's not really his gun, but in theory belongs to the taxpayer?
Oh, here we go.
Hernandez, a married father of two, is believed to have been drinking.
You think?
Grand Rapids District Court Judge Michael Distel said if Hernandez is released from jail, he cannot possess firearms or use alcohol.
Well, that would kind of make it hard for him to do his job since he's a professional gunman for the dictatorship.
FBI agents aren't much use if they can't shoot people.
I mean, hey, never know when there's an old man or a mother with a baby or some other enemy of America who might have to be put down.
The judge was also talking about ordering that Hernandez be outfitted with an alcohol-related tether.
Hernandez was scheduled for a probable cause hearing on December the 20th, but I haven't been able to find out anything more.
I can tell you right now, as soon as he got out of jail, they whisked him out of state and he's never coming back.
I mean, this case is just going to vanish off the public record if it hasn't already.
The guy's not just an FBI agent, he's a member of a politically protected minority.
The worst that might happen to him is that he might get a punishment posting to Detroit or Newark or Anchorage, Alaska.
You know, I imagine the Bureau in Alaska is really pissed off at the suits in the J. Edgar building since their office appears to be where all the fuck-ups get dumped.
Okay, moving right along here.
This next comes from Gizmodo.com.
A new report from Ars Technica, whoever they are, on documents unsealed by the American Civil Liberties Union shows that the FBI may have operated 23 child pornography websites on the dark web.
We know, of course, that the FBI operated one of the biggest child pornography sites on the dark web, Playpen, for 13 days.
The FBI even went so far as to improve the performance of the site, making it run faster.
This was all in an effort to deploy what the FBI calls a network investigative technique, another term for this is malware, to discover the identity of people accessing child porn sites.
To access these sites, you have to do it through the Tor network, which anonymizes and obfuscates your identity.
The FBI's NIT was able to de-anonymize people accessing these sites, allowing the FBI to discover their IP address and other data leading to their arrest.
Okay, so much for this idea that Tor protects people from identification by the government.
I personally am of the opinion that, internet buzz and gossip and hype aside, there is no encryption that will prevent the FBI or other political police apparati from identifying anyone online they take an interest in.
My impression is that no operating system is now commercially available that does not have some kind of secret back door for the political police built into it.
And no encryption system that is truly unbreakable is allowed to be sold or possessed by anyone.
But I'll grant you this is not my area of expertise.
Anyway, back to Gizmodo.
Here is the key paragraph from the unsealed documents which seems to show that the FBI...
I need to warn you that I don't understand what all this means.
Anyway, quote, Such request data associated with a user's actions on websites 1 through 23 will be collected.
That data collection is not a function of the NIT.
Such request data can be paired with data collected by the NIT.
However, in order to attempt to identify a particular user and determine that particular user's actions on websites 1 through 23, and I'm losing it all here.
An FBI spokesman seems to deny this in a statement to ARS, but doesn't explain the documents that discuss websites 1 through 23. I would refer you to documents on the playpen investigation in which we seized and operated a dark web child pornography site for a period of less than two weeks, FBI spokesman Christopher Allen told RS Technica.
That was an extraordinary investigation, and to my knowledge may be the only time that has occurred.
So to suggest this is a common thing is patently not true.
Yeah, right.
Well, now we know what the FBI was doing all that time instead of properly investigating Hillary Clinton.
Speaking of computerized pornography, whatever happened to that Anthony Weiner individual, you know, the Jewish Democrat guy who was sending pictures of his schlong to underaged girls from a laptop that apparently also had 650,000 classified State Department emails on it from Hillary Clinton's tenure in office there?
I seem to vaguely remember something about that in the news.
But whatever happened on that story?
Hmm.
Secret Asian Man, Secret Asian Man, they're giving you another hobby, taking away your name.
Secret Asian Man.
Secret Asian Man.
Thank you.
Right, I'm gonna go medieval on your ass again.
This is a song called Roland's Quadet.
Which is an ancient Norwegian song about the fabled Saga of Roland.
And for those of you who aren't as up on your Aryan history as you might be, Roland was a knight of Charlemagne who died heroically fighting against the Muslims.
