All Episodes
Previous Next
June 16, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:07:53
20160616_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush-a-woogle, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token whistle of the marching tune.
Warrior bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your eyes upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud wall cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a man's chest was throbbing for the blessed warning light.
The waters passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon, at the rising of the moon.
And a thousand days were fleshing out, rising all the moon.
It's June the 16th, 2016.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Okay, first up, I obviously need to make a few remarks about the Orlando Faggot Massacre, which took place on Saturday the 11th or the morning of June the 12th, whichever you prefer.
When the ISIS thing came out, I wondered how the left loons and the Democrats were going to spin the narrative.
In order to turn it away from the obvious Muslim and ISIS and immigration connection.
And try to wrench it back on to guns, guns, guns, it's all the fault of the guns.
Gotta take all white people's guns away.
And it looks like they may manage it, or at least they're sure trying.
En passant, I am always fascinated by what this liberal democratic system does when the various little minorities and special interest groups in the society can't play nice together.
Or when something happens that clearly contradicts the party line, excuse the expression, but they can't immediately blame it all on Republicans and white males and Donald Trump.
I'm always interested in which minority, in the end, has more juice with the media and with the powers that be, and so far, homosexuals have had a lot of juice.
For example, when nigger comedians of both genders get cyber-lynched and defunctionalized for making faggot jokes on stage, that kind of thing.
So far, at least, faggots have always come up trumps in the victim stakes, but not anymore now that the Hilda Beast's narrative is being threatened.
What the dictatorship is apparently doing, after some initial confusion in order to airbrush Islam and immigration out of the picture in Orlando, is to claim that this guy Omar Mateen, who did the shooting, was a faggot himself, and he was self-hating, and so he decided to go all disco duck on his fellow bugger boys.
I'm not sure I buy this, although there is apparently a tradition of boy-buggering in Islamic countries, and especially Afghanistan, because women are kept in such seclusion.
Ever heard of the famous Dancing Boys of Kandahar?
But it's kept very much on the down-low over there, and only somebody very high up in Islamic society, a warlord or something, can get away with it.
Something never ever mentioned in public.
In most Islamic countries, ordinary faggots get strung up or get bits and pieces cut off their anatomy.
This is not an optimal spin for the liberals because it leaves a brown hand on the trigger and it also throws a major democratic constituency under the bus, i.e.
homos.
But you have to understand that there is no Islamic terrorism in Obama's America.
That's their story and they're sticking to it.
It simply doesn't exist.
Mighty Barry and his Secretary of State, the equally mighty sea hag, killed Osama bin Laden in 2011.
Or, anyway, they kill some old guy that the Navy SEALs found in a house somewhere in Pakistan watching cartoons and dumped his body in the ocean rather than bringing it back here to the United States for definite DNA analysis.
So we'll never know if Osama bin Laden is dead or even if he ever existed at all.
But the main thing you have to bear in mind, I repeat, is that there is no Islamic terrorism in the United States under Obama, and preserving that narrative is vital to the Hildebeest's election as president, even to the point of throwing the faggots under the bus.
Now, my guess is that this one is going to disappear into the news cycle fairly quickly.
It's going to be a little bit harder than usual, since the dead in this case belong to a highly politically protected Democrat constituency.
But there are simply too many inconsistencies in the narrative.
Right.
Latest update on the horse race.
On the Republican side, the RINOs are still looking for some way to screw Trump out of the nomination at the convention in Cleveland.
But so far, they don't seem to be having much luck.
They're muttering about changing the rules at the convention to allow pledged delegates to quote-unquote vote their conscience.
And then once the delegates are theoretically free on the first ballot, they start bribing, bribing, bribing, right, left, and center.
The questions which then arise are A. How are they going to do this without destroying their own party's base, pretty much all of whom seem to want Trump like they voted for, and who wouldn't appreciate their millions of votes being ignored?
And B. Who the hell do they nominate for president in place of Trump and his millions of votes?
What major rhino is sufficiently suicidal to take on this task?
Will they airlift in Mitt Romney again?
Yeah, like that worked so well last time.
Unless they can persuade some Republican governor or congressman no one's ever heard about to take the nomination, I'm not sure that they'll be even able to get that plan off the ground at all.
Also, of course, if they do steal Trump's nomination and they run some empty suit, they're effectively handing the presidency right to the Hildebeest, who is a criminal, a pathological liar, and pretty obviously not in her right mind.
And I'm not sure all of the Republicans would be willing to do that, no matter how much they hate Donald Trump.
If they steal his nomination, Trump will run as a third-party candidate or independent, and that's the Republican Party going right down the bowl.
Millions of white people will never trust the GOP again, and they will lose their base completely.
Screw Trump and they're gone, and I think some of them have enough sense to realize it.
Now, over on the Democrat side, that damned old Jewish hippie still won't give up and bow down to mommy dearest and acknowledge her greatness as the first female whatever the hell she's supposed to be.
Even though the Beast is technically the nominee now, it looks like the Bernie Bros are planning to stage a fracos at the Democratic Convention in Philadelphia next month, and picketing and protesting against the Hilda Beast and her Jewish hag factotum Debbie Blabbermouth Schultz, who has helped Hillary rig the entire democratic process from beginning to end.
It's possible that the 2016 Democratic Convention may turn into a repetition of Chicago in 1968.
Which I know most of you people don't remember, but the situation is actually similar.
In 1968, the big issue was the war in Vietnam, of course, and the Democrats had a sort of hippy-dippy peace candidate named Eugene McCarthy, while the establishment candidate, who stood for more of the same as LBJ, was a non-entity named Hubert Humphrey.
