All Episodes
Nov. 12, 2015 - Radio Free Nortwest - H.A. Covington
59:31
20151112_rfn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, tell me why you hurry so.
Hush your vocal, hush and listen, and his cheeks were all aglow.
I bear orders from the captain, get you ready quick and soon, for the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon, by the rising of the moon.
For the pikes must be together by the rising of the moon.
Oh, then tell me, Sean O 'Farrell, where the gathering is to be?
In the old spot by the river, a rifle known to you and me.
One more roar for signal, token, whistle of an arching tune.
For your bike upon your shoulder by the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
By the rising of the moon.
Which arrives upon your shore By the rising of the moon Out from many a maud-walled cavern eyes We're watching through the night.
Many a manly chest was sobbing for the blessed morning light.
Wars passed along the valleys like the man she's lonely crew.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
At the rising of the moon.
And a thousand blades were flashing at the rising of the moon.
Greetings from the Northwest Homeland, comrades.
It's November the 12th, 2015.
I'm Harold Covington, and this is Radio Free Northwest.
Right, this week I think I'll start off with one of my famous historical digressions, and I'll try not to bore you folks absolutely to tears.
On Saturday, I sent out a link to a YouTube video I found entitled, The Bodies in the Well.
which discusses the discovery in an old well of 17 sets of human remains in the ancient English town of Norwich.
If any of you who didn't get this email want to watch this video, contact me at nwnet, that's n-w-n-e-t at earthlink.net, and I'll send you the link, or just do a search on YouTube for The Bodies in the Well.
The skeletal remains were carbon dated from the early to middle part of the 13th century, and there was a fascinating account of how the bodies were found, how they were DNA-typed and dated, how the scientists were able to determine not just the ethnicity of the dead people, but what they'd eaten all their lives, where they were from geographically, etc., etc.
To make a long story short, it would appear that the dead people were Jews, apparently all related, as well as at least two local people who were Gentiles and who were presumably servants or associates of the Jews.
As nearly as could be determined, they had been dumped down the well either alive or dead sometime in the 1240s or 1250s, although it's hard to be more precise, and there's a good deal of wiggle room on that date.
Although it wasn't explicitly stated in the program, my guess is that they were tossed down the well naked, since apparently no accompanying artifacts such as buttons or decayed leather shoes or buckles or fibrous remains of clothing or jewelry, nothing of that kind, was found.
It would seem that our ancestors had their own forthright ways of dealing with the Jewish question and the problems caused by the Jewish presence in European society.
Well, we knew that.
The narrators of the British documentary program itself were suitably shocked and horrified, of course, at these horrible, hateful, bigoted English people in the 1200s who behaved as if they'd never seen a copy of the New Statesman in their lives.
But I was amazed at how honest the narration was about certain uncomfortable historical facts.
For example, the open admission by the program that at that period in English history, the Jews essentially controlled the primitive banking and financial system of the time, much like they do today.
As might be expected, the program glossed over certain even more uncomfortable facts of life in merry old England back in the day, and although I know for a tiny podcast like this to attempt to correct or argue with the mighty BBC is ludicrous, I'm sorry, I just can't resist.
And bear with me, guys, all of this does have a point, eventually.
In the 12th and 13th century, there were maybe 10,000 Jews in England, which doesn't sound like a lot, but bear in mind that the total population was only estimated at about 2 or 3 million people.
And the Jews were among the powerful governing elite, for the precise reason that the cultured British lady on the program stated that they had been deliberately given control of most of the realm's financial affairs by a succession of English monarchs, all of whom profited from this arrangement, along with the Kikes themselves.
I don't remember all the details on this, but from the time of Richard the Lionhearted, at least, and probably some time before, the Jews of England were what was known as King's Persons.
They literally, legally belonged to the king, meaning that essentially they were above the law.
They couldn't be arrested or tried or disciplined in any way except by royal officials acting at the king's direction when they showed their butts too bad.
Jews were largely exempted from the laws of parliament and from the jurisdiction of the local feudal lords in their courts.
In theory, they could quite literally get away with murder, and sometimes did.
The fact is that for a period of a little over 200 years, dating from the Norman Conquest, Early medieval England was one of the best countries in the world to be Jewish in.
The kings used the Jews in two serious financial capacities that were vital to the economy, money lending and tax collection.
The loan chucking thing is self-explanatory, but medieval tax collectors put today's IRS to shame.
