All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 25, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:03:03
20160825_rfc
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is the Radio Free Northwest Calling Show for August 25th, 2016.
And today we're going to be talking about life in the future Northwest Republic with reference to the Northwest Draft Constitution of 2006 and how we're going to create a white ethnostate.
Hello, you're on Radio Free Northwest.
Who am I speaking with, please?
Hello, this is Nate from Iowa.
Oh, okay.
All right.
You're the first caller, and so this is the Radio Free Northwest call-in show for August 25th, and our topic, more or less, for the evening is going to be crystal ball gazing, life and the Northwest Republic, regard to the various provisions of the draft constitution of 2006, so forth and so on, and how we're going to build a white ethnostate.
And, Nate, since you are the first caller, we do have some...
Questions here that were emailed in by some of the listeners, but since you're the first caller, you can have the floor.
What would you like to talk about as far as that topic goes?
Well, I guess I would like to talk about more of the economic side of the future and how we would handle money, such as interest and the value of currency and constitutes the value of currency.
What I'd like to talk about, and I have my perspective and opinions, and I'd like to hear yours.
Sure.
Well, in many respects, one of the most important Northwest novels I ever did was Freedom Sons, because if you've read the book, you know I went through a lot of this in that book, and probably the most important chapter in some ways in that book is the first one where I talk about the Constitutional Convention, where all these issues are addressed.
Now, I talk about the conversion to a Northwest currency.
Now, we're kind of hamstrung by the fact that we do not know the exact sequence of events whereby the Northwest American Republic or whatever independent nation is created here in the Northwest is going to come into being.
It could be at the end of bloody IRA-style campaign of the type that I talk about in my books.
It could be as the result of the Trump-Clinton Civil War, which may come when Hillary tries to steal the election on November the 8th.
of just general collapse, up to and including the Mad Max scenario with all the guys in the Mohawks riding up and down the road shooting at each other with crossbows.
And so that's kind of going to hamper speculation a bit, but assuming that we have enough order to institute a proper currency, what I would like to see happen is, first off, obviously the Rothschild banking system and the entire usury financial Bretton Woods.
structure as we've known it since the end of World War II needs to go.
We can't have a financial system or banking system based on usury and the collection of interest.
The financial powerhouse of the republic would need to be some kind of official central bank, but it would need to be a servant of the state, not its man.
There are a number of economic provisions I talk about in the Constitution and in my books that such an institution would play a part in.
Interest-free housing loans for young married couples, so forth and so on.
Anyway, I'm going to talk about the Constitution.
Anyway, the main thing I talked about in that chapter was a discussion that a lot of us have when we're talking about this sort of thing.
Do we have a precious metal-based currency or not?
And in my novel, we have sufficient access to precious metals to whereby we can have, say, a few gold and silver coins, etc.
but you have to have a paper money system basically because there isn't enough gold and silver to create enough money to...
I'm sorry, we've got another caller here.
And let's give this a shot.
This is Radio Free Northwest.
Who am I speaking with, please?
This is Half Crazed Mississippi Squirrel in Scopey, Mississippi.
Okay, Emily.
All right, let's see if we can get you into the conversation here.
One of our callers is a lady from Mississippi called Emily, and she actually emailed in a question beforehand, and it is as follows.
Okay, I have a question.
I understand that the Northwest Republic is to be exclusively white.
What is our plan for the Indian reservations and its occupants?
All right, now, I suppose at some point I have to address this issue, but there's a couple of things you need to bear in mind, Emily and the people that are listening.
Number one, there are people listening to this podcast who are acting on hostile agendas and who will use anything I say here to attempt to do harm to the cause and to do harm to our people.
Where I say something now and it can come back on me five, ten years from now.
So, let me just state that the Northwest American Republic is going to be entirely white.
No non-whites of any kind will be allowed to reside here.
That is in the Northwest Constitution.
Article 1 something or other.
And beyond that, I do not feel at this point that it would be politic to comment.
One of the things I've said earlier is we don't know...
Exactly the circumstances in which the Northwest Republic is going to come into being.
I can't say for sure how exactly an all-white ethnostate is going to be achieved.
All I can say is that it will be achieved.
And this is one of the problems with crystal ball gazing.
There is a tendency to get relaxed and lapse into speculation.
And all of a sudden at some point in the future, possibly in a courtroom, that speculation comes back to bite you.
So let's just leave it at that.
The Northwest American Republic will be a homeland for all white people the world over, but only white people.
Okay, now we've got...
Can I make a little comment here?
It seems perfectly politic to suggest that they might want to immigrate Mm-hmm.
States.
Yeah.
If I was an Indian, I would not want to live in a country where...
All other considerations aside, there would be none of the massive welfare programs that keep the American Indians afloat, and none of the casinos that keep them afloat.
There would be a very large disincentive for any Indians to attempt to remain in the Republic once it is created, and beyond that, again, we're just going to have to see how it shakes out.
See, that's the trouble with a lot of this crystal ball-gazing, Charles, we're talking about the Constitution, the draft Constitution, which you hopefully have read by now, either in your white book or on the website.
We're talking about building a future white ethnostate.
There is something I suppose I should mention.
When we first started with all these tech problems, a guy named Nate from Iowa called, and he asked about the...
I know a lot of our people are really into money.
Currency and fiat currency and Federal Reserve and gold and silver and all this sort of stuff.
And he wanted to know about our setting up the economic system in the Northwest American Republic.
And I've covered that in the first chapter of Freedom Sons, to some extent, as to how a new economy was set up for the Republic during the Constitutional Convention there after the Revolution.
The Rothschild usury banking system has to go.
We cannot have any form of usury or, in essence, Jewish banking or Jewish money power anywhere in the Northwest Republic.
We will need a state-controlled bank to deal with all our financial needs.