The young, clean, virgin hippies ended up getting chased through the streets and tear-gassed and whooped up on by Democratic Mayor Daley's cops for being stroppy and insolent to their elders, and insisting that their candidate be given a fair shake.
In 2016, the C-HAG is the establishment candidate, and the so-called progressive and ultra-left candidate is an old Jew from Brooklyn who was probably one of the same hippies who was running around the streets of Chicago getting whooped up on back in 1968, so he hasn't really changed much.
The Democratic Convention is additionally complicated by the fact that Mommy Dearest is technically still under an FBI investigation for espionage and treason regarding her email usage when she was Secretary of State.
Although, if any charges are ever brought against her, that won't be how they're worded.
But they won't be brought, though.
Obama pretty much signaled that when he endorsed Hillary last week.
I suspect that the FBI has been given top-secret orders to sit on the whole mess until after the election, which is what they were pretty clearly doing anyway.
I mean, come on now.
This investigation is 15 months on and they still haven't even interviewed the prime suspect yet.
They can send over 100 men to Argon to murder Lavoie Finnegan in public, but they can't spare two agents to talk to the prime suspect in an espionage and treason case?
Yeah, right.
Okay, earlier this week I sent out a link to a video by a guy named Stephen Molyneux, who's a kind of neoconservative libertarian who seems to have a lot on the ball.
I didn't know much about him at the same time, and I got the usual emails swearing the guy was a Jew, which I disregarded at first, because in our wee little slice of life, everybody always calls everybody else a Jew, or a queer, or an FBI informer at one time or another.
It kind of goes with the territory.
But I kept getting these emails screaming, Molino's a Jew, Molino's a Jew, and sure enough, one of our guys in the UK finally provided some proof, i.e.
Molino himself on tape admitting to it.
So I had to issue a retraction, and the retraction in turn got some comment, including one guy who wrote in asking that, since Molino is so sharp on some things, can't we issue him a temporary pass?
I circulated that and my own opinion on temporary passes.
Including those that I myself periodically give on a very limited basis, indeed, to my own court Jew, James Howard Kunstler.
Andy Donner chipped in and he recommended that we review his Race in Politics series, Part 4. So this was originally podcast on Radio Free Northwest on May the 1st, 2014.
Greetings from Seattle, comrades.
This is Andy Donner.
Today I'm going to cover Real Politics 4, which is an overview of the subject of race.
Quite a few of you might not get a whole lot out of this, since a long-time white racist isn't going to be too surprised at what I've got to say.
But it needs to be said.
Quite a few different elements in the alternative political scene won't clearly state what they mean when they talk about the problems they want to address.
Before I get that far in the Real Politics series, I need to justify where I'm taking the discussion and make sure everyone is ready to go there.
Further, all this is fair game for spaced repetition.
Race as an abstract subject doesn't come up on this program very much, even if we regularly discuss consequences and tangible realities of race.
It's also the case we have folks wandering to and from on the internet who aren't exactly sure what white nationalism actually is.
For the record, yes, we do mean race.
We're racists.
We aren't especially fond of people who aren't white, and we think you should hold the same position.
The immediate question is why.
Why would we hold this position?
Attempting to explain this in detail would take quite literally a lifetime.
Good thing it's not necessary.
There are very few high points I need to cover in my general discussion before I move on to a specific issue which tends to elude new and less well-read white nationalists.
The first is that behavior, despite all the liberal, progressive, whiny opposition to reality, is genetic in nature.
Every single one of us has exhibited odd little incidents within our families where someone mimics some odd mannerism of a relative we've never seen express that mannerism.
We don't even know we're doing it until a parent, aunt, or uncle points it out.
Further, quite a few studies exist where twins, triplets, and other children of multi-child births are separated and later reunited.
This even turned into a daytime television trend for a while.
The similarity in life choices, including the ages at which crimes were committed, And even the similarity in the particular crimes is all quite stunning to someone not expecting it.
But so what?
Well, as I said, criminality is involved.
Criminality, for my purposes today, is defined as behavior contrary to civilization, which is another concept I'll touch on briefly.
It's well understood by just about every white person, even lefty assholes, that whites living near niggers don't like niggers.
Whites living around mestizos don't like them either.
There are a number of Arab hotbeds in traditionally white countries, and they are real hellholes.
In fact, there are various sorts of Asians all over the place, and their little communities in large cities are also disasters.
What seems to elude us is putting all these things together into a big picture.
For some odd reason, the conclusion that white people define what is proper, acceptable, and good is only discussed among very close friends and family behind closed doors.
I've had non-racist family members find out my politics and claim they don't agree with me as a prelude for expressing the beliefs I've just named.
It's that whole I'm-not-racist-but thing which liberals make fun of normal white people for.
Just about every white person has these opinions in one form or another that they won't express until they believe they're in a place safe to do so.
Even in that context, some of us have an awful time trying to verbalize what we're thinking.
Mr. Covington periodically reminds us of the reason behind his attachment to the novel 1984, and with good reason.
This is a perfect example of controlling thought by controlling vocabulary.
White people have trouble expressing their opinions because they don't quite know how to do so.
It should be completely obvious to all but the most whacked-out, self-hating whites.
Race is genetic.
If race and behavior are caused by the same thing, This is the definitive scientific work on the subject, and I couldn't recommend it more.
Following that, material concerning the social impact and problems racially mixed societies deal with can be found in two books by Carlton Putnam, Race and Reason, and the follow-up, Race and Reality.