They were actually referred to as tax farmers, meaning that they were private contractors who signed a commitment to give the king X amount of gold and silver every year.
And anything over and above that, they'd keep for their salary, and I think we can all spot the flaw in that system.
It made a certain sense for medieval monarchies to use the tax-farming system because it relieved them of the necessity of hiring and training a civil service and paying them, and trying to keep them honest, which was even less possible in those days than today.
I can't imagine a system any more prone to corruption and abuse.
But most medieval rulers didn't care, so long as they got their gold and silver on time every year, and this crap was subsequently the cause of God knows how many peasant revolts all across Europe that were bloodily suppressed after people simply had enough of being skinned alive by these damn Jews.
I suspect that the two Gentiles who were found down the Norwich well by the archaeologists must have been hired muscled, helping the Jews in question collect debts or taxes.
Of course, we can't date the remains precisely, nor can we find any written record of this incident, what happened, or what may have caused it.
It's entirely possible that these hebes just extorted too much and too heavy-handedly through either tax collection or usury or both, and one day the local people finally just had enough of it, burned down their houses and threw their bodies down the well.
However, I have a theory.
Now, this may be all wet, and it does require believing that the British scientists were almost a century off in their carbon dating and the remains.
But could this not have been something to do, maybe, with the murder of a young lad of 12 called William of Norwich in the year 1144?
I won't go into lengthy details on the case except to say that it was the first recorded case of Jewish ritual murder in England.
That a number of Jews were arrested by the sheriff of Norwich and then suddenly released by order of King Stephen on the ground that they were the king's persons and therefore not subject to the ordinary laws of the realm.
Against, say, cutting young boys'throats and draining their blood out of them.
Now, I know the discrepancy in the carbon dating probably shouldn't be ignored.
But I can't help wonder if those folks in Norwich remembered young William as they were dropping those Jews down the well.
And by the way, the golden age of Jewry in medieval England ended in the year 1290, when King Edward I finally got rid of them and expelled them from England.
To which country they did not return until the year 1655, when Oliver Cromwell invited them back to repay the loans that they'd given him and his Puritan buddies during the English Civil War for overthrowing King Charles I, so forth and so on, blah blah blah.
I know that doesn't mean much of anything to you guys, but put it this way.
One of the reasons I believe that the English-speaking people became such a great power in the world, culturally, politically, militarily, economically...
was that for a period of almost 400 years, England was without Jews.
Through the late Middle Ages, on into the Renaissance, time of Henry VIII, Elizabeth I, and so forth and so on, all of that time, England was allowed to develop as a society and as a nation without Jews draining the life force out of it.
All of the other countries of Europe went through their renaissances, of course, and many became powerful and glorious nations and so forth and so on, but they always had that little germ of rot right at their heart somewhere.
The English never did, and I think it really gave them a leg up when the time came to compete with France and Spain and other countries for colonies in the New World, that sort of stuff.
Anyway, that's just speculation.
But right now, I have to say that it gives me a sense of satisfaction to know that at least once, long ago, my ancestors were men who knew how to deal with this Jewish cancer that seems to have stumped most of modern civilization.
Toss them down the well.
Pretty simple when you think about it.
Wee!
In my country there is problem.
And that problem is the Jew.
Thank you.
They take everybody money They never give it back Throw the Jew down the well So my country can be free You must grab him by his horns Then we have a big party If you see the Jew coming We're
Thank you.
Thank you.
Tonight, I'm going to be discussing my 10th edition of Arthur Kemp's March of the Titans.
And this is the special edition that I've been promising, The Racial State.
Now, I'm just going to jump right into the most important aspects of this topic.
The author's thesis in writing this chapter was that the Reich was relatively transparent in what it desired to accomplish, and it was popular because it was responsive to people's needs.
It's true that the inherent National Socialist philosophy was the leadership principle, which was in line with the National Socialist ideas of order and struggle.
While it was not a democratic principle per se, it is true that Hitler was elected, and that by March of 1933, the National Socialists had 44% of Parliament.
Eventually, the smaller parties would also merge into the National Socialists, and by July of 1933, it was the only legal party in Germany.
A part of the reason that this was the case is not merely a notion of dictatorship or something like that, but you have to appreciate that National Socialism is really a worldview and not just a party, but it presented itself as a party.
So at this point, the party was trying to cement its worldview, and that's why I think that it really needed to be However, the party did promise that a referendum would be held on National Socialism, and when it was held in 1938, it had a 98.9 approval rating.