A good model for this would be the National Socialist Financial System set up by Helmar Schoch during the Third Reich that uses a system of trade credits and whatnot to avoid all the borrowing of money.
From Jewish banks all over the world that finances world trade even to this day.
Then we see we would need to set up our own currency and hopefully we will have enough precious metals, gold and silver, so that we would be able to have at least some actual gold and silver coinage.
But this is one of the main things.
We're just going to have to wait and see how it plays out.
Okay.
Charles from San Francisco, did you have something you wanted to talk about related to the future of Northwest American Republic?
Well, I think we're all talking about the election coming up in November.
Do you believe, and everybody else, do you believe that Donald Trump will help us out?
The Duke show earlier, they're showing Trump is ahead by 91% to maybe as much as 9%, for Hillary, that is.
Yeah, what I've read, that comes from a survey of social media, and of course that's raw data, but it does indicate an incredible imbalance between the two that favors Trump.
You know, I saw something on Facebook recently, and I thought it was highly illustrative of the same thing, where it said, go to Trump's page and see how many of your friends have clicked like on that page.
Make note of the number.
Then go to Hillary's page and make note of that number.
And I saw no one who had a lead for Hillary.
No one.
Yeah, but those are your friends.
Your friends are probably not liberals.
Yeah, there is a general polarization in the country, and I'm not the only one to have noticed this.
We are quite literally dividing into two warring tribes, Charles, what were you saying again?
I've heard that the real poll results show Trump way, way ahead, and it's reflected also in the crowds that are attending Trump's rallies free of charge at their own expense.
They have several tens of thousands, and Hillary has maybe a handful of people Oh, yeah.
Well, it's getting pretty obvious.
There was an article in the New York Post by some columnist the other day where he was talking about the way that the media was acting, and he says, look, this is just ridiculous.
We are losing all our credibility.
No one believes us anymore because it's just obvious we are completely, totally in the tank for Hillary.
It's obvious.
I mean, Trump is holding rallies with 15,000, 20,000 people.
He's filling up whole sports stadiums.
They're lining up outside and they can't get in.
Hillary is lucky if she gets 300, 400 people at one of her little functions.
She can't even fill a basketball court at the local high school.
school.
I haven't heard one person's anything good about her, including her own family.
No.
I'd like to chime in here with something.
I took my own poll.
I took my own survey.
In the past three months, I've traveled to Oh, about nine different states.
Nine different states.
And I want to record a sighting.
I saw one.
One sign for Hillary.
Everything else is Trump.
The only other two signs I saw with Hillary's name on it was in Pennsylvania.
I saw two signs that said Hillary for person.
And it's no lie.
There's one sign.
Greg, you say you're from Buffalo?
Indeed, I am.
Okay.
Water and bread.
Weird.
Okay.
I'll tell you what.
The topic is supposed to be life and the creation of a new ethnostate here in the Northwest.
Have you looked at the website or looked at your white book and read the Northwest Constitution?
Yeah, I read the Constitution.
I mean, I'm very grateful.
Yeah, I was reading.
I read the Constitution.
I'm reading it, going over it, letting it seep in and distill.
And using my trusty dictionary, thank you for I learned of what emolument means and I'll throw road.
And I'm one of those little cats who reads with a dictionary.
I see nothing wrong with it.
I think it's very orderly, logical, and in accord with the nationalist beliefs.
I don't have anything to nitpick about.
It seems the only thing that struck me is where the capitalization will come for the security forces or the medical treatment or things along that line, infrastructure maintenance.
Well, we did have some people emailing in questions beforehand.
Comrade Bill from Spokane sent in a couple, actually.
One of his questions was, the NAR's proposed Constitution's Bill of Rights says all citizens and residents of the homeland have a right to adequate medical care, food, clothing, shelter, education, and employment.
Does the Constitution promise too much, which may result in a tyrannical nanny state?
I know we won't have a lot of resources at the get-go, which will limit the Leviathan for a time, but a nation of white people is going to become a rich nation, and the governments of rich nations tend to grow.
I get his point.
There is going to be a problem in preventing the government of the...
Okay, we've got Chris from London here, and I actually managed to get him in here without cutting anybody off.
Okay.
Chris, I was talking about...
A question that one of our people emailed about the Northwest American Republic and how we're going to prevent it from turning into a nanny state.
Let me just interject.
I don't think it's a right.
Healthcare is a right.
I don't think that supposes a nanny state.
No.
It is in the interest of the state and the interest of society that its citizens have adequate medical care because obviously they can't...
function in a productive manner if they're sick or if they've got all sorts of strange diseases they picked up from the third world or from eating contaminated purposes by so many Americans do.
I basically live in that third world right now.
The only healthcare that other than the wealthy class here have is basically black market.
I personally have treated methicillin-resistant staph infections in my home and I'm not medically trained.
I know what you mean.
In fact, I have at home made my own colloidal silver using my own setup.
I will tell you the secret to making good colloidal silver is to heat the water to just below boiling before you turn on the current.
I think a lot of the medical problems would be solved.
I think we're kept from a lot of Good medicine, just as the lady said, that you could do yourself at home.
But you can't buy a hypothermic needle.
You know, everything has got to be a description.
You've got to go through the doctor.
Yeah, the AMA has to get its cut.
Yeah.
Yeah, a place like here, you have so many that can't get those supplies that the few who can, of course, they get it through the government, so they have three times more than they need, which they then turn around and will resell or even give away.
A little free enterprise there.
Which is where I get the hypodermic needles I use.
I have a statement about that.
I'm retired from the military.
I'm in my 60s now, so I need my health care.
That's why I want to live close to a military base.
I look on the map, and Seattle was a couple.
There's Madigan.
We're in Fort Lewis, and I don't know what else.