The two Putnam titles have very excellent point-counterpoint material to handle objections to pro-white racism.
When you get done with all that, it's best to proceed to understanding what sorts of consequences for civilization race entails.
For that, I recommend Lothrop Stoddard's The Revolt Against Civilization, The Menace of the Underman.
Stoddard does a great job of documenting the strain on a society which is plagued by the problems racial heterogeneity invariably causes.
From there, proceed on to a textbook by Arthur Kemp, titled March of the Titans.
Kemp's history of the white race very carefully and thoroughly demonstrates, through verifiable evidence, should any of you still be interested in arguing, that the world's great civilizations were the product of higher-quality white peoples.
and were only destroyed when they allowed themselves to come into regular contact with and be overrun by non-white peoples.
The takeaway here is that the world we all know and love will very easily disappear should white people not retain their own territory and defensive capabilities to ensure they may raise future generations free from the problems modern white men and women are all too familiar with.
But am I going too far with this?
Could there possibly be some good non-whites?
Well, it's actually not relevant.
It's just like the reality that there will always be some unsavory whites running around.
Those few degenerates in the white race don't keep society from operating.
On the flip side, even if there are good non-whites, they clearly don't have any effect on the fact that their racial brethren are incredibly dangerous to be around.
Should these mythical beings exist, they have no bearing on anything whatsoever.
But really, am I taking this too far?
Can non-white hordes really overwhelm our societies to the point where they break?
Well, yes, demonstrably so, considering I can quote history textbooks to prove my point.
But the real trouble is that it's happening again.
Most normal white people come further and further right, to the point of being near racists, when they take stock of the ills currently plaguing us.
The magazine Mother Jones recently ran an online article explaining why politics might be hardwired into people's brains based on genetics.
That give them a behavioral predisposition to one thing over another.
But do politics really fall along racial lines?
As it turns out, they do.
After the 2010 midterm elections, a shifty diversity education contractor for the federal government named Tim Wise wrote an open letter to white people.
He claims it is only to the white right, but as I'm about to demonstrate, he really did mean all white people.
The letter was quite long, so I'm going to cite the portions relevant to my point.
Quote, Your time is limited.
Real damned limited.
And you will lose.
This isn't hubris.
It isn't ideology.
It is not wishful thinking.
It is math.
In 40 years or so, there won't be any more white folks around who think the 1950s were the good old days, because we'll be able to teach about them accurately and honestly.
In about 40 years, half the country will be black or brown, and there is nothing you can do about it.
Like I said, this is math, and numbers don't lie.
End quote.
That wasn't too pleasant, was it?
As I said, I cut quite a lot of the letter, but I didn't alter its meaning one bit.
It's on the man's website, and anyone can verify what I pulled from it with very little effort.
Incidentally, anyone who wants to can verify any of the things I've said today with very little effort.
Anyhow, Mr. Wise claims he's speaking to right-wing white people only.
But is that really the case?
If ideology were the issue here and not race, then why would half the country being non-white be a problem for the right?
And further, what is Mr. Wise under the impression current and future generations will be taught?
I've gone through enough material to make it very simple for anyone to learn the truth about race in history.
Race is real, and it matters.
Tim Wise knows this.
Everyone who isn't a complete buffoon knows this.
Most importantly, Weiss's remarks in his letter show he knows ideology, as reported on by the aforementioned Mother Jones piece, is just as genetic and therefore racial as anything else.
When he says white-right, he really means white.
Non-whites universally lean left, and normal white people, even those in larger cities, contrary to popular opinion, Tend toward the right, though they would rather not admit it.
Further, Wise very carefully calculated his words and he understands that white people are going away as a whole, not just particular ideas, though they're almost the same thing.
We are being overwhelmed just as our ancient civilizations were ages ago.
But why is Tim Wise, who claims to be white, so excited about this?
Well, you'll note I used the word claims.
He's anything but white.
And with that, I've arrived at the more delicate of my points I mentioned when I started introducing my subject.
There are some more important nuances to the subject of race which sometimes confuse new white nationalists.
I understand some longer-term white nationalists, who are otherwise squared away, aren't up to snuff on this next point.
Before we begin, I'm going on the record as saying that I personally consider this a severe failure on their part.
If you will recall the stages of learning concept I introduced some weeks back, a long-time white nationalist should have reached the level of unconscious competence on the material I'm talking about today.
But quite a few haven't, despite the amount of time and effort they've put into the subject.
It's no one's fault but theirs, either.
So, if Tim Wise isn't white, then what is he?
Let's consider that his name could also be pronounced Weiss.
What sort of name is that?
It's Jewish.
Tim Wise is a kike.
As an aside for just a second, Jews are quite good at changing their names to hide, and there are plenty of historic periods where they've done so.
Kikes aren't white, and this, provided someone understands race as well as they should, is almost trivial to demonstrate, which I will do now.
As has been pointed out, behavior is associated with race, not religion.
Jews are notorious for behaving the same way throughout all of history, which has resulted in their being kicked out of all manner of countries hundreds of times, especially by whites.
Religions change over time, even if many would like to pretend they don't.
In some cases, such as Spain, conversion to Christianity was an option which permitted remaining in the country, but that didn't make Jews any less kikish than they were before.
Racial behavior is an invariant over time.
One cannot tell a Buddhist, Catholic, Protestant, Atheist, or Pagan from one another by lining them up.
One can, with a certain amount of knowledge and a little bit of intuition, tell a Jew by their appearance.
I'm told that New Yorkers can spot a heave from a mile away due to the amount of exposure they have to New York kikes.