One might claim intimidation, but if you watched Triumphs of the Will, you will find that this claim is most unbelievable.
Because the people in triumphs of the will are statically happy.
And indeed, most stayed loyal, even at the height of the war.
My explanation for this is not simply justification of effort, but rather the fact that the party always responded to the people's needs.
When Hitler came to power, Germany was very poor, and we know that's because of Versailles.
So Hitler developed a barter system.
That took Germany out of international finance and the gold standard.
Another thing that happened was that the state took the place of unions.
Now, I know in other situations, unions can be very much needed.
However, in this case, the state got actively involved in labor disputes.
And they also promoted something called the Strength Through Joy movement.
Which was a program for worker vacations.
Workers were even able to get luxury cruises under this movement.
There were also improved factory conditions and affordable, attractive housing geared towards lower incomes.
And often this housing was designed by Hitler.
Another thing that the National Socialists did is that they involved young people.
According to the author, The HJ and BDM activities were often held on Sundays.
And the author does point out that Hitler and the inner party disliked Christianity and they wanted to direct the youth to A more organic and dharmic worldview.
Now, also to this end, the National Socialists abolished animal experimentation and also certain animal slaughtering procedures that they found inhumane.
They were really forerunners in public health.
They banned DDT and warned of the dangers associated with lead asbestos and mercury, and also radiation.
They advocated for a return to more natural foods.
There was a government bureau on the dangers of alcohol and tobacco, and they even researched the effects of nicotine on chromosomes.
Hitler was a dedicated anti-smoking advocate and started an anti-smoking institute at Jenner University with his own money.
Smoking was banned in many public places.
Also, they established penalties and blood tests to deter drunken driving.
Getting to a practice that was admittedly more controversial, the regime greatly wanted to reduce human suffering.
Now, another thing that was done was the establishment of eugenics laws, and this was for the prevention of diseased offspring.
Now, many countries in Europe and America had similar laws at that point.
It's important to note that these laws applied to Germans.
These were not particularly laws about minority communities.
In fact, of the 400,000 adults that were sterilized under this program, none of these adults were Jewish.
It's important to note that if there were to be a future regime of this sort, and I don't know how that would happen, but if it ever did, in today's world we could use genetic engineering, for example, instead of sterilization.
And there would also be, in many cases, better ways to help adults and children with significant disabilities.
At any rate, it is also true, in line with the topics of eugenics, that there were Nordicist intellectuals in Germany at this time that hoped that in a hundred years of this type of society, the right population would shift in a more Nordic direction.
To this end, it was quite natural to make laws regarding the relations of Germans or German-related people with non-Germans.
And a very modest first step in this direction was the Nuremberg Laws.
And this was just simply a law that essentially said that a person with two Jewish grandparents could not marry a German.
However, someone who was a quarter-Jewish could at least theoretically marry a German, but they could not marry a quarter-Jew or a half-Jew.
These very mild laws were considered far too lenient by Hitler, but there is something about these laws that may very well surprise you and may alter your views considerably.
These laws were actually approved by a German Council of Judges.
And they were welcomed by Zionists, because really there was a mutual goal in this case.
Both the Germans and the Zionists desired separation, and they worked together.
To this end, the German government set up an account to help Jews move to the Holy Land, and also agricultural training was provided in Czechoslovakia for Jews that wanted to move to a collective farm.
Now also, throughout Europe, many German-related peoples supported National Socialism and started their own organizations.
Also, citizenship in the Reich was not just a matter of being German.
The question was loyalty.
So, German-related peoples often joined the combat branch of the SS, and at the end of the war, 66% of the SS were, this is specifically talking about the Waffen-SS, were German-related non-Germans, okay, or German-related peoples.
Now, one example of this that the author gives is Andrei Lasov, who is a Russian.
And this was in line with Himmler's goal of white unity.
Now, many nations did join the Reich, but within these nations, you often had partisan groups.
And this is very much what you get with, for example, the French resistance.
Now, these groups were illegal with regard to the Geneva Convention because it's illegal for resistance to go on after a country has surrendered.
But you did have these subversives, and this was often for political reasons.
Despite the fact that Zionists got on with the National Socialists, there were also many Jews that were involved in communism.
So it was not uncommon for them to be in resistance movements.
Also, you had prisoners of war that were captured from the Eastern Front.