There's a little ample military in the area.
Well, we've got two VA hospitals in the area that the veterans go to.
One is over in Seattle itself, in the city.
The other is down in Tacoma, in a place called American Lake.
The care there in the VA here, from what I've heard, in this area is good.
But the trouble is accessing it, because there are just tens of thousands of veterans now, and...
They've all been forced back into the VA system because, basically, of the depression.
They can't really afford private health care or their employers no longer give them private health insurance, etc., etc.
And so the system is becoming overloaded.
And it's, frankly, a bureaucratic mess.
Not so much the fault, like, say, of the doctors and the nurses.
I've had nothing but good reports about those.
But it's just the fact that...
You're not dealing with a health care institution.
You're dealing with a federal bureaucracy.
And that's a big problem.
But in the Republic, for one thing, we won't have a body like the American Medical Association calling the shots on health care and running it as a racket in order to make sure that doctors can drive Porsches.
Now, I agree that a doctor should be a respected member of the community.
He should be well compensated for what he does because what he does is important.
But I do not believe that doctors have some sort of automatic right to be, you know, millionaires by the time they're 35 or whatever.
Another thing that we will not have in the Northwest Republic is a greedy, massive pharmaceutical industry that keeps pumping up everybody with all these weird drugs that you don't need.
Like, I don't have a TV, but I watch YouTube, and I see these ads for, take, you know, Festarol for your restless leg syndrome or something.
By the way, the side effects include leprosy.
Death.
Your nose turns green.
And then six months later, if you or a loved one have ever taken...
Yeah, exactly.
I mean, I look at some of these ads, and they're reading off all this long list of horrible side effects, and I wonder why on earth would anybody ask their doctor about taking something like that?
And we've got another caller.
Hang on just a minute.
Okay, and we've got Idebro with us.
All right.
Idebro...
We're talking about life in the Northwest American Republic, and we got off on medical care and the constitutional guarantee in the Northwest Constitution of adequate medical care as a right.
And what I was saying is a lot of the good things about life in the Northwest American Republic will be the absence.
of the crap we've got in this country right now, including things like the American Medical Association as this kind of big, huge medical lobby that calls the shots for the personal profit of its members, the pharmaceutical industry that keeps trying to pump people up with all these weird, poisonous drugs.
But I believe that we will have in the Northwest Republic medical schools, say four-year schools, that will turn out competent general practitioner-type doctors.
Very little of this business of specializing.
Right now, a young man wants to become a doctor.
Usually what they want to do, if they want to make money and they don't want to have to deal with the unwashed, 30 million illegal immigrants, is they specialize.
And we need, I think, a lot more GP, good old-fashioned, sawbones-type doctors and a lot fewer specialists.
I also believe that trained paramedics and nurse practitioners can do about 90% of what doctors need to do in most cases.
Also, we will have a productive white population, so we will be able to set up a national health system that actually works for its people.
I am not averse to charging people something for medical care.
If someone helps you, a nurse or a doctor or someone in a hospital helps make you well, helps make your child well, I think they do deserve compensation for that, and I certainly would not object to paying for such services.
But this business of having to mortgage your house in order to keep grandma alive for another two or three years is just, you know, that's...
The system was broken before Obamacare, and Obamacare pretty much smashed it to pieces.
But all things are possible in an all-white nation.
Very true.
Amen.
I agree.
I agree.
Okay.
Hey, Harold, did you say Otter Bros on the file?
I have another little query.
Are we going to be autarkic?
Autarkic.
You mean a totally self-contained economy?
Did you say that?
Autarkic, yeah.
The Northwest American Republic will probably be forced by circumstances to have a more or less self-contained economy.
I saw in Rhodesia that that can kind of work just as long as you don't lose all your contact with the outside world.
Rhodesia basically went down when South Africa betrayed us.
And all of a sudden they were going to be...
Completely, totally isolated, surrounded by nothing but hostiles, and they couldn't get anything into the country, and they hadn't been able to develop their industry to the point yet where they were self-sufficient.
But that's one of the reasons why the Northwest American Republic or any white ethnostate has to have a coastline.
It cannot be completely blockadable because it's surrounded by hostile territory.
So these people who think they're going to set up some kind of white enclave in Peoria, Illinois, or someplace like that, they've got another thing coming because you can't maintain a viable society if you're surrounded by completely hostile territory.
But yes, the society...
I got family.
Yeah, I agree.
Yes, yes, he's with us now.
Idebro, are you there?
Yes, I'm here.
Okay.
Yes, I'm here.
Can you hear me?
Yeah.
It's got a quick question off-topic, though.
I'm looking at Mountain Home.
How's that for the area to live in?
I'm not familiar with Mountain Home.
I'll tell you a bit about Boise, but that's about all my experience in southern Idaho.
Oh, okay.
Thanks.
Well, Harold, let me ask you something.
Where do you think that, hypothetically, there might be less than smooth sailing with a new Constitution?
In the first...
Chapter of Freedom Sons, I talk about the Constitutional Convention, and this is something that's going to have to happen.
The document that we're using right now, the one that's on the website, the one that's in the white book, is a draft.
It is basically a series of suggestions.
Again, we do not know exactly how the Northwest American Republic is going to come into being, and the men and the women who actually cause that to happen, the men and the women who give up their blood, sweat, toil, To bring this country into existence, they are the ones who will decide what type of constitution this country has.
And I'm hoping that they will use this 2006 draft as a basis or foundation for whatever final document they come up with, because this was not just Harold sitting there making stuff up.
This was done in consultation with about a dozen top nationalist thinkers, including some of the order men, like David Lane and Bruce Pierce.
But they may come up with something totally...
They may just decide to go right back to the 1787 United States Constitution, which was a perfectly valid document for the society it was meant to serve, and which could still work quite well in an all-white society.