In fact, I had the severe displeasure of knowing a couple of Messianic Jews some years ago, and they were just as obnoxious and horrible to be around as any other Jew.
They were literally the stereotype of a sheenie and were just as anti-white as their racial brother Tim Wise.
Religion doesn't constitute Judaism.
Race does.
Religious Jews and atheist Jews think of each other as totally Jewish.
This couldn't be the case if Judaism weren't a race.
Since I've referenced materials which contain hard racial science, I'll point out that nearly all of world Jewry, even the whitish-looking ones, have blood protein which tests in the Asiatic variety.
This proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that a Jew cannot be white any more than a nigger, spick, or other shit-colored hominid.
The Northwest Front recognizes this in its draft constitution.
Section 1 establishes the standard of nationhood and citizenship in the proposed Northwest American Republic.
Article 5 reads, The race commonly known as Jews are in culture and historic tradition an Asiatic people and shall not be considered white or accorded white racial status under law.
No Jew shall be allowed to enter or reside in the Northwest American Republic under any circumstances.
End quote.
This is the sum of the party's commentary on the matter, and anyone not in compliance with this position cannot be said to be of the same mind as the Northwest Front.
Having said that, there's a matter I must address.
On Radio Free Northwest, and on his personal weblog, Mr. Covington has repeatedly quoted the late Pastor Bob Miles on the subject of Judaism and Jewish ancestry.
On the surface, Pastor Miles appears to completely contradict every sane white nationalist's understanding of the Jewish question.
What he said, specifically, is that Judaism is a state of mind and that, quote, Jews aren't a race.
Some of the worst Jews you will ever meet won't have a drop of Hebrew blood in their veins.
Obviously, that's not literally true.
My understanding is that Pastor Miles subscribed to Christian identity and could not in any way believe that to be literally accurate.
I figured I better cover this to prevent a litany of questions from people who remember official party sources as having repeated the remark Miles made many years ago.
Truth be told, Pastor Miles was definitely on to something, but it's complex.
Whenever someone says something which cannot be literally true, it's best to try to imagine what they're actually getting at before writing them off.
Mr. Covington captured this best on his personal thought crime blog when he expounded on Miles.
Judaism, or at least the Judaism in view, is the rejection of man as a spiritual being and the reduction of life to purely material terms.
Both communism and capitalism, being economic expressions of what happens when racial Jews run society, are totally materialistic.
A better way of thinking of the concept is to realize Pastor Miles was talking about what happens when an otherwise decent white person becomes the Jewish equivalent of a wigger.
A white kike.
A wike, perhaps?
Regardless of the terms we use, the phenomenon should never be used to invalidate the fact that Jews, whatever else they may be, are a race.
I've gone way too long today, but it needed to be done.
Using race as a gauge allows us to talk about not only the problem of white genocide, but also to examine various ideologies and possible solutions in terms of their impact on race, and therefore, on white genocide.
Hail victory, comrades!
This is the late, great Stan Rogers.
The Late, great Stan Rogers.
The Kirkston Pass The Winding Ward Lane
Rest ye me, good grey hawk.
And me, my steed, may grace thy fill from us this mountain walk.
But come when you hear my horn.
And answer swift a call.
For I fear the sun will rise this morn.
You will serve me best of all.
And it's down to the water.
He's borne the rowing shield And the golden rod he has passed in To see what the lake might yield And when rose she from the rain And passed a fleet when she One half the form of a maiden fair With a jet and mare's body And loud long it shall be blue Till a state was by his side I overhead the
greyhawk blue That swiftly he lied Saying, horse, well, even don't know Catch me the jet black bear Stupid striking a greyhawk And bring me the maiden fair Woo!
She said, pray she by silvery sword, lay down thy rowing shield.
For I see by the briny blood that flows, you've been wounded in the field.
And she's stood in and down with her velvet blue, bound round with her silver chain.
And she's kissed his veil as once and twice, and three times round again.
She's bound his wound with the golden crumple, fast in her arms he lay.
And he has risen, hail, and soon at the sun high in the day.
She said, ride with your brindled hounds and heel.
And your good grey hawk in hand, there's dunk and harp.
But read who's named at the witch of the West Maryland.
guitar solo
applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause applause
applause applause applause Bye.
Tonight I'm going to be discussing the Dharma Manifesto by Sri Dharma Harvataka Archera.
Now, this is a much more mainstream aspect of the Aradharma book.
The Manifesto is tailored to American audience, and Archera G...
Chief concerns are meta-psychological and meta-political.
Our charity says we want certainty, but we often feel doubt, and that the good society reconciles the spiritual and the material plane.
A people constitutes a political entity, and they have a common heritage and are, to a certain respect, tied to the land and shaped by it.
The state functions to their benefit, and the ideal leader should be a philosopher, a king, and the Sanskrit term being Chakra Vardhan.
Now, these really don't come that often, and he really doesn't quite tell us what one is to do during the in-between times.
Now, Archeragy sees three types of political movements.
He spends a great deal of time discussing Marxism, which represents a utopian worldview.
He claims that it's out of tune with human nature.
Arturo G also has a critique of reactionary views, such as the Tea Party.
Now, unlike Marxists who are over-dependent on theories, Reactionaries try to combat decadence that they see around them, and often hearkening back to an era in living memory which is assumed to be perfect, and then essentially praying to turn back the clock.
Now, only revolutionaries are viewed as worthwhile, and these individuals will tend to gravitate towards such movements as a macrofuturism.
When Archerichi talks about revolution, he's talking about nonviolence, but he's talking about how a planet, for example, goes through a cycle, and it will make a revolution, in a sense.