And as the war went on, the author claims that there were attempts to resettle Jews in Russia.
Now, the author claims that there was a lack of documentation regarding the infamous final solution.
And if true...
I would agree that this would be odd, given the German compulsion to document everything down to the last detail, even when this information would certainly be damning.
However, the author, and also I myself, have no desire to enter into the fray of revisionism.
I also acknowledge that despite the good relations with Zionists on behalf of the National Socialists, the West in general, and Europe and Germany in particular, were very anti-Semitic at this time in history.
Even so, the mainstream often forget that for Germans and German-related peoples, the pre-war Reich was really a paradise on earth.
I really believe that no other group would get so involved in other directed empathy as to forget self-interest to the degree that we have.
So, I really hope you enjoyed this discussion and found this educational.
So I would like to wish you a good evening and hail victory, comrades.
Thank you.
This is Arland Brann.
The song is called Call of the Blood.
The blood.
Thank you.
We follow the blood, dear.
We follow the blood, dear.
We follow the blood, dear.
We follow the blood, dear.
We follow the blood, dear.
you you you Thank you.
Down through the history of this show, I've periodically run historical clips from various famous leaders and personalities from our past.
People like Ernst Zundel, Huey Long, so forth and so on.
George Lincoln Rockwell, of course.
People whose names that a younger generation of white nationalists need to know.
You need to know who these men were, what their histories were, what they did for the cause.
Because, you see, we are part of a tradition.
I'm not going to sit here and tell you that it's an entirely proud and glorious tradition, because, as most of you know, we've got a lot of gooboo patches in our past, but this is another name that, if you've never heard of this gentleman, you need to know.
I'm referring to Dr. Revelo Pendleton Oliver.
This is a speech that Dr. Oliver gave in the summer of 1968 in Toronto, I believe, anyway somewhere in Canada.
As you can see, even back in the day, there were those among us who understood and saw clearly what was coming.
Applause Thank you, Mr. Gastic.
Mr. Gnostic has asked me, ladies and gentlemen, to discuss with you the race war that is now underway in the United States.
My function here certainly is not to deliver an oration weighted with rhetoric and devotional exhortation, nor is it to urge or recommend to you any course of action.
You here in Canada have enough troubles of your own, and you are likely to have still more in the near future.
I shall merely remind you that the white occidental populations of Canada and the United States, although divided by government, and to some slight extent by historical development and tradition, are peoples of the same origin, belonging to the same race, and sharing the same Christian civilization of the West, and that they have a common cause, because they both belong to the world's most hated and despised minority.
Far more than our geographical contiguity means that we have a common destiny.
Although our enemies, adapting their methods to the differences in the composition of our populations and the structure of our economy, are attacking us in ways that superficially differ, the fact that you and we are of the same race means that you and we shall inevitably, in the long run, have a common fate, whatever that may be.
As I see it, therefore, My function today is to give you, as objectively and dispassionately as I can, an estimate of the present plight of the United States with particular reference to the race war.
Now, it would profit us little to recite either general statistics or typical details concerning the riots and small-scale insurrections that our federal government has incited and financed in more than 200 of our cities during the past four years.
It would do little good to estimate how many hundreds of millions of dollars worth of property the savage destroyed, how many policemen they have killed, crippled or wounded, how many white women they have raped or mutilated or murdered, and how many other crimes they have committed, with the encouragement and under the protection of our federal government and the more brazenly corrupt of our local governments.
An account of some specific and particularly noteworthy atrocities Might be shocking and thrilling, unless they've already come to seem commonplace, but it would not be very profitable for us to review them here.
For the savages have committed no crimes that a reasonable man could not have predicted and anticipated ten years ago, or fifty years ago, or a hundred years ago, merely on the basis of his knowledge of the nature and character of their race, and of their behavior, both in their native habitat and in places, Such is Hispaniola, where they had already been incited to hatred of the white man and of the civilization that the white man created.
Harrowing and gruesome, as that many of the atrocities are, they are really no more significant than what happens when you drop a lighted match into a barrel of gasoline.
Everybody, except perhaps the feeble-minded, knows precisely what happens when you drop the match in the gasoline.
And also everybody, unless extremely ignorant.
Should know precisely what Congoids do when they revert to the savagery that is their natural state and from which they can emerge only so long as they are under the tutelage and discipline of a civilized race.
I need not describe the riots and insurrections that have taken place from 1964 to the present and that are still occurring this summer.