So we don't know exactly what the final result is going to be.
This is why I call this crystal ball gazing.
And we don't know what the conditions of life will be like for the first couple of years in the Republic, and so a lot of this is just very much speculation.
Oh, all right, all right.
Well, you know, I mean, look at progress, because much like our nation, founded on the Articles of Confederation, and then when problems arose, they had to be addressed, and we got Madison's Constitution, as I recall.
But no, I thought it was very well done, very well written and presented, and I had nothing cold with me.
You know, nothing was yanking at the old subconscious, as it were, of my body.
I just, I thought it was very well done and thought out and presented, very cogent.
I went to William Preston.
I sometimes am overly critical, but good job.
I haven't had any questions.
I almost never get any questions about the National Honor Court and dueling for some reason.
I think people must have missed that section or something.
That makes perfect sense.
I did wonder about corporal punishment.
Are we going back to flogging?
I can't remember off the top of my head if there is any reference to corporal punishment in the Constitution.
I had a discussion about this once with one of our comrades, and he was actually in favor of it because he stated, okay, look, we don't want to make prisons like the Americans do, because once you start down the road of imprisoning people, you get into this whole moral issue of...
Just exactly where the line is, where cruel and unusual punishment really starts.
At what point does the state cease to be the state and become a sort of a monster?
And I am absolutely agreed that there must never in the NAR be anything that remotely resembles the prison system.
This present regime, we've got no gulags, not even any duck cows or anything like that, because in a sense we're going to be fighting a revolution to get rid of those things.
Also, we will, in an all-white society, Physically able to work is going to be gainfully employed one way or the other.
And I suspect that will happen, especially at the beginning, because there'll be such a labor shortage that anybody who wants one can get a job.
And that right there eliminates a lot of crime and a lot of deviant behavior.
But even so, there will always be a small number of people who just don't get the message or who commit crimes of various sorts.
And there are times, and this is what this other guy was saying, there are times when you have to do something, Unless you want to create a prison system and lock people up for so many years, what do you do?
But their crime is not enough to merit execution.
And he was seriously suggesting that we substitute or that we institute a corporal punishment.
So, I don't know.
Well, let's get to doing.
Doing would be a good way to settle it.
That's in there.
I don't, like I said, people must say?
Yeah, oh yeah, I know it is.
I know.
I thought you were jostling my memory.
I'm not a young man.
I reckon you are where we are, both of the same generation.
I've got about five or six years on you.
But I was brought to fight by my dad in the second grade.
Now I understand.
I talk to people.
Young men in the military that come in, they have no experience on fighting.
You know, schoolyard fisticuffs, fighting, punching.
And I think now, I say, well, dueling might be...
Beyond them, if they don't have a certain amount of aggression.
Well, it's one of the social arts that our institutions are going to have to reacquire from our past.
The purpose of dueling, frankly, is, well, twofold.
The first thing, it's a substitute for civil litigation.
This business of right now, if somebody's done you wrong in some way, you think somebody's done you wrong, you go running to find some Jew lawyer and sue them, and you make a mess.
That ends up with nothing but hundreds and thousands of dollars in the pocket of these Jew lawyers.
I wrote an article once called The Law is an Ass, where I stated, quite frankly, that the purpose of the entire judicial system in this country is to make money for lawyers, and I stand by that.
And yet, obviously, we do have to have some means of resolution of personal disputes.
I say the first reason for the National Honor Court and the dueling system, as I say, is a substitute for civil litigation that does not just basically destroy...
Families and destroy the households financially for the next 20 years.
I think about the worst thing that can happen to almost anyone in this society is getting dragged into the legal system.
But the second reason for the dueling system is one of the main problems in American society today is that there is no penalty attached to being an asshole.
There needs to be.
Carol, I have a question.
Yeah, yeah, go ahead.
Okay, so it's Hiderbro.
So my question is, since lawyers are really banned, I was curious as to how case law would play into the judicial system.
Okay.
First off, again, one of the references in my novels in several cases is that new migrants are handed a book, fairly thick, but not hugely thick, and he's told that these are our laws.
There are not many of them, but the ones that are in here you have to obey.
Cicero said that the existence of many laws is the sign of a corrupt society.
And so there need to be a few basic laws in the Northwest American Republic.
Simple stuff.
Don't shoot people in the back.
Don't burn down houses just to watch the glow.
Don't rob liquor stores.
There needs to be a few simple laws regarding things like inheritance, land conveyancing, traffic law to some extent.
Just the basic things that society needs to function and that's all we need.
If you'll note that later on, when it gets into the National Convention, as it's referred to in the Constitution rather than Parliament, a large function of the National Convention is not so much to pass laws, but to administer the government.
Could I ask that question?
Yeah, sure, go ahead.
To what extent would the Northwest American Republic abolish the legal profession?
Would it be completely illegal to interpret contracts, for example, as a profession?
Okay, my fantasy.
I'm playing if I were king right now here.
The Constitution itself forbids anyone from accepting anything of value for performing a legal service, be it interpreting a contract or what.
And that leaves a lot open now.
Like, for instance, in ancient Rome, certain people like Cicero and others made their reputations in the law courts as advocates, either as prosecutors or defense attorneys.
And in theory, they weren't supposed to...
Except any gratuities either.
Of course, it didn't work out that way, Rome being a very corrupt society.
Harold, I think he may be asking about private arbitration.
The main purpose of the prohibition against a legal professional is to prevent the growth of a class of lawyers, people who do nothing but make their living off the law and off legal disputes.
And basically create the mess we have today.
Yes, there will have to be a certain amount of law, like say contracts for when you buy or sell land, or just the basic stuff.
There have to be certain basic rules of conduct that everybody accepts.
