All Episodes
Previous Next
April 14, 2016 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
01:01:47
20160414_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Push your wiggle, push and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token, whistle up and arching tune.
Where you're piked upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
With your piked upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
Out from many a mud-walled cabin eyes were watching through the night.
Many a manly chest was throbbing for the blessed warming light.
Wars passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
It's April the 14th, 2016.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
The first thing I want to say here is that this weekend I had the pleasure of welcoming a new migrant couple to the homeland.
They arrived on their scouting trip and met with some of us here in the Puget area on Saturday before proceeding to the area of the homeland they wanted to look at as a potential future home.
I just got an email from our contact out there who met with them.
And apparently they're just as impressed with that part of the Pacific Northwest as they thought they'd be, so it looks like they're on track to come home personally in a month or so.
Now, for obvious reasons, I can't get into too many details, but I really wish I could share these meetings with you guys so that you will know that, yes, we are in fact getting Class A people as migrants, and yes, it is in fact happening.
Slowly, slowly, slow as molasses in wintertime, but it's happening.
Okay, I said last week I'd probably start off every episode with some kind of election update.
The big news this week is that the RINOs in the state of Colorado decided that the little formality of an actual election wasn't necessary.
And so they just arbitrarily allocated 34 delegates to Ted Cruz without a single vote being cast.
Actually, by way of some election-related coverage, I think we'll let Gretchen kick off this week with her review of a book by, you guessed it, Donald Trump.
Music Good evening, comrades.
Tonight I'm going to be talking about Donald Trump's book, Crippled America.
Now, I had some remarks already prepared, and then I listened to the Thursday night debate.
So I want to, first of all, amend these remarks with a kind of addendum, and in my opinion, kind of a post-mortem.
After...
The post-Super Tuesday debate, it appears that some issues have come up regarding the credibility of Trump.
Now, I understand that the media is against him and all of that, but still, I think there's enough fire where the smoke is that, in my opinion, it's very possible that at this point, campaign is going to come to a standstill.
So if anyone was worried he might be a successful candidate, I believe that issue is now over.
Now this is, of course, just my opinion.
I could be totally wrong.
This campaign season has been full of surprises.
But at any rate, to me, I've started to really question whether he really wants to limit immigration.
As one example, one notable example, he has softened his position on specialist visas.
There's now a lot of question as to whether he was ever really serious about his radical position on Mexicans or maybe even Muslims, for that matter.
Who knows?
So I would imagine that anyone watching that Thursday night most recent debate would have lost faith in him, which is quite depressing, but it's the truth.
Now, I also tend to believe the other two frontrunners are basically stuffed shirts, so this is not to endorse them.
And of course, the Republicans hope that by running one of two Hispanics, they will win, even though I see this as unlikely.
Now, despite...
What I see as a disastrous debate, Trump is still endorsed by Newt Gingrich very enthusiastically and also by the governor of Arizona.
So now I'm going to talk about the body of the book itself.
What got me really interested in reading this book and looking more seriously at the Trump candidacy is that Trump has been endorsed by Jean Marie Le Pen, David Duke, Daily Stormer and also Freedom Maine Radio.
Clearly, Trump is best known for his attempt or his alleged attempt to restrain the Global South.
But when Trump speaks of this, he speaks only about legality.
New Order of Wisconsin does not endorse Trump.
They state that the problem is biological, so elections are not that important.
Now, Trump has also stated that he wants to end birthright citizenship.
So, this would end anchor babies, but it would also perhaps allow citizenship to be stripped from anyone.
Like Reagan, Trump desires a strong military.
The upside of this is that Trump could be effective in defeating ISIS, and...
Indeed, he's made statements about being very ruthless with Muslim terrorists.
On the downside of this, if someone hoped for a rebellion brought on by the atrophy of the military system, such an atrophy would not happen under Trump, I don't think, because if Trump is to be taken at his word, he would strengthen and further modernize the US military.
Trump has stated that many countries have U.S. military bases, and they would be asked to pay for their protection-slash-occupation.
Now, this would include Germany, and it would be interesting to see if this affects Germany's desire to remain in NATO.
Also, it's interesting to see what effect, if any, this would have on the UE in general.
Certainly it would be a positive step, in my view, if by some miracle Europe could be less mastered by American globalism, but that's a lot of conjecture and that would be quite a miracle indeed.
Trump has claimed to be very upset with the Iran deal and he would have preferred to continue with tough sanctions.
Now Trump claims that he will be neutral on the question of Israel.
Now, of course, New Order questions this.
When these various occupied countries pay for their occupation, Trump wants to reinvest in American infrastructure.
And this promise is at least believable to me because Trump is nothing if not a builder.
Now, many of us tend to probably think of Trump as a job creator.
Trump states in Crippled America that with him at the helm, many Americans will want to join the government.
But he does note that due to budget cuts, there will be fewer employees overall.
But Trump does assure us that he wants to take America back from big money interests.
Trump's situation is remarkable in that due to his immense wealth, he's able to fund his own campaign.
And so, at least theoretically, he is beholden to no one.
Trump argues that most people do need Social Security and insurance that covers pre-existing conditions.
But some wealthy elderly don't need Social Security.
Now, Trump believes that Obamacare is too expensive.