Occurring despite the energetic and almost desperate efforts of the administration in Washington.
To postpone really sensational uprisings until after the elections in November.
And that, in practical terms, means until next summer.
For it is also characteristic of the Congoids that even their most enthusiastic apostles of social justice and civil rights don't like to burn and kill in bad weather, no matter how well they're paid for it.
Here in Canada, you have undoubtedly learned something about the riots from your own press.
You see, it is not feasible for the press entirely to suppress such news.
Canadians do visit the United States, and most of them, I'm sure, are not sufficiently progressive to enjoy the sights that they might chance to see in Detroit or Cleveland or Newark or Los Angeles or Peoria or almost any city in the northern part of the United States.
Moreover, some of you have undoubtedly friends or relatives.
And so long as you are permitted to use the mails and the telephone, it would be absurd to pretend that all is serene and lovely south of the border.
The best that your press can do, therefore, is to minimize the outbreaks that are so noteworthy that some mention of them must be made, and either not report crimes or disguise them by concealing the race of the criminal.
And then fill up the rest of their column with the usual hogwash about ghettos and the underprivileged, and suggest that the whole responsibility and guilt falls on the wicked white Americans who were so bigoted and selfish that they neglect their Christian duty to supply the noble blacks with enough Cadillacs, white whores, narcotics, incendiary bombs, and automatic rifles to keep them amused and happy.
But if you have learned the art of reading lie papers and extrapolating from what they do report, you probably have a fairly good idea of what happens during the riots in this opening phase of the race war.
In this first phase, according to the strategic plan drawn up long ago, the tactical objective is to terrorize and either kill, cow, or convert the very large part of our Negro population who would prefer to retain their carefree comforts.
Rather than kill and loot.
They are chiefly the older people who grew up when we still maintain a minimum of civilized order.
Now such conversions naturally increase geometrically, not only through terrorism and contagion of mass violence, but also as the domesticated Negroes reluctantly learn to despise us for our craven refusal to maintain order and protect ourselves and them.
And as they behold with contempt the antics of white degenerates, especially the young punks and sluts that we hatch in our colleges and let loose on our streets to display their irrationality, their personal filth, and their conscious degradation that is so great that they mix, sexually and otherwise, with the blacks.
But even with the intimidation and conversion of the peaceful Negroes proceeding by a geometrical ratio, it will take another year at least to complete the phase, the first phase of the offensive against us.
It will take another year even under favorable conditions.
Those favorable conditions include successful legislation to require first the registration and then the confiscation of firearms now in private possession of white men.
That is necessary, you see, to reduce the occupational hazards which now deter even the best-paid apostles of racial equality from invading white communities and enjoying a general butchery.
Therefore, despite the impatience of our more liberal and progressive elements, you cannot expect, before next summer at the earliest, even small-scale massacres of whites, as distinct, of course, from rioting in the integrated areas And as distinct from the beating and killing of stupid individuals who rashly venture into the streets of our cities after dark, alone and unarmed.
I said, and next summer at the earliest, even under favorable conditions.
Favorable, of course, from the standpoint of the persons who have planned and are executing this whole operation.
The really interesting question, therefore, is how likely are those favorable conditions to be realized, and how soon?
It seems to me, therefore, the most useful thing that I can do in the allotted time here is to consider with you what developments can reasonably be foreseen on the basis of present facts and human experience.
I can indulge in no predictions or prophecies.
I have dull crystal ball to show me scenes of the future.
I am unfortunately unaware of what the stars portend in their configurations and conjunctions, and unlike so many of my conservative compatriots, I have not been informed of any future miracle.
All that I can do is reason from the present situation to what consequences are most likely, and I need not remind you that that necessarily means a calculation of probability, not a revelation of certainty.
Let me begin, therefore, with the central fact now before us.
The United States has passed the point of no return.
It passed that point late in 1965, or at the very latest, early in 1966.
The United States has passed the point of no return and now has no alternative.
It can only go on to a grim and dire future of bloodshed, destruction, and widespread suffering.
That is a fact, not a prediction, except in the sense that a statement made five minutes after the Titanic ran the iceberg that the ship was going to sink could be called a prediction.
As in the case of the Titanic, the only uncertainties now are how many lives will be lost and who will be their survivors.
That is all.
In the United States, I say, bloodshed, destruction, and human suffering on a scale surpassing anything thus far experienced are inevitable.