There will have to be a method of administering these, and there will have to be a method of dealing with breaches of these procedures.
I understand that.
But what must not happen is we must not end up with the very same thing that we've got today, where I think there's 3 million lawyers in this country.
Yeah, go ahead.
How would someone in the republic initiate foreign investment without ability to notarize?
I would not consider a notary to be an attorney or a lawyer, someone who actually makes their living off the practice of law and basically off...
Frankly, feeding off human misery.
The service that a notary provides is something different.
It is something necessary to the process of society.
And basically, a notary would be providing an actual service.
Again, I think the distinction between the lawyer and the notary would be that the lawyer makes money off someone's pain and misery, off someone's death, or so forth and so on.
And again, there are just entirely too many of them right now because there are entirely too many laws.
I don't think it'll be as much of a problem as you might think because, again, we're going to have to strip down to a very bare minimum of laws.
I'd like to make a comment here that directly addresses something you said, and that is contracting with foreign countries.
And I think the answer there is if you need a lawyer to do that, the problem would be in the foreign country, and you would contract with a foreign lawyer in that country to handle that issue.
Yeah.
The thing is, when you notarize documents in the UK for foreign investment, you have to be notarized at both ends.
So you take the document to the foreign embassy, and you also take it to the foreign and commonwealth office, so both sides can compare legal contrasts.
Well, I would have no objection myself to having someone in the Northwest Republic serve as a notary.
A notary is not an ambulance-chasing lawyer who basically provokes.
The lawyer is essentially parasitic.
A notary is not in that that is a legitimate service.
There are going to be people who make their living in connection with the law and with, say, the judicial system or something like that.
Like court reporters.
Yeah, like court reporters or whatnot.
But again, there are two prohibitions in the Northwest Constitution, one against lawyers and one against a professional clergy.
The object of those prohibitions is to prevent these two classes of people from ever arising.
In the Northwest American Republic and ever interfering in the political process and ever making people miserable and doing harm in the way that they do in this society.
Once that general purpose is acknowledged and more or less achieved, we will find a way to do what needs to be done with reference to the law or contracts or foreign investment or banking.
In a way, the same thing with banking.
Would you have professional judges, say if you had an indictable offence and that went to a higher court, would the person presiding over the court be a professional judge or would they be a professional judge?
That actually is provided for in the Constitution.
The term judge is used.
In fact, there's one of my favorite lines in there.
It was suggested by one of the order men, or my favorite articles, is that in a courtroom situation, at no time will the judge ever be seated higher than the defendant or the jury or the rest of the people in the courtroom.
Look, we're going to have to have a criminal justice system.
White human beings are still human beings.
You're going to have criminals.
Let's face it, there will be white trash that breaks the law or does harm to the community or generally shows their butts.
That's going to happen.
It happened in the days when we were all white from the Middle Ages on.
So we're going to have to have some kind of judicial system.
I don't deny that.
What we cannot have...
Is the legal profession as a class exerting influence or a detrimental effect on society, as is the case right now?
I'll tell you another problem we have with lawyers in this society.
Almost all of our professional politicians, including the Clintons, blast them, are former lawyers.
Law school and the legal profession is often the gestation period for these god-awful professional politicians.
Harold, I'd like to say something.
I think, again, when you have like-minded people living together and working together with a life script that's based around your race and the Constitution, I think a lot of this stuff goes away and gets simple.
Like you said, all a notary does is whoever signs the agreement makes sure that that's the person signing the agreement.
So I think a lot of this stuff would be simplified if we get like-minded people, white people, working, cohabiting together, dealing with each other.
I think a lot of this stuff will go away.
We will all be amazed at what an all-white society can accomplish.
Yes, yes, I think so.
If I could just crystal ball gaze here for a second.
The one thing that bothers me is, okay, there's trouble in the country and the republic comes into existence because there's enough people there to sustain it, to stay sustained.
Because once you declare that you're outside the jurisdiction of the United States government, you're not going to be able to get to import things into your area so easily.
There's going to be skirmishes on the border.
How are we going to make a living if they cut the power off?
I think one group stands out in my mind that does very well and stays The Amish are kind of self-contained.
They work amongst themselves.
I just hope when the Northwest Republic comes physically into existence that we can survive because we'll be fighting for our existence and somehow trying to raise a family.
And we know we need more white people.
That's why before you guys were talking about dueling.
It's not going to be like something that happens every day.
And also, I suspect that that's going to be part of the Republic's later development.
Could I just ask another question, if I may?
In the Constitution, it says that the executive branch of government assumes the status of magistrates.
Does that mean that the executive branch of government will be able to overturn judicial rulings?
Okay.
I meant to bring my white book with me so I have a copy of the Constitution, but the thing is that I do know that there is something else in there somewhere that states that the purpose of the judiciary is to...
We serve as a finder of fact in criminal and other legal cases.
The judiciary in the Northwest American Republic has no constitutional role.
In the American system, a judge can declare a law passed by a state legislature or by the federal government unconstitutional.
and in theory abolish that law just with a bang of his gavel.
That will not be able to happen in the Northwest American The Constitution does specifically state, at some point in there you will find reference to something called the Constitutional Committee of the National Convention.
It will be a committee or board of the people's elected representatives, deputies to the National Convention, who will deal with constitutional issues and who will rule not so much on the laws that the convention itself
passes, because hopefully our convention will not pass laws that are unconstitutional, but they will rule on the constitutionality of an old law, an event, an act, something that the government has just decided to do for some reason, and there will be a mechanism whereby that can be referred to the Constitutional Committee.
What I can see is if some future...
which it would be.
You get the idea.
The judiciary, the judges, and the legal profession in the Northwest American Republic, such as it is or such as it will be, does not have a constitutional or political role.
The purpose of the judiciary is purely to deal with the law and in criminal and what civil cases might exist to determine fact.