He wants individuals to be able to pursue care across straight lines.
Because increased competition between states will lower the cost.
Trump wants very much to simplify the tax code.
He wants fewer tax brackets and a lowering of overall tax rates.
Now, the poorest will not pay income tax, and others will only have a one-page form.
So he wants to eliminate tax deductions for the very rich.
However, businesses will pay no more than 15% tax.
Trump makes an interesting statement in this book.
He says that it's not unpatriotic for businesses to move offshore for a lower tax rate.
But he does say that we need to welcome businesses.
So it sounds like Trump's strong patriotism can yield in some cases to the interest of business.
And again, we also see this in the question of specialist visas.
Now, it's also important to note that Trump very much admires Reagan, and I think Stiles himself, according to Reagan, Reagan, if you recall, did grant amnesty and did bring in the NAFTA agreement.
Now, despite wanting a large and impressive military, Trump is also for gun rights, and he does acknowledge that the Second Amendment is not just put there for sports enthusiasts.
However, on the other side, you can't really secede from a tyrannical government with just some guns, no matter how many you have.
There have to be other factors involved, as Harold has said.
Now, Trump is for local education and he's against Common Core.
This position is likely to be favored by a lot of homeschool enthusiasts, although Common Core would not affect them anyway.
Now, Trump is an enthusiast for the reassertion of Christianity, at least in a public sense.
Although this is not an executive function, Trump wants people to say Merry Christmas rather than Happy Holidays.
And he wants more public manger scenes.
However, he says that his religious beliefs won't influence his business decisions.
Now, because of his influence in the business world, Trump obviously knows how to make deals.
Trump is officially Republican, but he has been criticized as not entirely conservative.
He used to be a Democrat, and he's known to be a donor to some Democrats.
However, he notes that Reagan also used to be a Democrat.
Now, this whole issue of Democrats versus Republicans, left and right, this really ought not to be an issue for us, because white nationalism is, after all, despite what many believe, we're really not a conservative movement per se, we're a pro-white movement.
Now, sadly, in my opinion, Trump is not an environmentalist.
Like many in our movement, he claims to be unsure about global warming, and he's also an enthusiast for frocking.
However, or frocking, I should say.
However, Trump loves to give himself loopholes, and he says that while wind power is not practical now, it could be someday.
Thus, he throws the environmentalist a crumb.
Now, Trump, as a Christian, Does express a fundamentally pro-life position, but he has also admitted from time to time that he believes in some exceptions to this, and he also claims that he would defund Planned Parenthood.
However, he says that Planned Parenthood does some good things as far as women's health.
I know that many white nationalists see themselves as conservative on these types of issues and tend to dislike abortion.
However, it is well to be remembered that not all babies are white, and there are those that come into the world with birth defects.
Now, Trump once again is to be commended as the only candidate that would see a comedown in circumstances by moving into the White House.
The real question is this.
Trump could potentially be an effective president if he wanted to.
However, the most effective president may only serve as ballast for a sinking ship.
So, do we really want such a ballast?
Or, in the end, would even that do more harm than good?
Also, too, he really is an unknown quantity.
So, that is something to really contemplate, ask ourselves if supporting Trump is the right course of action.
I was going to say that this dilemma will face us in November and that we must give a great deal of thought to this.
However, once again, after seeing the Thursday night debate after Super Tuesday, I am now starting to really question that assertion because although, once again, the media was certainly after him in that debate, they did bring up many really pertinent questions about his brand and about his ability and his willingness to restrain the Global South.
So, it made me very disillusioned on the question of a Trump presidency.
So, I thank you very much for listening.
I know I'm going on a bit long here, but I do have a lot to say on this matter.
So, I hope you consider all these questions very much in the solemn and thoughtful way that you should, if indeed he does come onto the ballot in November.
So thank you very much for listening, comrades, and hail victory.
Thank you.
This is Loudtronics.
I've named the Jews Stein after Stein Every last sentence Is a verbal hate crime Tasted Trump steaks I've cooked a few I've had conservatives tricking my race.
Now I see it through.
We are the Trump Awakened
and roused, he rose to the call.
He brought us hats and dubstep and everything that goes with it.
Let's build the wall.
But they said Jeb was chosen.
A bush couldn't lose.
Donald stumped him and everyone else in the race, even Lion's head crews!
One, one, one, one!
We are the Trumpians, my friends!
We're beating up shitlamps'til the end!
We are the Trumpians!
We are the Trumpians!
No cuts or losers,'cause we are the Trumpians!
We are the Trumpians, my friends!
We're beating up shitlamps'til the end!
We are the Trumpians!
We are the Trumpians!
No cuts, no losers,'cause we are the Trumpians!
We are the Trumpians!
We are the Trumpians!
you Okay, for the past couple of episodes, we've been a little bit short on listener contributions, but this week, we've got a kind of an embarrassment of riches along that line, so there will be somewhat less of my Grandpa Simpson-like rambling in this show.
And no kidding, guys, it's vitally important that people other than myself be given a voice here.
The Northwest Front is not and cannot be a one-man band.
Without you people, and the people like the couple who we met this weekend, and the men who are meeting them out there in a wild ways to the Republic, I'm just an old fart who wrote a bunch of books nobody reads.