I mean inevitable in terms of the calculations that can be made.
One can, to be sure, imagine ways in which that future could be averted.
A little race of green man from a more advanced civilization on Mars or one of the planets of Alpha Centauri may descend in flying saucers and put everything to rights for us.
Or alternatively, Gabriel may appear this evening or tomorrow evening and blow his great trumpet.
Blow it so loudly that the thunderous sound rolling through the heavens will be heard even by the many who will at that hour be staring at their boob tubes.
Or there could occur the even greater miracle, imagined by Quevedo in his Ora de Todos, a reversal of nature so great that politicians begin to tell the truth, and our allied enemies fall out among themselves.
But such blissful events are, I think, unlikely, and in any case, they certainly cannot be predicted by human reason.
One can, of course, sympathize with those who irrationally insist on believing in miracles.
Not long ago, an acquaintance of mine, who is becoming recognized as an authority on financial and economic matters, was discussing with a fairly prosperous couple ways of preserving some of their property in the days that lie ahead.
After a few minutes, however, the lady suddenly stood up and cried, But I don't want to know what is really happening.
And she rushed from the room.
Perhaps she had a point.
As matters turned out, The citizens of Babylon, who feasted and caroused at their opulent banquet tables, in drunken unconcern, while the Persian army of Cyrus the Great was already within their walls, lived a little longer than they otherwise would have done, and suffered less pain, and a sudden and unforeseen end came upon them.
Perhaps that will also be true of those who obstinately today close their eyes and live in a world of dreams.
But I am not a pessimist.
So I do not believe that that is necessarily true.
In this situation, where death and suffering are inevitably before us, the optimist hopes and even believes that we still have a chance to limit the number of deaths and the amount of suffering, and that what is more important, we can survive our disaster and our posterity may recover what we have lost.
The pessimist is one who is convinced that all is now irretrievably lost, that we shall perish, and that we shall have either no posterity at all, or descendants, such that we would say of them that it would be far better had they never been born.
I am still an optimist, you see.
For if I were not, I certainly should not spend my time distressing matters with you.
There are eight distinct factors in our present position.
That places beyond the point of no return.
For when the International Lords set out to subjugate the American people, using Franklin Roosevelt as their first fool agent, they planned to break the backs of the American people at every vertebrate, in every way, from sabotage of our currency to sabotage of our armed forces, both in armaments and in morale.
And their consistent and unremitting work for the past 40 years has been successful.
When I here confine myself to the race war that they have so patiently contrived, for that alone will suffice to show why we are beyond the point of no return.
And it is, I think, moreover, the crucial factor, for it is the one, the one factor, that is almost completely beyond their control now.
Economically, for example, they undoubtedly have the power to either increase or to moderate the pressures upon us.
Militarily, they can either increase or decrease the likelihood of an immediate military attack upon us.
But the race factor is one that they almost have no control over now.
Over the past two-thirds of a century, they have spent vast sums privately.
Far vaster sums from the public treasury to arouse in insight among the Negroes the violent and implacable hatred of white men that now animates the dominant segment of that race in the United States.
Our enemies have done their work well, perhaps too well.
What was a little cub when they began to nurture and train it in 1910 has become a raging grizzly that it is ever more difficult to hold in leash.
The frenzied leaders of the savages are no longer content to have the public schools supply white children to be spat on, mauled, and sexually abused.
Nor are they content in the large cities merely to rob, slug, rape, and murder after dark.
They are no longer content merely to loot and burn while the police are under stringent orders not to interfere with the little darlings.
And the militia, when they are called out after a maximum of procrastination, are given only blank cartridges, lest they discourage Washington's little pets.
They are even finding it tedious to shoot policemen from ambush.
Two of the most raucous animals, one named Williams and the other called Carmichael, on the 14th and the 23rd of July, respectively, announced their determination to take for the blacks.
As much of the United States as has a climate that pleases them.
And they're to set up a black republic, from which, of course, the stupid white American rabbits that are not butchered when the territory is taken will be driven into the northern regions, and they're allowed to work to support their black masters, in the luxury to which all blacks are entitled by birth.
All that, of course, is merely a part of the original plan.
Formulated in detail in 1922, the plan for it to carve a black Soviet from the territory of the United States.
It was openly proclaimed even before 1922, but since that date, the date of the famous raid in Bridgman, Michigan, everybody knew or should have known about it.