That's all.
Would the citizenry like in Switzerland have lawmaking powers via the referendum initiative?
Yeah, that's in there.
I know there are.
Actually, I should have reviewed it before I came out here, but it's been a long time since I've actually sat down and read the Constitution, but I do remember there is a provision for referendums.
Actually, it was Eric Thompson.
The first echelon of government in the Northwest American Republic will be the citizens.
Now, not every adult white male in the Northwest American Republic will be a citizen.
Most of them will because the minute a young man completes his military service or a young woman completes her national service in the labor service, the minute a woman has, say, three children, she automatically acquires citizens.
A young man gets out of the army, and along with his discharge papers, he gets his third-class citizenship papers, so he has one vote.
And so he is now a citizen.
He is now a participant in the body politic.
That is what a citizen is in the Northwest American Republic.
He's not just some dude who hangs out at a drugstore or anything like that.
He has a legal, political status.
So they, you might say, will be the foot soldiers of the state, the citizens.
There will be elections, but it is the citizens who will vote, those who have demonstrated through their acts and through their lives that they are committed to the state, committed to the white society, and have presumably, because their citizens, demonstrated the necessary cop-on and ability to study the issues and so on.
So then...
Would the referendum initiative have the power to strike down the...
Any time you're designing a system like this, even in theory, and it's going to be even harder when we're designing one in practice, any time you design a system of government, you always have to deal with the question of how do you stop the system from becoming corrupt?
Now, the answer is that any system is only as good as the people who comprise it.
The best way to ensure...
That the government of the Northwest American Republic never becomes corrupt and they never start doing stupid things like letting in nigger guest workers from Somalia or any ridiculous crap like that.
The best way to make sure that we stay on target and we stay on the straight and narrow is to make sure that we have an educated and motivated and vested citizen base.
In other words, the citizen base has some kind of stake in society.
From having enjoyed a life of prosperity, a stable life, a life with wife, family, kids, the whole nine yards, happiness and contentment, if you will.
These are the rewards that a stable society, that any state needs to be giving its own solution.
I said on one of my podcasts a while back, I asked if anybody's noticed that everyone is always so angry today.
Everyone's always upset.
Everyone's miserable.
They're all yelling and screaming at each other.
And then we wonder why we get the mess we got today.
You know, I know you said that the Constitution as written back in '06 was basically a draft, but as a woman and as a traditional white I would suggest that we ban this feminism crap.
Because to me, like, not only does it seriously injure men, but it also seriously injures women.
I look around and I see so many women my age, I cannot be friends with them because their entire life revolves around when they get to, and I quote, take a break from being a mom while their former baby daddy, whatever, has got their kids, all three of them.
And their whole life revolves around going out to the bars, getting drunk.
And shacking up with this guy, and then this guy, and then this guy, because feminism, woo!
And I'm just like, it's a horrible life.
It has destroyed society.
I mean, let's just ban that crap.
How about it?
Well, that's interesting.
One of my ideas for keeping our laws very slim and trim is something similar to what they called in Ireland Section 30, or Article 30. Basically, it was, you can be arrested.
I can't do this, you can't do that, you need to do this, and you need to do that in triplicate, and you need to do this with purple shoes on.
Just have like one law regarding quote-unquote antisocial behavior.
If someone is doing something which is prejudicial to good order or which has certain negative effects, they can be called to account under that law.
And so a lot of people, of course, think that's constitutionally repugnant, etc.
But anyway, getting back to what you're saying about feminism, I think feminism, frankly, Emily, is one of the problems that will disappear once a sane and normal society.
Yes.
is restored.
You've got to bear in mind, most of these horrible problems that we have today are caused by the presence in our society of niggers and Jews and homos and the entire apparatus of the United States government and so forth and so on.
And once all these things are gone, I think white men and women will quietly revert to an older and more natural pattern.
So I don't think we're going to have a lot of the problems with feminism that you might think.
Now, I am not one of these people who believes that women need to be kept barefoot pregnant and then chained to the stove or anything like that.
Even a white woman can rob them of everything they've ever worked for.
Take their kids, their house, everything, on a whim.
In the Republic, there will be no child protective services or any bureaucracy that can come and take your children, nothing like we've got today.
That is an abomination.
I think if, I mean, let's face it, there are going to be white families who have problems with child abuse, but those problems were handled in the past basically by the community.
It was considered back even as recently as 100 years ago, if you were a man and you were a drunk and you drank up the rent money and you gambled and you went out and chased women and you left your family to starve and beg on the street and all this stuff and just generally comported yourself, It was disgraceful.
And the whole community would get together in various ways and would give this guy a come-to-Jesus meeting and tell him to clean up his act.
It wasn't a totally effective system, but social distancing, disapproval and social pressure can do wonders to amend people's fears.
Change is a strong motivator.
Yeah, exactly.
Harold said earlier, and I'll emphasize it, feminism is entirely a homosexual Jewish creation.
Virtually every leader of the National Organization of Women was a lesbian and the Jewish connection is so strong in various homosexual organizations and in particular that the entire feminist agenda was promoted by the Jews.
The Jewish lawyers pushed through things in the courts, the family courts as opposed to normal courts.
I mean whatever protection you had in a normal court was abolished in the family courts and so by avoiding The Jews and the homosexuals and the corrupted court system that they created.
I think I agree with Harold that this problem basically goes away.
And you mentioned these women that you know that dump their kids off with their baby daddies and then they go hitting the honky-tonks and catting around and that sort of stuff.
I remember a time not so long ago that when a woman behaved like that it was considered shameful.
And mothers raised their daughters not to do things that quote-unquote compromised their reputation because once you got a reputation for being quote-unquote easy, you could never recover and that sort of stuff.