You keep asking me to produce the magic beans and make it all happen.
Well, you guys are my magic beans.
But before we go on, I want to lay out some inside baseball type stuff for you guys.
First off, J.P. Morgan once summarized his philosophy of life for his son.
Never explain, never apologize.
Well, as you know, I violate that first part all the time.
I'm constantly explaining things to you guys.
I just can't get anybody to listen.
Now, apologies are another matter.
I don't do those very often at all, but I'm going to repeat one now, which, if memory serves, I first tendered about this time last year.
Every week, I get long, detailed, and serious letters and emails from people out there asking me intelligent, thoughtful, and serious questions about the Northwest Imperative.
Questions that deserve lengthy and detailed and carefully composed replies on my part.
Or they want to discuss other topics which are highly germane to the Northwest independence struggle.
Or they want me to look at certain websites and videos on YouTube and articles on the web and comment on them.
And to be sure, most of these links that people send me do in fact connect to material that is highly interesting and deserves to be viewed and disseminated with extensive commentary because it would be useful propaganda.
Or they ask my help with various things.
For instance, this week a man has located a very good young racial nationalist writer he wants me to take under my wing and mentor.
By email, of course.
And apparently this kid and me both could benefit from such an association because this guy seems to be quite sharp.
Now, I realize that frankly for the past year or so, more so than usual, I have not been giving very good customer service.
You guys are getting slow responses.
You are getting responses that are no more than monosyllabic grunts that I've got in your last email or letter.
And all too often, you have been getting no response at all because once an email slips down too low in the queue, it tends to be forgotten.
I have also been criticized for using email too much anyway when I should be calling people on the phone and talking to them personally.
Now, I don't know if I've ever mentioned this on the show before.
I think I have.
The number of people who have my phone number is very limited.
It has to be.
If I published it or if I was promiscuous about letting people have my number or anybody, hey, here's my number, give me a call sometime, the trouble is they'd take me at my word and I would end up spending hours and hours and hours on the phone.
I actually had to cancel my last political campaign back in 1990 because Dr. Edward feels, purely in the spirit of being helpful, without my permission, Published my phone number.
The result was I ended up spending 8 to 12 hours per day, and that is not an exaggeration, at least that long, on the telephone, taking calls from, frankly, middle-aged and elderly men who were calling because they were lonely, and they wanted to say the word nigger.
I can't let that happen again.
I'm sorry.
Again, it's just the way it is, guys.
If I were to let myself, I would be spending just all my entire day doing nothing but yakking on the phone and that can't happen.
Now, there are other reasons why this is happening.
It's not because I'm getting lazy or sloppy or complacent or because I'm becoming too arrogant and dismissive and big for my britches to associate with a hoi polloi or any horse manure like that.
Some people have kind of maybe gotten that impression.
One guy kind of got miffed.
He felt I was dissing him by refusing to deal with his thing that he wanted me to do.
That was one of those cases where the email just simply slipped down so far in the queue that, just to be honest, I forgot about it.
And I can understand how people would get pissed off at stuff like that.
Nor will I now descend into a long, whining litany of querulous old man complaint about how hard my life is.
That is a horrible habit of the elderly, and Grandpa Simpson jokes aside, I need to see if I can avoid it.
I know it just irritates people, and in any case, nobody ever listens or cares what the aging have to say, which is one of the more stupid traits that white people have developed over the past few generations, but there it is.
Guys, you're just going to have to take my word for it on this.
I know I'm not giving some of you your props and it really pisses me off, but it simply can't be any other way.
There are serious and valid reasons of a medical, financial, and logistic nature as to why I can't appear as energetic on the surface as I would like to appear.
And rather than degenerate into me bitching and moaning about it all, I just have to tell you that it is what it is, as much as I wish it wasn't.
I periodically get invitations from people, some of whose names you would probably recognize, to join in various circle jerks, which they style committees of correspondence after the leadership of the American Revolutionary Patriot Movement of the 1770s.
Yes, some of them actually use that term, committees of correspondence, which in practice means a bunch of middle-aged to elderly white men huddled behind computers and writing effete blogs and long emails designed to show how brilliant they are.
In which not one single shot is actually fired against the monster that's killing us all.
Guys, I'm not Thomas Jefferson sitting in his study at Monticello at his exquisite Louis Kahn's escritoire with a crackling log fire and writing long and elegant letters to John Adams or George Washington or Benjamin Franklin with a quill and parchment.
Jeez, I wish I was.
But I'm not.
None of us are.
We are most of us timid and frightened and aging men who have just enough conscience remaining to make a few token protests on the internet in forums which nobody reads except a few dozen of our own kind.
The Northwest Front is doing a little bit better than that, as witness our visitors here in the Sound Area this weekend.
At least some actual, physical, real-world activity is taking place, and around the country a few pale asses are indeed rising from the sofa or climbing the stairs out of Mom and Dad's basement and looking out blinking into the sunlight outside.
I'm doing my best to accelerate this process, but for the time being, my responses to your very welcome emails and letters, all of which I read, are in most cases going to be a bit terse.
That's just the way it is.
I'm sorry.
Anyway, here's Andy.
Hey all, Andy here again.
A quick note before my actual segment gets going.