So I think this is a very apropos song for modern Scandinavians to be singing, even if the words are about 700-800 years old.
Anyway, this is the medieval trio.
This is the medieval trio.
La la la, la la la place A couple of times last month, I ran some audio from one of our comrades from Tacoma called Jay.
He has a podcast of his own called Condition Critical.
It's on American Voice Radio.
And I got a pretty good reaction from the segments from Jay that I ran on here.
I have to admit, I kind of like his style.
I mean, I know Jay.
I've met him several times.
He's kind of a blue-collar type individual.
And he's very...
Authentic, and that's how he comes across on these audio clips.
This is kind of the true voice of the people you're hearing here.
The kind of thing that you would hear your typical white guy run off at the mouth about in a bar, or at a Little League game, or in the Moose Lodge, or just in some private conversation in the break room at work.
I know during and before and after the election, all the left-wing lunatics and bloggers and whatnot kept saying, oh, what about the Trump voter...
Well, who are these people?
Why do they hate us so?
Who are these monsters who are going to take away the presidency from our beloved Hillary?
Did they just come out of the darkness somewhere?
Well, I think Jay is a good example of the kind of white man who simply has not been listened to by anybody for the past 40-50 years.
Like I said, he's a very authentic voice of the people.
And so here's some more of him.
All right, folks, good afternoon.
Hi, I'm your host, Jay Shanahan, and this is the Condition Critical Show for Tuesday, the 16th day of February, 2016.
And you are listening right here on the American Voice Radio Network.
Yeah, I'm live today.
This is my live show.
I didn't say that, so I'll say it now.
Tuesday, February 16th.
Okay, so where to start?
Well, you know, it's the same thing every week.
The news can get pretty repulsive, and they just bombard you with things.
I did something that I, well, I wouldn't normally do, and it wasn't on purpose.
At work, they had the presidential debates on.
Oh, this would have been on Friday, I guess, down in South Carolina.
Usually they have ESPN on or Gilligan's Island, but this happened to be on now.
I don't know.
Nobody was really watching it, so I'm standing there making coffee.
I didn't really watch it.
It was just kind of on, and I kind of paid attention to it a little bit on and off for about 10 minutes until I had to go.
What struck me was the atmosphere of the debate itself, like on television, and how it was being presented, and how the candidates, if that's what you want to call them, were going back and forth.
It was pretty embarrassing, really, to call yourself an American, and these are people that are running for the highest office in the land, and they were just going back and forth like a couple of schoolgirls, and my daddy's bigger than your daddy, and oh, you shut up, or my brother's going to do this, and blah blah, right?
And then the audience reaction was they've had to have had some kind of, you know, like in sitcoms that you don't see it, like these things above the audience that, okay, clap or do an ooh or an ah, you know, do some kind of gesture or, you know, some kind of emotion or something like that, because that's what the audience was doing.
And that's what struck me even more, was not just the candidates, because they're going to do what they do, and they are, but the way the audience was reacting.
It was like, well, I read a portion of an article a couple of weeks ago, and it talked about how these debates have kind of boiled down to, like, what was it?
Like a bad reality TV show.
And you know what?
That's kind of what it was.
And I thought, wow.
I mean, they weren't even talking about issues, and I say it every week.
They're just going back and forth.
Trump, too.
They're just going back and forth against one another, and it's just really pathetic.
So I just thought I'd share that with you, because I don't watch the debates.
I haven't watched any of the debates, and now I will make it a purpose to not watch the debates because guys are not saying anything.
So, anyway.
This week, though, I want to have another one of my conversations about race because they're throwing it in our face, guys, every day.
Now, I talked about that pig, Beyonce, who did the Super Bowl halftime show with her non-diverse cadre of black females, mixed race, and...
It's black, whatever.
The horde of whatever you want to call them, you know, at the Super Bowl halftime show.
And, of course, it got rave reviews.
Oh, she's so brave, and she's just so proud of her heritage, and blah, blah, blah.
Well, she struck again, because then she hosted Saturday Night Live, and I would have posted this in the chat room.