And there was a shame on the family, too.
Yeah, exactly.
The strong family.
And, you know, all of these things, these social mechanisms, in the past, worked.
To create a stable and effective society.
Okay, they weren't always perfect.
Nothing is.
But, my God, you know, compared to what we have today, when everybody's just literally spinning off into outer space doing their weird thing, even with all the other racial problems aside, just the sheer indiscipline and chaos of the lives of white people is wrecking society.
The old ways worked.
The old ways were the old ways for so many hundreds and thousands of years because they worked.
I've said almost the exact same thing myself.
I don't know how many times.
Yeah, I've actually been in a university lecture where a Jewish feminist has given a lecture at the university and I can't really remember what she's talking about.
For some reason she included Jerusalem.
And at the end she was asking the audience questions and the audience was overwhelmed with female, white and of childbearing age.
And she was saying that family needs...
To nationalism and fascism.
In a sense, it does.
In a sense, she knows what she's talking about, yeah.
I said, what's wrong with nationalism and fascism?
Whereupon you were stoned out of the room, probably.
She didn't answer my question.
She just turned to the audience to try and get them to laugh at me.
As if it was a joke.
And I said something about the Black Book of Communism, proving that communism was actually worth it.
But then I changed the subject and I asked directly in front of everyone else, I asked if she defined Israel as a fascist state.
And she was very nervous and she tried to run around the bush, but she said in the I want to make a comment when you mentioned earlier about the Amish and them cutting off the power.
It should be noticed that...
A lot of the power in the Northwest comes from hydroelectric dams, and it would be a very, very difficult thing to cut off from us.
We have the Grand Coulee Dam up here as well, which is the largest concrete structure in the world.
So, thinking that we have a lot of our own ability to make our own power, along with all the agricultural stuff we have.
We could.
I would always be afraid that the Americans would blow up the dams and whatnot as they withdrew.
That's responsible.
That's a bridge we're going to have to cross when we come to it.
You can do exactly the same thing to them if you're aware of exactly how fragile and vulnerable the electrical power grid is in the United States.
I will say one thing I have seen in many of the places I've been researching on moving to in the Northwest Republic, that I've noticed that there is a pretty hefty-sized population of preppers in the vicinity, many of them living in totally off-grid properties.
And that may be something that needs to be considered for those that are considering migrating.
We personally are looking into solar options.
Oh yeah, that's very good.
I will also add that if you look at what's happening across the United States as a whole, there is definitely a move by government, if I can use that term, to make off-grid living illegal.
Well, I bitch and moan all the time on RFN about how...
It's happening too slow, and we're talking a few people into coming home, but it's way, way too slow, slow as molasses in wintertime.
Come on, people, pull your socks up, get on with it.
But the fact is that there is massive migration, white migration, into the Northwest by people who either they've never heard of us, or they've never contacted the party, or they're hooked into some other right-wing or conservative or religious network, and they could get their information even from people like Alex Jones.
There is a movement called the Great Northwest Redoubt, which is, as has been pointed out to me, it's kosher conservative, and it invites Jews and all this sort of thing, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
But there's other movements as well, and the whole idea of the Great Northwest Redoubt here in the Pacific Northwest is not exclusive to the Northwest Front.
So people are coming here.
Mostly, they are substantial people.
They've got skills.
When they come here, they've got enough money to buy property.
As you say, a lot of them are preppers, a lot of them are survivalists, and a lot of them are just, frankly, just what you might call personal needs migrants because the word is getting out that the Pacific Northwest is one of the nicest places left in the country to live.
Emily, you live down there, you know, where you live.
I don't know if you want me to tell a place, but...
Mississippi Delta.
Yeah, right, the Mississippi Delta.
You might as well be living in Africa.
Very much.
I have to...
Stay armed 24 /7.
Thankfully, my state, earlier in this year, they legalized concealed carry without a permit, which is really good because, as I'm sure you see on the news, the blacks down here are just cutting up sideways.
They have lost their freaking minds.
And I mean, even in my area specifically, there are gangs now that are coming down the interstate from Memphis, pulling these home invasions, armed home invasions, whether you're home or not.
And they're in and out in just a few minutes.
They steal everything of value and any firearms or money.
And they jump right back on the interstate.
And they're halfway to Memphis before the sheriff even gets to your house.
And so after they legalized the concealed carry, my husband and I, we both, we went out and got appropriate legal firearms and appropriate holsters and belts and everything.
You know, everything's like you're supposed to do it.
And we watch ourselves and we make sure we don't have any traffic infractions.
But I can't go to my grocery store without a gun.
Mm-hmm.
Wow.
I can't.
Because the same grocery store a few months back, some black guy came in the parking lot, and he walks up to a window of a vehicle sitting in the parking lot, and there's an elderly disabled white woman.
He punched her straight in the face, and then he walked to the entrance and nearly knocked out an elderly white man.
And when apprehended by the police, his only statement was, even beauties can get their ass kicked.
That's where I live.
Well, you need to be living here.
Oh, we're working on it.
In England, we're not actually allowed, not only are we not allowed firearms, we're not allowed pepper spray.
I mean, they have castrated everyone over there.
That's what they want to do to you.
If there was no Second Amendment, that's what it would be like in America.
Yeah.
I think without the Second Amendment, we would be living in Orwell's 1984 right now.
I think one of the few things that has restrained the present dictatorship from just going completely batshit and turning us into a mindless ant hive is the fact that there are 300 million privately held guns in this country.
Even though we're not using them, I think their mere presence gives these people.
It's not even the Second Amendment that you benefit from.
It's also the First Amendment.
I mean, in this country, there are people...
I mean, Joshua Bonehill is one individual I can name.
He's been sentenced to almost four years for posting anti-Jewish cartoons.