Just about all of you are going to recognize this next item as a repeat.
As usual, our apologies, but this one's apropos.
Following the episode of RFN, wherein a herald laid it all out, a few of the regular sorts of responses reared their heads again.
One of these usual responses is that of having dependents, which keep people tied to their current geographic locations.
As it so happens, I've covered this before.
So I'm going to replay that submission today.
I don't want to single this guy out, the one who's responsible for people, but since coming home myself, I've seen many others do the same who were quote-unquote responsible for people.
So that by itself doesn't prevent migration.
You'll note my submission on having dependents dealt with elders in general, but we had that specific concern vocalized again as well.
And no, I don't mean to call that guy out either.
And the issue of elders aside, the ideas I discuss can be applied to dependents of all ages.
It may be there are some situations which are well and truly unresolvable in the short term, but those will be few and far between.
My next RFN segment is going to address why I'm such a jerk all the time, and my need to replay this submission is actually a perfect lead-in to such, as it will provide a great example to work off of next time I'm on.
Talk to you then, comrades.
From time to time, there are remarks I need to make in response to subjects which are highly emotional, and I usually decide to wait until the fury dies down in order to avoid dealing with the inflammatory aspect of the matter.
For example, I could write a dissertation on the Bundy Ranch nonsense and how it demonstrates the utter lies people tell the party about their inability to migrate, but it was so long ago that most of the Americans in the audience probably don't remember the sequence of events I'm referencing.
It has, after all, been over a year since that wreck was a news item.
I may eventually cover that just for the sake of getting my thoughts out there, but I'd have to sneak up on people with it since my comments won't make me any friends.
In fact, I may not do myself any favors tonight, either, but things need to be said.
A couple of months ago, there was a discussion going back and forth from various RFN contributors and some e-hangers-on by way of comments on a couple of RFN episodes.
From time to time, one of the reasons the party is given for someone's inability to come home is their need to care for elderly or otherwise dependent relatives.
While Stefan and Annie made perfectly valid, helpful, and practical points in their presentation which dealt with this exactly, I actually need to explore some deeper and more fundamental aspects of this situation with you all.
Now, provided those of you making this claim are honest and accurate, which is a twist I'll cover in a moment, there's a very obvious, reasonable, and civilized way to proceed in your situation.
The same day, in early February, when I recorded that long panel discussion with comrades Don and AJ, I pitched this concept to them to make sure I wasn't out of my mind or overstating my position, and they agreed I was right on the money.
Admittedly, Don had to admonish me to be a little less rigid and forceful, and I suppose he was right to do so.
Nevertheless, the position of having your familial elders dependent on you puts you in the position of being the breadwinner.
In the case of emotional dependence or other types of need, you're still the breadwinner, but not of financial resources.
And since you're the one providing what your family members need, you're the one calling the shots.
In past generations, as well as our own, elderly or other infirm relatives who truly needed support usually end up moving in with those they depend on.
Granted, this is usually not by choice, since it's very similar, in more ways than one, to our childhood years.
That's usually an upsetting condition to be in, and sure, no one likes it when their parents or other family members have no other choice.
This is mostly because it makes us imagine what our own golden years will be like.
Nevertheless, this is the ultimate form of dependency and it's very akin to having your parents make decisions for you when you were a child.
At best, your own input was politely asked for, but this usually wasn't the case.
Don reminded me that because these dependent family members of yours are likely adults of sound mind, asking their opinion about your moving to the Pacific Northwest is perfectly fine, regardless of whether or not they currently bunk under your roof or theirs.
But remember, you're the one calling the shots.
In any sort of family, the people bringing home the bacon, financial or otherwise, are the ones in control because it's their responsibility to keep providing.
They're the ones who get to make the big decisions, even if those they support don't always like it.
Moving to better conditions for the family is perhaps the most drastic, yet most practical, choice which can be made, and it certainly falls under the umbrella of leadership decisions a head of household might be faced with.
For years now, one of the reasons we've been told not to expect people to migrate is that they can't stand how a move will affect their children.
You can take my word for it.
Nothing bad happens.
As adults, we all know that adolescent concerns are just that and nothing more.
Like with younger children, whatever it is they're worried about will be a distant memory in a month, if not sooner.
True, it's a bit harder with actual adults, but if they truly depend on you, they'll just have to come along.
No, really, that's how this works.
That's how it has always worked.
It has to be this way, because survival is involved, and survival usually requires one person to call the shots and have everyone else fall in line.
Truth be told, these concerns are actually a type of narcissism.
Yeah, really, here's the deal.
A person's class, be it social or economic, is frequently demonstrated by what their dependents have access to, and more importantly, what they do not have to do.
Sure, most parents dote on their children when they're able, but this doting is frequently made into a public display, which reinforces whatever class standing the provider sees themselves as having attained.
The party occasionally has to explain why everyone's children must have a required stint in the NAR's National Labor Force, and it's for this exact same reason.
The inability to avoid work or inconvenience isn't pleasant, and it is absolutely a shock to the modern American psyche.
The inability to shield your dependents, children or otherwise, from the same problems we all face means you're not exactly the elite you pretend to be.
Now, as I said earlier, so far I've been pretending everyone is honest with us and has accurately described their situation as their elder being dependent on them and not the other way around.