I'll try to do it later during the break, but it makes my computer go haywire because of the ads that want to pop up.
So just let me do it from another device, because it was freezing my screen.
Here's how Beyonce won Saturday Night Live last night.
And I'll just kind of read from it.
Just after Melissa McCarthy finished her opening monologue and Hillary Clinton serenaded some undecided voters with Bonnie Raitt's I Can't Make You Love Me.
I guess Melissa McCarthy may be that pig, that fat pig, who is a disgusting human being.
I guess she's a...
I don't know.
I guess she's one of those people on Saturday Night Live.
I don't know.
I don't watch it.
And then it goes on like this.
Saturday Night Live then ran a fake trailer for a horror movie called The Day Beyonce Turned Black.
Rated NC-17 for white people, and G for everyone else.
I haven't watched it, this trailer, and you can with this link, and I haven't.
And it goes on, and it's quote, for white people, and this is like a quote out of the trailer, for white people, it was just another great week.
We hear in a series of movie voiceovers as Americans go about their daily lives.
They never saw it coming.
They had no warning.
Then, the day before the Super Bowl, it happened.
Beyonce embraces her black heritage.
Panic is the headline after that.
Maybe this song isn't for us, wonders Bobby Moynihan's character.
Watch the trailer for yourself, and that's the end of it.
This is just one article where they're throwing this in our face, where they just expect white people to just, and white people are for the most part, and it's disgusting, and white people ought to be ashamed of themselves.
More white people need to be ashamed of themselves, and I'm going to make it my personal mission to shame these white people, to wake the hell up.
Here's another article out of USA Today.
Headline is...
Awkward, uncomfortable conversations about racism.
Worth it.
And it starts off.
Now I'm going to stop because I've read this article before the show, and I think it's a hoax.
I may be able to post this one for you while I'm reading it, but this one was making my screen go haywire, too, so just let me continue.
Over an elaborate, homemade Italian spread, her colleague's husband launched into a lengthy monologue on which he denigrated Jews, Latinos, African Americans, Mexicans, and lesbians.
Despite having guests that included two Jewish women, a lesbian, and bridal who was African American.
That's where I said to myself, uh, I call BS.
I'm sorry, no.
That's a bad movie script right there.
That didn't happen.
Good try.
Nice try, though.
Call me a cynic.
It goes on.
We were all just sitting there, looking at one another frozen, Bridal says.
Finally, after an hour and a half, Bridal went to the bathroom and looked in the mirror.
After an hour and a half?
After an hour and a half?
Okay.
She went into the bathroom mirror and stood there looking and said to herself, what are you doing?
She and her co-workers left, drove a block away, and got out of their cars to talk about what happened.
That happens all the time, doesn't it, guys?
Like, say, you're at a dinner party or over at your neighbor's house or down the street or across town, and, you know, something uncomfortable happens at a dinner party or a Christmas party or so forth, right?
And then you leave with your friends and your wife's friends and children and whatnot, and you drive a couple blocks away, and you guys stop and get out of the car.
That's what you guys do, too, right?
No, I don't think so, because this didn't really happen.
To talk about what happened, quote, we were stunned at ourselves for not saying anything, says Bridal, now executive director of the Scarnett, Scarrett Bennett Center in Nashville, which promotes racial justice through trainings and conferences.
is.
Racial justice.
You know, I wonder what racial justice is.
I know.
Let me interrupt there, because it's important to identify, guys, what racial justice is.
Okay, racial justice is when you burn down your town, your city, right?
And you loot stores, rob Walmarts, assault people of all races, genders, sexes, even dogs and cats.
Okay?
You burn cars, you flip cars over, you throw rocks at the cops, and blah, blah, blah.
You do all that because some black thug named Michael Brown gets justifiably put down like the rabbit dog that he was by the police.
That's racial justice, right?
That's what racial justice is.
But when Jessica Chambers, a white girl from Mississippi, and you can Google her, there's been no justice for her.
She made the mistake of dating racially.
I've said it before, that's a mistake, and she wasn't taught very well.