It will go through the various yugas, for example, and it will come back to where it was.
That's what he means by revolution, rather than a violent overthrow.
Now, Archeraji critiques the Kintuva movement, which is erring in one of two ways.
It is either westernized and watered down, or on the other side, it becomes overly provincial.
Archeraji is very much keen in this book to appeal to American audience.
To this end, he somewhat implies that Savitri Devai was merely a provincial Indian-like Sivarka.
However, a careful reading of the appendix indicates that she was more important to Dharmic Renewal than Archeragy wants to imply to the casual reader.
Now, the author also seems to throw both Darwin and Nietzsche under the bus with a little discussion.
But he tends to condemn both as they are both known for atheism.
As far as that goes, my opinion in terms of Darwinism, well, for one thing, there's more to religion than the book of Genesis, for example.
There's certainly more to Christianity, but then there's also more to religion on the whole, and of course there are other religions other than Christianity.
So Darwinism really, in some sense, has nothing to do with atheism.
It has to do with science.
But, you know, moreover, when you look at the process, for example, of natural selection, that, I would think, is more of an insight into the mind of the divine.
Or the processes of the divine in terms of creation than you would have with any human system that is made up.
So that's my view of Darwin.
As far as Nietzsche, I don't quite know what to say there, and I'll leave that one alone because that's such a complex topic.
Proper government and societies are founded on natural law, and when Archeryji is talking about natural law, he's really talking about Dharma.
And these are shaped, according to Archeryji, by the morality granted by religion.
Now, of course, Dawkins is going to take great issue with this, but at any rate, he talks about this idea, Archeryji talks about the idea of freedom of religion.
And he says that it's not freedom from religion.
He also fears that a large and powerful state could potentially suppress Dharma.
Our charity really wants to eradicate the welfare state and also many governmental organizations.
And he really wants government to be very small, very decentralized, and he really wants to encourage citizens to start small businesses and establish family farms.
One organization that will feel itself or find itself very much sustained, even under a dharmic nationalist government, will be the INS, the Immigration and Naturalization Service.
Because there's going to be a lot of deportations.
There's going to be a redirection of soldiers from foreign bases, which are pretty much all going to be closed.
They're going to come back to the States.
And also, there's going to be a lot of citizen participation, such as neighborhood watch programs and also citizen fitness groups.
Our chair is very strict about voting.
He says that voting should not take place until after the age of 25. And if you come from another country and you want citizenship, you're going to have to wait 20 years.
Now, that's even more than Germany, because Germany is 10 years.
He also imagines that the U.S., as we know it, may not have a lot of time, but whatever is here on this continent is always going to be some of the primary nations that he speaks about.
And when he speaks of primary nations, he speaks of nations that can create value in rare elements of civilization.
He also talks about secondary nations.
These are nations that can only sustain but not create culture.
Now, Dharma is a concern of the primary and the secondary nations only, whereas birth control is a concern of secondary and tertiary nations.
And tertiary nations are nations that cannot either create or sustain culture.
As far as the Middle East is concerned, Machiraji wants to promote a Palestinian state, but he really wants a two-state solution.
He wants Jews to relocate to Israel.
Dharmic nationalism desires the increase of Zoroastrianism in Iran and wants to enhance the ties between the U.S. or whatever replaces it and Europe and India.
Now, Archeragy hopes that the artificial state of Pakistan will be dissolved in place of legitimate historical ethnic groups, because he talks about how Pakistan is a multi-ethnic state, and he does not believe in multi-ethnic states whatsoever.
Now, Archeragy also wants to eliminate any profit from interest, and he wants to create a 35-hour workweek.
He says that it's wrong to be defeatist and abandon politics completely.
Archera Gee wants voters to support alternative parties, and voters should vote their conscience and not their fear.
Now, as far as Archera G's organization, he writes of two types of membership in the Midwest Vedic Initiative.
General, which means giving money and moral support, and activist cadres, which entail living in the Omaha community and also submitting to stringent moral codes, and most importantly, obedience to Archera G. Now that's always a problem when one talks about a leader in that sense because who's going to replace that leader and etc.
That's always an issue.
At any rate, he also talks about activists.
Propaganda, which is important that activists do propagandize, and that they have to suit their propaganda to their audience, and they have to guard against overload.
Now, if they do end up using entryism, they have to be honest about who they are, but again, they don't want to overload people, and they want to adopt the least unethical weapons of their opponents.
Now, at the end of this text, our charity prays that an avatar will descend.
And that devotees will do the needful.
Back when Archerji was writing this book, he seems to be a supporter of Ron Paul.
But nowadays, many nationalist Hindus are praying for Trump.
And this is somewhat due to his blunt and aggressive stance with regard to Muslims.
But as I'm reading this book and I'm thinking more and more about the Trump phenomenon, I start to wonder if he could be some sort of an Avesha avatar.
The author, Amar Chiriji, of course, says that voters should look at a candidate in terms of the Bahava Gita and whether that candidate is embodying these Chakravartan qualities.
And that's fine, but how many candidates are really like that?
Now, as far as Trump being some kind of avatar, I'm really not sure.
I'll have to watch the campaign more closely and just contemplate that notion.
And also, Marcherji talks about how they have a patron deity of the struggle, in addition to, of course, Krishna, but they also have Vidar and the fact that he is silent and strategic.
I found this book very fascinating, and it seems that in this book, Archerji is really talking up small government and is perhaps trying to appeal in some way to a Tea Party crowd and move them in a dynamic direction.
So that's an interesting tactic of Archerji, and I also find what's going on with Trump very interesting.