I almost didn't want to go here today, but when I pitched this concept to Don and AJ, the conversation almost immediately went in this direction, so I'm not the only one thinking it.
Periodically, the party is given some reason for outright refusal of Northwest migration, and it's obviously sugarcoating a screw-up.
My personal favorite was one instance where someone made their penchant for risky property speculation into a situation where they were I like this example because it's only a real estate deal if you're a professional investor.
Otherwise, what really happened is you took a huge gamble and lost.
I'm not trying to rub it in, but I do need to insist on a little bit of honesty.
Honesty is the basis of this deep and objective inventory of our own moral characters you've periodically heard about here on Radio Free Northwest.
Oh, look!
It's the character issue again.
Yay!
No, but really, this is a problem.
Over the years, the party has turned detecting internet bullshit into an art form.
And this I have dependent elders excuse is starting to sound a lot like I'm economically or emotionally tied to my relatives because I can't support myself.
While I understand this situation is becoming more and more common than any of us is comfortable with, being unable to admit what is actually going on is nothing short of denial and avoidance.
Further, BSing the party about it is even worse since you're actually trying to convince yourself by convincing other people.
I once gave a talk on RFN about solving problems and how running your life on autopilot is a bad idea.
While that was all well and good as far as RFN material goes, the precursor to solving problems is admitting they exist, which, of course, goes back to performing this character self-examination we keep talking about.
Do it.
And please, do it right.
Hail victory, comrades.
Okay, I mentioned earlier we have a number of contributions this week by way of audio files from our listeners.
I keep getting requests to put more Northwest migrants on here, I guess so people will know I'm not pulling your leg, and yes, it really is happening.
Okay, fair enough.
This is a mother and daughter team from down in Oregon.
Hi, I'm Axelina.
And I'm Gertrude.
And we're here to talk about stuff white people should like.
We are here to talk about the horrid website run by the libs that mock white people.
Their pointless and empty existence, not ours.
On the flip side, there's stuff black people don't like, but that's pretty much everything white, and we want to uplift our people and talk about the good things about whites and white culture, not degrading and depressing ourselves or wallowing in the false culture that's been erected and forced down our throats for the past upteen years.
That leaves the impression that white culture is depraved and wicked.
So our first topic will be the monolith, the 800-pound gorilla, the bugaboo that hides under every feminist bed and in her underwear drawer that gives her creeper thrills.
Patriarchy!
So what is patriarchy?
The official definition is a system of society or government in which the father or the eldest male is the head of the family, and descent is traced through the male line.
A system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it.
You notice how it immediately goes to the negative.
It goes from a somewhat reasonable explanation of male descent, and it immediately turns into oppression and women being excluded from power.
So, what feminists have to say about this is a good point.
Feminist theory defines patriarchy as an unjust social system that enforces gender roles and is oppressive.
It often includes any social mechanism that evokes male dominance over women.
Dun, dun, dun.
Feminist theory typically characterizes patriarchy as a social construction which can be overcome by revealing and critically analyzing its manifestations.
Ah, feminist bitch fest.
My favorite.
Absolutely.
And not to mention having to share bathrooms with fake men.
Oh yeah, and then all the rape culture crap and all the crazy things.
According to these crazy people, whites are the only people that are racist and only men are oppressors of women.
But what does feminism look like in practice?
Women usurping men's roles.
Most modern movies and TV shows pointing this out, the you-go-girl phenomenon of women kicking males' butts like completely badasses.
Women preachers, women firefighters, women pretending to be army rangers, etc.
Yeah, you know, through the feminist movement, men are taught to supplicate to their wives instead of being taught to be the leaders of their home in proper biblical authority.
They're told, do more house chores, be romantic, listen to your wives, take care of the children, let the women lead.
And doing the dishes is supposed to be sexy?
Give me a man working on a piece of equipment over that any day.
I can do my own dishes, thanks.
Yeah, I have to agree.
Men who work with their hands are much more sexier.
Yeah, this leads to women being unhappy, and women need authority and leadership.
They end up taking more and more power and control the more men concede over, and they give less and less of themselves, and you end up with...
Divorce rape!
Ability to use the courts to take property men earned and hand it over to the women who divorced their husbands because they are unhappy, who probably ignored the needs of their children Yeah, that men who go their own way phenomenon is really sad.
We were sent an interesting article the other day about men going their own way.
This is the saddest bit that I saw in the whole article.
I'm going to quote from it here.
Seventy percent of American males between the ages 20 and 34 are not married, and many live in a state of perpetual adolescence with ominous consequences for the nation's future.
Far too many young men have failed to make a normal progression into adult roles of responsibility and self-sufficiency, roles generally associated with marriage and fatherhood.
The high percentage of bachelors means a bleak prospect for millions of young women who dream about a wedding day that may never come.
Young women who adhere to a moral code and refuse to participate in the hookup culture are now considered social misfits, and they face even more daunting odds of finding a husband than their promiscuous sisters.
You have some experience in that area with the online dating, right?
I do.
It's scary culture out there.
There's a lot of guys out there that are liars, and they will say that they want a long-term relationship, but if you're not promiscuous in a girl that will send inappropriate pictures or text messages, they do this thing that's called ghosting, where they will talk to you, but if you're not the kind of girl that'll send those kind of inappropriate text messages or pictures, they'll just ghost you, and then you'll never hear from them again.