We may therefore assume that the plan to set up a black Soviet On the territory of the United States is now known to and heartily approved by all the renegade Americans that you see and hear yammering for more civil rights and yowling about the evils of racism.
The lusts thus excited cannot be appeased, for every appeasement merely incites them, inflames them, and those lusts cannot now be repressed.
Without a fearful violence.
Without the sternest imposition of martial law and a virtual dictatorship.
Mobs, it is true, can be dispersed or subdued by troops.
But the guerrilla warfare for which the blacks have been thoroughly prepared to quit cannot, under any circumstances, be controlled easily or without heavy loss to the white population.
Nothing now could change.
Or control the passions of the exhilarated savages who have learned to hate and despise the white man.
To hate him for the most cogent of reasons.
Because he is white and because he is unapproachably superior in all things that comport with the civilization that he created.
And to despise him because he is so stupid that he actually permitted them to vote.
So stupid that he permitted them to be told that they are his equal.
And so stupid that he now permits them to act as his masters.
The hatred now aroused cannot be stated by anything short of the total enslavement of white men and the eventual disappearance of their race in a mass of fetid, brutish, and degraded mongrels who will, after the last white is gone, be equally hated by the blacks.
For you must remember that in Haiti, after the savages, with the help of Great Britain, broke loose and butchered all the whites, they then turned their hand to the more leisurely task of exterminating the mulattoes.
Now we may be certain that the United States...
I'll probably run the rest of that speech next week.
In the meantime, this is Nobody's Darling.
Some bright morning when this life is over I'll fly away To that home on God's celestial shore I'll fly away
Oh, I'll fly away, fly away, oh glory I'll fly away in the morning When I die, hallelujah, by and by I'll fly away
When the shadows of this light will come I'll fly away But like a bird from these prison walls I'll
fly, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away, fly away, oh glory I'll fly away in the morning But when I die, oh glory, I'll fly away I'll fly away, oh glory, I'll fly away I'll fly away, oh glory, I'll fly away
Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away Oh, how glad and happy when we meet I'll fly away Oh, how glad and happy when we meet I'll fly away I'll fly away
Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away
Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away, oh glory, I'll fly away Oh, I'll fly away in the morning Oh, I'll fly away, oh glory, I'll fly away in the morning Oh
Gloria, I'll fly away in the morning Oh, my God, hallelujah, bye and bye I'll fly away, oh I'll fly away Oh, my God, hallelujah, bye and bye Thank you.
Okay, I'm running a little long on this one, and I don't really have time to delve as extensively as I should into some of the topics I wanted to cover, so I'll deal with a couple of shorter matters instead.
Got an email from Nancy D. in Cary, North Carolina.
Dear Mr. Covington, how can I tell whether or not I'm being watched by the dictatorship?
Realistically speaking, how afraid do we really need to be?
Well, Nancy, according to Edward Snowden, whom I have no reason to disbelieve and whom even the regime itself has never claimed to be lying, all, let me repeat that, all email and all cell phone communication in this country and throughout much of the First World is routinely intercepted and archived by the NSA, the National Security Agency.
Apparently, this data is held in two huge secret facilities in Utah and West Virginia, which I presume probably look like something out of the X-Files, with long rows of steel shelves and computer data storage units with all kinds of blinking lights and whatnot.
This warrantless interception of all private communication in this country has been going on for a long time.
Mr. Snowden is hazy about the precise length of time, but I can tell you this much from personal experience because I was working for an IT company at the time this happened.
And that is that the FBI installed a system called Carnivore to intercept all email communication in America in October 2001.
Now, I know this because it didn't work for the first week or so, and none of our customers could authenticate their passwords.
So, they couldn't connect to the internet, which meant they were calling us and screaming about it, and as icing on the cake, we service techs were forbidden to tell them.
Why it was happening on pain of being arrested for violating national security, and no, I'm not making this up.
That was a real fun time, I can tell you.
I find it very suggestive that the FBI had this carnivore system sitting on the shelf and ready to go for some time before, but they could never get congressional approval until 9-11 happened.
I know it's hard for some of you younger guys to believe, but as recently as 14 years ago, what Congress said or did actually mattered, at least to a little bit of an extent.
They actually had some power and authority and control over the regime's actions, although not much.
Anyway, then 9-11 occurred, and the Patriot Act was rushed through, and hey, presto, all of a sudden, within a month, the FBI was intercepting and archiving every email sent, which even in those days was a huge amount of data.
Who were you emailing back in 2001, Nancy?
You may have forgotten, but the NSA knows.
Nancy, we're living in what is known in modern times as a surveillance state, meaning that the government doesn't just watch criminals or even suspected political dissidents, it watches all of its citizens as a matter of official and recognized public policy.
George Orwell wrote first about the surveillance state in the novel 1984 when he speaks of the telescreens everywhere.
In the modern world, information is power, and like all dictatorships, the American regime wants a monopoly on it and wants all of it.
The ultimate goal of the surveillance state is to watch everybody all the time to look forward.
This objective is to be a part of the world's life.
Probably isn't completely achievable even with modern technology, at least I hope not, but we'll just have to see how that plays out.
The closest anyone has ever come to achieving the kind of total surveillance and supervision of thought that the alphabet soup agencies here and in Europe are attempting to attain was done in the old communist bloc in East Germany with the Stasi and in Ceausescu's Romania with the Securitate.
They were pre-internet and largely pre-technical by our standards, of course.
Although they conducted comprehensive phone tapping and electronic bugging operations, but let's face it, Cold War communist technology in the 60s and 70s was pretty primitive.
Mostly the old communist security organs used an army of human informers.
And I do mean an army.
It's estimated that toward the end of the regime in East Germany, one out of every three East Germans was an informer for the Stasi.
Now, as to your question of how afraid do we really have to be, Nancy?
Well...
Probably not as afraid as the people of East Germany or Romania or Stalin's Russia, at least not yet.
Always with that caveat.
Not yet.
I think it's pretty clear that as the overall situation in Obama's America, soon to be the sea hag's America, gets worse, the dictatorship is going to become more and more frantic and brutal in their attempt to maintain control.
I honestly do not believe that these people have the technical expertise and competence to create a full 1984-like surveillance state in this country.
But there's no question in my mind that they have the will to do so and are in the process of trying to implement something of the kind.
The problem with establishing and running the American surveillance state lies not in the technology but with the lack of manpower, specifically trained analysts.
Who understand what the regime is looking for, what its political goals are, and how to find and process electronic communications that might indicate dissent or disbelief in the official narrative.
There needs to be a whole army of those.
There are indications that such an army is being recruited by the dictatorship and trained and paid out of assorted covert intelligence budgets and black budgets and so on, although for obvious reasons the details on that are kind of sketchy.
The ultimate goal of Obama now and Hillary to come is and will be to watch everybody all the time.
But America is so big and the amount of intercepted data is so huge that even these bloated alphabet soup agencies like the FBI and the DHS and the NSA, CIA, IRS simply don't have the manpower to read and analyze and summarize every email and every phone conversation that's taken place in the past 14 years.
I have to be a bit more concerned than you do, Nancy, because I'm rather more vocal than you in letting people know that my mind is not under control and that I think bad thoughts.
But I understand the question, and I know a lot of people are concerned about getting on the databases of the secret police, and by the by, I use that term secret police not to be funny or melodramatic, but to refer to the whole gamut of alphabet soup agencies that watch us and threaten to do us harm, the ones I just named.
And probably more we don't know about.
Cutting to the chase, depending on how closely the dictatorship is monitoring our activity, I think it's pretty likely that anyone who emails me at all about anything goes into a special Northwest Front file somewhere in West Virginia or Utah.
I think your emails are probably more likely to be audited, which is apparently their term for actually reading them.
This is basically a fact of 21st century life, and we have to either learn to live with it, or flee screaming into the night and run off and try and hide in a hole somewhere, because, like it or not, in this year of our Lord 2015, this is how we communicate, through electronic devices.
And that means that our Lords and Masters are at least going to intercept an archive, if not necessarily sit down and read every email and text you ever sent.
I'm not going to get all hysterical and paranoid about this, but neither do I want to downplay it or deny it.
It's simply something we all have to learn to live with.
If it's any consolation, as of July 2014, which is the last year I could find any statistics on, 1.5 million Americans were on the official terrorist watch list, including myself.
So if you're on there with me, Nancy, we've got plenty of company.
Anyway, now our time's up for this week's edition of Radio Free Northwest.
This program is brought to you by the Northwest Front, Post Office Box 4856, Seattle, Washington 98194, or you can go to the party's website at www.northwestfront.org.
This is Harold Covington, and I'll see you next week.
Until then, Sasha Underban.
We're good to go.
Export Selection