I would say this is very unique, and I really believe that has not happened in the Hindu world really since Adolf Hitler.
So I'm finding that a fascinating development.
So I hope you enjoyed this report.
Thank you very much for listening, and hail victory, comrades.
Thank you.
Look, when Gretchen talks about Dharma and the Vedas and the Bhagavad Gita and that sort of stuff, I understand what she's talking about, but part of me is inevitably drawn in my memory back to the 1960s, when everybody had their own Swami or Guru.
I know that's ridiculous, but hey, what can I tell you?
Anyway, this is Kenny Rogers in his pre-country singer days.
*music*
Yeah, yeah, oh yeah, what condition my condition was in.
I woke up this morning with the sundown shining in.
I found my mind in a brown paper bag, but then I tripped on a cloud and fell eight miles high.
I tore my mind on a jagged sky I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in Yeah, yeah, oh yeah, what condition my condition was in I pushed my soul in a deep dark hole and then I followed it in I
watched myself crawling out as I was crawling in I got up so tight I couldn't unwind I saw so much I broke my mind I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in I
I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.
I said I just dropped in to see what condition my condition was in.
Yeah, yeah, oh yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
One theory I always had is, you know, you see a lot of these people on the left and they seem to get more zealot and they're getting more outlandish with the things they're trying to push through.
And I think that's going to cause a big backlash.
And I think that's part of the appeal that Trump has is because he doesn't back down.
He doesn't apologize for things he says.
And I kind of think...
Oh, go ahead.
No, you go ahead.
You know, I think the more the left pushes this ridiculous crap on us, the more people are going to push back against that.
Yeah, I could be wrong.
It could be that it won't be some big, huge, catastrophic event that causes the system to collapse.
It could be that it'll be just some little, tiny piece of nonsense that, even a few years ago, the system could have absorbed without difficulty.
I'll give you a typical example.
All this silliness about letting so-called transgenders go in the women's room.
Of course, in many cases, you're not talking about people who have actually had this.
Bizarre operation.
You're talking just about very sick-in-the-head men who dress up as women, and nobody wants that.
Nobody in their right minds wants that.
Up until, hell, about a year ago, I can't remember even the lefty loons on Salon and Huffington Post agitating for that.
That just came out of left field.
It's like somebody sat down and said, what is the most absurd piece of crap that we can possibly dream up to start jamming down the throats of the norms?
Now.
And that's what they came up with.
That is just...
Again, it's a kind of hubris.
It's a kind of arrogance of power.
We're going to make you do what we want.
We want you to have drag queens in women's bathrooms.
Something like that could basically touch off the final spark.
Or maybe some really spectacular...
I mean, the sort of thing, again, that has happened time and time and time and time again down through the past decades.
And white society simply absorbs it, and we do our mourning in private, and we bury our dead, and we let it go.
But I can see something happening that's especially horrible.
Maybe a child or children get killed in some really horrible way by niggers.
I just can see that this, for some reason, maybe because of Trump, maybe because of the freedom that Trump has now given the media to speak, maybe because of the Internet, for some reason, this one horrible crime just won't die.
And eventually it boils and it boils and it boils and something starts.
It's kind of like a billiard ball being knocked across the table and knocking all the other balls around.
It could be.
It could be something small, but...
In these lefty people, these Obama types, these social justice warriors, there is an incredible, condescending arrogance of power.
And it has filled normal white people with rage beyond belief.
Trump has released just some of it.
I don't think we've seen the half of what's going to happen as what we're going to see after these conventions in July, when it's a flat-out thing between Trump and Hillary.
Then a lot's going to come out in the wash.
It could be the election will set it off.
It could be that Trump will be murdered or that they'll pull some electoral trick to deprive Trump of his victory.
There's no telling what will happen.
So, again, I just say the system is totally corrupt and it is going to go down.
And I think now it's going to go down within the lifetimes of all of us who are living today.
Yeah, I actually believe that too.
And it seems like it keeps getting worse and worse and it seems like people are more polarized now than they've been.
I don't know.
If they've ever been, because I'm not really that old, but it seems people were more cooperative maybe 40, 50 years ago than they are today.
Oh, absolutely.
May I ask how old you are?
I'm 41. Oh, okay.
You sounded younger.
For those of you who are listening and who can't remember the 50s and the 60s and the 70s, if you ever wonder, I can tell you, yes, those times were better.
They weren't perfect.
We had our problems, God knows.
We had the beginnings of all of the problems that we have today.
And the reason that we have the problems that we have today is because we didn't do anything about them when they were small and manageable back in the 50s and 60s and 70s.
I'm not claiming that it was a paradise under Nixon and Reagan, certainly not under Jimmy Carter.
But yes, life as a whole was better when things were still more or less run by sexually normal white males.
So if there is ever any doubt in any of your minds, yeah, you can take it from me.
Because I don't remember.
Can you explain, like, the four phases of the Northwest homeland?
Okay.
Oh, well, I haven't actually gone into the phases for a while.
I'd probably have to check the website for that.
But the first phase, which is one that we're engaging in right now, is the creation of communities.
We are bringing in as many new people as we can.
It is a slow, slow...
It's a slow, very slow process.
I got word from one guy on the East Coast who made his scouting trip last month, and he tells me he's going to be here next month, so that's good.
He came out here, and he met with me and one of the guys, and he spent a good 10 days just driving around the Northwest and scouting out places where, you know, he wanted to live.
I still don't know where he's decided on, but he went back, and he just says, screw this, so he's closing out everything he's got back on the East Coast, and he's coming out here.