Or worse yet, they'll text you four or five months down the road and want to do some kind of weird booty call thing like that one dude that you went out to dinner with.
And then he called you a few months later and he just wanted to do a hookup.
I remember how mad you were about that.
It was pretty gross.
The whole hookup culture is pretty gross.
It is.
I've just never been that kind of person that was into that kind of culture.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, you're one of those young women who are considered social misfits because you do adhere by a moral code.
Don't you love how...
That article says moral code.
They don't want to say the truth, which is Christianity.
That is the moral code that they're referring to.
Another piece of cover-up.
And it's actually something really good for a future topic would be that as well.
So what should patriarchy look like?
At its most basic, it's a kin-based social structure, which is a source of safety and well-being for women and children.
That's family.
Strong family and kinship ties give men hope and something to work for.
Second, patriarchy involves something feminists claim is bad, but which is in fact one of the greatest boons to mankind, namely the idea that the wife and children belong to the patriarch, not like slaves or doormats, but people who are interconnected with one another through kinship and authority.
This ownership gives the man a motivation to protect his wife and daughters and sons from threats, chiefly other men.
There is no other hope of safety for women.
Women can only be safe from men, especially non-white men, if other white men defend them.
That men, of course, always being code for non-white whenever you hear somebody say, women must be protected from dangerous men.
The most dangerous men on two legs are not white men in terms of two women.
And that's why I carry a gun.
Exactly.
Concealed carry.
Definitely.
So in addition, moral codes are invariably the product of patriarchy.
Notice that now that patriarchy is being systematically eradicated in the West, morals are similarly disappearing.
Women certainly are capable of being moral.
Though they generally require male authority to be so, but inventing and maintaining moral code seems to be beyond them.
When women have a significant amount of power in society, morality collapses.
Take a good look around outside, online, pretty much everywhere.
Do you like the world we live in?
No?
Thank women for that.
Really, we should be talking about repealing the 19th Amendment, but that's a topic for another day.
Women get to be women, not men with fake boobs.
We get to have and cherish our children, make our own home, support our men in tackling the world, and head on in giving them a safe place to land.
Our children get to know who their father is and grow up in the circle of his protection and authority.
In kinship groups, we form stable communities of loving, like-minded, same-race peoples, not diversity.
Strangers have no vested interest in the development of our children into functional adults.
Together we form tribes, and we stand together, turning to one another in interdependence, aligned with the natural, Yahovah-given order, because we choose to, we deeply desire to, the way we were designed to.
That's the world we want to live in, and that's why the Northwest Imperative is To victory!
Speaking of genuinely manly men and their lady loves...
This is John Tams from the Sharps Rifles soundtrack.
I thought I heard the colonel crying.
March, brave boys.
There's no denying.
Cannons roaring, drums a-beating.
March, brave boys.
There's no retreating.
Long, farewell.
Long, farewell.
If I should fall In far-off battle Bugles call Valiant hearts are oftentimes broken.
Oh, farewell.
And leave me never overwell.
Oh, farewell.
I thought I heard the girl crying.
March, brave boys, there's no denying.
Cannons roaring, drums a-beating March, brave boys, there's no retreating Lord, farewell Lord, farewell
Okay, some more inside baseball stuff real quick.
First off, this episode of Radio Free Northwest will probably be uploaded onto the site sometime on Wednesday the 13th, which is later than usual, I admit, but it's due to an internet outage on my grid or whatever.
A reminder to all you folks, technically speaking, Radio Free Northwest is not late until after 8pm Pacific Time on Thursdays.
That has always been our official airtime, even since the show started over six years ago.
Generally, I get it out of the way and uploaded by Monday or Tuesday, but you'll note that it's always dated on the Thursday.
Another little indicator, people, that all this internet and technology stuff with all the bells and whistles is great, so long as it works.
One of these days it's going to stop working.
The computers and the internet are just going to go down and they won't come back up again.
Now this is why the Northwest Front insists on having a physical mailing address from anyone who wants to become part of this.
We need some way to communicate with our own people.
The time may well come when it's back to envelopes and postage stamps.
Speaking of mailing, I need to warn those of you who are on the organizational letter list that it's probably going to be late this month.
I try to get it out by the 15th of every month, but this week, Guess what?
Something came up!
I will spare you the usual chorus of that particular golden oldie.
Now, a special shout-out to Comrade Eric from Sweden.
Yes, I got your audio file on the CD, and I know I promised that I would play it this week, but I'm running way long, and my fans, I guess you'd call them, appear to get upset if they don't get their weekly Herald ration.
Again, that shouldn't be.
This whole thing needs to be a lot more northwest and a lot less herald.
But that doesn't seem to be the way that things are rolling in the real world.
I've just removed a comment that I made at this point, which would have really caused the excrement to hit the fan.
We won't go into that.
Eric, I swear on Odin's beard, I will get you in next week.
This next gets back to something I spoke of earlier about my general paucity of response, and I want to give another shout-out.
To a man in New Jersey whose lengthy and detailed letter I have received along with his first month's party dues.
Comrade, I have the letter.
I have read it and I will respond as soon as I can in as much detail as I can.
I know this sounds like a weak and lame excuse, but things keep coming up here.
Literally every day now.
Minor stupid crises that would be normally handled by normal people by just taking it all in stride and dealing with it.
But neither the people involved nor our situation is normal.
It's got all these weird and incredibly annoying little ramifications and exceptions and special cases and yes buts.
And beyond that, I can't really tell you more because there are people listening to this podcast who should not be and who are data mining it for anything that they can use to do harm.
Getting back to our new man in Jersey, you're going to hear from me soon.
Now, I'd like to make a few comments from my wicked, evil, racist, male...
Chauvinist, patriarchal point of view on what the ladies from Oregon were saying.
We've gotten into this whole gender war between whites thing before on this show, but maybe it's time we revisited it.
I, too, got the article from my friend in London about something called MGTOW, Men Going Their Own Way.
And there's some pretty instructive YouTube videos online about it as well.
This is not a good development, but until such time as we find some courage and take certain implements out of the closets and the locked cabinets and start using them...
Then we're not going to see any good developments anywhere regarding anything.
To sum up, MGTO is a kind of formal version of anti-feminism for white men, since non-white men clearly don't practice any kind of feminism.
This is something that's been very late in coming, but which I predicted would eventually make its appearance.
It's not an organization, it's a philosophy of life, so to speak.
Although I imagine we'll pretty soon have NOM as the male version of now.
And even further divide white men and women until the breach is a mile high and completely irreparable and no more white infants are being born at all, which is, of course, the object of the whole feminist exercise.
Basically, MGTOW can be summarized in seven words.
Why bother?
It's just not worth it.
Now, I'm going to play devil's advocate here.
It's not just white women who are messed up in their heads.
21st century American men have a lot of moral and emotional problems as well, and we need to talk about those.
The most common complaint white women have about us is our refusal to grow up and mature and take on adult responsibility.
That's kind of hard to do when the only job you can get is delivering pizzas or pushing a broom or working behind the counter in a convenience store, but that's a whole other aspect of the thing we won't get into at the moment.
Now, of course, we find that a lot of times women's demand to quote-unquote grow up and accept responsibility is really a code word for do what a woman tells you and allow her to dominate the relationship, but that's part of the whole larger problem which we have to resolve through the 14 words.
Now, you know, as an aside, there are very few problems in this world that couldn't be solved through a mass slaughter of Jews.
Anyway, I'm going to describe the typical attitude I've found, not so much among stoners and slackers and out-of-the-bus driver types and emasculated liberal pajama boy types, but among what might be called reasonably level-headed, more or less responsible younger men.
The type of young men who still might pull the whole race out of all this if they can never get their act together and unite behind the Northwest imperative.
By this, I mean white men who have not succumbed to being total basement dwellers who deliver pizzas and exist on their computer screens, younger men who understand the moral necessity of actually holding down a job in the real world that actually pays money so that they can live independently one step above their parents' basement in a crumbling, ticky-tacky apartment or a trailer park.
Young men who did not dick off in school or waste four years chugging at keggers in college to get a useless degree in English lit and run up $50,000 in student loan debt and end up living in their parents' basement.
Now that's assuming that they had two parents, which is something you can assume less and less about white people these days, as single-parent families are becoming the norm for us as well as for the blacks.
Although in our case, there's usually only one child per single-parent family, whereas nigger and Mexican baby mamas have five or six.
We're starting to act like niggers in more ways than the blaring rap music that comes out of our car stereos.
Sorry, I'm babbling again.
Anyway, yeah, there are a few young white men who are in fact semi-responsible, which is about as good as it gets these days.
Probably more of those kind than we suspect, and I think it's likely that these guys are the reason the country has survived as long as it has because they're keeping it going.
My last extended contact with quote-unquote normal younger white males was 15 years ago, but from what I can observe on the net and in the culture, this deteriorating attitude that leads to MGTOW runs something like this,
quote, Yeah, that's a common one.
Anyway, back to MGTOW.
About age thirty-eight or so, she will go all Femi, and for her midlife crisis decide to trade me in for a jazzier model, probably non-white, or another woman, or a sheepdog.
And I will then spend the next 20 years of my life as a piece of financial livestock, supporting a family I'm not allowed to be part of, and children I'm never allowed to see outside prison-like court-ordered restrictions, which involve me groveling to this bitch for permission to come to my own daughter's birthday party so that I can hear my child call my wife's latest creep boyfriend, Daddy.
Why spend my life eating bologna sandwiches in that crumbling, ticky-tacky apartment or double-wide where the plywood bathroom floor sags that Harold's talking about, while I pay literally half my net paycheck every month to support kids who have been carefully indoctrinated to hate me by my ex-wife and her new Mexican boyfriend?
Why let the stupid bitch play me for a lifelong fool like that?
Why not just avoid the whole process and never let it get started to begin with?
Now make no mistake, this attitude is horribly wrong, and in its own way it's just as much a danger to our racial survival as feminism.
Feminism and MGTOW are two sides of the same poisonous tree, pardon my mixed metaphors, but I can understand it, and I'll bet almost every man listening to me can as well.