Harold, you know, one thing you said one time about the police forces and when the money runs out, you know, they're only working for a paycheck.
I think that's, I think, when we can, if they get turned around and start defending people instead of the government, boy, I tell you, I think when you talk about the balloon going up, I think that's what's going to do it.
Because I think a lot of, like the woman said, you know, if you've got to carry a gun to go to the supermarket, you're going to reach a breaking point after a while, and I think once you're not afraid of the police coming after you, I think we're going to see some real problems, and I think things are going to start to happen where we can turn things around.
Well, this is Greg, and I'd just suggest that it's a very good subject, but it's a little bit far-ranging.
I think if you break it down into parts on an ongoing basis until all the pertinent material is covered, you'd get more precise inquiries and comments.
Frankly, because I'm a geezer now, you young blades out there a little sharper, but it is new and different, and it seems to be a little too broad and all-encompassing.
One session.
I suggested that we were going to talk about the Trump thing, but I think the reaction I got from most of the people that emailed back was that everybody's pretty much Trumped out now.
And we did pretty good this time around.
We only went off on Trump once, I think.
I want to make a comment on the organic migrants, is that people I talk to, and especially there are a lot of people up here who are from outside the Northwest Republic, and through the various dog whistles that you catch in their conversation, is that they would probably never admit it, but they're up here for its implicit whiteness.
I even get that from non-whites who are living up here, is that they are That's the kind of...
I vacation up in Maine, and Maine is the whitest state of the Union.
You talk to Mainers, and that is precisely the subtext.
That people let you know, well, we're Mainers, and it's the oldest population and the whitest population.
And by God, I've been going up there for nine years, and in those nine years, I've only seen three black folks.
That's town state.
You go mid-Main and up north, that's only one section.
That's 1,200.
And that was our little Jewish buddies imported them.
But for nine years I've been up there, I've seen three blacks.
It's incredible.
Anyhow, good program.
I'm signing off.
You take care, guys.
Bye-bye.
I had one question that I'd like to ask.
As you know, a lot of the more advanced technical jobs and professions have been essentially taken over by H-1B immigrants, where they were educated overseas and they came over.
How would our future state deal with the problem of presumably a mass exodus of non-whites, but also whites that have valuable skills and traits that are necessary to maintain?
Like we were talking about the power grid and maintain all that stuff.
How would we deal with that?
Okay.
I'm sorry to fall back on my own novels, but in the first chapter of Freedom Sons, I'm sorry, second, I guess it'll be the second chapter, you know, where Ridgway, the finance minister, goes up and he goes into the treasury building, starts his first day of work, and he's watching a TV, and it's showing the south-bound lanes of Interstate 5, And all of these white people are fleeing from the horrible, wicked, fascist, racist, Nazi Northwest Republic.
And he says something, that's stupid.
But the guard behind the counter says, yes, sir, but look at the northbound lanes.
And they're just as completely swamped.
I believe that for all of the whites who run away and take their skills and their assets with them, there will be more than enough coming into the country to make up for it.
I believe that once we can establish a clearly delineated white ethnostate here and say, hey guys, come on in, the water's fine, the gates are open, we need you here, we will have more skilled people.
people that we can shake a stick at.
Because...
The question is, what will the old America do when all the skilled whites leave?
That's a good point.
Yeah, well, the old America's going to collapse in any case.
They're trying to get rid of the skilled whites right now with all these macacas and foreigners, For some reason, they decided they don't need us anymore, which is bizarre, but I think you're going to find out different.
Yeah.
Well, I would add that I'm a retired engineer, and I'm familiar with the H-1B visa issue, and it was a fraud from the beginning.
There was no shortage of white American men, engineers, and computer programmers and such to do these jobs.
But what they've been trying to do, as Harold hinted around at, in my experience, I've seen it, and that is...
In aerospace engineering, where I came from, there were two major groups of engineers.
Number one were white males, and number two were Asian males.
And everything else is just a little sprinkling.
So, they're trying to replace white males with Asian males, but I will also add that every creative engineer I ever met was a white male.
Interesting.
I tell the blacks sometimes, on the rare occasions when I interact with them, which hasn't been for many years, anyway, I'll tell them, they'll say, "Look, you see all those Mexicans?
They're being brought in to replace you.
See all those Asians there?
They're being brought in to replace us, the white people." That's true.
simplified way of looking at it, but I think it's close to the mark.
I heard the same thing from a black co-worker.
He said, man, these Mexicans are the new niggers.
Yeah.
Well, I think the This is one reason that Trump might get more black votes than people think, because they are not, as a group, totally stupid.
They are capable of seeing what's right in front of their face, and they know darn well who is taking their jobs, who is pushing them out of their former neighborhoods.
And the fact is that your average, you know, street nigger probably interacts more in a negative way with the local beaners and the Mexicans or other third-world immigrants, Muslims or whatever.
You know, I think it's important to note that whites aren't the only ones that are now pushing for their own ethnostates.
I personally subscribe to a belief that the U.S. will eventually balkanize into several different ethnostates.
Louis Farrakhan wants to create a black nation in the South.
Oh, we're aware of it in the South.
Of course, all the rednecks down here are, you know, they beat their chests and, you know, they want to raise their rebel flags and talk about how, you know, that'll never happen here.
There's too many white rednecks with guns, but they're too stupid to look around and realize they are already outnumbered.
The South is dead and it will never rise again.
I know.
That's, I think, you know, in that respect, and I made this decision long ago, but leaving...
Carolina was one of the hardest things I ever did, but I knew that I had to do it because it had become clear to me that it just simply was not possible to revive a corpse, and we have to look ahead to the future, to some kind of new country that is for everybody, not just Southerners, but a homeland for all the white peoples of the earth, the world over.
Anyway, is there anything else real quick?
▲
Export Selection