We are also beginning to get some local interest.
I've had a lot of inquiries since the beginning of the year from, well, I will say local people because some of them are far away, but people here in the Northwest, in the area that we claim for the Republic, which is the states of Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana, west of Interstate 15. And so, anyway, that's the first step, is to...
I believe very much that at some point there's going to be some event, like I've described, or some tipping point, and all of a sudden the situation is going to be almost similar to what's happening in Europe with the Muslim and the sub-Saharan African migrations.
All of a sudden white people are going to start packing their gear and they're going to start coming to the Northwest and it probably won't even be anything.
It has to do with anything that I say or anything the ENF says.
Most of them probably won't even have any idea that the Northwest Front even exists.
We get that a lot already.
We call them organic migrants.
They come here and they use all the code words and the dog whistles, as the liberals call them.
Well, we're coming for good schools, and we're coming for clean air, and we're coming for a more laid-back lifestyle, and less tense, you know?
And basically what they're saying is they're coming to get away from the blacks and the browns, especially people coming from California to get away from the Mexicans.
It's called the diversity avoidance.
So that's the first phase, basically, is building local communities to create a support system.
The next phase will be campaigning basically here in the homeland and local activism to really do what you might call missionary work among the local white people.
We don't really do too much of that right now.
There's just not enough of us, frankly.
The people who have come here, including those locally who were recruited, all have Their own lives, their own families.
They're working the standard, what is now the standard American 55 to 60 hour week.
Something I can remember from back in the old days, the 40 hour week.
We're just not in a financial or logistic position right now to have a big political effort to create some sort of Northwest NSDAP with long marching columns up here in the Northwest.
Now, the third phase will be the...
I know what I want to say, but I need to be very...
Careful here as to what I say in public.
I think for the next two phases, I need to refer people to the Northwest novels, because in there, I say in fictional form what I probably can't say openly, especially over the past year, things have gotten worse as far as constitutional rights in this country goes.
But basically, the third and the fourth phases will be the creation of a sovereign, independent nation here in the Northwest.
All of these things, by the way, can be found in our party manual, which is called the White Book.
If someone wants to get just the White Book, they can email me at nwnet, northwestnet, nwnet at earthlink.net, and I will be glad to send them a copy of the White Book in PDF format if you don't mind reading it on your computer.
If you want a full introductory packet to the party, Again, email me at nwnet at earthlink.net, and you'll need to give me a mailing address and a name.
It doesn't matter if it's your correct name, it just needs to be someplace where the post office will actually deliver the mail.
And you have to give me a name and address, and I will send you a large packet of literature, brochures, some copies of our monthly newsletter, The Northwest Observer, and I will send you a written copy of the white book, an actual proper...
And this explains all this stuff a lot better than I can do, really, just in a few words.
When we talk about, especially the later phases of a revolution which is going to establish an independent nation on this continent, I have to choose my words very carefully.
So I don't want to say something that's going to cause a knock on the door or cause my door to be kicked in at 6 o 'clock in the morning, which may happen tomorrow morning anyway.
Yeah, I understand that.
What would your response be to people who...
Kind of criticize the Northwest Imperative and say it's nothing more than a mass white flight.
Well, I get that a lot.
Basically, it's usually some variation on, well, I ain't moving nowhere, Harold.
I'm gonna stand and fight.
Okay.
Fine.
Stand and fight, then.
Let's see some of this standing and fighting.
If anybody was standing and fighting, I would be cheering them on, and if it looked like it was going to last, I'd probably be there myself.
If right now some of these neo-Confederate types in the South or the Republic of Texas or anybody like that were actually to begin seriously fighting IRA-style for independence, I would probably say, hey guys, forget the Northwest.
Let's all go to Texas, take our guns, and go down there and join the struggle.
We need a homeland.
I think it's best for us if that's in the Northwest, but if somebody else can create an Illinois free state or something like that, I mean, fine, but I don't think it's going to happen.
I should mention that there are at least two other migrations that I know of.
The libertarians have a migration, supposedly.
They're going to all move to New Hampshire and take over the state government in New Hampshire and create a libertarian paradise.
And the Christian fundamentalists have a South Carolina migration.
They're all going to move to South Carolina and take over the state of South Carolina for the great jump in Jesus.
And that's been going for longer than my own Northwest efforts have been doing.
About 20 years.
And apparently, from what I gather, they're not having any more real success than we are.
Americans are just, frankly, they just all talk.
Getting a white American to actually do anything physical off the internet is like Pulling teeth.
And so the libertarians and the tub thumpers aren't really having too much more success at it than we are.
Everyone says, well, Harold, if you put us all in one place, they'll just nuke us.
They'll nuke us, Harold.
We can't do that.
Basically, the white man is great at coming up with excuses to do nothing.
That's the one thing we still can do.
We can come up with a dozen.
Strong, logical, coherent, rational reason to continue to sit and do nothing.
We are the only tendency within the white nationalist movement that has a plan.
I just said this in my own podcast a few days ago, the one that I put up for this week.
I know people are getting really tired of hearing it, but they need to hear it until it somehow sinks into their skulls full of mush.
There is only one plant that anybody has ever come up with, and that's the Northwest Imperator as far as something that's practical and legal.
And doable.
Everybody else is just, well, we're going to sit, we're going to write blogs, and we're going to tap on our computers forever and ever while we get older and older, and then we're going to sort of crumble to dust behind our computers and let the niggers take over the world.
And that's, really, that's about it.
Anyway, I think, who is it?
Somebody else recently made another comment.