Men have become so completely emasculated and beaten down that, by and large, they do put up with this kind of mistreatment at the hands of women and at the hands of the court system.
Millions of us.
Although there are occasional bloody and horrible exceptions where some guy finally snaps and flips out with a gun or something of the kind, which I utterly deplore and condemn, because the conditions which brought these incidents about should never have been allowed to arise in this country in the first place.
Men did.
People forget that up until within living memory, white men actually did run things in America.
Whatever power the Clintons and the Obamas and the feminists and the faggots and the niggers and the Democrats have, we allowed them to take from us.
This applies to pretty much the whole crisis.
It's a crisis that us dumbass white men allowed to happen because we became weak and lazy and stupid and cowardly.
We allowed ourselves to drink the Jewish Kool-Aid, not to mention drink way too much damn beer.
White men are frankly scared to become involved with white women because we've seen what happens in our own lives or to guys we know.
Every man has horror stories to tell, even if they're not his own.
Once burned twice shy, and usually beginning in high school or even junior high, By the early to mid-twenties, most white men have had at least a few bad experiences which indicate to them just how badly damaged white women are inside.
And oh, are they damaged.
Oh, that last one of mine.
Usually by age 25 or so at the latest, an American white boy has his own fund of horror stories to tell about his relationships with girls that went sour or just completely cray-cray because the girl was just plain.
Nuts.
Now, by the time they leave college and settle down in their parents' basement for the long haul, say at age 27 or 28, if they run up another 50 grand for graduate school, most white boys will have up-close-and-personal familiarity with what's been done to young white women by their American upbringing of feminism, neo-Marxism, junk food, and you-go-girl Buffy the Vampire Slayer TV and pop culture, usually followed by four years at a liberal arts college.
The white man has become all too familiar with the train wreck that is the American female mind and heart, and since he has no higher purpose himself, other than his own self-interest, he wants nothing to do with it.
The best way I ever heard this put was by a young man in his twenties, out in the smoke hole, at my last serious job in Texas.
This was a long time ago, but if I can remember it correctly, this kid put it something like this, and I quote, Yeah, the first few months when you're new together and everything is going good and there's no moods and you're coming home to something pleasant at night, it's great.
But usually pretty quick after the first couple of months or so, the mood swings and the whole bipolar scene starts.
The first signs of surliness and bitchiness appear.
The bad times start to outnumber the good times.
And then there are no more good times and it's nothing but a long stretch of bad road until the crash comes.
So, two people who should by rights be standing side by side and hand in hand, facing down a world that wants to kill them, are instead sending each other insults and abuse on Twitter and Facebook.
Odd to think that that girl you Gamergate guys are howling abuse at online might have been destined to be your wife, if both of you could somehow have kept that liberal Jewish Kool-Aid away from your lips, huh?
By the way, no, that's not me slipping into covert comments on my own lifetime of marital and sexual train wrecks.
Mine have always been genuinely catastrophic in a very operatic way.
They include alcoholism, treachery, adultery, theft, madness, and murder.
I may not be able to make a revolution, but my love life reads like a Greek tragedy written by the Marx Brothers.
Okay, what the hell do we do about all this?
Because unlike most of our problems, this man-woman thing is in fact something we can actually start working on right now.
If I could ever get anybody to listen to me and take it seriously.
There have been repeated suggestions about trying to set up a white dating site online, and I think a few of these have actually been tried in the past.
I think Stormfront and VNN actually had sections like that for a while, but they had to give it up because, like any dating site, the trolls simply made it impossible.
Anything to do with sex and the trolls descend like clouds of mosquitoes out of a swamp.
Now, if we did have a site like that, can you imagine what would happen when the left loons and antifas and whatnot found it?
The big joke, of course, would be to pose as women online and inveigle our young guys into saying or doing or posting something online that they shouldn't, and then using that to humiliate and abuse them in the 14 words.
Come on, guys, let's just agree we're not going to fall for that one, okay?
Neither men nor women could ever really trust anything the site said or did.
Men especially, to be honest, couldn't trust any profiles claiming to be female.
There would be too much likelihood of a troll, or it might be the Holy Rabbi Hyman Hebelbaum from Temple Schmuck-El working for the ADL, or it might be one of these very strange guys on alt-right who pose as women on Twitter.
Some of the things I'm starting to pick up on there are very creepy and disturbing.
I think all white people of all ages must be a little bit nuts by now.
If such a thing as a white nationalist dating site were tried, it would require a level of security in investigation and verification of identity to a degree which our wee little slice of life has never practiced before over anything, and that level of data mining is itself problematic.
So far, our website hasn't suffered any kind of major hack, but dating sites are especially vulnerable targets for weirdos.
What was that adultery club for people wanting to cheat on their spouses that got hacked a while back and got its names published on the net, including some famous ones?
Ashley's site.
I think it was something like that.
Anyway, imagine what the so-called anti-fascists could do with data from one of our dating sites.
So, I think the internet is pretty much out for any bridge building between the white genders.
Okay, I'm running way long, but what do you guys think of this gender gap and how do we bridge it?
Sounds like a good opportunity for you to make some more MP3 files for Radio Free Northwest.
Lay them on me.
But for now, time is up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 2188, Bremerton, Washington, 98310, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
Freedom.
▲
Export Selection