She made the mistake.
Well, she was tortured, set on fire, then of course she died by her black boyfriend, who has yet to be brought to justice.
See, there's no racial justice there.
I guess racial justice there is you ignore it.
You just ignore it.
Because if you were to go after the beast, the criminal animal that he is, that would be a racial injustice, I guess.
There's some further racial injustices out there.
I can point them out.
Oh, let's see here.
Here's just a couple.
Ashton Roberts, and this is recently, January 16th.
He's a white guy from Alabama.
He was shot to death at a fast food restaurant for no other reason, just because he was white.
How about Ashley Olson?
This happened this year as well.
January 16th.
Now, this was over in Italy.
She was an American from Florida who received two fractures to the skull and was strangled to death with a USB cord.
Well, she made a mistake, too, of dating interracially, and she got some racial justice, right?
Yeah, she got some racial justice.
So let me get back to, what's her name here?
Where was she?
Give me a second.
Yeah, what's her name?
Joycelyn Bridal.
Let me get back to her.
She talked about racial justice.
Let me find my place.
Here she goes.
Okay, here it goes.
A quote.
Everyone goes through this when they're sitting at the dinner table with family and friends, and you think you'll just let that comment go, because it's a social gathering, says Bridal.
For me, it was a defining moment.
I will never, again, not speak up.
I could have told him it was offensive.
I could have asked questions about why he was making those comments.
But I didn't.
In recent years, there have been calls for national dialogue about race and racism, prompted by everything from police-involved shootings of African Americans.
Now, they conveniently leave out the brutal murders and assaults that blacks perpetrate on whites every day.
How about the one that happened in the state of Indiana here just last year?
The wife of the white pastor who the three blacks went in, and they had been on a crime spree leading up to this.
They raped and shot her execution style with her newborn baby right by her side.
Have you heard any kind of national outcry about that?
Well, of course you haven't.
Of course you haven't, because white people are cowards and sissies, okay?
Let's start over from police-involved shootings of African Americans to the lack of diversity in our Oscar nominations to Beyoncé's Super Bowl halftime show and her new song, Formation.
And in this article, as I pointed out last week, there's a picture of Beyoncé, the pig, with her pig news, or not news, music people behind her, all females, all, as they like to describe themselves, as people of color.
I don't see any white people there.
No diversity there.
Because that's racial justice, don't you know?
It goes on, but often those conversations in day-to-day life can be awkward and uncomfortable.
Well, of course they are awkward and uncomfortable, because blacks don't like to hear that they're animals, and that they're pigs and bastards.
They don't like to hear that.
And white people, like I said, are sissies and cowards, and they're too afraid to face it.
So the article goes on.
Now, this guy, his name is, and he's an Indian, not a casino Indian.
He's more like a 7-Eleven Indian, if you catch my drift.
His name is Rinky Sen, President and Executive Director of Race Forward, the Center for Racial Justice, Innovation, and publisher of a news site, Colorness, says that sometimes the best way to begin a conversation about race is by asking lots of questions.
And here we go.
A few years ago, Sen was waiting in line at the Sundance Film Festival to buy tickets.
Sen, who is Indian American, began chatting with a white woman behind her.
The woman told her she had adopted two African American sons.
Well, she's an idiot.
She's a complete moron for doing so.
Anyway, she adopted two African-American sons.
Sen told her that she just did racial justice work.
I could comment further on that.
Sandra Bullock is like a piece of crap celebrity.
And there's others out there.
What's her name?
That woman that's made out of spare parts, literally?
What's her name?
Married to Brad Pitt.
Angelina Jolie.
She is.
You ever look at her?
She's like the Bride of Frankenstein.
For real.
She's made out of spare parts.
And they think it's a big deal to adopt and to...
I don't know what they think they're doing because it doesn't make any sense.
You know, that happens in Disney movies, like I said.
You know, hyenas don't go adopting lion cubs because the lion cubs grow up and eat them, right?
Anyway, the woman told Sen she had attended a two- or three-day race workshop and felt like she was hated by all the people of color there.
Well, of course you were, you dummy!
Of course you were hated!
If I hear white privilege one more time, I'm going to hurt someone, the woman told Sen.
Persen, whose career is devoted to openly talking about white privilege, the notion that white people have inherited advantages in American society, the response was offensive.
Well, it is offensive.
And it's just another one of those Marxist-Communist terms that they throw out there.
They just make it up, and it's white privilege.
I mean, white privilege.
I mean, let's just say that.
And we'll just try and shame everybody, shame these white people.
Well, it's working.
For the most part, it's working.
There's only like 17 white people that aren't afraid to speak their mind.
It goes on.
There were many, many times I wanted to roll my eyes during that conversation, Sen says.
But the interesting thing I noted was as we wound our way closer to the front, front of the line, that is, is that she'd say something not so great, and then, if I asked her a question, she'd talk her way in my direction, philosophically speaking.
At one point, she said she felt that white people see themselves...
Now, this is important, guys, this next part.
At one point, she said she felt that white people see themselves as individuals, and blacks and Latinos see themselves in groups.
I said, do you know why that is, don't you?
And she said, because we get to live lives as individuals, whereas they have always lumped themselves in with their group.
For people of color who may be offended or angered by another's remarks, sends advice is to lower the litmus test.
Now let me stop.
Let me go back.
Because you know what?
That's true.
Here's the thing.
Let me repeat that.
Let me find it again.
It says, and she said, because we get to live lives as individuals, whereas they, like the blacks and the Latinos and the queers and what all, they have to lump themselves in with groups.
And that is true.
I've said that before.
There's this thing called the lunchroom effect, where you go into a lunchroom and you'll see all the blacks, all the Asians, all the Mexicans, all the faggots and homos, right?
And then white people will just kind of be interspersed.
Because, see, white people, they can be individual.
They can go out and they can achieve things on their own.
Now, blacks can't do that, obviously.
So they have to mob up.
That's really what it is.
They have to mob up because they're too stupid to do things individually.
Not all of them, though.
You have some blacks out there like Thomas Sowell.
You have Clarence Thomas.
You have others out there that have branched out.
And what do they get called?
What was Clarence Thomas called?
What is Thomas Sowell called?
They're called Uncle Toms and all kind of derogatory names by the blacks, by the Al Sharptons and the Jesse Jacksons of the world.
Because they don't need to be lumped in with the group, because you know what?
They can go out and do things on their own.
And that offends the blacks, because all the blacks can't have that.
The only way blacks can get stuff is if they mob up.
They mob up and march down the street like they've done here just recently.
The Black Lives Matter movement has branched out, guys.
And I don't have the article in front of me, and I'm just going to, what is it, a little sidetrack here.
The Black Lives Matter movement, and it's a student-led movement from Garfield High School.
It's a majority black.
Savages High School up in Seattle, so they went down to Olympia yesterday and demanded.
They did.
They demanded more funding for school because they'd be needing books and stuff, and they'd be needing stuff so they can learn and stuff, and don't you know?
And that's what they said.
They were being interviewed, and it was unbelievable.
That's what they do.
They mob up.
Instead of just going to school, right, and learning, and that's hard to do in public school, I know, but you've got to make the best of it, right?
Do the best that you can and go out there in life and succeed.
That's how you do it.
That's how white people have done it, and that's how white people continue to do it.
But see, that'd be racist, and we can't be having that, don't you know?
And so you got the Beyonces of the world, and you got the Kanye West of the world.
What did he say recently?
He doesn't want white people buying his music or something like that.
Hey, man, no problem.
You got Alicia Keys in the past talking about killing white people and proudly wearing a necklace with an AK-47 on it.
You got all these instances where blacks, and look, I shouldn't have to point this out.
It really shouldn't have to be pointed out.
The media, if they were doing their job in this country, and our politicians, if they were doing their job in this country, would be pointing this stuff out.
You have black-on-white crime that is exponential, more, if you will, than whites-on-blacks.
You have blacks that rape white women at an astronomical rate.
Astronomical rate.
You can look at the FBI studies.
No mention of it.
Because if you did mention it, that would be racist.
You've got to resist it.
You have to resist it, and it's hard at first to do.
I know it's hard at first to do, but you have to do it.
You have to say, I'm not going to take this anymore.
I'm just not.
You can just shut up.
Turn off the Beyonce's.
Turn off the Kanye West with his big white wife.
What's her name?
Kim Kardashian.
That's another repulsive.
From hell!
The pits of hell, that person, that vile creature is.
Anyway, the article goes on.
Let's see, let me start over.
For people of color who may be offended or angered by another's remarks, sends advice is to lower the litmus test.
Expect people to be less than perfect.
People are going to say the wrong things.
They're going to be imperfect.
They're not going to know a piece of history that's critical to your family.
Hmm.
Oh, okay.
It goes on and on, and it talks about Asian-American.
Here is as Sue is an Asian-American recalled an interaction with a white female student in his class who interrupted him while he was talking about race.
The woman challenged Sue, pointing out that women are oppressed, too.
She was uncomfortable and resistant, almost as if she felt like Sue was accusing white students of racism, he said.
When these interactions happen, I will generally agree.
Sue said women are also marginalized in our society.
You know, it's just so transparent.
What's going on here?
You can be anything that you want.
Other than a white male.
If you're a white male, you are the scourge of us in today's society.
And we are being brutalized.
Every day we're being brutalized.
We're getting mocked and made fun of routinely in the news, in pop culture, in songs, on TV shows, in movies, commercials, walking down the street, grocery stores, you got magazines.
White males are being routinely brutalized.
And white females are kind of a distant second.
See, because here's the thing.
At the end of the day, they only see you as white.
They're going to get past the notion soon that you're a woman.
They're going to get past that and say, you know what?
White trumps it.
She's a racist.
She'd be racist.
And they're going to come after you too, white women.
Especially you moron white pigs that want to date black men.
You're an idiot.
And you're a race traitor.
And there's something wrong with you.
You have a screw loose.
That's just one article.
Let me find...
Oh, let's see here.
Well, that's something for maybe the second half of the show.
That was about Beyonce.
I'm having a hard time finding it here.
There was an opinion piece in the USA Today, and it went something.
It goes something like this.
Give me a minute here.
Let me see if I can find it one more time.
Again, I'm not using my computer to do this.
Here it is.
The headline here is, I'm getting close to break.
So I'll wait until after the break to talk about this, and then I'm going to move on to a couple other things.
But I stress, guys, I really stress this.
This whole, that be racist, and of course, we're different.
You know, when you want to just get down to brass tacks, I talk about this as well routinely, is that we're different.
We're not the same.
That doesn't mean that you get to go down the street brutalizing one another, but that is what's happening to white people.
It's not just not being underreported or something like that.
It's not being reported at all.
I mean, they go out of their way to not report the brutalization of white people.
I mean, it has to be something really bad.
And then they go out of their way to not make any mention of race, of the perpetrator.
They have to really, they won't post a picture.
They'll use code words like teens or youths or an unidentified assailant.
It's just the truth.
It's just the way it is.
And it's not the way it is when it's the other way around.
It's right out there, up front.
White guy.
And they try and look for something in the past.
He had a Confederate flag, maybe, when he was in high school or something like that.
Always, always trying to paint the white perpetrator out, which is rare, mind you.
It's rare.
Comparatively speaking, it's rare.
But like I was saying, they try and immediately try and point him out as being racist.
Well, I hear the music.
I will see you guys after the break.
I want to wind up this week's Radio Free Northwest with a few very, very carefully chosen words here.
I want to make something crystal clear.
What I am about to say is not any form of incitement.
It wouldn't do any good if it were.
White people have pretty much proven over the past 50 years that they can't be incited to anything involving personal risk or inconvenience.
So the whole question of me or anyone allegedly inciting something doesn't even arise in the practical sense.
Oh, I'm sure some U.S. attorney will go running to her bosses at the absurdly misnamed Justice Department, waving a USB drive over her head and screaming and hollering, We got him!
We finally got him!
And that's the risk I'm taking.
But even so...
Arresting and prosecuting me or anybody for supposedly inciting white people to actual real-world change involving personal risk and inconvenience on their part is about like prosecuting a scientific journalist for talking about cold fusion or antimatter.
Yes, it may be theoretically possible under highly controlled laboratory conditions, but it's not yet something that anybody with money and power actually has to worry about out here in the real world.
What I'm going to say now is to point out an existing condition that came into being during the recent election, having nothing at all to do with me.
I am simply going where plenty of others have now gone before me.
Not inciting, not conspiring, just batting a breeze that many others besides myself are now batting all over the internet and every paper publication that deals with politics.
Capisce?
One of the great taboos which has governed our lives in our wee little subculture ever since anyone can remember is what I once referred to as the struggle that dare not speak its name.
Armed struggle against the American dictatorship with a view toward taking away these people's money and power by force and transferring that money and power to ourselves.
For generations, revolution of the 1776 and 1861 variety has been literally unspeakable amongst us, and anyone who even dared to hint at it, such as the late William Pierce and myself among a lonely few, Was immediately assaulted by all of the fearless leaders and many furors throughout our tiny little movement with hysterical,
terrified shrieks that we were government spies, federal agent provocateurs, or we were working for the ADL or the SPLC, we were agents of the Israeli Mossad, I was the Grand Rabbi of Jerusalem, or else we're all simply insane.
But above all, we had to shut up immediately about all this violent stuff because we were now doing something that might make the government really mad and might cause knocks on doors and we'd get everybody in trouble for real if we didn't shut up.
I mean, this whole thing of ours for so many years has been based on this idea that the government understands that we really don't mean it.
Well, yeah, I kinda always did, but anyway.
Very few of you guys were around back in 1978 when Dr. Pierce first began serializing the Turner Diaries in his tabloid newspaper of the time, Attack.
I was.
And I can tell you, although now it's considered to be the pioneering work of white revolutionary fiction, correctly so, at the time, Pierce was denounced by just about everybody in the movement except for myself and a few others whose names would mean nothing to anybody today.
Of those who are still alive, I recall that Dr. Ed Fields kind of kept his distance, and David Duke outright denounced Pierce as either a fed provocateur trying to set us all up, or alternatively just some egghead deliberately trying to make trouble by talking about fantasies of violence.
Now, of all the major figures I'm aware of in our movement's history, since then, only Pierce, the late Joseph Tomasi, and myself have been willing to speak a revolution through direct action at all.
But in the months running up to the November 8th election, the great taboo was finally broken.
When it appeared that Donald Trump was unwilling to accept the results of a clearly rigged election that put the Hildebeest in the White House, and he had the billions of dollars and the millions of followers to do something about it if he so chose.
The left loon Soros world reacted with screams of horror that...
Trump was threatening for real civil war with guns and everything.
Now, my guess is he probably wasn't, but at least the word civil war in the sense of guns going off was being uttered in the open in the mainstream media for the first time by the Democrats and other Soros people.
Allow me to point out, they started it.
Once Trump won, the shoe was on the other foot, and it is the globalist Soros faction which is now threatening armed resistance and civil war, including God knows how many threats to murder Donald Trump on Twitter, which have simply been ignored by everybody, certainly ignored by Twitter, and so far as I know, by the Secret Service.
At least I haven't heard of anyone actually being arrested for threatening online to kill the president-elect.
I don't necessarily see everything on the internet, so if I'm wrong about that, someone please correct me and send me a link.
Anyway, the fact is that the cat is out of the bag now, although I suspect that at some point the dictatorship will attempt to thrust said feline back into the bag, possibly using me as a test case.
Over the next few months, I'm going to probe the limits of the speakable and discussable by way of returning the gun to American politics after a long absence.
I think the last time in this country's history anybody got really proactive politically in the Second Amendment sense was Chicago in the 1920s, when a man named Al Capone tried to make that town his own, etc., etc.
Although, as I recall, Capone's boys were actually bigger on bombs for use in elections than guns.
I seem to remember something called the Pineapple Primary.
Anyway, we'll see how that plays out.
But our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.