I can't remember if this was on one of the programs.
I think it was Don.
There is nothing inherently cowardly about Flight.
If you are outnumbered, outgunned, and you're about to be destroyed.
There is nothing wrong with running as long as you're running to something, not away from.
That's what I like to tell people.
When you come to the Northwest and you make your home, sink your roots, and you settle in here and become part of a nationalist community here, which we already have several, you are not running away from anything.
You're running to something.
You know, you hear a lot of these people who try to put down people, try to organize, or they try to discourage people from organizing.
And, you know, they cite various reasons how the Fed will infiltrate anything you try to do.
You know, in your experience, how justified is that line of thinking?
We have had, okay, we've been operating here in the Olympic area.
Kitsap and Pugetopolis area here, our community that we have here, that's been going since, oh, let's say 2009, when I came up here from Astoria.
So that's, what, seven years?
In that time, we have had two individuals come in, one of whom was for sure a federal informant because he later was in the news.
He got some poor old man in Spokane busted and sent to prison for 25 years.
Some old emotionally disturbed individual who was living in a Salvation Army hostel and was talking about blowing up Spokane.
I think it was a case.
See, they caught him on a marijuana grow-up.
This was before it was legal.
And they had him on a drug charge, and it was a case of he had to produce something.
And so he basically sacrificed this old man.
I know he came around here in 2010.
He was fairly plausible.
He stayed with a couple of us overnight here.
I presume he was wearing his wire then.
He didn't pick up anything that they could use or that they wanted to use, so we dodged that bullet.
There was another individual who got into a very, very bad situation legally with his son, and basically the kid did something really stupid, and the FBI came to this guy, and they had him by the balls, and they squeezed, and they demanded that he infiltrate the Northwest Front.
He agreed, because his son was about to be destroyed in every sense of the word, but to give this man credit.
The first thing he did, the first spare moment he got, he contacted me and he told me what was going on.
And he told me flat out, he said, "Look, don't invite me up there anymore.
Don't have anything more to do with me.
I'll have to tell him that you're avoiding me or whatever." But so, there was that.
And there's this one guy down there in Oregon that, for some reason, the FBI seems to...
I think they want to get him for some reason.
I don't know what he did to piss him off.
I think basically what he did was he just won't talk to him.
But they harass his...
Associates for a while, or occasionally I should say.
And there's another individual that I myself have always had suspicions of, but he's gone now.
He came and he went.
And so, yeah, they're going to try.
It's just something that you've got to learn to live with if you're going to resist or if you're going to stand up and basically be a man.
I mean, it's a choice of either live on your knees or you have to take the risk of dying on your feet.
We have several ways to deal with that.
Number one, we don't break any laws.
I know that doesn't always help.
I know that that won't always save you, but it can't hurt.
Put it that way.
Number two, we do exercise great care as to who we allow into our little communities.
We have turned people down before.
We've had people basically show up on our doorsteps and we have varying degrees of politeness told them to go elsewhere and either come back.
When they've got their max squared away or don't come back at all.
So we actually vet people before we get into contact with them as much as we can.
We don't have like any other super secret police or anything, but I've always thought it was ridiculous that you underwent more of a background check when you applied for a job at Walmart than if you wanted to join a white nationalist group.
So that helps.
You would be amazed at what you could find out about people just on the internet.
You know, I have had people contact me, Harold, Harold, we must meet.
Yes, yes, I'm converted to the Northwest.
Imperative.
Yes, I want to do this and I want to do that.
And I'm going to blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Enthusiasm.
And I'll check them out on the internet and I'll find some old MySpace or something wherein they list their perverted sexual preferences.
We've had...
We are one of the better groups, if I do say so myself, in the movement, because we do take a little bit of effort to vet people, and we just don't let anyone who has clear problems get near us.
But even so, we turn away almost as many people as we accept.
It's not their fault in a lot of cases, because Americans are just terribly, terribly damaged because of the way they've had to live for the past couple generations.
The Jews have succeeded in destroying normal in this society.
There is no more normal.
It took me a long time, but I realized that in a certain sense, I was the one who was being unreasonable by expecting a lot of these younger white people to act as I was taught to act when I grew up.
Because, I mean, hell, who's going to teach them these things?
Who's going to teach them basic morals and ethics?
Who's going to teach them character?
Where are they going to learn that?
Off MTV?
Yeah, now as far as, again, FBI infiltration goes, yes, it happens.
Their standard practice used to be, and I think it's still, they retain a bunch of individuals for a standard $400 a week, basically to move from group to group, and anywhere they can latch on, they latch on, and then once they've got someone they can potentially target for an arrest, then a bounty system kicks in.
The woman who got Dennis Mahon sent to prison supposedly collected over $100,000.
The guy that got Matt Hale sent to prison and lured him into an AOL or an AIM chat room and got him the type of single sentence that meant him getting the first sentence under the Patriot Act for a native-born white American supposedly was paid a total of $50,000 for that conviction.
So, yes, it happens.
It is simply an occupational risk.
You have to know what to look for.
You have to accept the fact that there are bad people out there trying to do you harm because they do not accept your right to be different.
You have to accept that these bad people have power and the will to hurt you.
The latest example I can think of happened in January of this year when the FBI sent 100 men to Oregon.
To gun down one old man in the snow, purely to set an example.
So let's get it clear here.
These are evil sons of bitches who are ruling us.
And yes, they're dangerous.
Yes, what we do is dangerous.
And all I can say is that duty is dangerous.
Doing what is right is dangerous.
That's the world we live in.
Well, for now our time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front.
Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310.
Or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection